Journal of Agromedicine, 15:71-75,2010 Q Taylor & Francis Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ~ Taylor&FrandsGroup ISSN: 1059-924X print/1545-0813 online DOl: 10.1080/1 0599241003630585 The Agrarian Imperative ABSTRA CT. The most recent National Occupational Research Agenda includes, as a goal, conducting research that enhances the understanding of psychological factors that affect the well-being of people engaged in farming. The author proposes a construct, the agrarian imperative, as an explanation for why people engage in agriculture. Several lines of evidence are offered as validation of the agrarian imperative. Historical evidence suggests that domesticating animals and cultivating land to produce food, fiber, and shelter allowed humans to proliferate. In other words, agriculture yielded survival advantages for the human species. Genetic and anthropological evidence is accruing that suggests that acquiring territories of land to produce these necessities has an inherited basis that is encoded into our genetic material. Feedback from the environment influences and modifies the genetic memory pertaining to the agrarian imperative. Psychological evidence, particularly personality research, suggests behavioral traits that are characteristic of persons who are engaged in agriculture. Inability to farm successfully, however, is also associated with an increased probability of suicide. The agrarian imperative could be an important avenue of behavioral research that elucidates motives and risk-taking of people engaged in agriculture. To farmers, land means everything. Own- by the death of a child. In both circumstances ership of a family fann is the triumphant the future operation of the family farm is being result of the struggles of multiple genera- called into jeopardy. The termination of a family tions. Losing the family fann is the ultimate farm is not simply the loss of a job, but also the loss-bringing shame to the generation that end of a way of life handed down and cultivated has let down their forebearers and dashing for generations. 25 the hopes for successors . What drives family farmers to cling so tena- ciously to the land? The best explanation is that The Farm Crisis of the 1980s taught us that agricultural people are motivated by a basic the threatened loss of the farm operation is one human instinct called the agrarian imperative. of the most stressful events that affects farm Like many animal species, humans have a basic families, more stressful than divorce or the drive to acquire sufficient territory to produce death of a parent and exceeded, perhaps, only the food and shelter required by their families Michael R. Rosmanll is Executive Director, AgriWellness, Inc., Harlan, Iowa, USA. Address correspondence to: Michael R. Rosmann, PhD, Executive Director, AgriWellness, Inc., 1210 7th Street, Suite C, Harlan, IA 51537, USA (E-mail: [email protected]). and communities. Sometimes called the agrarian women, some children, and maybe a surviving personality, this genetically programmed instinct elder. People seldom lived beyond 40 years of impels farmers to hang onto their land at all age. Early Homo erectus people were scavengers costs. The agrarian imperative instills farmers who lived off plants and their seeds, tubers, to work incredibly hard, to endure unusual pain insects, and whatever other sources of protein and hardship, and to take uncommon risks. they could capture-such as small animals and Iprefer the term agrarian imperative over the fish, or find-such as the carcasses of animals term agrarian personality. Personality implies a slain by more powerful predators. The kinship set of behaviors whereas imperative implies an groups found they could hunt larger prey and urge that motivates actions. Not just a style of gain advantage in protecting themsel ves if they behavior, the agrarian imperative is a purpose- banded together into larger groups. But still, ful drive. Although it is appropriate to consider when children grew into adolescents often they that the agrarian imperative is an hypothesized were rejected from the clan or captured by rival construct, there are several lines of evidence that clans as sexual partners to build new kinship offer validation. groups. They established territories, which they marked with rock cairns or which they signaled with shouts and banging sticks and rocks together. The most powerful clans occupied the most desirable territories with the greatest Formulation of the concept of agrarian opportunities to obtain food and shelter. imperative can be traced back to Konrad Gradually the human kinship clans outgrew LorenzI and Niko Tinbergen.2 They and their the carrying capacity of the territories they colleague, Karl von Frisch, were awarded the inhabited. Many had no choice but to seek out Nobel Prize in 1973 for their astute observations new terrain. Life remained uncertain, as the of animals' and other species' behavior in their plants and animals on which they subsisted varied natural environments. They observed that most in their availability. Some hunter-gatherers found animals established territories with sufficient that seeds that they had collected and inadvert- resources to enable the maintenance and ently dropped around their living sites sprang up reproduction of additional members of the into new growth. This was the beginning of same species. farming. Learning how to tuck seeds into moist Animals mark the boundaries of their territo- ground and to hoe away competing plants had ries in various ways. Cats spray urine on promi- survival value. Storing the food produced on nent tree trunks, rocks, or plants. Coyotes howl at their plots for lean times such as winter gave dusk and dawn and leave their scat in obvious agrarian clans a powerful advantage over the locations for other canines to detect. Birds fly hunter-gatherer troops. from tree to tree, singing loudly to proclaim, In the history of modern man, agriculture is "This piece of territory belongs to me." Many relatively new-only a few thousand years.3 fish parents guard their nests and attack any Territorial urges facilitated the development of intruder until the young are hatched and have agricultural techniques such as herding goats found refuge in tangles of plants, coral, or and tilling plots of land to raise grain.3 rocks. Personal objects that signify ownership are Although the vast majority of people in the the human pheromones. We mark the boundaries world currently are not involved in agriculture, of our territories with fences, sidewalks, signs, the agrarian imperative is manifested in other and legal descriptions. Most people even deco- fashions, such as the practice of maintaining rate our office cubicles-if we work in such lawns around our houses, branding business confining spaces-with photographs of loved products with logos, and the adoption of a ones and carefully selected decorations that particular style of jersey by a sporting team. signify that "this space is mine." These cultural practices stem from urges to stake The earliest humans lived as families or kin- out tenitories to raise crops and livestock that ship groups consisting of a man and one or two became encoded into our ancestors' genetic memory, much like hunter-gatherers' urges to around in our DNA the genetic codes that influ- defend their hunting, fishing, and scavenging enced our Australopithecus afarensis and territories. Ardipithecus ramidus ancestors.8 Just as these As early humans outgrew their African ter- genetic codes helped Lucy, the australopithe- ritories, they pushed into Asia and Europe and cine whose skeleton was found by Donald eventually went across the land bridge to the Johanson,9 adapt to her wild environment, these western hemisphere and crossed the ocean to and later genetic acquisitions became part of Australia. The agrarian imperative fostered the our genetic memory that defines our agrarian establishment of governments and courts to roots. Our agrarian roots most fully express settle territorial disputes.4 The agrarian impera- themselves when we live and work on the land. tive acquired incredible survival value for the How quickly our bodies harden and toughen human species that enabled humans to propa- when we leave an urban lifestyle and become gate prolifically. immersed in nature, working the land for a liv- ing. Our fingers thicken and our hands enlarge; our behavior becomes practical and our man- GENETIC AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL ners become brusque, geared toward accom- EVIDENCE plishing tasks with a minimum of energy and physical wear and tear. We develop an intense How is the agrarian imperative inherited? attachment to the land we work. We take great We know that if the DNA of the human genome pride in our crops and livestock. Bonds of were laid end-to-end, the genetic material mutual dependency develop between humans would stretch approximately 66.6 inches.s The and farm animals. Farmers are aware that we Nobel Prize-winning scientists James Watson are producing essentials for life: food, fiber, and Francis Crick were the first to calculate the and renewable energy. In short, we exhibit the length and spacings in the structures of deoxyri- agrarian imperative as a way of life. bonucleic acid, which they reported in the April In his book The Territorial Imperative, Robert 25, 1953, issue of Nature. Barely upstaging ArdreylO contends that the earliest humans were Linus Pauling, Watson and Crick described shaped by their environment in Africa to how the human genome worked.6 Molecular develop agrarian traits, including the striving geneticists later were able to show that less than for territories. He and the anthropologists Louis an inch of the DNA is responsible for most and Mary Leakey carried on interesting discus- observable bodily and behavioral characteristics. sions about what structures of the human body What good is there then in the other 66 to look for in the earliest forms of modern man. inches of genetic material? Genetic epidemiolo- Walking upright required modifications in the gists are tracking down the location of human pelvic attachment of the hip bones and changed traits and diseases in the complex human the hands so they could be used better to grasp genetic structure.