Development Team

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development Team Paper No. :09 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Module :1 Introduction to Physiological Anthropology Development Team Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Principal Investigator Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Dr. Rashmi Sinha IGNOU, Delhi Content Writer Dr. Rashmi Sinha IGNOU, Delhi Content Reviewer Prof. Satwanti Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi 1 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Anthropology Introduction to Physiological Anthropology Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 09 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Module Name/Title Introduction to Physiological Anthropology Module Id 1 2 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Anthropology Introduction to Physiological Anthropology Contents Introduction 1. History of Physiology 2. Human Physiology 3. Homeostasis: A defining Feature of Physiology 4. The Scope and Applications of Physiological Anthropology Summary Learning objectives 1. To know about Physiology 2. To have an idea about its history and origin 3. To know about the inter-relatedness of Physiology and Physiological Anthropology by knowing about their scopes 4. To know about homeostasis, an important defining feature of Physiology 3 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Anthropology Introduction to Physiological Anthropology Introduction Physiology is the science of life, which endeavors to appreciate the mechanisms of living, from the molecular basis of cell function to the integrated behaviour of the whole body with a holistic approach. It is the study of function closely related to anatomy a study of form. Due to the recurrent association between form and function, physiology and anatomy are essentially linked and are studied in tandem as part of a medical program. Much of the foundation of knowledge in human physiology was provided by animal experimentation. Research in physiology facilitates in not only understanding the working of the body, but also to comprehend what goes wrong in disease and to identify new treatments for disease. Physiology is an experimental science that forms the basis for biological and clinical sciences that gives an explanation to the detection, prevention and treatment of disease. 1. History of Physiology Physiological studies date back to ancient civilizations of India (Burma and Chakravorty, 2011, Zimmermann, 2015). Archeological and historical records human physiology, as a discipline started around 420 BC in ancient Greece at the Hippocratic School of Medicine. Hippocrates of Kos (460-370 BC), known as the "father of medicine" along with his students wrote extensively on physiology and established medicine as its own discipline. Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), whose focus was on the relationship between structure and function, is also regarded as the pioneer of physiology. The treasured thoughts of Aristotle and his stress on the relationship between structure and function marked the establishment of physiology in ancient Greece. Claudius Galenus (c. 126–199 AD), known as Galen, a prominent Greek physician in ancient Rome, dissected animals and established himself an expert anatomist and physiologist. According to him, monkeys who walked on two legs would probably provide researchers with information that are applicable to humans. Galen also known as the "founder of experimental physiology", was the first to use experiments to probe the functions of the. It was Jean Fernel (1497 - 1558), a French physician, who introduced the term "physiology". There were only sporadic landmarks during the earlier century until the advent of 19th century when physiology started making rapid advancements. Matthias Schleiden (1804-1881), a German botanist, and Theodor Schwann (1810-1882), a German physiologist, co-founders of the cell theory stated that every living thing or organisms are made up of units called cells; with cells being the basic unit structure of everything that lives. Claude Bernard (1813-1878), a French physiologist, further proposed and discovered the concept of milieu interieur (the environment within) in which he refers to the extra-cellular fluid environment 4 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Anthropology Introduction to Physiological Anthropology which protects tissues and organs of multicellular living organisms. It was American physiologist Walter Cannon (1871-1945), who named it "homeostasis" later. By homeostasis, Cannon meant "the maintenance of steady states in the body and the physiological processes through which they are regulated" (Brown and Fee, 2002). Joseph Lister (1858) worked on the reasons for blood coagulation and inflammation that arose following injuries and surgical wounds. He later discovered antiseptics, whose properties could dramatically reduce surgical mortality rates. During the 1870s, when Harvard University, USA, started a medical physiology program, Henry Bowditch was its first full -time faculty member. Ivan Pavlov (1891) famous for his Pavlov’s experiment observed how dogs' saliva production would respond to various sounds and other stimuli. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine and Physiology in 1904. It was during this time that the scientists showed increased interest in how non-human beings function. 20th century witnessed the advent of comparative physiology and ecophysiology. Knut Schmidt- Nielsen and George Bartholomew are prominent physiologists of this field and its advances led to evolutionary physiology becoming a distinct subdiscipline. The first hormone adrenaline from adrenal gland to be identified and synthesized was in 1901 by John Jacob Abel and Jokichi Takamine. In 1911, J. S. Haldane and other respiratory physiologists, climbed to Pike's Peak to study the effect of altitude on human breathing. Charles Best and Frederick Banting who won the Nobel Prize in 1923 isolated insulin in dogs. Their study turned diabetes from a deadly disease to a chronic one. Andrew Huxley and Alan Hodgkin (1952) discovered the ionic mechanism which showed that nerve impulses are transmitted. With the advances in the physiological studies of the heart, Christiaan Barnard, South Africa, performed the first successful human heart transplant in 1967. Physiologists during 1960’s realized that there was a sharp fall in blood pressure in snakebite victims which resulted in their fainting. Continued work resulted in isolation of the compound in the snake venom that blocked ACE (angiotensin converting enzyyme), an enzyme that controls blood pressure. Consequently research on ACE inhibitors, drugs for controlling hypertension (high blood pressure), were developed and later approved by the US FDA. The discovery of cystic fibrosis gene by Lap Chee Tsui, Jack Riordan and Francis Collins was in 1989. Paul Nurse, Leland Hartwell and Timothy Hunt in 2001 are responsible for discovery of the mechanism that regulates cell growth, division and death. 2. Human physiology Human physiology is the scientific study of normal body function to understand the cause-and-effect mechanisms of how cells, tissues, organs, and body systems work when in a healthy state. Human physiology seeks to understand the mechanisms that work to keep the human body alive and 5 Physiology and Sports Anthropology Anthropology Introduction to Physiological Anthropology functioning (Hall, 2011), through scientific enquiry into the nature of mechanical, physical, and biochemical functions of humans, their organs, and the cells of which they are composed. The principal level of focus of physiology is at the level of organs and systems within systems. The endocrine and nervous systems play major roles in the reception and transmission of signals that integrate function in animals. It is a study of normal biological function, from cell to tissue, tissue to organ, and organ to system, as well as how the organism as a whole accomplishes particular tasks essential to life. In the study of physiology, the emphasis is on mechanisms— on exactly how a particular function is performed. For example, how is the heartbeat produced, and how is the heart rate regulated? How do we digest dietary fat? How is the blood sugar concentration regulated? The answers to these questions contain cause and-effect sequences. Human physiology is a part of the more general science of mammalian physiology, which is a subcategory of vertebrate physiology. The study of human physiology gains significance because it is the major scientific foundation of medicine and other health applications. This relationship is recognized by the Nobel Prize committee, which awards prizes in a category called “Physiology or Medicine.” (http://cristinafisiologia.org/arquivos/equilibrio_homeostase/fox_2009_chapter01_introd_physiol.pdf). It is a useful discipline for an understanding of physiological processes and mechanisms basic to all health professions. Homeostasis is a major aspect with regard to such interactions within plants as well as animals. The biological basis of the study of physiology, integration refers to the overlap of many functions of the systems of the human body, as well as its accompanied form. It is achieved through communication that occurs in a variety of ways, both electrical and chemical (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physiology). 3. Homeostasis: A defining Feature of Physiology An understanding of human physiology remains incomplete without the mention of homeostasis. During Aristotle’s era physicians agreed that food health was one way or another linked to a balance among, the multiple life-sustaining forces (“humors”) in the body. It took rather a very long
Recommended publications
  • BMC Systems Biology Biomed Central
    BMC Systems Biology BioMed Central Commentary Open Access The long journey to a Systems Biology of neuronal function Nicolas Le Novère* Address: EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, CB10 1SD Hinxton, UK Email: Nicolas Le Novère* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 13 June 2007 Received: 13 April 2007 Accepted: 13 June 2007 BMC Systems Biology 2007, 1:28 doi:10.1186/1752-0509-1-28 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1752-0509/1/28 © 2007 Le Novère; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Computational neurobiology was born over half a century ago, and has since been consistently at the forefront of modelling in biology. The recent progress of computing power and distributed computing allows the building of models spanning several scales, from the synapse to the brain. Initially focused on electrical processes, the simulation of neuronal function now encompasses signalling pathways and ion diffusion. The flow of quantitative data generated by the "omics" approaches, alongside the progress of live imaging, allows the development of models that will also include gene regulatory networks, protein movements and cellular remodelling. A systems biology of brain functions and disorders can now be envisioned. As it did for the last half century, neuroscience can drive forward the field of systems biology. 1 Modelling nervous function, an ancient quest To accurately model neuronal function presents many Neurosciences have a long and successful tradition of challenges, and stretches the techniques and resources of quantitative modelling, where theory and experiment computational biology to their limits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Llewelyn-Davies and the Architect's Dilemma."
    The Richard Llewciy11-Davies Memorial Lectures in ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY March 3, 1985-at the Institute for Advanced Study The J/ictoria11 City: Images and Realities Asa Briggs Provost of Worcester College University of Oxford November 17, 1986--at the University of London The Nuffield Planning Inquiry Brian Flo\vers Vice-Chancellor University of London October 27, 1987-at the Institute for Advanced Study Richard Llewcly11-Davics and the Architect's Dilemma N ocl Annan Vice-Chancellor Erncritus University of London PREFACE The Richard Llewelyn-Davies Memorial Lectures in "Environ­ ment and Society" were established to honor the memory of an architect distinguished in the fields of contemporary architectural, urban and environmental planning. Born in Wales in 1912, Richard Llewelyn-Davies was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, !'Ecole des Beaux Arts in Paris and the Architectural Association in London. In 1960 he began a fif­ teen-year association with University College of the University of London as Professor of Architecture, Professor of Town Planning, Head of the Bartlett School of Architecture and Dean of the School of Environmental Studies. He became, in 1967, the initial chair­ man of Britain's Centre for Environmental Studies, one of the world's leading research organizations on urbanism, and held that post for the rest of his life. He combined his academic career with professional practice in England, the Middle East, Africa, Paki­ stan, North and South America. In the fall of 1980, the year before he died, Richard Llewelyn­ Davies came to the Institute for Advanced Study. He influenced us in many ways, from a reorientation of the seating arrangement in the seminar room improving discussion and exchange, to the per­ manent implantation of an environmental sensibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin
    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52
    Garson, J. (2015) “The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube,” Science in Context 28: 31-52. Preprint (not copyedited or formatted) Please use DOI when citing or quoting: https://doi- org.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/10.1017/S0269889714000313 The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube Word Count: 10, 418 Abstract: As historian Henning Schmidgen notes, the scientific study of the nervous system would have been ‘unthinkable’ without the industrialization of communication in the 1830s. Historians have investigated extensively the way nerve physiologists have borrowed concepts and tools from the field of communications, particularly regarding the nineteenth-century work of figures like Helmholtz and in the American Cold War Era. The following focuses specifically on the interwar research of the Cambridge physiologist Edgar Douglas Adrian, and on the technology that led to his Nobel-Prize- winning research, the thermionic vacuum tube. Many countries used the vacuum tube during the war for the purpose of amplifying and intercepting coded messages. These events provided a context for Adrian’s evolving understanding of the nerve fiber in the 1920s. In particular, they provide the background for Adrian’s transition around 1926 to describing the nerve impulse in terms of “information,” “messages,” “signals,” or even “codes,” and for translating the basic principles of the nerve, such as the all-or-none principle and adaptation, into such an “informational” context. The following also places Adrian’s research in the broader context of the changing relationship between science and technology, and between physics and physiology, in the first few decades of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • DMJ.1936.2.1.A02.Young.Pdf (3.644Mb)
    DALHOUSIE MEDICAL JOURNAL 5 A Memorable Conference THE HARVARD TERCENTENARY 1636 - 1936 E. GORDON YOUNG, B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D., F.R.S.C. OMEONE has said that the most valuable and rarest thing in the world S is a new idea. It is the verdict or the intellectual world of science, of art and of music that progress centres largely about the thoughts ex­ pressed by the few great minds of the centuries. The work of the scientists of the world has been likened to a great canvas, the subject of which has been chosen by the few and the first bold lines inserted, but the great mass of colour and detail has been supplied by the many faithful apprentices. It was most fitting that the oldest and greatest of American Universities should celebrate its three hundredth birthday in an intellec­ tual feast and that it should invite to its table as leaders of conversation the greatest minds of the world in those subjects which were proposed for discussion. Harvard.!J.as a magnificent record of intellectual tolerance and its hospitality was open to individuals of all nationalities and all re- ligious and political creeds. To Cambridge thus in the early days of September, 1936, there came, by invitation, a group of about two thousand five hundred American and Canadian scholars to participate in a memorable series of symposia led by a special group of sixty-seven eminent scientists and men of letters from fifteen different countries. These included no fewer than eleven men who had the greatest single distinction in the realms of science and of letters, the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual
    2016 TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge trinity college cambridge annual record annual record 2016 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2015–2016 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Contents 5 Editorial 11 Commemoration 12 Chapel Address 15 The Health of the College 18 The Master’s Response on Behalf of the College 25 Alumni Relations & Development 26 Alumni Relations and Associations 37 Dining Privileges 38 Annual Gatherings 39 Alumni Achievements CONTENTS 44 Donations to the College Library 47 College Activities 48 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 53 Field Clubs 71 Students’ Union and Societies 80 College Choir 83 Features 84 Hermes 86 Inside a Pirate’s Cookbook 93 “… Through a Glass Darkly…” 102 Robert Smith, John Harrison, and a College Clock 109 ‘We need to talk about Erskine’ 117 My time as advisor to the BBC’s War and Peace TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 3 123 Fellows, Staff, and Students 124 The Master and Fellows 139 Appointments and Distinctions 141 In Memoriam 155 A Ninetieth Birthday Speech 158 An Eightieth Birthday Speech 167 College Notes 181 The Register 182 In Memoriam 186 Addresses wanted CONTENTS TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 4 Editorial It is with some trepidation that I step into Boyd Hilton’s shoes and take on the editorship of this journal. He managed the transition to ‘glossy’ with flair and panache. As historian of the College and sometime holder of many of its working offices, he also brought a knowledge of its past and an understanding of its mysteries that I am unable to match.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Models of Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3z3879vp Journal Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 14(3) ISSN 1759-5029 Authors Kleinert, Maximilian Clemmensen, Christoffer Hofmann, Susanna M et al. Publication Date 2018-03-01 DOI 10.1038/nrendo.2017.161 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California REVIEWS Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus Maximilian Kleinert1–4, Christoffer Clemmensen1–3, Susanna M. Hofmann3,5,6, Mary C. Moore7, Simone Renner3,8, Stephen C. Woods9, Peter Huypens3,10, Johannes Beckers3,10,11, Martin Hrabe de Angelis3,10,11, Annette Schürmann3,12, Mostafa Bakhti3,5,13, Martin Klingenspor14,15,16, Mark Heiman17, Alan D. Cherrington7, Michael Ristow18, Heiko Lickert3,5,13, Eckhard Wolf3,8, Peter J. Havel19, Timo D. Müller1–3 and Matthias H. Tschöp1–3 Abstract | More than one-third of the worldwide population is overweight or obese and therefore at risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. In order to mitigate this pandemic, safer and more potent therapeutics are urgently required. This necessitates the continued use of animal models to discover, validate and optimize novel therapeutics for their safe use in humans. In order to improve the transition from bench to bedside, researchers must not only carefully select the appropriate model but also draw the right conclusions. In this Review, we consolidate the key information on the currently available animal models of obesity and diabetes and highlight the advantages, limitations and important caveats of each of these models. On the current trajectory, over half of the adult pop- To tackle these objectives, researchers rely on diverse ani- ulation in the United States will be obese by 2030, and mal models that span multiple species and strategic scien- similar increments are likely to occur in other developed tific approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • (Rh) Factor Studies, Dr. Bruce Chown, and the Faculty Of
    THE BIRTH OF A MEDICAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME. THE RHESUS (RH) FACTOR STUDIES, DR. BRUCE CHOWN, AND THE FACULTY OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA, 1883-1946. By C. Peter W. Warren A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Joint Master‟s Program Departments of History University of Manitoba / University of Winnipeg Winnipeg Copyright © 2011 by C. Peter W. Warren i NOTE TO READERS Dr. C. Peter Warren passed away suddenly on 3 May 2011. He had finished this thesis, and we were in the process of scheduling his defence. Dr. Warren did not defend the thesis, but Dr. Greg Smith, Chair of the Joint Master‟s Program, and Dr. J Doering, Dean of the Faculty of Graduate Studies, agreed with Dr. Warren‟s family that the thesis should be made available for future scholars. Dr. Warren‟s thesis examining committee (Drs. Esyllt Jones, Emőke J. E. Szathmáry and Gerald Friesen) read the thesis and suggested a small number of typographical and editorial changes, and I am very grateful to them for their commitment to finishing this project. In two cases, I have inserted comments [ed.:] in order to clarify particular points. Apart from a small number of obvious omissions and errors which I have silently corrected, the work and words are as Dr. Warren wrote them. James Hanley Associate Professor of History University of Winnipeg 15 August 2011 ii Abstract The thesis is an analysis of the birth of the Rhesus (Rh) Factor Research Programme in the Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fessard's School of Neurophysiology After
    The fessard’s School of neurophysiology after the Second World War in france: globalisation and diversity in neurophysiological research (1938-1955) Jean-Gaël Barbara To cite this version: Jean-Gaël Barbara. The fessard’s School of neurophysiology after the Second World War in france: globalisation and diversity in neurophysiological research (1938-1955). Archives Italiennes de Biologie, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, 2011. halshs-03090650 HAL Id: halshs-03090650 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03090650 Submitted on 11 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Fessard’s School of neurophysiology after the Second World War in France: globalization and diversity in neurophysiological research (1938-1955) Jean- Gaël Barbara Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS UMR 7102 Université Denis Diderot, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS UMR 7219 [email protected] Postal Address : JG Barbara, UPMC, case 14, 7 quai Saint Bernard, 75005,
    [Show full text]
  • Cells of the Nervous System
    3/23/2015 Nervous Systems | Principles of Biology from Nature Education contents Principles of Biology 126 Nervous Systems A flock of Canada geese use auditory and visual cues to maintain a V­ formation in flight. How are these animals able to respond so quickly to environmental cues? All animals possess neurons, cells that form a complex network capable of transmitting and receiving signals. This neural network forms the nervous system. The nervous system coordinates the movement and internal physiology of an organism, as well as its decision­making and behavior. In all but the simplest animals, neurons are bundled into nerves that facilitate signal transmission. More complex animals have a central nervous system (CNS) that includes the brain and nerve cords. Vertebrates also have a peripheral nervous system (PNS) that transmits signals between the body and the CNS. Cells of the Nervous System Structure of the neuron. Figure 1 shows the general structure of a neuron. The organelles and nucleus of a neuron are contained in a large central structure called the cell body, or soma. Most nerve cells also have multiple dendrites in addition to the cell body. Dendrites are short, branched extensions that receive signals from other neurons. Each neuron also has a single axon, a long extension that transmits signals to other cells. The point of attachment of the axon to the cell body is called the axon hillock. The other end of the axon is usually branched, and each branch ends in a synaptic terminal. The synaptic terminal forms a synapse, or junction, with another cell.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systems Approach to Biology
    A systems approach to biology SB200 Lecture 1 16 September 2008 Jeremy Gunawardena [email protected] Jeremy Walter Johan Gunawardena Fonatana Paulsson Topics for this lecture What is systems biology? Why do we need mathematics and how is it used? Mathematical foundations – dy namical systems. Cellular decision making What is systems biology? How do the collective interactions of the components give rise to the physiology and pathology of the system? Marc Kirschner, “ The meaning of systems biology”, Cell 121:503-4 2005. Top-down ª-omicsº system = whole cell / organism model = statistical correlations data = high-throughput, poor quality too much data, not enough analysis Bottom-up ªmechanisticº system = network or pathway model = mechanistic, biophysical data = quantitative, single-cell not enough data, too much analysis Why do we need mathematics? There have always been two traditions in biology ... Descriptive Analytical 1809-1882 1822-1884 Mathematics allows you to guess the invisible components before anyone works out how to find them ... Bacterial potassium channel closed (left) and open (right) – Dutta & Goodsell, “Mo lecule of the Month” , Feb 2003, PDB. but these days we know many of the components – and there are an awful lot of them – so how are models used in systems biology? Thick models More detail leads to improved quantitative prediction simulation of electrical activity in a mechanically realistic whole heart Dennis Noble, “ Modeling the heart – from genes to cells to the whole organ” , Science 295:1678-82 2002. Thick models E coli biochemical circuit screen shot of simulated E coli swimming in 0.1mM Asp Bray, Levin & Lipkow, “ The chemotactic behaviour of computer-based surrogate bacteria” , Curr Biol 17:12-9 2007.
    [Show full text]