DOCSLIB.ORG

4.15 C3 Appraisal Specification Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.15 C3 Appraisal Specification Report REPORT NO 70024617/ASR A30 TO ST AUSTELL LINK APPRAISAL SPECIFICATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 A30 TO ST AUSTELL LINK APPRAISAL SPECIFICATION REPORT Final Draft Project no: 70024617 Date: November 2016 – WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff 11 High Cross, Truro, TR1 2AJ Tel: 01872 245860 www.wsp-pb.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Final Draft including Remarks Internal Draft Final Draft CORMAC comment Date 19 October 2016 28/10/2016 03/11/16 Prepared by Niall Parkinson Rob Hayward Rob Hayward Signature Checked by Rob Hayward Thea Wattam Thea Wattam Signature Authorised by Rob Hayward Thea Wattam Ian Beavis Signature Project number 70024617 70024617 70024617 Report number 1 1 1 File reference http://my.hdle.it/50230786 ii PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT Team Leader – Transport Rick Clayton Planning and Feasibility WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Senior Transportation Planner Rob Hayward Principal Transportation Planner Thea Wattam Technical Director Ian Beavis Environmental Consultant Claire Beard SUBCONSULTANTS Modelling Project Manager – Joanna Isaac PTV A30 to St Austell Link – Appraisal Specification Report WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff CORMAC Project No 70024617 November 2016 Confidential 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 CURRENT PROJECT STAGE ..................................................................... 6 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL SPECIFICATION REPORT ....................... 8 1.4 OVERALL PROJECT PROGRAMME........................................................... 8 1.5 SCHEME OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 9 1.6 STAKEHOLDERS ..................................................................................... 10 1.7 EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION ................................................. 10 2 TRANSPORT MODELLING.............................................................. 11 2.1 EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND DATA........................................................ 11 2.2 SCALE OF IMPACT .................................................................................. 13 2.3 TRAFFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SURVEY APPROACH.................. 13 2.4 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 21 2.5 SUMMARY OF THE RELEVANT AREA OF THE COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY .............................................................. 30 2.6 WORK PROGRAMME............................................................................... 30 2.7 RISKS ...................................................................................................... 30 2.8 CHANGE LOG .......................................................................................... 30 2.9 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 30 3 ECONOMY ........................................................................................... 32 3.1 EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND DATA........................................................ 32 3.2 TOPIC-RELATED CONSTRAINTS ............................................................. 32 3.3 SCALE OF IMPACT .................................................................................. 32 3.4 TRAFFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SURVEY APPROACH.................. 32 3.5 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 32 A30 to St Austell Link WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff CORMAC Project No 70024617 Confidential November 2016 2 3.6 SUMMARY OF THE RELEVANT AREA OF THE COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY .............................................................. 47 3.7 WORK PROGRAMME............................................................................... 47 3.8 RISKS ...................................................................................................... 47 3.9 CHANGE LOG .......................................................................................... 47 3.10 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 48 4 OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT ...................................................... 49 4.1 EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND DATA........................................................ 49 4.2 TOPIC-RELATED CONSTRAINTS ............................................................. 49 4.3 SCALE OF IMPACT .................................................................................. 49 4.4 TRAFFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SURVEY APPROACH.................. 49 4.5 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 49 4.6 SUMMARY OF THE RELEVANT AREA OF THE COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY .............................................................. 50 4.7 WORK PROGRAMME............................................................................... 50 4.8 RISKS ...................................................................................................... 50 4.9 CHANGE LOG .......................................................................................... 50 4.10 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 50 5 ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 51 5.1 EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND DATA........................................................ 51 5.2 TOPIC RELATED CONSTRAINTS............................................................. 51 5.3 SCALE OF IMPACT .................................................................................. 51 5.4 TRAFFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SURVEY APPROACH.................. 51 5.5 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 52 5.6 SUMMARY OF RELEVANT AREAS OF COMMUNICATION STRATEGY .............................................................................................. 55 5.7 WORK PROGRAMME............................................................................... 55 5.8 RISKS ...................................................................................................... 56 5.9 CHANGE LOG .......................................................................................... 56 A30 to St Austell Link WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff CORMAC Project No 70024617 Confidential November 2016 3 5.10 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 56 6 SOCIAL IMPACTS ............................................................................. 57 6.1 EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND DATA........................................................ 57 6.2 TOPIC RELATED CONSTRAINTS............................................................. 57 6.3 SCALE OF IMPACT .................................................................................. 57 6.4 TRAFFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS AND SURVEY APPROACH.................. 57 6.5 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 57 6.6 SUMMARY OF THE RELEVANT AREAS OF THE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY ................................................................ 59 6.7 WORK PROGRAMME............................................................................... 59 6.8 RISKS ...................................................................................................... 59 6.9 CHANGE LOG .......................................................................................... 60 6.10 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 60 7 PUBLIC ACCOUNTS – COST TO BROAD TRANSPORT BUDGET .................................................................... 61 7.1 LEVEL OF DESIGN FEEDING INTO COSTS.............................................. 62 7.2 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 62 7.3 INVESTMENT COSTS............................................................................... 62 7.4 OPERATING COSTS ................................................................................ 63 7.5 OPERATING, MAINTENANCE AND RENEWAL COSTS ............................ 63 7.6 TREATMENT OF RISK.............................................................................. 63 7.7 CALCULATION OF INDIRECT TAX REVENUES ....................................... 63 7.8 COMMUNICATION STRATEGY ................................................................ 63 7.9 WORK PROGRAMME............................................................................... 63 7.10 RISKS ...................................................................................................... 64 TABLES TABLE 1-1 PROJECT TIMESCALES. .......................................................................... 8 TABLE 2-1 SUITABLE MODELS ............................................................................... 12 A30 to St Austell Link WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff CORMAC Project No 70024617 Confidential November 2016 4 TABLE 2-2 RSI SURVEY LOCATIONS AND DATES .................................................. 13 TABLE 2-3 A30 RSI SURVEYS ................................................................................. 13 TABLE 2-4 LOCATIONS OF AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC COUNTS (ATCS). ...................... 15 TABLE 2-5 MCC LOCATIONS AND DA TE UNDERTAKEN. ........................................ 17 TABLE 2-6 ANPR LOCATIONS ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Landscape Character Study
    CORNWALL AND ISLES OF SCILLY LANDSCAPE CHARACTER STUDY Landscape Character Area Description LCA - St Austell or Hensbarrow China Clay Area. LCA No CA17 JCA Constituent LDUs Total 4: 298, 409, 410, 411 © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Cornwall County Council 100019590, 2008. Location Inland area to the north-west of St Austell and bounded by the road network which stretches from Indian Queens on the west (B3275) via St Dennis in the north (B3279) to the A391 in the east (Penwithick) and the A3058 in the south, where it abuts the urban area of St Austell. Designations No AONB; SSSIs in LDUs 298,409, 411. 3 LDUs contain SACs; 3 contain SMs and there is 1 CGS site. Description A very varied, dramatic landscape of china clay waste tips and areas of rough vegetation, characterised by open pit mining. The mix of active and disused sites creates a dramatic ‘lunar’ landscape of huge, light- coloured waste tips and settling ponds within a relic pastoral farming landscape. A rugged area of great variation and drama. Dominant visual elements include the large white spoil heaps, either conical or flat- topped in form, aqua-blue pools, areas of rough ground and natural and naturally regenerated scrub and heath, as well as large quarry pits. The scale of these features contrasts dramatically with the small scale field patterns. The fluctuating and changing condition and relationship of elements in this landscape, and the natural regeneration of heathland, new woodland planting and rough ground provides a vivid and dynamic visual landscape character quite unlike surrounding LCAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Guide (Draft)
    ROCHE PARISH DESIGN GUIDE (DRAFT) CONTENTS Section 1: Introduction page 1 Section 2: Design Tasks page 3 KEY REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGN GUIDE Task 1 - Making a positive contribution towards character page 3 Task 2 - Appropriate building style page 3 Task 3 - Complementing and enhancing character page 4 ENSURE POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN VILLAGE AND COUNTRYSIDE Task 4 - Visual impact page 4 ACHIEVE HIGH QUALITY PUBIC SPACES Task 5 - A pleasant place to be page 5 REALISE HIGH QUALITY PLACE MAKING AND DESIGN Task 6 - A sense of place page 5 Task 7 - New building design page 6 Task 8 - Complementary materials page 6 Task 9 - A varied skyline page 7 Task 10 - Traditional roofing materials page 7 Task 11 - Appropriate building scale and setting page 8 Task 12 - Density of building page 8 Task 13 - Sustainable development page 8 Task 14 - Design of boundaries page 8 Task 15 - Design in the detail page 9 Task 16 - Appropriate car parking design page 9 Task 17 - Enhancing biodiversity page 10 Note 1 - Extensions page 10 Note 2 - Building conversions page 11 Section 3: Character Areas page 12 DISTINCTIVE AREAS OF CHARACTER IN ROCHE VILLAGE AND DESIGN DETAIL Churchtown/Glebe page 12 Fore Street page 14 The lower town page 15 Chapel Road/Tremodrett Lane page 17 BUILT ENVIRONMENT Public/ecclesiastical buildings page 18 Housing types page 19 Industrial, commercial and outbuildings page 20 Materials and local details page 22 LANDSCAPE SETTING, GREENERY AND OPEN SPACES page 23 VISTAS, VIEWS GLIMPSES AND STREETSCAPE page 24 INDUSTRIAL SIGNIFICANCE page 25 CONTENTS continued APPENDIX page 26 A HISTORY OF ROCHE Pre 1809 page 26 1809-41 page 28 1841-1880 page 29 1880-1906 page 32 1906-1946 page 33 Post 1946 page 34 TODAY page 34 DRAFT Roche Parish DESIGN GUIDE Section 1: Introduction SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION tantly inspired by, and expressive of, the best elements of local architecture traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Cornwall Council Planning Carrick House Pydar Street Truro TR1
    Cornwall Council Planning Unit 2A 2B Bess Park Road Carrick House Trenant Industrial Estate Pydar Street Wadebridge Truro Cornwall TR1 1EB PL27 6HB 29/03/2021 Tel: 01208 895576 ext. 400 Our ref: CE3405 – PR3758 To whom it may concern, Request for a formal EIA screening opinion for the erection of a single wind turbine, up to 135m to tip, on Imerys land, Land at East Karslake, Cornwall, PL26 7XS. CleanEarth (CE) are proposing to submit a planning application for a single turbine development on land at East Karslake, Imerys, Cornwall, PL26 7XS. CE seeks to gain a formal screening opinion and formal pre-planning consultee comments for this site. The provisional turbine locations are shown in drawings CE3405-SC-TL-01 and CE3405-SC-SL-01. CE has provided a detailed description of the project and evaluated this against Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regulations to support our screening request. 1. The Development The proposal is to install a single turbine of maximum tip height 135m, with a 3-bladed rotor design. Due to constant industry developments, the turbine model has yet to be finalised. Supplementary elements include two permanent switchgear housing units (approx. 4m x 4m x 3m), temporary access track, underground cabling, and temporary crane hard standing area (approx. 45m x 65m). CE looks to develop sites that have reduced environmental impacts considering proximity, noise and visual amenity to ‘sensitive receptors’ (residential dwellings), ecological constraints, existing infrastructure, and locally designated areas and features. 1.1 Installation The turbine and other components would be delivered to the site by an articulated lorry.
    [Show full text]
  • Kessedhek Rag Henwyn Tyller Ha Arwodhyow Place-Name and Signage Panel
    Kessedhek rag Henwyn Tyller ha Arwodhyow Place-name and Signage Panel Dydh / Date: 20 mis Meurth, 2015 / 27 March 2015, 10am. Le / Venue: Stevel/Room ??:??, Lys Kernow / County Hall, Truru / Truro. AGENDA / ROL NEGYS 1. Diharasow / Apologies 2. Kovnotyansow / Minutes 3. Materow ow sordya / Matters arising 4. Arwodhow yn stret / Street signs Outstanding translations 5. Henwyn leow / Place names a) Rol Henwyn Tyller – S. Austel 6. Towlen – Taves an Tir 7. Negys aral / Any Other Business 8. Dydh an kuntelles nessa / Date of Next Meeting – TBA Paperow a vern / Background papers Kovnotyansow kuntelles a veu synsys 20/02/2015 / Minutes of the meeting held 20/02/2015 – Previously circulated Rol Henwyn Stret Gesys – Update to be circulated. Ober A-dheu / Future Work Finish Parishes Towlen Taves an Tir Complete names on OS 1:250,000 map. KESKOWETHYANS AN TAVES KERNEWEK CORNISH LANGUAGE PARTNERSHIP KESSEDHEK ARWODHYOW HA HENWYN-LE SIGNAGE AND PLACENAME PANEL Kovnotyansow an kuntelles synsys: dy’Gwener 27 mis Meurth 2015 th Draft Minutes of the meeting held: Friday 27 March 2015 Present: N Meek (Chair), K George, R Lyon, J Edmondson, L Jenkin, J Holmes In attendance: P Hodge, S Rogerson No. Item Action 1. Diharesow / Apologies None 2. Kovnotyansow / Minutes The minutes of the meeting on Friday 20th February 2015 were read and agreed pending the following amendment: Page 2 – The translation of Countess Bridge should have read Pons Yurles not Pols Yurles. 3. Materow ow sordya / Matters arising Nanjizal (St Levan) [settlement] = Nansisel It was unknown whether the settlement or the bay was named first, but there was a suggestion that the naming sequence could have been valley > settlement > bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Appraisal Report
    St. Austell Link Road Environmental Appraisal Report CORMAC Project number: 60571547 20th August 2020 St. Austell Link Road Full Business Case Project number: 60571547 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Sarah Roberts Steffan Shageer Alison Morrissy Graduate Environmental Principal Environmental Associate Director Consultant Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 1 20/06/19 Template Y SS Principal 2 11/07/09 FINAL Y AM Associate 3 20/08/20 FINAL Y SS Principal 4 Prepared for: CORMAC AECOM 1 St. Austell Link Road Full Business Case Project number: 60571547 Prepared for: CORMAC Prepared by: AECOM Limited Plumer House Third Floor, East Wing Tailyour Road Crownhill Plymouth PL6 5DH United Kingdom T: +44 (1752) 676700 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: CORMAC AECOM 2 St. Austell Link Road Full Business Case Project number: 60571547 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Specification Report
    O REPORT N 70024617/ASR A30 TO ST AUSTELL LINK APPRAISAL SPECIFICATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 A30 TO ST AUSTELL LINK APPRAISAL SPECIFICATION REPORT Final Draft Project no: 70024617 Date: November 2016 – WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff 11 High Cross, Truro, TR1 2AJ Tel: 01872 245860 www.wsp-pb.com Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Final Draft including Remarks Internal Draft Final Draft CORMAC comment Date 19 October 2016 28/10/2016 03/11/16 Prepared by Niall Parkinson Rob Hayward Rob Hayward Signature Checked by Rob Hayward Thea Wattam Thea Wattam Signature Authorised by Rob Hayward Thea Wattam Ian Beavis Signature Project number 70024617 70024617 70024617 Report number 1 1 1 File reference http://my.hdle.it/50230786 ii P R O D U C T I O N T E A M CLIENT Team Leader – Transport Rick Clayton Planning and Feasibility WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Senior Transportation Planner Rob Hayward Principal Transportation Planner Thea Wattam Technical Director Ian Beavis Environmental Consultant Claire Beard SUBCONSULTANTS Modelling Project Manager – Joanna Isaac PTV A30 to St Austell Link – Appraisal Specification Report WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff CORMAC Project No 70024617 November 2016 Confidential 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 CURRENT PROJECT STAGE ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society
    THE MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF THE MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY No. 902 September, 1948 Vol. XXVIII On rashleighite, a new mineral from Cornwall, inter- mediate between turquoise and chalcosiderite. By Sir ARTHUR RUSSELL, Bart. [Read March 11, 1937.] HE mineral here described was at first considered to be an iron-rich T variety of turquoise and was described by myself as such when this paper was read before the Society in 1937. At that time only a partial analysis had been made ; since then Dr. J. A. Smythe of King's College, Newcast[e-upon-Tyne, has most kindly undertaken at my instigation careful analyses of the mineral from both of its localities, Bunny mine, St. Austell, and Castle-an-Dinas wolfram mine, St. Columb Major. As a result of these two analyses, which are in close agreement, it is evident that the mineral is a new one, intermediate between turquoise and the two minerals chalcosiderite and andrewsite, and forming a middle member of what is probably an isomorphous group. The name rashleighite commemorates Philip Rashleigh, F.R.S., F.G.S., F.S.A., 1729-1811, of Menabilly, Cornwall, one of the earliest of Cornish mineralogists and famous for having amassed the finest collection of Cornish minerals ever made. The table of analyses given below shows the relationships of the various members of the g~oup and their respective specific gravities. The crystal system to which these minerals belong has only been estab- lished in the case of turquoise and chalcosiderite which are triclinic. Henwoodite (Sp. gr. 2.67) would seem to belong to this group, but an examination of a series of specimens shows that it is apparently a mineral of variable composition and the sole analysis by J.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Section.Pmd
    Geoscience in south-west England SOME NOTABLE CORNISH BUILDING AND DECORATIVE STONES C.M. BRISTOW Bristow, C.M. 2001. Some notable Cornish building and decorative stones. Geoscience in south-west England, 10, 000-000. Arising mainly from its exceptionally varied suites of intrusive igneous rocks, Cornwall has a rich variety of building and decorative stones which were extensively exploited, both for local and export use, before concrete and brick came to dominate construction in the 20th century. Basic igneous rocks include a metabasic rock at Cataclews Point, west of Padstow, which provided the extremely durable Cataclews Stone from Norman times onwards; this was used extensively for medieval fonts and church carvings in North Cornwall. Polyphant Stone, formed by carbonatization of an ultrabasic intrusion, is composed of a mixture of talc, chlorite and various calcium and magnesium carbonates and the Polyphant quarry was recently reopened to supply stone for the rebuilding of Newquay parish church. Allied to Polyphant Stone is Duporth Stone, worked from the cliffs of Duporth Bay, south of St. Austell and used extensively in the pillars of Truro Cathedral. Granites were notably worked in the eastern part of the Carnmenellis Granite (mainly in Mabe parish), in the St. Austell Granite (Luxulyan, Carn Grey and the china stone areas) and on Bodmin Moor (De Lank, Hantergantick, Cheesewring, etc). A significant industry developed in the 19th and early 20th centuries, employing large numbers of skilled quarrymen, with granite exported world- wide. A tourmalinized granite, luxullianite, was an important decorative stone, used for example in the Duke of Wellington’s sarcophagus in St.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2020
    1 FROM YOUR OWN CORRESPONDENTS Updates from Cornwall Archaeological Society’s Area Representatives Any opinions or errors in these articles are those of the authors and must not be assumed to be those of Cornwall Archaeological Society. OCTOBER 2020 Issue 47 THIS MONTH’S FEATURES HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2020 AREA REPS ZOOM IN WESTERN SNIPPETS AROUND THE ROUND AT TRETHURGY HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2020 Photo: Peter Crispin Photo: Peter Crispin Trekelland Bridge (SX 3004 7984, Grade II* LB, South Petherwin parish) is an important part of our heritage and it is at risk from motor traffic. Following a tip-off from Robin Paris, Area Reps Peter Crispin and John Hanns visited it to assess the most recent damage and were rather discouraged by their findings. What can be done? Much could be achieved in a country that was prepared to back up noble words about heritage with proper funding. And this would also have a very positive impact on the economy. But the very first step must be to methodically identify the problems and this is what Historic England’s annual Heritage at Risk Registers do so well. All 2 of the latest registers can be obtained here: https://historicengland.org.uk/images- books/publications/har-2020-registers/ . What does the latest register tell us about Cornwall’s heritage? This is available here: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/har-2020-registers/sw-har- register2020/ . A higher percentage of archaeological Scheduled Monuments in the South West are at risk than in England as a whole (15% compared with 10.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Menydh and Other Cornish Words for 'Hill'
    MENYDH AND OTHER CORNISH WORDS FOR ‘HILL’ a discussion paper by Ken George 1 BACKGROUND The English word hill has several meanings, of which two are relevant here (meanings from Reader’s Digest Universal Dictionary ): 1) a well-defined, naturally elevated area of land smaller than a mountain; 2) an incline, especially on a road; a slope. I shall sometimes refer to (1) as “hill-top” and (2) as “hill-slope”. When translating street-names, it is desirable to distinguish these two meanings, by using different Cornish words. This paper considers which words might be used for this purpose. Three sources for such words and their meanings are considered: (a) place-names; (b) writings in traditional Cornish; (c) usage in Revived Cornish. We shall see that the evidence from these three sources is conflicting and difficult to reconcile. The following table shows the number of occurrences of various words for ‘high ground’ from sources (a) and (b). Word Number of occurrences places used(1) cited(2) ardh ~10 0 8 bre ~20 0 9 brenn ~8 0 1 bronn ~20 0 10 (3) drumm ~5 0 0 knegh 1 0 0 menydh >60 34 35 ros >70 0 14 run ~8 2 4 runenn 0 0 1 tolgh 0 0 0 (1) “Used” means used within a text (verse or prose), which implies that the word was used in common parlance. (2) “Cited” means quoted as an individual word in a word-list or a dictionary. (3) Only those cases where bronn meant ‘hill’ are counted, not those where it meant ‘breast’.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration and Tipping Strategy for the St Austell China Clay Area
    Information Classification: PUBLIC Restoration and Tipping Strategy for the St Austell China Clay area Supplementary Planning Document Draft March 2021 Planning & Sustainable Development Information Classification: PUBLIC Cornwall Council commissioned Wardell Armstrong LLP to undertake a review of the adopted Tipping and Restoration Strategy for the St Austell China Clay area. This draft Supplementary Planning Document is based on the final report prepared by Wardell Armstrong LPP and the Council would like to thank the consultants for their work in undertaking this review. This report has been prepared by Wardell Armstrong LLP with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the Contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client and Wardell Armstrong LLP accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of Wardell Armstrong LLP. PREPARED BY: Simon Williams Environmental Scientist & GIS Specialist David Gray Principal Landscape Architect Helen Simpson Associate Director APPROVED BY: David Brignall Director St Austell China Clay Restoration & Tipping Strategy Supplementary Planning Document DRAFT 2 March 2021 Information Classification: PUBLIC Contents 1 Supplementary Planning Document 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Introduction 12 3.1 Geology of China Clay 12 3.2 The Hensbarrow China Clay Area 12 3.3 Planning History 12 3.4 Current Levels of China Clay Production 13 3.5 Policy Context
    [Show full text]
  • Society-History-1926-Celebrations.Pdf
    THE MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE AND 30URNAL oF TKE ~{[NE R~kLOGIC ~kL SOCIETY. No. 115. December, 1926. Vol. XXI. MINERALOGICAL S(_)CIE~I u (Instituted Fehr,mry 3, 1876.) JUBILEE CELLBRATION (.~el,tem ,er, 1926.) CONTENTS Pak, o Page Preliminaries 9:) Addresses and Letters of Con- Programme. 100 gratulation . 134 Reception and Conversazionu I0[ List of Delegate~, Guests, and Dinner lO3 Members l 41 Visits to ]~].useunls and Institu- Lists of Officers of the Society tions 10l (,1876-1926) . 144 President's Add ross 106 List of IIonnrary Members (,1877- Southern Excursion 12,t 1:~26) 146 Nm'thern Excursion I'2S Photograph of Group (Plato If) . 148 Visit to Cambridge 133 COMMI'ITEE consisting of the President, Treasurer, Ger,eral A Secretary, Foreign Secretary, Editor, Prof. A. 1-[utchinson, Sit" Henry A. Miers, 3Jr. W. Campbell Smith, Dr. G. F. Herbert Smith, and Dr. H. H. Tllomas was appointed by the Council of the Society on November 3, 1925, to consider how the Jubilee of tile Society should be celebrated. This Committee, to which Dr. A. Brammall and Air. Arthur ~usscll were afterwards added, held several meetings. The General Secretary (Dr. G. T. Prior) had charge of the general arrangements, the Treasurer (Mr. F. N. Ashcroft) of the financial arraugements, the housing Ii 100 I~[INERALOGICAL SOCIETY--JUBILEE CELEB1RATIOI~ 1926. of the official guests, and the Dinner, Mr. W. Campbell Smith of the Conversazione, Prof. A. Hutchinson of the Northern Excursion, and Nr. Arthur Russell of the Southern Excursion. The special thanks of the Council and of the Society are due to these gentlemen for their work, which resulted in an unqualified success.
    [Show full text]