DOCSLIB.ORG

THE DEMOCRACY SOURCEBOOK Edited by Robert Dahl, Ian Shapiro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE DEMOCRACY SOURCEBOOK Edited by Robert Dahl, Ian Shapiro THE DEMOCRACY SOURCEBOOK edited by Robert Dahl, Ian Shapiro, and Jose Antonio Cheibub The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Contents Introduction IX Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in DEFINING DEMOCRACY Eastern Europe and Latin America 76 Adam Przeworski The Social Contract Democracy's Third Wave 93 Jean-Jacques Rousseau " Samuel P. Huritington Capitalism, Socialism, and South Africa's Negotiated Democracy Transition: Democracy, Opposition, Joseph Schumpeter and the New Constitutional Order 99 Minimalist Conception of Courtney Jung and Ian Shapiro Democracy: A Defense 12 Economic Development and Adam Przeworski Political Regimes 108 Democracy and Disagreement 18 Adam Przeworski, Michael E. Amy Gutmann and Dennis Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Thompson and Fernando Limongi The Voice of the People 25 DEMOCRACY, CULTURE, James S. Fishkin AND SOCIETY 117 Denning and Developing Democracy 29 Larry Diamond The Federalist No. 10 118 James Madison Participation and Democratic Theory 40 The Federalist No. 14 123 Carole Pateman James Madison Polyarchal Democracy 48 The Concept of a Liberal Society 126 Robert Dahl Louis Hartz Pluralism and Social Choice 133 SOURCES OF DEMOCRACY 55 Nicholas R. Miller Political Man: The Social Bases of Consociational Democracy 142 Politics 56 Arend Lijphart Seymour Martin Lipset The Contest of Ideas 147 Social Revolutions in the Modern Donald Horowitz World 65 The State of Democratic Theory 153 Theda Skocpol Ian Shapiro The Impact of Economic Development on Democracy 71 Democracy 157 Robert D. Putnam Rueschemeyer, and John D. Modernization, Cultural Change, Stephens and the Persistence of Traditional Values 168 Ronald Inglehart and Wayne E. Baker Contents Culture and Democracy 181 PRESIDENTIALISM VERSUS Adam Przeworski, Jose Antonio PARLIAMENTARISM 257 Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi The Perils of Presidentialism 258 DEMOCRACY AND Juan Linz -.191 CONSTITUTIONALISM Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult The Federalist No. 23 192 Combination 266 Alexander Hamilton Scott Mainwaring The Federalist No. 47 193 Presidents and Assemblies 272 James Madison Matthew Soberg Shugart and John The Federalist No. 48 195 Carey James Madison Minority Governments, Deadlock The Federalist No. 62 197 Situations, and the Survival of James Madison Presidential Democracies ' 277 Jose Antonio Cheibub The Federalist No. 70 199 Alexander Hamilton Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The The Federalist No. 78 201 Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Alexander Hamilton Solutions 284 Madisonian Democracy 207 Kaare Strom Robert Dahl Institutional Design, Party Systems, A Bill of Rights for Britain 217 and Governability: Differentiating Ronald Dworkin the Presidential Regimes of Latin America 296 A Rights-Based Critique of Joe Foweraker Constitutional Rights 221 Jeremy Waldron Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in The Political Origins of Judicial Brazil 304 Empowerment through Argelina Cheibub Figueiredo and Constitutionalization: Lessons from Fernando Limongi Four Constitutional Revolutions 232 Ran Hirschl REPRESENTATION 311 Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Representative Government 312 Policymaker 246 John Stuart Mill Robert Dahl On Elections 315 Democratic Justice 252 Marquis de Condorcet Ian Shapiro Liberalism against Populism 317 William H. Riker Contents Saving Democracy from Political Inside Campaign Finance: Myths Science 321 and Realities 408 Gerry Mackie Frank J. Sorauf Unlikelihood of Condorcet's DEMOCRACY'S EFFECTS 419 Paradox in a Large Society 326 A. S. Tangian The Economics and Politics of Congruence between Citizens and Growth 420 Policymakers in Two Visions of Karl de Schweinitz, Jr. Liberal Democracy 330 Rent Seeking and Redistribution John D. Huber and G. Bingham under Democracy versus Powell, Jr. Dictatorship 427 The Political Consequences of Ronald Wintrobe Electoral Laws 343 Dictatorship, Democracy, and Douglas W. Rae Development 436 South Africa's Negotiated Mancur Olson Transition: Democracy, Opposition, Freedom Favors Development 444 and the New Constitutional Order 350 Amartya Sen Courtney Jung and Ian Shapiro Political Regimes and Economic The Representation of Women 354 Growth 447 Anne Phillips Adam Przeworski, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, INTEREST GROUPS 363 and Fernando Limongi The Governmental Process: Political Democracy in America 455 Interests and Public Opinion 364 Alexis de Tocqueville David B. Truman Does Democracy Engender Justice? 459 The Logic of Collective Action: John E. Roemer Public Goods and the Theory of Facing up to the American Dream: Groups 372 Race, Class, and the Soul of the Mancur Olson Nation 463 Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Jennifer L. Hochschild Pluralism I and Pluralism II 381 Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and John F. Manley Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in . The Theory of Economic Regulation 393 America 480 George J. Stigler Rogers M. Smith Interest Intermediation and Regime DEMOCRACY AND THE Governability in Contemporary GLOBAL ORDER 489 Western Europe and North America 398 Philippe C. Schmitter Perpetual Peace 490 Immanuel Kant Contents viii How Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations Create a System for Peace 492 Bruce Russett Dirty Pool 497 Donald P. Green, Soo Yeon Kim, and David H. Yoon Democracy and Collective Bads 504 Russell Hardin Representation and the Democratic Deficit 510 Pippa Norris The Transformation of Political Community: Rethinking Democracy in the Context of Globalization 516 David Held Appendix 527 Index 535.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Democracy's Value
    Democracy's Value Edited by Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-CordoÂn published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, CB2 2RU, UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011±4211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia # Cambridge University Press 1999 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1999 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in 10/12pt Plantin [ce] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 521 64357 0 hardback ISBN 0 521 64388 0 paperback Contents List of contributors page xi Preface xiii 1. Promises and disappointments: reconsidering democracy's value 1 ian shapiro and casiano hacker-cordOÂ n Part I: Minimal democracy 21 2. Minimalist conception of democracy: a defense 23 adam przeworski 3. Does democracy engender justice? 56 john e. roemer 4. Democracy and other goods 69 partha dasgupta and eric maskin Part II: Beyond minimalism 91 5. Democracy and development: a complex relationship 93 pranab bardhan 6. Death and taxes: extractive equality and the development of democratic institutions 112 margaret levi 7. Democracy and development? 132 john dunn 8. State, civil society, and social justice 141 iris marion young 9. Republican freedom and contestatory democratization 163 philip pettit ix x Contents 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Shapiro Against Impartiality, December 8, 2015
    Against Impartiality Ian Shapiro Journal of Politics, forthcoming 2016 Iustitia, the goddess of justice, holds a sword in her right hand and a set of scales in her left. The sword represents the power to punish, while the scales, held slightly above it, signal that fair weighing of the merits comes first. But it is the blindfold, common in depictions of her since the sixteenth century, that proclaims her impartiality. Lady Justice is blind. 1 She screens out any risk of favoritism, special pleading, or irrelevant distraction so as to render decisions that embody unbiased reason. It is this image of justice as, above all, impartial that many in our generation of political philosophers have found alluring. In my view they are misguided. Lady Justice is indeed blind; she cannot help us see what justice is or what it requires. My goal is to establish that arguments about the justice of political arrangements do not turn in any important way on the idea of impartiality. To the extent that impartiality does play a role, this is either in the application of ideas about justice that have been defended on some other grounds, or impartiality turns out on inspection to be a stalking horse for those other grounds. Put differently, disagreements about the justice of political arrangements cannot be settled by appeal to impartiality. Rather, hostility to domination, or something close to it, usually does the heavy lifting. If I am right, people would do better to recognize that debates about impartiality are confusing red herrings and focus instead on the sources of domination and the means of preventing it.
    [Show full text]
  • John Locke's Democratic Theory Book Title
    Princeton University Press Chapter Title: John Locke’s Democratic Theory Book Title: The Real World of Democratic Theory Book Author(s): Ian Shapiro Published by: Princeton University Press. (2011) Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s2q9.5 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Princeton University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Real World of Democratic Theory This content downloaded from 106.207.24.169 on Mon, 06 Apr 2020 08:21:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms CHAPTER ONE John Locke’s Democratic Theory Introduction The democratic tradition has ancient origins, but contemporary for- mulations are generally traced to Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s discussion of the general will in The Social Contract , published in 1762. Joseph Schumpeter went so far as to characterize Rousseau’s account as the “classical” theory of democracy, even though his was really a neoclassi- cal view—an eighteenth-century adaptation of the ancient Greek theory in which democracy had meant ruling and being ruled in turn. 1 Many commentators have followed Schumpeter’s lead in treating Rousseau as the father of modern democratic theory, yet it is my argument here that John Locke merits the distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8pj296m6 Author Hallock, Emily Rachel Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Emily Rachel Hallock 2013 © Copyright by Emily Rachel Hallock 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Between Anarchy and Leviathan: A Return to Voluntarist Political Obligation by Emily Rachel Hallock Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Carole Pateman, Chair No defense of the liberal-democratic state can do without political obligation, yet existing theories cannot provide a successful account of political obligation. Existing accounts of obligation cannot parry critiques from rival theories, nor refute philosophical anarchists’ formidable attack on obligation. To move discussion of obligation forward, this dissertation offers an alternative solution to what George Klosko has called the ‘voluntarist paradox’ of liberal-democratic political obligation. While liberal ideas about the individual require that any obligation to obey be assumed through a voluntary act, individuals do not voluntarily assume obligations frequently enough to support legitimacy claims. In response to this paradox, most scholars deploy non-voluntary justifications for a general obligation to obey, while philosophical anarchists deny that such an obligation exists at all. In contrast, I argue that overcoming the voluntarist paradox requires a radically different view of the aims and scope of political obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Shapiro Vita March 2016
    March 2016 CURRICULUM VITAE: IAN SHAPIRO The Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center ( (203) 432-9368 for International and Area Studies at Yale (4 (203) 432-6196; 432-9383 P.O. Box 208206 : [email protected] 34 Hillhouse Avenue http://shapiro.macmillan.yale.edu New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8206 EMPLOYMENT Yale University, Department of Political Science Assistant Professor, 1984; Associate Professor, 1988; Professor, 1992 William R. Kenan, Jr., Professor of Political Science, 2000 Sterling Professor of Political Science, 2005 Chairman, January 1999 – June 2004 Other Yale appointments Henry R. Luce Director, The MacMillan Center, 2004- Director, Program in Ethics, Politics, and Economics, 1992-98; 2000-01 Professor, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, 1992- Professor, Yale School of Management, 2013 - 2018 Professor (Adjunct) Yale Law School, 2004- PERSONAL INFORMATION Born September 29, 1956, Johannesburg, South Africa. Dual U.S. and South African citizen Two children: Xan (b. 1986) and Yani (b. 1987) QUALIFICATIONS J. D. Yale Law School 1987 Ph.D., with distinction, Yale University (Political Science) 1983 M. Phil., Yale University (Political Science) 1980 B.Sc. (Hons.) Bristol University, U.K. (Philosophy & Politics) 1978 INTELECTUAL BIOGRAPY David Switzer and Elizabeth Ellis, “Ian Shapiro,” The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, ed. by Michael Gibbons (John Wiley & Sons, 2015) http://shapiro.macmillan.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Shapirointellectualbiography.pdf PRINCIPAL PUBLICATIONS Books Democracy and Distribution. Under
    [Show full text]
  • PLSC 408 /EP&E400/ MGT 660: Capitalism As a Political Order
    PLSC 408 /EP&E400/ MGT 660: Capitalism as a Political Order Yale University, Fall 2011 Wednesday 3:30-5:20pm, RKZ 102 Ian SHapiro Douglas Rae Office Hours: Tuesdays, 1:45-3:45pm Office Hours: Wednesday, 9:00-11:45am 34 Hillhouse, Room 110 56 Hillhouse Avenue, Room 209 432-9368; [email protected] 203-887-2338, [email protected] Douglas Rae’s Assistant: Camille Costelli 203.432.8911 [email protected] Course Description In this seminar we will examine the relations between capitalism and the political orders with which it lives in tension—sometimes creative, sometimes destructive. The first third of the course will be concerned with classic treatments of subject from Smith to Schumpeter. The middle third will deal with contemporary writings on capitalism and democratic regulation, with particular attention to the ways in which apparently technical matters conceal political conflicts and choices. The final third will focus particularly on the financial sector, with attention to the lessons to be gleaned from the political and social responses to the global credit crisis of 2008-10. An intensive case study of the relationship between high-powered financial institutions and the political elites and central banks of major western countries will be a major focus of this segment. Requirements: Students will be expected to write either two 10 page papers (one due by midterm, the other at the end of the semester), or a 20 page research paper. Students who choose the second option must discuss a one- to two-page paper prospectus with the instructor and submit it for approval ahead of time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Law Critique of Deliberative Democracy A
    SELF-CONTRADICTIONS AND MORALITY: A NATURAL LAW CRITIQUE OF DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Robert W. Sidwell June 2007 Abstract Should democracy itself be a value worth striving for? If so, should it take precedence over other values? Is it possible to “add” democracy to a list of these other valuables and treat them all as equally good? Finally, how did the Framers of the United States Constitution view democracy, and why? This thesis seeks to answer these questions. It argues that theories of natural law, not deliberative or direct democracy, offer a level of theoretical precision and protection for human rights and freedoms that democracy cannot be safely trusted to do if it is without the guidance of such a law. This thesis utilizes such natural law theories as those of St. Thomas Aquinas and John Locke to critique deliberative democratic theories, and concludes that democracy has been seen as usually good, but never as an end-in-itself, and thus only as an instrumental end for fulfilling some other good. 3 Table of Contents Page Abstract............................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JPS Volume 19 Issue 4 Cover and Back Matter
    New in 1989- THEORETICAL POLITICS A New Quarterly Political Science Journal Edited by Richard Kimber University of Keele, Jan-Erik Lane University of Umea and Elinor Ostrom Indiana University The Journal of Theoretical Politics is a major new international journal, one of the principal aims of which is to foster the development of theory in the study of the political processes. It will provide a forum for the publication of original papers seeking to make genuinely theoretical contributions to the study of politics. The journal will include rigorous analytical articles on a range of theoretical topics. In particular it will focus on new theoretical work which is broadly accessible to social scientists and contributes to our understanding of political processes. It will also include original sysntheses of recent theoretical developments in diverse fields. The journal will not favour any specific theoretical perspective, but will emphasise the general importance of theory in political science. It will also encourage articles which evaluate the relative merits of competing theories to explain empirical phenomena. The Journal of Theoretical Politics will be published quarterly in January, April, July and October Subscription Rates, 1989 Institutional Individual one year £48.00($72.00) £22.00($33.00) two years £95.OO($I42.5O) £44.00($66.00) single copies £13.00(519.50) £6.00($9.00) SAGE Publications Ltd, 28 Banner Street, London EC IY 8QE SAGE Publications Ltd, PO Box 5096, Newbury Park, CA 91359, USA Cambridge Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought Edited by RAYMOND GEUSS, QUENTIN SKINNER and RICHARD TUCK This major new series will make available to students and teachers all the important texts required for an understanding of the history of political thought.
    [Show full text]
  • APSA Contributors AS of NOVEMBER 10, 2014
    APSA Contributors AS OF NOVEMBER 10, 2014 This list celebrates the generous contributions of our members in Jacobson Paul Allen Beck giving to one or more of the following programs from 1996 through 2014: APSA awards, programs, the Congressional Fellowship Pro- Cynthia McClintock John F. Bibby gram, and the Centennial Campaign. APSA thanks these donors for Ruth P. Morgan Amy B. Bridges ensuring that the benefi ts of membership and the infl uence of the Norman J. Ornstein Michael A. Brintnall profession will extend far into the future. APSA will update and print T.J. Pempel David S. Broder this list annually in the January issue of PS. Dianne M. Pinderhughes Charles S. Bullock III Jewel L. Prestage Margaret Cawley CENTENNIAL CIRCLE Offi ce of the President Lucian W. Pye Philip E. Converse ($25,000+) Policy Studies Organization J. Austin Ranney William J. Daniels Walter E. Beach Robert D. Putnam Ben F. Reeves Christopher J. Deering Doris A. Graber Ronald J Schmidt, Sr. Paul J. Rich Jorge I. Dominguez Pendleton Herring Smith College David B. Robertson Marion E. Doro Chun-tu Hsueh Endowment Janet D. Steiger for International Scholars Catherine E. Rudder Melvin J. Dubnick and Huang Hsing Kay Lehman Schlozman Eastern Michigan University Foundation FOUNDER’S CIRCLE ($5,000+) Eric J. Scott Leon D. Epstein Arend Lijphart Tony Affi gne J. Merrill Shanks Kathleen A. Frankovic Elinor Ostrom Barbara B. Bardes Lee Sigelman John Armando Garcia Beryl A. Radin Lucius J. Barker Howard J. Silver George J. Graham Leo A. Shifrin Robert H. Bates William O. Slayman Virginia H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Theory of Carole Pateman Anne Phillips, London School of Economics John Medearis, University of California, Riverside Daniel I
    820 106th Annual 829 Ralph Bunche Meeting 830 Congressional 823 New APSA Of- Fellowship Association News ficers Elected 837 Attending Grad- 824 Briefs uate Students 826 Center Page 839 Goodnow Award 828 Washington 840 Organized Sec- Insider tion Awards profile The Political Theory of Carole Pateman Anne Phillips, London School of Economics John Medearis, University of California, Riverside Daniel I. O’Neill, University of Florida arole Pateman is, by any mea- Academy of Arts and Sciences, the Academy sure, an extraordinary politi- of Social Sciences (U.K.), and the Academy cal thinker. She has written of Social Sciences in Australia. Long before modern classics of both demo- she assumed the presidency of the APSA, she cratic and feminist theory, but served as the first woman president of the Cthe scope of her work is even wider than International Political Science Association this dual accomplishment suggests, since from 1991 to 1994, and her tenure in that it includes contributions to the study of position is still remembered and admired. early modern political thought, early femi- Guillermo O’Donnell, the noted compara- nist thought, and, recently, the history of tivist, told us that he “was delighted that colonialism. The reach of her influence is she was [his] successor as president of the proportionately wide, touching all of the International Political Science Association, social sciences and humanities and extend- where she left the important mark of her ing to scholars around the globe. She is open-minded and progressive spirit.” perhaps best known for writing Participa- Such scholarly acclaim would probably tion and Democratic Theory (1970) and The have seemed an unlikely future for a girl born Sexual Contract (1988).
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Science 400: a 20-Year Update
    The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update Natalie Masuoka, University of California, Irvine Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine Scott L. Feld, Purdue University In academia, citation is the sincerest this data by subfield, by cohort, and by scholar’s total number of publications in form of flattery.—A Wuffle ~1986! gender. In the next paper of the series, to the discipline’s most prestigious aca- be published in the April 2007 issue of demic journals ~e.g., Robey 1979; Mor- PS, we explore the history of the disci- gan and Fitzgerald 1977; Bayard and his essay is the first of a planned pline in quantitative terms by examining Mitchell 1998; and McCormick and Rice three-part series dealing with quanti- T the changes in departmental Ph.D. pro- 2001!.2 However, these studies do not tative indicators of continuity and change duction and placement rates over the last provide the publication data of individual in the political science discipline, focus- century and look at patterns of cross- scholars since their purpose is to rank ing on the period since 1960. The series departmental hiring. Paper three of the and compare departments. is inspired by the work of Somit and series, to be published in the July 2007 The most recent work dealing with Tanenhaus ~1967! which presented repu- issue of PS, compares various ranking scholarly visibility and impact ~especially tational rankings of both departments and approaches in order to examine the visi- that on the sociology of the natural sci- individuals. For this series of essays, we bility and impact of Ph.D.-granting de- ences! makes use of the citation data created a unique database in which we partments.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Theory and the Commons: Conceptualizing the Relationship Between Deliberation, Publics, and the Internet
    DEMOCRATIC THEORY AND THE COMMONS: CONCEPTUALIZING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DELIBERATION, PUBLICS, AND THE INTERNET by SPENCER MCKAY B.Soc.Sc, University of Ottawa, 2012 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2013 © Spencer McKay, 2013 Abstract I aim to achieve two complementary goals in this paper. The first is to provide a corrective to the unfortunate tendency to insist that the internet’s natural form is a public that underwrites democracy. Rather, the structure of the internet is contingent and any publicness should be understood as enabled by its structural features as a commons. The second goal is a step towards addressing the relative dearth of explicit theorizing about the commons in political science. I adopt a critical approach to understanding technology to make clear that the internet may transform persons and institutions in ways that support democratic properties, but there is a need to challenge common assumptions that any democratic effects of the internet are inherent or directly caused. Many theories of online politics miss the fact that the internet’s structural features suggest that it is better understood as a commons — that is, vulnerable to enclosure and spoilage — than as a public or a democracy. The technological developments of the internet upset the traditional allocative roles of states and markets in reference to physical goods, intangible goods, and the means of production. The internet enables an increase in the scope and scale of the commons paradigm such that the problem of democracy online seems not to be one of too much participation, but too little.
    [Show full text]