DOCSLIB.ORG

Order 6480.7D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Order 6480.7D ORDER 6480.7D AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AND TERMINAL RADAR APPROACH CONTROL FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES August 11, 2004 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Distribution: A-W(AF/AT/SD) 2; A-Y-2; A-Z-2; Initiated By: ATB-300 A-X(AF/AT)-3; A-FAF-0(STD) RECORD OF CHANGES CHANGE SUPPLEM ENT OPTIONAL CHANGE SUPPLEM ENT OPTIONAL TO TO BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320-5 (6-80) use previous edition 6480.7D 8/11/04 FOREWORD This order sets forth guidelines and fundamental requirements for design of airport traffic control towers (ATCTs) and terminal radar approach control (TRACONs) facilities to be used by engineers, designers, planners, and procurement personnel engaged in the establishment, replacement, or modernization of these facilities. This issue incorporates changes to Order 6480.7C, Airport Traffic Control Tower and Terminal Radar Approach Control Facility Design Guidelines, dated 28 April 1995, necessary to bring it up to date. i 6480.7D 8/11/04 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................... i CHAPTER 1. GENERAL SECTION l. INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Distribution .................................................................................................................. 1-1 3. Cancellation ................................................................................................................. 1-1 4. Explanation of Changes ............................................................................................... 1-1 5. Applicability................................................................................................................. 1-2 6. Requests for Information ............................................................................................. 1-2 7. Objective ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 8. Scope ............................................................................................................................ 1-2 9. Organization ................................................................................................................. 1-3 10. References .................................................................................................................. 1-3 SECTION 2. ATCT/TRACON DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 11. Preliminary Considerations ........................................................................................ 1-3 12. Basic Policy Directives .............................................................................................. 1-4 13. Overview of the Development Process ...................................................................... 1-4 Figure 1-1. ATCT Planning and Establishment Process Flow Chart .............................. 1-5 SECTION 3. PROJECT PLANNING 14. Data Collection .......................................................................................................... 1-6 15. Formulate Design Criteria .......................................................................................... 1-6 16. Preliminary Design Concept ...................................................................................... 1-6 17. Design Guideline Waivers ......................................................................................... 1-6 SECTION 4. IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 18. Environmental Impact ................................................................................................ 1-7 19. Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs ....................................................... 1-7 20. Energy Conservation .................................................................................................. 1-7 21. Codes.......................................................................................................................... 1-8 22. Deviations from Standards ......................................................................................... 1-8 23. Project Documents ..................................................................................................... 1-8 24. Security ...................................................................................................................... 1-9 Page ii 6480.7D 8/11/04 CHAPTER 2. BASIC DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 1. GENERAL 25. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2-1 SECTION 2. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES 26. ATCT/TRACON Classifications ............................................................................... 2-1 27. Jurisdiction of Airspace Control ................................................................................ 2-3 28. Establishment Criteria ................................................................................................ 2-3 SECTION 3. AIRWAY FACILITY RESPONSIBILITIES 29. Equipment Maintenance ............................................................................................ 2-4 30. Facility Maintenance .................................................................................................. 2-4 31. Possible Additional Accommodations ....................................................................... 2-5 32-33. Reserved ............................................................................................................... 2-5 34. Staffing and Space Relationship ................................................................................ 2-5 35. Variations in Equipment and Installation................................................................... 2-5 36. Specialized Environmental Factors .......................................................................... 2-17 37. Other Space Requirements ....................................................................................... 2-17 38. Special ATCT/TRACON Classifications ................................................................ 2-18 38-1. FAA Contract Tower Equipment.......................................................................... 2-18 CHAPTER 3. REPRESENTATIVE AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS AND TERMINAL RADAR APPROACH CONTROL FACILITIES SECTION 1. BASIC COMPONENTS 39. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3-1 40. Control Cab ................................................................................................................ 3-1 41. Tower Shaft ................................................................................................................ 3-1 42. Base Building ............................................................................................................. 3-1 SECTION 2. BASIC CONFIGURATION 43. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3-1 44. Base Building and Non-Functional Shaft .................................................................. 3-1 45. Flexibility of the Basic Configuration ....................................................................... 3-2 46. Variations of the Basic Configuration ....................................................................... 3-2 47.-49. Reserved .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Figure 3-1 Representative Airport Traffic Control Facilities .......................................... 3-3 Figure 3-2 Representative Airport Traffic Control Facilities .......................................... 3-4 Figure 3-3 Representative Airport Traffic Control Facilities .......................................... 3-5 Page iii 6480.7D 8/11/04 Figure 3-4 Representative Airport Traffic Control Facilities .......................................... 3-6 SECTION 3. REPRESENTATIVE SITE LAYOUTS 50. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3-6 51. Comparative Examples .............................................................................................. 3-7 52.-53. Reserved .............................................................................................................. 3-7 SECTION 4. REPRESENTATIVE TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL SPACE LAYOUTS 54. Description ................................................................................................................. 3-7 55.-58. Reserved .............................................................................................................. 3-7 CHAPTER 4.SITE SELECTION AND DESIGN SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 59. General ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 60. Guidelines .................................................................................................................. 4-1 SECTION 2. SITE SELECTION 61. Preliminary Considerations ........................................................................................ 4-1 62. Siting Criteria ............................................................................................................. 4-4 63. Approval ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Counterguerrilla Operation
    FM 90-8 counterguerrilla operation/ AUGUST 1986 This publication contains technical or operational information that is for official government use only. Distribution is limited to US Government agencies Requests from outside the US Government for release of this publication under the Freedom of Information Act or the Foreign Military Sales Program must be made to: HO TR ADOC, Fort Monroe, VA 23651 ... HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION- Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. FM 90-8 CHAPTER 6. COMBAT SUPPORT Section I. General ............................................ 6-1 II. Reconnaissance and Surveillance Units ............. 6-2 Ill. Fire Support Units ................................. 6-7 CHAPTER 7. COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT Section I. General ............................................ 7-1 II. Bases ............................................. 7-1 Ill. Use of Assets ...................................... 7-3 APPENDIX A. SUBSURFACE OPERATIONS Section I. General ............................................ A-1 II. Tunneling .......................................... A-2 Ill. Destroying Underground Facilities ................. A-12 APPENDIX B. THE URBAN GUERRILLA Section I. General ............................................ B-1 II. Techniques to Counter the Urban Guerrilla .......... B-2 APPENDIX C. AMBUSH PATROLS Section I. General ............................................ C-1 II. Attack Fundamentals .............................. C-2 Ill. Planning ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • URL ] Tends to Match up with the Photographs
    archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Skeggs_02.doc [pdf] *** last updated 02/13/2005 *** more is at http://www.stealthskater.com/PX.htm#StarChamber From: "Thomas Skeggs" Date: Sun, July 13, 2003 9:47 am To: [email protected] Subject: Philadelphia Photo Hello Mark -- In my old collection of papers, I found a British article called "The Physics of a Flying Saucer" by Ted Roach, an Australian Engineer. (The pictures do not appear in his book). In this article was a brief paragraph on the Philadelphia Experiment. It included 2 photos. The caption reads “The USS Eldridge and the prototype machinery used in the infamous Philadelphia Experiment". There are no credits to these pictures. The article appeared in the now defunct Alien Encounters magazine, September 1997. I don’t know if the pictures are genuine. The description in Chica Bruce’s book [SS: see doc pdf URL ] tends to match up with the photographs. (I attached one photo in JPEG format. I can send the other if you want a copy.) Last week, I ordered some books including The Philadelphia Experiment Murder which you pointed out. Plus I ordered Montauk Revisited and the Pyramids of Montauk. And they arrived today (July 10). I was taken aback by some of the claims made by Preston Nichols. I see what you really mean when he goes off on a tangent. I thought his first book was but too unbelievable. I have only flicked through them. The remote-viewing data points to a scheme where children were being used in the program, and it relates to the strange and disturbing dreams.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Qualifying Project the Educational Case for a Simulated Lunar Base
    Interactive Qualifying Project The Educational Case for a Simulated Lunar Base By: Justin Linnehan Patrick Nietupski Nicholas Wheeler Advisor: John Wilkes March 11, 2010 1 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 The New Space Race...................................................................................................................................... 9 The Case for Construction of a Mock Lunar Base in Worcester .................................................................. 29 A Study of the Feasibility of the Proposal: Worcester Science Teacher Reaction ...................................... 43 Educational case .......................................................................................................................................... 51 AIAA Conference ......................................................................................................................................... 55 Doherty High School’s After School Club ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Edward Kiker ................................................................................................................................................ 75 N.E.A.M. Expo and Table Top Model ........................................................................................................... 80 Elm Park School ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • D U M B S DUMBS Stands for Deep Underground Military Bases
    Downloaded from: justpaste.it/DUMBS D U M B S DUMBS stands for Deep Underground Military Bases attempted to map every US Military base, and it was not easy How they build them: D.U.M.B Deep Underground Military Bases and Tunnel boring Machines of the NWO There are at least 1,400 DUMBS worldwide, 188 known DUMBS in the U.S., with 2 underground bases being built per year in the U.S. The average depth of bases are 4.25 miles underground. Each DUMB base-costs between 17 & 26 billion $ to build, which is funded by MI6/CIA drug money & human trafficking money. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-ZaVrUySBj0uyPfbn03n4Z1xbnMdfIQG 2008 D.U.M.B.s Deep Underground Military Base Satellites found ‘secret’ U.S. military bases How a Fitness App's Heat Map Uncovers Military Bases | NYT Lost Worlds: Inside Secret US Bunkers (S2, E5) | Full Episode | History D U M B S Deep Underground Military Bases Deep Underground Military Bases (Great Video & Description) 2011\ Armoured Skeptic D.U.M.B.S - Deep Underground Military Bases - Secret Strongholds Dulce Base - The Phil Schneider Story List of DUMBs by State – Complete List of Military Underground Bases in USA [VIDEO] https://odysee.com/@stpierrs:f/DUMBSA:a? r=FyJPjTmd6FLhBHDPWALPDe9zo1kJv1Sr Denver Airport “There is the Deep Underground Military Base underneath Denver International Airport There are reports of electronic/magnetic vibrations which make some people sick and cause headaches in others. There are acres of fenced-in areas which have barbed wire pointing into the area as if to keep things in, and small concrete stacks that resemble mini-cooling towers rise out of the acres of nowhere to apparently vent underground levels.
    [Show full text]
  • DUMB Deep Underground Military Bases the Underground War FULL
    DUMB Deep Underground Military Bases The Underground War FULL UPDATE Gene Decode The GREAT SPIRITUAL WAR for The SURVIVAL of EDEN EARTH & HUMANITY This war has been going on for over 2 decades. God chose Humanity as the most important species in ALL of creation, this is why it is the primary target the evil darkness wants to destroy. Ephesians 6:12—For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. There are 4 stages of this Great Spiritual battle between good & evil or the evil darkness forces that stand opposed to the Divine Plan of The One True Living God & those of The Light that have dedicated themselves to Humble Service In The Name Of the One True Living God & His Son Jesus Christ. The 4 stages necessary to complete to win this war against the evil darkness that descended centuries ago to Earth & attacked Humanity: 1. Remove the evil darkness from the Space about the Earth and maintain permanent supremacy there-in. 2. Remove the evil darkness from Earth’s skies and maintain permanent supremacy their-in. 3. Remove the evil darkness from the surface of the Earth and maintain permanent supremacy their-in. 4. Remove the evil darkness from the beneath the surface of the Earth (under the Earth’s surface; throughout ALL tunnels, labyrinths & Caverns) & maintain permanent supremacy their-in. Stage 1 & 2 Are mostly completed by the Q Alliance. Stage 3 Has had vast advances by the Q Alliance with only a few strongholds left: mainly being China, Iran & Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Texascaver 2005-12-01.Pdf
    Haby Cave, also known as Cave of the Lakes, was new to Texas cavers in October 1965 when Glenda Kunath posed for this picture. Unfortunately, the cave was soon closed (some say the entrance has been permanently closed with a bulldozer) and few people have been privileged to visit this cave. A cropped black and white conversion of this photo appeared on the cover of the February 1966 Texas Caver. Carl Kunath. About the cover: This special issue features selected covers from the last 50 years of the Texas Caver. We looked at every issue (all 500 ± of them) and tried to choose something representative of the Caver from each decade. Unfortunately, some of the finest photographs were not well printed originally and to scan and reprint those didn’t seem like a good idea. We did the best we could with the material available. February 1956: Artwork by Bill Helmer. Dittoed on yellow paper. See more of Bill’s cartoon skills elsewhere in this issue. June 1966: Carl Kunath made this picture of the famed Butterfly at Caverns of Sonora with only the light from a flashlight. It may be the most-photographed feature in a Texas cave. The right wing was vandalized in 2006. September 1971: Ronnie Fieseler made this classic picture of Jon Everage during the project to gate the lower entrance of Midnight Cave. December 1985: Allan Cobb captured (top to bottom) Kurt Menking, Randy Waters, Bob Cowell, Joe Ivy, and Carl Ponebshek at the newly completed entrance to Honey Creek Cave. March 1993: James Jasek made this nice view in Oriente Milestone Molasses Bat Cave, one of Texas’ rarely visited caves.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauder C/O Adventures Unlimited Box 74 Kempton, IL 60946 USA
    Table of Contents Foreword: A Cautionary Note To UFO Buffs..............................5 1. Oh Yes, They're Real!......................................................... 10 2. The Military Underground: Air Force, Army and Navy ..........................................................................21 3. The Ultimate War Rooms: Fighting the Big One From Deep Underground............................................................43 4. More Underground Facilities: Military, Government, Nuclear and Business............................................62 5. The Mother of All Underground Tunnels? ..........................72 6. Tunnelling Machines: The Conventional Types and the Science Fiction "Black" Models ....................................84 7. Nuclear Testing, the EPA, Abductions, Animal Mutilations (and Aliens?) ............................................103 8. Abductions, Needles and Implants: A Fresh Approach.....................................................................112 9. Is the U.S. Military Involved in "Alien" Cattle Mutilations? ...................................................................121 Afterword: Last Words On Underground Bases, Tunnels and Exotic Tunneling Machines...................................................................................126 Illustrations....................................................The Middle Section Footnotes ..................................................................................131 Index........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are All the Deep Underground Military Bases? (Part 2)
    Where Are All the Deep Underground Military Bases? (Part 2) By Dr. Richard Sauder With Commentary By Shepard Ambellas & Alex Thomas theintelhub.com April 17, 2012 (This is Part 2 of an ongoing and exclusive underground base series with excerpts from the book Hidden in Plain Sight provided to theintelhub.com by the publisher, including commentary by Shepard Ambellas and Alex Thomas.) Read part 1,“Nazi Engineers, Secret U.S. Military Bases, and Elevators To The Subterranean and Submarine Depths.” In the continental USA there are numerous underground bases. I will briefly list just some of the bases that my research has uncovered over the last 17 years. There are assuredly many more than those listed here. Maryland ■ Camp David, the Presidential retreat, is immediately adjacent to Catoctin Mountain Park. On the surface there are some cabins and lodges, and conference rooms for Presidential use. But most of this facility runs like a labyrinthine anthill under Catoctin Mountain, just west of Thurmont, Maryland, along Rte. 15 between Frederick, Maryland and Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The facility is operated and maintained by the U.S. Navy Seabees. The U.S. Marines provide military security. I have spoken to an individual who used to work there on a classified maintenance contract. My source informed me that the underground portions of Camp David are so extensive and elaborate, and there are so many miles of secret tunnels, that it is doubtful that any one person would have a complete map of the facility in his or her mind. In other words, we hear or read the words, Camp David, in the mainstream news media, but understand virtually nothing of what really happens there, or what the full nature of the installation really is.
    [Show full text]
  • Ni43-101Feasibility Study Technical Report on the Curraghinalt Gold
    DALRADIAN RESOURCES INC. CURRAGHINALT FEASIBILITY STUDY NI 43-101 FEASIBILITY STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE CURRAGHINALT GOLD PROJECT NORTHERN IRELAND Qualified Persons Company Prepared for: Garett Macdonald, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. Michael Makarenko, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. Indi Gopinathan, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. Dalradian Resources Inc. Stacy Freudigmann, P.Eng. JDS Energy & Mining Inc. Suite 416 – 207 Queens Quay West Jean-François Couture, P.Geo SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Toronto, ON M5J 1A7 Bruce Murphy, P.Eng. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Cam Scott, P.Eng. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2016 William Harding, C.Geol. SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd. Effective Date: December 12, 2016 REPORT DATE: JANUARY 25, 2017 i DALRADIAN RESOURCES INC. CURRAGHINALT FEASIBILITY STUDY NOTICE JDS Energy & Mining, Inc. prepared this National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report, in accordance with Form 43-101F1, for Dalradian Resources Inc. The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is based on: (i) information available at the time of preparation; (ii) data supplied by outside sources, and (iii) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. Dalradian Resources Inc. filed this Technical Report with the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities pursuant to provincial securities legislation. Except for the purposes legislated under provincial securities law, any other use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. Effective Date:
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Analyses and Cable Bolt Support Design for a Deep Large-Span Stope at the Hongtoushan Mine, China
    sustainability Article Stability Analyses and Cable Bolt Support Design for A Deep Large-Span Stope at the Hongtoushan Mine, China Xingdong Zhao *, Huaibin Li , Shujing Zhang and Xiaoming Yang Geomechanics Research Center, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China; [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (S.Z.); [email protected] (X.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 September 2019; Accepted: 31 October 2019; Published: 3 November 2019 Abstract: This study presents stability analyses and a cable bolt support design for a typical deep large-span stope (1-1# stope) at the Hongtoushan mine in China, using an integrated empirical and numerical method. Detailed field work including quantification of joint distribution and surface quality, along with laboratory test on intact rock samples, were performed to obtain the geotechnical properties of rock masses. The rock mass of the 1-1# stope was characterized by rock mass rating (RMR), rock mass quality (Q), and geological strength index (GSI), and then the modulus, peak strength, cohesive strength, and internal friction angle of the rock mass were estimated. The stability of the stope was then evaluated by empirical (RMR, stability graph) and numerical approaches (limit equilibrium analyses with UNWEDGE and stress-strain analyses with FLAC3D), considering of the effects of rock mass quality, induced stress, and large-span. A cable bolt support system obtained from the empirical method, was then further analyzed using the FLAC3D and UNWEDGE codes. The results show that the maximum plastic zone thickness and vertical displacement at the stope roof decrease significantly and the safety factor of the unstable wedge block increases significantly after installing the cable bolt support systems recommended by the empirical method.
    [Show full text]
  • Albany, New York, 2005
    Cover Photo by Joe Levinson: Paul Woodell taken in the Entrance to Jack Patricks Cave in Schoharie County, New York. It took first place as a color print in the 1997 print salon at the NSS National Convention in Sullivan Missouri. The camera was a Nikonous V with a 35mm lens using natural light on Professional Kodachrome 200 2005 NCKMS Staff Chairman Michael Warner [email protected] NCC Event Coordinator Emily Davis [email protected] CCH Treasurer Joe Levinson [email protected] NCC Abstract Coordinator Vince Kappler [email protected] NCC Facilities Aubrey Golden [email protected] MKC Field Trip Thom Engel [email protected] NCC Audio–Visual Jeff Bray [email protected] WVCC Bob Simmons [email protected] NCC Registration Liaison Ken Nichols [email protected] NCC Onsite Registration Karen Kastning [email protected] VA Cave Board Publicity Paul Steward [email protected] NCC Restaurants & Offsite Activities Christa Hay [email protected] NCC Exhibits Bob Addis [email protected] NCC Program Editor Amy Cox [email protected] NCC Proceedings Coordinator Steve Stokowski [email protected] Boston Grotto Proceedings Editor Tom Rea [email protected] NSS NCKRI Workshop Louise Hose [email protected] NCKRI Pat Seiser [email protected] NCKRI Bat Conservation Workshop Jim Kennedy [email protected] BCI Project Underground Workshop Carol Zokaites [email protected] PU Proceedings of the 2005 National Cave and Karst Management Symposium Albany, New York October 31 – November 4, 2005 Symposium Organizers Northeastern Cave Conservancy, Inc. Proceedings Coordinator Steve Stokowski Proceeding Editor G. Thomas Rea Layout and Design by Published by The NCKMS Steering Committee Cheryl Jones, Chairman Host Organization Northeastern Cave Conservancy, Inc.
    [Show full text]