Elliptic Curves and Modularity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elliptic Curves and Modularity Elliptic curves and modularity Manami Roy Fordham University July 30, 2021 PRiME (Pomona Research in Mathematics Experience) Manami Roy Elliptic curves and modularity Outline elliptic curves reduction of elliptic curves over finite fields the modularity theorem with an explicit example some applications of the modularity theorem generalization the modularity theorem Elliptic curves Elliptic curves Over Q, we can write an elliptic curve E as 2 3 2 E : y + a1xy + a3y = x + a2x + a4x + a6 or more commonly E : y 2 = x3 + Ax + B 3 2 where ai ; A; B 2 Q and ∆(E) = −16(4A + 27B ) 6= 0. ∆(E) is called the discriminant of E. The conductor NE of a rational elliptic curve is a product of the form Y fp NE = p : pj∆ Example The elliptic curve E : y 2 = x3 − 432x + 8208 12 12 has discriminant ∆ = −2 · 3 · 11 and conductor NE = 11. A minimal model of E is 2 3 2 Emin : y + y = x − x with discriminant ∆min = −11. Example Elliptic curves of finite fields 2 3 2 E : y + y = x − x over F113 Elliptic curves of finite fields Let us consider E~ : y 2 + y = x3 − x2 ¯ ¯ ¯ over the finite field of p elements Fp = Z=pZ = f0; 1; 2 ··· ; p − 1g. ~ Specifically, we consider the solution of E over Fp. Let ~ 2 2 3 2 #E(Fp) = 1 + #f(x; y) 2 Fp : y + y ≡ x − x (mod p)g and ~ ap(E) = p + 1 − #E(Fp): Elliptic curves of finite fields E~ : y 2 − y = x3 − x2 ~ ~ p #E(Fp) ap(E) = p + 1 − #E(Fp) 2 5 −2 3 5 −1 5 5 1 7 10 −2 13 10 4 . 47 40 8 Elliptic curves of finite fields ~ Note that E=F11 is not an elliptic curve anymore since 11 j ∆. In this case, we get a curve of the shape: 2 3 2 For E : y − y = x − x , a11(E) = 1. For the \bad" primes that divide ∆, one defines ap to be 0, 1, or −1, depending on the type of singularity E has when reduced mod p Some \nice" functions 1 1 Y n 2 11n 2 X n f (q) = q (1 − q ) (1 − q ) = an(f )q : n=1 n=1 q − 2q2 − q3 + 2q4 + q5 + 2q6 − 2q7 − 2q9 − 2q10 + q11 − 2q12 + 4q13 + 4q14 −q15 −4q16 −2q17 +4q18 +2q20 +2q21 −2q22 −q23 −4q25 −8q26 + 5q27 −4q28 +2q30 +7q31 +8q32 −q33 +4q34 −2q35 −4q36 +3q37 −4q39 − 8q41 − 4q42 − 6q43 + 2q44 − 2q45 + 2q46 + 8q47 + 4q48 − 3q49 + O(q50). ap(E) = ap(f ) for all primes p Some \nice" functions 2πiz Now assume q = e where z = x + iy 2 C with y > 0. Then 1 1 Y n 2 11n 2 X 2πinz f (z) = q (1 − q ) (1 − q ) = an(f )e : n=1 n=1 az + b f = (cz + d)2 f (z); a b 2 Γ (11) = ZZ \ SL(2; ) cz + d c d 0 11ZZ Z This function is known as a modular form. Modularity theorem Elliptic curve E=Q Andrew Wiles Modular form f of of conductor N Breuil, Conrad, weight 2 and level N Diamond,Taylor ap(f ) = ap(E) for all p: 1 P an(f ) Q −s 1−2s L(s; f ) = ns = (1 − ap(f )p + p ). n=1 p 1 P an(E) Q −s 1−2s L(s; E) = ns = (1 − ap(E)p + p ). n=1 p L(s; f ) = L(s; E) Little bit of history of the modularity theorem Taniyama-Shimura-Weil conjecture Yutaka Taniyama Goro Shimura Andr´eWeil Andrew Wiles Richard Taylor and Andrew Wiles (1995) -proof for all semistable elliptic curves. Christophe Breuil, Brian Conrad, Fred Diamond, Richard Taylor (2001) - proof for the full conjecture. The conjecture became known as the modularity theorem. Fermat's Last Theorem Theorem xn + y n = zn has no positive integer solutions for n > 2. Suppose an + bn = cn with a; b; c > 0 and n > 3 (n = 3: Euler). Consider the elliptic curve E=Q defined as y 2 = x(x − an)(x − bn) J.P. Serre and Ken Ribet proved that E is not modular. J.P. Serre Ken Ribet E is semistable, hence modular by Wiles (with Taylor). Other forms of modularity theorem Recall Γ (N) = ZZ \ SL(2; ). 0 NZZ Z X0(N): the modular curve such that the set of its complex points is nat- ∗ urally isomorphic to the quotient Γ0(N)nH as a Riemann surface. Theorem Let E be an elliptic curve over C with j(E) 2 Q. Then for some positive integer N there exists a surjective holomorphic function of compact Riemann surfaces X0(N) −! E: Theorem Let E be an elliptic curve over Q. Then for some positive integer N there exists a surjective morphism over Q X0(N)alg −! E: Coming back to elliptic curves over Fp ~ Recall that given an elliptic curve E=Q we can consider E over Fp. What ~ can we say about #E(Fp)? The following theorem of Hasse was originally conjectured by Emil Artin. Theorem (Hesse, 1933) ~ 1=2 jap(E)j = jp + 1 − #E(Fp)j ≤ 2p Emil Artin Helmut Hasse a (E) pp Then xp = 2 p is a real number in the interval [ − 1; 1]. Question: What is the distribution of xp as p varies? Is it uniform? Sato-Tate Conjecture Let E=Q be an elliptic curve without complex multiplication. Then the a (E) pp xp = 2 p have a semi-circular distribution in [−1; 1]. Mikio Sato John Tate For −1 ≤ α < β ≤ 1, a (E) pp β #fp ≤ T : α ≤ 2 p ≤ βg 2 Z p lim = 1 − x2dx: T !1 #fp ≤ T g π α Sato-Tate Conjecture −1=2 In fact, we can write ap(E)p = 2 cos(θp), where θp 2 [0; π]. Then θp are equidistributed (as p varies) in [0; π] according to the function 2 2 π sin (θ). For 0 ≤ α < β ≤ π, #fp ≤ T : α ≤ θ ≤ βg 2 Z β lim p = sin2 θ dθ: T !1 #fp ≤ T g π α Theorem (Taylor et al., 2008 and 2011) Sato-Tate conjecture is true if any elliptic curve without complex multiplication. Example 1 Consider the curve E : y 2 + y = x3 − x2 of conductor 11. Example 1 Figure: E : y 2 + y = x 3 − x 2 Example 2 Consider the curve E : y 2 = x3 − x of conductor 32. Another application of the modularity theorem 1 1 Y n 2 11n 2 X 2πinz f (z) = q (1 − q ) (1 − q ) = an(f )e : n=1 n=1 It follows from the modularity Theorem: ap(f ) = ap(E), where E : y 2 + y = x3 − x2 ap(f ) Sato-Tate Conjecture: p are equidistributed in [−1; 1]. 2 p Sato-Tate conjecture for modular forms 1 1 Y X ∆(z) = q (1−qn)24 = q−24q2+252q3−1472q4+··· = τ(n)e2πinz : n=1 n=1 11 11 Ramanujan 1917, Deligne 1971: jτ(p)j ≤ 2p 2 ) τ(p) = 2p 2 cos(θp). Srinivasa Ramanujan Pierre Deligne Sato-Tate Conjecture: θp are equidistributed (as p varies) in [0; π] according to the function τ(p) 2 sin2(θ). In other words are equidistributed in [−2; 2]. π p11=2 Equidistribution of eigenvalues of modular forms P1 2πinz f : a modular form with level N and a weight k; f (z) = n=1 an(f )e . Sk (N): the vector space of these functions. Consider some linear operators Tp on Sk (N): Tpf = ap(f )f : a (f ) The values p (as the prime p varies) are equidistributed on [−2; 2]. p(k−1)=2 Automorphic forms Recall that a modular form f : H! C satisfies az + b f = (cz + d)k f (z); a b 2 Γ (N) = ZZ \ SL(2; ): cz + d c d 0 NZZ Z Consider a function Φf : SL(2; R) ! C such that −k a b Φf (g) = (ci + d) f (g · i); g = c d 2 SL(2; R): Then for any γ 2 Γ0(N), Φf (γg) = Φf (g): This is called an automorphic form. Question Elliptic curves Automorphic forms modular forms on groups like SL(2) Equidistribution results Are there equidistribution respect to results for certain measure automorphic forms? 1 P 1 L-functions ζ(s) = ns n=1 Langlands Automorphic world Geometric world program Galois modular forms, elliptic representations automorphic forms curves 1 P 1 L-functions ζ(s) = ns n=1 Langlands Automorphic world Geometric world program Galois modular forms, elliptic representations automorphic forms curves L-functions Langlands Automorphic world Geometric world program modular forms, Galois elliptic automorphic representations curves forms Thank you for your attention!.
Recommended publications
  • On Mod P Local-Global Compatibility for Unramified GL by John Enns A
    On mod p local-global compatibility for unramified GL3 by John Enns A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Mathematics University of Toronto c Copyright 2018 by John Enns Abstract On mod p local-global compatibility for unramified GL3 John Enns Doctor of Philosophy Department of Mathematics University of Toronto 2018 Let F=F + be a CM number field and wjp a place of F lying over a place of F + that splits in F . Ifr ¯ : GF ! GLn(Fp) is a global Galois representation automorphic with respect to a definite + 0 unitary group over F then there is a naturally associated GLn(Fw)-representation H (¯r) over 0 Fp constructed using mod p automorphic forms, and it is hoped that H (¯r) will correspond to r¯j under a conjectural mod p local Langlands correspondence. The goal of the thesis is to GFw study how to recover the data ofr ¯j from H0(¯r) in certain cases. GFw Assume that Fw is unramified and n = 3. Under certain technical hypotheses onr ¯, we give an explicit recipe to find all the data ofr ¯j inside the GL (F )-action on H0(¯r) when GFw 3 w r¯j is maximally nonsplit, Fontaine-Laffaille, generic, and has a unique Serre weight. This GFw generalizes work of Herzig, Le and Morra [HLM17] who found analogous results when Fw = Qp as well as work of Breuil and Diamond [BD14] in the case of unramified GL2. ii For Cathleen iii Acknowledgements I want to thank my advisor Florian for suggesting this problem and for his advice since the beginning stages of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Mikio Sato
    Interview with Mikio Sato Mikio Sato is a mathematician of great depth and originality. He was born in Japan in 1928 and re- ceived his Ph.D. from the University of Tokyo in 1963. He was a professor at Osaka University and the University of Tokyo before moving to the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences (RIMS) at Ky- oto University in 1970. He served as the director of RIMS from 1987 to 1991. He is now a professor emeritus at Kyoto University. Among Sato’s many honors are the Asahi Prize of Science (1969), the Japan Academy Prize (1976), the Person of Cultural Merit Award of the Japanese Education Ministry (1984), the Fujiwara Prize (1987), the Schock Prize of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (1997), and the Wolf Prize (2003). This interview was conducted in August 1990 by the late Emmanuel Andronikof; a brief account of his life appears in the sidebar. Sato’s contributions to mathematics are described in the article “Mikio Sato, a visionary of mathematics” by Pierre Schapira, in this issue of the Notices. Andronikof prepared the interview transcript, which was edited by Andrea D’Agnolo of the Univer- sità degli Studi di Padova. Masaki Kashiwara of RIMS and Tetsuji Miwa of Kyoto University helped in various ways, including checking the interview text and assembling the list of papers by Sato. The Notices gratefully acknowledges all of these contributions. —Allyn Jackson Learning Mathematics in Post-War Japan When I entered the middle school in Tokyo in Andronikof: What was it like, learning mathemat- 1941, I was already lagging behind: in Japan, the ics in post-war Japan? school year starts in early April, and I was born in Sato: You know, there is a saying that goes like late April 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • Tate Receives 2010 Abel Prize
    Tate Receives 2010 Abel Prize The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters John Tate is a prime architect of this has awarded the Abel Prize for 2010 to John development. Torrence Tate, University of Texas at Austin, Tate’s 1950 thesis on Fourier analy- for “his vast and lasting impact on the theory of sis in number fields paved the way numbers.” The Abel Prize recognizes contributions for the modern theory of automor- of extraordinary depth and influence to the math- phic forms and their L-functions. ematical sciences and has been awarded annually He revolutionized global class field since 2003. It carries a cash award of 6,000,000 theory with Emil Artin, using novel Norwegian kroner (approximately US$1 million). techniques of group cohomology. John Tate received the Abel Prize from His Majesty With Jonathan Lubin, he recast local King Harald at an award ceremony in Oslo, Norway, class field theory by the ingenious on May 25, 2010. use of formal groups. Tate’s invention of rigid analytic spaces spawned the John Tate Biographical Sketch whole field of rigid analytic geometry. John Torrence Tate was born on March 13, 1925, He found a p-adic analogue of Hodge theory, now in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He received his B.A. in called Hodge-Tate theory, which has blossomed mathematics from Harvard University in 1946 and into another central technique of modern algebraic his Ph.D. in 1950 from Princeton University under number theory. the direction of Emil Artin. He was affiliated with A wealth of further essential mathematical ideas Princeton University from 1950 to 1953 and with and constructions were initiated by Tate, includ- Columbia University from 1953 to 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on Potential Modularity and Its Applications
    Seminar on Potential Modularity and its Applications Panagiotis Tsaknias April 1, 2011 1 Intro A main theme of modern (algebraic) number theory is the study of the absolute Galois group GQ of Q and more specifically its representations. Although one dimensional Galois representations admit an elegant description through class field theory, the general case is nowhere near that easy to handle. The well known Langlands Program is a far reaching web of conjectures that was devised in effort to describe such representations. On one side one has analytic objects (automorphic representations) whose behavior is\better understood", i.e. the L-function associated with them admits an analytic continuation to the whole complex plane and satisfies a functional equation. On the other side, one has L-series that come from Galois representations and whose analytic continuation and functional equation is difficult to show. The Langlands program suggests that one can indirectly prove that by showing that the Galois representation in question is associated with an automorphic representation, i.e. they are associated with the same L-function. One of the first examples of this approach was the classical proof that CM elliptic curves are modular, and therefore their L-function admits an analytic continuation and satisfies a functional equation. For more general classes of elliptic curves the first major break through was done by Wiles [22] and Taylor-Wiles [19] who proved that all semisimple elliptic curves are modular. Subsequent efforts culminating with the work done by Breuil-Conrad-Diamond-Taylor [2] finally proved modularity for all elliptic curves over Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Serre Weights and Breuil's Lattice Conjecture In
    SERRE WEIGHTS AND BREUIL'S LATTICE CONJECTURE IN DIMENSION THREE DANIEL LE, BAO V. LE HUNG, BRANDON LEVIN, AND STEFANO MORRA Abstract. We prove in generic situations that the lattice in a tame type induced by the com- pleted cohomology of a U(3)-arithmetic manifold is purely local, i.e., only depends on the Galois representation at places above p. This is a generalization to GL3 of the lattice conjecture of Breuil. In the process, we also prove the geometric Breuil{M´ezardconjecture for (tamely) potentially crys- talline deformation rings with Hodge-Tate weights (2; 1; 0) as well as the Serre weight conjectures of [Her09] over an unramified field extending the results of [LLHLM18]. We also prove results in modular representation theory about lattices in Deligne{Luzstig representations for the group GL3(Fq). Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Breuil's lattice conjecture 3 1.2. Serre weight and Breuil{M´ezardconjectures 4 1.3. Representation theory results 5 1.4. Notation 6 2. Extension graph 10 2.1. Definition and properties of the extension graph 10 2.2. Types and Serre weights 13 2.3. Combinatorics of types and Serre weights 14 3. Serre weight conjectures 20 3.1. Background 20 3.2. Etale´ '-modules with descent data 22 3.3. Semisimple Kisin modules 24 3.4. Shapes and Serre weights 27 3.5. Serre weight conjectures 28 3.6. The geometric Breuil{M´ezardconjecture 35 4. Lattices in generic Deligne{Lusztig representations 56 4.1. The classification statement 56 4.2. Injective envelopes 59 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • THÔNG TIN TOÁN HỌC Tháng 7 Năm 2008 Tập 12 Số 2
    Hội Toán Học Việt Nam THÔNG TIN TOÁN HỌC Tháng 7 Năm 2008 Tập 12 Số 2 Lưu hành nội bộ Th«ng Tin To¸n Häc to¸n häc. Bµi viÕt xin göi vÒ toµ so¹n. NÕu bµi ®−îc ®¸nh m¸y tÝnh, xin göi kÌm theo file (chñ yÕu theo ph«ng ch÷ unicode, • Tæng biªn tËp: hoÆc .VnTime). Lª TuÊn Hoa • Ban biªn tËp: • Mäi liªn hÖ víi b¶n tin xin göi Ph¹m Trµ ¢n vÒ: NguyÔn H÷u D− Lª MËu H¶i B¶n tin: Th«ng Tin To¸n Häc NguyÔn Lª H−¬ng ViÖn To¸n Häc NguyÔn Th¸i S¬n 18 Hoµng Quèc ViÖt, 10307 Hµ Néi Lª V¨n ThuyÕt §ç Long V©n e-mail: NguyÔn §«ng Yªn [email protected] • B¶n tin Th«ng Tin To¸n Häc nh»m môc ®Ých ph¶n ¸nh c¸c sinh ho¹t chuyªn m«n trong céng ®ång to¸n häc ViÖt nam vµ quèc tÕ. B¶n tin ra th−êng k× 4- 6 sè trong mét n¨m. • ThÓ lÖ göi bµi: Bµi viÕt b»ng tiÕng viÖt. TÊt c¶ c¸c bµi, th«ng tin vÒ sinh ho¹t to¸n häc ë c¸c khoa (bé m«n) to¸n, vÒ h−íng nghiªn cøu hoÆc trao ®æi vÒ ph−¬ng ph¸p nghiªn cøu vµ gi¶ng d¹y ®Òu ®−îc hoan nghªnh. B¶n tin còng nhËn ®¨ng © Héi To¸n Häc ViÖt Nam c¸c bµi giíi thiÖu tiÒm n¨ng khoa häc cña c¸c c¬ së còng nh− c¸c bµi giíi thiÖu c¸c nhµ Chào mừng ĐẠI HỘI TOÁN HỌC VIỆT NAM LẦN THỨ VII Quy Nhơn – 04-08/08/2008 Sau một thời gian tích cực chuẩn bị, phát triển nghiên cứu Toán học của nước Đại hội Toán học Toàn quốc lần thứ VII ta giai đoạn vừa qua trước khi bước vào sẽ diễn ra, từ ngày 4 đến 8 tháng Tám tại Đại hội đại biểu.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 56/2011 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2011/56 Stratified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry Organised by Markus Banagl, Heidelberg Ulrich Bunke, Regensburg Shmuel Weinberger, Chicago December 11th – December 17th, 2011 Abstract. For manifolds, topological properties such as Poincar´eduality and invariants such as the signature and characteristic classes, results and techniques from complex algebraic geometry such as the Hirzebruch-Riemann- Roch theorem, and results from global analysis such as the Atiyah-Singer in- dex theorem, worked hand in hand in the past to weave a tight web of knowl- edge. Individually, many of the above results are in the meantime available for singular stratified spaces as well. The 2011 Oberwolfach workshop “Strat- ified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry” discussed these with the specific aim of cross-fertilization in the three contributing fields. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 57N80, 58A35, 32S60, 55N33, 57R20. Introduction by the Organisers The workshop Stratified Spaces: Joining Analysis, Topology and Geometry, or- ganised by Markus Banagl (Heidelberg), Ulrich Bunke (Regensburg) and Shmuel Weinberger (Chicago) was held December 11th – 17th, 2011. It had three main components: 1) Three special introductory lectures by Jonathan Woolf (Liver- pool), Shoji Yokura (Kagoshima) and Eric Leichtnam (Paris); 2) 20 research talks, each 60 minutes; and 3) a problem session, led by Shmuel Weinberger. In total, this international meeting was attended by 45 participants from Canada, China, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The “Oberwolfach Leibniz Graduate Students” grants enabled five advanced doctoral students from Germany and the USA to attend the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Sciences Meetings and Conferences Section
    OTICES OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Richard M. Schoen Awarded 1989 Bacher Prize page 225 Everybody Counts Summary page 227 MARCH 1989, VOLUME 36, NUMBER 3 Providence, Rhode Island, USA ISSN 0002-9920 Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences This calendar lists all meetings which have been approved prior to Mathematical Society in the issue corresponding to that of the Notices the date this issue of Notices was sent to the press. The summer which contains the program of the meeting. Abstracts should be sub­ and annual meetings are joint meetings of the Mathematical Associ­ mitted on special forms which are available in many departments of ation of America and the American Mathematical Society. The meet­ mathematics and from the headquarters office of the Society. Ab­ ing dates which fall rather far in the future are subject to change; this stracts of papers to be presented at the meeting must be received is particularly true of meetings to which no numbers have been as­ at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Island, on signed. Programs of the meetings will appear in the issues indicated or before the deadline given below for the meeting. Note that the below. First and supplementary announcements of the meetings will deadline for abstracts for consideration for presentation at special have appeared in earlier issues. sessions is usually three weeks earlier than that specified below. For Abstracts of papers presented at a meeting of the Society are pub­ additional information, consult the meeting announcements and the lished in the journal Abstracts of papers presented to the American list of organizers of special sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Awards Winners in Mathematics: A
    International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology (IJAIST) ISSN: 2319:2682 Vol.3, No.10, October 2014 DOI:10.15693/ijaist/2014.v3i10.81-92 Major Awards Winners in Mathematics: A Bibliometric Study Rajani. S Dr. Ravi. B Research Scholar, Rani Channamma University, Deputy Librarian Belagavi & Professional Assistant, Bangalore University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad University Library, Bangalore II. MATHEMATICS AS A DISCIPLINE Abstract— The purpose of this paper is to study the bibliometric analysis of major awards like Fields Medal, Wolf Prize and Abel Mathematics is the discipline; it deals with concepts such Prize in Mathematics, as a discipline since 1936 to 2014. Totally as quantity, structure, space and change. It is use of abstraction there are 120 nominees of major awards are received in these and logical reasoning, from counting, calculation, honors. The data allow us to observe the evolution of the profiles of measurement and the study of the shapes and motions of winners and nominations during every year. The analysis shows physical objects. According to the Aristotle defined that top ranking of the author’s productivity in mathematics mathematics as "the science of quantity", and this definition discipline and also that would be the highest nominees received the prevailed until the 18th century. Benjamin Peirce called it "the award at Institutional wise and Country wise. competitors. The science that draws necessary conclusions". United States of America awardees got the highest percentage of about 50% in mathematics prize. According to David Hilbert said that "We are not speaking Index terms –Bibliometric, Mathematics, Awards and Nobel here of arbitrariness in any sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1605.00138V2 [Math.RT] 14 Feb 2017 Rnedsklvreduction
    INTRODUCTION TO W-ALGEBRAS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION THEORY TOMOYUKI ARAKAWA Abstract. These are lecture notes from author’s mini-course during Session 1: “Vertex algebras, W-algebras, and application” of INdAM Intensive research period “Perspectives in Lie Theory”, at the Centro di Ricerca Matematica Ennio De Giorgi, Pisa, Italy. December 9, 2014 – February 28, 2015. 1. Introduction This note is based on lectures given at the Centro di Ricerca Matematica Ennio De Giorgi, Pisa, in Winter of 2014–2015. They are aimed as an introduction to W -algebras and their representation theory. Since W -algebras appear in many areas of mathematics and physics there are certainly many other important topics untouched in the note, partly due to the limitation of the space and partly due to the author’s incapability. The W -algebras can be regarded as generalizations of affine Kac-Moody algebras and the Virasoro algebra. They appeared [Zam, FL, LF] in the study of the classifi- cation of two-dimensional rational conformal field theories. There are several ways to define W -algebras, but it was Feigin and Frenkel [FF1] who found the most con- ceptual definition of principal W -algebras that uses the quantized Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction, which is a version of Hamiltonian reduction. There are a lot of works on W -algebras (see [BS] and references therein) mostly by physicists in 1980’s and 1990’s, but they were mostly on principal W -algebras, that is, the W -algebras as- sociated with principal nilpotent elements. It was quite recent that Kac, Roan and Wakimoto [KRW] defined the W -algebra Wk(g,f) associated with a simple Lie al- gebra and its arbitrary nilpotent element f by generalizing the method of quantized arXiv:1605.00138v2 [math.RT] 14 Feb 2017 Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0704.3783V1 [Math.HO]
    Congruent numbers, elliptic curves, and the passage from the local to the global Chandan Singh Dalawat The ancient unsolved problem of congruent numbers has been reduced to one of the major questions of contemporary arithmetic : the finiteness of the number of curves over Q which become isomorphic at every place to a given curve. We give an elementary introduction to congruent numbers and their conjectural characterisation, discuss local-to-global issues leading to the finiteness problem, and list a few results and conjectures in the arithmetic theory of elliptic curves. The area α of a right triangle with sides a,b,c (so that a2 + b2 = c2) is given by 2α = ab. If a,b,c are rational, then so is α. Conversely, which rational numbers α arise as the area of a rational right triangle a,b,c ? This problem of characterising “congruent numbers” — areas of rational right triangles — is perhaps the oldest unsolved problem in all of Mathematics. It dates back to more than a thousand years and has been variously attributed to the Arabs, the Chinese, and the Indians. Three excellent accounts of the problem are available on the Web : Right triangles and elliptic curves by Karl Rubin, Le probl`eme des nombres congruents by Pierre Colmez, which also appears in the October 2006 issue arXiv:0704.3783v1 [math.HO] 28 Apr 2007 of the Gazette des math´ematiciens, and Franz Lemmermeyer’s translation Congruent numbers, elliptic curves, and modular forms of an article in French by Guy Henniart. A more elementary introduction is provided by the notes of a lecture in Hong Kong by John Coates, which have appeared in the August 2005 issue of the Quaterly journal of pure and applied mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Notarization. I Have Read the Following and Certify That This Curriculum Vitae Is a Current and Accurate Statement of My Professional Record
    Curriculum Vitae Notarization. I have read the following and certify that this curriculum vitae is a current and accurate statement of my professional record. Signature Date I. Personal Information I.A. UID, Last Name, First Name, Middle Name, Contact Information Novikov Sergei Petrovich, tel 3017797472 (h), 3014054836 (o), e-mail [email protected] I.B. Academic Appointments at UMD Distinguished Professor since 1997, Date of Appointment to current T/TT rank 8/17 1996 I.C. Administrative Appointments at UMD I.D. Other Employment Junior researcher in the Steklov Math Institute (Moscow) since December 1963, Senior researcher in the same Institute since December 1965 Head of Math Group at the Landau Institute for The- oretical Physics (Moscow) since January 1976 Principal researcher at the same institute since 1992 Head of Geometry/Topology group in the Steklov Math Institute since 1983 Professor at the Moscow State University since 1967 (After 1996 these affiliations are preserved as secondary for the periods of visiting Moscow) Additional Employments: Visiting professor at the Ec. Normal Superior de Paris, Laboratory of Theoretical Physisc in February 1991{August 1991; Visiting Distinguished professor at the Korean Institute for advenced studies{KIAS, Seoul, June 200, June 2001, November 2002; Visiting professor at the Maryland University at College Park in the Years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, Spring Semesters, visiting Newton International Math Institute in Cambridge, UK, Spring 2009. I.E. Educational Background Moscow State University, Mech/Math Depertment 1955-1960, University diploma issued at 1960 (Soviet equivalent of Master degree) Aspirantura (like graduate studentship) at the Steklov Math Institute 1960-1963, advisor professor M.M.Postnikov.
    [Show full text]