DOCSLIB.ORG

The Solitary Wave That Killed the Schottky Problem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Solitary Wave That Killed the Schottky Problem The solitary wave that killed the Schottky problem Alberto Tacchella PhD seminars - April 27, 2016 Waves are everywhere... Surface waves at Ipanema, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Waves are everywhere... Chladni plate (Harvard Natural Sciences Lecture Demonstrations) Waves are everywhere... Pipe organ at Notre Dame Cathedral, Paris Waves are everywhere... Plasma waves in the sun (Solar Dynamics Observatory, NASA) Waves are everywhere... European Gravitational Observatory near Pisa, Italy Examples of linear waves: electromagnetic (unless you are dealing with weird materials) acoustic (usually) However, many other oscillatory phenomena (e.g. in fluids) are inherently nonlinear. Linear waves Wave equation: @2 − c2r2 u = 0 @t2 First derived (and solved) by d'Alembert (1747) in 1d case. General solution: u(x; t) = f (x − ct) + g(x + ct) with f ; g determined by initial data and/or boundary conditions. Linear waves Wave equation: @2 − c2r2 u = 0 @t2 First derived (and solved) by d'Alembert (1747) in 1d case. General solution: u(x; t) = f (x − ct) + g(x + ct) with f ; g determined by initial data and/or boundary conditions. Examples of linear waves: electromagnetic (unless you are dealing with weird materials) acoustic (usually) However, many other oscillatory phenomena (e.g. in fluids) are inherently nonlinear. Highly nonlinear; existence and uniqueness of solutions with prescribed regularity is an open problem (worth $1M!) Simplifications in the physics of the problem: inviscid flow (T = 0); uncompressible flow (r~ · ~v = 0); irrotational flow (r~ × ~v = 0); useful because we can rewrite our equations in terms of a potential ' such that ~v = r~ '. Nonlinear waves Navier-Stokes equations for the velocity field ~v: @~v ρ + (~v · r~ )~v = −r~ p + r~ · T + f~ @t + equation of state for the pressure + boundary conditions ρ density, p pressure (unknown), T \deviatoric stress tensor" (depends on ~v), f~ \body forces" acting on the fluid (gravity) Simplifications in the physics of the problem: inviscid flow (T = 0); uncompressible flow (r~ · ~v = 0); irrotational flow (r~ × ~v = 0); useful because we can rewrite our equations in terms of a potential ' such that ~v = r~ '. Nonlinear waves Navier-Stokes equations for the velocity field ~v: @~v ρ + (~v · r~ )~v = −r~ p + r~ · T + f~ @t + equation of state for the pressure + boundary conditions ρ density, p pressure (unknown), T \deviatoric stress tensor" (depends on ~v), f~ \body forces" acting on the fluid (gravity) Highly nonlinear; existence and uniqueness of solutions with prescribed regularity is an open problem (worth $1M!) Nonlinear waves Navier-Stokes equations for the velocity field ~v: @~v ρ + (~v · r~ )~v = −r~ p + r~ · T + f~ @t + equation of state for the pressure + boundary conditions ρ density, p pressure (unknown), T \deviatoric stress tensor" (depends on ~v), f~ \body forces" acting on the fluid (gravity) Highly nonlinear; existence and uniqueness of solutions with prescribed regularity is an open problem (worth $1M!) Simplifications in the physics of the problem: inviscid flow (T = 0); uncompressible flow (r~ · ~v = 0); irrotational flow (r~ × ~v = 0); useful because we can rewrite our equations in terms of a potential ' such that ~v = r~ '. Making all these assumptions we are left with r2' = 0 (continuity equation for flow in the bulk) with boundary conditions: 8 @' 1 2 > @t + 2 (r') + gη = 0 on z = η + h < @' @z = 0 on z = 0 :> @η @' @η @' @η @' @t + @x @x + @y @y − @z = 0 on z = η + h Nonlinear waves Simplifications in the geometry of the problem: z surface at h η(x; y; t)+h with boundary conditions: 8 @' 1 2 > @t + 2 (r') + gη = 0 on z = η + h < @' @z = 0 on z = 0 :> @η @' @η @' @η @' @t + @x @x + @y @y − @z = 0 on z = η + h Nonlinear waves Simplifications in the geometry of the problem: z surface at h η(x; y; t)+h Making all these assumptions we are left with r2' = 0 (continuity equation for flow in the bulk) Nonlinear waves Simplifications in the geometry of the problem: z surface at h η(x; y; t)+h Making all these assumptions we are left with r2' = 0 (continuity equation for flow in the bulk) with boundary conditions: 8 @' 1 2 > @t + 2 (r') + gη = 0 on z = η + h < @' @z = 0 on z = 0 :> @η @' @η @' @η @' @t + @x @x + @y @y − @z = 0 on z = η + h First fallback: suppress dimensions! @' @η = 0 = 0 @y @y Second fallback: linearize! η(x; t) = a cos(k0x − !0t) a h This ansatz satisfies our system when 2 !0 = gk0 tanh(k0h) dispersion relation ) phase velocity c2 = g tanh(k h). k0 0 In the shallow water limit k0h ! 0, 2 2 !0 = ghk0 p No dispersion, waves with speed c = gh Nonlinear waves, linearized This system is still very difficult to solve, mainly because the boundary conditions involve the unknown function η. Second fallback: linearize! η(x; t) = a cos(k0x − !0t) a h This ansatz satisfies our system when 2 !0 = gk0 tanh(k0h) dispersion relation ) phase velocity c2 = g tanh(k h). k0 0 In the shallow water limit k0h ! 0, 2 2 !0 = ghk0 p No dispersion, waves with speed c = gh Nonlinear waves, linearized This system is still very difficult to solve, mainly because the boundary conditions involve the unknown function η. First fallback: suppress dimensions! @' @η = 0 = 0 @y @y This ansatz satisfies our system when 2 !0 = gk0 tanh(k0h) dispersion relation ) phase velocity c2 = g tanh(k h). k0 0 In the shallow water limit k0h ! 0, 2 2 !0 = ghk0 p No dispersion, waves with speed c = gh Nonlinear waves, linearized This system is still very difficult to solve, mainly because the boundary conditions involve the unknown function η. First fallback: suppress dimensions! @' @η = 0 = 0 @y @y Second fallback: linearize! η(x; t) = a cos(k0x − !0t) a h In the shallow water limit k0h ! 0, 2 2 !0 = ghk0 p No dispersion, waves with speed c = gh Nonlinear waves, linearized This system is still very difficult to solve, mainly because the boundary conditions involve the unknown function η. First fallback: suppress dimensions! @' @η = 0 = 0 @y @y Second fallback: linearize! η(x; t) = a cos(k0x − !0t) a h This ansatz satisfies our system when 2 !0 = gk0 tanh(k0h) dispersion relation ) phase velocity c2 = g tanh(k h). k0 0 Nonlinear waves, linearized This system is still very difficult to solve, mainly because the boundary conditions involve the unknown function η. First fallback: suppress dimensions! @' @η = 0 = 0 @y @y Second fallback: linearize! η(x; t) = a cos(k0x − !0t) a h This ansatz satisfies our system when 2 !0 = gk0 tanh(k0h) dispersion relation ) phase velocity c2 = g tanh(k h). k0 0 In the shallow water limit k0h ! 0, 2 2 !0 = ghk0 p No dispersion, waves with speed c = gh Solitary waves: discovery John Scott Russell (1808{1882): scientist, civil engineer, naval architect, shipbuilder. In 1834 he started performing experiments along the Union Canal, near Edimburgh, to find the most efficient design for canal boats. One day he noticed a strange phenomenon... Solitary waves: discovery I was observing the motion of a boat which was rapidly drawn along a narrow channel by a pair of horses, when the boat suddenly stopped. Not so the mass of water in the channel which it had put in motion; it accumulated round the prow of the vessel in a state of violent agitation, then suddenly leaving it behind, rolled forward with great velocity, assuming the form of a large solitary elevation, a rounded, smooth and well-defined heap of water, which continued its course along the channel apparently without change of form or diminution of speed. Solitary waves: discovery I followed it on horseback, and overtook it still rolling on at a rate of some eight or nine miles an hour, preserving its original figure some thirty feet long and a foot to a foot and a half in height. Its height gradually diminished, and after a chase of one or two miles I lost it in the windings of the channel. Such, in the month of August 1834, was my first chance interview with that singular and beautiful phenomenon which I have called the Wave of Translation. \Report on waves", 1844 (and later in the report: the Great Primary Wave of Translation) Solitary waves: discovery Key characteristics of Russell's wave of translation: single hump (not periodic); stability in time (they do not flatten or steepen); speed pg(h + a) (depends on the depth of the channel and the amplitude of the wave). These features could not be explained using the theory of water waves available at the time. Stokes 1846: Thus the degradation in the height of such waves, which Mr. Russell observed, [...] is an essential characteristic of a solitary wave. It is true that this conclusion depends on an investigation which applies strictly to indefinitely small motions only: but [...] to disprove a general proposition it is G. G. Stokes (1819{1903) sufficient to disprove a particular case. Solitary waves: reception Airy 1845: We are not disposed to recognize this wave as deserving the epithets \great" or \primary" [...] and we conceive that, ever since it was known that the theory of shallow waves of great length was contained in the [linear wave] equation, the theory of the solitary wave has been perfectly well known. G. B. Airy (1801{1892) Solitary waves: reception Airy 1845: We are not disposed to recognize this wave as deserving the epithets \great" or \primary" [...] and we conceive that, ever since it was known that the theory of shallow waves of great length was contained in the [linear wave] equation, the theory of the solitary wave has been perfectly well known.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abelian Solutions of the Soliton Equations and Riemann–Schottky Problems
    Russian Math. Surveys 63:6 1011–1022 c 2008 RAS(DoM) and LMS Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 63:6 19–30 DOI 10.1070/RM2008v063n06ABEH004576 Abelian solutions of the soliton equations and Riemann–Schottky problems I. M. Krichever Abstract. The present article is an exposition of the author’s talk at the conference dedicated to the 70th birthday of S. P. Novikov. The talk con- tained the proof of Welters’ conjecture which proposes a solution of the clas- sical Riemann–Schottky problem of characterizing the Jacobians of smooth algebraic curves in terms of the existence of a trisecant of the associated Kummer variety, and a solution of another classical problem of algebraic geometry, that of characterizing the Prym varieties of unramified covers. Contents 1. Introduction 1011 2. Welters’ trisecant conjecture 1014 3. The problem of characterization of Prym varieties 1017 4. Abelian solutions of the soliton equations 1018 Bibliography 1020 1. Introduction The famous Novikov conjecture which asserts that the Jacobians of smooth alge- braic curves are precisely those indecomposable principally polarized Abelian vari- eties whose theta-functions provide explicit solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili (KP) equation, fundamentally changed the relations between the classical algebraic geometry of Riemann surfaces and the theory of soliton equations. It turns out that the finite-gap, or algebro-geometric, theory of integration of non-linear equa- tions developed in the mid-1970s can provide a powerful tool for approaching the fundamental problems of the geometry of Abelian varieties. The basic tool of the general construction proposed by the author [1], [2]which g+k 1 establishes a correspondence between algebro-geometric data Γ,Pα,zα,S − (Γ) and solutions of some soliton equation, is the notion of Baker–Akhiezer{ function.} Here Γis a smooth algebraic curve of genus g with marked points Pα, in whose g+k 1 neighborhoods we fix local coordinates zα, and S − (Γ) is a symmetric prod- uct of the curve.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 2 the Schottky Problem
    The Schottky problem and second order theta functions Bert van Geemen December Introduction The Schottky problem arose in the work of Riemann To a Riemann surface of genus g one can asso ciate a p erio d matrix which is an element of a space H of dimension g g Since the g Riemann surfaces themselves dep end on only g parameters if g the question arises as to how one can characterize the set of p erio d matrices of Riemann surfaces This is the Schottky problem There have b een many approaches and a few of them have b een succesfull All of them exploit a complex variety a ppav and a subvariety the theta divisor which one can asso ciate to a p oint in H When the p oint is the p erio d matrix of a Riemann surface this variety is g known as the Jacobian of the Riemann surface A careful study of the geometry and the functions on these varieties reveals that Jacobians and their theta divisors have various curious prop erties Now one attempts to show that such a prop erty characterizes Jacobians We refer to M Lectures III and IV for a nice exp osition of four such metho ds to vdG B D for overviews of later results and V for a newer approach In these notes we discuss a particular approach to the Schottky problem which has its origin the work of Schottky and Jung and unpublished work of Riemann It uses the fact that to a genus g curve one can asso ciate certain ab elian varieties of dimension g the Prym varieties In our presentation we emphasize an intrinsic line bundle on a ppav principally p olarized ab elian variety and the action
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Mikio Sato
    Interview with Mikio Sato Mikio Sato is a mathematician of great depth and originality. He was born in Japan in 1928 and re- ceived his Ph.D. from the University of Tokyo in 1963. He was a professor at Osaka University and the University of Tokyo before moving to the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences (RIMS) at Ky- oto University in 1970. He served as the director of RIMS from 1987 to 1991. He is now a professor emeritus at Kyoto University. Among Sato’s many honors are the Asahi Prize of Science (1969), the Japan Academy Prize (1976), the Person of Cultural Merit Award of the Japanese Education Ministry (1984), the Fujiwara Prize (1987), the Schock Prize of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (1997), and the Wolf Prize (2003). This interview was conducted in August 1990 by the late Emmanuel Andronikof; a brief account of his life appears in the sidebar. Sato’s contributions to mathematics are described in the article “Mikio Sato, a visionary of mathematics” by Pierre Schapira, in this issue of the Notices. Andronikof prepared the interview transcript, which was edited by Andrea D’Agnolo of the Univer- sità degli Studi di Padova. Masaki Kashiwara of RIMS and Tetsuji Miwa of Kyoto University helped in various ways, including checking the interview text and assembling the list of papers by Sato. The Notices gratefully acknowledges all of these contributions. —Allyn Jackson Learning Mathematics in Post-War Japan When I entered the middle school in Tokyo in Andronikof: What was it like, learning mathemat- 1941, I was already lagging behind: in Japan, the ics in post-war Japan? school year starts in early April, and I was born in Sato: You know, there is a saying that goes like late April 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • Tate Receives 2010 Abel Prize
    Tate Receives 2010 Abel Prize The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters John Tate is a prime architect of this has awarded the Abel Prize for 2010 to John development. Torrence Tate, University of Texas at Austin, Tate’s 1950 thesis on Fourier analy- for “his vast and lasting impact on the theory of sis in number fields paved the way numbers.” The Abel Prize recognizes contributions for the modern theory of automor- of extraordinary depth and influence to the math- phic forms and their L-functions. ematical sciences and has been awarded annually He revolutionized global class field since 2003. It carries a cash award of 6,000,000 theory with Emil Artin, using novel Norwegian kroner (approximately US$1 million). techniques of group cohomology. John Tate received the Abel Prize from His Majesty With Jonathan Lubin, he recast local King Harald at an award ceremony in Oslo, Norway, class field theory by the ingenious on May 25, 2010. use of formal groups. Tate’s invention of rigid analytic spaces spawned the John Tate Biographical Sketch whole field of rigid analytic geometry. John Torrence Tate was born on March 13, 1925, He found a p-adic analogue of Hodge theory, now in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He received his B.A. in called Hodge-Tate theory, which has blossomed mathematics from Harvard University in 1946 and into another central technique of modern algebraic his Ph.D. in 1950 from Princeton University under number theory. the direction of Emil Artin. He was affiliated with A wealth of further essential mathematical ideas Princeton University from 1950 to 1953 and with and constructions were initiated by Tate, includ- Columbia University from 1953 to 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter37.Pdf
    CONTENTS EDITORIAL TEAM EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ROBIN WILSON Department of Pure Mathematics The Open University Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK e-mail: [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITORS STEEN MARKVORSEN Department of Mathematics Technical University of Denmark Building 303 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark NEWSLETTER No. 37 e-mail: [email protected] KRZYSZTOF CIESIELSKI September 2000 Mathematics Institute Jagiellonian University Reymonta 4 30-059 Kraków, Poland EMS News : Agenda, Editorial, 3ecm report, Summer Schools ...................... 2 e-mail: [email protected] KATHLEEN QUINN The Open University [address as above] Mathematical Modelling in the Biosciences (Philip Maini) .......................... 16 e-mail: [email protected] SPECIALIST EDITORS EMS Poster Competition ............................................................................... 19 INTERVIEWS Steen Markvorsen [address as above] SOCIETIES Interview with Martin Grötschel ................................................................... 20 Krzysztof Ciesielski [address as above] EDUCATION Vinicio Villani Interview with Bernt Wegner ........................................................................ 24 Dipartimento di Matematica Via Bounarotti, 2 56127 Pisa, Italy A stamp for World Mathematical Year ..........................................................27 e-mail: [email protected] MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS Paul Jainta Societies: The London Mathematical Society ................................................ 28 Werkvolkstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete and Complex Algorithms for Curves
    Discrete and Complex Algorithms for Curves Lynn Chua Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2020-42 http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2020/EECS-2020-42.html May 11, 2020 Copyright © 2020, by the author(s). All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission. Discrete and Complex Algorithms for Curves by Lynn Chua A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Alessandro Chiesa, Co-chair Professor Bernd Sturmfels, Co-chair Professor Kenneth Ribet Spring 2020 The dissertation of Lynn Chua, titled Discrete and Complex Algorithms for Curves, is approved: Co-chair Date Co-chair Date Date University of California, Berkeley Discrete and Complex Algorithms for Curves Copyright 2020 by Lynn Chua 1 Abstract Discrete and Complex Algorithms for Curves by Lynn Chua Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Alessandro Chiesa, Co-chair Professor Bernd Sturmfels, Co-chair This dissertation consists of two parts. The first part pertains to the Schottky problem, which asks to characterize Jacobians of curves amongst abelian varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society
    CALENDAR OF AMS MEETINGS THIS CALENDAR lists all meetings which have been approved by the Council prior to the date this issue of the NOTICES was sent to press. The summer and annual meetings are joint meetings of the Mathematical Association of America and the American Mathematical Society. The meeting dates which fall rather far in the future are subject to change; this is particularly true of meetings to which no numbers have yet been assigned. Programs of the meetings will appear in the issues indicated below. First and second announcements of the meetings will have appeared in earlier issues. ABSTRACTS OF CONTRIBUTED PAPERS should be submitted on special forms which are available in most de­ partments of mathematics; forms can also be obtained by writing to the headquarters of the Society. Abstracts of papers to be presented at the meeting in person must be received at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Island, on or before the deadline for the meeting. Note that the deadline for abstracts to be considered for presentation at special sessions is three weeks earlier than that given below. For additional information consult the meeting announcement and the list of organizers of special sessions. MEETING ABSTRACTS NUMBER DATE PLACE DEADLINE for ISSUE 768 August 21-25, 1979 Duluth, Minnesota JUNE 12 August (83rd Summer Meeting) 769 October 20-21, 1979 Washington, D.C. AUGUST 22} October 770 November 2-3, 1979 Kent, Ohio AUGUST 27 771 November 9-10, 1979 Birmingham, Alabama SEPTEMBER 19 } November 772 November 16-17,
    [Show full text]
  • Elliptic Curves and Modularity
    Elliptic curves and modularity Manami Roy Fordham University July 30, 2021 PRiME (Pomona Research in Mathematics Experience) Manami Roy Elliptic curves and modularity Outline elliptic curves reduction of elliptic curves over finite fields the modularity theorem with an explicit example some applications of the modularity theorem generalization the modularity theorem Elliptic curves Elliptic curves Over Q, we can write an elliptic curve E as 2 3 2 E : y + a1xy + a3y = x + a2x + a4x + a6 or more commonly E : y 2 = x3 + Ax + B 3 2 where ai ; A; B 2 Q and ∆(E) = −16(4A + 27B ) 6= 0. ∆(E) is called the discriminant of E. The conductor NE of a rational elliptic curve is a product of the form Y fp NE = p : pj∆ Example The elliptic curve E : y 2 = x3 − 432x + 8208 12 12 has discriminant ∆ = −2 · 3 · 11 and conductor NE = 11. A minimal model of E is 2 3 2 Emin : y + y = x − x with discriminant ∆min = −11. Example Elliptic curves of finite fields 2 3 2 E : y + y = x − x over F113 Elliptic curves of finite fields Let us consider E~ : y 2 + y = x3 − x2 ¯ ¯ ¯ over the finite field of p elements Fp = Z=pZ = f0; 1; 2 ··· ; p − 1g. ~ Specifically, we consider the solution of E over Fp. Let ~ 2 2 3 2 #E(Fp) = 1 + #f(x; y) 2 Fp : y + y ≡ x − x (mod p)g and ~ ap(E) = p + 1 − #E(Fp): Elliptic curves of finite fields E~ : y 2 − y = x3 − x2 ~ ~ p #E(Fp) ap(E) = p + 1 − #E(Fp) 2 5 −2 3 5 −1 5 5 1 7 10 −2 13 10 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • A Selection of New Arrivals September 2017
    A selection of new arrivals September 2017 Rare and important books & manuscripts in science and medicine, by Christian Westergaard. Flæsketorvet 68 – 1711 København V – Denmark Cell: (+45)27628014 www.sophiararebooks.com AMPERE, Andre-Marie. Mémoire. INSCRIBED BY AMPÈRE TO FARADAY AMPÈRE, André-Marie. Mémoire sur l’action mutuelle d’un conducteur voltaïque et d’un aimant. Offprint from Nouveaux Mémoires de l’Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Bruxelles, tome IV, 1827. Bound with 18 other pamphlets (listed below). [Colophon:] Brussels: Hayez, Imprimeur de l’Académie Royale, 1827. $38,000 4to (265 x 205 mm). Contemporary quarter-cloth and plain boards (very worn and broken, with most of the spine missing), entirely unrestored. Preserved in a custom cloth box. First edition of the very rare offprint, with the most desirable imaginable provenance: this copy is inscribed by Ampère to Michael Faraday. It thus links the two great founders of electromagnetism, following its discovery by Hans Christian Oersted (1777-1851) in April 1820. The discovery by Ampère (1775-1836), late in the same year, of the force acting between current-carrying conductors was followed a year later by Faraday’s (1791-1867) first great discovery, that of electromagnetic rotation, the first conversion of electrical into mechanical energy. This development was a challenge to Ampère’s mathematically formulated explanation of electromagnetism as a manifestation of currents of electrical fluids surrounding ‘electrodynamic’ molecules; indeed, Faraday directly criticised Ampère’s theory, preferring his own explanation in terms of ‘lines of force’ (which had to wait for James Clerk Maxwell (1831-79) for a precise mathematical formulation).
    [Show full text]
  • THÔNG TIN TOÁN HỌC Tháng 7 Năm 2008 Tập 12 Số 2
    Hội Toán Học Việt Nam THÔNG TIN TOÁN HỌC Tháng 7 Năm 2008 Tập 12 Số 2 Lưu hành nội bộ Th«ng Tin To¸n Häc to¸n häc. Bµi viÕt xin göi vÒ toµ so¹n. NÕu bµi ®−îc ®¸nh m¸y tÝnh, xin göi kÌm theo file (chñ yÕu theo ph«ng ch÷ unicode, • Tæng biªn tËp: hoÆc .VnTime). Lª TuÊn Hoa • Ban biªn tËp: • Mäi liªn hÖ víi b¶n tin xin göi Ph¹m Trµ ¢n vÒ: NguyÔn H÷u D− Lª MËu H¶i B¶n tin: Th«ng Tin To¸n Häc NguyÔn Lª H−¬ng ViÖn To¸n Häc NguyÔn Th¸i S¬n 18 Hoµng Quèc ViÖt, 10307 Hµ Néi Lª V¨n ThuyÕt §ç Long V©n e-mail: NguyÔn §«ng Yªn [email protected] • B¶n tin Th«ng Tin To¸n Häc nh»m môc ®Ých ph¶n ¸nh c¸c sinh ho¹t chuyªn m«n trong céng ®ång to¸n häc ViÖt nam vµ quèc tÕ. B¶n tin ra th−êng k× 4- 6 sè trong mét n¨m. • ThÓ lÖ göi bµi: Bµi viÕt b»ng tiÕng viÖt. TÊt c¶ c¸c bµi, th«ng tin vÒ sinh ho¹t to¸n häc ë c¸c khoa (bé m«n) to¸n, vÒ h−íng nghiªn cøu hoÆc trao ®æi vÒ ph−¬ng ph¸p nghiªn cøu vµ gi¶ng d¹y ®Òu ®−îc hoan nghªnh. B¶n tin còng nhËn ®¨ng © Héi To¸n Häc ViÖt Nam c¸c bµi giíi thiÖu tiÒm n¨ng khoa häc cña c¸c c¬ së còng nh− c¸c bµi giíi thiÖu c¸c nhµ Chào mừng ĐẠI HỘI TOÁN HỌC VIỆT NAM LẦN THỨ VII Quy Nhơn – 04-08/08/2008 Sau một thời gian tích cực chuẩn bị, phát triển nghiên cứu Toán học của nước Đại hội Toán học Toàn quốc lần thứ VII ta giai đoạn vừa qua trước khi bước vào sẽ diễn ra, từ ngày 4 đến 8 tháng Tám tại Đại hội đại biểu.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 56/2011 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2011/56 Stratified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry Organised by Markus Banagl, Heidelberg Ulrich Bunke, Regensburg Shmuel Weinberger, Chicago December 11th – December 17th, 2011 Abstract. For manifolds, topological properties such as Poincar´eduality and invariants such as the signature and characteristic classes, results and techniques from complex algebraic geometry such as the Hirzebruch-Riemann- Roch theorem, and results from global analysis such as the Atiyah-Singer in- dex theorem, worked hand in hand in the past to weave a tight web of knowl- edge. Individually, many of the above results are in the meantime available for singular stratified spaces as well. The 2011 Oberwolfach workshop “Strat- ified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry” discussed these with the specific aim of cross-fertilization in the three contributing fields. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 57N80, 58A35, 32S60, 55N33, 57R20. Introduction by the Organisers The workshop Stratified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry, or- ganised by Markus Banagl (Heidelberg), Ulrich Bunke (Regensburg) and Shmuel Weinberger (Chicago) was held December 11th – 17th, 2011. It had three main components: 1) Three special introductory lectures by Jonathan Woolf (Liver- pool), Shoji Yokura (Kagoshima) and Eric Leichtnam (Paris); 2) 20 research talks, each 60 minutes; and 3) a problem session, led by Shmuel Weinberger. In total, this international meeting was attended by 45 participants from Canada, China, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The “Oberwolfach Leibniz Graduate Students” grants enabled five advanced doctoral students from Germany and the USA to attend the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Sciences Meetings and Conferences Section
    OTICES OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Richard M. Schoen Awarded 1989 Bacher Prize page 225 Everybody Counts Summary page 227 MARCH 1989, VOLUME 36, NUMBER 3 Providence, Rhode Island, USA ISSN 0002-9920 Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences This calendar lists all meetings which have been approved prior to Mathematical Society in the issue corresponding to that of the Notices the date this issue of Notices was sent to the press. The summer which contains the program of the meeting. Abstracts should be sub­ and annual meetings are joint meetings of the Mathematical Associ­ mitted on special forms which are available in many departments of ation of America and the American Mathematical Society. The meet­ mathematics and from the headquarters office of the Society. Ab­ ing dates which fall rather far in the future are subject to change; this stracts of papers to be presented at the meeting must be received is particularly true of meetings to which no numbers have been as­ at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Island, on signed. Programs of the meetings will appear in the issues indicated or before the deadline given below for the meeting. Note that the below. First and supplementary announcements of the meetings will deadline for abstracts for consideration for presentation at special have appeared in earlier issues. sessions is usually three weeks earlier than that specified below. For Abstracts of papers presented at a meeting of the Society are pub­ additional information, consult the meeting announcements and the lished in the journal Abstracts of papers presented to the American list of organizers of special sessions.
    [Show full text]