Aquatic Organisms 9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aquatic Organisms 9 Aquatic organisms “Is ditch water dull? Naturalists with microscopes have told me that it teems with quiet fun.” 9 — G.K. Chesterton healthy stream is a highly diversified the quality of available water. Fish occupy an ecosystem. Its complex food chain ranges important position in the aquatic food chain and A from microscopic diatoms and algae to obtain their food supply from several sources. large fish, birds and mammals. The diversity of The amount of food available in a stream is species, particularly aquatic organisms, and their determined by the physical and biological condi- numbers are important to any stream study for tions of the area. When producers are plentiful, two reasons: consumers also flourish. Diatoms coating a rock • as indicators of water quality in the stream feed primary consumers such as mayflies. They, and in turn, feed higher-order consumers like stoneflies and fish. • as parts of various food chains, including Overhanging Vocabulary fish. vegetation supplies a benthic A wide variety of organisms inhabit water. variety of terrestrial hyporheic The size and diversity of a population depend on insects to the menu. plankton Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Aquatic organisms • 307 Many aquatic insects use streamside vegetation underground and under-river ecosystem. These during emergence and adult stages of their life organisms contribute to the health and productiv- cycle. ity of the river by supporting the aquatic food Some aquatic insects leave their positions chain that extends to and beyond the water’s among boulders and gravel in riffles and are surface. carried downstream short distances before reat- taching to the stream bottom. When insects are moving in a water column, as drift or during The diversity of species, emergence, they are most vulnerable to being eaten. particularly aquatic organisms Benthic (bottom dwelling) organisms are found on stones or in mud or vegetation. Because and their numbers, are a streambed serves as a place for attachment, most organisms in a fast-moving stream will be important to any stream. benthic. Organisms in fast water have many special- ized methods for obtaining food. To gather food Evidence suggests that hyporheic (from in a water column, they grasp it quickly or filter Greek for “below” and “flow”) exchange is it from the water while remaining stationary. significant in large streams, like the Santiam Others gather food on the bottom. River of Oregon’s Willamette Valley. Some Plankton can be producers or consumers and scientists feel the stability of many streams may float or swim freely throughout a stream. Few depend largely on these hyporheic zones, which organisms can live in rapid sections of streams exchange water and materials with the river without being swept downstream by the current. channel. The hyporheic zone may extend 15 feet Consequently, plankton are abundant in slower to 30 feet below the river bottom and two miles waters of large streams and rivers. to either side of the river. Stream ecologists have found a complex The knowledge of hyporheic zones, and the community of small animals living in the ground organisms found there, challenges traditional water below the stream channel and sometimes views of how rivers work. It may have an effect for miles on each side. Many types of small blind on river system assessments. It could also mean shrimp, primitive worms, bacteria, algae, and that measures to protect streams from pollution various kinds of immature insects live most, if or alteration may need expansion to include not all, of their lives in a maze of channels in this wider areas along the watercourses. 308 • The Stream Scene: Watersheds, Wildlife and People Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Food processing “And in the water winding weeds move round.” 9.1 —Wallace Stevens n autumn, forest floors are piled high with Functional feeding groups leaves. But in spring, the Earth’s load is light- What or who is responsible for all this aerobic ened; the leafy carpet has worn thin and I decomposition? Leaf litter can be broken down seems to disappear with the melting snow. Where and decomposed slowly by abrasion and micro- have the leaves gone? Those that stay where they bial action, but streams also harbor invertebrates fall are decomposed, for the most part, by soil invertebrates and microbes. But many of the “disappearing leaves” are carried down hill slopes into small, heavily canopied forest streams. What is important is Most leaves and other organic materials blown by the wind, washed from the surrounding not so much what, landscape, or fallen directly from overhanging but how the animals eat. limbs into watercourses do not get very far. They are trapped by rocks, logs and branches close to where they entered the water. They become part of the food or energy base of the stream. that help decompose leaves and other organic Some of this material settles out in pools and materials under a variety of conditions. A rich, backwaters. Leaves that get buried will decom- diverse population of aquatic insects is keyed to pose anaerobically. Because anaerobic processes the varied quality of this food base. are much slower than aerobic ones, buried leaves Although most of us have seen our share of remain intact longer. These leaves can be recog- crayfish and snails, other aquatic invertebrates, a nized by their black color. Eventually the buried bit smaller and often a bit quicker, can easily leaves are re-exposed, and decomposition contin- elude us. The aquatic invertebrates we are inter- ues aerobically, much as if they had never been ested in here are inconspicuous aquatic insect buried. larvae and nymphs (immature forms). It is hard to distinguish one species from another at this Vocabulary aerobic gatherers This section is adapted from “Turning Over a anaerobic predators Wet Leaf,” by Rosanna Mattingly, and used with permission from The Science Teacher, collectors scrapers September 1985. filters shredders Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Food processing • 309 immature stage, and the nymphs’ names are and fruits—by biting into them or by cutting or based, in general, on their adult characteristics. boring through them. These insects are called So, rather than identify these animals individu- shredders. Shredders generally reduce whole ally, we can group them according to the mode of leaves to masses of small particles, but they often feeding for which each animal is adapted. What leave the midrib and veins intact. Thus, they is important is not so much what, but how the “skeletonize” the leaves. Many shredders prefer animals eat, hence the distinct functional feeding leaves that have been partially decomposed by groups. microbes; with microbial decomposition, leaves become tender and digestible. Shredders In the Pacific Northwest, litter from many Some aquatic invertebrates feed on leaves or soft-leaved shrubs is quickly colonized by mi- other organic material—such as wood, needles crobes. This microbe conditioning makes leaves Figure 11. Food Processing in Streams Direction of energy flow or "eaten by" SUN Contributes to FPOM Food source Feeding group Coarse Particulate Fine Particulate Organic Matter Organic Matter (CPOM) (FPOM) leaves, needles, cones, fecal pellets, plant and twigs fragments Algae (mostly green algae and Bacteria and Bacteria and diatoms) other microbes other microbes Shredders Collectors Scrapers Examples: Examples: Examples: Organic case caddis Net-spinning caddis Minneral case caddis RIPARIAN PLANTS RIPARIAN Craneflies Midge larvae Snails Dull color stoneflies Blackfly larvae Mayflies Most often found: Mayflies Most often found: Leaf packs Most often found: Rocks Water-logged wood On rocks and in mud Open-canopied areas Headwater streams Lower stream reaches Mid-stream reaches Predators Examples: Mottled stoneflies, beetle larvae, dragonfly larvae, free-living caddis, fish Most often found: Throughout stream Adapted from: Ken Cummins, “From Headwater Streams to Rivers,” American Biology Teacher, May 1977, p. 307. 310 • The Stream Scene: Watersheds, Wildlife and People Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife into palatable, nourishing invertebrate meals filterers and gatherers feed, at least for short before most other leaves are ready. Though they periods, on particles of little or no nutritional are somewhat slower to decompose than herba- value. Apparently, some appear to pay no atten- ceous leaves, alder leaves are also a favorite. tion to what they are eating. Other types of leaves must remain in a stream Filter feeders include blackfly larvae— longer before they become soft enough for the elongate animals that are bulbous near the bot- animals to eat, so shredders end up with a “time- tom end where they attach themselves to stream release” menu. substrates. Blackfly larvae have fans with which they strain particles from the water column. These fans are coated with a sticky substance that catches small particles that would otherwise pass through their fans. Collectors are often more Freshwater clams feed in a similar manner by abundant than shredders in passing food over mucous-covered gills that filter out small food particles. Some free-living low-gradient streams. caddisflies spin nets of various mesh sizes and thereby selectively collect particles of certain By chewing on leaves, shredders expose leaf surfaces and edges to further attack by microbes. In streams, organic materials Shredders also biochemically alter organic sub- are produced, received, strates as the material passes through their diges- tive tracts. So, shredders excrete material usually stored and decomposed. composed of particles that are smaller and of a different quality than what they ate. Many stonefly and caddisfly larvae are shredders. Caddisflies are especially intriguing sizes. Mayfly nymphs and beetle and fly larvae because many use the same leaf bits and other are particularly abundant gathering collectors. organic fragments they eat to construct the cases Collectors are often more abundant than in which they live. shredders in low-gradient streams where fine particles are not washed away so rapidly.
Recommended publications
  • Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R
    Author Exchange Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R. Venema A Reply to Meyer Dennis R. Venema Weizsäcker’s book The World View of Physics is still keeping me very busy. It has again brought home to me quite clearly how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know; God wants us to realize his presence, not in unsolved problems but in those that are solved. Dietrich Bonhoeffer1 am thankful for this opportunity to nature, is the result of intelligence. More- reply to Stephen Meyer’s criticisms over, this assertion is proffered as the I 2 of my review of his book Signature logical basis for inferring design for the in the Cell (hereafter Signature). Meyer’s origin of biological information: if infor- critiques of my review fall into two gen- mation only ever arises from intelli- eral categories. First, he claims I mistook gence, then the mere presence of Signature for an argument against bio- information demonstrates design. A few logical evolution, rendering several of examples from Signature make the point my arguments superfluous. Secondly, easily: Meyer asserts that I have failed to refute … historical scientists can show that his thesis by not providing a “causally a presently acting cause must have adequate alternative explanation” for the been present in the past because the origin of life in that the few relevant cri- proposed candidate is the only known tiques I do provide are “deeply flawed.” cause of the effect in question.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG RIVER ECOSYSTEM: Program 2
    BIG RIVER ECOSYSTEM: A Question of Net Worth PURPOSE To explore biodiversity at the ecosystem level. KERA CONNECTIONS to Life Science Program 2 Core Content: Structure and Function in Living Systems Academic Expectations: 2.2 Patterns, 2.3 Systems, 2.4 Models & Scale ANSWERS TO Process Skills: Observation, Modeling aFIELD NOTES OBJECTIVES 1. In a hot and hostile environment, Students should be able to: the evaporated water cannot be 1.identify five “big river” organisms incorporated into living cells (as 2.construct a diagram showing interactions between living and we know them). nonliving parts of an ecosystem 2. An extremely cold environment, 3. discuss factors that affect the level of biodiversity in their river basin. or frozen desert, does not allow cells to utilize water. VOCABULARY 3. Answers will vary but should Teachers may wish to discuss the following terms: display logical flow of water and aquatic, commercial, ecosystem, water cycle and watershed. allow for recirculation in a loop. 4. Arteries and veins. aFIELD NOTEBOOK 5. A pumping heart. Ideas for Teachers 6. Diagram A shows many different A. Develop a concept map for the water cycle. Include these items in types of ecosystems in close the concept map: clouds, groundwater, apple tree, stream, precipita- proximity. tion, condensation, evaporation, harvest mouse, snowflakes, sun and 7. Add a watering hole, plant a humans. What other cycles are needed to maintain an ecosystem? miniature forest, create a B. Biospheres, containing algae, brine shrimp and water, are often meadow of wildflowers. Most shown in advertisements. Analyze how the biosphere is self-main- importantly, break up a monocul- taining.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Eutrophication on Stream Ecosystems
    EFFECTS OF EUTROPHICATION ON STREAM ECOSYSTEMS Lei Zheng, PhD and Michael J. Paul, PhD Tetra Tech, Inc. Abstract This paper describes the effects of nutrient enrichment on the structure and function of stream ecosystems. It starts with the currently well documented direct effects of nutrient enrichment on algal biomass and the resulting impacts on stream chemistry. The paper continues with an explanation of the less well documented indirect ecological effects of nutrient enrichment on stream structure and function, including effects of excess growth on physical habitat, and alterations to aquatic life community structure from the microbial assemblage to fish and mammals. The paper also dicusses effects on the ecosystem level including changes to productivity, respiration, decomposition, carbon and other geochemical cycles. The paper ends by discussing the significance of these direct and indirect effects of nutrient enrichment on designated uses - especially recreational, aquatic life, and drinking water. 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Stream processes Streams are all flowing natural waters, regardless of size. To understand the processes that influence the pattern and character of streams and reduce natural variation of different streams, several stream classification systems (including ecoregional, fluvial geomorphological, and stream order classification) have been adopted by state and national programs. Ecoregional classification is based on geology, soils, geomorphology, dominant land uses, and natural vegetation (Omernik 1987). Fluvial geomorphological classification explains stream and slope processes through the application of physical principles. Rosgen (1994) classified stream channels in the United States into seven major stream types based on morphological characteristics, including entrenchment, gradient, width/depth ratio, and sinuosity in various land forms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Kingdom
    INTRODUCTION Fungi—The Hidden Kingdom OBJECTIVE • To provide students with basic knowledge about fungi Activity 0.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The following text provides an introduction to the fungi. It is written with the intention of sparking curiosity about this GRADES fascinating biological kingdom. 4-6 with a K-3 adaptation TEACHER INSTRUCTIONS TYPE OF ACTIVITY 1. With your class, brainstorm everything you know about fungi. Teacher read/comprehension 2. For younger students, hand out the question sheet before you begin the teacher read and have them follow along and MATERIALS answer the questions as you read. • copies of page 11 3. For older students, inform them that they will be given a • pencils brainteaser quiz (that is not for evaluation) after you finish reading the text. VOCABULARY 4. The class can work on the questions with partners or in groups bioremediation and then go over the answers as a class. Discuss any chitin particularly interesting facts and encourage further fungi independent research. habitat hyphae K-3 ADAPTATION kingdom 1. To introduce younger students to fungi, you can make a KWL lichens chart either as a class or individually. A KWL chart is divided moulds into three parts. The first tells what a student KNOWS (K) mushrooms about a subject before it is studied in class. The second part mycelium tells what the student WANTS (W) to know about that subject. mycorrhizas The third part tells what the child LEARNED (L) after studying nematodes that subject. parasitic fungi 2. Share some of the fascinating fungal facts presented in the photosynthesis “Fungi—The Hidden Kingdom” text with your students.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms & Bodies of Water
    Name Date Landforms & Bodies of Water - Vocab Cards hill noun a raised area of land smaller than a mountain. We rode our bikes up and down the grassy hill. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: island noun a piece of land surrounded by water on all sides. Marissa's family took a vacation on an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: 1 lake noun a large body of fresh or salt water that has land all around it. The lake freezes in the wintertime and we go ice skating on it. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: landform noun any of the earth's physical features, such as a hill or valley, that have been formed by natural forces of movement or erosion. I love canyons and plains, but glaciers are my favorite landform. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: 2 mountain noun a land mass with great height and steep sides. It is much higher than a hill. Someday I'm going to hike and climb that tall, steep mountain. Synonyms: peak Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: ocean noun a part of the large body of salt water that covers most of the earth's surface.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Continuum Redux: Aquatic Insect Diets Reveal the Importance of Autochthonous Resources in the Salmon River, Idaho
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 2011 The River Continuum Redux: Aquatic Insect Diets Reveal the Importance of Autochthonous Resources in the Salmon River, Idaho Kathryn Vallis Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Vallis, Kathryn, "The River Continuum Redux: Aquatic Insect Diets Reveal the Importance of Autochthonous Resources in the Salmon River, Idaho" (2011). Master's Theses. 561. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/561 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2011 Kathryn Vallis LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO THE RIVER CONTINUUM REDUX: AQUATIC INSECT DIETS REVEAL THE IMPORTANCE OF AUTOCHTHONOUS RESOURCES IN THE SALMON RIVER, IDAHO A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGY BY KATHRYN LYNDSEY VALLIS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2011 Copyright by Kathryn Lyndsey Vallis, 2011 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although the end result of a Master’s program is a degree celebrating an individual’s achievement, the journey to get to that point is certainly not traveled alone. I would first like to thank all of those that I had the privilege of working alongside in the Rosi-Marshall lab at Loyola and the Cary Institute, particularly Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • River Incision Into Bedrock: Mechanics and Relative Efficacy of Plucking, Abrasion and Cavitation
    River incision into bedrock: Mechanics and relative efficacy of plucking, abrasion and cavitation Kelin X. Whipple* Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Gregory S. Hancock Department of Geology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187 Robert S. Anderson Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064 ABSTRACT long term (Howard et al., 1994). These conditions are commonly met in Improved formulation of bedrock erosion laws requires knowledge mountainous and tectonically active landscapes, and bedrock channels are of the actual processes operative at the bed. We present qualitative field known to dominate steeplands drainage networks (e.g., Wohl, 1993; Mont- evidence from a wide range of settings that the relative efficacy of the gomery et al., 1996; Hovius et al., 1997). As the three-dimensional structure various processes of fluvial erosion (e.g., plucking, abrasion, cavitation, of drainage networks sets much of the form of terrestrial landscapes, it is solution) is a strong function of substrate lithology, and that joint spac- clear that a deep appreciation of mountainous landscapes requires knowl- ing, fractures, and bedding planes exert the most direct control. The edge of the controls on bedrock channel morphology. Moreover, bedrock relative importance of the various processes and the nature of the in- channels play a critical role in the dynamic evolution of mountainous land- terplay between them are inferred from detailed observations of the scapes (Anderson, 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Howard et al., 1994; Tucker morphology of erosional forms on channel bed and banks, and their and Slingerland, 1996; Sklar and Dietrich, 1998; Whipple and Tucker, spatial distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Responses of Zooplankton to Predation
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 43(3): 530-550, 1988 BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES OF ZOOPLANKTON TO PREDATION M. D. Ohman ABSTRACT Many behavioral traits of zooplankton reduce the probability of successful consumption by predators, Prey behavioral responses act at different points of a predation sequence, altering the probability of a predator's success at encounter, attack, capture or ingestion. Avoidance behavior (through spatial refuges, diel activity cycles, seasonal diapause, locomotory behavior) minimizes encounter rates with predators. Escape responses (through active motility, passive evasion, aggregation, bioluminescence) diminish rates of attack or successful capture. Defense responses (through chemical means, induced morphology) decrease the probability of suc- cessful ingestion by predators. Behavioral responses of individuals also alter the dynamics of populations. Future efforts to predict the growth of prey and predator populations will require greater attention to avoidance, escape and defense behavior. Prey activities such as occupation of spatial refuges, aggregation responses, or avoidance responses that vary ac- cording to the behavioral state of predators can alter the outcome of population interactions, introducing stability into prey-predator oscillations. In variable environments, variance in behavioral traits can "spread the risk" (den Boer, 1968) of local extinction. At present the extent of variability of prey and predator behavior, as well as the relative contributions of genotypic variance and of phenotypic plasticity,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Common and Scientific Names for Fish and Wildlife Species Found in Idaho
    APPENDIX A: COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIES FOUND IN IDAHO. How to Read the Lists. Within these lists, species are listed phylogenetically by class. In cases where phylogeny is incompletely understood, taxonomic units are arranged alphabetically. Listed below are definitions for interpreting NatureServe conservation status ranks (GRanks and SRanks). These ranks reflect an assessment of the condition of the species rangewide (GRank) and statewide (SRank). Rangewide ranks are assigned by NatureServe and statewide ranks are assigned by the Idaho Conservation Data Center. GX or SX Presumed extinct or extirpated: not located despite intensive searches and virtually no likelihood of rediscovery. GH or SH Possibly extinct or extirpated (historical): historically occurred, but may be rediscovered. Its presence may not have been verified in the past 20–40 years. A species could become SH without such a 20–40 year delay if the only known occurrences in the state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. The SH rank is reserved for species for which some effort has been made to relocate occurrences, rather than simply using this status for all elements not known from verified extant occurrences. G1 or S1 Critically imperiled: at high risk because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it particularly vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G2 or S2 Imperiled: at risk because of restricted range, few populations (often 20 or fewer), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G3 or S3 Vulnerable: at moderate risk because of restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation.
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development
    Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development River Characteristics - Sediment Transport - River Velocity - Terminology The illustrations below represent the 3 general classifications into which rivers are placed according to specific characteristics. These categories are: Youthful, Mature and Old Age. A Rejuvenated River, one with a gradient that is raised by the earth's movement, can be an old age river that returns to a Youthful State, and which repeats the cycle of stages once again. A brief overview of each stage of river development begins after the images. A list of pertinent vocabulary appears at the bottom of this document. You may wish to consult it so that you will be aware of terminology used in the descriptive text that follows. Characteristics found in the 3 Stages of River Development: L. Immoor 2006 Geoteach.com 1 Youthful River: Perhaps the most dynamic of all rivers is a Youthful River. Rafters seeking an exciting ride will surely gravitate towards a young river for their recreational thrills. Characteristically youthful rivers are found at higher elevations, in mountainous areas, where the slope of the land is steeper. Water that flows over such a landscape will flow very fast. Youthful rivers can be a tributary of a larger and older river, hundreds of miles away and, in fact, they may be close to the headwaters (the beginning) of that larger river. Upon observation of a Youthful River, here is what one might see: 1. The river flowing down a steep gradient (slope). 2. The channel is deeper than it is wide and V-shaped due to downcutting rather than lateral (side-to-side) erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS and RUNNING WATER Hydrologic Cycle •What Happens to Precipitation STREAM •River, Creek, Etc
    STREAMS AND RUNNING WATER Hydrologic Cycle •What happens to precipitation STREAM •River, Creek, etc. • Banks, Bed • Confined to a channel –Except in time of flood •Floodplain •Longtitudinal Profile Headwaters, mouth Cross-profile V-shaped SHEETWASH –Unchanneled, thin sheet of flowing water – Results in Sheet Erosion Drainage Basin •Tributary • Divide • Examples: –Mississippi River – Amazon River Drainage Patterns •As seen from above • Dendritic (most common) • Radial • Trellis- in tilted or folded layered rock Factors affecting stream erosion and deposition •Velocity- –Distribution in cross-section •Gradient –Usually decreases downstream – Effect on deposition and erosion •Channel shape and roughness • Discharge- –Volume of water moving past a place in time •Usually given as cubic feet per second (cfs) –Usually increases downstream •Discharge- –Volume of water moving past a place in time •Usually given as cubic feet per second (cfs) –Usually increases downstream American River Discharge •In Sacramento: • Average 3,741 c.f.s. • Usual Range: –Winter 9,000 cfs – Last drought 250 cfs •1986 flood 130,000 cfs Stream Erosion •Hydraulic action • Solution- Dissolves rock • Abrasion (by sand and gravel) –Potholes •Deepens valley by eroding river bed • Lateral erosion of banks on outside of curves Transportation of Sediment •Bed load • Suspended load • Dissolved load Deposition •Bars- –moved in floods – deposited as water slows – Placer Deposits (gold, etc.) – Braided Streams •heavy load of sand and gravel • commonly from glacier outwash streams
    [Show full text]