DOCSLIB.ORG

Funding and Operation of the Commonwealth State/Territory Disability Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Funding and Operation of the Commonwealth State/Territory Disability Agreement The Senate Standing Committee on Community Affairs Funding and operation of the Commonwealth State/Territory Disability Agreement February 2007 © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 ISBN 978-0-642-71756-6 Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat: Mr Elton Humphery (Secretary) Ms Christine McDonald (Principal Research Officer) Mr Owen Griffiths (Senior Research Officer) Ms Leonie Peake (Research Officer) Ms Ingrid Zappe (Executive Assistant) The Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3515 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_ca This document was produced by the Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. iii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE From 11 September 2006 1 Members Senator Gary Humphries, Chair LP, Australian Capital Territory Senator Claire Moore, Deputy Chair ALP, Queensland Senator Judith Adams LP, Western Australia Senator Lyn Allison AD, Victoria Senator Carol Brown ALP, Tasmania Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells LP, New South Wales Senator the Hon Kay Patterson LP, Victoria Senator Helen Polley ALP, Tasmania Substitute Member Senator Siewert, AG Western Australia to replace Senator Allison for the inquiry and Senator Ferris, LP South Australia to replace Senator Adams on 6 October 2006 Participating Members for the inquiry Senator Guy Barnett LP, Tasmania Senator Andrew Bartlett AD, Queensland Senator Jan McLucas ALP, Queensland Senator Gavin Marshall ALP, Victoria Senator Ruth Webber ALP, Western Australia 1 The Senate Committee system was restructured on 11 September 2006 to amalgamate the former legislation and references committees. The membership of committees was varied as part of the restructure. Inquiries that were current on 11 September continued with the same terms of reference and reporting dates. iv Senate Community Affairs References Committee Until 10 September 2006 Members Senator Claire Moore, Chair ALP, Queensland Senator Gary Humphries, Deputy Chair LP, Australian Capital Territory Senator Judith Adams LP, Western Australia Senator Lyn Allison AD, Victoria Senator Carol Brown ALP, Tasmania Senator Helen Polley ALP, Tasmania Substitute Member Senator Siewert, AG Western Australia to replace Senator Allison for the inquiry Participating Members for the inquiry Senator Guy Barnett LP, Tasmania Senator Andrew Bartlett AD, Queensland Senator Jan McLucas ALP, Queensland Senator Gavin Marshall ALP, Victoria Senator Ruth Webber ALP, Western Australia v TABLE OF CONTENTS MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE ..................................................................... iii RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 Terms of reference..................................................................................................1 Conduct of the inquiry............................................................................................1 Background.............................................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2 THE AGREEMENTS – INTENT AND EFFECT ....................................................................3 Background.............................................................................................................3 Commonwealth State Disability Agreement (1991-1992 to 1996-1997) ..............5 Major features......................................................................................................6 Funding................................................................................................................6 The views of consumers and service providers...................................................7 Impact of the first CSDA.....................................................................................7 Commonwealth State Disability Agreement (1997-1998 to 2001-2002) ............11 Funding..............................................................................................................11 Impact of the second CSDA..............................................................................12 Commonwealth State Territory Disability Agreement (2002-2003 to 2006-2007)....................................................................................13 Conclusion............................................................................................................21 CHAPTER 3 APPROPRIATENESS OF JOINT FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS......................................23 Introduction ..........................................................................................................23 Bilateral Agreements.........................................................................................24 Joint funding arrangements ..................................................................................26 Responsibilities..................................................................................................26 Inflexible interfaces...........................................................................................28 Commonwealth services - State/Territory services interface - transitions........28 State/Territory services interface – portability..................................................29 Dual diagnosis and multiple disability ..............................................................30 Complexity and overlap ....................................................................................32 Cost-shifting ......................................................................................................32 Whole of government coordination...................................................................34 A national approach?............................................................................................35 Competitive federalism .....................................................................................36 A federal dilemma .............................................................................................37 Conclusion............................................................................................................38 Assessment ...........................................................................................................41 vi Assessment and planning ..................................................................................41 Application procedures......................................................................................41 A National Framework......................................................................................43 A Disability Assessment Team?........................................................................44 The burden of multiple assessments..................................................................45 Appropriate Assessment....................................................................................46 Indexation of CSTDA funding .............................................................................46 Demand funding ...................................................................................................50 Growth Funding....................................................................................................52 Equity of funding distribution ..............................................................................53 Possible solutions ..............................................................................................55 Performance monitoring and reporting ................................................................56 Input controls.....................................................................................................58 The burden of accountability.............................................................................59 Outcomes and quality based performance framework......................................59 CHAPTER 4 UNMET NEED........................................................................................................................63 Disability support services ...................................................................................64 Assessments of unmet need..................................................................................65 Disability services data.........................................................................................67 CSDA Minimum Data Set.................................................................................68 CSTDA National Minimum Data Set ...............................................................68 Improvements in datasets ..................................................................................69 Conclusion.........................................................................................................73 Continuing unmet need.........................................................................................73 Accommodation support services .....................................................................74 Identification of unmet need for accommodation services............................75 Options for accommodation services.............................................................81 Respite services .................................................................................................82 Assistive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation in Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015)
    Let Her Finish: Gender, Sexism, and Deliberative Participation In Australian Senate Estimates Hearings (2006-2015) Joanna Richards School of Government and Policy Faculty of Business, Government and Law University of Canberra ABSTRACT In 2016, Australia ranks 54th in the world for representation of women in Parliament, with women ​ accounting for only 29% of the House of Representatives, and 39% of the Senate. This inevitably ​ inspires discussion about women in parliament, quotas, and leadership styles. Given the wealth of research which suggests that equal representation does not necessarily guarantee equal treatment, this study focuses on Authoritative representation. That is, the space in between winning a seat and making a difference where components of communication and interaction affect the authority of a speaker.This study combines a Discourse Analysis of the official Hansard transcripts from the Senate Estimates Committee hearings, selected over a 10 year period between 2006 and 2015, with a linguistic ethnography of the Australian Senate to complement results with context. Results show that although female senators and witnesses are certainly in the room, they do not have the same capacity as their male counterparts. Both the access and effectiveness of women in the Senate is limited; not only are they given proportionally less time to speak, but interruption, gate keeping tactics, and the designation of questions significantly different in nature to those directed at men all work to limit female participation in the political domain. As witnesses, empirical measures showed that female testimony was often undermined by senators. Results also showed that female senators and witnesses occasionally adopted masculine styles of communication in an attempt to increase effectiveness in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    8142 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 4 June 2008 __________ The Speaker (The Hon. George Richard Torbay) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The Speaker read the Prayer and acknowledgement of country. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Notices of Motions General Business Notices of Motions (General Notices) given. MISCELLANEOUS ACTS AMENDMENT (SAME SEX RELATIONSHIPS) BILL 2008 Bill received from the Legislative Council and introduced. Agreement in principle set down as an order of the day for a later hour. AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB BILL 2008 Agreement in Principle Debate resumed from 14 May 2008. Mr GEORGE SOURIS (Upper Hunter) [10.04 a.m.]: I have pleasure in leading for the Opposition in the debate on the Australian Jockey Club Bill 2008. I say at the outset that the Opposition will not oppose the bill—in fact, we will take some pleasure in seeing it ultimately change the face of the Australian Jockey Club. The purpose of the bill is to recognise the incorporation of the Australian Jockey Club and to transfer its assets, rights and liabilities to the newly incorporated Australian Jockey Club Limited. The bill will also enable the trustees of Randwick racecourse to grant a lease of the racecourse lands for up to 99 years. The Australian Jockey Club is currently an unincorporated association. In light of recent financial concerns, the chairman and board members, focusing on their potential personal liability and in line with modern business practice, initiated the process to update the current Australian Jockey Club Act, which dates back to 1873. The trustees of Randwick racecourse are limited to granting a 50-year lease under the current Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements in Family Law Proceedings
    Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System Improvements in family law proceedings Second interim report March 2021 © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN 978-1-76093-183-4 (Printed Version) ISBN 978-1-76093-183-4 (HTML Version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Members Chair Hon Kevin Andrews MP Menzies, VIC Deputy Chair Senator Pauline Hanson PHON, QLD Members Dr Anne Aly MP Cowan, WA Senator Claire Chandler LP, TAS Dr Fiona Martin MP Reid, NSW Senator Matt O'Sullivan LP, WA Mr Graham Perrett MP Moreton, QLD Senator Helen Polley ALP, TAS Ms Zali Steggall OAM MP Warringah, NSW Mr Terry Young MP (from 7.09.2020)1 Longman, QLD Participating Member Senator Larissa Waters AG, QLD Senator Malcolm Roberts PHON, QLD Former Members Senator Tim Ayres (19.09.2019–15.10.2019) ALP, NSW Mr Llewellyn (Llew) O’Brien MP (until 24.02.2020) Wide Bay, QLD Department of the Senate Ph: 02 6277 3439 PO Box 6100 Fax: 02 6277 5809 Parliament House E-mail: [email protected] Canberra ACT 2600 Internet: www.aph.gov.au/select_familylaw 1 House of Representatives; Votes and Proceedings, No. 71 Tuesday, 6 October 2020, p. 1224. See also, House of Representatives, Proof Hansard, 6 October 2020, p. 4. The House of Representatives appointed Mr Young on 6 October 2020 with his appointment being effective from 7 September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • LABOR NEWSNEWS Octoberoctober 2008 2012 PREMIER’S MESSAGE an Abbott Federal Government Would Be a Disaster for Tasmania
    LABORLABOR NEWSNEWS OctoberOctober 2008 2012 PREMIER’S MESSAGE An Abbott Federal Government would be a disaster for Tasmania. It’s difficult to overstate the damage that the federal Opposition leader’s policies would do to the Tasmanian economy and government services if he is ever elected Prime Minister. The single biggest threat is the Liberal Party’s stance on the distribution of GST revenue. Mainland Liberal Premiers are united in pushing for a per capita distribution of GST revenue, which would strip up to $700 million per annum from Tasmania’s budget. That’s the equivalent of $5000 for every Tasmanian household. Mr Abbott has consistently expressed sympathy and support for his Liberal colleague’s campaign. His claims that such an approach would not disadvantage Tasmania are laughable. Liberal Premiers are pursuing a change in the way GST revenue is distributed because they PREMIER LARA GIDDINGS want to get their hands on more of it. With a finite amount of cash available, giving more to WA, Victoria, Queensland and NSW must mean there’s less available for the smaller States. The impact on public services in Tasmania of a further massive reduction in GST revenue would be devastating. But the potential damage to Tasmania of an Abbott government does not end there. Mr Abbott’s pledge to repeal the price on carbon would strip a further $70 million per annum from Tasmania, as we benefit financially from our strong advantage in renewable energy. He has also pledged to abandon the NBN, which would cost Tasmania 800 jobs in the roll-out phase and jeopardise our place in the new digital economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon Bill Shorten Mp Shadow Ministry
    THE HON BILL SHORTEN MP Leader of the Opposition Member for Maribyrnong SHADOW MINISTRY TITLE SHADOW MINISTER Leader of the Opposition Hon Bill Shorten MP Shadow Minister Assisting the Leader for Science Senator the Hon Kim Carr Shadow Minister Assisting the Leader for Small Business Hon Bernie Ripoll MP Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Small Business Julie Owens MP Shadow Cabinet Secretary Senator the Hon Jacinta Collins Shadow Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition Shadow Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition Hon Michael Danby MP Shadow Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition Dr Jim Chalmers MP Deputy Leader of the Opposition Hon Tanya Plibersek MP Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Development Shadow Minister for Women Senator Claire Moore Manager of Opposition Business (Senate) Shadow Minister for the Centenary of ANZAC Senator the Hon Don Farrell Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Foreign Affairs Hon Matt Thistlethwaite MP Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator the Hon Penny Wong Shadow Minister for Trade and Investment Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Trade and Investment Dr Jim Chalmers MP Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator the Hon Stephen Conroy Shadow Minister for Defence Shadow Assistant Minister for Defence Hon David Feeney MP Shadow Minister for Veterans’ Affairs Senator the Hon Don Farrell Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Gai Brodtmann MP Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Transport Hon Anthony Albanese MP Shadow
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
    The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills Scrutiny Digest 8 of 2018 15 August 2018 © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 ISSN 2207-2004 (print) ISSN 2207-2012 (online) This document was prepared by the Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. ii Membership of the Committee Current members Senator Helen Polley (Chair) ALP, Tasmania Senator John Williams (Deputy Chair) NATS, New South Wales Senator Jonathon Duniam LP, Tasmania Senator Jane Hume LP, Victoria Senator Janet Rice AG, Victoria Senator Murray Watt ALP, Queensland Secretariat Ms Anita Coles, Secretary Mr Michael Sloane, Principal Research Officer Mr Andrew McIntyre, Senior Research Officer Ms Ingrid Zappe, Legislative Research Officer Committee legal adviser Associate Professor Leighton McDonald Committee contacts PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3050 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_scrutiny iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of the committee ............................................................................... iii Introduction ............................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1 – Initial scrutiny Commentary on bills Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2018 ........................................ 1 Defence Amendment (Call Out of the Australian Defence Force) Bill 2018 ........... 3 Family Law Amendment (Family
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf (572.33Kb)
    Dear Mr McCusker, Please find attached Enhancing Democracy in Western Australia, my submission to the review of the Western Australian Legislative Council electoral system. I am happy for it to be made public. Yours sincerely, Chris Curtis Enhancing Democracy in Western Australia Chris Curtis May 2021 The manufactured hysteria that greeted Ricky Muir’s election to the Senate and that ultimately led to the Turnbull government’s rigging the Senate voting system to favour the Greens over the micro-parties is getting an encore performance with the election of Wilson Tucker in Western Australia, despite the unremarked-upon election in both jurisdictions of many more candidates of major parties from even lower primary votes and with the added twist that most members of the panel established to investigate the matter have already endorsed, even promoted, the hysteria (https://insidestory.org.au/an-affront-to-anyone-who- believes-in-democracy/). While it is clear from this fact that submissions in support of logic and democracy have already been ruled out of consideration, it is worthwhile putting them on the public record for future historians to refer to and so that more reasonable politicians can revisit the issue if the hysteria dies down. Enhancing Democracy in Western Australia 2 Contents Purpose - - - - - - - - - - 3 Summary - - - - - - - - - - 3 1. Principles - - - - - - - - - - 5 2. The Single Transferable Vote - - - - - - - 6 3. The Irrational Complaints - - - - - - - 11 4. Party Preferences - - - - - - - - - 15 5. Imposing a Party List System - - - - - - - 17 6. The Value of Group Voting Tickets - - - - - - 18 7. The Real Issue and the Solution - - - - - - - 20 8. Personal How-to-Vote Website - - - - - - - 22 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on All Aspects of the Conduct of the 2019 Federal Election and Matters Related Thereto
    PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Interim report on all aspects of the conduct of the 2019 Federal Election and matters related thereto Delegation to the International Grand Committee, Dublin, Ireland Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters February 2020 CANBERRA © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN 978-1-76092-072-2 (Printed version) ISBN 978-1-76092-073-9 (HTML version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Contents THE REPORT Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................... v Membership of the Committee .................................................................................................................... vi Terms of reference .......................................................................................................................................... x List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... xi List of recommendations ............................................................................................................................. xii 1 Delegation report .............................................................................................. 1 Background to
    [Show full text]
  • House of Assembly Wednesday 2 May 2018
    Wednesday 2 May 2018 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People, and read Prayers. QUESTIONS Royal Hobart Hospital - Emergency Department Issues Ms WHITE question to PREMIER, Mr HODGMAN [10.02 a.m.] Did you know that yesterday there were 63 patients stuck in the emergency department at the Royal Hobart Hospital, patients were being treated in three corridors, and there were 10 ambulances ramped? This is bad for patients and bad for stressed staff. If anything, it looks like this winter will be worse than last winter. Why was the hospital not escalated to level 4, as staff were asking for? Was there political pressure not to escalate due to the parliament resuming? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for the question but would cast a very healthy level of scepticism over any suggestions from her as to what this Government might do other than ensure we get on with the job of delivering on our record level of investment and commitments that will go to delivering the health service, which is improving under our Government and that we promised in the election. That is what we are focusing on. We recognise that there are pressures on the health system. That is why, with our budget back in balance, we have been able to commit a record amount over the last four years, $7 billion in the last budget and $750 million, to boost our efforts to improve the health system Tasmanians need. We will need to not only build the health system and the infrastructure to support it - Members interjecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Portraits
    46th Parliament: Senators Senator the Hon Senator Senator Senator Senator Eric Abetz Alex Antic Wendy Askew Tim Ayres Catryna Bilyk Senator for Tasmania Senator for Senator for Tasmania Senator for Senator for Tasmania South Australia New South Wales Senator the Hon Senator Senator Senator Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham Andrew Bragg Slade Brockman Carol Brown Matthew Canavan Senator for Senator for Senator for Senator for Tasmania Senator for Queensland South Australia New South Wales Western Australia Senator the Hon Senator the Hon Senator Senator Senator Kim Carr Michaelia Cash Claire Chandler Anthony Chisholm Raff Ciccone Senator for Victoria Senator for Senator for Tasmania Senator for Queensland Senator for Victoria Western Australia Senator the Hon Senator Senator Senator Senator the Hon Richard Colbeck Perin Davey Patrick Dodson Jonathon Duniam Don Farrell Senator for Tasmania Senator for Senator for Senator for Tasmania Senator for New South Wales Western Australia South Australia 1 Last updated 4 May 2021 46th Parliament: Senators Senator Senator the Hon Senator the Senator Senator Mehreen Faruqi David Fawcett Hon Concetta Alex Gallacher Katy Gallagher Fierravanti-Wells Senator for Senator for Senator for Senator for Australian New South Wales South Australia Senator for South Australia Capital Territory New South Wales Senator Senator Senator Senator Sarah Senator the Hon Nita Green Stirling Griff Pauline Hanson Hanson-Young Sarah Henderson Senator for Queensland Senator for Senator for Queensland Senator for Senator for
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Lobbying Code of Conduct
    The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration Knock, knock… who's there? The Lobbying Code of Conduct September 2008 © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 ISBN 978–0–642–71975–1 Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Membership of the Committee Members to 30 June 2008 Senator Helen Polley (Chair) ALP, TAS Senator Mitch Fifield (Deputy Chair) LP, VIC Senator Carol Brown ALP, TAS Senator Jacinta Collins ALP, VIC Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells LP, NSW Senator Claire Moore ALP, QLD Senator Andrew Murray AD, WA Senator John Watson LP, TAS Members from 1 July 2008 Senator Helen Polley (Chair) ALP, TAS Senator Mitch Fifield (Deputy Chair) LP, VIC Senator Doug Cameron ALP, NSW Senator Jacinta Collins ALP, VIC Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells LP, NSW Senator Claire Moore ALP, QLD Senator Scott Ryan LP, VIC Participating Members Senators Abetz, Adams, Arbib, Barnett, Bernardi, Birmigham, Bishop, Bilyk, Boswell, Boyce, Brandis, Bob Brown, Carol Brown, Bushby, Cash, Colbeck, Coonan, Cormann, Crosin, Eggleston, Ellison, Farrell, Feeny, Fielding, Fisher, Forshaw, Furner, Hanson-Young, Heffernan, Hogg, Humphries, Hurley, Hutchins, Johnston, Joyce, Lulam, Lundy, Ian Macdonald, Marshall, Mason, McGauran, McLucas, Milne, Minchin, Nash, O'Brien, Parry, Payne, Ronaldson, Pratt, Scullion, Siewert, Stephens, Sterle. Troeth, Williams, Wortley and Xenophon Secretariat Stephen Palethorpe Committee Secretary Tim Watling Principal Research Officer Michael Masters Research Officer Katie Meyers Executive Assistant Margaret
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Difference for the Young People of Tasmania
    making a difference for the young people of Tasmania annual report 2013-14 the peak body for the youth sector in Tasmania vision contents a Tasmania where young people are actively engaged Chair’s Report 4 Youth Ethics Framework for Tasmania 18 in community life and have YNOT Members 6 YNOT AGM and Sector Forum 19 access to the resources needed Supporters and Sponsors 7 to develop their potential. TYF Policy and Project Officer’s Report 20 Board Members 8 All About TYF 21 CEO’s Report 9 mission Volunteers 10 TYF Members and Volunteers 21 Working with TYF 22 to work with young people, Statewide Youth Collaborative (SYC) Group 11 the Tasmanian Youth Sector, TYF ‘Should I Stay or Should I Go?’ Statewide Forum 23 the community and all levels Youth Action Priorities (YAP) 12 of government to increase the Northern Youth Coordinating TYF ‘Y Your Vote participation and contribution Committee (NYCC) 12 Counts’ Statewide Forum 24 of young people in the state. North West Action for Youth (NWAY) 13 National Youth Week in Tasmania 25 Collaborations, Policy, Advocacy Youth Homelessness and Communications 14 Matters Day 2014 26 YNOT Youth Affairs Policy Platform 18 Other Opportunities with TYF 27 Chair’s Report The Greek philosopher Heraclitus is credited with the quote “change is the only constant in life”. It is a particularly apt quote to describe the last twelve months in Tasmania. In September last year we swore in a Federal Coalition Government after seven years in opposition along with a contingent of Palmer United Party members. In March we saw an end to the Labor-Green accord as Tasmanians voted in a majority Liberal Government for the first time since 1998.
    [Show full text]