OSP Open Event 2015 Report

Paper 3 OSP Open Event 2015 Report

The purpose of this paper is to provide information related to the OSP Open Event 2015 (including feedback received after the event) for discussion in the May 14th OSP meeting that will comprise:

1. A brief review of the objectives and success metrics of the event 2. Deeper discussion of the key challenges set by Will Huton and delegates 3. Consideration of specific suggestions 4. A short discussion about next year’s event

1. A brief review of the objectives and success metrics of the event

The Steering Group had set the following three aims for the Open Event:

1) update a wider audience on progress and future work in relation to OSP vision and priorities 2) allow a wider audience to give feedback, suggest new ideas and offer challenge to the OSP 3) raise the profile of the OSP and work done through sub-groups and partners.

Target Actual Detail 100 attendees 113 Appendix 1 Satisfaction rating 80% 83% Appendix 2 Broad range of interests 39 public sector Appendix 3 and sectors 33 community groups 26 businesses 14 education 9 other

Paper 3 OSP Open Event 2015 Report

2. Deeper discussion of the key challenges set by Will Huton and delegates1

Challenge from Will Hutton Challenge from delegates Overarching  Fantastic work but alarming figures: trends are there  Better explain reasons for major growth push, when key social – current thinking too conventional, not measuring challenges are low wages, high housing prices, transport scale of the challenge congestion (not unemployment): e.g. business rates to fund  Obligation to do better: be smarter, bolder, more services, sustainable / equitable / inclusive growth ambitious Development  Challenge of lack of affordable housing: where will  False assumption made from data showing an increase in within- more housing go? Oxford car commuting that it must lead to an increase in housing  Relax / reposition the Green Belt? within Oxford: city is a political boundary - development in the  Build up? Think high-rise, brilliant architecture green belt should be considered  Planners to be much more demanding of architectural quality in agreeing new developments Economy, incl. transport  Living wage across the city  Better access to finance and greater choice of premises  Could be smartest city in Britain, if not globally: role considered most helpful for start-ups for LEP, universities, OSP  Decent public transport links important to enable across-Oxford  Smart manufacturing and computer science: travel copyright, patents, branding, architecture  Focus on work and employment: also need to discuss leisure  Highest start-up rate in the EU for life/medical parks and open spaces sciences, but few scale up – why? What can be  Welcome encouraging more cycling / walking for commuting and done? would welcome that to be connected to a Green Infrastructure  Space could be available e.g. in Harwell Strategy (green corridors)  Oxford should be hub of network of county towns  Visitor economy: more public toilets, pedestrianized areas and (railway station connection, feeder services) way-finding information considered to make the greatest difference

1 Delegates’ views were captured through recording their votes during the event and feedback afterwards (see Appendix 2 and 4 for details). 2

Paper 3 OSP Open Event 2015 Report

Low Carbon  Decarbonisation: borrow ideas e.g. from  Low carbon development directly relevant to and could feed into Copenhagen with energy districts the solutions for the majority of issues the city faces: transport,  Get rid of waste in constructive way housing, social division and inequality, growth and regeneration  A more balanced approach to sustainability with economy, social and environment: importance of quality environment to people's quality of life and wellbeing (more than Low Carbon)  Communication of this work could be improved by showing how low carbon activities can contribute to both economic growth and the stronger communities agenda  Ruth Mayne (seconded to Low Carbon Hub from ECI) drafting a report showing how carbon reduction investment/activity can contribute to social, economic and health co-benefits (incl. case studies of good practice in Oxford/shire and elsewhere); she will be forming an advisory team for the report  Two thirds not from Low Carbon Pathfinders; others either were or didn’t know  Half confident their organisation will reduce carbon emissions by 3% each year - a fifth each unsure or not aware of emissions  More knowledge and expertise would help most, then better staff engagement, more money, more staff dedicated to reductions, legal changes  Most popular for Low Carbon Week are sustainable market, then creative fun family days, tours of eco-offices Stronger Communities  Mass flourishing, pilot lifelong learning here: give  Social trends analysis suggests there is a gap in the OSP's work: people skills, upgrade, develop them all the time if low wages rather than unemployment is major cause of poverty  Private and public education system to work in the city, then the stronger communities work should focus on together, e.g. make available playing fields improving wages and working conditions, not just service delivery; trade unions should be involved as a partner in the OSP  Work should continue in the same five target wards

Paper 3 OSP Open Event 2015 Report

 Giving children the best start in life needs more attention, then school attainment / adult learning and good work for all  OSP Participation & Engagement Framework useful for a third; half not sure Safer Communities  Lead on tackling the epidemic of white collar crime  Anti-social behaviour (ASB) most visible priority in delegates’ daily  Link to education, IT graduates – make use of the lives skills we have in the locality  Tackling ASB and inter-personal abuse / exploitation considered most important

3. Consideration of specific suggestions

In agreeing its response to these challenges, the OSP may wish to consider specific suggestions that were made on how it develops its work:

 Brainstorm ideas / issues in a smaller, self-selected, more focused group: in that room, there was a great deal of insight / expertise / creativity and perhaps it needs another 'layer' to get those people closer to the 'leads/decision makers'  Perhaps have an opportunity to meet / sit with each speaker for one hour the day after the Open Event or another time  Set up an out of the box thinking think tank group with some of the great innovative thinkers based in Oxford, whose task it is to inform OSP with innovative and smart suggestions how to tackle the challenges ahead  Perhaps more information on how people can get involved, what kind or work others can do to help  Consider how involvement of local businesses and resident groups might be secured to drive progress on the top priorities  OSP needs to be better known to the general public - what it is, what it's doing, and why.

Paper 3 OSP Open Event 2015 Report

4. A short discussion about next year’s event

Delegates raised the following in their feedback (both ratings and free text comments), for the OSP to consider for future events:

Engaging delegates  Voting devices were popular: they worked ‘well’ (37%) or ‘very well’ (50%)  Q&A with the presenters, displays and ‘Meet the champion’ session all worked ‘okay’ (30-45%) or ‘well / very well’ (30-42%); however, 10-12% said these all did work ‘badly / very badly’ for them  30% of those responding said they could not comment on the ‘Meet the champion’ session, indicating this was not taken up by many delegates  Specific suggestions for improvements include: o More time for question sessions, possibly with full panel at the end o Longer networking time for networking (lunch, not early refreshments) o Displays in the same room as the presentation o A group discussion to look at a topic, e.g. next year to look at issues surrounding the development of Barton Park o More opportunity for the audience to provide perspectives on the significance of progress (or potential lack thereof) on priorities, and also whether some alternative approaches might be necessary.

Other points

 Presentation and delegate listing to help networking to go on OSP website  Presentations again received high ratings from the 60 people giving feedback; Will Hutton’s challenge received positive comments too  Ask frontline workers or residents from target areas to help present  Encourage greater attendance from: o diverse communities (a wider spectrum of ethnic, cultural, religious and social groups); thought may need to be given to day / timing of event (weekday morning precludes most working people) o young people, e.g. representatives from each secondary school, universities, colleges.

Kathrin Luddecke, Policy Officer, Policy, Culture & Communications, Oxford City Council

Paper 3 OSP Open Event 2015 Report

Appendix 1: Event attendance

The Group also agreed success measures for the event, which the following table shows have been met.

Target set 2014 benchmark 2015 performance Attendance  Min. 100 people  92 attended (max. for the  113 people attended (70% out of 162 people registered; (target 150) venue) see Annex 2 Delegate Listing)  153 got in touch about the  including apologies 203 people got in touch event  Representing a  A third public sector, third  162 registrations from 112 organisations: 53 public, 46 broad range of voluntary sector / civic society, business, 43 community / voluntary, 19 education, 1 none interests and third business and further /  113 delegates from 64 organisations: 39 public, 26 sectors higher education business, 33 community, 14 education, 1 none* * Approximately 70 delegates ‘voted’ on questions we asked during the event. Based on this sample (62% of attendees; OSP members were not given voting devices): • almost half live and work / study in Oxford • a third work / study here, but live elsewhere • a quarter do not work / study in the city: of these half live in it, half are visitors. Feedback  By participants:  28 provided feedback (30% of  60 people gave feedback online (53% of delegates; see target rating delegates) Annex 1 for details) average 4 out of  Average rating 4.03 out of 5,  Average rating of 4.14 out of 5, made up of 16 individual 5, for individual made up of 9 elements under ratings under 3 headings: parts of the event 3 headings: o Update delegates (presentations): average 4.37/5 and overall aims o Presentations: average 4.22/5 o Elicit views: average 3.4/5 met o Workshops: average 3.79/5 o Organisation: average 4.4/5 o Networking: average 3.8/5

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 2: Delegate feedback We received 60 responses (53% of delegates) to our online survey. Details are as follows.

Question 1:

The Open Event aimed to update you about the Partnership and its work. How well did we do this for each of the following topics?

Option State of the City Economic Safer Stronger Low Carbon Development, Communities Communities Oxford Growth and Regeneration 1 very badly 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 2% (1) 2% (1) 2 badly 0% (0) 2% (1) 0% (0) 2% (1) 7% (4) 3 okay 3% (2) 7% (4) 12% (7) 20% (12) 17% (10) 4 well 12% (7) 32% (19) 27% (16) 27% (16) 38% (23) 5 very well 85% (51) 60% (36) 61% (36) 47% (28) 35% (21) not applicable 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 2% (1) 2% (1)

Question 2:

Another objective of the event was to get your comments and suggestions for the Partnership’s work. We did this in a number of ways. How well did these work for you?

Option Voting on Question and Informal ‘Meet the Displays and questions answer session champion’ information about with presenters session our work 1 very badly 2% (1) 2% (1) 3% (2) 3% (2) 2 badly 2% (1) 8% (5) 7% (4) 10% (6) 3 okay 8% (5) 48% (29) 32% (19) 49% (29) 4 well 37% (22) 30% (18) 22% (13) 19% (11) 5 very well 50% (30) 12% (7) 7% (4) 10% (6) not applicable 2% (1) 0% (0) 30% (18) 8% (5)

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 2: Delegate feedback Question 3:

How well was the Open Event organised, both leading up to and during the event? What did you think of the quality of the venue and other services we used on the day?

Option Invitation to Confirmation Registration Agenda and Refreshments Screen and Venue – register your of booking, on the day timings for microphones overall interest information the day 1 very badly 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 2% (1) 0% (0) 2 badly 0% (0) 2% (1) 0% (0) 3% (2) 0% (0) 12% (7) 2% (1) 3 okay 3% (2) 7% (4) 5% (3) 5% (3) 10% (6) 27% (16) 3% (2) 4 well 30% (18) 28% (17) 30% (18) 32% (19) 25% (15) 32% (19) 39% (23) 5 very well 65% (39) 63% (38) 65% (39) 60% (36) 64% (38) 27% (16) 56% (33) not applicable 2% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 2: Delegate feedback Question 4:

We welcome any other comments (up to 1000 characters) you may have about:

 this year’s Open Event  any future Open Event  Oxford Strategic Partnership and its work in general.

34 of the 60 respondents left comments; these are all shown below.

18 delegates left their name so we could get back to them; 3 of whom did not leave a comment. The names of the other 15 have been added to their responses.

I felt an opportunity was well and truly missed on the Low Carbon front to demonstrate how low carbon development is actually directly relevant to and could feed into the solutions for the majority of the issues the city faces according to all the other speakers - e.g. transport, housing, social division and inequality, growth and regeneration... low carbon is not an alternative to dealing with these issues (which is the way it was framed), but could so easily be framed as an important part of solutions and investment. Very frustrating and disappointing! It should be 'do you care more about economic growth OR low carbon?' - that is a stupid and false question, as shown by the Low Carbon Economy Report - they can be part of the one narrative, not things to chose between.

Peter Creasy: It was a very good explanation and update as to the aims and activities of OSP I thought that Will Hutton posed some very good thoughts and suggestions which I hope will the OSP and OCC will give serious thought .

Emma Tracy: 1) State of the City- excellent, with fantastic data, but a false assumption made from data showing an increase in within Oxford car commuting must lead to an increase in housing within Oxford permeated the rest of the presentations. Gd comment from VSL that Oxford city is a political boundary-development in the green belt should be considered. Decent public transport links are important-travel from East Oxford to North Oxford involves 2 separate bus journeys and a walk in between - hence why people drive.2) it wasn't clear when ordering priorities whether I should be indicating how important a safe community is vs more effort put into making the status quo safer.3) Stronger communities had little information other than a failure to improve the situation of the most critical wards. Overall a poor presentation and disappointing as this is an important priority.4) Is Low Carbon about recycling or transport - inspiring, but empty on content.I had hoped to be able to give more feedback.

Ines Kretzschmar -Good informative event and it was very well timed and organised -I most enjoyed Will Hutton's Challenge and as response OSC might want to consider to set up an out of the box thinking think tank group with some of the great innovative thinkers based in Oxford whose task it is to inform OSC with innovative and smart suggestions how to tackle the challenges ahead -next time please put the screen higher up so that people in the back can see the full slides of the presentation - a longer slot for Q&A after each presentation Will you put the presentations on the OSC website?

Thank You

A lot was packed in to a short period - it worked really well but it might have been nice to have more time for Q & A, with possibly the whole panel at the end?

The event went very well, and there was a very high standard of presentations. Great to see such a good turn out.

Lois Muddiman Good presentations but would have preferred them to be a bit shorter and for the networking coffee break to have been longer. Overall it was too much sitting and listening and not enough meeting and talking

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 2: Delegate feedback

It was a very informative meeting. It is good to be kept informed and given an overall picture, which the participants are not necessarily aware of when working in small groups/sections of the partnership.

It was great - really helpful. Thanks for putting it on and I look forward to next years.

Mike/Speakers and screen view was impossible! not enough space for involvement, some element of workshops breaking the big group down would have helped involvement. a little long time wise

Microphones tended to scream

Enjoyed the presentations - could have had a bit more time for questions. Not sure how valuable the voting is though it does keep everyone awake and give quick snapshots on some issues.

Emma Carney This was a useful event but I feel it would be good to: 1. Have a list of attendees for networking purposes and working in partnerships 2. The main attention was on the state of the City - but we need to look at what to do about it - vision, ways forward. 3. working in partnership was mentioned - perhaps have a few frontline workers speak at the next event about the work they do

Cllr Pat Kennedy More time for Q and A Networking very useful but I did not have time to look at the displays. Lack of ethnic diversity so need to make links with the diverse communities as mentioned in talks. More young people needed-perhaps2 reps from each secondary school and perhaps a couple of House champions from universities.

Survey result on need for public toilets perhaps reflected the demographic of people at the event. Perhaps a group discussion to look at topics.perhaps next year to look at issues surrounding the development of Barton Park.

Focus was on work and employment .we also need to be discussing leisure parks and open spaces.

Jenny Carr Great event - only thing I would change is to either have stalls in same room or to have the networking over a longer coffee break - I felt we missed out on networking and meeting champions by having it at the end when people just left. Voting was really effective- more of this at all events please

The inout at this event and last year's was very helpful. Thank you.

Martin Dare-Edwards I would have appreciated more opportunity for the audience to provide perspectives on the significance of progress (or potential lack thereof) being achieved on the four chosen priorities, and also whether some alternative approaches might be necessary (particularly in the light of Will Hutton's challenge). A key issue is also to consider how greater local business and resident involvement might be secured to drive progress on the top priorities.

Martin Wellings It was a really worthwhile event - thank you!

Louise Wheeler I thought the event was excellent and it is great that OSP are placing focus on communicating their work and aims better and more regularly. Reasons for not answering "very well" at Q2 - Voting - I really liked this but I think the display of the results could be improved. Q and A session - could have done with a little more time for a few of them - but understand it is difficult to judge!

Very informative and enjoyable. John Tanner could have perhaps started by saying what things impact low carbon achievement - he assumed everyone knew. Thanks and well done.

OSP needs to be better known to the general public - what it is, what it's doing, and why.

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 2: Delegate feedback

Not entirely convinced that any of the groups had made any change to the county in the last 12 years , but they were very good at pointing out the problems .

Overall I felt the morning was a waste of my time

The Challenge from Will Hutton was very interesting

Voting on questions worked well in some cases but in others it was more of a gimmick and/or not possible to answer meaningfully without better information being provided. Generally the event was a very welcome opportunity to get an up to date overview of the state of the city and strategy directions and to see/hear some of the leaders in person. The Critical Friend was a good idea but he was not as fully informed on the local situation as he might have been to be able to pass comment on some issues.

Very positive impressions

Richard Venables A very well orgainsed event and use of voting remotes was very interesting. A good showcase for Oxford interms of the good and bad. Didnt really have time to meet the navigators at the end or look in too much detail at the display information. It woudl have been useful to have a delegtes list to see who else was present.

Ruth Mayne It would have been good to have more time for networking next time, and to have stalls at back of hall or somewhere more visible.

The social trends analysis suggests there is a gap in the OSP's work: if the major cause of poverty in the city is low wages rather than unemployment then the stronger communities work should be focused on improving wages and working conditions, not just service delivery, and trade unions should be involved as a partner in the OSP

The economic growth and low carbon presentations could be improved - see supplementary email: Congratulations to all for the Open event ! It was really great. Very informative, good presentations, well run and wonderful to be able to vote.

I have filled in the survey but there wasn’t space for the following comments so am including them here: There seems to be a disjuncture in the OSP work overall. If the major cause of poverty in the city is low wages rather than unemployment then it seems that (a) we do not need such a huge economic growth push and (b) that the either the stronger communities or economic growth work strand should focus on wages/working conditions as well as service delivery, and trade unions should be a key partner in the OSP

There also seems to be a disjuncture between the social trends analysis and the economic growth presentation. As a member of the audience I was left wondering why we were having such a major growth push when the key social challenges we face are low wages, high housing prices and transport congestion, rather than unemployment. It would therefore be helpful if the presentation could have explained (a) how in principle economic growth can contribute to OSP’s overarching aims of improving quality of life/well being (eg through providing business rates for service delivery) (b) how (and indeed whether) in practice it is possible for the OSP/OCC to ensure that the current growth drive helps to address, rather than exacerbate, Oxford’s key social challenges i.e low wages, high housing prices and transport congestion and (c) also emphasise how vital it is that growth is done in a way that is both sustainable and inclusive/equitable.

The communication of the low carbon communications strand of work could also be improved by showing how low carbon activities can contribute to both economic growth and the stronger communities agenda (lots of linkages). This will form the basis of the a report I am producing as part of my secondment with LCO, which I think I have mentioned to you both, and which will build on the low carbon economy report. The report will provide evidence for how carbon reduction investment/activity can contribute to social, economic and health co-benefits, and include case studies of good practice in Oxford/shire and elsewhere. I will be forming an advisory team for the report.

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 2: Delegate feedback

Perhaps the opportunity, the following day/another time, to meet/sit with each speaker for one hour. Brainstorm/ideas/issues in a smaller, self-selected, more focused group. I'm sure that, in that room, there was a great deal of insight/expertise/creativity and perhaps it needs another 'layer' to get those people closer to the 'leads/decision makers'. Could be valuable?

The event was great, the messages from the group were clear and there is obviously a lot of work being done to improve Oxford. Perhaps more information on how people can get involved, what kind or work others can do to help etc.

Very good event. Personally, I would have preferred lunch at the end rather than pastries at the start! This would have allowed more time for networking and meeting the champions and accessing the leaflets. A suggestion for a future event- some residents from the priority areas with their stories, to see how OSP is helping real people ans what else OSP might be able to do.

Ingo Schuder Would welcome a more balanced approach to sustainability with economy-social and environment. Environment is more than Low Carbon and the importance of a quality environment for people's quality of life and well being could feature much stronger (Green Infrastructure, green spaces, urban forestry and creating biodiversity friendly cities; SUDS, green roofs to mitigate air pollution, internationally important natural assets in city; working with Authorities upstream to mitigate flood risk through appropriate tree planting) Welcome what was indicated on encouraging more cycling & walking for commuting and would welcome that to be connected to a Green Infrastructure strategy (green corridors)

A very informative event and the interactive vote made the whole thing a lot more interesting.

The presentations were brillint -- well done.

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 3: Delegate listing

Title First Last Organisation Richard Adams Oxford City Council Sheila Aldred Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust Sarah Anthony Thrive (Innovista) Bart Ashton University of Oxford Rachel Atiyah Oxfordshire County Council Jane Baldwin Oxford Preservation Trust Danielle Battigelli Cowley Road Works Superinten Christian Bunt Thames Valley Police; OSP Safer dent Communities Champion Emma Carney Workers’ Educational Association Jennifer Carr Oxford City Council Cllr Nick Carter Oxfordshire County Council Dr Phil Clare University of Oxford Martin Conway Marriotts Julian Cottee Good Food Oxford Lucie Coussmaker Oxford Hub Peter Creasy Fastflow Group Ltd Geoff Dale Auditel Debbie Dance Oxford Preservation Trust Dr Martin Dare-Edwards Dr Martin Advisory Ltd Tony Davidson Dragon Associates Nicola Davies CONNECT: The Communication Disability Network Maggie Dent Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Placi Espejo Bicester Vision Mrs Ginny Fellows Clarendon Centre Oxford Roger File Blenheim Palace Kevin Flynn Sovereign Housing Cllr Jean Fooks Oxford City Council Tish Francis The Story Museum Mark Fransham Oxford City Council Alison Frecknall Relate Oxfordshire Dr Andy Gilchrist University of Oxford James Golding Oxfordshire County Council Liz Grosvenor Oxford Civic Society / Headington Neighbourhood Forum Dr Anne Gwinnett Oxford Brookes University; OSP Chair Jim Heppell NatWest Robert Hetherington Oxford City Council David Heycock Oxfordshire County Council (Gabby) Tom Hockaday Isis Innovation Ltd Neil Holman Oxford City Council

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 3: Delegate listing

Title First Last Organisation Will Hutton University of Oxford Jacqui Ibbotson Experience Oxfordshire Manizah Imam Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Simon Jaggar Wates Living Space Rachel Jeacock Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Sebastian Johnson Oxford City Council; OSP Manager

Val Johnson Oxford City Council Graham Jones ROX - BACKING OXFORD BUSINESS and Oxford High Street Association Cllr Pat Kennedy Oxford City Council Ines Kretzschmar Leys Housing Consortium , Leys CDI Richard Kuziara Oxfordshire County Council Tom Langley Wates Living Space Cllr Malcolm Leeding Oxfordshire Association of Local Councils Sara Livadeas The Orders of St John Care Trust Kathrin Luddecke Oxford City Council Bryan Marshall Nominet UK Joanna Matthews Unlimited Oxfordshire Ruth Mayne Low Carbon Hub Peter McQuitty Oxford City Council Tim Meredith Hardy Gilbert Walker Tom Morris Oxford City Council Rick Mower Activate Learning, City of Oxford College Lois Muddiman LCO Week 2015 Frank Nigriello Unipart Group Julie Osborne Oxford Fairtrade Coalition and Fairtrade at St. Michaels Kostas Panagiotou Thames Valley Victim Support Maria S Parsons Creative Dementia Arts Network Jonathan Pearson Boswells of Oxford Ltd Dawn Pettis Oxfordshire County Council Cllr Susanna Pressel Oxford City Council Cllr Bob Price Oxford City Council; OSP Economic Development, Growth & Regeneration Champion Dr Andrew Pritchard North Hinksey Parish Council Penny Rinta-Suksi Blake Morgan Solicitors Cllr Rodney Rose Oxfordshire County Council Charles Rowton-Lee Cluttons LLP Fran Ryan Oxfordshire Community Land Trust

Tim Sadler Oxford City Council Vyv Salmon Oxfordshire Community Land Trust

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 3: Delegate listing

Title First Last Organisation Miriam Saxl Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University Dr Ingo Schüder Wild Oxfordshire Maggie Scott Oxfordshire County Council Katie Screaton The Oxford Academy Mandy Scruby Oxfordshire LEP Dr Michael Sibly University of Oxford Margaret Simpson 50+ Network Andrea Siret Oxford Brookes University Peter Sloman Oxford City Council Frank Smith Boswells of Oxford Ltd Phil Southall Oxford Bus Company, Thames Travel and Carousel Buses Jillian Southwell Oxfordshire County Council Amber Sparrowhawk Oxfordshire County Council Dominique Sprake-Harris Science Oxford Cllr John Tanner Oxford City Council; OSP Low Carbon Champion Laurie- Taylor Oxford City Council Jane Patrick Taylor Oxfordshire Mind Helen Thompson Oxford City Council Peter Thompson Oxford Civic Society Gill Tishler Oxford CAB Emma Tracy The Ethical Property Company Limited Richard Venables VSL & Partners Mike Watson Cluttons LLP Rvd Dr Martin Wellings Wesley Memorial Church/Churches Together in Oxfordshire Louise Wheeler Insight Oxford Professor Colin R Whitehouse InnovationsST Ltd Jackie Wilderspin Oxfordshire County Council; OSP Vice Chair and Stronger Communities Champion The Very Robert A Wilkes Church of England Revd Cllr Ruth Wilkinson Oxford City Council Susan Williamson Jane Woodley Oxfordshire Community Foundation Chrissie Wright CONNECT: The Communication Disability Network Jackie Yates Oxford City Council The Oxford Academy The Oxford Academy The Oxford Academy

OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 4: Delegate voting results Approx. 70 delegates (62% of all 113; 82% of 85 non-OSP members who were not voting) voted on questions during the event.

16 OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 4: Delegate voting results

17 OSP Open Event 2015 Appendix 4: Delegate voting results