DOCSLIB.ORG

Download PGR Faculty Lists 2017-18 All (19 October 2017)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Faculty Lists for 2017-18 looking to fall 2018 *=70 or older in 2018 #=75 or older in 2018 Part-time faculty are half-time, unless otherwise noted. October 19, 2017 UNITED STATES (the top 50 will be ranked) FACULTY # Arizona Faculty: *Julia Annas, Thomas Christiano, Stewart Cohen, Juan Comesaña, Gerald (“Jerry”) Gaus, Michael Gill, Richard Healey, *Terence Horgan, Jenann Ismael, J. Christopher Maloney, Michael McKenna, Shaun Nichols, Guido Pincione, Marga Reimer, Connie S. Rosati, Daniel Russell, Carolina Sartorio, David Schmidtz, Houston Smit, Mark Timmons, Joseph Tolliver, Jason Turner, Steven Wall, Jonathan Weinberg. Cognate faculty and philosophers in other units: Don Fallis, Martin Fricke, Kay Mathieson, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Christopher Robertson, Simone Sepe. FACULTY # Arizona State Faculty: Brad Armendt, Thomas Blackson, Elizabeth Brake, Cheshire Calhoun, Bernard Kobes, Peter de Marneffe, Joan McGregor, Shyam Nair, Nestor Ángel Pinillos, Douglas W. Portmore, Steven Reynolds. Part-time faculty: Cognate faculty and philosophers in other units: Richard Creath, Tyler DesRoches, Zachary Horne, Ted Humphrey, Patricia J. Huntingon, Manfred Laubichler, Jane Maineschein, Martin Beck Matuštík, Ben A. Minteer, *Jeffrie G. Murphy, Beckett Sterner, Jason Robert, Hava Tirosh-Samuelson, Norbert Samuelson, Beckett Sterner. FACULTY # Berkeley Faculty: Lara Buchak, John Campbell, Timothy Clarke, Shamik Dasgupta, Hannah Ginsborg, Wesley Holliday, Niko Kolodny, Geoffrey Lee, John MacFarlane, Paolo Mancosu, Alva Noë, Kristin Primus, #Hans Sluga, R. Jay Wallace, Daniel Warren, Seth Yalcin. Part-time Faculty: Joshua Cohen (.25 time), Michael (M.G.F.) Martin, Veronique Munoz Darde, Kwong-Loi Shun, #Barry Stroud. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Meir Dan-Cohen, G.R.F. Ferrari, Alison Gopnik, Jodi Halpern, Kinch Hoekstra, Christopher Kutz, #Anthony A. Long, Sara Magrin, Line Mikkelsen, Stephen Palmer, Eric Rakowski, John R. Steel. FACULTY # Brown Faculty: Felicia Ackerman, Nomy Arpaly, Justin Broackes, David Christensen, James Dreier, David Estlund, Mary Louise Gill, *Paul Guyer, Richard G. Heck, Jr., *Christopher Hill, Charles E. Larmore, Adam Pautz, Bernard Reginster, Joshua Schechter. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Corey Brettschneider, Pauline Jacobson, David Konstan, 1 Sharon Krause, John Tomasi, William Warren. FACULTY # BU Faculty: Hugh Baxter, Alisa Bokulich, Tian Yu Cao, Ann E Cudd, Daniel Dahlstrom, Juliet Floyd, Aaron Garrett, Marc Gasser-Wingate, Charles L. Griswold, Jr., Walter Hopp, Paul Katsafanas, Victor Kumar, Michaela McSweeney, #Robert C. Neville, Russell Powell, David Roochnik, James Schmidt, C. Allen Speight, Susanne Sreedhar, Daniel Star, Judson C. Webb. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Jeffrey P. Coulter, James Fleming, Akihiro Kanamori, Alan M. Olson, John Stachel, Judith Swanson, Steven Tigner. FACULTY # Chicago Faculty: Matthew Boyle, Jason Bridges, Daniel Brudney, Agnes Callard, Kevin Davey, Arnold I. Davidson, David Finkelstein, Anton Ford, Matthias Haase, Michael Kremer, Gabriel Richardson Lear, *Jonathan Lear, Raoul Moati, *Martha C. Nussbaum, Thomas Pashby, *Robert B. Pippin, Robert J. Richards, Anubav Vasudevan, Candace Vogler, Malte Willer. Part-Time Faculty: James Conant, Michael N. Forster (.25 time), *Jean-Luc Marion. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Elizabeth Asmis, Shadi Bartsch, Chris Kennedy, Ben Laurence, Brian Leiter, *David Wellbery. FACULTY # Carnegie Mellon Faculty: Jeremy Avigad, Steve Awodey, Adam Bjorndahl, Simon Cullen, David Danks, B. George, #Clark Glymour, Mara Harrell, Kevin Kelly, Alex John London, Joseph Ramsey, Richard Scheines (also Dean), Teddy Seidenfeld, *Wilfried Sieg, Mandy Simons, Joel Smith, Peter Spirtes, Danielle Wenner, Thomas Werner, Kun Zhang, Kevin Zollman. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Andy Norman, Frank Pfenning, Wayne Wu. FACULTY # Colorado Faculty: Dominic Bailey, David Boonin, Carol Cleland, Heather Demarest, Iskra Fileva, Graeme Forbes, Chris Heathwood, Michael Huemer, *Alison Jaggar, Dan Kaufman, Mitzi Lee, Alastair Norcross, Graham Oddie, Robert Pasnau, Robert Rupert, Raul Saucedo, Matthias Steup, Ajume Wingo. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Marc Bekoff, Allan Franklin, Benjamin Hale, David Mapel, Laura Michaelis, Steve Vanderheiden. FACULTY # Columbia Faculty: David Albert, Akeel Bilgrami, Taylor Carman, Justin Clarke-Doane, John Collins, Melissa Fusco, #Haim Gaifman, Lydia Goehr, Robert Gooding-Williams, Dhananjay Jagannathan, Patricia Kitcher, Tamar Lando, Karen Lewis, Wolfgang Mann, Christia Mercer, Michelle Moody-Adams, John Morrison, Frederick Neuhouser, Elliot Paul, Christopher Peacocke, Carol Rovane, Una Stojnić, Kathryn Tabb, Achille Varzi, Katja Vogt. 2 Part-time faculty: *Axel Honneth, *Philip Kitcher (on phased retirement, concluding in 2020). Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Souleymane Bachir Diagne, #Jon Elster, #Kent Greenawalt, Jody S. Kraus, Wayne L. Proudfoot, #Joseph Raz (part-time), Gayatri Spivak. FACULTY # Connecticut Faculty: Dorit Bar-On, Heather Battaly, Donald L.M. Baxter, J.C. Beall, Paul Bloomfield, Thomas D. Bontly, Lewis Gordon, Mitchell Green, Michael P. Lynch, Alexus McLeod, Marcus Rossberg, Susan Schneider, Lionel Shapiro, Daniel Silvermint, Keith Simmons, Lynne Tirrell. Part-time faculty: *William G. Lycan, Stewart Shapiro (.25 time). Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Damir Dzhafarov, Jon Gajewski, Jane Gordon, Magdalena Kaufmann, Stefan Kaufmann, Reed Solomon. FACULTY # Cornell Faculty: Karen Bennett, Tad Brennan, Harold Hodes, Rachana Kamtekar, Michelle Kosch, Scott MacDonald, Kate Manne, Julia Markovits, Andrei Marmor, Richard W. Miller, Derk Pereboom, Nicholas Silins, William Starr. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Dorit Abusch, Peter Gilgen, Joseph Halpern, Sarah Murray, Anil Nerode, Hayden Pelliccia, David Pizarro, Mats Rooth, Emily Sherwin, Richard Shore, Olúfémi Táíwò. FACULTY # CUNY Faculty: Christa Davis Acampora, Linda Alcoff, Sergei Artemov, *Jeffrey Blustein, *Noel Carroll, Samir Chopra, Alberto Cordero, Omar Dahbour, #Michael Devitt, William Earle, Miranda Fricker, Jonathan Gilmore, Carol Gould, John Greenwood, Stephen Grover, Joel Hamkins, Jonathan Jacobs, Elliott Jurist, Frank Kirkland, Serene Khader, #Saul Kripke, Douglas Lackey, Eric Mandelbaum, Charles Mills, Barbara Montero, Stephen Neale, Angelica Nuozzo, Gary Ostertag, Nickolas Pappas, *Rohit Parikh, Massimo Pigliucci, Gerald Press, *Graham Priest, Jesse J. Prinz, Rosamond Rhodes, *David M. Rosenthal, Steven Ross, Hagop Sarkissian, Sibyl A. Schwarzenbach, Peter P. Simpson, Thomas Teufel, Iakovos Vasiliou, Cathrine Wilson. Part-time faculty: *David Papineau, Catherine Wilson. FACULTY # Duke Faculty: Katherine Brading, Robert Brandon, Felipe de Brigard, Michael Ferejohn, Owen Flanagan, Jennifer Hawkins, Kevin Hoover, Andrew Janiak, Karen Neander, Wayne Norman, Carlotta Pavese, *Alexander Rosenberg, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Gopal Sreenivasan, David Wong. Part-time faculty: *Allen Buchanan, #Peter van Inwagen. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Matthew Adler, Vincent Conitzer, Nita Farahany, Michael Gillespie, Ruth Grant, Daniel McShea, Toril Moi, Dale Purves. FACULTY # Florida State 3 Faculty: Michael Bishop, Randolph Clarke, Marie Fleming, James Justus, Stephen Kearns, Mark LeBar, Simon Cabulea May, Alfred Mele, Maria Morales, J. Piers Rawling, John Roberts, #Michael Ruse, John Schwenkler, Nathanael Stein. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Roy Baumeister, Michael Nair-Collins, Paul Conway, Matthew Day, Svetla Slaveva-Griffin, Martin Kavka, Aline Kalbian, John Kelsay, Fernando Teson, Sumner B. Twiss. FACULTY # Georgetown Faculty: Sean Aas, Francis Ambrosio, William Blattner, David Bronstein, Alisa Carse, Wayne Davis, Bryce Huebner, Rebecca Kukla, Mark Lance, *John Langan, Neil Lewis, Judith Lichtenberg, Margaret Little, David Luban, Huaping Lu-Adler, James Mattingly, Mark Murphy, Terry Pinkard, Madison Powers, Henry Richardson, Nancy Sherman, Karen Stohr, Daniel Sulmasy, #Wilfried ver Eecke, Linda Wetzel, Katherine Withy. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Jason Brennan, Matthew Burstein, Erin M. Cline, John DeGioia (Pres. of Univ.), Heidi Li Feldman, Emma Gannagé, #Rom Harré, John Hasnas, John Keown, Mark MacCarthy, Gerald Mara, John Mikhail, Edward Soule, Carol Taylor. FACULTY # Harvard Faculty: Selim Berker, Cheryl Chen, James Doyle, Warren Goldfarb, Edward S. (Ned) Hall, Rusty Jones, Sean D. Kelly, Peter Koellner, Jeffrey McDonough, Richard A. Moran, Bernhard Nickel, Mark Richard, Susanna Rinard, Jacob Rosen, Gina Schouten, #Amartya Sen, Tommie L. Shelby, Susanna Siegel, Alison Simmons, Lucas Stanczyk, W. Hugh Woodin. Part-time faculty: Christine M. Korsgaard (on phased retirement), Philippe van Parijs. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Gennaro Chierchia, Khaled El-Rouayheb, Reter Galison, Peter Gordon, Parimal Patil, Mathias Risse, Michael Rosen. FACULTY # Illinois/Chicago Faculty: Mahrad Almotahari, Anne W. Eaton, Samuel Fleischacker, Aidan Gray, David Hilbert, Nicholas Huggett, Peter Hylton, Jon Jarrett, Anthony Laden, Constance Meinwald, Marya Schechtman, Sally Sedgwick, Georgette Sinkler, Will Small, Daniel Sutherland, John Whipple. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: David Marker, Deirdre McCloskey, Timothy Murphy. FACULTY # Indiana Faculty: Kate Abramson, Marcia Baron, Jordi Cat, Gary Ebbs, Amit Hagar, Pieter Hasper, Mark
Recommended publications
  • Analyticity, Balance and Non-Admissibility of in Stoic Logic

    Analyticity, Balance and Non-Admissibility of in Stoic Logic

    Susanne Bobzien Analyticity, Balance and Roy Dyckhoff Non-admissibility of Cut in Stoic Logic Abstract. This paper shows that, for the Hertz–Gentzen Systems of 1933 (without Thin- ning), extended by a classical rule T 1 (from the Stoics) and using certain axioms (also from the Stoics), all derivations are analytic: every cut formula occurs as a subformula in the cut’s conclusion. Since the Stoic cut rules are instances of Gentzen’s Cut rule of 1933, from this we infer the decidability of the propositional logic of the Stoics. We infer the correctness for this logic of a “relevance criterion” and of two “balance criteria”, and hence (in contrast to one of Gentzen’s 1933 results) that a particular derivable sequent has no derivation that is “normal” in the sense that the first premiss of each cut is cut-free. We also infer that Cut is not admissible in the Stoic system, based on the standard Stoic axioms, the T 1 rule and the instances of Cut with just two antecedent formulae in the first premiss. Keywords: Sequent, Analyticity, Stoic logic, Proof theory, Decidability, Relevance, Balance, Cut-admissibility. Introduction and Overview There is dispute and uncertainty about the exact details of much of the logic of the Stoics. The primary sources are fragmentary and the secondary sources fail to provide a coherent account. We ignore the Stoics’ modal logic and consider only their propositional logic, which may be regarded as a frag- ment of what we now call classical propositional logic. It is a substructural logic and a relevant logic, with that term broadly conceived: the rule of Thinning is neither present nor admissible and an atom-sharing property, as in [11], i.e.
  • All Souls College

    All Souls College

    All Souls College Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2014 Registered as a Charity in England and Wales, no: 1138057. Registered address: High Street, Oxford OX1 4AL ALL SOULS COLLEGE Year ended 31 July 2014 Table of Contents Pages Report of the Governing Body 2 - 23 Reference and Administrative Information 24 - 27 Auditor’s Report 28 - 29 Principal Accounting Policies 30 - 33 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 34 Consolidated and College Balance Sheets 35 Consolidated Cashflow Statement 36 Notes to the Financial Statements 37 - 57 1 ALL SOULS COLLEGE Report of the Governing Body Year ended 31 July 2014 REPORT OF THE GOVERNING BODY The Warden and Fellows of All Souls College present their Annual Report for the year ended 31 July 2014 under the Charities Act 2011 and the Charities SORP 2005 together with the audited financial statements for the year. INTRODUCTION The College of All Souls of the Faithful Departed, of Oxford – known as All Souls College – was founded by Henry VI and Henry Chichele (Archbishop of Canterbury) in 1438. Today the College is primarily an academic research institution with particular strengths in the Humanities, Mathematics, Social and Natural Sciences and an outstanding library. It also has strong ties to public life. Although the Warden and Fellows of the College are involved in teaching and supervision of research in the University, there are no undergraduate members. On 31 July 2014 there were seventy-seven Fellows of All Souls, twenty-nine Emeritus (i.e. retired academic) and seven Honorary Fellows, many of whose continuing research the College was actively supporting.
  • New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth

    New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth

    UC Irvine Law Review Volume 6 Article 3 Issue 2 The New Legal Realism at Ten Years 6-2016 Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth Elizabeth Mertz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucilr Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Bryant Garth & Elizabeth Mertz, Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond, 6 U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 121 (2016). Available at: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucilr/vol6/iss2/3 This Foreword is brought to you for free and open access by UCI Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UC Irvine Law Review by an authorized editor of UCI Law Scholarly Commons. Garth & Mertz UPDATED 4.14.17 (Do Not Delete) 4/19/2017 9:40 AM Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond Bryant Garth* and Elizabeth Mertz** I. Celebrating Ten Years of New Legal Realism ........................................................ 121 II. A Developing Tradition ............................................................................................ 124 III. Current Realist Directions: The Symposium Articles ....................................... 131 Conclusion: Moving Forward ....................................................................................... 134 I. CELEBRATING TEN YEARS OF NEW LEGAL REALISM This symposium commemorates the tenth year that a body of research has formally flown under the banner of New Legal Realism (NLR).1 We are very pleased * Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law; American Bar Foundation, Director Emeritus. ** Research Faculty, American Bar Foundation; John and Rylla Bosshard Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Many thanks are owed to Frances Tung for her help in overseeing part of the original Tenth Anniversary NLR conference, as well as in putting together some aspects of this Symposium.
  • Distinguishing Science from Philosophy: a Critical Assessment of Thomas Nagel's Recommendation for Public Education Melissa Lammey

    Distinguishing Science from Philosophy: a Critical Assessment of Thomas Nagel's Recommendation for Public Education Melissa Lammey

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Distinguishing Science from Philosophy: A Critical Assessment of Thomas Nagel's Recommendation for Public Education Melissa Lammey Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES DISTINGUISHING SCIENCE FROM PHILOSOPHY: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THOMAS NAGEL’S RECOMMENDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION By MELISSA LAMMEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2012 Melissa Lammey defended this dissertation on February 10, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Michael Ruse Professor Directing Dissertation Sherry Southerland University Representative Justin Leiber Committee Member Piers Rawling Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Warren & Irene Wilson iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is my pleasure to acknowledge the contributions of Michael Ruse to my academic development. Without his direction, this dissertation would not have been possible and I am indebted to him for his patience, persistence, and guidance. I would also like to acknowledge the efforts of Sherry Southerland in helping me to learn more about science and science education and for her guidance throughout this project. In addition, I am grateful to Piers Rawling and Justin Leiber for their service on my committee. I would like to thank Stephen Konscol for his vital and continuing support.
  • PGR Faculty List 2021 ALL Departments 24August2021 Draft

    PGR Faculty List 2021 ALL Departments 24August2021 Draft

    Faculty Lists fall 2021 Email: [email protected] for corrections. Current update: 8/24/2021 #=75 or older in 2021 (* was over 70 in 2017 list) Part-time faculty are half-time, unless otherwise noted. UNITED STATES (the top 50 will be ranked) FACULTY # Arizona Faculty: Sara Aronowitz, Thomas Christiano, Stewart Cohen, Juan Comesaña, Reza Hadisi, RiChard Healey, Laura, Howard, J. Christopher Maloney, MiChael McKenna, Bill OberdiCK, Guido PinCione, Marga Reimer, Daniel Russell, Carolina Sartorio, David SChmidtz, Houston Smit, MarK Timmons, Joseph Tolliver, Jason Turner, Steven Wall, Jonathan Weinberg. Part-time faculty: *Allen Buchanan (.25 time) Cognate faculty and philosophers in other units: Martin FriCKe, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Christopher Robertson, Simone Sepe. FACULTY # Arizona State Faculty: RiChard Amesbury, Brad Armendt, Thomas BlaCKson, Cheshire Calhoun, Peter de Marneffe, Typer DesRoChes, MarCello Di Bello, Peter Kung, Joan MCGregor, Shyam Nair, Ben Phillips, Nestor Ángel Pinillos, Douglas W. Portmore, Maura Priest, Steven Reynolds. Part-time faculty: Cognate faculty and philosophers in other units: RiChard Creath, Tyler DesRoChes, ZaChary Horne, Ted Humphrey, PatriCia J. Huntingon, Manfred LaubiChler, Jane MainesChein, Martin BeCK MatuštíK, Ben A. Minteer, *Jeffrie G. Murphy, BeCKett Sterner, Jason Robert, Hava Tirosh-Samuelson, Norbert Samuelson, BeCKett Sterner. FACULTY # BerKeley Faculty: Olivia Bailey, John Campbell, Timothy ClarKe, Shamik Dasgupta, Johann FriCK, Hannah Ginsborg, Florian Grosser, Wesley H. Holliday, NiKo Kolodny, Geoffrey Lee, John MaCFarlane, Paolo ManCosu, Alva Noë, Andreja NovaKoviC, Kristin Primus, R. Jay WallaCe, Daniel Warren, Seth Yalcin, Xueyin (Snow) Zhang. Part-time Faculty: Joshua Cohen (.25 time), MiChael (M.G.F.) Martin, Veronique Munoz Darde, Kwong-Loi Shun. Cognate Faculty and Philosophers in Other Units: Asad Q.
  • 1 Realism V Equilibrism About Philosophy* Daniel Stoljar, ANU 1

    1 Realism V Equilibrism About Philosophy* Daniel Stoljar, ANU 1

    Realism v Equilibrism about Philosophy* Daniel Stoljar, ANU Abstract: According to the realist about philosophy, the goal of philosophy is to come to know the truth about philosophical questions; according to what Helen Beebee calls equilibrism, by contrast, the goal is rather to place one’s commitments in a coherent system. In this paper, I present a critique of equilibrism in the form Beebee defends it, paying particular attention to her suggestion that various meta-philosophical remarks made by David Lewis may be recruited to defend equilibrism. At the end of the paper, I point out that a realist about philosophy may also be a pluralist about philosophical culture, thus undermining one main motivation for equilibrism. 1. Realism about Philosophy What is the goal of philosophy? According to the realist, the goal is to come to know the truth about philosophical questions. Do we have free will? Are morality and rationality objective? Is consciousness a fundamental feature of the world? From a realist point of view, there are truths that answer these questions, and what we are trying to do in philosophy is to come to know these truths. Of course, nobody thinks it’s easy, or at least nobody should. Looking over the history of philosophy, some people (I won’t mention any names) seem to succumb to a kind of triumphalism. Perhaps a bit of logic or physics or psychology, or perhaps just a bit of clear thinking, is all you need to solve once and for all the problems philosophers are interested in. Whether those who apparently hold such views really do is a difficult question.
  • Contributors' Notes

    Contributors' Notes

    Contributors' Notes Frances E. Dolan is Assistant Professor of English at Miami Univer- sity, Ohio. Her essays have appeared or are forthcoming in Medieval and Renaissance Drama, PMLA, and SEL. She is currently completing a book, DangerousFamiliars: PopularAccounts of Domestic Crime in Eng- land, 1550-1700, of which the present essay is a part. Barbara Taback Schneider is a 1990 graduate of Harvard Law School. She is currently an attorney in Portland, Maine, with the firm of Murray, Plumb & Murray. The paper on which her article was based received the Irving Oberman Memorial Award from the Law School for the best es- say by a graduating law student on a current legal topic. In 1990 that topic was legal history. Brian Leiter is a graduate student in philosophy at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, where he is writing a dissertation on Nietzche's critique of morality. A graduate of Princeton, he also holds a law degree from the University of Michigan and is a member of the New York Bar. John Martin Fischer received his Ph.D. in philosophy from Cornell University in 1982. He taught for seven years in the philosophy depart- ment at Yale University as an assistant and associate professor. He is currently Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, River- side. He has written on various topics in moral philosophy and meta- physics, especially free will and moral responsibility. Recently, he has published a book jointly edited with Mark Ravizza entitled Ethics: Problems and Principles (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1991). Mark Tushnet, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, has written on constitutional law and legal history.
  • Book Reviews Did Formalism Never Exist?

    Book Reviews Did Formalism Never Exist?

    BROPHY.FINAL.OC (DO NOT DELETE) 12/18/2013 9:48 AM Book Reviews Did Formalism Never Exist? BEYOND THE FORMALIST-REALIST DIVIDE: THE ROLE OF POLITICS IN JUDGING. By Brian Z. Tamanaha. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2010. 252 pages. $24.95. Reviewed by Alfred L. Brophy* In Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide, Brian Tamanaha seeks to rewrite the story of the differences between the age of formalism and the age of legal realism. In essence, Tamanaha thinks there never was an age of formalism. For he sees legal thought even in the Gilded Age of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries—what is commonly known as the age of formalism1—as embracing what he terms “balanced realism.”2 Legal history3 and jurisprudence4 both make important use of that divide, or, to use somewhat less dramatic language, the shift from formalism (known often as classical legal thought) to realism. Moreover, as Tamanaha describes it, recent studies of judicial behavior that model the extent to which judges are formalist—that is, the extent to which they apply the law in some neutral fashion or, conversely, recognize the centrality of politics to * Judge John J. Parker Distinguished Professor of Law, University of North Carolina. I would like to thank Michael Deane, Arthur G. LeFrancois, Brian Leiter, David Rabban, Dana Remus, Stephen Siegel, and William Wiecek for help with this. 1. See, e.g., MORTON J. HORWITZ, THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN LAW 1870–1960, at 16–18 (1992) [hereinafter HORWITZ, TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN LAW 1870–1960] (discussing formalism, generally); MORTON J.
  • Staff Magazine for the University of Oxford | October 2014

    Staff Magazine for the University of Oxford | October 2014

    blueprint Staff magazine for the University of Oxford | October 2014 Chu’s views | Vegetables propagate smiles | Women on the wall News in brief u The Dickson Poon University of Oxford u Make sure you’re effectively engaged in China Centre Building was formally opened social media by taking advantage of this by the Duke of Cambridge on 8 September. term’s Engage (#oxengage) programme The centre, which is in the grounds of run by IT Services in partnership with the St Hugh’s College, brings academics with Bodleian Libraries. Now in its third year, an interest in China under the same roof. the programme comprises a series of talks, The five-floor building houses a dedicated seminars and workshops to explore social library and reading room, which will provide media strategies and digital tools, and is a permanent home for 60,000 volumes and designed to inspire academics, researchers UniversityOxford/Jonathanof Hordle a significant part of the Bodleian Libraries’ and graduate students to consider using Chinese book collection. It also features a social media and digital technology to lecture theatre, language laboratory, study develop their online presence for outreach areas and a dining room. The £21m cost was and public engagement. Sessions range from largely met through benefactions, including academic blogging and tweeting to sharing £10m from Hong Kong philanthropist research findings via infographics. View the Mr Dickson Poon CBE. programme at blogs.it.ox.ac.uk/engage/social- media-michaelmas/programme-2014. Robotics Alcock / Ed Aldebaran u 15 September saw the inaugural Oxford India Lecture take place in New Delhi.
  • Marxism and the Continuing Irrelevance of Normative Theory (Reviewing G

    Marxism and the Continuing Irrelevance of Normative Theory (Reviewing G

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2002 Marxism and the Continuing Irrelevance of Normative Theory (reviewing G. A. Cohen, If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? (2000)) Brian Leiter Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian Leiter, "Marxism and the Continuing Irrelevance of Normative Theory (reviewing G. A. Cohen, If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? (2000))," 54 Stanford Law Review 1129 (2002). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEW Marxism and the Continuing Irrelevance of Normative Theory Brian Leiter* IF YOU'RE AN EGALITARIAN, How COME YOU'RE SO RICH? By G. A. Cohen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. 237 pp. $18.00. I. INTRODUCTION G. A. Cohen, the Chichele Professor of Social and Political Theory at Oxford, first came to international prominence with his impressive 1978 book on Marx's historical materialism,1 a volume which gave birth to "analytical Marxism."'2 Analytical Marxists reformulated, criticized, and tried to salvage central features of Marx's theories of history, ideology, politics, and economics. They did so not only by bringing a welcome argumentative rigor and clarity to the exposition of Marx's ideas, but also by purging Marxist thinking of what we may call its "Hegelian hangover," that is, its (sometimes tacit) commitment to Hegelian assumptions about matters of both philosophical substance and method.
  • Law School News

    Law School News

    LAW SCHOOL NEWS Volume 12, No. 25 November 6, 2002 View Past Issues FACULTY WRITINGS Kimberlee Kovach, Ethics for Whom? The Recognition of Diversity in Lawyering: Calls for Plurality in Ethical Considerations and Rules of Representational Work, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION ETHICS: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE 57 (Phyllis Bernard & Bryant Garth eds.; Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association, Section of Dispute Resolution, 2002) Kimberlee Kovach, Enforcement of Ethics in Mediation, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION ETHICS: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE 111 (Phyllis Bernard & Bryant Garth eds.; Washington, D.C.: American Bar Association, Section of Dispute Resolution, 2002) Douglas Laycock, Debate 2: Should the Government Provide Financial Support for Religious Institutions That Offer Faith-Based Social Services?, 3 RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW & RELIGION No. 5 (2001-2002) (with Louis H. Pollack, Glen A. Tobias, Erwin Chemerinsky, Barry W. Lynn, & Nathan J. Diament). Douglas Laycock, Injudicious: Liberals Should Get Tough on Bush's Conservative Judicial Nominees - And Stop Opposing Michael McConnell, THE AMERICAN PROSPECT ONLINE, Oct. 30, 2002, http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2002/10/laycock-d-10-30.html. Brian Leiter, The Fate of Genius, TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, Oct. 18, 2002, at 12 (reviewing Zarathustra's Secret: The Interior Life of Friedrich Nietzsche, by Joachim Köhler; Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography, by Rüdiger Safranski; and The Legend of Nietzsche's Syphilis, by Richard Schain). Ronald Mann, Credit Cards and Debit Cards in the United States and Japan, 55 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 1055 (2002). Jane Stapleton, Lords a'Leaping Evidentiary Gaps, 10 TORTS LAW JOURNAL 276 (2002). FACULTY ACTIVITIES Lynn Baker spoke on "Professional Responsibility: Critical Mass Tort Settlement Considerations" at the Third Annual Class Action/Mass Tort Symposium held by the Louisiana State Bar Association in New Orleans, Oct.
  • Zarathustra's Metaethics

    Zarathustra's Metaethics

    Canadian Journal of Philosophy ISSN: 0045-5091 (Print) 1911-0820 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcjp20 Zarathustra’s metaethics Neil Sinhababu To cite this article: Neil Sinhababu (2015) Zarathustra’s metaethics, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45:3, 278-299, DOI: 10.1080/00455091.2015.1073576 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1073576 Published online: 09 Oct 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 50 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rcjp20 Download by: [NUS National University of Singapore] Date: 13 November 2015, At: 04:45 Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2015 Vol. 45, No. 3, 278–299, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1073576 Zarathustra’s metaethics Neil Sinhababu* Department of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, 3 Arts Link, Singapore 117570, Singapore (Received 29 October 2014; accepted 14 July 2015) Nietzsche takes moral judgments to be false beliefs, and encourages us to pursue subjective nonmoral value arising from our passions. His view that strong and unified passions make one virtuous is mathematically derivable from this subjectivism and a conceptual analysis of virtue, explaining his evaluations of character and the nature of the Overman. Keywords: Nietzsche; Zarathustra; metaethics; virtue; subjectivism; Overman Friedrich Nietzsche may be the most forceful critic of morality in all of philos- ophy. Yet he often ascribes value to actions, characters, and ways of life. How are these evaluative claims consistent with his rejection of morality? This paper argues that while Nietzsche regards moral judgments as false beliefs, he sees passions as making their objects subjectively valuable in a nonmoral way.