Pearl Millet Package
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Integrated Pest Management of the Mexican Rice Borer in Louisiana and Texas Sugarcane and Rice Francis P
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Integrated pest management of the Mexican rice borer in Louisiana and Texas sugarcane and rice Francis P. F. Reay-Jones Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Reay-Jones, Francis P. F., "Integrated pest management of the Mexican rice borer in Louisiana and Texas sugarcane and rice" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 761. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/761 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT OF THE MEXICAN RICE BORER IN LOUISIANA AND TEXAS SUGARCANE AND RICE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the formal requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Francis P. F. Reay-Jones B.S., Université Bordeaux 1, 1999 M.S., Université d’Angers/Institut National d’Horticulture, 2001 August 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Thomas E. Reagan, for his guidance, motivation, and also for introducing me with great enthusiasm to LSU football and Cajun cuisine. I would like to express my appreciation to my graduate committee, Drs. Benjamin L Legendre, E. -
What We Have Learned About the Bermudagrass Stem Maggot
WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT THE BERMUDAGRASS STEM MAGGOT D.W. Hancock, W.G. Hudson, L.L. Baxter, and J.T. McCullers1 Abstract Since first being discovered in southern Georgia in July 2010, the bermudagrass stem maggot (BSM; Atherigona reversura Villeneuve) has infested and damaged forage bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) throughout the southeastern United States. Our objectives for this presentation were to summarize the available literature on this new, invasive species and provide additional insight from what is currently known about other Atherigona spp. The BSM, along with other Atherigona spp., are small, muscid flies native to Central and Southeast Asia. The adult fly of the BSM lays its eggs on bermudagrass leaves. Upon hatching, the BSM larva slips into the sheath, down the tiller, and penetrates the pseudostem at the first node. The BSM larva then feeds on the vascular tissue, sap, and (potentially) the subsequent decaying plant material before exiting the tiller, pupating in the soil, and emerging as a fly. As a result of the larval feeding, bermudagrass exhibits senescence and necrosis of the terminal leaves on the affected shoots. The affected leaves are easily pulled out of the sheath and show obvious damage near the affected node. In severe infestations, over 80% of the tillers in a given area may be affected. There is a paucity of information about the lifecycle of A. reversura and how it can be managed or controlled, but some information is available on basic larva behavior, fly physiology, and the potential differences in resistance among some bermudagrass varieties. Additional research is underway to better understand the lifecycle of this species, confirm and quantify the degree of preference A. -
AR TICLE Recommended Names for Pleomorphic Genera In
IMA FUNGUS · 6(2): 507–523 (2015) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.14 Recommended names for pleomorphic genera in Dothideomycetes ARTICLE Amy Y. Rossman1, Pedro W. Crous2,3, Kevin D. Hyde4,5, David L. Hawksworth6,7,8, André Aptroot9, Jose L. Bezerra10, Jayarama D. Bhat11, Eric Boehm12, Uwe Braun13, Saranyaphat Boonmee4,5, Erio Camporesi14, Putarak Chomnunti4,5, Dong-Qin Dai4,5, Melvina J. D’souza4,5, Asha Dissanayake4,5,15, E.B. Gareth Jones16, Johannes Z. Groenewald2, Margarita Hernández-Restrepo2,3, Sinang Hongsanan4,5, Walter M. Jaklitsch17, Ruvishika Jayawardena4,5,12, Li Wen Jing4,5, Paul M. Kirk18, James D. Lawrey19, Ausana Mapook4,5, Eric H.C. McKenzie20, Jutamart Monkai4,5, Alan J.L. Phillips21, Rungtiwa Phookamsak4,5, Huzefa A. Raja22, Keith A. Seifert23, Indunil Senanayake4,5, Bernard Slippers3, Satinee Suetrong24, Kazuaki Tanaka25, Joanne E. Taylor26, Kasun M. Thambugala4,5,27, Qing Tian4,5, Saowaluck Tibpromma4,5, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe4,5,12, Nalin N. Wijayawardene4,5, Saowanee Wikee4,5, Joyce H.C. Woudenberg2, Hai-Xia Wu28,29, Jiye Yan12, Tao Yang2,30, Ying Zhang31 1Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA; corresponding author e-mail: amydianer@ yahoo.com 2CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 3Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa 4Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, School of Science, Mae Fah -
Genomic Designing of Pearl Millet: a Resilient Crop for Arid and Semi-Arid Environments
Chapter 6 Genomic Designing of Pearl Millet: A Resilient Crop for Arid and Semi-arid Environments Desalegn D. Serba, Rattan S. Yadav, Rajeev K. Varshney, S. K. Gupta, Govindaraj Mahalingam, Rakesh K. Srivastava, Rajeev Gupta, Ramasamy Perumal and Tesfaye T. Tesso Abstract Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.; Syn. Cenchrus ameri- canus (L.) Morrone] is the sixth most important cereal in the world. Today, pearl millet is grown on more than 30 million ha mainly in West and Central Africa and the Indian sub-continent as a staple food for more than 90 million people in agri- culturally marginal areas. It is rich in proteins and minerals and has numerous health benefits such as being gluten-free and having slow-digesting starch. It is grown as a forage crop in temperate areas. It is drought and heat tolerant, and a climate-smart crop that can withstand unpredictable variability in climate. However, research on pearl millet improvement is lagging behind other major cereals mainly due to limited investment in terms of man and money power. So far breeding achievements include the development of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), maintenance counterparts (rf) system and nuclear fertility restoration genes (Rf) for hybrid breeding, dwarfing genes for reduced height, improved input responsive- ness, photoperiod neutrality for short growing season, and resistance to important diseases. Further improvement of pearl millet for genetic yield potential, stress tolerance, and nutritional quality traits would enhance food and nutrition security for people living in agriculturally dissolute environments. Application of molecular technology in the pearl millet breeding program has a promise in enhancing the selection efficiency while shortening the lengthy phenotypic selection process D. -
Species of Atherigona in Andhra Pradesh
5)PANS 2314): 379 383 Crown copyright, 1977 Species of Atherigona in Andhra Pradesh K. V. Seshu Reddy and J. C. Davies ICRISA T, 1- 11-256 Begurnper, Hyderabad, India. Summary. Records of Arhengona spp, bred from cultlvdted cereals. mtnor m~lletsand wild grass hosts ere glven. A Iota1 01 19 plant hosts of Arherrgona specter IS Ilrted. A. soccata, sorghum shootfly, was by far the commonest spocles present on sorghum and ~t was alw r~ordedfrom malze, pearl m~llet,Echinochloa colonurn. Errochlos procera, Cyrnbopogon sp, and Paspalurn scrobicularum. Numbers of A. roccara bred from grasses were very low. Data showed that specles of Arhe~gonawere In general highly specific In choice of plant host A. lalcafa wds the commonest qrass l~vlng species, but tended to favour Echinochlm colonurn and E. crusgsll~.The dom~nant specter on pearl millet was A. appmximara, on Panicum ps~lopodium,A. pulla and on Digiraria adscendens, A. oryzae. An lnlerertlng dnd important record was the recovery of A. eriochloae from both sorghum and Er~ochloaprocara. Th~srprclcs was prev~ouslyonly known from the peratype descr~bedIn 1926. Other specles were bred from a range of host grasses. Introduction The sorghum shootfly, Atherigonasoccaa Rond., is well known as a serlous pest of sorghum in lndia (Jotwani eral., 1970). It is also a widely distributed and occas~onallydamaglng pest in Africa (Swa~neand Wyatt, 1954; Langham, 1968; Deeming, 1971). Control of the fly has been achieved uslng systemlc ~nsecticides(Jotwani and Sukhanl, 1968; Thobbietal., 1968; Barry, 1972). There have. however, been several reports of only part~alsuccess in controlling the fly with contact insect~cides(Swalne and Wyatt, 1954; Wheatley, 1961) or failure to control tt (Ingram, 1959). -
Lecture No 3 PESTS of SORGHUM, PEARL MILLET and FINGER MILLET
Lecture No 3 PESTS OF SORGHUM, PEARL MILLET AND FINGER MILLET I. PESTS OF SORGHUM More than 150 species of insects have been reported to damage sorghum. However over a dozen species are very serious and constitute a major constraint in sorghum production. Shoot fly, stem borers, shoot and ear head bug and aphids are serious pests that bring reduction in the yield. Major pests 1. Sorghum Shootfly Atherigona soccata Muscidae Diptera 2. Stem borer Chilo partellus Crambidae Lepidoptera 3. Pink stem borer Sesamia inferens Noctuidae Lepidoptera 4 Shoot bug Peregrinus maidis Delphacidae Hemiptera 5. Earhead bug Calocoris angustatus Miridae Hemiptera 6. Sorghum midge Contarinia sorghicola Cecidomyiidae Diptera Rhopalosiphum maidis, 7. Plant lice (Aphids) Aphididae Hemiptera Melanaphis sacchari Minor Pests 8. Earhead web worm Cryptoblabes gnidiella Pyraustidae Lepidoptera 9. Gram caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera Noctuidae Lepidoptera 10. Plant bug Dolycoris indicus Pentatomidae Hemiptera 11. Stink bug Nezara viridula Pentatomidae Hemiptera 12. Mirid bug Creontiades pallidifer Miridae Hemiptera 13. Slug caterpillar Thosea apierens Cochlididae Lepidoptera 14. Leaf roller Marasmia trapezalis Pyralidae Lepidoptera Cryptocephalus 15. Flea beetle schestedii, Monolepta Chrysomelidae Coleoptera signata Red hairy Amsacta albistriga, 16. Arctiidae Lepidoptera caterpillar A. moorei 17. Semilooper Eublemma silicula Noctuidae Lepidoptera Myllocerus maculosus 18. Weevils Curculionidae Coleoptera M. discolor,M. subfaciatus Wingless 19. Colemania sphenaroides Acrididae Orthoptera grasshopper MAJOR PESTS 1.Sorghum Shootfly: Atherigona soccata (Muscidae: Diptera) Distribution and status Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka Host range: Maize, ragi, bajra, rice, wheat and grasses Damage symptoms The maggot on hatching migrates to the upper surface of leaf and enters between the leaf sheath and stem. -
TEF: Post-Harvest Operations
TEF Post-harvest Operations - Post-harvest Compendium TEF: Post-harvest Operations Organization: Institute of Agricultural Research Organization, Holetta Agricultural Research Center (IARO) Author: Alemayehu Refera Edited by AGSI/FAO: Danilo Mejia (Technical), Beverly Lewis (Language & Style) Last reviewed: 14/05/2001 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Economic and Social Impact of Tef ............................................................................. 7 1.2 World Trade ................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Primary Product .......................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Secondary & Derived Products .................................................................................. 10 1.5 Consumer Preference ................................................................................................. 28 2. Post-Production Operations .............................................................................................. 30 2.1 Harvesting .................................................................................................................. 30 2.2 Threshing ................................................................................................................... -
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results .............................................................................................................. -
Volumen Completo 31-2
ISSN-2007-8080 REVISTA MEXICANA DE FITOPATOLOGÍA MEXICAN JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY VOLUMEN 31 NÚMERO 2, 2013 Órgano Internacional de Difusión de la Socied ad Mexicana de Fito patología, A.C. La Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología (ISSN-2007-8080) está incluida en ISI-Thomson Scientific Master Journal List, REDALYC, LATINDEX, AGRIS, BIOSIS, PERIODICA, Review of Plant Pathology en Índice de Revistas Mexicanas de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica del CONACyT. Politica Editorial La Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología (RMF) es una revista internacional que se publica semestralmente por la Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología, A.C. (SMF). Se distribuye a 61 bibliotecas dentro de México y 93 más en 57 países. Publica artículos de investigación original concernientes aspectos básicos y aplicados de fitopatología. Se incluyen tópicos generales relacionados con estudios de protección vegetal, así como de hongos, bacterias virus y nematodos fitopatógenos. Artículos de revisión, notas fitopatológicas, descripción de variedades y cartas al editor, también pueden someterse para su publicación. Todos los manuscritos se deben preparar en español o en inglés y enviarse al Editor en Jefe. La guía para autores se encuentra en la página de la SMF (www.socmexfito.org) y aparecerá en el primer número de cada volumen. La comunicación será exclusivamente a través del autor para correspondencia. Para su publicación, los escritos deberán ser revisados y aprobados por árbitros y editores especializados. Los trabajos publicados aparecerán en español e inglés, de lo cual el costo editorial incluirá la traducción total mas $1000 pesos por manuscrito. La subscripción anual de la RMF es de $600 pesos individual y de $1,000 pesos para compañía, biblioteca o institución; para extranjeros es de US$60 individual y US$100 para compañía, biblioteca o institución. -
Assessment of Grain Yield Losses in Pearl Millet Due to the Millet Stemborer, Coniesta Ignefusalis (Hampson)
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2003 ASSESSMENT OF GRAIN YIELD LOSSES IN PEARL MILLET DUE TO THE MILLET STEMBORER, CONIESTA IGNEFUSALIS (HAMPSON) Aissetou Drame-Yaye Université Abdou Moumouni Ousmane Youm University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Jonathan N. Ayertey University of Ghana Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Drame-Yaye, Aissetou; Youm, Ousmane; and Ayertey, Jonathan N., "ASSESSMENT OF GRAIN YIELD LOSSES IN PEARL MILLET DUE TO THE MILLET STEMBORER, CONIESTA IGNEFUSALIS (HAMPSON)" (2003). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 328. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/328 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Insect Sci. Applic. Vol. 23, No. 3,Coniesta pp. 259–265, ignefusalis 2003 larval establishment and damage 0191-9040/03 $3.00 + 0.00 259 Printed in Kenya. All rights reserved © 2003 ICIPE ASSESSMENT OF GRAIN YIELD LOSSES IN PEARL MILLET DUE TO THE MILLET STEMBORER, CONIESTA IGNEFUSALIS (HAMPSON) AISSETOU DRAME-YAYE1, OUSMANE YOUM2 AND JONATHAN N. AYERTEY3 1Faculté d’Agronomie, Université Abdou Moumouni , BP 12040 Niamey, Niger; 2 ICRISAT Sahelian Centre, BP 12404, Niamey, Niger; 3 Department of Crop Science, University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG 44, Legon Accra, Ghana (Accepted 4 June 2003) Abstract—Studies were conducted at the ICRISAT Sahelian Centre, Niger, to assess damage and yield loss by the millet stemborer, Coniesta ignefusalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. -
OOOO 0086 Promotor:Dr .J.D E Wilde,Hoogleraa R Inhe T Dierkundig Deelva Nd E Planteziektenkunde
ECOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF AESTIVATION-DIAPAUSE IN THE LARVAE OF TWO PYRALID STALK BORERS OF MAIZE IN KENYA in mi •»> ••• - OOOO 0086 promotor:dr .J.d e Wilde,hoogleraa r inhe t dierkundig deelva nd e planteziektenkunde. Inn $z.o /i 3.si P. SCHELTES Ecological and physiological aspects of aestivation-diapause in the larvae of two Pyralid stalk borers of maize in Kenya Proefschrift terverkrijgin g van de graad van doctor ind e landbouwwetenschappen, op gezag vand e rector magnificus, dr.H.C.va n der Plas, hoogleraar in de organische scheikunde, inhe t openbaar te verdedigen opwoensda g 6 September 1978 des namiddags tevie r uur ind e aula van deLandbouwhogeschoo l teWageningen . BIBLIOTHCE* vv'-' ••-••>\GEIV ah iwi$6-os MhJZlot 7%/ STEU.TNCEN I Doord egrot everscheidenhei d ind eaar dva nd eperiodiek erusttoestan dva n insektene nd emechanisme ndi ehieraa ntengrondsla g liggeni selk eklassifikati e vand erusttoestand ,gebaseer d opextern eekologisch efaktore n (tliiller)o fo p internefysiologisch everanderinge nbinne nhe tinsek t (Mansingh)gebrekki ge n daardoorbetrekkelij kzinloos . MilllerH.J . (1970)Nov aAct aLeopoldin a35 ,1-27 . MansinghA . (1971)Can .Ent .103 ,983-1009 . Ditproefschrift . II Hetverdwijne nva nd ekutikulair epigmentati eal skriteriu mvoo rd ediapauz e dientme tvoorzichtighei d teworde ngehanteerd . Ditproefschrift . Ill Konklusiesal sdi eva nHiran obetreffend ed elarval egroe iva n Chilo suppressalis end e<irooagewich tbestanddele nva nhe tdoo rdez erijststengelboorde rgenuttigd e voedsel zijnaanvechtbaar . HiranoC . (1964)Bull .Nat .Inst .Agr .Sci. ,Ser .C , no.17 . Ditproefschrift . IV Dekonklusi eva nChippendal ee nRedd yda td eindukti eva ndiapauz e ind e "southwestern cornborer " Diatraea grandiosella een"extremel ytemperature - dependentprocess "is ,waarbi jfotoperiod eee nondergeschikt ero lspeelt ,berus t oponvoldoend egegevens . -
Coniesta Ignefusalis
Coniesta ignefusalis: a Handbook of Information Information Bulletin no. 46 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Abstract Citation: Youm, 0., Harris, K.M., and Nwan'ze,K.F. 1996. Coniesta ignefusalis (Hom. pson), the millet stem borer: a handbook of information. (In En. Summaries in En, Fr, Es.) Information Bulletin no. 46. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: Interna tional Crops Research Institute for theSemi-Arid Tropics. 60 pp. [Part1: Review pp. 1 18; Part·2: Annotated bibliography pp. 19-52] ISBN 92-9066-253-0. Order code: IBE 046. A comprehensive review of the biology and management of Coniesta ignefusalis (Ham pson), the millet stem borer, is presented in this· two-part bulletin. The information is categorized under pest status and crop loss assessment, taxonomic descriptions, pest biology and ecology. Pest manage!!lent practices including cultural, plant resistance, biological, legislative, chemical, and integrated methods are discussed. Part 2 contains an annotated bibliography ofnearly 150 references published between 1950 and1994. Resume Coniesta ignefusalis (Hampson), Ie foreur du mil:un manuel d'informations. La recherche sur la biologie de Coniesta ignefusalis, Ie foreur du mil, ainsi que sur les methodes de lutte contre l'insecte sont passees en revue dans cette publication adeux parties. L'infor mation est regroupee sous diversesrubriques: importance du ravageur et estimation de la perte des cultures, descriptions taxonomiques, biologie et ecologie de l'insecte. La gammes des methodes de lutte culturale, biologique, legislative, chimique et integrees ainsi· que la resistance des pIantes y est egalement exposee. La deuxieme partie du document comprend une bibliographie annotee de pres de 150 references publiees entre 1950 et 1994.