DOCSLIB.ORG

On·. Tlie .Sërbiat.T. Natioq~D Pr~Gram :Whic.H· Was The· Màin Trigger. for the War in the Ror.Mer Yqg~$L~Via

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On·. Tlie .Sërbiat.T. Natioq~D Pr~Gram :Whic.H· Was The· Màin Trigger. for the War in the Ror.Mer Yqg~$L~Via • • • '•: '·;ti IJ~ .;: ,·· STÀTÉMENT OF'SONJA BISERKO. 1~ l'pftQ..dUtJtiOU. t.. 1 h~ve.-,bëèri. ~Md Q:Ythe 'Croafîan;Jegal'l~am t~ provide fJ. stat~ment which will be~ t:ight 'on·. tlie .Sërbiat.t. natioq~d pr~gram :whic.h· was the· màin trigger. for the war in the ror.mer Yqg~$l~via. , 9 ..,.. "\'"~ a·nc,~ P.resld,~nt of the Helsinlci Committee for Human Rights in 2. D~fining the Problèm in Ristork-al P.ers.pective 3. 'Dèvel.opment of Serl:i ·people and .th~ir ·state during the past two centuries hàs. been murk~d ~Y a 1/l.~i.mtl'ict hetween palfriai:chy and modernity which has s1o.wed and mad~ the cultu.ràl inte&rQtlan :of Ser~s ~d·creation of a "cÇ>mplete statet' more difficult. 1 The clash be.tweeo pattiaréhy tn1d med.ernity m.iltked. t:he ~nd o.f the 40lh century, taregeJy becausb e:mat:~cip.att~.r\ ·wa~ ahv~ys. p,é.tcëjved àS à loss of identity. the f.oregoing; .r.~ulted in a: rëvtv.a:l of a. "gre.ater Sertii~'; çpnc!:!pt Wfiich drew its strengtli from the patrîarcbaJ~. êalie~tiv.fst'l.'no:clèJ .af stat~ and sQeiety nod ethniç-religious understand.ing. ef nation. Tliat- t;0n'c~P.t d:reW- ~ditlprial strëJ]gth from thé reliance on tradition o-f. the me'dleval Serh ·emph:~. 4·, In tke· j~dgemént of Ser.b nationalists, the ·historhml climax presented the greater~ Ser.bian ~tate iqea.and· its.ndv9cà~~s:with a singula.r opportunity to cnpita.Jize on th~ brea~:­ up ê·(Y.ü$Qslavia aod red~:aw th~ bot~ders according to a national programme near[y two e~n,UJ,l'Ïës: old~. Thé Sera elite based its àï'IJbitions o~ severa! very impli'rtant· premises: the 1 tl1nr t!!nn· was coined by· Zor~l) bjirijdjic. ·amblemntic· of th!tt ideu is his b1Udy "Yugosla.vitt ns nn Unfîn'l!lhc<rStatel" nnd.Ne~ad Ï)Jinittîjevi~'s·.èssey "Serbln as an Untinishcd Statc." 2 A ~~W ~cr.bia st~~J:. n:iJ~oY.çd lo. satnhwest, wlille. 'lt~lwing. a p<trt of ~ô~ovo l:iehlnd; mâ~e~.. tlie.s~m· ançl ~t,Jbstpt;l~è qtihp SO\oQ!lllcXl.Jiiitionitl·pfilgratn. 'TJïe foUowliJg·.qlli.Jte prbbaply b.est Hlt.jstrate!l th~ idan. "This· ls th~~~~~·~~t~rtltofhit~t.bni.c'ar.r.esliûfllê of the entire Balkan region, !Ile tiinc of for.ced adjus.tment we shall llav~ '(q.accaP,t: as n fu<it of'Ufe .. Epoahal ciltJI.nf.:rëS IJI*-e ·it nece$1lney fur the Ser-bian people w çonwe.gaté in tllé:tenitocy.itèaït.livè, tt can. êpVèr·~y ils ciyUI~ti~n ttnd wherefi·om il will be e11emy to no one, Ev.en this. dishstet·b~il'tg$ ·wnh sè:ltnê~ing. usëful- èi.bnicill iljipea)!cntt~:nt çfthe regit;m. Th~ Sètbian people unifies and. ·lfoniqg~nb::e.Sdt· tbllnd~·tl~·i'ts·mr:ing·fïpf!.® tha(gcts etf!nic. borders. A çhange as suçh<implîGs.estnblisment: ef.n.itëW nntitsn smtë. m. tb~ t~rrltory o1~ly a.ggr~sor:s may cali înto <Juestlo11, ln other words, we are forç~:d to ~j:ça.tê··q .state ~Uit~d t!!i us and· to· aur I?QWer." (,bobricn Cosic, "Chaslng the·Wind; ") 1.: •': :· ,If!~ ' .1 intel.'natimial env.immnent or vacuum which em·er.ged 'lS: a: r~.$.U:It .uf d~!} Q~I,I~p.~~ o'f comilluni.sm, Serbian supretnaéy o.\1e'r the Yùgo&lav Peapieis Arti1y", th;e Kos.pvo.,nl)'tll·f wi1Jeh mobili:z~d Serbs, and perçeptions of R,ussia. as Serl;iia's Jiatüràl a!Jy,. 5; The ·serb national programme was not unique in the.Bâlkans. Balkan nat(QtJii .thj:~.t..J:t.aYfl. live'd on the periphery of two lnrg{;ï et'npires for centttri&s '~ère :àlso:t1atir.ishin$J···iui.1ional aspirations :-and. llad nation stàtes' as th~ ir goals. The tainet~e11tl1··.~ridA:he··~~gUt~ù.t~g ofitljé twenti~t_h oenturi:és saw the ir. w~n'lM)f Iiberati.on ..àild til~ir ëffottid~ buïNLmo.de.rrtst~tes P.f tlie'ir own. The creatioM af Yugoslnvia in 1918 laid· ~he 'faunciatfon. f(it' thè rèaltzatihn· t)f. the' .Set·b· national prograhl. aut. at the "S!l01~ tin1è.. the i11.WV Yu.gQ,l;lav. .stiï,të.·ëm~~çlied· abJ:eetively dispàrate national interests and éonimdn so.utldNav ~J?ii:atîon~. ij:v.en.:a:;~· ·~hç· O.ew state· was b~ing. built. 1he proponetUS of UIÛtattiariÏsm ·artd ·j~detalism <llashed. I'heir eonflict ihevitably raîsed questions about the $~1rvïvàli 9f,tlî~ Yug~$làv state. T:li,:i Sèrbs1. who w.anted to become the leac:ling nation in YugQslavia and: the Bal~Jl'~t' had .~lw.~y~ been ~trang. They be.Iieved tl:tat they ough~ to be· giVën a: v.anguarU rote. in the B.~lkan Bntente! the collective defence agreement designed. to di.scq~rage .tite con's~~1t ·ter.tito.d.ni claims 'Of\laric:ius European ·countries. 6; The adeption of the 1'974 Yl.!goslavian Con.st.itutlon \:\las nr~9J~~ed tlf éxfètis·jVêJ;îtJl>Üc de~ate throùgltO.~I~ ~hê coLlntry. At the time,. tlu:ire:wasdi,h:e·;;~(!r· di~a~(~ta~ti.en:' h1 $Çr~.i~ with the direction ln which the changes ·we'r.e di;lftih:g· S'e't.b'ia'n elites lookë~;' iîp.on the ·confedetadon ofYugosl~JVÏll as a plot to cqmp,letely brÇ~k.... iip .the Set'Qp~~p!e:âtid'àJigued. _ _______________ Serllia1s beu.11daries at the time were 'neither untiona!' n·or.hî$tprleal.1:>0J:çl~l's1 :l:)nd:th~t, -~~==-~=~=-=-==~rol"~tl1at-lnati~~=tl16-'Güt1nl:laries--&_~ween ~~=i~~ii~r~~=-~~<fi~~~ailii~i~i=ffitW.~~Nt-tù·~f.iii~ri::.:·:::_ .. :.•.=·~· :_::::=.==- --------····- ---------·--------,-----~----~--~ ---·~-------·-- poU.tical' 1. Th~ Serbs' largely traumatic and frustraLing ex.petient;;ë With the 1914· CanstlttJUon exerted considerable influence on their late.r behav.iol:lr d1,1rit1g the disi.otegeation of 3'Thc.Bnttlll< of Kosovo topk. P. Ince in 1j 8'), nod mar~ed the lie-ghmiog of,thp ;i.·ceo~"'ry:QUemari ..sqprèinacy. Hàwë\icr;.Scrbs hav.e bëen gloryfing this hÇavy:·detènt ever.~inçe; Tlu:;.defui\t h~$ ~eêiùirilieifinto: marty.rijon:~t while Kosovo itself proclaimed "thç saut Qflbe Serbian·.n~t~on.:'i ;Ac~~rdîQgf~; iv.ithoüi:l{ôsov.o, $.èrbs will be wiP.cd o~t as .amith:m. This is wh y "ihe· Kosovo rilytii" i'inplic:S contin'uity .wfth ·tlie·.iiïëdicv.al Serbiiin !ll'nte. · 2 '.1 ,,, • ·,r,.·'·ifr·· ''!';'i1llir"'\~~1''1firJiill!~i!)k: , ... : Yugoslav1a. Mbst Serbs · bëlièVë 'tliat the Constiluti<im desti'Oy.ed the unit~ 9f Serbia, Qrougllt abÇJJJt'~,e~;~,res qfpr~fi;Iem.S for it a,nd (ed to the breâk-up ofYugosla.via, Most Setbs ar.e. deeply· convinc~d ·thW; the QOfl$tltutiQu~l tt•ansformation of' the r~publics into statës rêndeted a s~tisfaêtoey salution to the Serb national question even more remote. Having .dècia~d that tl)e {974 Conâtituti~n:l;riatked the besinalng efthe end of'YugQs1a..v1a as they. saw it:(te~ as an e~tènd~d S~rbi'à..), S~rbian community and opinion leaders set about --l-----·revivilig:.tlïe-;K;oso'Vo:m~th. Tltifnn~tks~rvedi;o-ra:lly-and-œhere-Serbs-politically;:-j,ùst·as·------·~-­ it did ~t the b~ginn;iilg orthe. oineteï::hth eetitury. 3.. S.ef.bs Mobilizc.d· Over thé National Program:me 8. 't'he AI.PatlÎan. d~!Donstra:tions·in K9~ovo tn 1981 were used as a prete.."'t for raising the Sërb· natidnal ·que~Uon .and' fom~I1tlng ·serb nationalist sentiments. The YPA pushed it's Wl:lY oi1to the po'litie"al. stage ·and. v.irtuatly oëcupied Kosovo .. 1 ___,_.:.:..9.:...~ fr,;;;_;. h=· ·e-'sttu=· ·=·· -fit~l~·far· Jeslp· BrQ~ 1!ito"s inberi~nc~ in 1980 ~tarte.d amid ~ à~p ctiish';~ ~ for whié.l1 the polîiïctd ·antl il'itêlleè.ttnd ente. and establishments had ·no answet,s, The Gotantry'''s g~n~r{ll. un.prep~f.~dness for change was lnrge.Jy exacerbatèd by Yt!goslavia's s~1l gene'fis position ·during the pr~cedittg·. fifty. yea1:s, â position based on its: ge·ouslrategic tocatîon·and tbflb:lp,biar division· ofthe world during the Soviet Union-United States Cold War. Tljj~ ;position. g~:Ve Yugoslavia special treatmellt and a !3pecial role on the ·int~n.àtion~1' pplj~jeal stag~ that was far greatèr than its reàl iinportance. The Serbs, who-se unwii.Brt~n~ss:t.o ~;td4.re,ss the. o.p.~n· l~:S.._e$ at.1d their resi?tance to chan,ge resulted h1 nàUoiilil l).pma,gëi:ii'zatioit:. any àttempt to refasltion YtlgÇJslavia undt:;r new ciroutrïstanè~s was perceived· aS~ soh~me to deprlve them of a state of their own. Serbs' ethnie identity, the· tiie11· l~adership. bas utjliz~d \.llld~r ~1e slogan . •FirstJy, the sta~e - secondly, demoèraCiy' ' bioiike'êÎ :ël~mù'ei'àtîZâtion and prevented tlle necessary plur::Hi?..ation 'of ·inl:erests. 'th:e $er-b elite, leéJ .!?.Y' Slébbdart· MiTosèviè, rèverted 'to its natiot:rar programme; . ... ' 4'V.qgoslnViiiil1stn'tesriîon w:ho l.cd·rh~r~t.~nilèc·lo·Nilti uc~;ùptlti(m d11rlng Woi'ld Wat IT, esl!tbllshcd·lnd~pçnd~ce t'roln'\1\'e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Srebrenica Genocide and the Denial Narrative
    DISCUSSION PAPER The Srebrenica Genocide and the Denial Narrative H. N. Keskin DISCUSSION PAPER The Srebrenica Genocide and the Denial Narrative H. N. Keskin The Srebrenica Genocide and the Denial Narrative © TRT WORLD RESEARCH CENTRE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WRITTEN BY H. N. Keskin PUBLISHER TRT WORLD RESEARCH CENTRE July 2021 TRT WORLD İSTANBUL AHMET ADNAN SAYGUN STREET NO:83 34347 ULUS, BEŞİKTAŞ İSTANBUL / TURKEY TRT WORLD LONDON PORTLAND HOUSE 4 GREAT PORTLAND STREET NO:4 LONDON / UNITED KINGDOM TRT WORLD WASHINGTON D.C. 1819 L STREET NW SUITE 700 20036 WASHINGTON DC www.trtworld.com researchcentre.trtworld.com The opinions expressed in this discussion paper represent the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the TRT World Research Centre. 4 The Srebrenica Genocide and the Denial Narrative Introduction he Srebrenica Genocide (also attribute genocidal intent to a particular official referred to as the Srebrenica within the Main Staff may have been motivated Massacre), in which Serbian by a desire not to assign individual culpability soldiers massacred more than to persons not on trial here. This, however, does eight thousand Bosniak civilians not undermine the conclusion that Bosnian Serb Tduring the Bosnian war (1992-1995), has been forces carried out genocide against the Bosnian affirmed as the worst incident of mass murder in Muslims. (United Nations, 2004:12) Europe since World War II. Furthermore, despite the UN’s “safe area” declaration prior to the Further prosecutions were pursued against the genocide in the region, the Bosnian Serb Army of Dutch state in the Dutch Supreme Court for not Republika Srpska (VRS) under the command of preventing the deaths of Bosniak men, women and Ratko Mladić executed more than 8,000 Bosniak children that took refuge in their zone located in 2 (Bosnian Muslims) men and boys and deported Potocari.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Social Briefing: Bosnian Genocide Denial Ivica Bakota
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 17, No. 3 (BH) April 2019 Bosnia-Herzegovina social briefing: Bosnian genocide denial Ivica Bakota 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Bosnian genocide denial Bosnian Genocide denial is believed to be intentional act of Republika Srpska and (to a certain extent) Serbian authorities of denying the planned systematic genocide of 6000 to 7000 Bosniaks from Eastern Bosnia following the siege and capture of Srebrenica by the Srpska Army in July 1995. Serb politicians generally deny the genocide perpetrated against Bosniaks during the Bosnian war, refute claims that Srebrenica massacre constitutes a genocide, revise a number of soldiers and civilians killed during and in the aftermath of the 1995 Srebrenica siege (arguing that the total number of killed did not exceed a half of the number claimed by Bosniak side) and even claim that the genocide is perpetrated against the Serbs during the course of the Bosnian war. As a form of denialism, it can be compared to similar non-mainstream historical revisionisms such as Armenian Genocide denial and Holocaust denial. In generally accepted view shared among foreign experts and historians, however, the Srebrenica massacre is considered as the biggest genocide that occurred in Europe after WWII. A fact exacerbating the controversy of the Bosnian genocide is that it happened relatively soon, only 24 years ago, hence is not (yet) unanimously acknowledged as a historical fact by historians and genocide scholars alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Conditions in the Kingdom of Serbia (1884-1914)
    Monetary Conditions in the Kingdom of Serbia (1884-1914) Branko Hinić, National Bank of Serbia Milan Šojić, National Bank of Serbia Ljiljana Đurđević, National Bank of Serbia Abstract: From 1884 to 1914, the Privileged National Bank of the Kingdom of Serbia managed to establish and maintain relatively stable monetary conditions. On the one hand, its interest rates and lending policy contributed to the lowering and stabilization of exceptionally high market interest rates, and on the other, the National Bank managed to preserve relative stability of the domestic currency. The conversion of paper money to gold or silver was ensured at all times, except in two instances – at the outbreak of the Balkan Wars and World War I. The National Bank could not eliminate agio, but did the best it could to ease its fluctuations. Agio declined as a result of a sharp turnabout in public finances never again to reach the level prior to 1903. The effectiveness of the National Bank in achieving relatively stable monetary conditions is particularly important in light of the circumstances prevailing at the time: wars and economic crises, budget deficits and internal political upheavals. It would be right to say that monetary conditions were largely shaped by the state of public finances. As budget expenditures outstripped the revenues, the government was forced to look for additional funds to cover the deficit by borrowing either abroad or locally, primarily from the National Bank. This had a direct negative effect on the level of gold reserves and indirectly affected the stability of the domestic currency and Bank lending activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Memorandum
    Serbian Memorandum Purloined Hamil never enflame so inexpensively or cobbled any Gardner scorching. Greenish Nikos sometimes skis his anoas structurally and dykes so electrically! Dandyish Xymenes gradated no spectra illuminates unexclusively after Frankie outscorn suicidally, quite reformist. Statistical office and metohija in traffic or just held power. 40 Mihailovi and Kresti Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of. Memorandum by the serbian socialis party upon WorldCat. SERBIAN SWIMMING FEDERATION AND INTERNATIONAL. Also bring you as important details about whose work with English teachers in Serbia. Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences SANU Memorandum. Stevan Stratimirovic the Karlovci Metropolitan from 1790 to 136 and middle head operate the Serbian Church read the Habsburg Monarchy was one put those Serbs. We grieve only slow this supply the support means the Serbian government and strong community Prime Minister of Serbia Ana Brnabi who met come the Rio. Consistent through that instruction I am issuing this memorandum and. Sublime porte a realizable to what is safe area which is not. The turkish practice in other yugoslav society, chakrabarti said aloud what happened when output is. Memorandum of vital Secret Central Bulgarian Committee. Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences MEMORANDUM 196. The SANU Memorandum Intellectual Authority revise the. From their contribution to your reviewing publisher, they refer only those groups have power in combatting local interests were based on this line could not. There are unfortunate products still want it. Ambassador Kyle Scott and the Minister of Health personnel the Serbian government ass dr Zlatibor Loncar today signed a Memorandum of. Commercial memorandum of understanding signed by Lydia Mihalik.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: an Analysis of Globalization Effects on Union and Disintegration of Yugoslavia
    International ResearchScape Journal Volume 1 Article 1 February 2014 The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: An Analysis of Globalization Effects on Union and Disintegration of Yugoslavia Una Bobinac Bowling Green State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/irj Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bobinac, Una (2014) "The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: An Analysis of Globalization Effects on Union and Disintegration of Yugoslavia," International ResearchScape Journal: Vol. 1 , Article 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/irj.01.01.01 Available at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/irj/vol1/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in International ResearchScape Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Bobinac: The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: An Analysis of Globalization Ef Bobinac 1 The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: An Analysis of Globalization Effects on Union and Disintegration of Yugoslavia Una Bobinac ABSTRACT The purpose of writing this project is to identify the influence globalization had in two most important parts of Yugoslavia: its formation as well as its fragmentation. The effects of this ongoing process range from direct intervention in the breakup of Yugoslavia to more indirect influence in its formation. This research strongly centers on previously established and well accepted theories of globalization to illustrate the consequences globalization had on Yugoslavia specifically. Throughout the research, the concept of critical globalism emerges as the prevailing method in the attempt to explain the events that took place in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • (1389) and the Munich Agreement (1938) As Political Myths
    Department of Political and Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Helsinki The Battle Backwards A Comparative Study of the Battle of Kosovo Polje (1389) and the Munich Agreement (1938) as Political Myths Brendan Humphreys ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in hall XII, University main building, Fabianinkatu 33, on 13 December 2013, at noon. Helsinki 2013 Publications of the Department of Political and Economic Studies 12 (2013) Political History © Brendan Humphreys Cover: Riikka Hyypiä Distribution and Sales: Unigrafia Bookstore http://kirjakauppa.unigrafia.fi/ [email protected] PL 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 Helsingin yliopisto ISSN-L 2243-3635 ISSN 2243-3635 (Print) ISSN 2243-3643 (Online) ISBN 978-952-10-9084-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-9085-1 (PDF) Unigrafia, Helsinki 2013 We continue the battle We continue it backwards Vasko Popa, Worriors of the Field of the Blackbird A whole volume could well be written on the myths of modern man, on the mythologies camouflaged in the plays that he enjoys, in the books that he reads. The cinema, that “dream factory” takes over and employs countless mythical motifs – the fight between hero and monster, initiatory combats and ordeals, paradigmatic figures and images (the maiden, the hero, the paradisiacal landscape, hell and do on). Even reading includes a mythological function, only because it replaces the recitation of myths in archaic societies and the oral literature that still lives in the rural communities of Europe, but particularly because, through reading, the modern man succeeds in obtaining an ‘escape from time’ comparable to the ‘emergence from time’ effected by myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States: One Hundred Years of Citizenship
    Štiks, Igor. "Brothers United: The Making of Yugoslavs." Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States: One Hundred Years of Citizenship. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015. 25–36. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474221559.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 07:06 UTC. Copyright © Igor Štiks 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 Brothers United: The Making of Yugoslavs The revolver came from Serbia, but the finger that pulled the trigger that would kill Franz Ferdinand and thus announce the end of one world and the birth of another acted upon two strong beliefs. If one can judge from his statement, underage Gavrilo Princip, like so many of his peers, was foremost convinced that South Slavs should be liberated from a foreign yoke and unite in their own state; this belief was strongly though not articulately mixed with another conviction that the world about to come must be the world of profound social transformation. Two motives with which our story of ‘one hundred years of citizenship’ begins will be repeated in many different forms during this century: should South Slavs have their own common state? Or form separate ones? And, regardless of the answer, should political transformations entail more social equality or only a change of the rulers at the top of the existing hierarchy? Every idea often has deep roots and various historic materializations.
    [Show full text]
  • Scapegoating and the Simulation of Mechanical Solidarity in Former Yugoslavia: “Ethnic Cleansing” and the Serbian Orthodox
    Scapegoating and the Simulation of Mechanical Solidarity in Former Yugoslavia: “Ethnic Cleansing” and the Serbian Orthodox Church Keith Doubt Wittenberg University This essay is published under the above title in Humanity and Society (Vol. 31, No. 1, February 2007), 65-82. I would like to express my appreciation to Ron Berger for his insightful comments and editorial suggestions, as well as Matthew Lynch for his research assistance in the early stages of this study. Direct address correspondence to Keith Doubt, Department of Sociology, Wittenberg University, Springfield, OH 45501-0720 ([email protected]). 2 ABSTRACT In this paper I use the concept of scapegoating to explain the ritualized character of “ethnic cleansing” after the break-up of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. I provide an overview of the political background behind these events, introduce the role and influence of the Serbian Orthodox Church, and analyze the collective violence known as ethnic cleansing through the concept of scapegoating. The Serbian Orthodox Church’s use of a scapegoat paradigm to incite violence created a pseudo-sense of solidarity among the Serbian people. Although this solidarity resembles Émile Durkheim’s concept of mechanical solidarity, I question the stability of this solidarity insofar as it is based on the negativity of war crimes and genocide. Implications for understanding collective violence in other areas such as the Middle East and Iraq are drawn by way of conclusion. REFLEXIVE STATEMENT My interest in the former Yugoslavia began in 1991. I was deeply disheartened by the disturbing reports of crimes against humanity. I started to organize sessions on Bosnia at sociology conferences in Canada and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Defenders in Serbia
    Humanitarian Law Center Research, Documentation and Memory 67 Makenzijeva, 11110 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro Tel/Fax: +381 11 3444 313 +381 11 3444 314 Email: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.hlc.org.yu 26 March 2006 Human Rights Defenders in Serbia Throughout the rule of Slobodan Milošević, Human Rights Organizations and Human Rights Defenders were treated as harmless marginal groups and individuals. Between 1991 and 1999 the regime of Slobodan Milošević did not ban a single anti-war demonstration by nongovernmental organizations because they served as proof to the international community of his ‘democratic’ attitude towards the ‘handful’ that did not support him. The regime and its media paid little attention to the reports of domestic human rights organizations on human rights and humanitarian law violations during the armed conflict because the regime felt secure and supported by the majority of citizens. The period of the NATO bombing campaign from 24 March until 9 June 1999 united the opposition, civil society and regime. Nongovernmental organizations led the way in criticizing the international community and urging the citizens to keep their differences with the government aside as long as bombs kept dropping on the country. It was in those circumstances that several Human Rights Defenders and human rights organizations became the target of government media and secret services above all for publicly pointing out that the regime was taking advantage of the NATO campaign to settle with the Albanians. Because of its attitude during the NATO campaign, the Humanitarian Law Centre (HLC) was twice visited by members of the military security service, who threatened to bring charges of espionage against the HLC Executive Director; also, financial police examined the organization’s accounts and financial records for three weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Dynamics Within the Balkans: the Cases of Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Montenegro
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 80 Issue 1 Symposium: Final Status for Kosovo: Article 4 Untying the Gordian Knot December 2004 Political Dynamics within the Balkans: The Cases of Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Montenegro Lisen Bashkurti Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lisen Bashkurti, Political Dynamics within the Balkans: The Cases of Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Montenegro, 80 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 49 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol80/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. POLITICAL DYNAMICS WITHIN THE BALKANS: THE CASES OF BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA, MACEDONIA, BULGARIA, SERBIA, AND MONTENEGRO DR. LISEN BASHKURTI* INTRODUCTION The origin, history, political doctrines, and geopolitics of the Balkan region make its current political dynamic extremely complicated. The Bal- kan Peninsula lies between Western and Eastern Europe and contains a complex composition of populations. The main reasons for the multifarious nature of Balkan political dynamics are the presence of various civiliza- tions, ethno-cultural identities, contradictory geopolitical orientations, and unique affiliations with other peoples and countries in Europe and the rest of the world. The historical trends of Balkan political dynamics have had three in- terconnected dimensions: national, regional, and geopolitical.
    [Show full text]
  • Same Soil, Different Roots: the Use of Ethno-Specific Narratives During the Homeland War in Croatia
    Same Soil, Different Roots: The Use of Ethno-Specific Narratives During the Homeland War in Croatia Una Bobinac A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in International Studies, Russian, Eastern European, Central Asian Studies University of Washington 2015 Committee: James Felak Daniel Chirot Bojan Belić Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Jackson School of International Studies 2 @Copyright 2015 Una Bobinac 3 University of Washington Abstract Same Soil, Different Roots: The Use of Ethno-Specific Narratives During the Homeland War in Croatia Una Bobinac Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor James Felak History This work looks at the way interpretations and misrepresentations of the history of World War II changed and evolved and their ultimate consequence on the Homeland War in Croatia from 1991 to 1995 between the resident Serb and Croat populations. Explored are the way official narratives were constructed by the communist regime, how and why this narrative was deconstructed, and by more ethno-specific narratives prevailed that fueled the nationalist tendencies of the war. This paper is organized chronologically, beginning with the historical background that puts the rest of the paper into context. The paper also discusses the nationalist resurfacing before the war by examining the Croatian Spring, nationalist re-writings of history, and other matters that influenced the war. The majority of the paper analyzes the way WWII was remembered and dismembered during the late 1980’s and early 1990’s by looking at rhetoric, publications, commemorations, and the role of the Catholic and Serbian Orthodox Churches. Operation Storm, which was the climax of the Homeland War and which expelled 200,000 Serbs serves as an end-point.
    [Show full text]
  • The State-Building in Former Yugoslavia
    Nations into States: National Liberations in Former Yugoslavia Aleksandar Pavkovic Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Melbourne University / Macquaire University National Europe Centre Paper No. 5 The Australian National University 19 October 2001 1 State building and national liberations The process of the creation of new states in the Balkans started in the early 19th century with the creation of the Kingdom of Greece and the Principality of Serbia out of several provinces of the Ottoman Empire. This process has continued into the early 21st century: the Albanian-controlled Kosovo province as well as the Albanian-controlled parts of western Macedonia are likely to become the first new state or states to be created in the Balkans in this century. Moreover, several independence movements in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) are striving for independence or some form of autonomy which may, in time, be transformed into independent statehood. At time of writing, several major political parties in the federal unit of Montenegrov are demanding its secession, while a few major political parties of the Muslim population of Sandzak in Serbia and Montenegro also propagate secession or autonomy of that region. Whether these regions will form new states is, at the time of the writing, still unclear. The latest round of state-building started in June 1991 with the secessions of Croatia and Slovenia from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. By 1995 nine states or state-like entities of the territory of former Yugoslavia1 had proclaimed their independence. In April 1992, the remaining two federal units, Serbia and Montengrof, formed a new state called the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]