DOCSLIB.ORG

Watershed: Interim Report, August 1990

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Royal Commission on the .~ Commission royale sur Future of the. ~ I'avenir du Toronto Waterfront. secteur riverain de Toronto "'.ADA 0".,. Commissioner Commissaire The Honourable David Crombie, PC L'honorable David Crombie, cp Executive Director and Counsel Directeur executif et Conseilier juridique RonaldL Doering RonaldL. Doering TO illS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IN COUNCIL MAY IT PLEASEYOUR EXCELLENCY By Order in Council PC -1988 -589 dated March 30,1988, I was appointed Commissioner to inquire into and make recommendations regarding the future of the Toronto Waterfront. 1 now beg to submit the attachedReport. ' Respectfully submitted. (::::=~{::::-L~~,"A.A..A..~ David Crombie Commissioner August 1990 171, rue Slater St, 11th Fk)or/1 l' etage 207 OJeen.s Quay West/Ouest .5th Floor /Soetage PO. Box/CP 1527 PO Box/ CP 4111 Station/ Succursaie "8" Station/ Succursaie "A" Ottawa, Canada K1P 6P5 Toronto. Canada MSW 2V4 Tel No/No de tei~phone (613) 990-3306 Tel No/No de t~lephone (416) 973-7185 Fax No/No de facslmll~ (613) 990-4345 Fax No/Node facsimiie (416) 973-7103 2 J l .""~ """~-_."".,,,,...~,-~~~ .. Royal CommissionFuture on of the ~ CommissionI'avenir du royale sur Toronto Waterfront. secteur riverain de Toronto c...o. o..~ Commissioner Commissaire The Honourable David Crombie, PC. L'honorable David Crombie, cpo Executive Director and Counsel Directeur exeaJtif et Conseiiler juridique Ronald L Doering Ronald L. Doering TO IllS HONOUR, nIB LIEU1ENANT-GOVERNOR OF nIB PROVINCEOF ONTARIO MAY IT PLEASEYOUR HONOUR: By Order in Council O.C. 2465/89, dated the 12thday of Octorer, 1989, I was duly appointed a Commissioner under the Public Inquiries Act. I am pleased to present to you the attached Repon of the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront Respectfully submitted. (:::::=:~~:~t~~:::~.,~~~A4IA.t...:"-~ David Crombie Commissioner August 1990 171. rue Slater St., 11th Floorl11" etage 207 Queen's Quay WestlOuest ,5th Floor ISOetage P.OBoxIC.P.1527 P.O BoxICP. 4111 StalionlSuccursale '8" StatlonlSuccursale "A" Ottawa, Canada K1 P 6P5 Toronto, Canada MSW 2V4 Tel. NolNo de telephone (613)990-3306 Tel NolNo de teiephone: (416) 973-7185 Fax No I No de facsimile (613) 990-4345 Fax No I Node facsimile: (416) 973-71 03 3 Executive Director and Counsel Ronald L. Doering Assistant to the Commissioner Margaret Johnston Senior Director, Special Projects David Carter Director, Port Studies F. Shane Foreman Director I Community Relations Beverly Morley Co-ordinator I Environmental Studies SuzanneBarrett PolicyAnalyst GordonGarland Assistant to Counsel/Hearings Officer ScottW. Clark Assistantto the Senior Director, Special Projects DeborahWilliams Librarian/Head of Registry Monica Morrison Systems Administrator Marlaine Koehler Administrative Assistants GinetteBellefeuille JoanLea Publications Co-ordinator Andrea Short Editor SheilaKieran 4 FrenchEditor MargotCote Proofreader David Kilgour SupportStaff WesleyBirecki VeraKubelikova CarolynChung Charity Landon Anne Dixon Martha Lopez JanetHollingsworth JeanSinclair Soo Kim JenniferYoung Secondeesand Consultants Max Beck LouiseMadore-Payer Paul Beck Jim Maxwell JoeBerridge StephenMcLaughlin Jim Bishop ChristopherMorgan~ Brian Denney Lynn Morrow GeneDesfor Paul Muldoon NoreenDunphy Dan O'Hallora~ David L. Egar ChuckPautler Don Gamble Ron Reid Lino Grima SusanRichardson David W. Guscott Bob Shaw Andy Hamilton Ron Shimizu Neal Irwin PeterSly Beth Jefferson Ray Spaxman Carol Ketchum Laurel Spielberg JoannaKidd Mike Thorne Ken Lem Rob Tonus SimonLlewellyn Bob Woodburn Rob Lockhart JulianWoods JamesYoung 5 Preface 9 4. WaterQuality ~ 90 5. Lakefill ~ 96 1. Ecosystem ~~ 15 6. Restoring Fish, Wildlife, and The EcosystemApproach ~ 18 Natural Areas ~ 98 Ecosystemunder Stress: Greater 7. Trees in the City ~ 100 TorontoBioregion~ 21 8. Mandate of Conservation Conc Ius i on s~ ~ /"-. 45 Authorities ~ 10.9. UrbanWater-Based Form andCommuter Structure ~103 2. Principles 49 Transportation ~ 106 Clean ~ ~ ~ '- 51 B. Area-Specific Issues ~ J07 Green~ ~ "~ '- 53 1. Halton Region ~ J07 Useable~ ~ ~~ '- 59 2. City of Mississauga~ ]III113 Diverse ~ ~ '- 63 3. City of Etobicoke ~ -- ] Open ~ ~ ~ '-"-65"-"- 4. Toronto's Central Accessible ~ ~ ~~~~ 66 Waterfront ~~ ~120~146~150 Connected ~ ~ 72 5. City of Scarborough~ Affordable ~ ~ 76 6. Durham Region ~ Attractive ~ ~ ~ 77 Appendices 157 3. Regeneration~ 81 Appendix A: Orders in Council,-.. 159 A. Area-Wide Issues ~ 83 Appendix B: References ~ -_167 1. Implementingan Ecosystem Appendix C: Commission Approach~ ,~ 83 Publications ~ 2. WaterfrontTrai1~ ,- ~ 86 Appendix D: Illustration Credits ~ 3. Oak RidgesMoraine",-,,~- 88 Index ~185 7 ~102~175~179 On 1 June 1988,the Royal Commission In April and May 1990,the Commission on the Futureof the Toronto WateIfrontbegan held three series of hearings, in Burlington its work as a federal inquiry, the Honourable and Oshawa as well as in the Commission's David Crombie, Commissioner. Toronto offices, to hear opinions and ideas The Commission's mandate is to: from more than 100 groups and individuals. The Commission has established the make recommendationsregarding the Canadian Waterfront Resource Centre, future of the Toronto Waterfront, and which now has a collection of more than to seek the concurrence of affected 6,000 books, periodicals, pamphlets, and authorities in such recommendations, clippings. Subjectsinclude: economic devel- in order to ensure that, in the public opment, housing, the environment, public interest,federal lands and jurisdiction health,urban planning, transportation,parks, serve to enhance the physical, envi- recreational facilities, and information about ronmental, legislative and administra- the ways in which Toronto and other com- tive context governing the use,enjoy- munities, both in Canadaand elsewhere,use ment and developmentof the Toronto their waterfront lands. Waterfront and related lands. This report, Watershed, constitutes During its first year, the Commission the Commission's second interim report. published the reportsof five working groups, The Royal Commission on the Future of the as well as two research papers, one on the Toronto Waterfront will soon release Toronto Harbour Commissioners and the the work plan for its third year of operations other on the Toronto Island Airport. Its fIrst and will publish its final report in the Interim Report was releasedin August 1989. summer of 1991. From January to June 1989, the Com- mission held a series of public hearings on the major issuesit was considering,at which it heard from nearly 300 deputants. On 12 October 1989,the Government of Ontario, declaring that it "recognizes the importance of the Interim Report and rec- ommendations of the ...Commission ..." appointed Mr. Crombie to carryon his duties on its behalf -thus making the Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront only the secondfederal- provincial royal commission in Canadian history. Moreover, the provincial govern- ment askedthat he expandthe Commission's area of study to include the waterfront from Burlington to Newcastle and north to the Oak Ridges Moraine -in other words, the Toronto watershed. The Commission continued its vigorous publishing program and, by April 1990,had released a total of ten book-length reports, five working papers,five technical papers, the first Interim Report,and eightnewsletters. 11 At five o'clock in the morning in early July, the rain began, slowly at first and then with increased intensity. It struck roof tops and trickled down gutters, gathered on driveways, parking lots, and roads. Along its way, the swirling stormwater picked up animal feces and herbicides from parks and yards, as well I as asbestos,oil, and greasefrom roads.Before the rainfall ended, 4.5 billion litres of rain- water had gushed into the labyrinth of storm sewers under the metropolis. At seven o'clock, people began to rise, taking show- ers, brushing teeth, and flushing toilets in 1.5 million households.By eight 0' clock, when mosthad left for work or school,770 million litres of wastewaterhad gone down household drains and into the sanitary sewer system. Combined storm and sanitary sewerswere overflowing, and a noxious brew of stormwater and untreated sewage was flowing into local rivers or surging towards the sewage treatmentplants. By nine o'clock, the hopelessly overburdened treatment plants began to bypass partially treatedeffiuent directly into the nearshoreof Lake Ontario. Drivers sat in traffic with their windows closed, to avoid the exhaustfrom tailpipes, and listened to morning radio. "Heavier than usual traffic on the Don Valley southbound,the 401 westbound slow in both expressand collector lanes," the announcers said. Unseenby commuters, the brown and swollen rivers in the area disgorged their loads of sediments and toxic chemicals into Lake Ontario. At the river mouths,fisher- men tossed their catches back into the lake, mindful of the signs that warned againsteating fish. "Just a rerninder to stay out of the water at areabeaches for two days after this rainfall," the radio voices continued.By mid-morning, public health officials would be testing water at the beacheslining the waterfront; in less than a week, many would be closed to swimmers. "Cloudy this morning, sunny later with highs of 25 degrees." Along with the afternoon sunshine would come high levels of eye-stinging smog. "And cooler tem- peraturestonight, especiallynear the lake. All in all," said the news readers,"a prettyaverage day in GreaterToronto." CHAPTERONE Ecosystem
Recommended publications
  • Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-Based Recreation

    Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-Based Recreation

    Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-based Recreation 2008 Humber River State of the Watershed Report – Nature-based Recreation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The variety of landscapes, features and nature-based recreation destinations in the Humber River watershed provide potential for a wide range of recreational activities including walking, hiking, cross-country skiing, wildlife-viewing, picnicking, camping, bicycling, horseback riding, golfing, fishing, swimming and exploring cultural heritage sites. • Urban development and population growth in Humber watershed municipalities will likely result in increased use of existing greenspace and nature-based recreation facilities and demand for additional greenspace and facilities. • There are approximately 8,800 hectares of public greenspace in the Humber River watershed (10% of the watershed). Most of the greenspace is owned by the TRCA (6,644 hectares or 75%). The quantity of greenspace in the Humber watershed increased by 243 hectares between 2000 and 2005. • Oak Ridges Corridor Park, created through the transfer of 428 hectares of land from private owners and developers to the Province of Ontario in 2004, protects the last remaining natural corridor link between eastern and western parts of the Oak Ridges Moraine in Richmond Hill and represents a major addition to the Humber watershed greenspace system. • The length of inter-regional trails in the Humber River watershed totals 213 km. The total length of inter-regional trails has increased by 28 km since 2000 and an additional 15 km of inter-regional trails are proposed to be built in the watershed. • Numerous municipalities have proposed new local trails in the Humber River watershed, totaling 168 km in length.
  • Toronto's Milkweeds and Relatives 8 Trail Marker Trees in Ontario 10

    Toronto's Milkweeds and Relatives 8 Trail Marker Trees in Ontario 10

    Number 587, April 2012 Female cardinal photographed by Augusta Takeda during TFN outing at High Park, February 11 REGULARS FEATURES Coming Events 18 Toronto’s Milkweeds and 8 Extracts from Outings Reports 16 Relatives From the Archives 17 Trail Marker Trees in Ontario 10 Monthly Meetings Notice 3 Trees for Toronto Web 12 Monthly Meeting Report 7 Resources President’s Report 6 Toronto Island Tree Tour 13 TFN Outings 4 Canada’s Forest Birds TFN Publications 5 14 Weather – This Time Last Year 19 at Risk TFN 587-2 April 2012 Toronto Field Naturalist is published by the Toronto Field BOARD OF DIRECTORS Naturalists, a charitable, non-profit organization, the aims of President Bob Kortright which are to stimulate public interest in natural history and Past President Wendy Rothwell to encourage the preservation of our natural heritage. Issued Vice President monthly September to December and February to May. & Outings Margaret McRae Views expressed in the Newsletter are not necessarily those Sec.-Treasurer Walter Weary of the editor or Toronto Field Naturalists. The Newsletter is Communications Alexander Cappell printed on 100% recycled paper. Membership Judy Marshall Monthly Lectures Nancy Dengler ISSN 0820-636X Monthly Lectures Corinne McDonald Monthly Lectures Lavinia Mohr Outreach Tom Brown IT’S YOUR NEWSLETTER! Webmaster Lynn Miller We welcome contributions of original writing, up to 500 words, of observations on nature in and around Toronto, MEMBERSHIP FEES reviews, poems, sketches, paintings, and photographs of $20 YOUTH (under 26) TFN outings (digital or print, include date and place). $30 SENIOR SINGLE (65+) Include your name, address and phone number so $40 SINGLE, SENIOR FAMILY (2 adults, 65+) $50 FAMILY (2 adults – same address, children included) submissions can be acknowledged.
  • Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome

    Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome

    www.trca.on.ca Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome to Glen Haffy Conservation Area, a beautiful natural area located within the Humber River Watershed, Humber River Watershed Fishing at Glen Haffy at the junction of Ontario’s two most dominant The Humber River watershed covers an area of 903 square Each year, Glen Haffy raises 60,000 rainbow trout at its on-site geological features - The Niagara Escarpment and kilometres, from the headwaters on the Niagara Escarpment fish hatchery, and these fish are released into the fishing the Oak Ridges Moraine. and Oak Ridges Moraine down to Lake Ontario. The watershed ponds at Glen Haffy Conservation Area, the Glen Haffy Fly provides many benefits to the people who live within it including Fishing Club and Heart Lake Conservation Area. The proceeds Glen Haffy Conservation Area is a 189 hectare Toronto drinking water, solace, renewal and contact with nature. generated by angling fees help fund the fish rearing program. and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) property with great hiking trails you can escape into. Oak Ridges Moraine Glen Haffy Fly Fishing Club The Oak Ridges Moraine stretches as a ridge of hilly terrain for Join the Glen Haffy Fly Fishing Club, escape into 160 kilometres from the Niagara Escarpment in the west to the tranquility and enjoy: headwaters of the Trent River in the east. Rain that is collected and stored in the moraine’s vast underground layers of sand and • Access to private gated Headwaters Ponds located on 600 gravel, which are known as aquifers, eventually resurfaces as acres of prestine conservation lands Become a healthy, clean water that feeds the majority of river systems in • Use of Row Boats, Docks and Log Cabin Conservation the Greater Toronto Area.
  • Tommy Thompson Park Update

    Tommy Thompson Park Update

    Attachment 3: City of Toronto Report for Action REPORT FOR ACTION Tommy Thompson Park Update Date: May 10, 2021 To: Infrastructure and Environment Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Wards: Ward 14 - Toronto-Danforth SUMMARY Tommy Thompson Park (the Park) is the largest component of the broader Leslie Street Spit (the Spit), located at the base of Leslie Street where it meets the shore of Lake Ontario; all components of the Spit will ultimately be consolidated as Tommy Thompson Park (see Attachment 1). The Park is designated in the Official Plan as an Environmentally Significant Area and is recognized internationally as a Canadian Important Bird Area for supporting the conservation of birds and their habitat. The Park is owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and managed in partnership between TRCA and the City of Toronto. The Park demonstrates that nature can flourish in cities and contribute to the well-being of city residents; only minutes from downtown, the Park is an escape from the city, and a place to marvel at the force of nature. It is a pet-free urban wilderness that exists as the result of decades of careful management and stewardship of natural succession and habitat restoration processes by TRCA with the support of the City, community groups, and other partners. Its significant and diverse aquatic and terrestrial environments provide habitat for at-risk species who are otherwise challenged by the interrelated impacts of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, urbanization and climate change. The Park's evolution into an urban wilderness can also be attributed to the work of advocacy groups like the Friends of the Spit, founded in 1977 by naturalists advocating for the Spit to grow naturally, without development and the privatization of uses.
  • Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report

    Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report

    Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services
  • Toronto Central Waterfront Public Forum #2

    Toronto Central Waterfront Public Forum #2

    TORONTO CENTRAL WATERFRONT PUBLIC FORUM #2 Queens Quay Revitalization EA Bathurst Street to Lower Jarvis Street Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Schedule C) December 08, 2008 1 WATERFRONT TORONTO UPDATE 2 Central Waterfront International Design Competition 3 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 4 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 5 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 6 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 7 East Bayfront Waters Edge Promenade: Design Underway 8 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 9 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 10 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 Metropolis Article 11 Rees Wavedeck: Construction Underway 12 Simcoe Wavedeck: Construction Underway 13 Spadina Bridge: Construction Early-2009 14 What Have We Been Doing for the Past 11 Months? • Consider and follow up on comments from Public Forum 1 • Assess baseline technical feasibility of design alternatives – Over 90 meetings in total: • City and TTC technical staff • Partner agencies •Stakeholders • Landowners/Property Managers • Adjacent project efforts • Advanced transit and traffic modelling • Develop Alternative Design Concepts and Evaluation (Phase 3) • Coordination with East Bayfront Transit EA 15 Study Area: Revised 16 Overview • Review of EA Phases 1 & 2 from Public Forum #1: January 2008 • EA Phase 3: Alternative Design Alternatives – Long list of Design Alternatives – Evaluation of Design Alternatives • Next Steps – Evaluation Criteria for Shortlisted Design
  • Domestics' Cross-Cultural News Monthly Newsletter of the International Coalition to End Domestics' Exploitation

    Domestics' Cross-Cultural News Monthly Newsletter of the International Coalition to End Domestics' Exploitation

    -Domestics' Cross-Cultural News monthly newsletter of the International Coalition to End Domestics' Exploitation AUGUST 1986 INTERCEDE PROTESTS 'RELEASE LETTERS' A DOMESTIC WORKER SPEAKS OUT! INTERCEDE has recently written to Recently the Service Unit handled a officials of the Canada Employment complaint from a foreign domestic & Immigration Commission to protest worker who was refused permission the use of so-called 'release let- to find a new job because her form- ters' at a local immigration offi- er employer would not give her a ce in Toronto. 'release letter'. At issue is the fact that foreign Elke Weltle came to Canada from Ger- domestic workers are being denied many in December 1985, to work for the right to seek new employment if a family in Thornhill. After failing their former employers refuse to in her attempts to resolve problems give them 'release letters' saying with her employers, she gave them that their services are no longer three week's notice last June and required. left. She has been unable to work for the past three months because If a domestic worker cannot produ- the employer refuses to give her a ce such a letter when she reports 'release letter'. to the Canada .Immigration Centre - even is she left her employer for INTERCEDE appealed to immigration of- a legitimate reason - she is being ficials on her behalf and arrange- told that she can remain in Canada ments have now been made for her to until her visa expires but cannot go to Buffalo, New York, and re-en- work. ter Canada under the Foreign Domestic Program.
  • Attachment 1 Summary of Procurements.Pdf

    Attachment 1 Summary of Procurements.Pdf

    1 Attachment 1 ‐ Summary of Procurements Highest Ranked Goods/Services Contingency Total Cost (Before Total TRCA Division Project Name Awarded Bidder Contract Cost Responded Procured Cost Revisions) Vendors (Responsible) Engineering services for slope stability, erosion Eldorado Court, risk assessment, and Grandravine Drive and AECOM CANADA Restoration and alternative conceptual $225,489.00 $22,548.90 $248,037.90 11 5 Ladyshot Crescent, in the LTD. Infrastructure design for forty‐five (45) City of Toronto properties in the City of Toronto. Fill Quality Control, Site Decommissioning and 2019 laboratory Restoration and ALS Canada Ltd $49,300.00 $4,930.00 $54,230.00 4 3 Environmental Monitoring analytical services. Infrastructure Programs Professional engineering services for preliminary AMTEC Engineering Wiley Bridge design, detailed design $36,325.00 $5,448.75 $41,773.75 17 3 Corporate Services Ltd. and contract administration services. Pre‐construction and Upper Highland Creek Pan post‐construction CCTV Restoration and Andrews Engineer $33,274.00 $12,000.00 $45,274.00 12 1 Am Path Connection inspection services of Infrastructure sanitary infrastructure. Newtonbrook Creek Engineering services for AQUAFOR BEECH Restoration and Bridge Replacement Slope detailed designs for $35,800.00 $3,580.00 $39,380.00 7 2 LIMITED Infrastructure Stabilization Project slope stabilization. 2 Attachment 1 ‐ Summary of Procurements Highest Ranked Goods/Services Contingency Total Cost (Before Total TRCA Division Project Name Awarded Bidder Contract Cost Responded Procured Cost Revisions) Vendors (Responsible) Engineering services for Grey Abbey Ravine Slope AQUAFOR BEECH Restoration and development of detailed $59,160.00 $5,916.00 $65,076.00 5 1 Stabilization Project LIMITED Infrastructure designs.
  • The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005

    The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005

    THE FISH COMMUNITIES OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT: SUMMARY AND ASSESSMENT 1989 - 2005 SEPTEMBER 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the many technical staff, past and present, of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources who diligently collected electrofishing data for the past 16 years. The completion of this report was aided by the Canada Ontario Agreement (COA). 1 Jason P. Dietrich, 1 Allison M. Hennyey, 1 Rick Portiss, 1 Gord MacPherson, 1 Kelly Montgomery and 2 Bruce J. Morrison 1 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON, M3N 1S4, Canada 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake Ontario Fisheries Management Unit, Glenora Fisheries Station, Picton, ON, K0K 2T0, Canada © Toronto and Region Conservation 2008 ABSTRACT Fish community metrics collected for 16 years (1989 — 2005), using standardized electrofishing methods, throughout the greater Toronto region waterfront, were analyzed to ascertain the current state of the fish community with respect to past conditions. Results that continue to indicate a degraded or further degrading environment include an overall reduction in fish abundance, a high composition of benthivores, an increase in invasive species, an increase in generalist species biomass, yet a decrease in specialist species biomass, and a decrease in cool water Electrofishing in the Toronto Harbour thermal guild species biomass in embayments. Results that may indicate a change in a positive community health direction include no significant changes to species richness, a marked increase in diversity in embayments, a decline in non-native species in embayments and open coasts (despite the invasion of round goby), a recent increase in native species biomass, fluctuating native piscivore dynamics, increased walleye abundance, and a reduction in the proportion of degradation tolerant species.
  • Sugar Wharf Is a Community of Extraordinary Proportions

    Sugar Wharf Is a Community of Extraordinary Proportions

    A WHOLE NEW COMMUNITY From Humber Bay to the Eastern Beaches, Toronto’s magnificent waterfront spans 46 kms. Under the direction of Waterfront Toronto, this highly desirable section of the city is undergoing a sea change. Created by the federal and provincial government and the City of Toronto, Waterfront Toronto has the mandate to transform the area into a vibrant public and cultural space for all Torontonians. Unequalled in size, it’s one of the largest urban revitalization projects in the world. The total area for development is 800 hectars in size, and is one of the largest revitalization projects in the world! Collaborating with developers like Menkes, Waterfront Toronto aims to create 40,000 new residences and approximately 40,000 new jobs. With the introduction of mixed-used neighbourhoods, offices, expanding public transit, parks, and public spaces, the waterfront will be a coveted place to live, work, learn and play. By adopting an economically and environmentally sustainable design approach, this reimagination will change the face of Toronto and deliver a positive, meaningful relationship between the lake and the city. THE LAKE. THE LIFE. THE CITY. LAKE SHORE BLVD E NEW ST COOPER ST Rising on the shores of Toronto’s waterfront, Sugar Wharf is a community of extraordinary proportions. FREELAND ST Striking the perfect work-life balance, this exceptional development will be the future-forward ideal today’s urban population seeks. Home to 7,500 residents, and 4,000 HARBOUR ST office workers once completed, this 11.5-acre community RETAIL PROMENADE offers homes, offices, shops, restaurants, school, daycare, park and more.
  • Medicare and Beyond: a 21St Century Vision, Saskatoon

    Medicare and Beyond: a 21St Century Vision, Saskatoon

    Medicare and Beyond A 21st Century Vision Speaking notes for The Hon. Roy J. Romanow, P.C., O.C., S.O.M., Q.C. Chair, Canadian Index of Wellbeing Advisory Board Senior Fellow, Political Studies, University of Saskatchewan; Atkinson Economic Justice Fellow; Commissioner on the Future of Health Care in Canada; Former Premier of Saskatchewan To Canadian Doctors of Medicare 25th Anniversary Celebration of the Canada Health Act Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada August 16, 2009 [Document from http://ciw.ca] 1. Introduction Good evening everyone. It’s wonderful to join you on this historic evening celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the Canada Health Act. Let me start by thanking Canadian Doctors for Medicare for your kind invitation to speak. Thank you Ryan (Meili) for your warm introduction. I’ve come to accept that the older I get the more my introductions sound like eulogies, but let me assure you I have miles to go before I sleep. I can’t think of a better place to mark this anniversary. Many of you know that I’m a Saskatoon native, born and bred, and I take pride in the fact that the Broadway Theatre is community-owned and operated. Those of you who are from other parts of the country may not know that this theatre was built in 1945, the very same year that the Province of Saskatchewan issued government health-care cards to all pensioners, all women on mother's allowance, and all disabled people in Saskatchewan, entitling them to full medicare coverage including drugs. I’m very pleased to be here, and I’m even more pleased to serve as Danielle Martin’s warm-up act.
  • Toronto and Region Watersheds Report Card 2013

    Toronto and Region Watersheds Report Card 2013

    Facts and Figures What We Are Doing What You Can Do Where We Are Municipalities Toronto, Peel, York, Durham, Adjala - Tosorontio, Ajax, • Farm and other rural non-farm private landowners in the Regions of Peel and York have • Divert your downspouts away from paved areas and install a rain barrel to capture We are one of Aurora, Brampton, Caledon, King, Markham, Mississauga, been capping abandoned wells, fencing livestock out of watercourses, building proper and reuse the rainwater that falls on your roof. This reduces run-off to sewers, 36 Conservation Mono, Pickering, Richmond Hill, Uxbridge, Whitchurch - manure storage facilities and undertaking other best management practices under TRCA’s prevents flooding and saves money on your water bill. Authorities across Stouffville, Vaughan Rural Clean Water Quality Program and the Peel Rural Clean Water Program. Toronto and Region Ontario under Watercourses Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Humber River, Don River, • Reduce or eliminate the use of salt, pesticides and fertilizers, which contaminate the umbrella organization of Rouge River, Highland Creek, Petticoat Creek, Duffins Creek, • From 2008 to 2012, TRCA and its volunteers have planted 1,718,270 native trees, rivers, ponds and groundwater supplies. Carruthers Creek Watersheds Conservation shrubs and aquatic plants within TRCA’s watersheds. Healthy forests provide habitat Ontario. Longest Reach of River/Creek (km) Etobicoke Creek – 59, Mimico Creek – 34, for wildlife, help cool urban areas, retain water and reduce run-off, and capture CO • Decommission old wells on your property and maintain your septic system regularly (including Waterfront) Humber River – 126, Don River – 52, Rouge River – 58, 2 Highland Creek – 26, Petticoat Creek – 16, from the air to reduce impacts of climate change.