DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Q4 2011 Donations and Borrowing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Q4 2011 Donations and Borrowing Summary of Q1 2012 donations and borrowing Donations Table 1: Donations to all political parties over the last four quarters Quarter Donations Public funds Donations excluding public total funds Quarter one 2012 £8,858,790 £852,461 £9,711,252 Quarter four 2011 £6,935,271 £2,078,790 £9,014,061 Quarter three 2011 £10,052,396 £2,088,686 £12,141,082 Quarter two 2011 £8,724,306 £2,796,184 £11,520,490 Total £34,570,763 £7,816,121 £42,386,885 Table 2: Donations to political parties accepted in quarter one 20121 Party Donations Public funds Total excluding accepted in public funds Quarter 1 2012 British National Party £28,737 0 £28,737 Conservative and Unionist Party £4,086,097 £27,012 £4,113,109 Co-operative Party £403,747 0 £403,747 Green Party £12,500 £14,454 £26,954 Labour Party £3,452,441 £639,738 £4,092,179 Liberal Democrats £606,724 £125,822 £732,547 Plaid Cymru – The Party of Wales £58,456 £17,483 £75,939 Scottish National Party (SNP) £145,845 £27,952 £173,797 The Socialist Party of Great Britain £26,758 0 £26,758 1 All figures throughout this document are rounded to the nearest pound. In this table aggregated donations (this is where a party accepts a number of smaller donations which then add up to a reportable amount) have been redistributed to the quarter in which they were accepted, rather than the quarter in which they were reported. They therefore are not included in this table. Party Donations Public funds Total excluding accepted in public funds Quarter 1 2012 UK Independence Party (UK I P) £37,485 0 £37,485 Total £8,858,790 £852,461 £9,711,252 Table 3: Donations accepted in previous quarters and reported late in quarter one 2012 Party National Party Accounting unit Value Number Value Number British National Party £31,119 3 £2000 1 Conservative and £19,200 1 0 0 Unionist Party Co-operative Party 0 0 £7138 1 Labour Party £23,389.62 1 0 0 Liberal Democrats 0 0 £24,476 12 Total £73,708.62 5 £33,614 14 Of the 349 registered political parties, the majority submitted their returns on time or were exempt from reporting. Only five parties failed to meet the statutory deadline and this high rate of compliance by the majority of parties continues from the previous quarter. Four parties (Commonwealth National Party, Democratic Republican Party, Northumbria Party – The North East Party and UK Champagne Socialist Party) have not submitted donation and loan reports for quarter one 2012. One party (National People’s Party) has not submitted its loan report for quarter one 2012. We will contact the parties asking for an explanation, in line with our enforcement policy, as to why they have not submitted their donations and loans reports for this quarter. Public funds Four parties, the Green Party, the Labour Party, Plaid Cymru – The Party of Wales and the Scottish National Party (SNP), accepted a total of £549,361 in Short money, which the UK Parliament pays directly to opposition parties in the House of Commons. Three parties – Conservative and Unionist Party, Labour Party and Liberal Democrats – accepted a total of £143,126 in assistance paid directly to opposition parties in the Scottish Parliament. The Labour Party accepted a total of £45,821 in Cranborne money, which is paid directly to opposition party in the House of Lords. The Liberal Democrats accepted a total of £114,153 in Policy Development Grants, which are allocated according to a formula approved by the UK Parliament and distributed by the Electoral Commission. Borrowing Table 4: Total outstanding borrowing by party as at 31 March 2012 Party Loans Credit Connected facilities transaction Christian Party “Proclaiming Christ’s £200,000 £0 £0 Lordship” Conservative and Unionist Party £2,660,913 £10,161,000 £0 English Democrats Party £108,041 £0 £0 Jury Team (de-registered) £519,056 £20,000 £0 Labour Party £9,867,923 £1,793,000 £600,000 Liberal Democrats £397,270 £1,042,000 £40,000 Pensioners Party £8,436 £0 £0 Plaid Cymru – The Party of Wales £59,413 £350,000 £0 Scottish National Party (SNP) £424,503 £7,500 £0 Scottish Socialist Party £63,000 £10,000 £0 Scottish Voice £200,000 £0 £0 The People’s Party for Better Government £7,800 £0 £0 The Progressive Party £100,000 £5,000 £105,000 The Respect Party £18,417 £0 £0 UK Independence Party (UK I P) £0 £0 £0 Total £14,634,772 £13,388,500 £745,000 Table 5: New loans in quarter one 20122 Party Total amount of new loans Conservative and Unionist Party £6,947.28 Labour Party £11,900.00 Liberal Democrats £10,400.00 Total new loans £29,247.28 Table 6: Loans repaid in full or converted to donation in quarter one 20123 Party Loans converted to Loans repaid in full donations (including partial conversion) Conservative and Unionist Party £0 £20,386.64 Liberal Democrats £0 £2,100.00 Scottish National Party (SNP) £0 £30,000.00 UK Independence Party (UK I P) £0 £11,520.00 Total loans repaid £0 £64,006.64 There were no new credit facilities taken out in quarter one 2012 The Labour Party reported reducing two credit facilities by £1,139,000 in quarter one 2012. The Conservative and Unionist Party reported the end of a loan of £10,000 that should have been reported in a previous quarter. The Liberal Democrats also reported late the ending of a £3,000 loan. 2 Further details including the date on which the loan was entered into, date repayable, interest rate (whether fixed, variable or nil), whether security was given and details of the lender are available on the Electoral Commission website. 3 Changes to terms and conditions of borrowings (such as changes to interest rate and repayment or review date) must be reported to the Electoral Commission. These details are available to view on the Commission website. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NEP Manifesto 2016.Pub
    Come and join us Let’s help North East England win Manifesto 2016 Why can’t we be treated just like Scotland? Why can’t the people of North East England have one of the ‘most powerful devolved Parliaments in the world’? Why shouldn’t the North East equally enjoy high rates of UK Government funding? Just over our border, our closest neighbours, our fellow UK citizens, already benefit from a democratically elected, devolved government which has power to run its own education, health and social care services and a great deal more. The Scottish Government can plan, invest, redevelop its economy and decide its own priorities leaving only a few functions – defence, foreign policy, immigration, in the hands of the UK. With generous public finances the school children of Coldstream, Jedburgh, Dunbar are able to look forward to free Higher Education, older people in need of long term care do not have to make any financial contribution and prescriptions are free. Literally, one step to the south, if the public finances of North East England were governed by the same formula we would have more than £1billion per annum extra to spend in our region. Instead, our public services are already being decimated and are about to be utterly shredded through the removal of Government financial support and the requirement that this, the poorest, most highly Council Taxed region in England makes up the deficit through further tax rises and by taking responsibility for raising income from business rates. The grotesque unfairness of this developing situation is further emphasised by the collusion of Labour Council leaders, Labour and Conservative MPs and a few members of the North East business elite in a form of ‘devolution’ which is nothing of the sort and would be treated with derisive contempt in Edinburgh, Cardiff, or Belfast.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto 2011 SOLIDARITY with the SSP!
    Holyrood Election Manifesto 2011 SOLIDARITY WITH THE SSP! “I am very pleased to support the elderly, a good education independent campaign of the SSP in the coming of private interests, a fully funded election. health service, decent housing - these All across Europe people are finding are not unreasonable demands. But their jobs threatened, wages and now they are revolutionary. The benefits cu t and the quality of life system cannot allow them. Which reduced. The great public institutions other party, to take but one example, that have been built by past now calls for full employment? generations are now to be Scotland has a long history of dismembered, sold off, privatised. radical struggle, like the great cities Blaming the bankers is not an of England. We should show solidarity adequate response. Socialists know with those around the world who fight that it is not individual greed but the for justice, peace and the rule of law. very system itself that generates these Socialism is the heart of that. A disasters. Private corporations and strong vote for the SSP would be the banks will always put profit before best news for ordinary people people, otherwise they would not keep wherever they live. And it would be up with their competitors. brilliant for Scotland - you might find Only a party that starts from the some of us were coming to work here independent interests of working even more than we do now!” people can begin to redress the balance. A secure job, care for the - Ken Loach 2 HOLYROOD ELECTION MANIFESTO 2011 CONTENTS Pages 4&5
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Elections: 1 May 2003 14.05.03
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/46 Scottish Parliament 14 MAY 2003 Elections: 1 May 2003 This paper provides summary and detailed results of the second elections to the Scottish Parliament which took place on 1 May 2003. The paper provides data on voting trends and electoral turnout for constituencies, electoral regions and for Scotland as a whole. This paper is a companion volume to Library Research Papers 03/45 Welsh Assembly Elections and 03/44 Local Elections 2003. Matthew Leeke & Richard Cracknell SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers 03/32 Parliamentary Questions, Debate Contributions and Participation in 31.03.03 Commons Divisions 03/33 Economic Indicators [includes article: Changes to National Insurance 01.04.03 Contributions, April 2003] 03/34 The Anti-Social Behaviour Bill [Bill 83 of 2002-03] 04.04.03 03/35 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2003-04-11 10.04.03 03/36 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2003 17.04.03 03/37 Economic Indicators [includes article: The current WTO trade round] 01.05.03 03/38 NHS Foundation Trusts in the Health and Social Care 01.05.03 (Community Health and Standards) Bill [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/39 Social Care Aspects of the Health and Social Care (Community Health 02.05.03 and Standards Bill) [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/40 Social Indicators 06.05.03 03/41 The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) 06.05.03 Bill: Health aspects other than NHS Foundation Trusts [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/42 The Fire Services Bill [Bill 81 of 2002-03] 07.05.03 03/43
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons on Voting Reform from Britian's First Pr Elections
    WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW: LESSONS ON VOTING REFORM FROM BRITIAN'S FIRST PR ELECTIONS by Philip Cowley, University of Hull John Curtice, Strathclyde UniversityICREST Stephen Lochore, University of Hull Ben Seyd, The Constitution Unit April 2001 WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW: LESSONS ON VOTING REFORM FROM BRITIAN'S FIRST PR ELECTIONS Published by The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy UCL (University College London) 29/30 Tavistock Square London WClH 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ 0 The Constitution Unit. UCL 200 1 This report is sold subject ot the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First published April 2001 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ..................................................................................4 Voters' attitudes to the new electoral systems ...........................................................4 Voters' behaviour under new electoral systems ......................................................... 4 Once elected .... The effect of PR on the Scottish Parliament in Practice ..................5 Voter Attitudes to the New Electoral Systems ............................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Accounts of the Scottish Socialist Party at 31 December 2019
    Statement of Accounts of the Scottish Socialist Party at 31st December 2019 Treasurer’s Statement SSP Accounts 2019 2019 will be remembered as the year that saw a general election victory for the Tories which saw them go from a position of a hung parliament to a parliamentary majority of 80 with the Tories winning seats in traditional working class areas that previously would never have considered voting Tory, confirming Johnstone as the Tory PM with the largest majority in living memory. A Tory government which has become the norm in politics in Scotland. No matter how the working class majority in Scotland vote, there will always be a Unionist majority in Westminster. The Scottish Socialist Party have continued to campaign on our central policy of an independent socialist Scotland being our cornerstone policy which highlights that the only path for real democratic change is an independent Scotland that can challenge Scotland’s democratic deficit. Scottish independence will be democratically won by the Scottish people campaigning in our local communities, on issues that affect the daily life of working class Scotland. The SSP continues to fight austerity and campaigns for workers rights, the end of zero hour contracts and ‘£10 per hour now minimum wage’ as part of our continuing campaign for an independent socialist Scotland. James McVicar SSP National Treasurer. Income and Expenditure Account Year ended 31st December 2019 Income Membership and Subscriptions 32727 Donations 1284 Fundraising 1562 Merchandising and Sundries 291 Total income
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Devolution After the Scottish Referendum
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The future of devolution after the Scottish referendum Eleventh Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23 March 2015 HC 700 Published on 29 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Mark Durkan MP (Social Democratic & Labour Party, Foyle) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Duncan Hames MP (Liberal Democrat, Chippenham) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) David Morris MP (Conservative, Morecambe and Lunesdale) Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton Deane) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/PCRC-publications and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov Survey Results Sample Size: 1089 Adults (16+) in Scotland Fieldwork: 6th - 10th November 2020 Vote in 2019 EU Ref 2016 Indy Ref Voting intention Holyrood Voting intention Gender Age Lib Lib Lib Total Con Lab SNP Remain Leave Yes No Con Lab SNP Con Lab SNP Male Female 16-24 25-49 50-64 65+ Dem Dem Dem Weighted sample 1089 203 150 77 363 551 296 411 509 145 138 33 425 156 119 50 463 524 565 142 430 271 246 Unweighted Sample 1089 238 155 69 392 577 304 398 489 168 141 32 432 182 122 51 469 472 617 123 402 268 296 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % WESTMINSTER HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION 6-10 6-10 Westminster Voting Intention Aug Nov [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote, are under 18, don't know, or refused] Con 20 19 75 6 15 0 8 44 5 31 100 0 0 0 90 5 14 1 23 14 12 10 22 31 Lab 16 17 11 60 24 4 20 11 5 27 0 100 0 0 4 89 9 4 15 19 18 15 17 20 Lib Dem 5 4 1 4 46 0 7 1 0 9 0 0 100 0 1 2 69 0 5 4 3 6 1 7 SNP 54 53 3 25 10 94 60 36 84 27 0 0 0 100 1 2 5 93 46 60 50 61 55 40 Green 2 3 0 4 5 1 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 3 7 3 3 0 Brexit Party 2 3 10 1 0 0 1 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 1 9 2 1 2 Other 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 HOLYROOD HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION Holyrood Headline Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] Con 20 19 75 7 13 0 10 44 5 33 87 4 2 0 100 0 0 0 24 14 13 11 20 33 Lab 14 15 11 53 19 3 17 9 5 22 4 80 8 1 0 100 0 0 13 16 17 13 14 18 Lib Dem 6 6 4 6 47 1 8 4 1 11 4 3 90 1 0 0 100 0 7 6 4 6 4 10 SNP 57 56 5
    [Show full text]
  • CEÜCIC LEAGUE COMMEEYS CELTIAGH Danmhairceach Agus an Rùnaire No A' Bhan- Ritnaire Aige, a Dhol Limcheall Air an Roinn I R ^ » Eòrpa Air Sgath Nan Cànain Bheaga
    No. 105 Spring 1999 £2.00 • Gaelic in the Scottish Parliament • Diwan Pressing on • The Challenge of the Assembly for Wales • League Secretary General in South Armagh • Matearn? Drew Manmn Hedna? • Building Inter-Celtic Links - An Opportunity through Sport for Mannin ALBA: C O M U N N B r e i z h CEILTEACH • BREIZH: KEVRE KELTIEK • CYMRU: UNDEB CELTAIDD • EIRE: CONRADH CEILTEACH • KERNOW: KESUNYANS KELTEK • MANNIN: CEÜCIC LEAGUE COMMEEYS CELTIAGH Danmhairceach agus an rùnaire no a' bhan- ritnaire aige, a dhol limcheall air an Roinn i r ^ » Eòrpa air sgath nan cànain bheaga... Chunnaic sibh iomadh uair agus bha sibh scachd sgith dhen Phàrlamaid agus cr 1 3 a sliopadh sibh a-mach gu aighcaraeh air lorg obair sna cuirtean-lagha. Chan eil neach i____ ____ ii nas freagarraiche na sibh p-fhèin feadh Dainmheag uile gu leir! “Ach an aontaich luchd na Pàrlamaid?” “Aontaichidh iad, gun teagamh... nach Hans Skaggemk, do chord iad an òraid agaibh mu cor na cànain againn ann an Schleswig-Holstein! Abair gun robh Hans lan de Ball Vàidaojaid dh’aoibhneas. Dhèanadh a dhicheall air sgath nan cànain beaga san Roinn Eòrpa direach mar a rinn e airson na Daineis ann atha airchoireiginn, fhuair Rinn Skagerrak a dhicheall a an Schieswig-I lolstein! Skaggerak ]¡l¡r ori dio-uglm ami an mhinicheadh nach robh e ach na neo-ncach “Ach tha an obair seo ro chunnartach," LSchlesvvig-Molstein. De thuirt e sa Phàrlamaid. Ach cha do thuig a cho- arsa bodach na Pàrlamaid gu trom- innte ach:- ogha idir. chridheach. “Posda?” arsa esan.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership
    General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership Firearms UK is an Association campaigning for the protection of firearms ownership within the UK. Primary objectives are to encourage unity and positive action within the shooting community and to promote and defend individual firearms ownership and the shooting sports. In the lead up to the 2015 General Election we canvased the parliamentary candidates for their views on shooting sports and firearms ownership. We sent an email questionnaire asking seven questions; 1. Do you believe in a total ban on private firearms ownership? 2. Do you believe that private firearms ownership should face greater restrictions? 3. Do you believe the current system is balanced/there is no need for change? 4. Do you support all forms of currently legal shooting in the UK? (If there are exceptions please state) 5. Would you oppose any moves to further restrict private firearms ownership/use in the UK? 6. Do you believe that our firearms laws are in need of reformation and sensible relaxation? 7. If you support UK citizen’s rights to participate in shooting sports do you also support changing the law to permit .22 rimfire pistols to be used for competitive shooting thus allowing ordinary UK citizens to properly train to enable them to compete in international events such as the Olympic and Commonwealth games? We obtained a database of candidate’s details from www.yournextmp.com. The database contained email addresses for 3361 of the 3969 candidates listed. Unfortunately, 183 of these email addresses were incorrect. We managed to correct some of these and sent a follow up email to the candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • From Social Democracy Back to No Ideology? - the Scottish National Party and Ideological Change in a Multi-Level Electoral Setting
    From Social Democracy back to No Ideology? - The Scottish National Party and Ideological Change in a Multi-level Electoral Setting Peter Lynch Accepted for publication in Regional & Federal Studies published by Taylor and Francis Introduction Nationalist and regionalist parties have often been characterised as ideologically heterogeneous (Hix and Lord, 1997; De Winter and Türsan, 1998). This situation makes regionalist parties difficult to classify in conventional left-right terms though viewing these parties as an ideological family is to misunderstand their role and significance. Ideological profile can be understood as a secondary characteristic of regionalist parties, as opposed to their primary characteristic of support for self- government – the core business of autonomy (De Winter, 1998, 208-9): which in itself contains a variety of constitutional options to reorganise the territorial distribution of power within a state (Rokkan and Urwin, 1983). However, though ideological positioning may be a secondary characteristic, most regionalist parties have adopted an ideology – in the SNP’s case social democracy. As will be explained below, the reasons for adopting an ideology in itself, in addition to a particular ideology, are complex. For the SNP, the ideological position of elites, the policy preferences of the party’s membership and the adoption of an electoral strategy to challenge a dominant political party in the region (Labour) were all influential. The adoption of an ideological position was not always uncontroversial but became easier due to party system change (the electoral decline of the Conservatives in Scotland from the 1960s), as the SNP came to focus much of its attention on Labour as its primary competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEVOLVED PARTY SYSTEMS of the UNITED KINGDOM Sub-National Variations from the National Model
    PARTY POLITICS VOL 11. No.6 pp. 654–673 Copyright © 2005 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi www.sagepublications.com THE DEVOLVED PARTY SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM Sub-national Variations from the National Model Robert E. Bohrer II and Glen S. Krutz ABSTRACT In this article we examine the emerging party systems of the devolved environments, with an eye toward shedding light on the factors that influence the number of parties in a system where parties are already mobilized but the institutional context is new. Our findings demonstrate that electoral rules have an independent effect on the number of parties. More specifically, the use of proportional representation has increased the number of parties. In addition, two social cleavage structure factors appear to affect the design of the party system: class and center– periphery. All of these forces lead to a more complex governing arrange- ment in the devolved settings than that of the United Kingdom. KEY WORDS Ⅲ cleavages Ⅲ devolution Ⅲ mixed-member proportional representa- tion Ⅲ plurality Introduction The end of the twentieth century marked a shift in the political structure of the United Kingdom (UK). In the summer of 1999, the Scottish Parliament convened for the first time in nearly 300 years, while similar institutions opened in Wales and Northern Ireland. While emanating from Westminster, the devolved institutions varied a great deal from both the British model of parliament as well as from one another, though all three continued to remain subject, to varying extents, to the functioning of the British system. The advent of sub-national government in the UK offers numerous oppor- tunities for studying the effects of varying types of institutions, the expan- sion of issue agendas and the dynamics of multi-level governance.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARTIST for Democratic Socialism #309 March/April 2021 £2 Doctor Death
    CHARTIST For democratic socialism #309 March/April 2021 £2 Doctor Death Peter Kenyon STARMER CHALLENGE Gary Younge US ELECTIONS Alice Arkwright Bryn Jones Steven Walker COVID FALL-OUT Mary Southcott FEMINISM Mark Serwotka ELECTORAL REFORM Don Flynn RACISM Plus Book reviews and regulars ISSN - 0968 7866 ISSUE 09 www.chartist.org.uk Contributions and letters deadline for Editorial Policy CHARTIST #310 The editorial policy of CHARTIST is to promote debate amongst people active in 10 April 2021 radical politics about the contemporary Chartist welcomes articles of 800 or 1500 words, and relevance of democratic socialism across letters in electronic format only to: [email protected] the spectrum of politics, economics, science, philosophy, art, interpersonal Receive Chartist’s online newsletter: send your email address to [email protected] relations – in short, the whole realm of social life. Chartist Advert Rates: Our concern is with both democracy and socialism. The history of the last century Inside Full page £200; 1/2 page £125; 1/4 page £75; 1/8 page £40; 1/16 page £25; small box 5x2cm £15 single has made it abundantly clear that the sheet insert £50 mass of the population of the advanced We are also interested in advert swaps with other publications. To place an advert, please email: capitalist countries will have no interest [email protected] in any form of socialism which is not thoroughly democratic in its principles, its practices, its morality and its ideals. Yet the consequences of this deep attach - ment to democracy – one of the greatest advances of our epoch – are seldom reflected in the discussion and debates Editorial Board Contacts amongst active socialists.
    [Show full text]