DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Guide (Draft)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design Guide (Draft) ROCHE PARISH DESIGN GUIDE (DRAFT) CONTENTS Section 1: Introduction page 1 Section 2: Design Tasks page 3 KEY REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGN GUIDE Task 1 - Making a positive contribution towards character page 3 Task 2 - Appropriate building style page 3 Task 3 - Complementing and enhancing character page 4 ENSURE POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN VILLAGE AND COUNTRYSIDE Task 4 - Visual impact page 4 ACHIEVE HIGH QUALITY PUBIC SPACES Task 5 - A pleasant place to be page 5 REALISE HIGH QUALITY PLACE MAKING AND DESIGN Task 6 - A sense of place page 5 Task 7 - New building design page 6 Task 8 - Complementary materials page 6 Task 9 - A varied skyline page 7 Task 10 - Traditional roofing materials page 7 Task 11 - Appropriate building scale and setting page 8 Task 12 - Density of building page 8 Task 13 - Sustainable development page 8 Task 14 - Design of boundaries page 8 Task 15 - Design in the detail page 9 Task 16 - Appropriate car parking design page 9 Task 17 - Enhancing biodiversity page 10 Note 1 - Extensions page 10 Note 2 - Building conversions page 11 Section 3: Character Areas page 12 DISTINCTIVE AREAS OF CHARACTER IN ROCHE VILLAGE AND DESIGN DETAIL Churchtown/Glebe page 12 Fore Street page 14 The lower town page 15 Chapel Road/Tremodrett Lane page 17 BUILT ENVIRONMENT Public/ecclesiastical buildings page 18 Housing types page 19 Industrial, commercial and outbuildings page 20 Materials and local details page 22 LANDSCAPE SETTING, GREENERY AND OPEN SPACES page 23 VISTAS, VIEWS GLIMPSES AND STREETSCAPE page 24 INDUSTRIAL SIGNIFICANCE page 25 CONTENTS continued APPENDIX page 26 A HISTORY OF ROCHE Pre 1809 page 26 1809-41 page 28 1841-1880 page 29 1880-1906 page 32 1906-1946 page 33 Post 1946 page 34 TODAY page 34 DRAFT Roche Parish DESIGN GUIDE Section 1: Introduction SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION tantly inspired by, and expressive of, the best elements of local architecture traditions. OVERVIEW In order to fit in, new development should The people of Roche Parish have expressed respond to the local pattern of streets and concerns about the character, form and qual- spaces, follow the natural topography and ity of recent development and have stated a take account of traditional settlement form. desire to improve standards to the Roche New buildings should be neighbourly in terms Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group. Both of their scale, height, volume, how much of national and local planning policy recognise the site they occupy and the distance from, the importance of high quality design that and effect upon, adjacent buildings and land- responds to specific characteristics of the site, scape features. The plot coverage of buildings area and wider settings. should be appropriate to their scale and pro- vide adequate garden space, while distances There was particular concern expressed from other buildings should maintain ade- about unsympathetic patterns and loca- quate standards of privacy and daylight. tion of recent development, i.e. new housing estates that have detracted New buildings should express locally distinc- from the character of Roche Village, and tive building traditions, materials, character failed to respect historic patterns and and identity. That is not to say that all build- styles of development and especially ings should be the same or traditional in where these have detracted from the character but, by reference to these local de- setting of, and views from and to, the tails, new buildings should fit in and make a wider landscape and especially Roche positive contribution to their surroundings. Rock. There were strong feelings that new de- Community engagement is also important. velopment should ‘fit’ by being com- Fitting in is not simply about the physical plementary in character, form and qual- character and structure of the development. ity to the older more traditional parts of Development that has involved the public and the community, and that it should aspire engendered a sense of ‘ownership’ is more to the same quality of design and con- likely to be respected and cared for by the struction quality as found in the historic community. core area. There was special concern about the im- The Guide follows Government advice and pact further new development might supports strategic and local planning policies have on much valued views of Roche which seek to encourage new development Rock and the Church that has regard to the character and appeal of There was strong support for the view its locality and provides a good quality envi- ronment for those who live and work in the that any new development should re- spect and be sympathetic to the wider area. landscape and setting of the Parish and existing communities. The objectives and arising tasks and policies detailed in this design guide section provide In sum, the community expressed growing direction and guidance to owners, developers concern to the Roche Neighbourhood Plan and all involved in the planning, design and Steering Group that the character and special development of sites contained within the qualities that make Roche Parish distinctive Neighbourhood Plan Area and on any ‘wind- and attractive are being eroded by standard- fall’ sites not identified within the plan. They ised new development which pays little or no should be read with the policies and guidance respect to its location. Through sensitive de- contained in the Cornwall Local Plan and sign, and taking into account the local con- other related policies, to inform design that text, new development can be sympathetic to complements and enhances the character, the ‘grain’ of the landscape and most impor- form and qualities of Roche Parish. It is not 1 DRAFT Roche Parish DESIGN GUIDE Section 1: Introduction intended to be restrictive, but to inform the design process. “Good design enhances existing places and reinforces the underlying character of a place. It makes a positive contribution to its setting – whether landscape or townscape. While there are a wide range of building and landscape typologies in Cornwall, each is distinctive. Good design reflects this diver- sity. Distinctiveness in part is about under- standing the tradition, learning from it, and reinterpreting it for today.” A Design State- ment for Cornwall, 2001 2 DRAFT Roche Parish DESIGN GUIDE Section 2: Design Tasks SECTION 2: DESIGN TASKS should not be an excuse for further extending poor quality and unsympathetic development KEY REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGN approaches. GUIDE Development must contribute to the charac- ter of Roche Parish as a whole, incorporating Development complements and en- design principles that reflect the historic hances the character, form and quali- qualities of the community. In Roche this ties of Roche Parish, and Roche Village should especially reflect the historic core of in particular. the village. This policy does not seek to impose a particu- TASK 1 lar architectural style, instead it aims to en- sure that new development relates to specific Making a positive contribution towards local context, character and form. Different areas within the village and the parish have character different characteristics, each with their own local strengths and weaknesses, with the his- Development must make a positive contri- toric areas being the most cherished for their bution towards the distinctive character character and form of development. There- and form of the parish as a whole and fore development proposals must respond to Roche village in particular, especially the the unique character of the site and its sur- older parts of the village, and relate well roundings, maintaining or enhancing its to its site and its surroundings, especially strengths, and seeking to address its weak- views from and to Roche Rock and the nesses. Church. TASK 2 Appropriate building style Building style must be appropriate to the context, but not use recent poorer devel- opment as an excuse not to achieve excel- lent design quality drawing on the best of the Parish as a whole. Buildings within Roche Parish historically Fig 2.1 Recent developments have encroached on were typically simple, of good proportion Roche Rock with little regard for its historic setting and in harmony with their environment, Roche village, where most development will built to withstand the extremes of climate be centred, is an ancient community with a or ground conditions. In general, building distinct character, form and qualities. The forms should be simple and draw inspira- design of new development must be framed tion from local building traditions. within the context of the community’s unique setting and history and supporting Roche’s The historic character of Roche Parish is rich evident sense of community. The same ap- and varied, particularly reflecting the incre- plies throughout the parish - design of any mental development of the area. The design new development must be complementary to of new buildings should reflect the richness of its surroundings, drawing upon, and inspired character and form of the historic areas. by, its unique assets - but importantly neighbouring poor quality development 3 DRAFT Roche Parish DESIGN GUIDE Section 2: Design Tasks The Design and Access Statement must in- clude an appraisal of the site in its immediate surroundings and identify the opportunities and constraints for development and design. Applications must explain clearly and con- cisely how the proposals have been informed and influenced by this appraisal. The layout of buildings and access needs to reflect local patterns in order to ‘fit in’ effec- tively and to be responsive to the characteris- Fig 2.2 Buildings within Roche Parish historically tics of the site and its setting. were of simple design and proportion, built to with- stand the extremes of climate and ground conditions For small scale development pre-application engagement should be sought with the Parish The quality of design must, therefore, ensure Council and Cornwall Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Landscape Character Study
    CORNWALL AND ISLES OF SCILLY LANDSCAPE CHARACTER STUDY Landscape Character Area Description LCA - St Austell or Hensbarrow China Clay Area. LCA No CA17 JCA Constituent LDUs Total 4: 298, 409, 410, 411 © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Cornwall County Council 100019590, 2008. Location Inland area to the north-west of St Austell and bounded by the road network which stretches from Indian Queens on the west (B3275) via St Dennis in the north (B3279) to the A391 in the east (Penwithick) and the A3058 in the south, where it abuts the urban area of St Austell. Designations No AONB; SSSIs in LDUs 298,409, 411. 3 LDUs contain SACs; 3 contain SMs and there is 1 CGS site. Description A very varied, dramatic landscape of china clay waste tips and areas of rough vegetation, characterised by open pit mining. The mix of active and disused sites creates a dramatic ‘lunar’ landscape of huge, light- coloured waste tips and settling ponds within a relic pastoral farming landscape. A rugged area of great variation and drama. Dominant visual elements include the large white spoil heaps, either conical or flat- topped in form, aqua-blue pools, areas of rough ground and natural and naturally regenerated scrub and heath, as well as large quarry pits. The scale of these features contrasts dramatically with the small scale field patterns. The fluctuating and changing condition and relationship of elements in this landscape, and the natural regeneration of heathland, new woodland planting and rough ground provides a vivid and dynamic visual landscape character quite unlike surrounding LCAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornish Archaeology 41–42 Hendhyscans Kernow 2002–3
    © 2006, Cornwall Archaeological Society CORNISH ARCHAEOLOGY 41–42 HENDHYSCANS KERNOW 2002–3 EDITORS GRAEME KIRKHAM AND PETER HERRING (Published 2006) CORNWALL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY © 2006, Cornwall Archaeological Society © COPYRIGHT CORNWALL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2006 No part of this volume may be reproduced without permission of the Society and the relevant author ISSN 0070 024X Typesetting, printing and binding by Arrowsmith, Bristol © 2006, Cornwall Archaeological Society Contents Preface i HENRIETTA QUINNELL Reflections iii CHARLES THOMAS An Iron Age sword and mirror cist burial from Bryher, Isles of Scilly 1 CHARLES JOHNS Excavation of an Early Christian cemetery at Althea Library, Padstow 80 PRU MANNING and PETER STEAD Journeys to the Rock: archaeological investigations at Tregarrick Farm, Roche 107 DICK COLE and ANDY M JONES Chariots of fire: symbols and motifs on recent Iron Age metalwork finds in Cornwall 144 ANNA TYACKE Cornwall Archaeological Society – Devon Archaeological Society joint symposium 2003: 149 archaeology and the media PETER GATHERCOLE, JANE STANLEY and NICHOLAS THOMAS A medieval cross from Lidwell, Stoke Climsland 161 SAM TURNER Recent work by the Historic Environment Service, Cornwall County Council 165 Recent work in Cornwall by Exeter Archaeology 194 Obituary: R D Penhallurick 198 CHARLES THOMAS © 2006, Cornwall Archaeological Society © 2006, Cornwall Archaeological Society Preface This double-volume of Cornish Archaeology marks the start of its fifth decade of publication. Your Editors and General Committee considered this milestone an appropriate point to review its presentation and initiate some changes to the style which has served us so well for the last four decades. The genesis of this style, with its hallmark yellow card cover, is described on a following page by our founding Editor, Professor Charles Thomas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Cornwall Council Planning Carrick House Pydar Street Truro TR1
    Cornwall Council Planning Unit 2A 2B Bess Park Road Carrick House Trenant Industrial Estate Pydar Street Wadebridge Truro Cornwall TR1 1EB PL27 6HB 29/03/2021 Tel: 01208 895576 ext. 400 Our ref: CE3405 – PR3758 To whom it may concern, Request for a formal EIA screening opinion for the erection of a single wind turbine, up to 135m to tip, on Imerys land, Land at East Karslake, Cornwall, PL26 7XS. CleanEarth (CE) are proposing to submit a planning application for a single turbine development on land at East Karslake, Imerys, Cornwall, PL26 7XS. CE seeks to gain a formal screening opinion and formal pre-planning consultee comments for this site. The provisional turbine locations are shown in drawings CE3405-SC-TL-01 and CE3405-SC-SL-01. CE has provided a detailed description of the project and evaluated this against Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regulations to support our screening request. 1. The Development The proposal is to install a single turbine of maximum tip height 135m, with a 3-bladed rotor design. Due to constant industry developments, the turbine model has yet to be finalised. Supplementary elements include two permanent switchgear housing units (approx. 4m x 4m x 3m), temporary access track, underground cabling, and temporary crane hard standing area (approx. 45m x 65m). CE looks to develop sites that have reduced environmental impacts considering proximity, noise and visual amenity to ‘sensitive receptors’ (residential dwellings), ecological constraints, existing infrastructure, and locally designated areas and features. 1.1 Installation The turbine and other components would be delivered to the site by an articulated lorry.
    [Show full text]
  • LINKINHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN (Working Draft)
    Linkinhorne NDP Draft 2v Sept17 LINKINHORNE NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN (working draft) 1 Linkinhorne NDP Draft 2v Sept17 Contents 2. FOREWORD AND VISION ......................................................................................... 4 3. PLANNING CONTEXT: .............................................................................................. 6 5. POLICIES ...................................................................................................................... 7 6. General Policies: ............................................................................................................ 8 6.1. Policy GP1 - Sustainable Development: .............................................................. 8 6.2. Policy GP2 - Settlement Boundaries: .................................................................. 8 Henwood Village Boundary .......................................................................................... 9 Minions Village Boundary ............................................................................................. 9 Rilla Mill Village Boundary ........................................................................................ 10 Upton Cross Village Boundary draft pending site selection ........................................ 10 6.3. Policy GP3 - Redevelopment Involving Demolition of Buildings: ................... 10 7. New development: ................................................................................................. 11 7.1. Policy H1 - Integration of new development:
    [Show full text]
  • Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management
    Appendix A - Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has overall responsibility for flood risk management in England. Their aim is to reduce flood risk by: • discouraging inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. • encouraging adequate and cost effective flood warning systems. • encouraging adequate technically, environmentally and economically sound and sustainable flood defence measures. The Government’s Foresight Programme has recently produced a report called Future Flooding, which warns that the risk of flooding will increase between 2 and 20 times over the next 75 years. The report produced by the Office of Science and Technology has a long-term vision for the future (2030 – 2100), helping to make sure that effective strategies are developed now. Sir David King, the Chief Scientific Advisor to the Government concluded: “continuing with existing policies is not an option – in virtually every scenario considered (for climate change), the risks grow to unacceptable levels. Secondly, the risk needs to be tackled across a broad front. However, this is unlikely to be sufficient in itself. Hard choices need to be taken – we must either invest in more sustainable approaches to flood and coastal management or learn to live with increasing flooding”. In response to this, Defra is leading the development of a new strategy for flood and coastal erosion for the next 20 years. This programme, called “Making Space for Water” will help define and set the agenda for the Government’s future strategic approach to flood risk. Within this strategy there will be an overall approach to the assessing options through a strong and continuing commitment to CFMPs and SMPs within a broader planning framework which will include River Basin Management Plans prepared under the Water Framework Directive and Integrated Coastal Zone Management.
    [Show full text]
  • CORNWALL. FAR 425 Hicks Osbert, St
    TRADES DIRECIORY.] CORNWALL. FAR 425 Hicks Osbert, St. Agnes, Penzance Hoar Mrs. Thomas, Penquite,Lanlivery, Hocking Thomas, Treskellard, Redruth Hicks Richard, Tregaminion & Trill, Lost-withiel Hocking T.R.Tregullas,TheLizardR.S.O Tywardreath, Par Station R.S. 0 Ho:~.r Mrs. William, Pencrowde, Men- Hocking William, Arrowan downs, St. Hicks Robert, Hallivick, St. Stephen's- heniot, Liskeard Keverne R.S.O in-Brannell, Grampound Road Roar W. Trevollard, St.Stephen's,Saltsh Hocking William, Brightor, Landrake, Hicks R. Tregamhoe, Sancreed, Penzance HoareE. Kingbear, X orthHill, Launceston St. Germans R. S. 0 Hicks Stephen, St. Agnes, Penzance Hoare John, Dunsley, Linkinhorne, Hocking William, Gurland, St. Just4 Hicks Mrs. Tabitha, Gooseford, St. Callington R.S.O in-Penwith R.S.O Dominick, St. Mellion R.S.O HoareR.Lowly bridge, Lezant,Launcstn Hocking William, Kelynack, St. Just- HicksT.Church st.Mevagissey,St.Austell Hoare Samuel, Newland, Linkinhorne, in-Penwith R.S.O Hicks T. Perup pa.Mevagissey,St.Austell Callington R.S.O Hocking William, Pensilva, Liskeard Hicks Thomas, Tregamere, St. Columb Hoare William Martin, Trewanta, Le- Hocking William, Tregerthen, Zennor, Major R.S.O wannick, Launceston St. Ives R.S.O Hicks Thomas, Trelion, St. Stephen's- Hobba Mrs. William, Tregrehan mills, Hocking William Henry, Berepper, in-Brannell, Grampound Road St. Blazey, Par Station R.S.O Gunwalloe, Helston Hicks Thomas, Tremellin, St.Erth,Hayle Hobbs John, Forda, Morwenstow, Strat- Hocking William John, Clahar,Mullion, Hicks Thomas Reed, Callington R.S.O ton R.S.O Cury Cross Lanes R.S.O Hicks William, Bokenver & Penirth, Hoblyn Richard, Fair street, St.
    [Show full text]
  • CARBINIDAE of CORNWALL Keith NA Alexander
    CARBINIDAE OF CORNWALL Keith NA Alexander PB 1 Family CARABIDAE Ground Beetles The RDB species are: The county list presently stands at 238 species which appear to have been reliably recorded, but this includes • Grasslands on free-draining soils, presumably maintained either by exposure or grazing: 6 which appear to be extinct in the county, at least three casual vagrants/immigrants, two introductions, Harpalus honestus – see extinct species above two synathropic (and presumed long-term introductions) and one recent colonist. That makes 229 resident • Open stony, sparsely-vegetated areas on free-draining soils presumably maintained either by exposure breeding species, of which about 63% (147) are RDB (8), Nationally Scarce (46) or rare in the county (93). or grazing: Ophonus puncticollis – see extinct species above Where a species has been accorded “Nationally Scarce” or “British Red Data Book” status this is shown • On dry sandy soils, usually on coast, presumably maintained by exposure or grazing: immediately following the scientific name. Ophonus sabulicola (Looe, VCH) The various categories are essentially as follows: • Open heath vegetation, generally maintained by grazing: Poecilus kugelanni – see BAP species above RDB - species which are only known in Britain from fewer than 16 of the 10km squares of the National Grid. • Unimproved flushed grass pastures with Devil’s-bit-scabious: • Category 1 Endangered - taxa in danger of extinction Lebia cruxminor (‘Bodmin Moor’, 1972 & Treneglos, 1844) • Category 2 Vulnerable - taxa believed
    [Show full text]
  • Kessedhek Rag Henwyn Tyller Ha Arwodhyow Place-Name and Signage Panel
    Kessedhek rag Henwyn Tyller ha Arwodhyow Place-name and Signage Panel Dydh / Date: 20 mis Meurth, 2015 / 27 March 2015, 10am. Le / Venue: Stevel/Room ??:??, Lys Kernow / County Hall, Truru / Truro. AGENDA / ROL NEGYS 1. Diharasow / Apologies 2. Kovnotyansow / Minutes 3. Materow ow sordya / Matters arising 4. Arwodhow yn stret / Street signs Outstanding translations 5. Henwyn leow / Place names a) Rol Henwyn Tyller – S. Austel 6. Towlen – Taves an Tir 7. Negys aral / Any Other Business 8. Dydh an kuntelles nessa / Date of Next Meeting – TBA Paperow a vern / Background papers Kovnotyansow kuntelles a veu synsys 20/02/2015 / Minutes of the meeting held 20/02/2015 – Previously circulated Rol Henwyn Stret Gesys – Update to be circulated. Ober A-dheu / Future Work Finish Parishes Towlen Taves an Tir Complete names on OS 1:250,000 map. KESKOWETHYANS AN TAVES KERNEWEK CORNISH LANGUAGE PARTNERSHIP KESSEDHEK ARWODHYOW HA HENWYN-LE SIGNAGE AND PLACENAME PANEL Kovnotyansow an kuntelles synsys: dy’Gwener 27 mis Meurth 2015 th Draft Minutes of the meeting held: Friday 27 March 2015 Present: N Meek (Chair), K George, R Lyon, J Edmondson, L Jenkin, J Holmes In attendance: P Hodge, S Rogerson No. Item Action 1. Diharesow / Apologies None 2. Kovnotyansow / Minutes The minutes of the meeting on Friday 20th February 2015 were read and agreed pending the following amendment: Page 2 – The translation of Countess Bridge should have read Pons Yurles not Pols Yurles. 3. Materow ow sordya / Matters arising Nanjizal (St Levan) [settlement] = Nansisel It was unknown whether the settlement or the bay was named first, but there was a suggestion that the naming sequence could have been valley > settlement > bay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bryophytes of Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly
    THE BRYOPHYTES OF CORNWALL AND THE ISLES OF SCILLY by David T. Holyoak Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 3 Scope and aims .......................................................................... 3 Coverage and treatment of old records ...................................... 3 Recording since 1993 ................................................................ 5 Presentation of data ................................................................... 6 NOTES ON SPECIES .......................................................................... 8 Introduction and abbreviations ................................................. 8 Hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) ................................................. 15 Liverworts (Marchantiophyta) ................................................. 17 Mosses (Bryophyta) ................................................................. 98 COASTAL INFLUENCES ON BRYOPHYTE DISTRIBUTION ..... 348 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN BRYOPHYTE DISTRIBUTION ..... 367 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................ 394 1 Acknowledgements Mrs Jean A. Paton MBE is thanked for use of records, gifts and checking of specimens, teaching me to identify liverworts, and expertise freely shared. Records have been used from the Biological Records Centre (Wallingford): thanks are due to Dr M.O. Hill and Dr C.D. Preston for
    [Show full text]
  • Edited by IJ Bennallick & DA Pearman
    BOTANICAL CORNWALL 2010 No. 14 Edited by I.J. Bennallick & D.A. Pearman BOTANICAL CORNWALL No. 14 Edited by I.J.Bennallick & D.A.Pearman ISSN 1364 - 4335 © I.J. Bennallick & D.A. Pearman 2010 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. Published by - the Environmental Records Centre for Cornwall & the Isles of Scilly (ERCCIS) based at the- Cornwall Wildlife Trust Five Acres, Allet, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 9DJ Tel: (01872) 273939 Fax: (01872) 225476 Website: www.erccis.co.uk and www.cornwallwildlifetrust.org.uk Cover photo: Perennial Centaury Centaurium scilloides at Gwennap Head, 2010. © I J Bennallick 2 Contents Introduction - I. J. Bennallick & D. A. Pearman 4 A new dandelion - Taraxacum ronae - and its distribution in Cornwall - L. J. Margetts 5 Recording in Cornwall 2006 to 2009 – C. N. French 9 Fitch‟s Illustrations of the British Flora – C. N. French 15 Important Plant Areas – C. N. French 17 The decline of Illecebrum verticillatum – D. A. Pearman 22 Bryological Field Meetings 2006 – 2007 – N. de Sausmarez 29 Centaurium scilloides, Juncus subnodulosus and Phegopteris connectilis rediscovered in Cornwall after many years – I. J. Bennallick 36 Plant records for Cornwall up to September 2009 – I. J. Bennallick 43 Plant records and update from the Isles of Scilly 2006 – 2009 – R. E. Parslow 93 3 Introduction We can only apologise for the very long gestation of this number. There is so much going on in the Cornwall botanical world – a New Red Data Book, an imminent Fern Atlas, plans for a new Flora and a Rare Plant Register, plus masses of fieldwork, most notably for Natural England for rare plants on SSSIs, that somehow this publication has kept on being put back as other more urgent tasks vie for precedence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cornish Way an Forth Kernewek
    Map The Cornish Way An Forth Kernewek Consideration for Others Care for the Environment • Follow the Highway Code. • Leave your car at home if possible. Can you reach the start of your journey by bike or public transport? • Please be courteous to other users, and do not give the ‘The Cornish Way’ and its users a bad name. • Follow the Countryside Code. In particular: take litter home with you; keep to the routes provided and • Give way to walkers and, where necessary, horses. shut any gates; leave wildlife, livestock, crops and Slow down when passing them! machinery alone; and make no unnecessary noise. • Warn other users of your presence, particularly when approaching from behind. Warn a horse with Contacts some distance to spare - ringing a bell or calling out a greeting will avoid frightening the horse. Cornwall Council www.cornwall.gov.uk/cornishway • Keep to the trails, roads, byways or tel: 0300 1234 202 and bridleways. www.nationalrail.co.uk • Do not ride or cycle on footpaths. www.sustrans.org.uk • Respect other land management industries such as www.visitcornwall.com farming and forestry. • Please park your bike considerately. © Cornwall Council 2012 Part of cycle network Lower Tamar Lake and Cycle Trail Bude Stratton Marhamchurch Widemouth Bay Devon Coast to Coast Trail Millbrook Week St Mary Wainhouse Corner Warbstow Trelash proposed Hallworthy Camel - Tarka Link Launceston Lower Tamar Lake and Cycle Trail Camelford National Cycle Network 2 3 32 Route Number 0 5 10 20 Bude Stratton Kilometres Regional Cycle Network 67 Marhamchurch
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Appraisal Report
    St. Austell Link Road Environmental Appraisal Report CORMAC Project number: 60571547 20th August 2020 St. Austell Link Road Full Business Case Project number: 60571547 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Sarah Roberts Steffan Shageer Alison Morrissy Graduate Environmental Principal Environmental Associate Director Consultant Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 1 20/06/19 Template Y SS Principal 2 11/07/09 FINAL Y AM Associate 3 20/08/20 FINAL Y SS Principal 4 Prepared for: CORMAC AECOM 1 St. Austell Link Road Full Business Case Project number: 60571547 Prepared for: CORMAC Prepared by: AECOM Limited Plumer House Third Floor, East Wing Tailyour Road Crownhill Plymouth PL6 5DH United Kingdom T: +44 (1752) 676700 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: CORMAC AECOM 2 St. Austell Link Road Full Business Case Project number: 60571547 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]