Resettlement Plan

Loan No- 2949

Project No. 40540-014

March 2019

ADB Loan No. 2949-BAN (SF): SASEC Road Connectivity Project

Improvement of Joydevpur-Chandra-- Road to a 4-Lane Highway

Supplementary Resettlement Plan

This Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ADB Loan No. 2949-BAN (SF): SASEC Road Connectivity Project

Improvement of Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga Road to a 4-Lane Highway

Supplementary Resettlement Plan

October 2018

Project Implementation Consultants:

Kunhwa Engineering & Consulting Co. Ltd. (South Korea) in Joint Venture With Korea Consultants International Co. Ltd. (South Korea) Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. (India) in association With

Development Design Consultants Ltd. () Supplementary Resettlement Plan

ADB Loan No. 2949-BAN (SF) October 2018

BAN: SASEC Road Connectivity Project

Improvement of Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga Road to a 4-Lane Highway

Prepared by the Roads and Highways Department, Ministry of Road Transport and Bridges, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the Asian Development Bank. This is a supplementary to the Resettlement Plan (February 2014) for SASEC Road Connectivity Project’s additional scope of works under Project Component: Improvement of JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway.

SASEC Road Connectivity Project

Improvement of Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga Road to a 4-Lane Highway

Supplementary Resettlement Plan

October 2018

Document Authorization

TEAM LEADER PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTANT SASEC ROAD CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

PROJECT MANAGER DEPUTY PROJECT DIRECTOR (EE), RHD (EE), RHD SASEC ROAD CONNECTIVITY SASEC ROAD CONNECTIVITY PROJECT PROJECT Roads and Highways Department

Roads and Highways Department

PROJECT DIRECTOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT DIRECTOR (ACE), RHD (SE), RHD SASEC ROAD CONNECTIVITY PROJECT SASEC ROAD CONNECTIVITY PROJECT Roads and Highways Department Roads and Highways Department

Supplementary Resettlement Plan (Draft)

October 2018

ADB Loan No. 2949-BAN (SF): SASEC Road Connectivity Project

Improvement of Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga Road to a 4-Lane Highway

Prepared by the Roads and Highways Department, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of30 August 2018)

Currency unit Bangladesh Taka (BDT) BDT1.00= USD 0.121 USD1.00= BDT82.42

WEIGHTS AND MEASUREMENTS

1 ha = 2.47 acre 1 ha = 10,000 sq.m 1 acre = 100 decimal

This supplementary Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the "terms of use" section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank ADFD - Abu Dhabi Fund for Development AH - Affected Households AP - Affected Person APD - Additional Project Director BDT - Bangladesh Taka (currency in Bangladesh) CBE - Commercial and Business Enterprise CCL - Cash Compensation under Law CPR - Common Property Resources CRO - Chief Resettlement Officer DC - Deputy Commissioner DPD - Deputy Project Director DPP - Development Project Proposal EA - Executing Agency EP - Entitled Person FGD - Focused Group Discussion ft - foot/ feet (3.28ft = 1m) GOB - Government of Bangladesh GRC - Grievance Redress Mechanism ha - hectare HH - Household IOL - Inventory of Losses INGO - Implementing Non-Governmental Organization IR - Involuntary Resettlement JCTE - Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga km - kilometer LA - Land Acquisition LAR - Land Acquisition and Resettlement LAP - Land Acquisition Plan LHS - Left Hand Side LIRP - Livelihood and Income Restoration Program M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation

MOL - Ministry of Land MORTB - Ministry of Road Transport and Bridges NGO - Non-Government Organization NTH - Non-Title Holder OFID - OPEC Fund for International Development PAVC - Property Assessment and Valuation Committee PIC - Project Implementation Consultants PMU - Project Management Unit PD - Project Director PIB - Public Information Booklet PIU - Public Implementation Unit RAC - Resettlement Advisory Committee RCP - Road Construction Project RDPP - Revised Development Project Proposal RHD - Roads and Highways Department RHS - Right Hand Side ROW - Right-of-way RV - Replacement Value SASEC - South Asia Sub-regional Economic Cooperation SEC - Social and Environment Circle SES - Socioeconomic Survey sq. ft - square feet SMR - Social Monitoring Report SMVT - Slow Moving Vehicular Traffic SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement SRP - Supplementary Resettlement Plan TH - Title Holder TOR - Terms of Reference USD - United States Dollar WP - Work Package VDH - Vulnerable Displaced Household VDP - Vulnerable Displaced Person

GLOSSARY

Affected Person Any person, affected households (AHs), firms or private institutions who, on account of changes that result from the project will have their (i) standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title, or interest in any house, land (including residential, commercial, agricultural, forest, and/or grazing land), water resources, or any other moveable or fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted, or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business, occupation, place of work or residence, or habitat adversely affected, with physical or economic displacement. Assistance It means support, rehabilitation and restoration measures extended in cash and/or in kind over and above the compensation for lost assets. Awardees It refers to person with interests in land to be acquired by the project after their ownership of said land has been confirmed by the respective Deputy Commissioner's office as well as persons with interests in other assets to be acquired by the project. Compensation for acquired assets is provided to 'awardees 'through notification under Section-7 of the Land Acquisition Ordinance. Compensation-means payment in cash or kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by a project at replacement cost at current market value. Compensation Payment in cash or in kind to replace the losses of lands, housing, income and other assets caused by the project. Cut-off date It refers to the date after which eligibility for compensation or resettlement assistance will not be considered. The Date of service of notice under Section 4 of the Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Act, 2017 is considered as the cut-off date for recognition of legal compensation and the starting date of carrying out the census/inventory of losses, for eligibility of resettlement benefits. Any households who built after the Project’s cut-off date will not be eligible for assistance Detailed This activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of Measurement the asset losses, severity of impacts, and list of affected persons, Survey (DMS) guided by the use of approved detailed engineering drawings. Displaced In the context of involuntary resettlement (IR), displaced persons are Persons those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter)and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated park sand protected areas (source: ADB SPS, 2009). Economic Loss of lands, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of Displacement livelihoods as a result of (i) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas (source: ADB SPS, 2009)

Encroachers The term refers to those people who move into the project area after the cut-off date and are therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation measures provided by the project, and those extending attached private land in to public land or constructed structure on public land for renting out. Entitlements Include the range of measures comprising cash or kind compensation, relocation cost, income restoration assistance, transfer assistance, income substitution, and business restoration which are due to affected households, depending on the type and degree/nature of losses, to rest or their social and economic base. Grievance Redress A mechanism to receive and facilitate the resolution of affected Mechanism (GRM) person’s concerns and grievances about physical and economic displacement and other project impacts, paying particular attention to the impacts on vulnerable groups. Household This includes all persons or members of the household residing under one roof and operating as a single-family unit (living and eating together, sharing the same kitchen and cooking food togetherr), who are adversely affected by a project or any of its components. Income Restoration Re-establishment of the sources of income and livelihood of the affected households. Income Restoration A program with various activities aimed to support the affected Program persons to recover their income and/or livelihood to pre- project level. It is designed to address the specific needs of the affected persons based on the socioeconomic survey and consultations conducted. Inventory of Losses Includes the inventory of the affected properties during census survey for record of affected or lost assets for preparation of the resettlement plan. During RP preparation, the process where all fixed assets (i.e., land use for residence. Land Acquisition The process whereby an individual, household, firm or private institution is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency for public purposes in return for compensation at replacement costs. Meaningful A process that (I) begins early in the project preparation stage Consultation and is carried out on an ongoing basis throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and

implementation issues (source: ADB SPS, 2009). Non-Title Holders Those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying and includes people using private or public land without permission, permit or grant (i.e., those without legal title to the land and/ or structures occupied or used by them. ADB’s policy explicitly states that such people cannot be denied resettlement assistance. Physical Relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter as a Displacement result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. Project Affected Units Collectively indicate residential households (HHs), (PAU) commercial and business enterprises (CBEs), common property resources (CPRs) and other affected entities as a whole. Project Affected Includes residential households and commercial and Family business enterprises except CPRs. Relocation Displacement or physical moving of thedisplaced persons from the affected area/site and rebuilding homes, infrastructure, provision of assets, including productive land/employment and re-establishing income, livelihoods, living and social systems. Replacement Cost The value of assets to replace the loss at current market price, or its nearest equivalent, and is the amount of cash or kind needed to replace an asset in existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged. Resettlement This refers to mitigation of all the impacts associated with land acquisition including relocation and reconstruction of physical assets such as housing and restoration of income and livelihoods in post-relocation period. Resettlement Plan A time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities/ actions, responsibilities, monitoring and evaluation. This term as used in this report, refers to the original resettlement plan (RP) prepared by RHD and submitted to ADB in 2014. Severely Affected A person who will (i) lose 10% or more of their productive Person assets (i.e., agriculture/ aquaculture land holding, and/or (ii) physically displaced from housing and/or (iii) lose 10% or more of total income sources due to the project. Vulnerable Groups Distinct groups of people (or HHs) who might suffer disproportionately or face risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement, and include:(i) HHs headed by women, elderly or disabled, (ii) Households that fall on or below the below the poverty line, (iii) landless, and (iv) IPs or ethnic minorities; and (iv) HHs of low social group or caste.

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUT IVE SU MMARY 1-7 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8 A. Background of the Project 8-9 B. Project Location and Current Progress 9-10 C. Rationa le for the Supp lemen tary Res ett lement Pl an 10 -20 D. Project Benefits and Impacts 20-20 E. Measu res to Minimi ze Impac ts 20 -21 F. Objectives of the Supp lemen tary Res ett lement Pl an 21 -22 II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT 23-31 A. Methodology for Preparing the Supplementary Resettlement Plan 23 -24 B. Summary of Impacts of the New SMVT Lane and Structures (JCTE 24-25 Road) C. Scope of Land Acquisition 25 -26 D. Affected Non-Land Assets 26-28 E. Affected Trees 28 -29 F. Impacts on Wage Earners 29 -29 G. Vulnerability Status of Affected Households 30 -30 H. Project Impact on Gender 30 -31 I. Summary of Resettlement Impacts III. SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATIONAND PROFILE 32

A. Methodology Used in Determining the Socio-economic Profile 32-32 B. Demographic Profile of Affected Population 32 -32 C. Socioeconomic Profile of Affected Population 33-34

IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION 35-42

A. Consu ltation and Part icipation 35 -36 B. Information Disclosure Measures 36 -39 C. Stakeholders Response to the Project 39 -39 D. Key Concerns of Affected Persons and Mitigation Measures 40 -41 E. Disclosure Plan 41 -42 F. Community Consultation During RP Implementation 42-42

43-47 V. GRIEVANCE AND REDRESS MECHANISM A. Background and Need for Grievance Redress Mechanism 43 -43 B. Objectives of Grievance Redress Mechanism 43-43 C. GRM for Resettlement Plan (2014) and Supplementary RP 43-45 D. Scope of Work of the Grievance Redress Committee 45-45 E. Filing Grievance Cases and Documentation 45-47 F. Approval of GRCs and Entitlements 47-47 G. Grievance Redress Monitoring 47-47

VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK 48-51

A. Legal Framework 48 -48 B. Asian Development Bank Safeguard Policy (2009) 48-50 C. Legal and Policy Commitments 51-51 D. Gap Analysis Between GOB Laws and ADB SPS, 2009 52-52

VII. ENTITLEMENT, ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT 53-68

A. Eligibility 53-68 B. Compensation Entitlement Matrix and Policy 53-63 C. Compensation Payment Procedure 64-66 D. Property Valuation and Compensation 66-67

VIII. REL OCAT IO N OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS 68-69 A. Scope of Displacement and Relocation 68-69 B. Options for Relocation 68-69 C. Social Preparation for Relocation 68-69 D. Integration of Displaced Households with Host Population 69-70

IX. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION 70-70

A. Livelihood Impact and Risks 70-70 B. Rehabilitation Measures 70 -70 C. Gender Considerations 71 -71 D. Employment in Construction 71-71

X. LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT BUDGET 72-74 A. Budget and Financial Plan 72-75 B. Indicative Summary Budget for Compensation and Resettlement 73-73 C. Assessment of Unit Cost for Land and Assets 73-73 D. Approval of Resettlement Budget 74-74 E. Management of Compensation and Flow of Awards 75-75 XI. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 76-80 A. Institutional Arrangement for RP Implementation 76-80 B. Property Assessment and Valuation Committee (PAVC) 78-80 XI. MONITORING AND REPORTING 82-82 A. Objectives of Monitoring 82-82 B. Scope of Monitoring 82-82 C. Institutional Arrangements for Monitoring and Reporting 83-83 D. Reporting Requirements 83-83 ANNEXURES: 84- Annex 1: Gap Analysis Between the GOB and ADB SPS, 2009 136 -140 Annex 2: Consultation Meetings, Key Issues, Pictures and Attendance During 141-148 the Census/ IOL, June to August 2018) Annex 3: Follow-up Consultation with Pictures and Location of CPRs (in 149-166 Chainage and Work Package) and Other Assets Affected by the Project Annex 4: List of Land Acquisition by Mouza, Chainage and Contract Package 167 -185 Annex 5: Indicative Budget for Compensation and Resettlement by Type of 186-203 Category Losses Annex 6: Summary of Budget for Compensation and Resettlement for by 204-217 Contract Package Annex 7: LA and RP Implementation Schedule 21 8-22 5

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Status of Construction Packages Under PIC’s Scope of Work 10-10 Table 2: Summary Description and Location of the Proposed New SMVT 12-13 Lane and Structures Table 3: Table 3: List of Bridges to be Constructed Under the New SMVT 14-15 and Structures Table 4: Table 4: List of Culverts to be Constructed Under the SMVT 15-16 Lane and Structures Table 5: Table 5: Proposed SMVT Underpasses in Various Locations 19 -20 Table 6: Summary of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts 25-25 (Displacements and Other Impacts) Table 7: Land by area Requirements 25-25 Table 8: Category of Land By Work Package 26-26 Table 9: Impacts of Quantity of Structure by Work Package 26-27 Table 10: Total Number of Affected CPRs by Type and Contract Package 27 -27 Table 11: Names and Location of the CPRs affected by the Project 27-28 (in Mouza/ District and Chainage) by Contract Package Table 12: Number of Trees Affected in RTW by Work Package 29-29 and Si ze on Own Land Table 13: Number of Trees Affected in Private Land by Type, Size 29-29 and Work Package Table 14: Affected Wage Labors by Work Package 29-29 Table 15: Total Number of Vulnerable Households Affected by the Project 30 -30 Table 16: Total Number of Affected Population by Age Group and Location 32-32 Table 17: Sex Profile of the Displaced Population by Location 33-33 Table 18: Primary Occu pati on of Aff ected HHs 34-34 Table 19: Per Capital income of Affected HHs 34-34 Table 20: Number of Consultations Conducted and Participants (SRP) 36-36 Table 21: Summary of the Consultation Meetings/ FGDs Conducted 37-38 (July-Aug 2018) Table 22: Summary of Expectations and Suggestions of 39-39 Affected People by Location Table 23: Observations/ Expectations and Mitigation Measures Raised by 40-41 the Stakeholders Consulted (July-August 2018) Table 24: Grievance Redress Mechanism for the Project 44 -45 Table 25: Grievance Redress Resolution Process 46 -47 Table 26: Eligibility and Entitlement Matrix 53-63 Table 27: Procedures for Land Acquisition and Compensation 64-64 Payment toTitled Hol der (TH) Table 28: Steps or Proc eduresfor Paying Resettlement Benefits to NTHs 65 -65 Table29: Relocation Requirements 67-67 Tabl e30 : Types of inc ome imp acts on Di sp lac ed HHs/APs 69 -69 Table31: Indicative Summary Budget for Compensation and Resettlement 72-72 Tabl e32 : Instituti onal Resp ons ibili ties in R eset tlement Proc ess 78 -79 Table 33: Indicative Implementation Schedule 79 -80 Table 33: Reporting Requirements 82 -82

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Project Location Map 11 -11 Figure 2: Original Road Cross Section and Proposed Road Cross Section 17 -17

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background Information 1. The Improvement of Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga (JCTE) 4-Lane Highway is one of the components (or subprojects) of the ADB Loan No.2949–BAN (SF): South Asia Sub-regional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) Road Connectivity Project. Theproject is being implemented by the Roads and Highways Department (RHD) of the Ministry of Transport, Roads and Bridges (MORTB). 2. The project aimed to help the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (GOB) and its people in achieving economic development and poverty reduction through improvement of transport efficiency and strengthening integrated road network linking the national, regional and district roads. The JCTE Road will enhance the connectivity or access to 9 districts in the western part of the country and adjacent areas. The Project’s impact is increased domestic and regional trade through Bangladesh, and the project outcome is sustainable enhancement of international and domestic road connectivity. 3. The main component of the project is to upgrade about 70 km of the JCTE road to a 4-Lane Highway with safety features including separate lanes for Slow Moving Vehicular Traffic (SMVT) and structures to significantly increase the capacity and safety of this highway section, which provides a vital link to the National Highway network. The previous 2-lane highway has no divider between two opposite direction traffic nor separate lane for slow moving vehicles, which often gets severely congested and also poses significant threats to road safety. This explains why the 2-lane highway was proposed for a 4-lane highway under the Project. 1

4. The original DPP was prepared in 2012 based on a Feasibility Study conducted in 2010 to 2011. The Feasibility Study was conducted under the Priority Roads Project funded by ADB, aimed at improving the internal road corridor of Bangladesh. The JCTE road was later selected as a sub-regional connectivity corridor and was decided later that this road will be improved as an international standard road corridor. The design of the road was prepared under the Sub-regional Road Transport Project Preparatory Facility which was focused on the development of Regional Connectivity Corridor. Thus, the design prepared during the Feasibility Study stage was modified accordingly. Considering the recent cases of road crush or vehicular accidents in the corridor, road safety features have been proposed in the revised design and cost estimates were reflected in the Revised DPP prepared by RHD and approved by the MORTB in February 2018.

B. Rationale for the Supplementary Resettlement Plan 5. The Project’s new scope of works include construction of additional SMVT Lane in the JCTE road and other structures such as five additional flyovers to be constructed at Gorai, Kaliakor, Naojuri, Shafipur and Chandra loop; and 13 new underpasses with a total length of 103.7 m; several new bridges with a total length of 2,809 meters; and culverts with a total length of 427.245 meters and underpasses in various locations along the JCTE road. This new scope of works would require additional land acquisition and new right-of-way (ROW) and will affect settlements and business hubs in 17 mouzas in and 53 mouzas in . 6. The summary of description and location of the proposed new SMVT lane and structures proposed under the additional scope of works for the Project is shown in the table in the next page.

1Ibid.

1 Summary Description and Location of the Proposed New SMVT Lane and Structures No. Description of Proposed Design/ Structures Location (in Chainage) 1 In WP-01 to WP-04: Improvement/ widening of SMVT and section wise from Vogra intersection of Joydevpur to Elenga (WP-01 to WP-04) would require land acquisition JCTE Road due to construction of flyovers, underpasses and other (0+000 - 69.3 km) structures. Proposed new SMVT Lane has a width of about 4. 2 m on one side of the JCTE road. 2 In WP - 02: Inclusion of Flyover near ICT Park at Kaliakoir 18+924-19+194 (L=270 m excluding ramp) at Ch 18+924-19+194 and Gorai (Kaliakoir) Flyover (L= 411.15 m excluding ramp) at Ch. 26+639.71 - 26+639.71-27+050 27+050+868 under Contract package +869 (Gorai) SASEC -RCP/ICB/W -01(WP -02) 3 In WP -01: Inclusion of a 945 m long Flyover at Shafipur at 12+223-13+169 Ch. 12+223 - 13+169; and a 290 m Flyover at Naojuri at (Shafipur) Ch. 02+500 - 02+787.5 under Contract Package 02+500-02+787.5 SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-01(WP -01) (Naojuri) 4 In WP-01: Chandra Loof, Inclusion of 462 meter additional 16+570-17+040 loops (Tangail-Chandra-Nabinagar) in Chandra Flyover. (Chandra Loof) 5 In WP-01: Three (3) Separate SMVT bridges/ for Kodda-1 (Ch. 3+594) Kodda-1, Kodda-2 and Bymail to make SMVT lane Kodda-2 (Ch. 4+174) & effectively workable, and are required on one side. Bymail Bridge (Ch. 5+272) 6 In WP-04: Relocation of Gharinda fly-over to Rabna under Rabna junction SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-02(WP-04) (Ch. 63+640 km) Inclusion of Underpasses along JCTE road with a total Various Locations 7 length of 103.7 m (combined) in various locations. (JCTE Road)

4 underpasses are located in  Proposed 5 road crossing facilities for SMVT and WP-02; 8 underpasses in  Proposed 8 road crossing channels (or pedestrian WP-03; and 1 in WP-04 crossings) instead of foot-over bridges) 8 Additional new bridges in various locations with a total Various locations length of 2,809 meters (combined for all) (refer to Table 3 for details) 9 New culverts to be constructed with a total length of Various locations 427.245 (combined) (refer to Table 4 for details) Source: RDPP, February 2018

7. A Resettlement Plan for Project component No.1: Improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway was prepared in February 2014 based on the original design for SASEC the project in 2011 to 2012. The RP (February 2014) was approved by ADB and the MORTB, and uploaded in ADB website. A supplementary RP is required by ADB for road sections for the proposed new SMVT lane and structures. The supplementary RP includes information on the changes in the designs and/or additional scope of works from the original scope of the Project, data gathered from the inventory of losses (IOL) and socioeconomic survey (SES) carried out for the affected households within the project area from June to August 2018, land acquisition and resettlement impacts; budget and other relevant information. C. Measures Carried Out to Minimize Impacts 8. The RHD and the PIC have carefully assessed and studied the proposed changes from the Project’s original contract’s scope of works when the design for the new SMVT lane and other relevant structures were designed and proposed to MORTB and ADB for approval. Consultations have been done with the technical team at the site consisting of the PIC, contractors, and had been discussed with RHD and Project Implementation Committee.

9. Existing road reserve (land) will be used as much as possible where available to 2 accommodate the additional lanes and straightening the sharp bends in the JCTE road. In areas where there is no more available land for road widening due to high-rise commercial buildings and factories especially in WP-01, flyovers have been proposed instead of road widening which would require more land to be acquired. New SMVT lanes and structures will be constructed on road sides with minimal land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) impacts. Extensive consultations had been conducted with the affected communities and people, and other stakeholders to inform them about the new project scope (SMVT lane and structures), encourage them to express their views and suggestions for the period June to September 2018.

D. Objective of the Supplementary Resettlement Plan 10. The primary objective of the supplementary RP is to improve, or at least maintain livelihoods and living standards of the affected households (AHs). It is designed to provide full compensation to all AHs whose assets, homes, shops and other structures will be affected by the proposed new SMVT lane and structures in the JCTE road. The RP also includes safeguard measures that need to be carried out to ensure that all affected persons/ households will be compensated at replacement cost based on the current market value for their respective losses. It also provides other mitigation measures including livelihood restoration program and other assistance for vulnerable groups affected by the project, at least as well off as they would have been in the absence of the project. E. Methodology to Assess Resettlement Impacts 11. Project impacts have been estimated based on the field survey (census andI OL survey) conducted in June to August2018 for all types of losses including land, structure, trees, etc. Prior to conducting these surveys, consultation meetings had been carried out with the local government authorities especially with the village heads, affected persons and other stakeholders to inform them about the project and the surveys that will be conducted. F. Project Affected Area 12. The proposed construction of new SMVT lane and project structures will affect settlements and business hubs in 17 mouzas in Gazipur and 53 in Tangail district. A total of 6,883 people (male 3,855 and female 3028) including land owners, residential and commercial structure owners, vendors, etc. will be affected, of which, 1,726 households will be physically displaced including 401 residential households. About 712 households will suffer economic displacement including landowners and common property resources (CPRs). 13. The results of data gathered from the surveys (census/ IOL) indicate that the improvement widening of SMVT and section wise from km 0+000-km 69.3 (Vogra intersection of Joydevpur to Elenga) will require some land acquisition in particular section due to construction of flyovers, underpasses or smoothing of the curve and widening of the road. A total of 1,562 TH owners (34.57 ha land) will lose their productive assets due to the project interventions. 14. In some sections of the alignment the RHD land is sufficient for widening of the road, so new Land acquisition will not be required in those sections. A total of 1,726 Project Affected Units (PAUs) along the 69.3 km road alignment were surveyed from which 401 residential households, 613 commercial enterprises, and 19 CPRs w i l l b e affected. Consideringt h e area of the affected structures, about 1,433,776 square feetin different categories of structures will be affected within the ROW. 15. Overall, a total of 1,726 entities have been identified as affected by the project including landowners, structure owners, CPR, etc. A total of 1,014 households are losing structure (both 3 residential and commercial) and remaining is losing land, only business with rental structure, etc. G. Socioeconomic Information and Profile of the Affected Households 16. A total of 1,707 households (HHs) are affected by the project’s ROW and the total affected population is 6,883. The average household size in the project area is 4.03, which is lower than the national average of 4.4 (BBS 2011). Of the 1,707 affected HHs, 1,646 (96.43%) is male headed and the remaining 61 (3.57%) is female headed HHs in four contract/ work packages. About 40% of the 6,883 affected population in the project area belongs to age group 30-45 years old, followed by those who belong to age group 15-30 years old which constitutes about one-fourth of the total affected population. 17. About 41% of the affected households is engaged in business and 33% of the affected households is engaged in service/ working in garment factories. Other primary occupations of the affected households are labourers (10%), agriculture/ farming (8.4%) and other jobs (4.9%). Of the 1,707 affected HHs, 56 (3.3%) are housewives and have no stable job or regular source of income. 18. About 40.00% of the affected HHs have a per capital income of BDT 84,001 to 96,000. The number of affected HHs with considerably low per capita income level of above BDT 120,000 is about 4.6%. According to the census, 46 households (HH) are living below the poverty line under per capita income per HH of less than BDT 72,000 per year. H. Information Disclosure, Consultation and Participation 19. Public disclosure and consultation meetings were carried out to obtain stakeholders in put to the project design and in assessing the impacts of the project from June to September 2018.The affected population expressed their full support to the project and provided opinion to get fair judgment about land acquisition, compensation, project scope and their expectations from the project. The stakeholders consulted are in favor of the proposed new SMVT lane and structures, however they suggested to minimize resettlement impacts, if still possible. They expect fair compensation without harassment and proper resettlement benefits of the affected households and persons irrespective of their title. Consultation will be continued during the implementation of the RP and the project as a whole. The supplementary RP will be uploaded in the ADB website. I. Project Impacts 20. Improvement of the JCTE 4-Lane Highway will ease traffic congestion and reduce travel time and improve the transport system in the project areas. Thus, will be convenient for the local people and communities, and road users. It will also reduce road accidents to a large extent due to inclusion of foot over bridges, underpasses, flyovers, etc. The proposed improvement of the JCTE4-Lane Highway will require acquisition of 34.57 ha of land. In addition to land acquisition, the proposed road improvement will require demolition of housing structure of 401 households and will also require displacing 613 commercial establishments. The project will affect a total of 6,883 people. The summary of project impacts for JCTE 4-Lane Highway is shown in the table below. Summary of Project Impacts No. Project Impact Total 1 Total quantity of land (ha) affected 34.57 2 Total Physically Displaced Households (Loss of Residential), 1,033 Commercial and Common Property Structures including TH & NTH) 3 Total Financially Displaced Households (only Loss of land) 693

4 4 Total commercial and business enterprises Households 613 5 Total Residential affected Households 401 6 Total community property (CPR) affected- Households 19 7 Total quantity of structure affected (in sq. ft.) 1,433,776 8 Total quantity of commercial structure affected (in sq. ft.) 871,591 9 Total quantity of Residential structure affected (in sq. ft.) 513,725 10 Total quantity of community property (CPR) affected (in sq. ft.) 48,460 11 Total no. of toilets affected 169 12 Total no. of tube wells affected 185 13 Total no. of trees on private land affected 12,274 14 Number of women headed HHs affected 61 15 Number of Vulnerable HHs affected (Female=82: Male =46) 128 16 Number of Wage Laborers 2,272 17 Number of Tenants 913 18 Total Title Holder Households 1562 19 Total Non-Title Holder Households 164 Source: Census/ IOL June-August 2018. Note: The impact may be changed after finalization of actual Right of Way (RoW), DCs’ joint survey and PAVC joint verification survey.

J. Indicative Cost and Budget 21. The total indicative budget for the implementation of the supplementary RP is about BDT 6,157 million (Six thousand one hundred fifty-seven million) equivalent to USD 74.71 million (1USD=82.42 BDT). Of this total amount, land acquisition alone will require an estimated more than $66.67 million (89.24% of the total budget) due to high value of land the detailed budget breakdown (calculation) is in Annex 6 presented per contract package. The indicative cost and budget for the implementation of the supplementary RP is shown below. 22. Indicative Cost and Budget No. Category of losses Total Indicative Budget (BD T) A Compensation for land 4,110,177,391 B Other Resettlement Benefits for land 270,266,588 C Compensation for structure 1,318,972,071 D Resettlement Benefits related to loss of Structure 37,663,925 E Compensation for Tube-well and Toilet 9,239,000 F Compensation for Trees 65,663,230 G Loss of Fruits 7,363,737 H Resettlement Benefits for business loss 25,528,950 I Resettlement Benefits for wage labors 53,775,000 J Resettlement Benefits for tenants and others 21,760,900 Total (BDT) 5,920,41 0,791 Allocation for unforeseen Cost for DCs’ administrative cost, 236,816,432 GRC cases, LA support cost, ddocumentations cost for disbursement of compensation and resettlement, statistical and other uncertainties 4% of the total. Gr and Total 6,157,22 7,223 Source: Property valuation survey, recent development projects and policy matrix of the RP (refer to detailed ccalculation / budget in Annex-5)

K. Institutional Arrangement for the Supplementary RP 23. The RHD assisted by the Project Implementation Consultants (PIC) is primarily responsible for preparing the supplementary RP. RHD will be assisted by the NGO to be engaged by RHD to implement the activities/ process relevant to RP, and the PIC resettlement specialists. Coordination will be done at all levels, at the project field units and headquarters of RHD. The indicative implementation schedule for the supplementary RP is shown in the table below.

5 Indicative Implementation Schedule No. RP R elated Tasks/ Activities Start Finish 1 Census/ Inventory of Losses and SES June 18 August 18 2 Data entry/ processing and analysis of survey results August 18 Sept 18 3 Preparation of Supplementary RP Sept 18 October 18 4 Review of draft supplementary RP by RHD 14Oct18 16Oct 18 5 Submission of draft supplementary RP to ADB 16Oct 17Oct 18 6 Revision of supplementary RP after ADB review, and ADB Oct 18 Nov 18 approval 7 Design and reproduction of RP Informantion Booklet Dec 18 Dec 18 8 Ddisclosure and public consultations of approved RP Jan 18 31May20 9 LAPs submitted to DC 16Sept18 30Nov 18 10 Carry out LA by DCs (DLAC or CLAC, issue of notice 30Sept 18 31Aug 19 under Section 4, joint verification by AB and RHD/INGO, Notice under Section7, Section8. Preparation of budget and Notice. 11 Release of funds for payment of compensation to DC 1Feb19 30June19 By RHD 12 Cash compensation under law (CCL) 7Feb19 31May20 13 Payment of additional compensation/ resettlement 1Apr19 15June20 benefits to squatters and landowners 14 Civil works able to start early where the sites are free of 15Feb19 As per encumbrances. (RHD can start this process after joint contract. verification survey) 15 Recruitment of RP implementing NGO 20Sept 18 30June20 16 Formation and selection of members for committees Already formed by (PAVC, GRC) Ministry 17 Deployment and orientation of INGO staff. Mobilization of 20Sept18 21Sept18 PIU p ersonnel 18 Design and carry out property valuation survey by 30Sept18 30Aug19 property assessment and Valuation committee (PAVC) 19 Determination of individual entitlement 15 Oct18 30Dec19 (issuance of ID Cards. Indents etc.) 20 Finalization of compensation and Resettlement budget 1 Feb19 31Dec19 based on PAVC findings and submit to RHD for approval 21 Approval of budget by RHD 15Mar19 15Jan20 22 Monitoring/reporting results of RP implementation Semi annual Note: The schedule will be updated after ADB approval of the supplementary RP.

L. Monitoring and Evaluation, and Reporting 24. The responsibility for carrying out the monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and reporting will lie with the Additional Project Director as the Chief Resettlement Officer (CRO) for the project. Monitoring will continue until the end of RP implementation. Components of monitoring will include performance monitoring, i.e., physical progress of the work and impact monitoring and evaluation. Internal monitoring will be carried out by the RHD while the Project Implementation Consultants (PIC) resettlement specialists will conduct periodic monitoring and evaluation of RP implementation and prepare reports and will recommend necessary changes to the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and the Social and Environmental Circle (SEC) for consideration. 25. The Office of the project Director (PD) will be responsible to oversee proper and timely implementation of all RP related activities; will operate and manage RP implementation with the assistance if the implementing NGO (INGO), and with support from the Field Offices. The INGO will prepare monthly and period reports on the progress of the RP implementation. An automated MIS or database will be designed and developed by the INGO to facilitate efficient and effective monitoring of the output indicators at the RHD both at the field Level and headquarters levels. The PIC Resettlement Specialists shall perform tasks related to external 6 monitoring and evaluation and reporting on a semi annual, mid-term and final evaluation; will recommend necessary changes to the PIU and the SEC for consideration. The scope of external monitoring will cover compliance monitoring and social impact evaluation of RP implementation. 26. For reporting requirements, RHD will submit a semi-annual monitoring (SMR) to ADB within 30 days of end of the cycle. This will be prepared by RHD assisted by the PIC resettlement specialists. The INGO will prepare a monthly progress report (MPR) tobe submitted with 10 days of the following month. An annual progress report will be prepared as per monitoring program of the RP implementation, focused on land acquisition and resettlement key issues, challenges and recommendations and will be submitted within 60 days of the end of the year. This will be prepared by the PD/ DPD/CRO. A final report focused on project achievements, key issues and actions taken, project impacts/ outcome, lessons learned and recommendations will be prepared by the PIC for submission to RHD/ ADB within 60 days of end of the project.

7 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Background of the Project 1. The South Asia Sub regional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) Road Connectivity Project (the Project 2) has three major components (or sub projects), namely: (i) improvement of the 70 km length of the Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail- Elenga (JCTE) Road to a 4-Lane Highway; (ii) construction of a new RHD Headquarters Building at Tejgaon, , and (iii) improvement of and Burimari Land Port. The first two components are being implemented by the Roads and Highways Department (RHD), under the Ministry of Road Transport and Bridges (MORTB), of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. The third component is implemented by the Bangladesh Land Port Authority (BLPA). 2. The Government of Bangladesh (GoB) has received financial assistance for the implementation of the Project from the following financing institutions (i) Asian Development Bank (ADB), (ii) OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID) and (iii) Abu Dhabi Fund for Development (ADFD). The RHD is the Project’s implementing agency (IA) and the sponsoring Ministry/ Division is the MORTB of the GOB. Subsequent to the effectiveness of the ADB loan from 28 February 2014, RHD has engaged the services of a Project Implementation Consultant (PIC) 3 starting 16 March 2014 for the loan implementation, construction and supervision of the Project (all components). 3. The objectives of the project is to help the GoB and its people in achieving economic development and poverty reduction through improvement of transport efficiency and strengthening integrated road network by linking the national, regional and district roads. The JCTE Road will enhance the connectivity or access to 9 districts in the western part of the country and adjacent areas. The Project’s impact is increased domestic and regional trade through Bangladesh, and the project outcome is sustainable enhancement of international and domestic road connectivity. 4. The main component of the Project is to upgrade about 70 km of the JCTE road to a 4-Lane Highway with safety features including separate lanes for Slow Moving Vehicular Traffic (SMVT) to significantly increase the capacity and safety of this highway section, which provides a vital link to the National Highway network. The previous 2-lane highway has no divider between two opposite direction traffic nor separate lane for slow moving vehicles, which often gets severely congested and also poses significant threats to road safety. This explains why the 2-lane highway was proposed for a 4-lane highway under the Project. 4

5. The original Development Project Proposal (DPP) was prepared in 2012 based on a Feasibility Study conducted in 2010 to 2011. The Feasibility Study was conducted under the Priority Roads Project funded by ADB, aimed at improving the internal road corridor of Bangladesh. The JCTE road was later selected as a subregional connectivity corridor, and was decided later that this road will be improved as an international standard road corridor. The design of the road was prepared under the Subregional Road Transport Project Preparatory Facility which was focused on the development of Regional Connectivity Corridor. Thus, the design prepared during the Feasibility Study stage was modified accordingly. It is also significant to note that there were recent cases of road crush or vehicular accidents in the corridor. The road safety features have been considered in the proposed revised design and cost estimates have been reflected in the Revised DPP prepared by RHD in February 2018.

2The Project refers to the SASEC Road Connectivity Project which includes the original scope of works as designed for the Project. 3Project Implementation Consultants engaged by RHD for the loan implementation, construction supervision includes the following: Kunhwa Engineering & Consulting Co. Ltd (South Korea) as the lead firm in Joint Venture with KCI (South Korea) and ICT (India), and in association with DDC (Bangladesh). 4Ibid. 8 6. The Project was designed in compliance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 principles in managing Involuntary Resettlement (IR) such as avoiding IR wherever possible; minimize IR by exploring project and design alternatives; enhance, or at least improve the living standards of the people especially those affected by the Project by restoring the livelihoods of the displaced or affected persons/households (HHs) and other vulnerable persons. There were two RPs prepared for the Project (i) Improvement of JCTE Road (N-4) and (ii) Construction of RHD Headquarters Building at Tejgaon, Dhaka). No RP was prepared for the improvement of Benapole and Burimari Land Ports, being situated within a government property (BLPA), and no LAR impacts were assessed during the Project’s feasibility and detailed design stages. 7. The Resettlement Plan for Project component No.1: Improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway was prepared in February 2014 based on the original design for the Project during the design stage in 2011 to 2012. The RP (February 2014) was approved by ADB and MORTB, and uploaded in ADB website. RHD has engaged the services of Christian Commission for Development in Bangladesh (CCDB) as the implementing NGO (INGO) for the two RPs prepared on the Project which commenced on 12 February 2014. The PIC’s resettlement specialist work closely with RHD and the INGO to ensure that necessary safeguard measures are implemented/ addressed and in accordance with the approved RP. The implementation of the RP (Feb 2014) for the JCTE road is still in progress. 8. For the construction of additional Slow-Moving Vehicle Traffic (SMVT) Lane in both sides of the JCTE road other structures (i.e., 5 flyovers at Gorai, Kaliakoir, Naojuri, Chafipur and Chandra loop; 13 new underpasses, bridges and culverts) would require additional land acquisition and right-of way (ROW). Existing road under the Project under Contract Packages (WP-01 to WP-04) has been improved and with construction still in progress in some road sections. The road in Mirzapur headquarters and Tangail district town is situated in a built-up section with commercial areas and factories on both sides of the road. Construction of the new SMVT lane and other structures will affect additional settlements, land, common property resources (CPRs) and business establishments in 17 mouzas in Gazipur and 53 mouzas in Tangail district. This would require preparation of a supplementary RP for the improvement of the JCTE road. 5

B. Project Location and Current Progress 9. The JCTE 4-Lane Highway passes through two districts (Gazipur and Tangail). Gazipur District (Vogra to Elenga) is located on the North Central region of Bangladesh. It has a total population of about 2,031,891 6 and a land area of 1,741.53 sq. km and will affect two Upazila (Joydevpur and Kaliakoir). The second district covered by the Project is Tangail which has a total population of over 3,605,083 (including 1,847,713 or 51.25% female). 7 10. There are five (5) upazila located along the JCTE road (Mirzapur, Delduar, Basail, Tangail Sadar and ) that will be benefited by the Project. As of end of August 2018, the overall cumulative physical progress or achievement of the improvement of JCTE road in four contract work packages (WPs) is 73.10% (as per original contract) cumulative since construction commenced in 2014. 11. Table 1 shows the status of the seven construction packages (WPs) under the PIC’s

5Supplementary RP to the original RP for the improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway approved in February 2014.

6 Bangladesh Statistics Agency, 2005.

7Ibid.

9 scope of works. Under the Project’s original scope of works, the signed contract with the ccontractors for WP-01, WP-02 and WP-03 will be completed on 29 December 2018. There is one-year defect liability period after project completion, thus the contracts will expire on 29 December 2019. For WP-04, the cconstruction of the original scope of works (contract) commenced on 1 March 2016 and will be completed on 28 February 2019, and expiry date of the defect liability period be on 28 February 2020.8 Table 1: Status of the Seven Construction Packages under the PIC’s 9 Scope of Work Expir y Date Physical of Defect Progress (%) Date of Scheduled Liability (per RDPP) Contract Commence Date of Period (As Cumulative up to Package (WP) 30 June2018) ment Completion per Proposed Variation) SASEC-RCP/ICB/ 30 Dec2015 29 Dec 2018 29 Dec 2020 37.79% W-01 (LotWP-01)

SASEC-RCP/ICB/ 30 Dec2015 29 Dec2018 29 Dec 2020 50.02% W-01(Lot WP-02)

SASEC-RCP/ICB/ 30 Dec2015 29 Dec 2018 29 Dec 2020 44.17% W-01(Lot WP-03)

SASEC-RCP/ICB/ 1 March2016 28 Feb 2019 28 Feb 2021 36.28% W-02 (Lot WP-04)

SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-03 28 June 2015 27 June2018 27 March 60.00 % 2020 Burimari Land Port 09 Nov 2015 31 Jan 2018 31 Jan 2019 100.00%

Benapole Land Port 27 June 2016 31 Aug 2018 31 Aug 2019 85.5 %

Source: Revised DPP, RHD. Feb. 2018.

12. Figure 1 shows the SASEC Road Connectivity Project: Improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway component C. Rationale for the Supplementary Resettlement Plan 13. The preparation of a supplementary RP is required by ADB for the proposed new SMVT lane and structures relevant to the Project component: Improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway. This supplementary RP has been formulated in accordance with ADB’s SPS 2009 on Involuntary Resettlement, and will be reviewed and approved by the ADB prior to its implementation. 14. It can be recalled that the original development Project Proposal (DPP) was prepared in 2012 based on a Feasibility Study conducted in 2010 to 2011 under the Priority Roads Project funded by ADB, which aimed at improving the internal road corridor in the country. The JCTE was selected as a Sub-regional connectivity corridor and it was decided to be improved as an International Standard road corridor. There were changes made on the original design that was based on the Feasibility Stage in 2010 to 2011. Changes on the original design had also considered recent trends of road crush incidents in the corridor thus, road safety features have been integrated in the proposed revised design. The revised DPP has been approved by MORTB including the proposed budget.

8Ibid. 9SASEC Road Connectivity Project, Revised Development Project Proposal (RDPP). July 2018. 10 15. As stated in the revised DPP (February 2018), the following are the proposed improvements and/ or changes under the new SMVT lane and other structures to be constructed along the JCTE road. These were recommended by the Project Implementation Committee (PIC) and the costs have been included in the revised BoQ for the respective Contract Packages, and were used as the basis for assessing new safeguard (land acquisition and resettlement impacts). 10 Figure1: Project Location Map

Source: RHD/PICt, Sept. 2018. 16. There are five new flyovers to be constructed at Gorai, Kaliakor, Naojuri, Shafipur and Chandra loop; 13 new underpasses with a total length of 103.7 m; several new bridges with a total length of 2,809 meters combined in various locations; and new culverts with a total length of 427.245 meters will be constructed in identified locations along the JCTE road. This would require additional land acquisition and new right-of-way (ROW), and will affect settlements and business hubs in 17 mouzas in Gazipur district and 53 mouzas in Tangail district. 11 17. Table 2 shows the summary of description and location of the proposed new SMVT lane and structures proposed under the additional scope of works for the Project.

10 RHD. RDPP, February 2018.

11 CCDB. Draft Report (Sept. 2018) based on Census/IOL conducted in July-August 2018)

11 Table 2: Summary Description and Location of the Proposed New SMVT Lane and Structures No. Description of Proposed Design/ Structures Location (in Chainage) 1 In WP-01 to WP-04: Improvement/ widening of SMVT and section wise from Vogra intersection of Joydevpur to Elenga (WP-01 to WP-04) would require land acquisition JCTE Road due to construction of flyovers, underpasses and other (0+000 - 69.3 km) structures. Proposed new SMVT Lane has a width of about 4.2 m on one side of the JCTE road. 2 In WP - 02: Inclusion of Flyover near ICT Park at 18+924-19+194 Kaliakoir (L=270 m excluding ramp) at Ch (Kaliakoir) 18+924-19+194 and Gorai Flyover (L= 411.15 m 26+639.71-27+050+869 excluding ramp) at Ch. 26+639.71 - 27+050+868 under (Gorai) Contract package SASEC -RCP/ICB/W -01(WP -02) 3 In WP -01: Inclusion of a 945 m long Flyover at Shafipur 12+223-13+169 at Ch. 12+223 - 13+169; and a 290 m Flyover atNaojuri (Shafipur) at Ch. 02+500 - 02+787.5 under Contract Package 02+500-02+787.5 SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-01(WP -01) (Naojuri) 4 In WP-01: Chandra Loop, Inclusion of 462 meter additional 16+570-17+040 loops (Tangail-Chandra-Nabinagar) in Chandra Flyover. (Chandra Loof) 5 In WP-01: Three (3) Separate SMVT bridges/ for Kodda-1 (Ch. 3+594) Kodda-1, Kodda-2 and Bymail to make SMVT lane Kodda-2 (Ch. 4+174) & effectively workable, and are required on one side. Bymail Bridge (Ch. 5+272) 6 In WP-04: Relocation of Gharinda flyover to Rabna Rabna junction under SASEC -RCP/ICB/W -02(WP -04) (Ch. 63+640 km ) Inclusion of Underpasses along JCTE road with a total 1) Kaliakoir Pass: 7 length of 103.7 m (combined) in various locations. Ch. 21+460 2) Voteghor Bazar  Proposed 5 road crossing facilities for SMVT and Ch. 28+240 3) Dewhata Bazar  Proposed 8 road crossing channels (or pedestrian Ch. 31+840 crossings) instead of foot-over bridges) 4) Mirzapur Bypass Ch. 34+355 Note: 4 underpasses are located in WP-02; 5)Kurni BazarCh. 37+860 8 underpasses in WP-03; and 6) KadimDholla Bazar 1 in WP-04 Ch. 40+490 7) Jamurki Bazar Ch. 44+000 8) Nataipara Bazar Ch. 49+400 9) BaoikholaCh. 49+400 10) Korotia Hut Bypass Ch. 54+250 11) Basail Tea Junction Ch. 56+060 12) Tarutia School Ch. 57+130 and 13) Tangail Bypass GharindaCh. 60+780 8 Additional new bridges in various locations with a total Various locations length of 2,809 meters (combined for all) (refer to Table 3 for details) 9 New culverts to be constructed with a total length of Various locations 427.245 (combined) (refer to Table 4 for details) Source: RDPP, February 2018 18. The technical specifications of the proposed new SMVT lane and additional relevant to the Project’s JCTE road are described below. These are including in the revised DPP approved by RHD in February 2018, and has been submitted to ADB and MTRB.

12 (a) Proposed new SMVT lane and other structures on both sides of the JCTE road from Ch. 0+000 to 69+300 km and separate SMVT bridges for Kodda-1, Kodda-2 and Bymail under WP-01 12 19. As shown in Figure 2, the typical road cross section for the proposed new or additional SMVT lane has a width of about 4.2 meters on one side of the JCTE road. Large number of fast-moving vehicles (i.e., bus, truck, covered van, car and mini/micro bus) ply on this section resulting one of the busiest highways in the country. Likewise, other slow-moving vehicles like combined natural gas (CNG) operated vans; rickshaw and cart also regularly ply on this section using the same track of the highway.

20. Fast- and slow-moving vehicles on the same vehicle track resulted to heavy traffic jam, waste of time spent in delayed travel hours due to heavy traffic jam and increase in vehicular accidents and some were fatal road accidents. The JCTE road provides a vital link to the highway networks. To address these concerns, the PIC had proposed for the construction of separate lanes for slow moving vehicles on both sides of the main road to reduce congestion and avoid vehicular road accidents. This separate lane is termed as Slow-Moving Vehicular Traffic (SMVT) lane. When SMVT lanes are constructed on both sides of the highway there would be insignificant or no inter-lapping between fast moving and slow-moving vehicles. 13

21. The proposed segregation of separate SMVT lane requires construction of separate bridge over the waterways along with the other bridges which cater to main fast-moving traffic flow. In SASEC Road Connectivity Project, about 51.1 km of road comprising of Contract WP-02, WP-03 and WP-04 have already accommodated the SMVT lane on one side only with provision of separate SMVT bridge. However, in one side SMVT lane scenario, slow moving vehicles still need to cross the road to get into the SMVT lane which may still be a threat to road safety. The GOB has banned slow moving vehicles for using the national highways since 2015 which justifies the necessity to construct SMVT on both sides of the JCTE road. The new SMVT lane on the other side of the road has been proposed in the revised DPP. 14

22. In Contract Package (WP-01) with a total length of about 18.9 km, SMVT lanes are provided on both sides of the road. At three bridge locations, namely (i) Kodda-1 at Ch. 3+594; (ii) Kodda 2 at Ch. 4+174; and (iii) Bymail at Ch. 5+272SMVT Bridge has been provided on one side of the road only. There is a need to construct separate SMVT Bridges on the other side of these bridges to make the SMVT lane effectively workable.

23. There is provision of both sides SMVT for full length of SASEC Road Connectivity Project II: Improvement of Elenga-Hatikamrul--Rangpur Road which is useful for connectivity of 16 districts with Dhaka. The portion from Joydevpur to Elenga Road is being used by vehicles for connecting more than 20 Districts and vehicles that ply in this route oftentimes experience heavy traffic jam due to slow moving vehicles. Thus, it is essential to have SMVT lane on both sides of the JCTE road. 24. Table 3 shows the list of proposed bridges (with a total length of 2,809 meters in all bridges) to be constructed under the new SMVT lane and structure. The data below also shows the village name, specific location (in chainage) and remarks for those bridges proposed for the new SMVT.

12 Changes on the length and location (in Chainage were updated by the PIC, October 2018). 13 RHD. RDPP, February 2018. 14 Ibid. 13 Table 3: List of Bridges to be Constructed Under the New SMVT & Structures

Contrac Village Name Chainage Length Span Lane Comments t No. (m) No. No. (Remarks) Kodda Bridge-1 3+556 70 2 3 Original Scope Kodda Bridge -2 4+109 121 5 3 Original Scope Bymail Bridge 5+208 121 5 3 Original Scope WP-01 SMVT Kodda 3+556 70 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge -1 SMVT Kodda 4+09 121 5 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge-2 SMVT Bymail Bridge 5+208 121 5 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Lotifour Bridge 20+232 60 2 3 Original Scope SMVT Lotifour Bridge 20+232 60 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane North Hijoltoli Bridge 22+079 50 2 3 Original Scope SMVT North Hijoltoli 22+079 50 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge Tansutra Bridge 23+855 50 2 5 Original Scope WP-02 Sohagpur Bridge 28+551 72.9 3 3 Original Scope SMVT Sohagpur 28+551 72.9 3 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge Dewhata -2 Bridge 31+345 48.6 2 3 Original Scope SMVT Dewhata-2 31+345 48.6 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge Dewhata -3 Bridge 32+189 50 2 2 In original scope there was 3 SMVT Dewhata-3 32+189 50 2 1 lane bridge which is splitted Bridge into two Post Kumari Bridge 34+944 30 1 3 Original Scope SMVT Post Kumari 34+944 30 1 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge SMVT Dewhata-3 32+189 50 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge Subolia Bridge 38+389 31.90 1 3 Original Scope SMVT Subolla Bridge 38+389 31.900 1 3 Proposed for new SMVT lane RHS WP-03 Aklimtola Bridge 41+878 42.85 2 2 In original scope there was SMVT Aklimtola 41+878 42.85 2 1 3 lane bridge which will is Bridge splitted into two SMVT Aklimtola 41+878 42.85 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS Pakulla Bridge 42+975 37.17 1 5 Original Scope Jamorki Bridge 44+371 49.45 2 3 Original Scope SMVT Jamorki 44+371 49.450 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS Amlapara Bridge 47+284 16.5 1 3 Original Scope SMVT Allapara 47+284 15.500 1 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS Kobotabai Bridge 52+736 21.4 1 3 Original Scope SMVT Kobotabai 52+736 21.400 1 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane BridgeRHS Madordhoni Bridge 53+683 45.85 2 3 Original Scope SMVT Madordhoni 53+683 45.850 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS Kharjana Bridge 54+704 61.45 2 3 Original Scope SMVT Kharjana 54+704 61.450 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS Ampur Bridge 56+476 20 1 3 Original Scope SMVT Ampur Bridge 56+476 20.00 1 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane RHS Kandila SMVT Bridge 61+921 21 1 1 In original scope there was 3 LHS lane bridge which is splitted Kandila 2-Lane 61+921 21 1 2 into two Bridge RHS Kandila New SMVT 61+921 21 1 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS

14 Shibpur 3-Lane 62+999 21 1 3 Original Scope Bridge LHS WP-04 Shibpur New SMVT 62+999 21 1 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge RHS Bikromhati 3-Lane 64+551 104.05 4 8 Original Scope Bridge I RHS Bikromhati New 64+551 104.05 4 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane SMVT Bridge I RHS Bikromhati 3-Lane 65+200 52 2 3 Original Scope Bridge II RHS Bikromhati New 65+200 52 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane SMVT Bridge II LHS Rosulpur 3-Lane 66+020 42 2 3 Original Scope Bridge RH Rosulpur New SMVT 66+020 42 2 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge LHS Poulie 3 Lane Bridge 67+279 131.05 5 3 Original Scope RHS Palu SMVT Bridge 68+697 57 3 1 In Original Scope there was 3 RHS lane bridge which is splitted Palu 2-Lane Bridge 68+697 57 3 2 into two LHS Palu New SMVT 68+697 57 3 1 Proposed for new SMVT lane Bridge LHS Total Length of Bridges 2809 Source: 2 nd Revised Development Project Proposal (RDPP), February 2018. Appendix p. 52. Note: RHS = right hand side; LHS = left hand side; SMVT = slow moving vehicular traffic 25. Additional culverts with a total length of 427.245 meters will also be constructed in the proposed new SMVT lane in various locations. Table 4 shows the list of culverts to be constructed presented by location (in chainage), contract package, length and remarks (if both sides of the SMVT lane, new culvert, etc).

Table 4: List of Culverts to be Constructed Under the SMVT Lane and Structures

SI. No. Contract Chainage Length Along Vent Comments (Remarks) No. the Road (m) No. 1 00+246 3.00 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 2 00+543 3.00 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 3 00+940 3.00 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 4 01+632 3.00 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 5 02+223 3.100 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 6 03+266 1.500 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 7 08+905 4.500 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 8 13+002 1.500 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 9 13+239 5.00 1 with both side of SMVT culvert

10 14+099 2.00 1 with both side of SMVT culvert

11 14+404 3.400 1 with both side of SMVT culvert

12 14+730 1.500 1 with both side of SMVT culvert WP-01 13 15+148 2.000 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 14 16+657 4.000 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 15 17+272 5.500 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 16 18+211 1.500 1 with both side of SMVT culvert 17 02+552 0.450 1 Pipe culvert (New) 18 02+765 1.00 1 New culvert 19 03+268 1.500 1 New culvert 20 09+848 1.500 1 New culvert 21 10+200 2.00 1 New culvert 22 11+290 1.500 1 New culvert 23 13+685 1.600 1 New culvert 24 15+531 1.500 1 New culvert 25 15+700 2.000 1 New culvert 26 16+444 1.4880 1 New culvert 27 17+568 2.00 1 New culvert 15 28 17+990 1.500 1 New culvert 29 18+455 1.00 1 New culvert 30 21+577 1.5 1 with both side SMVT culvert 31 22+646 5.49 1 with both side SMVT culvert 32 23+307 11.321 2 with both side SMVT culvert 33 24+060 7 1 with both side SMVT culvert 34 25+604 5.92 1 with both side SMVT culvert 35 26+027 5.47 1 with both side SMVT culvert 36 26+986 2.5 1 with both side SMVT culvert 37 WP-02 27+683 6.42 1 with both side SMVT culvert 38 28+904 29.724 3 with both side SMVT culvert 39 29_288 5.47 1 with both side SMVT culvert 40 29+859 20.2 4 with both side SMVT culvert 41 30+303 20.1 4 with both side SMVT culvert 42 30+656 6.478 1 with both side SMVT culvert 43 20+848 2.4 1 New culvert 44 24+695 2.437 1 New culvert 45 21+400 3.095 1 New culvert 46 29+978 1.9 1 New culvert 47 30+170 1.9 1 New culvert 48 37+454 19.80 3 with both side SMVT culvert 49 38+912 10.05 2 with both side SMVT culvert 50 39+573 5.30 1 with both side SMVT culvert 51 40+374 5.40 1 with both side SMVT culvert 52 43+504 5.30 1 with both side SMVT culvert 53 44+721 10.20 2 with both side SMVT culvert 54 45+498 5.30 1 with both side SMVT culvert 55 WP-03 46+066 11.20 2 with both side SMVT culvert 56 47+842 5.30 1 with both side SMVT culvert 57 49+210 2.80 1 with both side SMVT culvert 58 50+211 10.05 2 with both side SMVT culvert 59 51+317 10.05 2 with both side SMVT culvert 60 53+917 2.40 1 with both side SMVT culvert 61 55+196 6.10 1 with both side SMVT culvert 62 56+679 3.37 1 with both side SMVT culvert 63 57+896 4.82 1 with both side SMVT culvert 64 58+272 13.10 2 with both side SMVT culvert 65 58+731 2.30 1 with both side SMVT culvert SI. No. Contract Chainage Length Along Vent Comments (Remarks) No. the Road (m) No. 66 59+433 9.25 2 with both side SMVT culvert 67 59+963 9.25 2 with both side SMVT culvert 68 60+333 5.30 1 with both side SMVT culvert 70 WP-04 61+184 5.90 1 with both side SMVT culvert 71 63+060 2.70 1 with both side SMVT culvert 72 62+694 2.70 1 with both side SMVT culvert 73 64+056 13.55 4 with both side SMVT culvert 74 66+460 10.30 3 with both side SMVT culvert 75 68+449 10.30 3 with both side SMVT culvert 76 9+148 9.25 2 with both side SMVT culvert Total Length of 427.245 Culverts Source: Revised Development Project Proposal (RDPP), February 2018. Appendix, pp. 53-54.

Figure 2: Original Road Cross Section and Proposed Road Cross Section (New Construction)

16

Source: RHD. Revised Development Project Proposal, February 2018

26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32.

17 33. A total of five flyovers are proposed under the new SMVT lane and other structures. Three new flyovers are proposed in Shafipur (945 m in total length), Chandra Loof (462 m in total length), Naojuri (290 m in total length), Kaliakoir (270 m in total length) and Gorai (411.15 m in total length) in various locations.

(b) Under WP-02: Inclusion of Flyover near ICT Park at Kaliakoir (L=270 m excluding ramp) at Ch 18+924-19+194 and Gorai Flyover (L= 411.15 m excluding ramp) at Ch. 26+639.71 - 27+050+868 under Contract package SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-01(WP-02) 15

34. Construction of a flyover near the Communications Technology (ICT) Park at Kaliakoir, is vital for supporting the country’s development of information and technology. The concerned government agencies such as the Post and Telecommunication Department, Ministry of Posts, Telecommunication and Information Technology Division have requested to construct a fly-over for better and safe accessibility of pedestrian and vehicles to the ICT Park. The PIC recommends to construct a new 4- lane flyover at Kaliakoir to facilitate vehicles of JCTE Highway, where the ICT Park vehicles and pedestrians can easily use the road way underside the proposed fly-over and declares it as first track project.

35. The Gorai area under contract WP-02 is already saturated with growth of markets, factories and industries on both sides of the road. Traffic congestion has been compounded with the development of a junction which connects an industrial area and an important road to Shokhipur ashinterland. Traffic congestion at this junction has become a regular phenomenon, disrupting total traffic flow on both directions of the road towards Tangail and Joydevpur.

36. One 4 lane Fly-over (about 411.15 m length) is required at Gorai Junction between Ch. 26+639.71 - 27+050+868 under Contract package SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-01(WP-02) to solve the hazardous traffic disruption and severe congestion. The Project Implementation Committee recommends to construct an overpass at Gorai for free flow of Traffic on JCTE Highway as well as solving traffic congestion and hazard in the said location. (c) Under WP -01: Inclusion of a 945 m long Flyover at Shafipur at Ch. 12+223 - 13+169; and a 290 m Flyover at Naojuri at Ch. 02+500 - 02+787.5 under Contract Package SASEC-RCP/ICB/W-01(WP -01)

37. One fly-over from Ch. 6+543 km to Ch. 8+188 km (Length 1,645m) is already under construction at Konabari Industrial area. There is a ribbon growth of industries along the road from Konabari to Chandra, particularly at Shafipur where the growth is becoming denser with every passing day. One Flyover (about 945 m long) has become a necessity at Shafipur industrial area between Ch. 12+223 - 13+169 and another Flyover at Naojuri (about 290 m) at Ch. 02+500 - 02+787.5 for establishing uninterrupted traffic flow on the JCTE corridor.

38. Shafipur in WP- 01 is a highly dense industrial area and where the Shafipur, Ansar headquarters is situated. For this purpose, a number of additional underpasses are required to maintain uninterrupted traffic flow on JCTE Highway and provide safe crossings of side road traffic. In the feasibility report, the requirement of underpass was mentioned but later on it was omitted in the design phase. It is observed that it is better to construct a flyover in this area instead of providing numerous underpasses within 800m road length.

39. Another traffic congestion place is located at Naojuri at Ch. 12+223 - 13+169 km. This is the intersection with end point of Dhaka Bypass Project road and Gazipur- Tangail road. A

15 Changes on the length and location (in Chainage were updated by the PIC, October 2018). 18 flyover is extremely needed at this junction to avoid the traffic congestion created by three directional highway traffic. (d) Inclusion of 460 meter additional loops (Tangail- Chandra- Nabinagar) in Chandra Flyover at Ch. 16+000 km.

40. During execution of physical works, it becomes apparent that construction of additional loops and flyovers at most vulnerable and critical road locations and junctions will solve traffic clogging, facilitate faster traffic movement and smoothness. At Chandra, (Ch. 16+000 km.) one additional loop offsetting from the under-construction Chandra flyover will solve traffic congestion in and out of the junction.

41. There is a provision of flyover at Chandra to cater thorough traffic from Gazipur to Tangail and vice versa. But still traffic at ground level (at grade) at Chandra will face conflict to a significant extent even after opening of the proposed flyover. An additional two lane SMVT/ pedestrian crossing facilities by means of an underpass will also be provided which will ensure safe and uninterrupted traffic flow along with Nabinagar-Tangail Direction. To eliminate the two-lane traffic conflict on `’at grade’’ level situated at Chandra Junction, an additional loop is required which will carry traffic from Tangail to Nabinagar without any interruption. The PIC has recommended the inclusion of one additional loop from Tangail end towards Nabinagar to eliminate all conflicts at Chandra junction. Cost for this additional loop has been included in the revised BoQ of Contract WP-01 16

(e) Relocation of Gharinda flyover to Rabna underSASEC-RCP/ICB/W-02(WP-04)

42. The Contract scope includes a flyover at Gharinda. The purpose of this flyover is to facilitate traffic movement in between Tangail Town and . At present there is a narrow one lane sub-standard road connecting the rail Station with Tangail City. The present and projected railway bound traffic is mostly small vehicles, personal and slow-moving vehicles. An underpass may be sufficient instead of a flyover in this location to cater present and future traffic. Rabna junction at Ch. 63+640 km is the gateway to Tangail City. A good number of heavy and large traffic to and from Tangail use this intersection which causes traffic infringements on main stream traffic of JCTE road. One flyover (about 450m long) at Rabna junction will greatly solve traffic infringement at this vulnerable junction. 17

(f) Inclusion of Underpasses along JCTE Road 43. There are 5 road crossing facilities for SMVT and 8 road or pedestrian crossing channels instead of foot over bridges proposed at different locations in the form of underpass. These were included in the project scope. Absence of sufficient crossing facilities, the SMVT shall have to enter the main road for crossing the road which may trigger road crash and may reduce operational efficiency of the main highway. Cost estimates for these designs have been included in the revised BoQ for WP-02, WP-03 and WP-04. 18 Table 5 shows the location of the proposed underpasses in the project’s JCTE road.

Table 5: Proposed SMVT Underpasses in Various Locations Location Sl. No. (in Location Type of Underpass Chainage ) 01. Ch. 21+460 Kaliakoir Bypass SMVT Underpass 02. Ch. 28+240 Voteghor Bazar Pedestrian Underpass 03. Ch. 31+840 Dewhata Bazar Pedestrian Underpass 04. Ch. 34+355 Mirzapur Bypass SMVT Underpass

16 Revised DPP, February 2018. 17 Ibid. 18 Ibid. 19 05. Ch. 37+860 Kurni Bazar Pedestrian Underpass 06. Ch. 40+490 KadimDholla Bazar Pedestrian Underpass 07. Ch. 44+000 Jamurki Bazar Pedestrian Underpass 08. Ch. 46+910 Nataipara Bazar Pedestrian Underpass 09. Ch. 49+400 Baoikhola SMVT Underpass 10. Ch. 54+250 Korotia Hut Bypass Pedestrian Underpass 11. Ch. 56+060 Basail Tea Junction SMVT Underpass 12. Ch. 57+130 Tarutia School Pedestrian Underpass 13. Ch. 60+780 Tangail Bypass Gharinda SMVT Underpass Source: Revised DPP, RHD. February 2018.

D. Project Benefits and Impacts

44. The improvement of the JCTE road including the construction of the new SMVT lane and other structures will provide faster and easier access to road users, will strengthen road networks in the Central and Southeast part of the country, and adjacent areas, and strengthen domestic and economic trades in the region. The JCTE road is part of Asian Highway No. 2 and 41 SASEC Road Corridor Nos. 4 and 9, and provides vital links in the national Highway network. 45. The construction of new SMVT lane and other structures will ease or decongest the volume of traffic in built up areas with many commercial centers, markets, factories, mosques, schools and residential areas. Thus, travel time will be reduced, will result to more convenient travel, and time wasted while in traffic could be used for more productive activities such as economic activities, social and family related activities. These will also address road safety concerns; could save lives and economic losses by preventing vehicular accidents. These are aligned to the overall all goal of road improvement project which is to provide an efficient, safe and environmentally sustainable road transport in the region. 46. It is inevitable that in any development projects including road improvement projects, there are potential negative impacts that may arise. The construction of the new SMVT lane and additional structures would entail acquisition of private land or resumption of public land from private users. This will also result to additional number of affected person/ households, common property resources (CPRs), shops and other assets that will be affected due to the construction of the proposed SMVT lane and structures. These may result to loss of jobs either temporarily or permanently and displacement of people. 47. Necessary mitigation measures will be implemented to minimize and/ or mitigate negative impacts. Affected persons/ households will be provided compensation, and those considered as vulnerable groups will be provided livelihood restoration programs/ assistance. CPRs and other assets that will be affected will be compensated at replacement cost based on value assessed by an independent appraiser. E. Measures to Minimize Impact 41. The RHD and the PIC have carefully assessed and studied the proposed changes from the Project’s original contract’s scope of works when the design for the new SMVT lane and other relevant structures were designed and proposed to the MORTB and ADB for approval. Consultations have been done with the technical team at the site consisting of the PIC, contractors, and discussed with RHD and Project Implementation Committee. RHD, PIC and the Project Implementation Committee had conducted series of consultation meetings to discuss issues and concerns relevant to the ongoing construction of the JCTE road. These matters were also discussed with the ADB during meetings and review missions.

42. The design for the new SMVT lane and other structures includes provision for 6 numbers

20 of left to right or right to left turn crossing (Lane changing) which if constructed would require additional land beyond the original Development Project Proposal (DPP). Also, this would trigger rising of the Road level by almost 5 meters. To mitigate this problem, the PICs have studied and justified eliminating 5 lane changing crossings out of 6 locations, and proposed an SMVT Lane straight instead of moving across the main carriageway. The number of new bridges in those cases or locations were reduced from 3 lanes to 2 lanes. However, an additional SMVT lane in each location has to be constructed on the other side along the SMVT lane alignment. Also, changes in some individual work items have been proposed and included in the revised BoQ. 19

43.In WP-01, the number of culverts to be extended from the original contract is 18 which is inadequate as per field requirement and assessment by the PIC. The revised quantity of culverts proposed in the revised BoQ is 29 for this Contract. Likewise, the number of culverts to be extended in WP-02 has been increased to 18 from the original scope of 14. Some temporary road widening works near Chandra Intersection was also done in WP-01 June 2016 to minimize congestion on the eve of Eid-Ul-Fitr. Temporary widening of roads is also necessary at Shafipur Bazar. In WP-02, it was necessary to increase the length of piles as per recommendation of the Design Consultants in the revised design of some bridges following confirmatory sub soil investigation.

44. Existing road reserve (land) will be used as much as possible where available to accommodate the additional lanes and straitening the sharp bends. In areas where there is no more land area for road widening due to high-rise commercial buildings and factories especially in WP-01, flyovers have been proposed instead of road widening which would require more land to be acquired. New SMVT lanes and structures will be constructed on the road sides with minimal land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) impacts. This was considered in WP-02 to WP-04. Extensive consultations have been conducted with the affected communities and people in the Project are as to inform them about the proposed new SMVT lane and structures, encourage them to express their perception about the project and suggestions to project implementers during the road construction. F. Objectives of the Supplementary Resettlement Plan 45. The supplementary RP includes information on the changes in the designs and/or additional scope of works from the original scope of the Project. It also includes the data gathered from the inventory if losses (IOL) and socioeconomic survey (SES) for the affected households within the project area which will be affected by the proposed SMVT lane and other structures; land acquisition and resettlement impacts; budget and other relevant information. 46. The IOL/SES was conducted in June to August 2018 along the JCTE road sections affected by the proposed new SMVT lane and other structures. The designs of the new scope of works have been mostly finalized, and this would require clearing of encroachments in the existing right-of-way (ROW) and acquisition of additional land to allow construction to proceed. Concurrence to the new components of construction and administrative approval of land acquisition requirements has been agreed by the MORTB. 47. The supplementary RP addresses impacts on land, other assets and livelihoods resulting from the proposed new SMVT lane and structures such as bridges, flyovers, culverts, etc. along the JCTE road. Most of these are located in WP-02 to WP-04. The objective of the supplementary RP is to improve, or at least maintain livelihoods and living standards of

19 RHD. Revised DPP, February 2018.

21 affected households. 48. The supplementary RP is designed to provide full compensation to all Affected households (AHs) whose assets, homes, shops and other structures will be affected by the proposed new SMVT land and additional structures to be constructed in the JCTE road. Thus, ensures that all affected persons/ households will be compensated at replacement cost based on the current market value for their respective losses. It also provides other mitigation measures including livelihood restoration program and other assistance for vulnerable groups affected by the project, at least as well off as they would have been in the absence of the project. 49. The supplementary RP also establishes the provisions for payment of resettlement assistance to AHs, commercial and business enterprises (CBEs) and income restoration assistance to the poor and vulnerable households. It provides a description of socio-economic characteristics of AHs; set south the implementation schedule, and provides the budget and cost estimate for implementation. This RP will be reviewed, if necessary, during implementation stage and the budget will be revised to reflect any changes in numbers of affected households (AHs) or losses compared to those identified during the census and IOL as well as adjusting for any changes in inflation.

22

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT 50. This chapter focuses on the methodology used for preparing the supplementary RP; project impacts such as loss of land, structure and other assets based from the data gathered fromIOL and SES on the proposed location for the new SMVT lane and additional structures for the JCTE 4-Lane Highway, which would require additionalland aacquisition. A. Methodology for Preparing the Supplementary Resettlement Plan 51. Project impacts have been estimated based on the field survey (census and OL survey) carried out in June to August 2018 for all type of losses including land, structure, trees, etc. The objective of the IOL and SES includes the following (i) to establish a detailed inventory of the HHs and physical assets that will be affected by the project; and (ii) to develop a socio- economic profile of the affected households (AHs) and physically displaced persons (DPs). The main instrument used in data collection is a surveyquestionnaire for the IOL/ SES. The respondents were the affected households in communities along the JCTE road, where the new SMVT lane and other structures will be constructed. 52. Prior to conducting the census/ IOL, consultation meetings had been done with the local government authorities especially with the village heads, affected HHs/ persons and other stakeholders to inform them about the project, and purpose of the surveys. During consultation meetings, the cut-off date (commencement date of survey on 01June 2018) or any designated date declared by the RHD) for enlisting households was declared for the squatters and other unauthorized occupants encroaching on the ROW, and no new structures should be constructed after the cut-off date. 53. The cut-off datestated underSection4of the Government’s laws, the Acquisition and Requisition of the immovable Property Actof 2017, for legal owners of property to be acquired, shall take effect and/or be applied by the concerned Deputy Commissioner. Any persons moving in to the project area after the cut-off date will not be entitled for compensation from District Commissioners (DCs) or any assistance from RHD. 54. Video filming of the affected structures on the project ROW was carried out. leaflets in Bangla language were also distributed to the affected population. The leaflets contain informationabout the project, new scope of works such as SMVT lane and construction of structures, the purpose why a video is being conducted, cut-off date, entitlements/ assistance for the affected households and contact information should they have questions. 55. Each road section along the alignment was repeatedly checked and verified by the survey or during the IOL/SES. Plot schedule and Mouza Maps were followed to ensure actual ROW of the project and make aware of the people about the project needs in terms of land acquisition and displacement. The census and OL survey were conducted following the project ROW, draft Land Acquisition Plans (LAPs) and with assistancefrom the RHD. PIC’s Project Engineers/ survey team. 56. Land acquisition requirements have been estimated based on the Land Acquisition Plan (LAP) prepared by RHD. The adverse impactsassessed during the IOL/SES were related to land (residential, commercial and agricultural); structures (residential, commercial and CPR), income and livelihoods of affected households (as owners and/or wage earners). Implementation of the Project’s new SMVT land and construction of additional structures on the JCTE road also entails some in direct impacts such as loss of access to residential and 23 commercial structures, and loss of employment and workdays. 57. Identified impacts included are placement of households, shops, and community structures. Data gathered from the surveys were encoded in the electronic database which includes information about the AHs / APs by type and extent of impacts; land owners, displaced households ( D H s ) and the way they are impacted and losses that will incur. Based on the data gathered from the IOL, there will be a total of 401 residential households (HHs) who will be affected by the proposed new project scope. Likewise, atotal of2,272 wage laborers and913commercial tenants will lose theirprimary sources of income or livelihoodsdue to the proposed new SMVT lane and structures. The additional construction based on the proposed new SMVT lane and structures will affect 17 mouzas in Gazipur and 53 mouzas in Tangail districts. 58. Follow-up site visit was conducted by the PIC resettlement specialist and technical team together with the survey team that conducted the census/ IOL to validate the data by interviewing some of the local residents who will be affected by the new project scope (SMVT and structures), mosques and schools committee officers, and the RHD/ PIC technical team at the site (WP-01 to WP-04) on 30 September 2018. 59. Consultation through through focus group discussion (FGD), interview and meetings with concerned stakeholders were conducted. Information gathered are included under the section on consultation and participation, and disclosure. Pictures of the affected assets/ structures including common property resources (CPRs) were also taken at the site and these are included in the Annexure. 60. Further consultation was conducted in September-October 2018 with the RHD officers in-charge of land acquisition issues/ matters, the INGO (CCDB) team that conducted the IOL/SES, and the RHD/ PIC technical team who prepared the new project scope (SMVT lane and structures) that were included in the revised DPP, for verification of some technical specifications, budget and other data needed in the supplementary RP. B. Summary of Impacts of the New SMVT Lane and Structures Under the Project’s Improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway 61. The surveys indicate that t h e improvement widening of SMVT and section wise from km 0+000 to km 69.3 (Vogra intersection of Joydevpur to Elenga) will require some land acquisition in particular section due to construction of flyovers, underpasses or smoothing of the curve and widening of the road. A total of 1,562 TH owners (34.57haland) will lose their productive assets due to the project interventions. 62. In some area of the alignment the RHD land is sufficient for widening of the road, so new land acquisition will not be required for that particular sections. A total of 1,726 Project Affected Units (PAUs) along the 69.3 km road alignment were surveyed from which 401 residential households, 613 commercial enterprises, and 19 common property resources (CPRs) will be affected. Considering t h e area of the affected structures, about 1,433,776 square feet in different categories of structures have been affected within the ROW. 63. The physically displaced households include residential and commercial structure users, common property resources (CPRs) including title-holders (THs) and non-title holders (NTHs), etc. The wage laborers and tenants are not included in this list. Theywere separately treated as they are losing only livelihood. Financially displaced households include only the land owners. 64. Overall, a total of 1,726 entities have been identified as affected by the project including 24 landowners, structure owners, CPR, etc. A total of 1,014 households are losing structure (both residential land commercial) and remaining is losing land, only business with rental structure, etc. Table 6 presents the summary of land acquisition and resettlement impacts by type of impacts or loss. Table 6: Summary of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts (Displacements and Other Impacts)

No. Loss Type Work Package (WP) Total WP -01 WP -02 WP -03 WP -04 1 Total length of alignment 18.900 18.00 22.400 10.00 69.300 2 Total No. of Physically displaced house 53 427 494 59 1,033 holds 3 Total No. Pf Financially displaced 21 123 344 205 693 households 4 Total quantity of land (ha) affected 2.37 8.24 18.03 5.92 34.57 5 Total Residential Households affected 15 123 232 31 401 6 Total commerce and business 36 296 255 26 613 Enterprises (CBEs) affected 7 Total common property resources 2 8 7 2 19 (CPR ) aff ected 8 Total quantity of residential structure 27370 241822 218002 26531 513725 affected (in sqft) 9 Total quantity of commercial structure 113324 491039 243397 23831 871591 aff ected (in sq ft) 10 Total quantity of Common 2195 33094 12971 200 48460 Property Structure (in sqft) 11 Others type of structure (in no.) 56 195 165 39 455 12 Total no. of toilets affected 24 44 79 22 169 13 Total no. of tube wells affected 14 37 115 19 185 14 Total no. of trees on private land 160 1,258 7,391 3,465 12,274 15 Number of women headed HH 1 24 33 3 61 16 s Numberaffected of Wage Labors 260 1,095 870 47 2,272 17 Number of Tenants 95 471 320 27 913 18 Total Disconnection of Utilities (TH) 87 7 10 1 105 Source: Census June-August 2018 C. Scope of Land Acquisition 65. TheProject component, Improvement of the JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway will be carried out mainly using available previously acquired and. However, additional land will be required in some areas or sections, wherethe existing road reserve is not adequate to accommodate thenew SMVT and other structures. It would require about 34.57-hectare (ha) of private lands, of which the largest area is rom Tangail district (30.19 ha) andthe remaining4.38ha is covered by Gazipur district. As per IOL conducted (June to August 2018) and LAP, about34.57ha of land will be acquired from 1,562 TH households. Table 7 shows the land that will be required for the project’s new scope or works presented by district. Table7: Land by area Requirements Districts Land Percentage Acres Hecta res Gazipur 10.8321 4.38 12.67% Tanqail 74.5579 30 .19 87.33% Total 85.3900 34.57 100% Source: Administrative Approval of LAP.

25 66. Out of the total proposed land to be acquired for the JCTE4-Lane Highway, 18.03 ha is under WP-03); 8.24 ha in WP-02 and 5.92 ha in WP-04. The remaining 2.37 ha of land will be acquired in WP-01. As per census and IOL survey conducted, there were seven categories of land within the project ROW. The homestead land category tops the list with 64.16%, followed by agricultural used land which accounts for 34.53%for combined high and low crop land. The remaining 1.31% of land belongs to other land categories (see Table8).

Table8: Category of Land By Work Package Category of Land Quantity of land in acre No. WP-01 WP-02 WP-03 WP-04 Total % 1 Homestead/Viti 5.50 16.66 26.78 5.85 54.79 64.16 2 Kanda (Crop Land- high) 0 2.43 13.65 8.66 24.74 28.96 3 Nama/Nal (Crop Land–low) 0 1.03 3.60 0.12 4.75 5.57 4 Wet Land/Ditch (Doba) 0.26 0 0.09 0 0.35 0.41 5 Pond 0.10 0.24 0.40 0 0.74 0.86 6 Fallow Land (Khal) 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.02 7 Commercial used(shop) 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0.02 Mouza Total in acre 5.86 20.36 44.54 14.63 85.39 100 Total in Hectare 2.37 8.24 18.03 5.92 34.57 Source: Census June-August2018

67. The detailed lists of land to be acquired from Chainage 0+000 to 25+035 in Gazipur District and Chainage 25+035 to 69+300 in Tangail District is shown in Annex 3. The lists of LA (in acre) are presented by name of mouza, upazilla and in chainage had been prepared by the RHD/ PIC. 20 D. Affected Non-Land Assets 68. In addition to land acquisition, the proposed new SMVT lane and structures in the JCTE road will cause displace men to residential and commercial households and CPRs, cutting of trees, loss of livelihood, etc. The physical structures are mostly found on the private land and are made of concrete materials /bricks and tin sheds. 1. Iimpaction Structures by Section 69. Table 9 presents the affected structures under the four contract packages (WPs) by quantity of structure (in square feet). Among the four WPs, WP-02is the most affected and the impact gradually decreases for WP-01 to WP-04. A total of 1,033 HHs are losing structures by the project ROW. About 60.79% of the affected structures are commercial. There will be 19 community structures that will be affected which constitutes about 3.38% of the structural impact. Table9: Impacts of Quantity of Structure by Work Package No. Work Package (WP) Loss type (in sq. feet) WP-01 WP-02 WP-03 WP-04 Total (in sq. ft) 1 Total quantity of structure 142889 765955 474370 50562 1433776 affected (in sq. ft) 2 a Totalffec tquantityed (insqf tof) residential 27370 241822 218002 26531 513725 Structure affected (in sqft)

20 Data provided by RHD/PIC to the PIC Resettlement Specialist in October 2018. The list may still be updated and will be included in the revised supplementary RP.

26 3 Total quantity of commercial 113324 491039 243397 23831 871591 Structure affected (in sqft) 4 Total quantity of CPRs 2195 33094 12971 200 48460 (in sqft) Source: Census June-August201

2. Iimpaction Common Property Resources (CPRs 70. A total of 19 CPRs have been primarily identified within the proposed ROW. Consultation with the communities suggested that some of the facilities like schools, mosques, graveyard and temples are used by the local people very often. The 19 CPRs will lose structures and land due to the new SMVT lane and structures in the JCTE road. Out of 19 structure-losing CPRs, 2 found are located in WP-01,8CPRs are located in WP-02, there will be 7 CPRs in WP-03 and 2 CPRs are situated in WP-04. The number of CPRs affected due to the new project is shown in Table 1 Table 10: Total Number of Affected CPRs by Type and Contract Package No. Type of CPRs Affected WP-0 WP-02 WP-03 WP-04 Total 1 (in No.) No. No. N 1 Mosque 1 3 2 0 6 2 NGO Office/Society Office 1 1 0 0 2 3 Temple 0 0 1 0 1 4 Madrasa 0 0 1 0 1 5 Moha Soshan (Graveyard 0 0 1 2 3 & Cremation Ground) 6 Sch ool 0 4 2 0 6 Total 2 8 7 2 19 Grave under Moha 2 23 96 15 136 7 Soshan and Private Land Owners Source: Census and IOLsurveyJune-August2018

71. There are 136 graves/ graveyards under private land acquisition thatwill be affected due to the project’s new SMVT lane and structures, of which the highest number (96) is in WP-03 and the least (2) in WP-01. The Graveyard committee/Owners were personally consulted during the census/IOL. The project authority needs to look in to the matter seriously and the committee of graveyard need to be consulted as well for the shifting of the graves in a new location. 72. The names and location (in chainage) of the CPRs such as mosques, schools, temples and NGOs in all four contract packages that will be affected by the new project scope (SMVT and structures) on the right side of the JCTE road are shown in Table 11. Specific location of the graveyards is not included in the table below as there are 136 in all. However, these are included in the database prepared by the INGO (CCDB) that conducted the IOL/SES in June to August 2018. Table 11: Names and Location of the CPRs affected by the Project (in Mouza/ District and Chainage) by Contract Package No. Name (affected Location Chainage Infrastructure) WP -01: 1 Konabari Samaj Kallyan Location Name: Konabari 6+600 Office (Used as Kashimpur Signboard; Mouza: Mirpur; (right side) Female Child Services) District: Gazipur 2 Bymail Jame Mosque Mouza/Location Name: Bymail; 4+800 District: Gazipur (Beside Arfan (right side) CNG Station, Bymail Bazar) 27 WP -02: 1 Gorai Ronarchala Jame Mouza/Location: Gorai; Upzilla: 25+310 Mosque Mirzapur; District: Tangail (right side) 2 Misronbibi Jame Mosque Mouza/Location: Gorai; Upzilla: 26+080 Mirzapur; District: Tangail (right side) 3 Shohagpur Bazar Jame Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: 28+340 Mosque Tangail (right side) 4 Gorai Mill Gate Jame Mouza/Location: Gorai; Upzilla: 27+400 Mosque Mirzapur; District: Tangail (right side) 5 Tangail Cotton Mill Primary Mouza/Location: Gorai; Upzilla: 27+520 & High School Mirzapur; District: Tangail (right side) 6 Gorai Primary & High Location: Shohagpur Bazar; 28+300 School Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: (right side) Tangail 7 Shohagpur Government Village: Shohagpur 28+340 Primary School Mouza: Mirzapur District: (right side) Tangail 8 Markasul Dawah Cadet Mouza/Location: Gorai; Upzilla: Madrasah Primary School Mirzapur; District: Tangail 9 NGO Mouza/Location: Gorai; Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail WP -03: 1 Jamurki Moha Shashan Village: Jamurki, Upzilla: 44+500 (Hindu Graveyard) Mirzapur, District: Tangail (right side) 2 Gullah Boira Graveyard Village: Gullah, Upzilla: Basail, 51+950 District: Tangail (right side) 3 Kadim Dholla Faizul Ullum Village: Kadim Dholla, Upzilla: 40+900 Kaomi Madrasah Mirzapur, District: Tangail (right side) 4 Subolla Centre Jame Upzilla: Mirzapur, 38+600 Mosque District: Tangail (right side) 5 Kurni Bazar Jame Mosque Village: Kurni, Upzilla: Mirzapur, 37+900 District: Tangail (right side) 6 Tarotia Govt. Primary Upzilla: Tangail Sadar, 57+150 School District: Tangail (right side) 7 Gullah Boira Govt. Primary Village: Gullah, Upzilla: Basail, 51+180 School District: Tangail (right side) 8 Motora Temple Village: Motora, Upzilla: Basail, 49+700 District: Tangail (right side) WP -04: 1 Shibpur Shashan Adjacent to culvert no. 53 61+184 Mouza: Shibpur, Tangail Sadar (right side) 2 Elenga Moshajan Near Bridge No. 7 68+700 Cremation Ground (Palu Bridge) (left side) Upazilla: Kalihati, District: Tangail Sources of data: PIC, and actual site visit by PIC with CCDB staff on 30 Sept. 2018 . E. Affected Trees 73. A total of 12,274 trees of different categories located on private land will be affected or need to be cut due to the project. Out of the total affected trees, the highest number 6,932 (56.48%) belong to large category followed by 2,855 (23.26%) medium, 1,740 (14.18%) small and 747 (6.08%) sapling/plant. 74. For the age or size of the trees, the following definitions were used by the survey team that conducted the census and the IOL surveys, as follows: (i) Large - More than 20 years; (ii) Medium - above 5 years to 20 years; (iii) Small - 1 to 5 years; and (iv) Sapling - less than 1 year. The details of the trees affected on private land in 4 contract packages (WPs) are shown

28 in Table12 below:

Table12: Number of Trees Affected in RTW by Work Package And Size on Own Land Type of WP- 01 WP - 02 WP - 03 WP - 04 Total Tree No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Large 101 63.13 770 61.21 3903 52.80 2158 62.28 6,932 56.48 Medium 16 10 325 25.83 1,831 24.77 683 19.71 2,855 23.26 Small 43 26.87 94 7.47 1,217 16.47 386 11.14 1,740 14.18 Sapling 0 0 69 5.49 440 5.96 238 6.87 747 6.08 Total 160 100 1,258 100 7,391 100 3,465 100 12,274 100 Total % 1.30% 10.25% 60.22% 28.23% 100% by section Source Census and IOLsurveyJune-August2018

1. Location Wise Types of Affected Trees 75. The results of the census/IOL have shown that about 12,274 different species of trees including fruit trees (5,959) and timber trees (6,315) on private land will be affected due to the project. Most of the fruit bearing trees include mangoes, jackfruit, guava, coconuts, beetle nuts, etc. There are also bananas that will be affected by the proposed new SMVT lane and other structures. Kinds of timber that will be affected are eucalyptus trees, mahogany and acacia. Along the JCTE road, some bamboos will be affected by the additional scope of work proposed for the project (see Table 13). Table 13: Number of Trees Affected in Private Land by Type, Size & Work Package Location Type of Large Medium Small Saplings (WP) Tree (in No.) (in No.) (in No.) (in No.) WP-01 Fruit Bearing Trees 65 12 23 0 Timber 36 4 20 0 WP-02 Fruit Bearing Trees 283 99 48 17 Timber 487 226 46 52 WP-03 Fruit Bearing Trees 1,896 677 527 306 Timber 2,007 1,154 690 134 WP-04 Fruit Bearing Trees 1,284 310 229 183 Timber 874 373 157 55 Total Fruit Bearing Trees 3,528 1,098 827 506 (N) Timber 3,404 1,757 913 241 Source Census and IOLsurveyJune-August2018

F. Impaction Wage Earners 76. A part from the direct impact households (incurring impact on structures and land), a total of 2,272 wage earners will also be indirectly affected due to impact on shops and large-scale commercial enterprises. Among the affected wage earners, a good number of skilled 590 (26%) skilled workers and 1,682 (74%) unskilled workers will be affected (see Table 14).

Table 14: Affected Wage Labors by Work Package No. Category o f Wage No. of wage Total eWParn -e 01rsa ff eWPctedby - 02 WoWPkPa -03cka ge WP -04 Labors (N &%) 1 Skilled wage Labors 73 289 215 13 590 (26%) 2 Uns kill ed wage Lab ors 187 806 655 34 1,682 (74%)

29 Total 260 1,095 870 47 2,272

(11.4%) (48.2%) (38.3%) (2.1%) (100%) Source Census&IOL, June-August2018 G. Vulnerability Status of Affected Household 77. As shown in Table 15, about 128 vulnerable HHs will be affected by the proposed new project scope, of which 64.06% of the vulnerable HHs are female headed and 35.94% are hard-core poor living in the project’s right of way (ROW) which accounts for about 7.50%of thetotal HHs.

Table 15: Total Number of Vulnerable Households Affected by the Project

No. Vulnerable WP-wise Vulnerable Affected Total AHs Category Households (AHs) WP-01 WP-02 WP-03 WP-04 No. %

1 Female Headed HH 2 41 35 4 82 64.06 2 Disabled HH 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hard-core Poor HH 27 14 5 46 35.94 Total 2 68 49 9 128 100% Source: Census and IOLSurveyJune-August2018 H. Project Impact on Gender 78. The female accounts for about 44.00% of the affected populationin the project area and 3.57% affected households are headed by women. About 81.45% of the economically active women are engaged in household chores as housewives without any cash income. Female headed households will require additional support and assistance to find and organize alternative housing. 79. The project will provide short-term and long-term benefits to local people including women. Employment could be generated during road construction and other civil works. During the implementation of the Project’s original scope of works, the contractors in the four contract packages hired unskilled women in civil works (i.e., carrying, loading and unloading construction materials, food preparation for the contractors’ labor force, cleaning, soil treatment and other tasks assigned by the contractors’ engineers/ foremen). They were also provided skills training or a sort of job orientation during the first day of their work at the construction sites. This is beneficial for men and women unskilled labor force seeking employment after the project has been completed. 80. The labor force regardless of gender were also provided awareness raising on gender including topics on HIV/AID and human trafficking prevention, core labor standards and road safety which they could share to other family members and neighbors. Employment of women in civil works, skills training and awareness raising on road safety, HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention will be provided to the labor force including women during the construction of new SMVT lane and other structures. They will be provided skills training especially the vulnerable affected persons. Additional knowledge and skills learned in the project will provide long-term benefits for the local people including women. 81. Having improved roads will provide positive impacts to local people including easier access to basic facilities and services (i.e., health center/ hospitals, markets, work place, schools, and other institutions and adjacent places). Travel time will be shortened, they could save time which they could use for more productive activities such as livelihoods and

30 households’ chores, and others. The JCTE road provides vital links to the national highway and there are many factories, commercial establishments and markets along the road from W-01 to WP-04. It will also improve road safety that could save lives of the people and prevent vehicular road accidents. 1. Risks of STIs Associated with the Project 82. Bangladesh is among the countries in Asia with low prevalence for HIV/AIDS. But the epidemic around the globe as well as high prevalence of HIV/AIDS in neighboring countries will not spare Bangladesh, if the people / communities will not be conscious enough to prevent the epidemic in the country. Infrastructure develops mentis creating wider scope for public interaction, cross-country migration, urban-rural migration and boosting of sex trade. There is apossibility of people being in contact with high risk groups through direct sex, blood transmission, injecting drug use and the like. The people including the labor force have low level of awareness on HIV/AIDS. The proposed road improvement will increase mobility of people and will invite number of internal and external migrant workers (including expatriates) during and after construction. Due to the influx of non-local people during construction and increasing urban rural migration, inter-district migration, there is a need to understand the risk of HIV/AIDS infection during and after construction. 83. The social assessments undertaken did not identify any significant risks in HIV/AIDS. As a mitigation measure, RHD will ensure that civil works contractors disseminate information at work sites on the risks of STIs, including HIV/AIDS, for those employed during construction. HIV/AIDS and human trafficking awareness and prevention for the labor force (male and female) and project implementers including contractors will be continuously conducted all throughout the project construction and maintenance stages. 2. Risks of Human Trafficking 84. Human trafficking is a risk encountered by developing countries. Poor people who lack awareness on human trafficking prevention end up as victims. In the previous years, there were cases of human trafficking in the country but not specifically mentioned which location or district they came from. An estimated number of 10,000 to20,000people from Bangladesh, mostly are women and childrenwere reported to had been traffic ked to India annually. About 200,000 women had been trafficked in different countries including girls as young as 9 years old (Jamil Ahmed Chowdhuri, 2003). These estimates essentially include cross-border labor migration where cases of exploitation is common due to vulnerable and unfair work conditions. 85. Increasing speed through the improved road over the Jamuna Bridge, which provides vital link to Dhaka City to other areas including the Garment City in Gazipur, and the Port City , and other places, one can anticipate it of transport in smuggled people especially women and children to cities as well across the border. To address concerns related to human trafficking, the Project has a social intervention which is the human trafficking awareness and prevention provided to the project implementers including contractors and labor force. They are also provided awareness on core labor standards which includes providing equal pay for equal work to both men and women; no child labor; no forced labor; equal opportunity for both men and women, and others. The RHD/ PIC and contractors at the sites including labor force participate in this kind of awareness raising and is being monitored regularly. Since the Project had commenced its implementation in 2014, there has been no reported cases of human trafficking among the contract packages project area. 21

21 RHD. 5 th SMR for SASEC Road Connectivity Project, July 2018.

31 III. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILEOFTHE AFFECTEDHOUSEHOLDS

A. Methodology Used in Determining the Socioeconomic Profile 86. The supplementary RP provides information on the socioeconomic profile of the affected households presented by contract package (location) for the proposed new project scope (SMVT lane and structures). Information was gathered using the Socioeconomic Survey (SES) questionnaire. Household interview was carried out during the conduct of the census of affected HHs and IOL in specific locations of the JCTE road where the new SMVT lane and structures will be constructed. The SES was conducted for the affected HHs. B. Demographic Profile of Affected Population 87. A total of 1,707 households (HHs) are affected by the project’s ROW and the total affected population is 6,883. The average house hold size in the project area is 4.03 which is lower than the national average of 4.4 (BBS 2011). Among the four contract packages, WP-03 has the largest number of households (831) or 49% of the total affected HHs. It is followed by WP-02 and WP-03 with 544 (32%) and 262(15%) affected HHs, respectively. WP-01has the least affected population with only 70 (4%) HHs. 1. Gender Distribution of Household Heads 88. Of the 1,707 affected HHs, 1,646 (96.43%) is male headed and the remaining 61 (3.57%) is female headed HHs in fourcontract/ work packages. Most of the female headed HHs are living in areas covered by WP-02 and WP03 with 24and33 female headed HHs, respectively. WP-04 has 3 female headed HHs. For the affected population (6,883), 56.01% is male and 43.99% is female. 2. Age Distribution of Affected Population 89. Table 16 shows the number of affected populations by age group and location (contract package). About 40% of the 6,883 affected population in the project area belongs to age group 30-45 years old, followed by those who belong to age group 15-30 years old which constitutes about one-fourth of the total affected population. Only 7% belongs to age bracket 45 to 60 years old and 28% for the 15 years old and below. The data in the table below shows that majority of the affected population are in their productive age. A significant size of affected area on the additional ROW of the JCTE 4-Lane Highway is used for commercial purposes.

Table 16: Total Number of Affected Population by Age Group and Location Age Group WP -01 WP -02 WP -03 WP -04 Total (Yrs) Up to 8years 11 75 437 47 570(N &%)(8%) 7-15 33 283 921 134 1,371 (20%) 15-30 21 637 697 361 1,716 (25%) 30-45 117 913 1219 497 2,746 (40%) 45-60 48 104 216 112 480 (7%) Total 230 2,012 3,490 1,151 6,883

Source: Census and IOL(3.3%) survey June-August(29.2%) 2018(50.7%) (16.8%) (100%)

32 3. Gender Profile of Displaced Population 90. Table 17 presents the sex profile of the population in the project area who will be displaced due to the new project scope (SMVT and structures) proposed in the JCTE road. The total male affected population is 3,855 (56.01%) and almost 44% female in the four contract packages. The most affected package is WP-03 with 50.70% and of which 23.09% is female affected population. Table 17: Sex Profile of the Displaced Population by Location

Location Total Affected Male Affected Female Affected (Work Package) Population Population Population No. % No. % No. % WP - 01 230 3.34 155 2.25 75 1.09 WP - 02 2,012 29.23 1137 16.52 875 12.71 WP - 03 3,490 50.70 1901 27.62 1589 23.09 WP - 04 1,151 16.73 662 9.62 489 7.10 Total 6,883 100 3,855 56.01 3,028 43.99 Source: Census and IOL survey June-August 2018 4. Population by Religion and Ethnicity 91. The majority (80.26%) of the affected population in the project area professes Muslim (Islam) as their religion. The remaining 19.74% of the affected population is Hindu. Based on FGD and census conducted in the project area, there was no known indigenous peoples (IPs) in the project area. Over 80% of the population in the project areas is Muslim and less than 20% belongs to Hindu ethnic origin. 92. The people in the project areas live harmoniously regardless of religion and ethnic origin, and they consider themselves as peace loving people. All of the people interviewed in the affected communities support the projects of the GOB especially the improvement of the JCTE road to 4-lane highway and an additional road widening (SMVT lane and construction of structures). D. Socioeconomic Profile of Affected Population 93. Based on the SES conducted for the affected HHs in June to August 2018, about 2.69% of the affected HHs is living below poverty line. Average HH size among the affected population is 4.03. The most affected HHs are those in commercial entities. However, there are 56 female headed affected HHs who are unemployed (housewife) or they have no source of income. 1. Households Distribution According to Land Type Affected 94. Of the total 1,726 HHswho affected by the project,1,665 or 96.40%is maleand61(3.6%) is female. There will be 401 affected residential HHs and 613 commercial/ business affected HHs. A total of 1,033 HHs will be physically displaced and 693 HHs will be financially displaced. There will be a total of 19 affected community property resources (CPRs) that will be affected (both land and structures). The details of these were presented in previous discussion (see Table 6: Summary of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts/ Displacements and Other Impacts) under Section 2: Scope of Land Acquisition. 2. Education Level of Affected Households 95. Based on the SES conducted (June to August 2018), a total 205 people were found to have in formal education with 223 people have basic literacy only. There were 617 people who obtained secondary level of education and 205 in primary level. In all education levels, the number of female populations is lowerthan the male population.

33 3. Primary Occupation of Affected Households 96. Table 18 presents the primary occupations of the affected HHs, where almost 41% are engaged in business. This is followed by the affected HHs who are engaged in service/ working in garment factories which constitute almost 33%. Other primary occupations of the affected HHs include working as laborers (10%), agriculture/ farming (8.4%) and other jobs (4.9%). Of the 1,707 affected HHs, 56 (3.3%) claimed that they are housewives and have no job or regular source of income. They receive assistance from their children and other people, at least for daily subsistence. Most of the women affected by the project are working in garment factories and it is significant to note that the number of females engaged in business/selling is also high (with both husband and wife managing the business jointly). Table18: Primary Occupation of Affected HHs Primary WP - 01 WP - 02 WP - 03 WP - 04 Total No. Total % AgricultureOccu pa tion 12 28 91 13 144 8.4 Housewife 1 24 28 3 56 3.3 Business 35 159 358 147 699 40.9 Day Laborers 6 57 86 24 173 10.0 Service/Garments 15 245 239 58 557 32.5 OthersWorker 1 31 29 17 78 4.9 Total 70 544 831 262 1,707 100% Source: Census/IOLsurveyJune-August2018 E. Level of Per Capita Income of Affected Households 97. Based on data gathered from the SES for affected HHs, about 40.00% have a per capital income of BDT 84,001 to 96,000. The number of affected HHs with considerably lowper capita income level of above BDT 120,000 accounts for about 4.6%. According to the census, 46 HHs are living below the poverty line under per capita income per HH of less than BDT 72,000 per year. 98. Based on data from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), the upper poverty line for HH size of 4.72 in 2011 for Dhaka regions Tk. 6,458.86 per HH/month. Acknowledging the national inflation rates by BBS based on consumer price for the country (8.69% for 2011-2012 and 6.78% for 2012-2013) and an average HH size for the affected population being 3.74, Tk 5,939.71 income per HH/month has been adopted as the poverty line for the project. For this, the HHs with average yearly income up to BDT 6,000 per month (72,000 per year) are considered to be living under poverty line (see Table 19).

Table19: Per Capita Income of Affected HHs Income per Year WP - 01 WP - 02 WP - 03 WP - 04 Total (N) Total (%) 84,000 and below 43 156 215 63 479 28.00 84,001-96,000 11 185 357 132 685 40.00 96,001-108,000 5 97 106 37 245 14.40 108,001-120,000 7 89 107 19 222 13.00 Above 120,000 4 17 46 11 78 4.60 Total 70 544 831 262 1,707 100% Source: Census/IOL survey June-August 2018

34 IV. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE A. Consultation and Participation 99. Several consultation meetings with the affected population area had been conducted since the Project implementation commenced in 2014. This is an ongoing process for the affected population/ communities as stated in RP approved in February 2014. For the supplementary RP, separate consultations had been conducted when the design for the proposed new SMVT lane and structures for the JCTE road was prepared. 100. Intensive consultations were conducted during the IOL/SES in June to August 2018, and follow-up consultation with some of the affected population including those in the CPRs (i.e., mosques, schools, temple, etc.) were conducted at the sites in July to September 2018. Further consultation meetings with the RHD/PIC officers on land acquisition, budget, preparation of the technical specifications/ design for the proposed new SMVT and structures, and budget for LAR were also consulted in June and September 2018. The land owners, residential structure owners, business communities, squatters, women groups and other occupational groups were also consulted. 1. Consultation During Preparation of Supplementary RP 101. Community level stakeholders' consultation meetings were held in specific locations where the new SMVT and structures are proposed in the JCTE road improvement project, where there will be major impacts due to LA and displacement. Various occupational groups among the APs were also consulted through focused group discussion (FGD). A total of 6 stakeholders consultation meetings and 10 FGDs were held during thecensus and IOL survey conducted in June- August 2018; and follow site visit/ consultations/ FGDs with the committee leaders of affected CPRs and some AHs in all contract packages on 30 September 2018. These were participated by various stakeholders including and owners, business men, wage laborers, women and vulnerable groups. Concerned local government elected representatives, locally operational NGOs, Teachers, Religious Leaders, women groups, and local people who have interest on the JCTE project were also engaged in consultation meetings. 2. Methods and Techniques Used During Community Consultation 102. The stake holders were informed about the project including the proposed new SMVT lane and structures that will be constructed in the JCTE road. Specific information shared includes the process of land acquisition; entitlement matrix and other assistance for affected vulnerable groups (as stated in the RP/ SRP), etc.; the District Commissioner’s (DCs) payment procedures, cut-off-date; roles and responsibilities of the project authority, grievance redress mechanism (GRM), and other relevant information. Consultation through meetings, public consultations, FGDs, interview during the census/ IOL, the affected people/ HHs and other stakeholders could express their views about the project; perception or comments and suggestions relevant to land acquisition and compensation process, relocation requirements, and views on alternative design or options to avoid or minimize private land acquisition and displacement that may arise due to the project. 103. Bengaliis the official language used during consultation to ensure that all participants will understand information shared and in turn they could express their views and participate in decision making process. Prior notice (personal contact and announcement in public place) was given to the people as regards the date, time and venue of the meeting. This process will

35 be continued during implementation and monitoring of the RP. Follow-up consultation through FGD and interview with some local leaders, CPRs Committee Leaders such as schools, mosques, temple, etc. and affected HHs was conducted by the PICs jointly with the INGO on 30 September 2018. 104. Overall, the total number of people consulted within the project area from June to September 2018 is 335, including 55 (16%) female. Table 20 shows the number of consultations conducted and sex-disaggregated participants. Table 20: Number of Consultations Conducted and Participants (for Supplementary RP) Date & Location Type of Participants Number of Participant Time Male Female Total 7August Mirzapur Local Elected Govt. Representatives, 26 11 37 2018 Bypass, School Teachers, affected land owners, Tangail businessmen, NTHs, EA’s representative, NGOs representatives 11August Pakullya Teacher, squatters, businessmen, land 23 14 37 2018 Bazar, owners, wage laborers, NGO’s Tangail repres entati ves, local elite, etc. 11 August Natiapara Local Elected Government 38 0 38 2018 Bazar, Representative, Affected land owners, Tangail businessmen, non-titleholders, NGO’s representatives. 12 August Motra Land owners, business owners, local 35 1 36 2018 Bazar, elites, religious leader, squatters, Tangail tenants, wage labourers, NGO’s representatives. 18 August Vathkura, Landowners, businessmen, local 37 0 37 2018 Tangail elites, teacher, religious leaders, squatt ers , NGO ’s represe ntatives . 18 August Kathalia, Teacher, Squatters, businessmen, 36 0 36 2018 Kaliakoir, landowners, wage laborers, NGO’s Gazipur. representatives, local elite. 30 Sept. Gazipur & Consultations with CPRs Committee 40 25 65 2018 Tangail Leaders, Imams, local people, (WP-01 to teachers, and affected shops owners. WP-04) July, Aug Gazipur & RHD Officers, Project Managers and 46 4 50 and Sept Tangail Team at the site, PIC consultants, and 2018 (WP-01 to PIC construction supervision team WP -04) (site) and CCDB staff Total 281 55 336 (84%) (16%) (100%) Sources: PIC and CCDB. June-Oct 2018

B. Information Disclosure Measures 105. The results of the consultations have shown that almost all of the affected population/ people consulted are aware of the project and the proposed new road widening (SMVT lane). They are also in favor and supports the projects implemented by the GOB. 1. Disclosure of Legal and Policy Guidelines 106. The APs/ AHs including those who will be displaced due to the project’s new scope of work (SMVT lane/ structures) were informed about the project and the legal provisions of LA; ADB

36 policy on IR, as well as relevant laws issued by the GOB. Entitlements and other assistance as stated in the RP/ supplementary RP were discussed with the affected population. They were also consulted about their perception on land acquisition and compensation process, relocation requirements, and suggestions or alternative options. Highlights of the key issues raised and suggestions were shared with RHD and PIC officers especially on minimizing private land acquisition, construction of service roads, underpasses, foot-over bridges, just consideration in straitening the bends and compensation and other LAR issues.

2. Focused Group Discussion (FGD) 107.The APs were consulted in groups regarding the project goals and objective, potential social and resettlement impacts and their suggestions to address concerns/ issues raised. The discussions were held with special focus on their losses of properties and or livelihood. Affected people were brought together in groups based on homogeneity and or nearness. A total ten focused group meetings were held in July and August 2018, and follow-up FGDs with the CPRs’ committee leaders (i.e., schools, mosques, etc.) and other affected HHs conducted by RHD/PIC and CCDB on 30 September 2018. 108. The purpose of the consultation through FGDs is to inform the affected people/ communities about the project’s new scope of works under SMVT, elicit their views on project impacts and benefits from having improved roads and inform them of the affected area and entitlements as stated in the RP/ supplementary RP, and give suggestions relevant to the project. 109. Table 21 presents the summary of the FGD conducted by the RHD/PIC and INGO team in the affected communities held in July to August 2018. Highlights of the consultation meetings, date and venue and attendance and pictures in the project area are included in the 110. Annex 2: Table 21: Summary of the Consultation Meetings/ FGDs Conducted (July-Aug 2018) Date and Focused Summary of the Consultations/ Venue Gr oup FGD Conducted 7July2018 Private land  Private land owners and representatives of cremation center Garindha owners, of Garindha area stated that there are many graves in the Cremation Religious cremation center. About 15 Graves, land and structure will Center, Leader be affected. Tangail. (Participants:  RHD would reconsider the alignment and avoid acquisition of 13 male) the private land and cremation center’s land so that the resettlement impacts would be minimum.  In terms of compensation, instead of land replacements, they expressed that they would prefer cash compensation based on current market value of adjacent land in the area so that they can purchase alternative lands.  Suggestion: To be given assurance that they will not be harassed during payment of compensation. 14 July Land Owner  Private land owners and representatives of Gullya Boira 2018 and Graveyard users stated that there are many graves in the Gullya Graveyard graveyard. Due to land required for the project (SMVT Boira users lane and structures). A total of 30 Graves and land will be Graveyard, (Participants: affected. Tangail. 17 male)  RHD should reconsider the alignment and avoid acquisition of the private land and graveyard’s land so that the resettlement impacts would be minimum.

37  In terms of compensation, instead of land replacement, they prefer cash compensation at present market value of adjacent land in the area so that they can purchase alternative lands (and increase the size of remaining graveyard).  Suggestion: Requested to be given assurance not to harass them during payment of compens ation. 15July201 Land  Private landowners and school teachers of Boira Primary 8 Owner School stated that 50% of the school building will be affected Gullya and but the remaining structure will not be useable as the main Boira Teachers pillars of the school building will be affected due to further Primary (Participants road widening. School, : 9male)  RHD should reconsider the alignment and avoid acquisition Tangail of the private land and School’s land and structure so that the resettlement impacts would be minimum.  In terms of compensation, instead of land replacements, they expressed that they would prefer cash compensation based on current market value of adjacent land in the area so that they can purchase alternative lands (to increase size of the remaining land area of the school land area).  Suggestion: Requested for assurance not to harass them during payment of compensation. 4 August Land  Private land owners and representatives of cremation center 2018 Owner and (Jamurky area) mentioned that there are many graves in the Jamurky users of cremation center, about 36 Graves, land and structure will be Cremation Cremation affected due to the project (SMVT). Center, Center  RHD should reconsider the alignment and avoid acquisition of Tangail. (Participants the private land and Cremation center’s land so that the :14male) resettlement impacts would be minimum.  In terms of compensation, instead of land replacement, they prefer cash compensation at current market value of adjacent land in the area so that they can purchase alternative lands.  Suggestion: Asked for assurance not to harass them during payment of compensation. 5 August Land  Private land owners and representatives of Mosque stated 2018 owner s and that 50% of the 2 storied Mosque building will be affected but Ranar representatives remaining will not be useable as the main pillars of the chala of mosque will be totally affected. Jame Mosque  RHD should reconsider the alignment and avoid acquisition Mosque, (Participants: of the private land and School’s land and structure so that Gorai, 10 male) the resettlement impacts would be minimum. Tangail.  In terms of compensation, instead of land replacement, they prefer cash compensation at present market value of adjacent land in the area so that they can purchase alternative lands to new construct the Mosque Building.  Suggestion: Asked for assurance not to harass them during payment of compensation.

Total Participants: 63 (all males) Source: CCDB Draft Report on Results of IOL/SES, Sept. 2018.

38 C. Stakeholders Response to the Project–Feedback 111. All the people and communities consulted are in favor of the project, and they have expressed that they will support the projects of the government, including the Project (JCTE road improvement). They mentioned that the JCTE road will provide easier access to the local people in going to their work (where there are many garment factories, markets and commercial areas along the road). There are also schools, mosques and temples that could be easily reached using cars and other kinds of vehicles.

112. For the structures, land and other assets that will be affected due to further road widening (new S2+2+0 MVT lane and structures), the APs suggested that they want a fair compensation based on current market value, they should be given assurance not to harass them during payment of compensation as they will use the cash payment to buy a new land and/ or start a business again (which is the primary source of income of over 40% of the affected HHs). Other AHs suggested that proper resettlement and income restoration/ rehabilitation need to be implemented. They also suggested that objective judgment be applied or considered on the alignments to minimize private land acquisition, and instead maximize the use of previously acquired land. The summary of the expectations and suggestions raised by the affected people by location is shown in Table 22. Table 22: Summary of Expectations and Suggestions of Affected People by Location Location Total No. of Expectations / Suggestions of APs participants by Location Gazipur  100% of the people consulted demanded for compensation at District current market price or value; (Kaliakoir  They should be assured that no harassment during payment of area) compensation. 36  100% of land owners suggested ensuring best use of government land to minimize private land acquisition.  Business owners demanded are at on able business grant cause for business losses during construction work and shifting of business location.  Most of wage laborers demanded a good amount of grant due to losing their job. Tangal  100% of the people demanded for compensation at present District market price and no harassment in paying the compensation. (Mirzapur  100% of land owners suggested ensuring best use of By pass, government land to minimize private land acquisition. Pakullya 245  Business owners demanded a areas on able business grant Bazar, cause for business losses during construction work and shifting Natiapara of business location. Bazar,  Most of wage laborers demanded a good amount of grant due Motra to losing their job. Bazar,  Representatives of CPRs committees raised that price and Vathkura grant for graves, schools, mosques, temples should be higher area) than other normal prices so that they could buy new land and construct new structures.  All participants demanded quick payment of compensation and resettlement benefits.

Total Number of Participants: 281 Source: RHD/PIC/CCDB StakeholdersConsultation Meetings/FGD (June to September 2018).

39 D. Key Concerns of the Affected Persons and Mitigation Measures 113. Land owners, business community and other affected HHs with land and structures that will be affected by the project have expressed their views on key issues/concerns and proposed mitigation measures to address the key issues raised. Among the key suggestions raised by the affected HHs include (i) minimize private land acquisition in marketplaces to avoid displacement of business structures; (ii) If the first one is unavoidable, provide alternative land for business instead of land compensation so that they could engage again in business; (iii) some businessmen who are encroaching on RHD land affected by the road alignment), demanded adequate compensation for structure and business rest oration assistance. 114. Likewise, the affected wage laborers raised a major concern that they might be jobless due to displacement of business institutions. Specific concerns/ key issues and mitigation measures are presented in the table below. Table 23 presents the key concerns and mitigation measures raised by the participants during the consultations/ FGDs conducted.

Table 23: Observations/ Expectations and Mitigation Measures Raised by the Stakeholders Consulted (July-August 2018) Key Issues Observation/Expectations Raised by Mitigation Measures the Participants Relocation of  The Project need to relocate a  As the road is designed for widening from 4-Lane to another SMVT The residential significant number of shops and Lanes in both side and the and residences in certain locations. residence and shops will be affected commercial Affected HH heads of residential and along the project roads project structures commercial establishments are worried sponsored relocation in any that they may not be able to look for a particular location is not feasible. replacement homestead or commercial Therefore, the HHs that will be land. The reasons include that most of displaced and shop owners are the mare on the Govt. land and would encouraged for self- relocation. not receive any benefit.  Financial assistance and skills  They prefer to stay or look for a land training supportwill be proposed for within or around present location and restoration of their lost income proposed that they be provided with reasonable benefits/ assistance in the project.

Compensation  Compensation for affected land/ assets  The land compensation has been should be based on current market assessed based on current market For the price of the road adjacent lands (so price obtained from the local affected Land that they could purchase new land and knowledgeable persons. and other construct new structures if properties compensation is high or reasonable).  Structures and other affected assets are also valued based on current  Structure and other affected market price (and in reference to propertiesalso need to be assessed/ other recent and similar valued current market price. development projects).

40 Gender  Women co-sharers often non-  The acquiring body should identify complian residentsin the area should be all the awardees including the ce policy identified to ensure payment of women of a jointly owned plot and compensation and resettlement benefit issue them individual awards. The of their lost property. same should be done providing resettlement benefits.  The share of compensation of married daughters should be as per law of land administration (Sister: Brother: 1:2 as per Muslim law)

Support for  Poor people losing land may not be  Requiring body may pay the compensation able to process necessary papers and additional Grant over Cash award documents to establish ownership Compensation under Law (CCL) collection required for claiming compensation at following notice under Section-8, so the LA office. Cost of compensation that they can collect their collection may also be high. resettlement benefit before CCL is paid.

 There should be some institutional and  A supports system has to be financial support for clearing/updating established in such a way that the ownership targeted to the Poor and entitled Persons (EPs) don't have to vulnerable groups likely to lose land. spend money for compensation collection. Employment  Wage laborers will be jobless for the  The RP prescribes one-month loss and time being due to displacement of salary for the wage laborers work business institutions. They are now @BDT300/ day irrespective of work getting salary within arrange of BDT nature. Opportunities 6000-10000 based on work nature. for the wage laboures

Special  Poor households who are dependent  Financial assistance and raining support for on shops significantly affected by the support are proposed for restoration affected project proposed that they be given of the affected HHs’ lost income. special financial and institutional vulnerable assistance to rebuild their income and Households llivelihoods.

Source: RHD/PIC/CCDB Team consultation meetings (July to Sept. 2018). E. Disclosure Plan 115. The draft supplementary RP was developed in close consultation with the affected HHs, RHD, PIC, and INGO which included discussing and agreeing on the scope of impact, the proposed compensation and rehabilitation measures such as ensuring access to appropriate mechanism in case of grievance related to the project. The final draft before it is uploaded on the ADB website will be discussed with the affected HHs. Once approved by the ADB, the supplementary RP will be uploaded on the ADB website of the supplementary RP in the and will be made available in the project affected areas. 116. An information brochure (similar to the previous) will be prepared with updated information and distributed to the affected persons and other stakeholders including local government representatives during the implementation of the supplementary RP. Information disclosure shall involve community level group discussion focusing on project policies,

41 entitlement matrix and project delivery frame work and timeline. Besides, photographs and documentary video show on project impacts (types and categories) and mitigation measures including policy matrix may bear ranged by the INGO. 117. Consultation with the APs/ AHs and other stakeholders will be conducted on a regular basis and continuous manner throughout the project cycle. Additional rounds of consultations with the DPs will be required during RP implementation. The other round of consultations will be conducted when compensation and assistance are provided, and actual resettlement process begins. The RP/ supplementary RP will be made available at RHD local offices and at local Union and Upazila parishads for the information of concerned stakeholders. Other steps and procedures for conducting consultation and participation, and information disclosure stated in RP February 2014 will be followed or implemented. F. Community Consultation During RP implementation 118. RHD will continue the consultation process during implementation of the RP. Resettlement-related brochures, leaflets and other communications materials in the local language (Bangla) will be published for distribution among the affected households. Further steps will be taken to (i) keep the affected people informed about land acquisition plan, compensation policies and payments, resettlement plan, schedules and process, and (ii) ensure that project-affected persons are involved in making decisions concerning their relocation and implementation of the RP. The consultation and participation will be instrumented through individual contacts, FGDs, public consultation, meetings and workshops. 119. The larger goal of this plan is to ensure that adequate and timely information is made available to the project affected people and communities and sufficient opportunities are provided to them to voice their opinions and concerns and participate in decision making. The consultation meetings, issue discussed and outcomes and subsequent follow-up actions will be recorded for future verification. The affected people and communities, and other stakeholders will also be informed about the Grievance redress mechanism (GRM) process and how they could raise concerns/ grievances, when necessary. Other steps and procedures on information disclosure and conducting consultation meetings as stated in the RP (February 2014) shall be implemented.

42 V. GRIEVANCE REDRESSMECHANISM

A. Background and Need for Grievance Redress Mechanism 120. The LA in Bangladesh allow landowners to dispute such acquisition in the beginning of the legal process. Once the objections are heard and disposed of, there is virtually no provision to attend complaints and grievances that individual landowners may bring in the later stages of the acquisition process or during implementation of LA P and/or RP. Furthermore, since the law does not recognize the non-title user so land, there is no mechanism to hear and redress their grievances. Project interventions and construction activities onsite may raise environmental, social and public health concerns among the APs and communities. 121. Complaint sand grievances may range from LA, resettlement, procurement and quality of works on site. Disputes over ownership and inheritance of the acquired lands of APs and assets missed by the census, joint verification; valuation of affected assets; compensation payment; and the like may arise in the process of resettlement. To deal with resettlement related disputes and to make the project accountable to the affected people and their community, acomplaint and grievance mechanism need to be established under the project. This mechanism will be an officially recognized community based "extra-legal" system to resolve disputes arising out of various matters related to land acquisition, resettlement, environmental, safety and other social concerns. B. Objectives 122. The Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) aims to reduce the risk for the project, offers affected persons and communities a constructive and effective means of airing concerns and issues, and achieving solutions. Specifically, the Project GRM is established to enable the affected persons to appeal any disagreeable decision of action arising from the implementation of the project and in particular related to the resettlement impacts and measures. 123. The fundamental objective of the mechanism is to resolve any resettlement-related grievances locally in consultation with the aggrieved party to facilitate smooth implementation of the social and environmental action plans. It will also democratize the development process at the local level and to establish accountability to the APs. Based on consensus, the procedure will help resolve issues/conflict amicably and quickly, saving the aggrieved persons resorting to expensive, time- consuming legal actions. C. Existing GRM for the Resettlement Plan (February 2014) 124. A GRM has already been set up for the Project following the ADB’s SPS, 2009 requirements with the implementation of the RP prepared for the project and by ADB in February 2014, and has been uploaded in the ADB website. The existing GRM mechanism will be utilized in addressing issues and concerns pertinent to the implementation of this supplementary RP. 22

125. The GRM procedures and process that were comprehensively discussed in project’s RP (February 2014) will be used as a reference in implementing the supplementary RP. The APs will be fully informed of their rights and of the procedures for addressing complaints

22 The GRM process in Flow Chart in RP Feb 2014 will still be utilized for the implementation of the supplementary RP which was already approved by MoRTB.

43 whether verbally or in writing during consultation, survey, and time of compensation. The project planning and implementation will be cautious enough to prevent grievances through advance counseling and technical assistance to the APs in the land acquisition and compensation collection process. This will been sured through careful LAR design and implementation, by ensuring full participation and consultation with the APs, and by establishing extensive communication and coordination between the affected communities, the RHD, andconcerned local government agencies, in general. 126. Table 24 shows the GRM guidelines as stated in ADB SPS 2009, and updates on the existing GRM in the project. Table 24: Grievance Redress Mechanism for the Project

ADB SPS, 2009 on GRM Project’s GRM (as stated on 2014 RP)

 The government/ client will establish  The Project’s Grievance Redress Committees a mechanism to receive and facilitate (GRCs) have been established since the the resolution of affected persons’ implementation of the project and the 2014 RP in concerns and grievances about the same year and is functional to date. GRCs physical and economic displacement have the following hierarchy or levels: and other project impacts, paying particular attention to the impacts on (i) Community Level at Union Parishad/ vulnerable groups. Municipality consisting of representatives from the affected persons/ communities including women, women sector, local government institution, INGO implementing the RP, Sib-Divisional Engineer and RHD Executive Engineer as the Convenor);

(ii) Project Level consisting of Project Manager, Chief Resettlement Officer and Project Director (RHD) as Convenor.

 At the RHD Level, the members of the GRC are the Chief of Environmental and Social Circle, Chief Engineer (CE) as the Convenor, and a Reviewer appointed by CE, RHD at the level of Additional.

 The GRM should be scaled to the  The GRC is set up at the community and project risks and adverse impacts of the levels with representatives from the affected project. communities/ APs, agencies, INGO, administrative offices such as DCs office, etc.

 The GRM should address affected  The GRCs members have been provided training persons’ concerns and complaints or orientation on the GRM process, roles and promptly, using an understandable responsibilities and with guidance from the PIC and transparent process that is and INGO and RHD to ensure timely action and gender responsive, culturally feedback on the issues/ grievances raised. appropriate, and readily accessible to the affected persons at no costs and without retribution.

 The GRM should not impede access  GRCs aims to receive and address concerns and to the country’s judicial or grievances in all levels, and does not impede administrative remedies. with the Government’s judicial and administrative remedies.

44  The borrower/ client will inform the  The affected HHs have been informed about affected persons about the the GRM during resettlement planning and mechanism. implementation of the RP 2014, and is an ongoing process (as the implementation of the project is still in progress); and during the census/IOL and consultations with the affected persons held in June to September 2018. GRM is also reflected in the resettlement booklet prepared in 2014, in Bengali language.

Source: ADB SPS, 2009; and RP (Feb. 2014); Social Monitoring Reports, and INGO (CCDB). 127. The GRC decisions will be on a majority basis and concerned APs/ AHs’/ local communities will be informed. Where the complaining parties are not satisfied with the GRC decisions, they can go the Project Officer (RHD level) for resolution.23 This set-up aims to address any concerns promptly, effectively, and transparently, accessible, and at no cost and retribution, to the APs and communities at the project level. Early and satisfactory resolutions of complaints help reduce project delays and costs to the project. D. Scope of Work and Jurisdiction of the GRC 128. The RP (Feb. 2014) further defined the scope of work and jurisdiction of the GRC as follows: (i) Review, consider and resolve grievances, related to social/ resettlement and environmental mitigation during implementation, received by the committee; (ii) Any grievances presented to the GRC should ideally be resolved on the first day of hearing or with in a period of one month, in cases of complicated cases requiring addition a investigations. Grievances of indirectly affected persons and/or persons affected during project implementation will also be reviewed by GRC; (iii) The GRC will not engage in any review of the legal standing of an “awardee” other than in-direct losses or distribution of shares of acquired property among the legal owners and associated compensation or entitlement issues; (iv) GRC decisions should ideally be arrived at through consensus, failing which resolution will be based on majority vote. Any decision made by the GRC must be within the purview of social, resettlement and environmental policy framework. (v) The GRC will not deal with any matter spending in the court of law. But if the parties agree on through a written appeal, GRC can mediate. The parties will withdraw the litigation. (vi) A minimum three (3) members shall form the quorum for the meeting of the GRC. (vii) The Legal Adviser will not play role as member but will put his lawful advisee suggestion during GRC sessions E. Filing Grievance Cases and Documentation 129. The INGO will assist the APs in drafting the grievances. All grievances must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the GRC. The complainant may be represented by the DP him/herself

23 RHD. Resettlement Plan for the SASEC Road Connectivity Project: Improvement of JCTE Road to 4-Lane Highway. February 2014.

45 or appointed agent such as locally elected officials/legal advisors. The judgment made by GRC will be communicated to the concerned DP in writing. If dissatisfied, and with the agreement to the GRC, the AP may request a further review of the judgment of GRC by the Project-level GRC. In such cases, the case will be forwarded to the Convener of the project level GRC with all documentations. GRC procedures and operational rules will be publicized widely through community meetings, notices and brochures in the local language (Bangla) so that DPs are aware of their rights and obligations, and procedure of grievance redress. 130. All GRC documents will be maintained by the INGO for review and verification by supervision consultants and ADB. INGO Field Office(s) will act as the Secretariat to the GRCs. As a result, the records will be up to-date and easily accessible on-site. GRC meetings will be held in the respective Field Office of RHD or other location(s) as agreed by the Committee. If needed, GRC members may under take field visits to verify and review the issues at dispute, including titles/shares, reason for any delay in payments or other relevant matters. The complaints and grievances from the DPs will be addressed through the process described below in Table 25. Table 25: Grievance Redress Resolution Process

Step1  The INGO on behalf of RHD informsA P s / DPs and counsels the mon land acquisition and resettlement policy, compensation and entitlement modalities, entitlement packages, and eligibility and process to obtain the entitlements.

 DPs with clear understanding, approach DC and RHD for compensation under law and assistance under RPs as applicable.

 DPs with confusion and valid complaints on LAR process and entitlement approach GRC for resolution. The aggrieved persons may also opt to produce their grievances directly to the Project Director.

Step2  TheI N G O assists the aggrievedA P s / DPs to produce a written complaint to the convener of GRC with stories and expectations. The INGO counsels the aggrieved persons on the mandate and procedure of grievance resolution.

GRC scrutinize the case records and sort out cases to be referred to the DC or the court of law and those to be resolved in GRC.

 Hearing is organized on cases with marital the GRC secretariat at Union Parishad / Municipality Offices at local level and resolution is given by the GRC in one month of receiving the complaints.

 Aggrieved APs/ DPs satisfied with the resolution approach the EA for resettlement assistance under the provision of the RP. The agreed resolution is forward to RHD for approval by the PD before processing entitlements for the entitled person.

 In case the resolution is not acceptable to the aggrieved person, he/she approaches the PD through the GRC convener with assistance from the implementing NGO for further review.

Step3  Cases with all proceedings are placed with the PIU, where the PD reviews them at PIU with assistance from the Chief Resettlement Officer (CRO),

 GRCC on veneer and Member Secretary.

46  If found necessary, field investigation is carried out and their solutions are given within one month of receiving the complaints. Aggrieved APs/ DPs satisfied with the resolution approach the RHD for resettlement assistance under the provision of the RP. The resolution will be sent to the Conveners office to communicate to the aggrieved persons for acceptance.

 The resolution accepted by the aggrieved person is then approved by the PD. in case their solution is not acceptable to the aggrieved person, he/she approaches the Chief Engineer, RHD through the PIU with assistance from the Chief Resettlement Officer for further review.

Step4  Cases with all proceedings from GRC and from PIU are placed with the

 Chief Engineer, RHD where the Chief Engineer appoints a reviewer to resolve the grievance in view of the merits and redirect the case records to the PD, PIU with written resolutions within one month of receiving the complaints.

 Aggrieved APs/ DPs satisfied with the resolution approach the EA for resettlement assistance under the provision of the RP. The resolution will be sent to the Conveners office to communicate to the aggrieved persons for acceptance. The resolution accepted by the aggrieved person is then approved by the PD.

 Aggrieved DPs may opt to approach to the Court of Law, if the resolution at RHD is not acceptable to him/her.

Step5  The resolution accepted by the aggrieved persons at any level (GRC, PIU, RHD) is approved by the Project Director and forwarded back to the Conveners' office keeping records at his/her office.

 Based on the approved grievance resolution, the implementing NGO processes his/her entitlements and assists EA in arranging payment.

Source: RHD. RP for SASEC Road Connectivity Project (Feb 2014) 131. The PIU at RHD headquarters will keep record of complaints received for its use as well as for use by ADB during regular supervisions. The same GRM Flow Chart 24 shown in the RP (February 2014) will be used as reference and guidance. F. Approval of GRCs and Entitlements of GRC Members 132. Any decision and proceedings of GRC meetings at any level will be finally approved by the PD, PIU/RHD. The approved GRC decisions will be implemented onsite within the framework of the resettlement plan. All GRC members will attend at raining and orientation meeting prior to commencement of their work. The training will be conducted by Project staff and consultants/resettlement Specialists. 133. The GRC will hear the grievances once in 30 days. Since the entire resettlement process has to be completed before road constitution work starts, the GRC may meet more than once every 30 days depending upon the number of such cases. The GRC will inform the concerned aggrieved persons of their decision within 15 days of the hearing of the grievances. G. Grievance Redress Monitoring 134. The Project Manager of PIU will keep records of all the grievances and their redress in monthly cumulative formats, which will be provided by the INGO and to be signed by the

24 RHD. RP (Feb. 2014), Figure 4: GRM Flow Chart, p. 58.

47 convener of the GRC. The format will contain information on the Number of grievances received with nature, resolved, and ‘the number of, unresolved grievances.

48 VI. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

134. The GOB does not have a national policy on IR. Eminent domain law is applied for LA for infrastructure projects, where it is evident as required for public interest. However, in projects with external finance, GOB adopts project specific policy on LAR. The legal and policy frame work of the Projection land acquisition and resettlement is based on the GOB law son Land Acquisition and ADB SPS 2009. Based on the analysis of relevant laws and ADB’s Policy requirement, the LAR principles for the project component: Improvement of JCTE 4-Lane Highway have been adopted. A. Legal Framework 135. The present principal legal instrument govern in land acquisition in Bangladesh is the Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Act, 2017. The Act, 2017 requires that compensation be paid for (i) land and as sets permanently acquired (including standing crops, trees, houses); and (ii) any other damages caused by such acquisition. The Act provides certain safe guards for the owners and has provision for payment of "fair value" for the property acquired. 136. The Deputy Commissioners (DC) in all the cases, determine "market value "of acquired assets on the date of notice of acquisition (notice under Section 4 of the Act, 2017). The DCs then adds 200% additional for Land and 100% additional for other assets of the assessed value for cash compensation under law (CCL). The CCL paid for land is generally less than the market value as owners customarily report undervalued land transaction prices to avoid higher stamp duty and registration fees. If land acquired has standing crops cultivated by tenant (“bargadar”) under a legally constituted written agreement, the law requires that part of the compensation money be paid in cash to the tenants as per agreement. Places of worship, graveyard and cremation grounds are to be acquired by paying proper replacement cost/relocation including consultation with the community representatives. The law requires that the salvaged materials upon payment of compensation will be auctioned out by the government. 137. Under the Act, 2017, the Government is obliged to pay compensation only for the assets acquired. Households and assets moved from land already acquired in the past for project purposes and/or government khas land are not included in the acquisition proposal and the before excluded for considerations for compensation under law. Lands acquired for development of road and bridge cannot be used for other purposes by the RHD. Further, the Act does not deal with social and economic impacts as a consequence of land acquisition. For instance, the Act does not cover project-displaced persons without titles such as informal settler (squatters), occupiers, and informal tenants and lease-holders (without registration document). The Act has no provision for resettlement of affected households and businesses or any assistance for restoration of livelihoods of the displaced persons. B. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009 138. The ADB SPS 2009 consolidates three existing safeguard policies: (i) involuntary resettlement (IR), (ii) indigenous peoples (IPs), and (iii) environment. The objectives of the IR are: (i) to avoid IR, wherever possible; (ii) to minimize IR by exploring project and design alternatives; (iii) to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms, relative to pre-Project levels; and (iv) improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. The IR safeguards covers physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of

49 land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. It covers them whether such losses and involuntary restrictions are full or partial, permanent or temporary. 139. The ADB SPS (2009) recognize and address the resettlement and rehabilitation of all DPs irrespective of their titles and requires the preparation of RP in every instance where IR occur, states the requirements and principles to guide in implementing the RP, and address the LAR impactsfor theaffected persons. Thesummary of the ADB policy requirements are listed down below. The detailed explanation for the policy requirements is discussed in the ADB SPS, 2009. i. Avoid or minimize impacts where possible; ii. Consultation with the displaced people in project planning and implementation. iii. Payments of compensation for acquired assets at there placement value; iv. To enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. v. Planning through has survey and/ or census of displaced persons, including gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks. vi. Explore viable alternative project designs to avoid and/or minimize involuntary resettlement. vii. Carryout meaningful consultations with affected persons, host communities, and concerned agencies/organizations. viii. In formal displaced persons of their entitlements and resettlement options. Ensure their participation in planning, implementation and M&E of resettlement programs. ix. Pay particular attention to the needs of the vulnerable groups, especially those below poverty line, the land less, the elderly, women and children and indigenous people, and those without title to land, and ensure their participation in consultations. x. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the DPs concerns. xi. Support the social and cultural institutions of displaced persons and their host population. xii. Ensure that no one is worse off as a result of resettlement and would maintain their at least original standard of living. xiii. Resettlement assistance to Displaced persons, including non-title persons; xiv. Disclose the resettlement plan and other relevant information in a form and language(s) accessible to key stakeholders, civil society, particularly affected groups and the general Public. xv. The borrower client will conduct socioeconomic surveys and a census, with appropriate socioeconomic base line data to identify all persons who will b e displaced by the project and to assess the project's socioeconomic impacts on them. xvi. As part of the social impact assessment, the borrower will identify individuals and groups who may be differentially or disproportionately affected by the project because of their disadvantaged or vulnerable status. 50 xvii. Ensure that the existing social and cultural institutions are supported and used to the extent possible, including legal, policy and institutional framework of the country to the extent that the intent and spirit of the IR policy is maintained. xviii. Resettlement plans will elaborate of displaced persons entitlements, the income and lively hood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget and a time-bound implementation schedule. C. Legal and Policy Commitments 140. The RP has the following specific principles based on the government provisions and ADB SPS 2009: i. The land acquisition and resettlement impacts on persons displaced by the projects (physically or financially) would be avoided or minimized as much as possible through alternate design options; ii. Where the negative impacts are unavoidable, the persons displaced by the project and vulnerable groups will be identified and assisted in improving or regaining their standard of living. iii. Information related to the preparation and implementation of RP will be disclosed to all stakeholders and people's participation will be ensured in planning and implementation. The RP will be disclosed to the DPs in local language; iv. iv. The displaced persons who does not own land or other properties, but have economic interests or lose their livelihoods will be assisted as per the broad principles described in this document. v. Before starting civil works, compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation assistance will be paid in accordance with the provisions described in this document; vi. An entitlement matrix for different categories of people displaced by the project has been prepared. People moving in the project area after the cut-off date will not been titled to any assistance. vii. For titled holders the date of serving notice under Section 4 of the Acquisition and Requisition of the immovable Property Act 2017will be treated as the cutoff date. viii. For non-title holders such as informal settlers/squatters and encroachers the date of commencement of census survey i.e.01 June 2018 or a similar designated date declared by the project Executing Agency (RHD) will be considered as cut-off date. ix. Appropriate grievance redress mechanism will be established to ensure speedy resolution of disputes. x. All activities related to resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring would ensure the involvement of women and other vulnerable groups. xi. Consultations with the DPs will continue during the implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation works. xii. There should be a clause in the contract agreement that the construction contractor will compensate any loss or damage in connection with collection and transportation of borrow-materials. 141. In accordance with the resettlement principles adopted in this Project, all displaced households and persons will be entitled to a combination of compensation packages and resettlement assistance depending on the nature of ownership rights on lost assets, scope of the impacts including socio-economic vulnerability of the displaced persons and measures to support livelihood restoration if livelihood impacts are envisaged. The displaced persons will be been titled to:

51 i. Compensation for the loss of land at replacement value. ii. Compensation for loss of structures (residential/ commercial) and other immovable assets at their replacement value. ii. Compensation for trees, crops and fish stock to legally or socially recognized owners at current market price. iv. Assistance for loss of business/wage income; v. Assistance for shifting and reconstruction of structure, vi. Rebuilding and /or restoration of community resources/facilities; and vii. Special assistance to women headed and vulnerable households with support to livelihood and income restoration. D. Gap Analysis Between GOB Law and ADB SPS 142. There are some gaps in the Land Acquisition (LA) Law of Bangladesh and ADB SPS, 2009 related to land acquisition, compensation and IR. The LA law of Bangladesh does not recognize unauthorized occupants on the government land and there is no clear indication about avoid in go minimizing displacement rather mitigation of impacts through compensation payment while ADB SPS suggests avoid or minimize adverse impacts through alternative design options. According to the existing LA law people will be officially noticed about land acquisition but community level prior consultation and information dissemination regarding land requirements for the project are not usually done. 143. The ADB SPS 2009 requires meaningful consultation with the affected people and other stakeholders to disseminate project goals and objectives obtain peoples 'opinion about the project, roles and responsibilities of the project authority and affected communities, etc. The adverse social impacts due to the project are not mitigated as per existing LA law while uphold or at least restore previous standard of living of the affected people is one of the goals of the ADBSPS 2009. The existing law does not require any resettlement planning for the affected people whereas the ADB SPS requires preparation of resettlement plan, if the proposed project will have involuntary resettlement impacts. The objective of the resettlement plans will elaborate of displaced persons entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget and a time-bound implementation schedule. 144. The details on Gaps Analysis Between the GOB and ADB SPS, 2009 are presented in Annex 1. Safeguard measures to bridge the gaps between the GOB and ADB SPS are also discussed in the said Annex.

VII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCEAND BENEFITS A. Eligibility 145. The DPs entitled for compensation or at least rehabilitation provisions under the Project are those losing their land (titled or non-titled), tenants of agricultural land (irrespective of registered deeds) owners of buildings, crops, trees and objects attached to the land and those losing business, income and salaries. Eligibility to receive compensation and assistance will be determined with regard to the cut-off date, which is considered for those identified on the project’s ROW land proposed for acquisition at the time of census. The commencement date of the census was in June 2018, when video survey of the AHs were identified and recorded. Any HHs or persons identified on the project’s ROW during this process will be 52 eligible for compensation and assistance from the project. 146. The DPs were notified of the cut-off date during survey and a formal communication to this effect will be made to general public along with project information once upon receiving government approval, before the commencement of any LA or project activities. The DPs who settle in the affected areas after the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. However, they will be given sufficient advance notice, requesting to vacate premises and dismantle affected structures prior to project implementation. B. Compensation Entitlement Matrix 147. The supplementary RP will be implemented according to a compensation eligibility and entitlements framework in line with both GOB laws and ADB Policy (SPS 2009). The entitlements are based on provisions for compensation for land and other assets following the Act, 2017 and replacement cost and other assistance and allowances following the ADB SPS 2009. 148. An Entitlement Matrix has been prepared on the basis of census and IOL survey conducted for the households, shops and common/community properties affected within the project right of way. It identifies the categories of impact based on the census and IOL and shows the entitlements for each type of loss. It also describes the units of entitlements for compensating the loss of land, structure, business and various resettlement benefits. Furthermore, the entitlements matrix for the project complies with the policy framework for the project, harmonizing the national law with ADB SPS 2009 and has been benefited from good practice examples on in voluntary resettlement of externally funded development projects in Bangladesh. 1. Compensation and Entitlement Policy 149. The overall objectives of the compensation and entitlement policy of the supplementary RP for the Project’s new SMVT lane and other structures in JCTE road is to ensure that all AHs/ DPs due to the project receive compensation for all affected assets at full replacement costs, as well as resettlement assistance. The compensation strategy for entitlements is based on the type of impacts. The valuation of affected assets (land, structure, trees, etc.) based on the market value at current prices. 150. The resettlement benefits for all losses will be directly paid by RHD through an INGO that will be engaged by RHD to implement the supplementary RP. Details on eligibility and entitlement for the affected assets by type, guidelines and services are presented in Table 26.

53 Table 26: Eligibility and Entitlement Matrix 25 Loss item1: Loss of Agricultural Land Persons Entitlements Application Additional Services Entitled Guideli nes Legal  Replacement value (RV) of  RV will be  Legal owners will owner/ agricultural land. recommended be assisted by Title  Dislocation Allowance of by PAVC. INGO to organize holders as Tk.200 per decimal, not  DC will pay (cash legal documents identified exceeding Tk. 20,000 compensation in support of their by DC.  Stamp duty and registration Under law) CCL for ownership. cost on purchasing the land.  INGO will identify of replacement land using an  lf RV is higher than loss and amount not exceeding RV. CCL, the difference entitlement of Stamp duty and transaction will be paid by RHD female owners and costs will be paid if the with the assistance co sharers through replacement land is from the RP share purchased within 12 months implementing NGO. determination at of receiving CCL.  The dislocation the field upon allowance will be receipt of payment paid by RHD with data from DC assistance from office. INGO. Implementation Issues:  Persons entitled will be informed of the details about the LA and compensation process, resettlement package and payment procedure.  Property Assessment and Valuation Committee (PAVC) will recommend Replacement Value (RV) for land based on current market price (CMP) assessed by the Consultant at the time of preparation of the supplementary RP including cost of titling. The RV may be updated at the time of dispossession, if required. The CMP will be assessed for each affected mouza for each type of land averaging (i) minimum approved price of land available in the respective Sub-registrars "offices, (ii) reported price, and (iii) transacted price of land at those mouzas (CMP should not be less than minimum approved price of land). The MORTB will approve RV.  DC will determine the market price of land averaging last 12 months sale prices (from the date of service of notice u/s4) as per registration deeds in affected mouzas for each type of land obtained from respective sub-registrar's offices. For all private land, the market price will be enhanced by 200% for Cash Compensation Under Law (CCL).  Title updating for usufruct and other rights will be done before issuance of notice under section 7 with assistance from Implementing NGO (INGO).  The INGO shall encourage Entitled Persons (EPs)to consider purchasing replacement land or investing the money in productive/income generating alternatives.

Lossitem2: Loss of homestead, commercial, industrial land and common property reso urces Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guideli nes Ser vices Legal  Replacement  PAVC will  Legal owners owner/ value (RV) of recommend R will be Title agricultural land.  DC will pay CCL for assisted byI holders as  Dislocation Allowance the land. NGO to identified of Tk.300 perdecimal,  Lf RV is higher than organize by DC notexceedingTk.25,00 CCL, the difference legal 0 will be paid by RHD documents  10%of CCL per with assistance in support decimals land from the RP of their

25 RHD, Resettlement Plan (Feb. 2014); INGO (CCDB) Report (IOL/ SES Data) Sept. 2018.

54 development cost implementing NGO. ownership.  Stamp duty and The dislocation  INGO will registration cost allowance will be identify loss on purchasing of paid by RHD with and replacement land assistance from entitlement of using an amount INGO. female not exceeding  EPs losing owners and RV. homestead, co sharers  Stamp duty and commercial, through share transaction costs industrial land and determination will be paid if the common property at the field replacement land resourceswill be upon receipt is purchased given land of payment within 12 months developmentcostof data from DC so free receiving 10%ofCCL. office. CCL. Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  Persons entitled will be informed of the details of the compensation policy, resettlement package and payment procedure.  RV will be determined and approved for the project following the procedure as stated under Loss item1.CCL for private and khas land will be determined by DC as stated under Loss item 1. Title updating for usufruct and other rights will be done before issuance of notice under Section 7 with assistance from the INGO.  The INGO will encourage and motivate EPs to purchase homestead/ commercial/ community or industrial land or invest the compensation money in or income generation activities.

Loss item3: Loss of water bodies (pond, b oth cu ltivated and no n-cu ltivated) Persons Entitled Entitlements Application Additional Guideli nes Ser vices Legal owner/  RV of the water body  PAVC will recommend  Legal owners will Title holders as (Private land). RV of private land. be Identified by DC  Dislocation  DC will pay CCL for Assisted by INGO Allowance the land. to ofTK.200perdecimal  lf RV is higher than organize legal for perennial CCL, the difference documents in water-body, note will be paid by RHD support of their exceeding TK 20,000 with the assistance ownership.  Stamp duty and from the RP  INGO will identify registration cost implementing NGO). loss and on purchasing  The dislocation entitlement of of replacement and allowance will be paid Female owners using an amount not by RHD with and exceeding RV. assistance from Co Sharers Stamp duty and implementing NGO though share transaction costs will determination be paid if the at the field upon replacement land is receipt of payment purchased within 12 months of receiving CCL.

55

Loss item4:L ossof Residenti al str ucture with title to land Persons Entitled Entitlements Application Additional Guideli nes Ser vices  Legal owner/  RV of residential  Applicable to all  Assistance Titleholders as structure. structures located in relocation identified by DC  Transfer Grant a t on the ROW) at cut-off and TK.7 (seven) per dates. reconstruction. sqft of affected  PAVC will recommend structure. the RV of the  Reconstruction structures. Grant at TK. 10 (ten)  DC will pay CCL for per sqft of affected structure and if CCL is structure. less than RV, RHD will "Special Assistance pay the diff erence of onetime payment directly with the of BDT. 12,000/- assistance from INGO. (Twelve thousand)  RHD will provide other for each resettlement benefits female-headed and directly with BDT10000 (ten assistance from the thousand) for each INGO. male headed disabled, elderly (over 60) headed and very poor (below poverty line) household whose annual income is lessthanorequaltoTk. 72,000.  Owner will be allowed to take away all salvageable materials free of cost within RHD declared deadline.

Implementation Issues / Guidelines:  Joint Verification (DC and RHD) and /or Census will identify (records floor is and category) structure for titled owners. PAVC will recommend RV of structure considering the cost of materials, labor inputs and land development cost at current market rates. MORTB will approve the RV of structures recommended by PAVC. DC office with assistance from district Public Works (PWD) office will determine the market price of structures and enhance it by 100% for CCL.  Compensation must be paid before EP dismantles and removes the structures as per civil works requirement.  The Date of service of notice u/s will be the cut-off date for titled owners and the commencement date of the Census or any designated date declared by RHD will be the cut-off date for structures not covered by DC.

56

Lossitem5:Loss of Commercial/industrial structure and PCR with title to land Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services Legal owner/  RV of commercial,  Applicable to all structures  Assistance in Titleholders as industrial structure. located on ROW at cut-off relocation identified by  Transfer GrantatTK.10 dates. and DC (ten) per sq.ft. of  PAVC reconstruction. Affected structure. will recommend the RV of Reconstruction Grant at structures. TK. 15 (fifteen) per sqft of  DC will pay CCL for affected structure. structure and if CCL  Owner will be allowed to is less than RV, take all salvage able RHD will pay the materials free of cost within difference with assistance RHD declared deadline. from INGO.  RHD will provide other resettlement benefits with assistance from INGO. Implementation Issues/ Guidelines  Joint Verification identifies (records floor areas and category) structure for title downers and Census identifies structure for non-titled owners. RV of structure will be determined and approved in the process as stated in Loss item 4. CCL will be determined in the process as stated in Loss item 4.  Compensation must be paid before DP dismantles and removes the structures as per civil work requirement. The cut-off dates for titled owners and social iced owners as stated inLossitem4. Lossitem6: Loss of Residential and others physical structure without title toland (squatters) Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guideli nes Ser vices

57  Socially  RV of structure.  Applicable to all  Assistance recognized  Transfer Grant at Tk. 7 structures located on ROW in relocation Owners (seven) per sqft of affected at cut-off dates. and of structures structure.  FAVC will recommend reconstruction. built on the  Reconstruction Grant at the RV of structures. RO Was Tk10 per sq ft of affected  RHD will provide other identified structure. resettlement benefits during census  "Special Assistance of one- directly with assistance and verified time payment of from INGO. by PAVC BDT.12,000/-(Twelve thousand) for each female-headed and BDT 10000 (ten thousand) for each male headed disabled, elderly (over 60) headed and very poor household whose annual income is less than or equal toTk.72,000.  Owner will be allowed to take all salvageable materials free of cost within RHD declared deadline.

Implementation Issues/ Guidelines: Census identifies structure on the RHD or any Government land within project right of way. RV of structure will be determined and approved as stated In Loss item 4. Compensation must be paid before EP dismantles and removes the structures as per civil works requirement. Thecut-offdatesfortitledownersandsociallyrecognizedownersasstatedinLossitem 4.

Lossitem7: Loss of Community properties on private or Public land Persons Entitl ement s Appli cati on Addi tional Ser vices Entitled Guidelines  Legal owners RV of structure.  Applicable to  Assistance identified by  Transfer Grant at TK.7 (seven) all community in relocation DC in the per sqft of affected structure. properties and reconstruction. process Reconstruction Grant located on of CCL at Tk.10 per sq ft of affected ROW at cutoff payment. structure. OR Dates.  Socially  The project authority will constr uct recognized a new community property owners with the project cost of  Owner will be allowed to take all structures salvageable materials free of built on the cost within RHD declared ROW as Deadline. identified by PAVC Implementation Issue/ Guidelines:  Joint Verification identifies (records floor areas and category) structure for title downer sand Census.  Identifies structure for non-title owners.

58 Loss item8: Loss of trees with title to land and owner of trees on public land or lessees Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guideli nes Ser vices  Legal owner/  Timber trees and  Applicable to all trees  INGO to explain Title holders as bamboos of CCL. and plants located on RP policies identified by  RV of trees ROW at cut-off dates. regarding DC determined by PAVC.  DC will pay CCL as compensation for  Socially  Value of fruitsat 30% of applicable for trees/plants. the trees of recognized timber value for each  If CCL is less than different owners of trees grown up trees. RV or there is no CCL (for categories and grow-non-public  Owner of the tree will socially recognized size and make the or other land, as be allowed to fell and owners), the difference or EPs aware that identified by take the trees free of RV of different species of they could take the PAVC. cost within the RHD trees will directly be paid timber and fruits Owners of trees declared deadline. by RHD with assistance free of cost. such as Forest from INGO. Department,  PAVC will recommend RV Zilla Parishad, of tree sand fruits. Society, Union Parishad, Lessee on public land.

Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  Standard rates for trees of different species available with the Department of Forestry will be considered by PAVC in calculating the RV.  DCs will determine the market price of trees with assistance from district Department of Forest and enhance it by100% to fix compensation under law (CCL).  The INGO will provide guidance in plantation and post-plantation care.

Loss item9: Loss of Standi ng Crops/fish stock wit h title to land Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services  Owner  RV of standing  Applicable for all crops/fish  INGO will assist cultivators crops/fish stock. stock standing on land/pond DPs in the as identified  Owners will be within ROW at the time of processof claiming in joint allowed to take dispossession. compensation verification crops and fish  DC will pay CCL for crops/fish from DC offices for by DC, RHD stock with in stock. organizing and PAVC. RHD declared  RHD will pay the diff erence necessary deadline. directly with assistance from documents. INGO if CCL is less than RV.  PAVC will recommend RV of crops/fish stock at take away

Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  RV of crops / fish stock will be recommended by PAVC (based on data obtained from district agriculture extension office and district marketing officer) for those identified Through joint (DC/RHD) on-site verification before taking over land.  DCs will determine the market price of crops with assistance from district Department of Agriculture Extension and District Agriculture Marketing Officer and market price of fish with assistance from district Fisheries officer.

59 Lossitem10: Loss of leased or mortgaged land or ponds Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services  Leasehol d RV of crops/fish stock.  With legal agreement: Legal  INGO will er with  Dislocation Allowance will owner and mortgagee/ lease holder assist in legal be paid to the actual will be paid CCL by DC in ensuring that papers cultivator of the acquired accordance with the law. the and by RHD with  With customary tenancy Lessee assistance from INGOat agreements, including socially receives all Tk.300/dec. but not recognized verbal agreements: Eligible exceeding BDT20,000. Legal owner will receive CCL from payments.  The cultivate or will be DC. The legal owner will pay the  INGO will allowed to take the outstanding liabilities to the Mediate crops/fish within the lessee/mortgagee. Under the refund of RHD declared deadline  following conditions: (i) all outstanding contractual liabilities are already lease money paid up; (ii) if not, the legal owner by the owner will get the residual payment after to the all liabilities are paid up. lessees.  RHD will ensure RV of crops to the cultivator with direct payment of the difference, if CCL is less than RV, with assistance from NGO.

Implementation Issues/Guidelines:  PAVC will identify each land owner and any persons who presently have interest in the acquired land due to mortgages, lease or khai-khalashi right.  Any dispute saver status of present interest in the land will be resolved through grievance redress procedure. Once resolved, INGO will assist in processing payments of all outstanding liabilities on the land to the appropriate persons. Dislocation Allowance to cover loss of income will be paid to the tenant as per project- specific policy provisions.

Lossitem11: Loss of income from dismantled commercial and industrial premises Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services  Any  An amount equivalent to  RHD will directly pay  Vulnerable proprietor or three months net income the entitlement to EPs will be  Businessman based on three years the eligible displaced  brought or artisan average income as per TIN persons with under operating in certificate assistance from INGO. income premises, at butnotexceedingBDT5000  The net income will be  Generating the time of 0/month for large scale calculated as 30% of program. issuance of business monthly income as Notice u/s4 Enterprises which will be identified and/or as per  An amount equivalent to by PAVC (ref. census three months net income approved by should be against the small and MORTB-in SASEC identified by medium scale business Phase 1 PAVC price). PAVC. operators as per census but not exceedingTk.24,000 in total.  One-time moving assistance of TK. 5,000 for tenants .

60 Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  Primary eligibility to be based on business men identified by Census and/or DC & RHD Joint verification.  All large-scale business (whole sale dealer, CNG/Petrol Station, industries, and the like) operators will be entitled for three months net income based on three years average income (as per TIN certificate). The businessmen will produce TIN certificate before the RHD/INGO during RP implementation as prove of income.  All the business operators will be been titled for grant against loss of business. However, one-time moving assistance will be provided to only the tenants.  The income-generating program will be implemented by the INGO in their habilitation and livelihood generation activities for the poor.

Loss item 1 2: L oss of inc ome (wage e arners in a gricu ltural, small b usiness a nd indust ry Excluding owner sore employers) Persons Entitl ement s Appli cati on Addi tional Entitled Guidelines Services  Regular wage  Grant to  EP must have been an  Vulnerable EP swill be earners covertemporary employee of landowner or brought under income affected by loss of regular business located in the and livelihood the acquisition Wage income acquired lands for at least regenerating program. as identified at twelve months, as identified  Involvement of qualified by census TK.300x90days by Joint Verification and/or DPs in construction and or by the for skilled and Census. work. PAVC. 250 x 90days  The needs of vulnerable  Involvement of qualified for unskilled groups will be assessed. DPs in tree plantation wage laborers.  The resettlement benefits will and social forestation. be paid by RHD with assistance Implementation Issues/ Guidelines: fr omING O.  Primary eligibility to be based on wage earners identified by Census and/or Joint Verification. Further claims and grievances. If any will be settle by the grievance redress committee.

61 Loss item 13: Loss of income from rented-out and access to rented-in, residential and Commercial Premises com Personsmercial P remises Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services  Legal  Rental assistance for  Each renter of affected  EPs will be owner/titlehold both residential and premises will be been titled brought under ers of the commercial rented- rout for the dislocation income and rented-out EPs or owner of the allowance. livelihood premises as structure for the amount  The owners of rented Regenerating Identified by equivalent to 3 months' out premises will be program the PAVC. rent but not exceeding  entitled for dislocation Tk.7,500. allowance for each unit  Household/pe  Rental assistance for of premises rentedout to rson rented-in both residential and separate HHsor persons. any such commercial rented-in  Dislocation structure as EPs for the amount Allowance will be identified by equivalent to 1month paid by RHD with PAVC. rent but not exceeding assistance from the Tk.5,000 INGO,  Additional structure res  In case of any advance erected by tenant will be Deposited by the tenant, identified by the PAVC an agreement on non-claim and compensated as or outstanding balance itemNo.4 should be certified by the  Right to salvage local government materials from representative between demolished structure owner and tenant. The erected by tenant agreement will have to be submitted by both parties at the time of payment of resettlement assistance. It will be considered an essential part of the payment procedure. Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  Census and/or joint verification will identify the owner and renter of the residential and commercial premises.

Lossitem14: Lossof Tube well. Persons Entitled Entitlements Application Guidelines Additional Ser vices  Legal owner/  Compensation as RV to be  RHD will pay the  INGO will titleholders as determined by the PAVC. compensation as RV with Guide identified by DC.  Salvageable materials will assistance from INGO. installation of  Socially Be allowed to takeaway arsenic free recognized Free of cost. tube well. owners of structures built on the ROW as identified during census and by the PAVC. Implementation Issues / Guidelines:  RV will be paid by RHD, salvage able in any condition will be allowed to away.

62 Lossitem15: Loss of Toilet. Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guideli nes Ser vices  Legal owner/  Compensation as RV to be  RHD will pay the  INGO will Titleholders as Determined by the PAVC. compensation as RV ensure water identified by DC.  Salvageable materials will be with assistance from sealed toilet.  Socially allowed to take away fr ee INGO. recognized of cost without disturbing the owners project work. of structures built on the ROW as identified by census and the PAVC.

Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  RV will be paid by RHD, salvageable in any condition will be allowed to away.

Lossitem16: Shifting of households belonging/inside materials. Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guideli nes Ser vices  Legal owner as  An amount of  RHD will make payment  As appropriate appropriate Tk.5,000/-as shifting of the entitlement identified by DC in allowance will be given for shifting allowance with the process of CCL each House, assistance from INGO. payment. Shop/Commercial or Industrial Structure, Community Structure if shifted with in the Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:deadl ine  This entitlement will be paid to the head of the household by RHD after the shifting household belonging of the than house in structures.

Lossitem17: Disconnection of utilities (gas, electricity, telephone, water, sewage, etc) Persons Entitled Entitlements Application Guidelines Additional Services  Legal owner/  New connection  RHD will make  INGO will Title holders as assistance as payment of the helper identified by determined by PAVC. compensation money installation of DC/PAVC. with assistance from the Line Implementation Issues/ Guidelines: ING O.  This additional entitlement will be paid to the head of the house hold by RHD as new connection assistance. Lossitem18: Loss of Graves/Cremating round on public and private land. Persons Entitled Entitlements Application Guidelines Additional Services  Legal owner/  BDT 25,000/-per unit  RHD will pay the entire  INGO/PAV C Titleholders as grave (muslim /hindu) compensation as will ensure during identified by DC. to cover the assistance of joint survey.  Socially recognized assistance of relocation, reburial cost as a hereditary relocation, reburial for with assistance from right on the TH/NTH in addition to INGO. ROW RV for Land and as identified structure. by census and the PAVC.

Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  RHD will pay the entire compensation after finalization of PAVC’s survey and as an hereditary Right amount receiver will shift the grave/cremation.

63 Lossitem19: Loss of income and livelihood Persons Entitlements Application Additional Services Entitled Guidelines  Vulnerable HHs  Tk.10,000/-as one-time  The EPs will be  INGO will motivate whose annual grant in addition to them Identified as per the the EPs for income is less Ccompensations’ for male census and appropriate than or equal Headed households. income and skills toTk.72,000.00o  Tk.12,000/-as one-time livelihood support training. r the HHs with grant in addition to other will be provided by disabled or compensation for female RHD with handicapped or Headed/ assistance from widow or female disabled/handicapped/wid INGO. Cost of headed ow member family. trainer will be paid identified by  SkillsTraining for by RHD. census and vulnerable households PAVC. (one member per  EPs losing main household). Cost of source of income training not whose have no exceedingTk.10,000 for alternative source of one member and Tk. income as identified 5000/member for trainer by PAVC. NGO irrespective of the training period on each IGA.

Implementation Issues/Guidelines:  Vulnerable households losing in come from business, employment, livelihood resources and for the transition al time up to permanent settlement will be assessed by INGO-RHD Joint verification.  These persons will be covered under the skill training program and the allowances will be paid upon performance following the entitlement package.

64 Lossitem20: Loss of government agency provided residence Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services  HHs/persons  Shifting to housing of  Applicable to all government  RHD will residing in equal or better condition employees residing in identify government provided by the government assigned The govt. agency government housing on ROW on cutoff Employee assigned agency shifting cost dates Shifting cost will be and housing covered by the covered by the corresponding as identified by government agency. government agency under the assigned the Right to salvage regulation of Government. structure from Accommodation materials from  PAVC will identify and respective Board and demolished structure recommend the additional office. Administration erected / infrastructure erected/ Unit. extended by the extended by the government employee. government employee.

Lossitem21: Unforeseen adverse impacts Persons Entitlements Application Additional Entitled Guidelines Services  Households/  Entitlements will be  The unforeseen impacts will  As appropriate Persons affected determined as per be identified through special by any the resettlement survey by RHD as per unforeseen policy framework request from impacted impact identified population. during RP  The entitlements will be implementation approved by MORTB And ADB. Implementation Issues/ Guidelines:  Theunforeseenimpactsanddisplacedpersonswillbeidentifiedwithduecareasperpolicy frameworkandproposedtotheMORTBandADBforapprovalincludingquantityoflosses, them Owners and the entitlements.

C. Compensation Payment Procedure 151. The RHD will ensure that the properties (land, structure and non-structure assets) to be displaced for the project will be compensated at the fuller placement cost determined by a legally constituted body like the Property Assessment and Valuation Committee (PAVC) as per the Resettlement Plan. 152. The modalities for payment of compensation and other assistance for assets, income sand livelihood star gets is resettlement assistance for substituting and restoration of loss of income and workdays by the relocated HHs, especially the vulnerable HHs are explained in Table27. Table 27: Table24: Procedures for Land Acquisition and Compensation Payment to Titled Holder (TH) No. Procedures for LA and Compens ation Payment toTHs 1 RHD produces land acquisition proposal to DCs with Administrative Approval from the MORTB on the acquisition. 2 DCs carryout feasibility study of the acquisition and submit the proposal with the feasibility report to the Ministry of Land (if the land ismorethan16.67acres) or to the Divisional Commissioner (if the land is lessthan16.67acres) for approval case. 3 Upon approval of the LAPs from Ministry of Land (MOL) or from Divisional Commissioner, as the case may be, DC serves notice under section 4 of the Acquisition and Requisition of immovable Property Act, 2017 to the recorded owner of

65 the affected property for public appraisal. 4 Acquiring Body (DC) and Requiring Body (here RHD) representatives conditioning verification of the affected property within 7 days of serving notice u/s-4 and wait 15 days to receive any complain from land owners. 5 After that the DC serves notice u/s7 for enter training claims from the potential affected persons. 6 On the basis of joint verification survey data DC writes letter to Public Works Department (PWD) with information of affected structures, list of trees to the Forest Department and type of crops to the Agriculture Department for valuation as per government rule. 7 DC also collects recorded land price from the concerned Sub-register's office for 12 months previous time from the date of notice under section 4. 8 After receiving rates from the PWD, Forest and Agriculture Department the DC prepares estimate and send it to the RB for placement of fund within 60 days. 9 The DC prepares award for compensation in the name of recorded owner. 10 Upon placement of fund, the DC serves notice u/s 8 to the titled DPs for receiving cash compensation under law (CCL) within 15 days from the date of issuing notice us 8. 11 The affected people are noticed to produce record of rights to the property with updated tax receipt of land, declaration on non-judicial stamp, photograph etc. before Land Acquisition section of DC office with the claim. 12 Upon fulfill men to the criteria of the DC office i.e. requisite papers and document the LA section disburse CCL in the office or at field level issuing prior notice to the DPs. 13 Local Government institutions representative identifies the affected people during receiving CCL. 14 As per Act 2017, DC pays compensation to the legal owner of the properties for land, structure, trees and crops. 15 After receiving CCL from the LA office and obtaining clearance from the Treasury Section of the DC the entitled person (EP) deposits the CCL to his own bank account 16 One copy of the CCL will be submitted to the INGO office for additional payment of compensation as per RP. 17 The INGO will devise ID number for the CCL holder and prepare entitled persons file and entailment card (EP&EC) for payment. 18 The INGO will prepare ID card with photograph of the EP. 19 The ID card will be jointly signed by the RHD and INGO representative and photograph will be attested by the concerned-UP Chairman / Mayor or Ward Councilor of the Municipality / City Corporation. 20 The INGO will prepare necessary documents and papers (payment debit voucher, etc.) and submit to RHD field office along with EP payment list and EP-EC. Source: RHD. RP (Feb.2014).

153. The non-title holder (NTH) have no legal ownership of the affected property but socially recognized and enlisted during census and or Joint verification survey by PAVC. The Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Act, 2017 has no provision to compensate these types of affected people. The ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 prescribes to address these people without having legal title to the property. Table 28 presents the steps pr procedures to be followed in paying resettlement benefits to non-titled EPs (NTHs) or NTEPs. Table 28 : Table24:Steps or Procedures for Paying Resettlement Benefits to Non-Titled Holder (NTH) No. Steps or Procedures for Paying Resettlement Benefits to NTHs 1 As per tripartite joint verification survey by the PAVC and consult the census da ta, a final li st of DP s wil l be prepa red by the ING O. 2 Individual identity number will be created against the name of each Entitled Person . 3 Photograph of the entitled pe rso ns wil l be taken and ID cards will be prep ared 4 The INGO will prepare entitled persons file and entitlement card (EP file and

66 EC ) for each of the EP s. 5 The INGO wil l ass ist the EP s openi ng Bank Acc ount in thei r names 6 The tenants of the house or commercial premises will collect documents in favor of their tenancy or identification from the owner of the structure which will be attested by the concern UP Chairman/Ward Councilor/Mayor 7 Wage labor will collect certificate for the employer which will be attested by the concern UP Chairman/Ward Councilor/Mayor 8 The ID card will be jointly signed by the RHD and INGO representative and photograph will be attested by the concerned-UP Chairman/ Ward Counc il or /Mayor. 9 The INGO will assist RHD in preparing payment debit voucher as per EP file and EC and the RHD will disburse Account

Source: RHD. RP (Feb. 2014).

D. Property Valuation and Compensation 1. Principles and Methodology 154. The same process for calculating the value of all assets affected by the project, as stated in the RP February 2014 for the same project has been applied for the additional affected HHs included in the supplementary RP, taking into account the ADB SPS 2009 and relevant laws in the country. 155. The calculation of unit value is done keeping in consideration the current market rate so as to meet the replacement cost of the land and lost as sets etc. The Consultants (PIC) conducted census and IOL survey, determining replacement value of land, structure, trees and other affected as sets and preparation of resettlement plans and budgets for land acquisition and resettlement. 2. Valuation by Deputy Commissioners (DC) 156. The DCs of respective district will determine mouza-wise market price of land averaging sale price oflandparcelsfor12preceding months. Sale price will be collected for each type of land (homestead, vita, arable, pond, fallow and the like) in each lowest land administrative unit called "mouza". The prices will be averaged for each type in each mouza and a 200% premium will be added to determine the compensation under law. For acquired structures, the DCs will take assistance from the Public Works Department (PWD) for unit rates and again add 100% for compensation under law. For determining compensation for trees, Divisional Forest Office will be approached for assistance. Departments of Agriculture Extension and Department of Agriculture Marketing (DAM) will assist the DCs in determining compensation for standing crops. Fisheries Department at the district level will assist in determining compensation for fish stock. 3. Determination of Replacement Cost 157. Compensation for land and other physical assets has been determined based on current market price collected through hinter viewing different cross sections of the population and mouza rates collected from concerned sub-register's office. The compensation for land will be paid to DPs at full replacement cost before the time of dispossession. Replacement cost of land will be determined based on existing market rates to the extent possible and adding the applicable transaction cost like applicable stamp duty and other cost for title registration. 158. Replacement cost of houses/buildings has been determined based on construction

67 type, cost of materials, transportation, types of construction, land preparation, labor, and other construction costs at current rates. No deduction for depreciation and transaction costs has been applied. Replacement cost of trees has been determined according to methodologies depending on their timber and/or fruit values. Wood trees have been valued based on girth category (big, medium, small and plan sapling), age, wood value and volume. Fruit un-productive trees will be valued based on age and girth. 159. Big and medium growth fruit trees have been valued considering timber and fruit value at net replacement cost of average annual productivity. Small and sapling fruit trees have been valued based on age without considering fruit productivity. Banana groves have been valued based on age i.e. big and medium are classified those are at or near fruit bearing stage and small and sapling are valued as premature class. Market price of standing crops will be determined at net market rates at the farm gate as per existing practice during handing over land to the RHD by DC.

68 VIII. RELOCATION OFHOUSINGAND SETTLEMENTS 160. Along the JCTE 4-Lane Highway most of the displaced households are commercial enterprises and a few are residential households. The Project will displace households from their residence, business-structures, and productive resources like land, employment and income. The displaced households (DHs) will be provided with compensation and assistance for relocation of their housing, productive assets and employment affected due to the project. They will be encouraged for self-relocation for mutual support and cooperation among them in groups and business communities. A. Scope of Displacement and Relocation

161. A total of 1,033 people will be physically displaced from their present place of residence along 69.30 km road alignment. This includes 401 (38.82%) residential HHs, 613 (59.34%) business enterprises and 19 (1.84%) community properties and 1,033 graves under common property resources and private owners combined (see Table 29 for details). Table29: Relocation Requirements No Nature of Work Package Total % . Displacement 1 2 3 4 1 Residential households 15 123 232 31 401 38.82 Affected

2 Commerce and business 36 296 255 26 613 59.34 enterprises (CBEs) affected

3 Community Properties 2 8 7 2 19 1.84 (CPR) affected Total 53 427 494 59 1,033 100 %

4 Graves under CPR 2 23 96 15 136 and Private Owners Source Census and IOLsurveyJune-August2018

162. The small and medium businesses are found in temporary sheds made of CI sheet and wood/bamboo and some on government land. Grocery shop, tea stall, motor mechanics, vegetables, mobile vendors who has no TIN number are classified as small and medium scale business. The large-scale business has been classified based on investment, volume, TIN, etc, such as whole sale dealer, petrol/CNG station, garment and other industries, etc. B. Options for Relocation 163. As the project will require acquisition and displacement of the residential and commercial establishments all along the project alignment, relocation/ resettlement of the households and commercial enterprises in a particular locationis not feasible. Besides, livelihood of the people is attached with their present place of residence/business. So, relocation from their present location to a distant place will significantly affect their present livelihood status. The affected households and other entities will be encouraged for self-relocation so that they could freely choose the location or best place where they will be comfortable to relocate/ resettle. The project may provide some civic amenities to the EPs if they relocate in clusters.

69 164. During census and IOL survey the DPs (38.82%) residential households preferred to avail of self-relocation with help of the project. They will use the compensation amount to buy new land, construct new structures and resume their economic activities. Among the commercial enterprises about 85% opted for self-relocation while about 15% wanted to be relocated in project sponsored site, if available. The community properties are mostly (96%) interested to be relocated by their own with compensation money. In addition to payment of compensation for affected structures at full replacement cost, the households will be provided with relocation and reconstruction assistance in cash. C. Social Preparation for Relocation 165. The project encourages "self-relocation" by affected households selecting replacement homestead and commercially and in the vicinity of their own. As the SASEC Road Connectivity Project requires linear acquisition alongside the existing RHD road so relocation of the affected households/shops in a particular resettlement site is not feasible, thus DPs /shop owners will be given the freedom to choose suitable location/ place they would want to relocate and rent or transfer their shops. They prefer to transfer to a place near their relatives/kin groups for mutual support and cooperation. 166. The objective of self relocation is to minimize social disruption in the resettlement process and allow people to remain together within kin groups for mutual support. In consultation with the RHD/ PIC, the INGO will assist the AHs/APs to get alternative land for relocation of houses and shops. INGO will liaise with local government institution and Upazila (Sub-district) and District Administration for providing suitable government land (if available) for relocation of the houses and shops. 167. The following were raised by the DPs/ APs during consultation meetings and may be considered during the relocation process (i) project sponsored resettlement site (ii) self-managed resettlement by the affected people (with some assistance from the project), (iii) "host" area benefits, and (iv) lively hood programs in post-relocation period introduced by other externally funded development projects such as Project, Jamuna Bridge project, Jamuna Bridge Access Roads Project) etc. were discussed. D. Integration of DHs with Host Population 168. The "Project Sponsored Resettlement Site "for residential purpose will not be feasible for the residential households along 69.30 km alignment due to scarcity of land. Also, the DHs are not interested to migrate to a resettlement site located faraway from their present residence / business location. They prefer to relocate within the same community where they are currently residing. 169. During consultation meetings, they expressed that there are still available lands within the same community which they could buy and for the shop owners to rent, they do not consider relocation as a major problem as they have strong support system with their relatives and friends in the same community where they currently reside. Intensive consultations with the APs/ AHs and communities will be conducted during project implementation to ensure that they are provided updated information, and in turn they could participate in consultation and decision making.

70 IX. INCOMERESTORATIONAND REHABILITATION 170. Restoration of income of those affected to pre-project level is thus one of the most important tasks in resettlement management. RP has provisions for interim support to mainstream alternative income generating schemes or enhancement of existing livelihood resources so that DP scan either continue their previous occupation or can start new venture or undertake an alternative occupation. 171. The basic objective behind the income restoration and rehabilitation measures is to restore the economic status of the displaced persons at least at the level they were enjoying prior to the project. The project will acquire private lands those include residential land, commercially used land, productive agricultural land and pond. The acquisition and project interventions will also be caused diminishing of income and loss of livelihood resources temporarily or permanently. A. Livelihood impact and Risks 172. As shown in Table 30, a total of 3,593 DHs and persons will experience direct impact on their income, of which 46 D H s will be losing more than10% of their income from agriculture and income other than business. All of the business (1,275) enterprises (running business only) including tenants will lose more than 10%of their income from business. A total of 2,272 wage laborers will lose their job during project period. Table30: Types of income impacts on Displaced HHs/APs Types of income impacts Loss of morethan10%of their income 4 Lossdue toa ofc morequi sit ithanon of la10%ofnd their business income due to the project 1,275 Wage loser 2,272 Total 3,593 Source Census and IOLsurveyJune-August2018

B. Rehabilitation Measures 173. The supplementary RP provisions for income restoration and rehabilitationare the focus on improvement or at least restoration of income and livelihood of all displaced persons. The measures consider diminishing income and dislocation of livelihoods during and after relocation. In addition to providing compensation at full replacement cost, appropriate allowance shave been included for income and livelihood restoration of those affected. 174. All persons losing their livelihood resources or places of generating income as a result of the project will be supported with cash allowances. Cash will be provided for loss of assets and allowances will be provided to supplement the lost income and work days. Appropriate income restoration measures will be considered for their rehabilitation such as (i) compensation for land and structures at full replacement cost prior to relocation; (ii) compensation for crops and trees at current market rate before vacating land for construction; (iii) special allowances for supporting lost income and workdays during the transitional period after relocation; and (iv) special assistance, appropriate to vulnerable groups such as women and very poor households. 175. Other measures income restoration and rehabilitation measures included in the RP (February 2014) for the project will be used as a reference in implementing the supplementary RP (page 65 of original RP, 2014).

71 C. Gender Considerations 176. Compensation for loss of land and property by women will be directly paid to them. Women headed households will get additional support of special cash allowance. They will get preference in employment on site during construction as well as training for income generating programs (IGP).

D. Employment in Construction 177. The Local people whose livelihood is impacted by the project will get preference in jobs associated with the project construction. Female defected people will form labor contracting society (LCS) with the help of INGO and be deployed by the Contract or in road slope turning, watering, tree plantation etc. or any other suitable works. Affected persons will get preferential employment in project civil works based on their eligibility. The jobs, in the semi-skilled and unskilled category, shall be offered to the APs in preference to the other. The general contract conditions will clearly mention this for preferential employment in project work, to project affected people having ID cards. This will also be integrated in the monitoring system for compliance by the contractor(s).

72 X. LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT BUDGET

A. Budget and Financial Plan 188. The costs for LAR for the sub project have been estimated at current market price for the year 2017 with necessary supplements for replacement cost, physical assets and businesses with assessed replacement cost for the same year, and additional assistance for loss of income and vulnerabilities as per the resettlement policy framework. 189. The budget included in the supplementary RP is indicative of out lays for different expenditure categories assessed by census (June- August 2018) for physical assets and estimates of land for acquisition. These costs will be updated and adjusted once the land acquisition boundaries will be finalized and the government adopts a price of land and other assets based on recommendations of PAVC for replacement cost prior to implementation. This proposed budget estimates will be revised based on changes on any additional impacts to be considered during implementation. 190. Replacement cost of land and property will be updated annually if the PAVC at the district level justifies the same at the time of dispossession for any considerable price escalation. Costs for relocation and special assistance will be consistent with the entitlement matrix. Other costs involving project disclosure, public consultations and focus group discussions, surveys, training and income and livelihood restoration, and monitoring and evaluation have been included in the RP. There is also a budget allocation for RP implementation and a 4% contingency over the total budget to meet unforeseen expenditures. The cost estimate in this RP is based on inventory of losses documented as of September 2018 and replacement cost of assets for the year. Therefore, the budget will remain as a dynamic process for cost estimate during implementation. 191. All land acquisition and resettlement funds will be provided by RHD based on the financing plan agreed by the Government of Bangladesh. Relocation of displaced persons, squatters, encroachers and losses, their R&R will be considered as an integral component of the project costs. There habilitation and training to the potential affected persons will be provided under the income and livelihood restoration program based on vulnerability and needs assessed through a special census and consultation exercise. 192. RHD will ensure that the land acquisition budget is delivered on time to the DCs and the resettlement budget in the account of the RHD field offices. RHD will also ensure that the RP is submitted to ADB for concurrence, and that funds for entitlements under the RP is fully provided to DPs prior to the start of the civil work contract. Compensation and resettlement funds will be provided to the DPs in two separate ways: a) Compensation under law for acquisition of land will be disbursed through the DC; and b) Additional assistance for resettlement of project-affected persons will be disbursed by RHD through the NGO. 193. A total of 34.57 ha (85.39Acres=8539 Decimals) land has been proposed for acquisition in four Work Package soft the additional work of JCTE 4-Lane Highway. The compensation budget for land has been calculated based on Mouza-wise rate as per latest estimate of the same project area. Details of the Mouza-wise rate of various categories of land has been described in the detail budget calculation. B. Indicative Summary Budget for Compensation and Resettlement 194. The total indicative budget for implementation of the supplementary RP is about BDT 6,157 million (Six thousand one hundred fifty-seven million) equivalent to USD 74.71 million (1USD=82.42 BDT). Of this, land acquisitional one will require an estimated more than $66.67 million (89.24% of the total budget) due to high value of land. The detailed budget breakdown

73 can be found in Table 31. The detailed presentation of the budget by category of losses is shown Annex 6. Table31: Indicative Summary Budget for Compensation and Resettlement No. Category of Losses Total Indicative Budget (in BDT) A Compensation for land 4,110,177,391 B Other Resettlement Benefits for land 270,266,588 C Compensation for structure 1,318,972,071 D Resettlement Benefits related to loss of Structure 37,663,925 E Compensation for Tube-well and Toilet 9,239,000 F Compensation for Trees 65,663,230 G Loss of Fruits 7,363,737 H Resettlement Benefits for business loss 25,528,950 I Resettlement Benefits for wage labors 53,775,000 J Resettlement Benefits for tenants and others 21,760,900 Total (BDT) 5,920,410,791 Allocation for unforeseen Cost for Deputy 236,816,432 Commissioners’ administrative cost, GRC cases, LA support cost, Documentation cost for disbursement of compensation and resettlement, statistical and other uncertainties 4% of the Total Grand Total 6,157,227,223 Source: Property valuation survey, recent development projects and policy matrix of the RP (Detailed Budget/ Calculation is in Annex-6)

C. Assessment of Unit Cost for Land and Assets 195. For preparation of an indicative budget as integral part of the Resettlement Plan, the unit cost for Land, structure, trees, crops and other physical assets has been calculated. The price assessed during preparation of the RP includes CCL to be assessed by DCs during land acquisition process. 1. Replacement Cost for Land 196. The price of land in Bangladesh varies substantially depending on productivity, commercial utility, proximity to urban centers and access to roads. Therefore, land price, also varies within a given geographical boundary like the smallest land administrative unit called "Mouza". The DCs determines mouza-wise price by "Land Categories "which differ from mouza to mouza. Deputy Commissioner Land has been valued at price of same project Phase 1 (approved LA estimates). Additional 200% premium on Mouza Rate has been considered in determining DC's rate during calculation of the budget as per Act 2017. Although assessing CCL value at this moment is difficult as the LA process is not yet started, never the less, a lawful compensation based on Mouza Rate has been calculated to differentiate additional compensation for land as per policy of the RP. 159 The land losers purchasing replacement land will be provided with replacement cost that Includes titling cost and the current market price. 197. A property valuation survey will be conducted by the PPAVC and the Replacement Value (RV) will be determined prior to the payment of additional compensation by RHD to match market prices. In case of compensation for structure, a depreciation cost is deducted

74 from the value assessed for the structure. The affected households get the compensation plus the structure and all salvages. As a result, the total value received CCL from DC and the affected structure itself) is typically more than the replacement value. This is also true in case of trees as the trees are given to the owners. 2. Compensation and Other Benefits 198. The houses / buildings have been valued at replacement cost based on cost of materials, type of construction, labor, and transport and other construction costs. Trees have been valued based on age and girth category (i) big, (ii) medium, (iii) small and(iv)sapling, separately for timber and fruit bearing trees as per the rate. 199. The rate used by the Department of Forest in 2017 was used as reference. The fruits have been valued for grown up trees (big and medium) as 30%of the timber value of one year. Crop value has been determined on the basis of current market price of paddy per mound (40Kg) and gross production. 200. The Transfer Grant (TG) for residential and community structures has been calculated at BDT7 per square feet, and at BDT10 for commercial structures. Reconstruction grant for structures has been calculated at BDT 10 per square ft. for residential and community structures while at BDT 15 for commercial structure. 201. Additional one-time cash grant for vulnerable households i.e., BDT 12,000 for female headed and BDT10,000 for male headed house holds. Training on income generating alternatives will bear ranged by the INGO for the poor and vulnerable households at BDT15,000 per HH. The local people especially affected poor and vulnerable people will be preferentially employed in project civil works, and the EPs will be allowed to take salvage materials free of cost. D. Approval of the Resettlement Budget 202. The LAR budget included in the RP will need to be approved by the MORTB, and the mount proposed for the implementation of the supplementary RP has not exceeded the budget for LAR included in the revised DPP submitted by RHD to MORT/ ADB in February 2014. 203. The DC will preparethe estimates for compensation including administrative cost and produce that to the RHD for placement of fund within 60 days. The rates for compensation and cash entitlements for rehabilitation as well as allowances payable to Ahs will be adjusted annually, based on the actual annual inflation rate. RHD will determine the annual inflation rates to be applied to all cash entitlements in each year. The INGO engaged by RHD/PIC to implement the RP will assist the resettlement unit (RU) of PIU. RHD to prepare final resettlement budgets covering all eligible loss and entitlements confirmed through joint verification and determination of replacement market price of land and property by PAVC. Payment of additional compensation and resettlement benefits will be started after approval of such budget. E. Management of Compensation and Flow of Awards 204. For the payment of grants/ compensation to DPs/APs, RHD will follow the same rules and procedures as stated in the original RP (February 2014) which has been approved by ADB and MORTB for the project. Compensation under law for land acquisition will be paid to the legal owners of land and property by the concerned DCs of the LA section. DC will prepare individual cheques accompanied with receiving copies of payment and undertaking note.

75

205. The INGO will collect CCL copy from the DC office and prepare statement, entitled person's file, entitlement card, indent and other necessary documents for making payment of resettlement benefit. In case of non-tiled holder the INGO will prepare all necessary documents based on the joint verification survey data and arrange payment of resettlement benefit to the EPs. The original payment Voucher with necessary revenue stamp will be submitted to the PIU office on a regular basis. 26

26 For detailed information, refer to RP for SASEC Road Project prepared by RHD in Feb. 2014.

76

XI. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 206. The RHD under the MORTis representing the GOB as the Executing Agency (EA) of the SASEC Road Connectivity Project. RHD is responsible for undertaking all studies, design, and construction of this Project. It will also be responsible for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of the project after its completion, and is mandated to undertake steps, as per guide lines of the MORTB and advice of the GOB secure required funds both from external and internal sources for the implementation of the Project. RHDhas over 25yearsin implementing projects funded by ADB, WB and other partner agencies. It has also extensive experience in implementing RPs for relevant projects. The activities/ procedures comprehensively explained in the RP (February 2014) relevant to the implementation of the project including RP will be followed. 207. RHD has a separate Social and Environmental Circle (SEC) at HQ headed by a Superintending Engineer to look after safeguard issue so fall of the projects to be executed by the RHD. Besides, each of the projects including SASEC JCTE 4-Lane Highway has a setup to deal with social and resettlement issues headed by Chief Resettlement Officer (CRO). A. Institutional Arrangement 1. Project implementation Unit–RHD 208. Project Implementation Unit (PIU), headed by a Project Director (PD), has already been set up within RHD for execution of the Project who is responsible for implementation of the RP- assistance disbursement and resettlement of the DPs including income restoration. RHD will work together with the DCs for acquisition of land for the Project. The Additional Project Director at Head Office will function as the Chief Resettlement Officer (CRO). The CRO will have overall responsibility relating to resettlement and rehabilitation policy guidance, coordination, planning, monitoring and reporting. Secretarial Staffs at Head Office will assist the CRO. 209. At the field level, the CRO will be assisted by Project Managers (PMs or DCROs) and Deputy Project Managers (DPM) and other field staffs. Besides, NGO will be appointed for the implementation of the supplementary RP. The resettlement expert of the Project Implementation Consultant (PIC) would be engaged to carry out internal monitoring and evaluation of the project. Deployment of External Monitoring Agency (EMA) will not be required for the project and therefore RP kept no provision of external monitoring and budget. 210. The Project Manager will be of the rank of Executive Engineer and look after the resettlement and rehabilitation component to the project as Deputy Chief Resettlement Officer (DCRO). Project Managers will be stationed at the PD's office. One Deputy Project Manager will assist the Project Manager. The PD and CRO will monitor through APD, the progress of land acquisition and resettlement management and will also ensure co-ordination between various relevant offices, particularly the Office of DCs. RHD will establish operational links with the Office of DCs for land acquisition. It will provide means and mechanism for coordinating the delivery of the compensation and assistance to entitled persons. It will also be responsible for disseminating information to the public and provide opportunities for consultations. 211. Specific tasks of the RHD’s CRO includes the following: (i) Oversee overall resettlement and rehabilitation works; (ii) Coordinate with office of DCs to facilitate LA, payment of compensation and possession of land; (ii) Coordinate the implementation of

77 resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) activities with Head Office and field Office; (iii) Ensure conducting resettlement training programs for EA staff for capacity building as well as field level NGOs and partner agencies capacities; (iv) Monitor progress of implementation of the RP/ supplementary RP, and other related tasks. The detailed functions presented in the project’s RP February 2014 will be followed in implementing the RP/ supplementary RP. 2. RHD-Field Offices 212. The RHD field offices will be assisted by the INGO in performing their duties. The field offices will coordinate with the Office of DCs for LA and CCL payment, possession of land, clearance of proposed ROW, etc. The PM will monitor all R&R activities and progress of civil works and project management. The DPM/ Rresettlement Officer (RO) will assist him in discharging his duties. The RO will be dealing all matters related to resettlement and rehabilitation. 213. Some of the responsibilities of the RO are (i) Maintain liaison and provide requisite materials, papers, etc, to the Office of Deputy Commissioner for timely acquisition of land and payment of compensation; (ii) Synchronize various activities related to resettlement and rehabilitation with construction schedule; (iii) Ensure that entitled person shave received their due compensation and assistance; (iv) Assist and advice CRO and RO in matters related to R&R; (v) Ensure distribution of pamphlets on R&R policy by the INGO in local language; (vi) Supervise the implementation of RP carried out by the INGO and participate in activities carried out by INGO; (vii) Attend meetings and participate in Grievance Redress Committee meetings for redress of grievances; (viii) Ensure budgetary provision for relocation, rehabilitation and reconstruction of CRP; (ix) Perform other relevant tasks stated in project’s RP February 2014. 3. Deputy Commissioner's Office(s) 214. The DC has the legal responsibility of acquiring land and paying compensation directly to the EPs as per the Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Act, 2017; has access to official record and the Legal administrative authority for determining updated title of land eligibility of EPs for CCL for land, as well as other assets covered by the law. The EA and the implementing NGO assisting the EA will work with the representatives of the DCs during Joint Verification of affected properties and the market survey. 215. The DC offices will receive funds for CCL from RHD for payment to the directly affected persons immediately to facilitate quick disbursement of differentials, if any, by RHD with assistance from the INGO.Thus, DC’s active role and cooperation is essential to ensure implementation of the RP. Participation of the DCis necessary in host area meetings; and intervention/assistance in matters such as disposal of land ownership disputes, allotment of surplus land for construction of community properties, if necessary. 4. Implementing INGO 216. The INGO will be a facilitator and a link between the Project Authority and the APs/ AHs; conduct consultations with the APs/ AHs; engage them in a meaningful consultation and participation; disclose information relevant to RP/ supplementary RP and assist RHD/ PIC in implementing the RP. Some of the tasks of the INGO are (i) Collect IOL established through Census/SES; from the Detailed Design Consultantsm and works closely with RHD and PIC consultants; (ii) Reconciliation of Census and prepare data base for AHs; (iii) Participate with DC and RHD for carrying out Joint Verification Survey (JVS); (iv) Collect LA Plans and land

78 schedule/plot index approved by DC; (v) Carryout information dissemination activities to create awareness about the project, prepare and disseminate book let and poster in the affected areas and communities. Assist in valuation of properties/assets for finalization of replacement cost. Preparation and approval of micro plan for disbursement of R&R assistance; (vi) Ensure delivery of full entitlements to APs/ AHs as stated in the entitlement matrix; (vii) Ensure proper utilization of compensation and resettlement assistance available under the R&R package; (viii) conduct monitoring and prepare required reports to be submitted to RHD/ PIC; and (ix) Perform relevant tasks as stated in the contract / TOR issued by RHD/PIC. 217. All resettlement related data, including land acquisition and census will be collected and computerized by the NGO to prepare a resettlement data bank and made available to RHD. The data bank will act as the key source of information for implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the RP implementation successes and failure. EP files on individual households will be prepared for processing entitlement, checking and verifying the losses. The file will contain detailed socio-economic and data on individual households and lost assets. 218. An entitlement card will be prepared containing the summarized losses but detailed entitlement. A Payment statement should also be prepared to reflect the entitlement as well as the payment made. The data bank will enhance institutional capacity of both RHD and the implementing NGO in resettlement management of the project. The detailed responsibilities of the INGO outlined in the project’s RP (February 2014) should be carried out during the implementation of the RP/ supplementary RP. 5. Resettlement Management Committees (RMCs) 219. To arietta fair compensation sufficient to cover replacement cost of the lost resources, formation of a PVAV is considered important for each district. Again, to redress a mechanism to dispose of the complaints out of court as per RP, for setting up a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) for each area is also felting dispensable. In order to ensure collective sharing of responsibilities, PAVC need to be formed with representatives, drawn from RHD, District Administration, implementing NGO and GRC with representatives of the RHD, NGO, EPs including UP chairman and women members of U/Ps under administrative order of the MORT with appropriate legal authorities. B. Property Assessment and Valuation Committee (PAVC) 220. The PAVC is already in placed in the project. Its main task is to undertake a plot to plot survey in the affected areas, using a structured questionnaire, for determining the actual quantum of losses suffered by the AP, compare these data with the assessment made by the DC and establish the estimate of compensation for acquisition of land, loss of livelihood and resettlement using those loss data and current replacement cost of lost assets ascertained by the PAVC to verify the survey result in the areas where land will be acquired for the project and establish the current market price(CMP). CMP in addition to the cost of registration will be equivalent to the replacement cost for different properties at different locations. PVAC will also find out the prices of other properties in the same manner. 221. The PAVC will be composed of the following (i) One representative of RHD, minimum at the level of Executive Engineer, to be nominated by the PD, RHD, as convener; (ii) One representative of the DC to be nominated by concerned DC; and (iii) Area Manager of the INGO

79

The GRM process in Flow Chart in RP Feb 2014 will still be utilized for the implementation of the supplementary RP which was already approved by MoRTB. C. Resettlement Advisory Committees (RAC) 222. As stated in the RP February 2014, the INGO will form a RAC at each area with the approval of the PD, and the committee shall involve local communities and DPs in the RP implementation process. The RAC will ensure local participation, provide local participation, local inputs and assist in all matters related to implementation of RP/ SRP. The RAC will be comprised of the following (i) ne representative of RHD, at least the level of Executive Engineer, to be nominated by PD, RHD as chairman; (ii) Area Manager of the INGO as member-secretary; (iii) Representative from CBO; (iv) Representative of women CBO; (v) Elected representatives of the area; (vi) local teacher; and (vi) Local Imam of Mosque. To date the RAC still needs to be strengthened. 1. Resettlement Consultants 223. The PIC’s Resettlement Consultants acting on behalf of the Project and RHD will ensure that the sound methodologies and practices are used in the implementation of RP. The consultants will advise on any changes in the modalities of the implementation work, participate in meetings with the INGO and RHD, and monitor the work of the implementing NGO (INGO) in the field. 224. The consultants will also review, on behalf of PD, RHD, and implementation progress report submitted by the NGO on a regular basis. Overall, the RCs (national and international) will be responsible for monitoring, preparation of progress reports and ensure that the activities included in the RP are being implemented and will work closely with the INGO and RHD with functions relevant to LAR. 225. The national resettlement expert will monitor the day- to-day progress in RP implementation and also prepare the monthly progress report to be included in overall monthly progress report of the project. The input of international resettlement expert will be of intermittent nature. He will be assisted directly by the national experts of the project. able 31 shows the institutional responsibilities of various parties in the implementation of the RP and resettlement process (see Table 32). Table32: Institutional Responsibilities in Resettlement Process Related Activities and Responsibilities Responsibility Recruitment of RP Implementing NGO PIU Design and reproduction of RP information Brochures INGO/PIU Disclosure and public consultations INGO/PIU Formation of committees (PAVC, GRC) MOC Selection of members of the PAVC and GRC PIU/INGO Selection of members for Resettlement Advisory Committees (RAC) PIU/INGO/LGI Design and carryout joint verification survey DC/PIU/INGO Market survey on prices of affected structure INGO/PAVC Establishment of unit prices PAVC/PIU Processing the Joint verification survey data of DPs INGO Assessing Ahs and vulnerable DPs to be relocated INGO/PIU Determination of entitlements and consultations with individual DPs INGO/PIU Disclosure of RP to RHD, DPs and stakeholders PIU/INGO

80

Mobilization of GRC PIU/INGO Establishment of internal monitoring RHD(PIU) Budget approval for compensation and resettlement benefits MOC Release of funds for payment of compensation/resettlement benefits RHD(PIU) Pavement of compensation/resettlement benefits PIU/INGO Filing and resolution of complaints of DPs PIU/GRCs/INGO Confirmation of "No Objection" for the award of civil works contract ADB Relocation and lively hood restoration assistance INGO/PIU internal monitoring and evaluation PIU/PIC Source: RHD, RP February 2014.

2. Timetable of RP Implementation Planning 226. RHD will be assisted by the PIC and INGO in implementing the RP activities and process. The RHD assisted by the Project Implementation Consultants (PIC) is primarily responsible for preparing the supplementary RP. RHD will be assisted by the INGO to be engaged by RHD to implement the activities/ process relevant to RP, and the PIC resettlement specialists. Coordination will be done at all levels, at the project field units and headquarters of RHD. The indicative implementation schedule for the supplementary RP is shown in Table 33. Table 33: Indicative Implementation Schedule No. RP Related Tasks/ Activities Start Finish 1 Census/ Inventory of Losses and SES June 18 August 18 2 Data entry/ processing and analysis of survey results August 18 Sept 18 3 Preparation of Supplementary RP Sept 18 October 18 4 Review of draft supplementary RP by RHD 14Oct18 16Oct 18 5 Submission of draft supplementary RP to ADB 16Oct 17Oct 18 6 Revision of supplementary RP after ADB review, and ADB Oct 18 Nov 18 approval 7 Design and reproduction of RP Information Booklet Dec 18 Dec 18 8 Disclosure and public consultations of approved RP Jan 18 31May20 9 LAPs submitted to DC 16Sept18 30Nov 18 10 CarryoutLA by DCs (DLAC or CLAC, issue of notice under 30Sept 18 31Aug 19 Section 4, joint verification by AB and RHD/INGO, Notice under Section7, Section 8. Preparation of budget and Notice. 11 Release of funds for payment of compensation to DC 1Feb19 30June19 By RHD 12 Cash compensation under law (CCL) 7Feb19 31May20 13 Payment of additional compensation/resettlement benefits 1Apr19 15June20 to s quat ters a nd lando wners 14 Civil works able to start early where the sites are free of 15Feb19 As per encumbrances. (RHD can start this process after joint contract verification survey) 15 Recruitment of RP implementing NGO 20Sept 18 30June20 16 Formation and selection of members for committees Already formed by (PAVC, GRC) Ministry 17 Deployment and orientation of INGO 20Sept18 21Sept18 staff . Mobil izati on of PIU p ersonnel 18 Design and carry out property valuation survey by 30Sept18 30Aug19 property assessment and Valuation committee (PAVC) 19 Determination of individual entitlement 15 Oct18 30Dec19 (issuance of ID Cards. Indents etc.)

81

20 Finalization of compensation and Resettlement budget 1 Feb19 31Dec19 based on PAVC findings and submit to RHD for approval 21 Approval of budget by RHD 15Mar19 15Jan20 22 Monitoring/reporting results of RP implementation Semi annual Note: The schedule will be updated after ADB approval of the supplementary RP.

227. The schedule will be updated before implementation of the supplementary RP once approved by RHD/ ADB. The timeline for the implementation of the RP activities in graph form is shown in Annex 7.

82

XII. MONITORING AND REPORTING

228. The responsibility and obligations of carrying out monitoring and reporting of the RP implementation will be carried out by the Additional PD as the CRO for the project. Monitoring will continue until the end of the RP implementation. Components of monitoring will include performance monitoring i.e., physical progress of the work and impact monitoring and evaluation. Internal monitoring will be carried out by the RHD while PIC/ Resettlement Specialists will conduct periodic monitoring and evaluation of the RP implementation. Resettlement Specialists (International and National) will act as External Monitoring Agency (EMA) and will carry out/ prepare the semi-annual social monitoring (SMR), mid-term, and final evaluation, andwill recommend appropriate measures, if required. A. Objectives of Monitoring 229. Monitoring will enable PIU to get feedback from target population and the field operatives to devise corrective measures to ensure achievement of targets within schedule. The objectives of M&E will enhance the delivery capacity of the PIU and maximize benefits of RP packages to the affected persons and the host communities. Further, it will ensure that inputs are provided, procedures are followed, and outputs are monitored and verified as per approved plan and schedule of actions. Identifying lapses and failures at implementation process, PIU will undertake timely management actions. B. Scope of Monitoring 230. RHD field offices will conduct field level monitoring and assess the daily operation of land acquisition, payment of compensation, identification of entitled persons physically, and processing their entitlements, relocation and resettlement. A benchmark database will be developed for the purpose of ongoing monitoring and post evaluation of the RP targets. 231. The following are some of the key indicators to be considered during monitoring of resettlement activities and process: (i) Timely provision of compensation and assistance to and transfer of APs AHs from the affected parcel to the remaining area of agricultural land; (ii) Meaningful consultation and information dissemination; (iii) Participation of APs/ AHs including women and other vulnerable groups, and other stakeholders throughout the resettlement process; (iv) Effectiveness of the related parties/ resettlement committees in planning and implementation of resettlement including timely and satisfactory resolution of any grievances related to resettlement; (v) Changes in the pre and post-condition of AHs and their ability to re-establish or improve their livelihoods and living standards. 232. The detailed list of monitoring indicators for process, output and impacts are stated in the project’s RP (February 2014, pages 104 to 105).

83

C. Institutional Arrangements for Monitoring and Reporting 233. RHD assisted by the PIC resettlement consultants will carry out internal monitoring, evaluation and reporting of RP implementation in coordination with the RHD field offices, and implementing NGO. ADB will conduct annual review missions for the compliance monitoring. The project affected persons, their community and local level NGOs will also participate in the process. The scope of monitoring and evaluation in various stages of RP implementation, approach and methodology, and persons responsible with specific functions are also defined or discussed in RP February 2014 (pages 103 to 107). D. Reporting Requirements 234. ADB requires a semi-annual social monitoring report (SMR) be prepared by RHD. The PIC resettlement consultants will prepare the report in coordination with the RHD officers and PIC technical team in Dhaka and at the project sites. The SMR is a document of the RHD which includes progress on the implementation of the RP, key issues and concerns, and recommendations. 235. Preparation of the SMR is done on a regular basis twice a year) since 2015 and is still in progress. A similar SMR will be prepared for the project’s new scope of works (SMVT lane and structures). The INGO will prepare/ submit monthly progress report (MPR) to RHD/ PIC highlighting progress, issues, constraints, targets for every month, recommendations, and other relevant information. Table 34 shows the summary of the reports required by ADB, including timeline and persons/ agencies responsible. Table 34: Reporting Requirements No. Activity Content Timeline Responsibility 1 Monthly Narrative as per monitoring Submitted INGO Progress plan format; progress of the within 10 Report activities; key issues/ days of the (MPR) concerns, corrective action if next month any, and recommendations, 2 Semi-annual Progress of the RP activities, Submitted PIC/ Monitoring key issues/ concerns and within 30 Resettlement Report corrective actions if any, days of end Consultants (SMR) updates on LA, payment of of project Specialists compensation, highlights of cycle (consultants) consultations with the as/ DHs, etc. Conducted during monitoring at the sites; reco mmendations, etc. 3 Annual Narrative as per monitoring Submitted PD/DPD Chief Progress program on resettlement and within 60 Resettlement Report relocation (LAR) related days of the Officer (CRO) issues relevant to RP end of the impl ementation previous year 4 Final Report Project achievements, Submitted PIC impacts/ outcome, lessons within 60 learned and days of end recommendations of the project

84

ANNEXURES

85

Annex 1:

Gap Analysis Between the Government of Bangladesh and ADB SPS, 2009

86 Gap Analysis between GoB laws and ADB SPS 2009 Safeguard measures to Gaps between bridge the gaps between Aspect GOB Act 2017 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS and GOB Law in and GOB policy this project Objectives 1. Avoid Avoidance of Avoid involuntary Gaps with Resettlement Plan (RP) involuntary resettlement is not resettlement regard to this adheres to this principle- i.e., resettlement specifically mentioned wherever possible principle to avoid resettlement impacts in the Act 2017 – focus avoid where feasible on mitigation than resettlement avoidance. impact thru alternative options. 2. Minimize The law only implicitly Minimize Section 4/under - Minimize displacement of involuntary discourages involuntary Act 2017 people as much as possible resettlement unnecessary and resettlement by requires by exploring all viable design excess land exploring project notification only; alternatives. acquisition, as excess and design no consultation - If unavoidable, provide for land remains idle and alternatives is required prompt payment of adequate unused and lands compensation, replacement acquired for one cost (for lost assets and purpose cannot be income) and rehabilitation used for a different and livelihood assistance, purpose. Land that towards better condition remains unused should than before relocation for all be returned to the displaced households original owner(s). regardless of title to land 3. Mitigate The mitigation To enhance, or at Only Provision for replacement adverse social measures are cash least restore, the cash-based value for assets lost (i.e. impacts compensation only for livelihoods of all compensation structures, trees, etc.) at lost assets. The affected persons in for acquired replacement cost. Other complexities of real terms relative assets. The resettlement benefits are to resettlement are not to pre-project impacts of loss be provided. addressed by the levels; and to of houses and RP is to be disclosed to the Ordinance improve the the need for community in Bengali standards of living resettlement are version. of the displaced not considered. poor and other vulnerable groups. Core Principles 1. Identify, The Act 2017 requires Screen the project Impact RP requires identification of assess and preparation of a Land early on to identify assessments impacts caused by address the Acquisition Plan (LAP) past, present and are typically displacement whether or not potential social for land acquisition (if future involuntary done in the case through land acquisition and economic any) and compensation resettlement of externally (maintaining the principle impacts purposes. However, impacts and risks. funded projects; that lack of formal title to GOB environmental Determine the otherwise, land should not be a bar to rules/guidelines scope of Project impacts compensation and synchronize various resettlement on properties, resettlement assistance), applicable laws and planning through a livelihoods and including number of affected policy frameworks of survey and/or employment, persons. The RP also the country for early census of displaced are discussed in addresses indirect impacts. identification of impacts persons, including RP and provide on biophysical, gender analysis, enough socioeconomic and specifically related information to cultural environment of to resettlement determine a project intervention impacts and risks losses and basis and their mitigation. for Requires the compensation. assessment of Existing laws do

87 Safeguard measures to Gaps between bridge the gaps between Aspect GOB Act 2017 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS and GOB Law in and GOB policy this project technical alternatives, not have including the no action provision for alternative to minimize identification of adverse environmental indigenous impacts, include impact people to on human health and recognize their safety. particular problem and inconveniences due to a project. 2. Prepare The Deputy Develop Existing law and Resettlement Framework of mitigation plans Commissioners (DCs) resettlement plan methods of the project requires full for affected have the mandate in on the basis of assessment do census and/or updating, persons their respective assessment during not ensure full where possible, for jurisdiction as per law project processing, replacement up-to-date database. RPs to acquire land for any with the intent that cost of property will be developed on the requiring person (public plan will guide at current updated survey data agency or private refinements of market price. person). The requiring impact estimates The law does Provide guidelines to ensure body requests the and mitigating not consider displaced persons and Deputy Commissioners measures as resettlement or communities’ compensation for acquisition of land project parameters rehabilitation of for lost assets at full for their are finalized. affected persons replacement costs and other project/scheme. DCs or their loss of assistance to help them investigate physically income or improve or at least restore the requirement of land livelihood their standard of living at and carry out Joint resources. pre-project level. Includes Verifications of assets “Market value” special attention to gender and type of land for of property is and preparation of gender assessing the quantity often found low action plan of losses of the law). in respect of Affected titled holders current market receive the assessed price, it can be value and 200% for raised, if land and 100% on appealed, by a others for compulsory maximum of 10 acquisition percent each Fair compensation is time which in required for acquisition most case is not of land which is sufficient to dependent on recorded match with real data with relevant market price. government agencies (sub-registrar’s office for land, PWD for structure, DAE for crops, DOF for trees, etc.). Affected owners have the right to appeal on acquisition or on the compensation amounts determined as per law.

88 Safeguard measures to Gaps between bridge the gaps between Aspect GOB Act 2017 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS and GOB Law in and GOB policy this project 3. Consider Feasibility studies Explore viable No specific laws RP considers feasible alternative including social, alternative project for considering alternative project design to project design political, cultural and designs to avoid project design to avoid or at least minimize environmental impact and/or minimize avoid or physical or economic assessments, detailed involuntary minimize displacement, while engineering surveys as resettlement. involuntary balancing environmental, basis for acquisition of resettlement. social, technical and private property or Feasibility study financial costs and benefits. rights. considers cost-benefit more from technical than socio-cultural considerations 4. Involve and The Act 2017 have Carry out There is no RP has provisions for consult with provisions (Section 4) meaningful provision in the community consultation and stakeholders to notify the owners of consultations with law for public disclosure of impacts property to be affected persons, consulting the as well as mitigation acquired. host communities, stakeholders but measures, including and concerned the land disclosure of Resettlement Any party having any Agencies/ allocation Plan. Further, grievances objections can appear Government committees at redress procedures to DC for a hearing with organizations. district, division involving cross-section of 15 days of notification. Inform all displaced and central people, including persons of their government representative of affected entitlements and level. persons, have been resettlement People have established for options. Ensure limited scope to accountability and their participation in negotiate with democratization of the planning, the government development process implementation and on the price of M&E of land, but have resettlement no right to programs. Pay refuse particular attention acquisition. to the needs of the vulnerable groups, especially those below poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children and Indigenous people, and those without title to land, and ensure their participation in consultations. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the DPs concerns. Support the social and cultural institutions of displaced

89 Safeguard measures to Gaps between bridge the gaps between Aspect GOB Act 2017 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS and GOB Law in and GOB policy this project persons and their host population. 5. Disclose and The Act 2017 requires Disclose the Disclosure takes RP requires disclosure of inform DPs of RP a “notice” to be resettlement plan place in case of Draft RPs to the affected and mitigation published at and other relevant donor-funded communities in a form or measures convenient places on information in a projects. language(s) that are or near the property in form and understandable to key a prescribed form and language(s) stakeholders, civil society, manner stating that accessible to key particularly affected groups the property is stakeholders, civil and the general public in a proposed to be society, particularly national workshop. acquired (u/section 4). affected groups and Further, updated RPs will be the general public. disclosed based on material changes as a result of the concerns of affected families. 6. Support No provision in the Act Ensure that the No provision in Following good practices in existing social 2017. existing social and any existing other resettlement project and cultural cultural institutions laws. i.e. Padma and Jamuna institutions of the are supported and Bridge Project, the RP has affected persons used to the extent provisions to enhance possible, including carrying capacity of the host legal, policy and villages in post-relocation institutional period. framework of the country to the extent that the intent and spirit of the IR policy is maintained. 7. Build capacity No provision in the Act Assist in building There is no law Resettlement supervision in of the 2017. capacity of DMCs or directives on the Sub-Regional Transport borrower(s) on best practice on the supervision project (Road Component) in IR involuntary of the land will follow best practices of implementation resettlement acquisition other similar type of planning and process by resettlement projects in the implementation Deputy country. Mid-term review of Commissioner. resettlement performance and regular supervision of resettlement operations by the RHD. 8. Social No provision in the Act The borrower/client There is no Census and Socioeconomic Assessment 2017 will conduct provision in the survey, consultation socioeconomic law for meetings with video filming surveys and a conducting of the alignment is done. census, with census or appropriate socioeconomic socioeconomic surveys except baseline data to video filming identify all persons and joint who will be verification of displaced by the the property project and to within the assess the project’s proposed right socioeconomic of way. impacts on them. As part of the social

90 Safeguard measures to Gaps between bridge the gaps between Aspect GOB Act 2017 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS and GOB Law in and GOB policy this project impact assessment, the borrower will identify individuals and groups who may be differentially or is proportionately affected by the project because of their disadvantaged or vulnerable status. 9. Resettlement No provision The borrower will No provision in Resettlement plan is Plan prepare a the law of prepared for the project resettlement plan, if preparation of where there are land the proposed the resettlement acquisition and involuntary project, will have plan resettlement impacts. involuntary resettlement impacts. The objective of the Resettlement plans will elaborate of displaced persons entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget and a time-bound implementation schedule. 10. Monitoring The Act 2017 has The borrower will No benefit of the RP has provision for internal provision that the DC monitor and affected monitoring by RHD and will monitor and submit measure the peoples. Supervision Consultants and a statement to the progress of external monitoring by an Government annually implementation of independent monitor during about the properties the resettlement implementation period. acquired for different plan. For projects requiring bodies and with significant mode of utilization of involuntary the land. resettlement impacts, the borrower will retain qualified and experienced external experts or qualified agencies to verify the borrowers monitoring information. The borrower will prepare semi-annual

91 Safeguard measures to Gaps between bridge the gaps between Aspect GOB Act 2017 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS 2009 ADB SPS and GOB Law in and GOB policy this project monitoring reports that describe the progress of the implementation of the resettlement activities and any compliance issues and corrective actions. 11. Evaluation No provision for For every project an No provision. An independent reviewer (a evaluations of the impact senior level Resettlement post-displaced lives of assessment/evaluat Specialist) will conduct the affected ion is done. evaluation of the households and performance of resettlement communities operations as well as impacts of resettlement during and after implementation of resettlement plan to assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impacts, and sustainability. The evaluations to reflect broadly on the success or weaknesses in RP implementation and “lessons learned.” Source: RHD. RP for SASEC Road Connectivity Project, Feb. 2014.

92

Annex 2: Consultation Meetings with Project Affected Persons/Stakeholders, (Highlights of the Consultation Meetings/ FGDs, Pictures and Attendance)

93 Consultation Meetings with Project Affected Persons/Stakeholders, Discussion and Main Outcome

Six (6) Consultation meetings were organized in the process of the preparation of this Supplementary Resettlement Plan including Census survey. A total of 221 affected persons/stakeholders participated in the 6 meetings. The location, date and participants to these meetings are described below.

Summary of Consultations Conducted and Number of Participants by Location

Date and Location Type of Participants Number of Time Participants Male Female 7 August Mirzapur Local Elected Government Representative, School 26 11 2018 Bypass, Teacher, local elite, Affected land owners, Tangail. businessmen, non-title holders, EA’s representative, NGO’s representatives. 11 August Pakullya Teacher, Squatters, businessmen, land owners, 23 14 2018 Bazar, wage laborers, NGO’s representatives, local elite. Tangail. 11 August Natiapara Local Elected Government Representative, local 38 0 2018 Bazar, elite, Affected land owners, businessmen, non-title Tangail. holders, NGO’s representatives. 12 August Motra Land owners, business owners, local elites, 35 1 2018 Bazar, religious leader, Squatters, Tenants, Wage Tangail labourers, NGO’s representatives. 18 August Vathkura, Land owners, businessmen, local elites, teacher, 37 0 2018 Tangail. religious leaders, squatters, NGO’s representatives. 18 August Kathalia, Teacher, Squatters, businessmen, land owners, 36 0 2018 Kaliakoir, wage laborers, NGO’s representatives, local elite. Gazipur. Source: CCDB, September 2018 Report.

In these meetings the Land Acquisition Act 2017, the Resettlement packages of the ADB policy and RP Entitlement matrix were disclosed to the participants. The following points and discussions were raised by the participants:

 The Joint Verification Survey will be done by PAVC to identify all titleholders and non-title holders under the Project Right of way (RoW);  All affected persons identified in the survey will get a Project ID card containing their losses, a picture and signature;  RHD/NGO will pay resettlement benefits to the affected persons as per ADB policy and approved entitlement matrix. The value of these will be determined by the Deputy Commissioner and PAVC based on the Act 2017, entitlement matrix and will be approved by the Government;  NGO/EA representatives stated that all payments will be made in due time and they should prepare to relocate;  The NGO Area manager briefed the participants on the Grievance Redress Mechanism;  In this meeting title holder persons raised that DC’s Mouza Rate/Market Price for land is very poor including 200%. They demanded the fair Market Price for their

94 affected land.  Main Outcome: Affected Persons demanded the fair Market Price for land and the quick payment for their affected losses without any harassment. No.01. Consultation Meeting Area- angail, Baour Kumar Jani & Mirzapur By Passa, Tangail Participants 37, Date: 07-08-18. (source: CCDB, September 2018 Report)

Note: Pictures and attendance during the consultation meeting are shown below.

95

96

97

98

No.2. Consultation Meeting Area-Tangail, Pakullya Bazar, Tangail Participants 37, Date: 11-08-18 (source: CCDB, September 2018 Report)

Note: Pictures and attendance during the consultation meeting are shown below.

99

100 101

102 No.3. Consultation Meeting Area-Natia Para Bazar, Tangail Participants 38, Date: 11-08-18 (source: CCDB, September 2018 Report)

Note: Pictures and attendance during the consultation meeting are shown below.

103

104

105

106

No.4. Consultation Meeting Area-Motora Bazar, Tangail Participants 36, Date: 12-08-18 (source: CCDB, September 2018 Report)

Note: Pictures and attendance during the consultation meeting are shown below.

107

108

109

110

No.5. Consultation Meeting Area-Vatkura, Tangail Participants 37, Date: 18-08-18 (Source: CCDB, Sept. 2018 Report)

Note: Pictures and attendance during the consultation meeting are shown below.

111

112

113

114

No.6. Consultation Meeting Area- Kathalia, Kaliakoir, Gazipur Participants 36, Date: 18-08-18 (Source: CCDB, Sept. 2018 Report)

Note: Pictures and attendance during the consultation meeting are shown below.

115

116

117

118 Annex 1.1:

Site Visits Conducted by the PIC and CCDB (Implementing NGO) in the New Proposed SMVT Lane on 30 September 2018 (SASEC Road Connectivity Project) Prepared by PIC: Resettlement Specialist (international) with inputs PIC Technical Team, RHD/ PIC and INGO (CCDB)

A. Objectives of the Site Visit: 1. To validate some of the data gathered from the IOL and SES in the project areas affected by the proposed new SMVT ( referred to in this report as new SMVT lane or additional scope of work ) under SASEC Road Connectivity Project ( or referred to as Original Project ). 2. To gather additional information from the PIC technical team at the site the name and location (in chainage) of the Common Property Resources (CPRs) that will affected by the new SMVT lane in the Project areas, based on IOL conducted by CCDB. 3. To conduct consultation with the Committee Leaders of CPRs that will be affected by the new SMVT (i.e., schools, mosques, temple, etc.) and interview some local people affected by the new SMVT lane. 4. To see in actual the affected assets/ structures including CPRs in the project areas for the new SMVT lane.

B. Participants:

PIC Consultants: 1. Ms. Ester Felix, Senior Resettlement Specialist 2. Ms. Rahnuma Tabassum, Junior Engineer 3. Mr. Mosihur Rahman, Office Manager (SASEC Road Connectivity Project) 4. PIC Technical Team at the Site (Resident Engineers, Topographical Survey Engineer, and others):  Mr. Atul Krishna Dutta - RE  Mr. Monoranjan Sarker - Topographic Surveyor

CCDB (INGO): 1. Mr. Shaheer Ahmed, Area Manager (Tangail Part) 2. Mr. Mohan Baidya, Resettlement Orgzanizer and Surveyor (Tangail Part)

CPRs Committee Leaders (Mosques, Schools, etc. affected by the proposed new SMVT lane) and some show owners/ affected households. The names of the people interviewed and/ or participated in the consultation meetings are listed down on the last page of this Field Notes together with the pictures).

C.1: Photo Documentation with Key Highlights of the Consultation Meetings/ Site Visit on 30 in Contract WP- 01

No. Location and Key Highlights of Information Gathered Informants 1  PIC Construct. &  WP-01 has only 2 common property resources (CPRs) that Supervision Team and will be affected by the new SMVT lane and additional Contractor structures proposed in the project. It includes the following: -WP-01: 2 (male)  Mosque - 1 (i) Mr. Kozi Khokan -  NGO - 1 Safety Officer Total: 2 (ii) Mr. Ali Zahidm Admin  The name of the NGO is Konabari Samaj Kallyan Office Officer (Dienco Ltd). (Used as Kashimpur Female Child Prison Cell)

119  The name of the the Mosque is Bymail Jame Mosque  2 CCDB Staff (male)  Assessment/ computation of the value of the affected  Engr Jashim Uddin structures/ assets is at full replacement costs. PIC Topographic  Total number of affected residential HHs in WP-01 is 15 Surveyor  Total number of business/ commercial assets affected is  3 PICs (project) - 3 36. (2 female and 1 male)

Total: 8 (2 female and 6 male)

2  Shop owners in Vogra,  They have learned about the new SMVT lane 6 months Gazipur ago from RHD/PIC/ CCDB team.  They are in favor of the proposed new SMVT lane as it will Total: 15 persons improve/ widen the road; the lane close to the shops they (refer to photos last are renting turns muddy during rainy days; very dirty and July 2018), 5 th SMR, discourage customers from buying from their shops. July 2018 (5 female  New SMVT lane will address the heavy traffic jam in Vogra and 10 male) junction where there is always bottleneck of traffic due to buses and trucks, and rickshaws on the outer late, and oftentimes they stop to pick up passengers. Total No. of people consulted: 23 (7 female or 32% and 16 male or 68%)

C.2: Photo Documentation with Key Highlights of the Consultation Meetings/ Site Visit on 30 in Contract WP- 02

No. Location and Key Highlights of Information Gathered Informants 1  PIC Construct. &  WP-02 has 8 common property resources (CPRs) affected Supervision Team by the new SMVT lane and additional structures proposed -WP-02: 4 males in the project. It includes the following:

 Mosques - 3  2 CCDB Staff (male)  NGO - 1  3 PICs (project) - 3  School - 4 (2 female and 1 male) Total: 8 (see page 1 of this  Assessment/ computation of the value of the affected report) structures/ assets is at full replacement costs. Total: 9 (2 female)  PIC Construction and Supervision for WP-02 provided the names and location of the CPRs that will be affected by the new SMVT lane and additional structures.  2 CCDB staff confirmed the names of the CPRs that will be affected and accompanied the Team during the site visit.  Pictures of the CPRs that will be affected by the nw SMVT lane were also taken (see annex of this report).  Gathered information on the CPRs’ perception on the proposed new SMVT lane, project benefits and suggestion to RHD/ government during implementation stage.

Additional Data Gathered from CCDB (2 staff):  Most common species of fruit bearing trees that will be affected are mangoes, jackfruits, banana, guava, coconuts and beetle nuts.  Most common trees/ timber that will be affected by the new SMVT and additional structures are mahogany, eucalyptus and acacia; and  Others: Bamboos  Definition of the following: Large - 20 years old up

120 Medium - 5 to 20 old Small - 1 to 5 years old Sapling - Less than 1 year old  Total number of residential HHs affected in WP-02 is 123  Total number of business/commercial assets/ structures affected is 296.

2 Gorai Ronarchala  They have learned about the project from RHD/PIC/ CCDB JameMosque 2 months ago and they support government projects (i) Mr. Mowlan Jakim including road improvement projects. Hossain, Imam  They are in favor of the government’s project as it will (ii) Mr. Apota Bhuiyan, provide long-term benefits for the people, villages/ district President of Mosque and country as a whole. Stairs of the Mosque will be Committee affected by the new SMVT lane and additional structures. (iii) Plus 5 local people/  Assessment of value was for a full or totally affected mosques attendees structure as the pillars of the mosques will be affected. (all male)  They want the value of the land and structure to be paid in full as they plan to buy a vacant land beside the existing Total: 7 males mosque, thus the space where people pray will be widened.  About 2,000 people go to the mosque to pray every Friday from about 400 to 500 villages and garment factories surrounding the area.  They learned about the SMVT lane 2 months ago from RHD/ CCDB.

3 Markasul Dawah Cadet  Concrete school will be affected. Assessment of value was Madrasah School for a full or totally affected structure as the pillars of the (located on right side of mosques will be affected. existing SASEC Road  They want the value of the land and structure to be paid in project) full.  Ensure safety of the students prior to and during the (i) 2 Teachers (1 female construction of new SMVT lane and additional structures. and 1 male

4 Tangail Cotton Mill  Old school made of concrete was constructed in 1971 Primary and High School including its concrete boundary wall due to the new SMVT in Gorai, Tangail lane and additional structures. The land is owned by the District government. Primary school is government funded but secondary school is non-government institution (teachers (i) Mr. Amzad Hossain, and staff receiving salary on a monthly payment order). School Head Master The school will construct a new structure at the corridor of (ii) 3 School Teachers impact (COI), there is still vacant land at the back side of (1 male and 3 the structure that will be affected. female)  Assessment value for the affected structures was computed at full or total replacement costs. Total: 5 (3 female and 2  Primary School has over 400 students (50% girls); male)  Secondary School has also over 400 students (50% girls)  Total number of Teachers and Staff:  Primary School - 4 (3 female and 1 male)  Secondary School - 13 (3 female and 8 male)  Staff (both levels) - 2 (both female)  Students reside in 3 to 4 villages nearby  They learned about the ne SMVT lane 3 months ago from RHD/ PIC/ CCDB.  Suggestion: Construct a foot bridge to ensure the safety of the students when crossing the road, as there are many

121 vehicles on both sides of the road.  Education Committee with the teachers are all in favor of the proposed government project as it will benefit the local people and communities nearby; will reduce traffic problem as SASEC road is a busy road; and overall will benefit the district/ country. 5 Shohagpur Government  Primary School is a 2-storey concrete building constructed Primary School located in 2009. The school compound is wide and hosts also the in Shohagpur village, High School on the other side. Only the Primary School Gorai, Mirzapur in (part where the stairs going to the 2 nd floor classrooms) and Tangail District its concrete boundary wall will be affected by the new SMVT lane and additional structures. This is a government (i) Mrs. Rina Roy, school. The High School is non-government Primary School Head  Affected structures were computed at full or total (ii) Mr. Samsuddin, replacement cost because the stairs of the primary school Assistant Teacher will be totally demolished and adjacent classroom might (iii) Ms. Sauenchita Rani also be affected as major pillars on right side will be totally Mandal, Asst. Teacher affected. They want the compensation to be paid before (AT) construction starts so that the school could construct the (iv) Ms. Sadia Akter, AT affected structures, thus ensuring the safety of the (v) Ms. Shimo Akter, AT students, parents, teachers and staff. (vi) Ms. Jannatul  They heard about the new SMVT lane 3 months ago from Ferndaus, AT RHD/ PIC/ CCDB. (vii) Ms. Sheuly Akter, AT  They support the projects of the government including the

original project scope and further road widening under the Total: 7 (6 females and SMVT lane and additional structures. The students, faculty 1 male) and staff, parents and local people/ communities will have

improved road accessibility and reduce travel time if no traffic, after the project has been completed.  Total number of students:  Primary School - over 450 (50% girls)  High School - over 1,000 (50% girls)  Total number of teachers:  Primary Level - 7 (6 female and 1 male)  Students in primary school are living in 5 villages nearby.  Suggestions: Construct a foot bridge and zebra crossing to ensure the safety of the students, parents, teachers and staff.  Classes will not be disrupted during the construction period, as they could move the students to other classrooms away from the highway and far from the noise. 6 Shohagpur Bazar Jame  Around 6 to 7 shops located along the SASEC road Mozque in Gorai, projects will be affected by the new SMVT lane and Mirzapur, Tangail additional structures.  The people renting the shops and the landowner of the (i) Mr. Faruk Sinder, shops rented out have learned about the project 2 months President of Mosque ago for RHD/PIC/CCDB. Committee  They are in favor of the proposed road widening, about 18 (ii) Mr. Mizanur Rahman, feet from the road where the shops are located. Imam, Mofti/  The mosque located behind the shops will not be affected Mowalana by the new SMVT lane and additional structures. (iii) Mr. Abdur Rahim,  Suggestion: The land owner wants full compensation of the Local Person/ Mosque land and structures that will be affected by the new SMVT Attendee lane and additional structures. (iv) Mr. Shamsur  The tenants (those renting) will transfer to another location Rahman Sikder, during the road construction period.

122 Land owner of the shops/ structures rented out. (v) Zohirul Islam, Shop owner

Total = 6 males 7 Affected Shops/  Owner of the land and shops rented out to around 5 show Households owners heard about the new SMVT lane and other (i) Mr. Lakee Hossain, structures under the existing SASEC road project 2 months Land Owner of shops from RHD/PIC/CCDB team. They are in favor of the project rented out and will support the projects implemented by their (ii) Mr. Imran, Shop government. Owner IImran Store)  The land owner would like full compensation for the assets/ (iii) Mrs. Jahura Begun, structures that will be affected, as he will use the money to Landowner and shop look for new land and construct shops for rent as it is his owner main source of income. (iv) Mr. Jahangin Alan  The shop owners will just look for a new place/ shop to rent (v) Mrs. Irin, Shop owner when construction starts. (vi) Mr. Delwa Hossain,  Affected shops include 1 saloon, a barber shop, a Shop Owner telephone/ mobile gadgets shop, and shops selling (vii) Mr. Boshir Uddin, assorted goods for households use. Shop owner (viii) Mrs. Kalpuna, Shop Owner

Total: 8 (2 female and 6 male)

Total No. of people consulted in WP -02 : 43 (15 female 35% and 28 male or 65%)

C.3: Photo Documentation with Key Highlights of the Consultation Meetings/ Site Visit on 30 in Contract WP- 03

No. Location and Key Highlights of Information Gathered Informants 1  PIC Construct. &  WP-03 has 7 common property resources (CPRs) affected Supervision Team by the new SMVT lane and additional structures proposed -WP-03: 8 males in the project. It includes the following:

 Mosques - 2  2 CCDB Staff (male)  Temple - 1  3 PICs (project) - 3  Madrasa - 1 (2 female and 1 male)  Moha Soshan (Graveyard/ Total: 13 (2 female and Cremation Ground) - 1 11 male)  School - 2 Total: 7  Assessment/ computation of the value of the affected structures/ assets is at full replacement costs.

 PIC Construction and Supervision for WP-03 provided the

names and location of the CPRs that will be affected by the

new SMVT lane and additional structures/.

 2 CCDB staff confirmed the names of the CPRs that will be affected and accompanied the Team during the site visit.  Pictures of the CPRs that will be affected by the new SMVT lane and additional structures were also taken (see annex of this report).

123  Gathered information on the CPRs’ perception on the proposed new SMVT lane and additional structures, project benefits and suggestion to RHD/ government during implementation stage.

Additional Data Gathered from CCDB (2 staff):  Most common species of fruit bearing trees that will be affected are mangoes, jackfruit, banana, guava, coconuts and beetle nuts.  Most common trees/ timber that will be affected by the new SMVT and additional structures are mahogany, eucalyptus and acacia; and  Others: Bamboos  Definition of the following: Large - 20 years old up Medium - 5 to 20 old Small - 1 to 5 years old Sapling - Less than 1 year old  Total number of residential HHs affected in WP-03 is 232  Total number of business/commercial assets/ structures affected is 255.

2 Shop owners/ affected  They heard about the new SMVT lane 2 months ago from HHs along the road RHD/PIC/Contractor and CCDB. They support government projects and will not oppose the project. Total: 10 people (4  Suggested that affected households (owners of shops, female and 6 male) homes and land) be compensated before demolishing the structures; and compensation should be higher to ensure that they will be able to construct new shops/ homes.

Total No. of people consulted in WP -03: 23 (6 female or 26% a nd 17 male 74%)

C.4: Photo Documentation with Key Highlights of the Consultation Meetings/ Site Visit on 30 in Contract WP- 04

No. Location and Key Highlights of Information Gathered Informants 1  PIC Construct. &  WP-04 has 2 common property resources (CPRs) affected by Supervision Team the new SMVT lane and additional structures proposed in the -WP-4: 8 males project. It includes the following:

 Moha Soshan (Grave/ Cremation Ground) - 2  2 CCDB Staff (male)  Assessment/ computation of the value of the affected  3 PICs (project) - 3 structures/ assets is at full replacement costs. (2 female and 1 male)  PIC Construction and Supervision for WP-03 provided the Total: 13 (2 female and names and location of the CPRs that will be affected by the 11 male) new SMVT lane and additional structures/.

 2 CCDB staff confirmed the names of the CPRs that will be

affected and accompanied the Team during the site visit.

 Pictures of the CPRs that will be affected by the new SMVT

lane and additional structures were also taken (see annex of

this report).

 Gathered information on the CPRs’ perception on the

proposed new SMVT lane and additional structures, project benefits and suggestion to RHD/ government during implementation stage.

124 Additional Data Gathered from CCDB (2 staff):  Most common species of fruit bearing trees that will be affected are mangoes, jackfruit, banana, guava, coconuts and beetle nuts.  Most common trees/ timber that will be affected by the new SMVT and additional structures are mahogany, eucalyptus and acacia; and  Others: Bamboos  Definition of the following: Large - 20 years old up Medium - 5 to 20 old Small - 1 to 5 years old Sapling - Less than 1 year old  Total number of residential HHs affected in WP-04 is 31.  Total number of business/commercial assets/ structures affected is 26. 2 Affected households  They have learned about the new SMVT lane from the (homes along the road) contractor/PIC technical team. Total: 6 (2 female and 4  They support government projects including road male) improvement and widening.  They suggested that the compensation for the land/ homes that will be affected should be in full replacement costs and at a higher value so that they could construct new homes/ structures given the high prices of construction materials. Total No. of people Consulted on WP -04: 19 (4 female or 21% and 15 male or 79%)

D.1 Location of the CPRs (in Chainage)

Contract Package WP- 01

No. Name (affected Location Chainage Total No. of CPRs Infrastructure) affected 1 Konabari Samaj Kallyan Location Name: 6+600 (R/S) 1 NGO Office (Used as Konabari Signboard; Kashimpur Female Child Mouza: Mirpur; District: Services) Gazipur 2 Bymail Jame Mosque Mouza/Location Name: 4+800 (R/S) 1 Mosque Bymail; District: Gazipur (Beside Arfan CNG Station, Bymail Bazar) Total CPRs in WP - 01 2 Prepared by PIC. Source of Location (in chainage): PIC Technical Team by Contract Package and actual site visit conducted by PICs together with CCDB staff on 30 Sept. 2018.

125 Contract Package WP-02

No. Name (affected Location Chainage Total No. of Infrastructure) CPRs affected 1 Gorai Ronarchala Jame Mouza/Location: Gorai; 25+310 (R/S) Mosque Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail 2 Misronbibi Jame Mosque Mouza/Location: Gorai; 26+080 (R/S) Upzilla: Mirzapur; 4 Mosques District: Tangail 3 Shohagpur Bazar Jame Upzilla: Mirzapur; 28+340 (R/S) Mosque District: Tangail 4 Gorai Mill Gate Jame Mouza/Location: Gorai; 27+400 (R/S) Mosque Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail 5 Tangail Cotton Mill Mouza/Location: Gorai; 27+520 (R/S) Primary & High School Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail 6 Gorai Primary & High Location: Shohagpur 28+300 (R/S) School Bazar; Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail 7 Shohagpur Government Village: Shohagpur 28+340 Primary School Mouza: Mirzapur (R/S) District: Tangail 8 Markasul Dawah Cadet Mouza/Location: Gorai; Madrasah Primary School Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail Total No. of CPRs Affected in WP -02 8 Prepared by: PIC. Source of Location (in chainage): PIC Technical Team by Contract Package and site visit conducted by PICs together with CCDB staff on 30 Sept. 2018.

Contract Package WP - 03

No. Name (affected Location Chainage Total No. of Infrasrtucture) CPRs Affected 1 Jamurki Moha Shashan Village: Jamurki, Upzilla: 44+500 (Hindu Graveyard) Mirzapur, District: Tangail (right side) 2 Gullah Boira Graveyard Village: Gullah, Upzilla: 51+950 There is only 1 Basail, District: Tangail (right side) Moha Soshan affected in WP-03 3 Kadim Dholla Faizul Ullum Village: Kadim Dholla, 40+900 1 Temple Kaomi Madrasah Upzilla: Mirzapur, (right side) District: Tangail 4 Subolla Centre Jame Upzilla: Mirzapur, 38+600 Mosque District: Tangail (right side) 5 Kurni Bazar Jame Mosque Village: Kurni, Upzilla: 37+900 Mirzapur, District: Tangail (right side) 2 Mosques 6 Tarotia Govt. Primary Upzilla: Tangail Sadar, 57+150 School District: Tangail (right side) 7 Gullah Boira Govt. Village: Gullah, Upzilla: 51+180 Primary School Basail, District: Tangail (right side) 2 Schools 8 Motora Temple Village: Motora, Upzilla: 49+700 1 Temple Basail, District: Tangail (right side) (Hindu) Prepared by PIC. Source of Location (in chainage): PIC site visit with CCDB staff on 30 Sept. 2018.

126 Contract Package WP -04

No. Name (affected Location Chainage Total No. of Household) CPRs Affected 1 Shibpur Shashan Adjacent to culvert no. 53 61+184 Mouza: Shibpur, Tangail (right side) Sadar 2 Elenga Moshajan Near Bridge No. 7 68+700 2 Moha Shoshan Cremation Ground (Palu Bridge) (left side) (Hindu Upazilla: Kalihati, District: Graveyard) Tangail Total No. of CPRs Affected 2 Prepared by PIC. Source of Location (in chainage): PIC Technical Team by Contract Package and site visit with CCDB staff on 30 Sept. 2018.

E. Pictures of some Common Property Resources (CPRs) Affected by the Project (SMVT Lane and Structures) and Consultation Meetings with the CPR’s Committee Held on 30 September 2018. Shown below are some pictures of common property resources (CPRs) that will be affected by the construction of new SMVT lane and other structures under the additional scope of work for the SASEC Road Connectivity Project, presented by work package (WP) from WP -01 to WP -04 by Location.

Name of Location Picture of Affected CPRs and Consultation Meetings with the Mosques/ CRP Schools Committee Leaders, and Other Stakeholders (in chainage)

Total No. of Affected CPRs in WP-01 = 2

1.Gorai WP-02 Ronarchal Gorai, a Jame Mirzapur, Mosque Tangail

Chainage: 25+310 (R/S)

Mosque made of concrete is 2-storey, and stairs going to the 2 nd floor will be totally affected; major pillars of the mosque will be affected as well.

Consultation by PICs with the Mosque Committee Leaders and Imam.

127 2.Markasu WP-02 l Dawah Gorai, Cadet Mirzapur, Madrasah Tangail School (right side)

Concrete 2 storey building of Madrasah School will be affected.

Tangail WP-02 Cotton Gorai, Mill Mirzapur, Primary & Tangail High Chainage: School 27+520 (R/S)

Old concrete building (Primary & High School Admin Office) and boundary wall will be affected by the new SMVT lane. Pictures above also shows the School Education Committee Officers, teachers and the PIC and CCDB consultants (taken after the consultation meeting).

Primary School structures including boundary wall along the road

will be affected by the new SMVT lane and other structures.

Shohag WP-02 Shohagpu Governme r, nt Primary Mirzapur School Tangail

Chainage:

28+340 (R/S) Shohagpur Govt. Primary School, a 2 -storey concrete building and boundary wall will be affected by the new SMVT lane.

128

Education Committee and Teachers of Shohagpur Government Primary School with the PIC and CCDB during the site visit/ consultation.

Total No. of Affected CPRs in WP -02 : 8 Shibpur WP-04 Shashan Adjacent to culvert Hindu no. 53 graveyard Shibpur, Tangail Sadar Chainage: 61+184 (right side) Elenga WP-04 Moshajan Near Cremation Bridge No. Two Hindu graveyard and cremation grounds that will be affected Ground 7 by the new SMVT lane and other structures proposed along SASEC road. (Palu Bridge) One graveyard was not taken a picture. Kalihati, Tangail Chainage: 68+700 Total No. of Affected CPRs in WP-04 = 2

Jamurki WP-03 Moha Shashan Jamurki, (Hindu Mirzapur, Graveyard Tangail /cremation Chainage: ground) 44+500 (right side)

The Hindu graveyard and cremation ground that will be

affected by the new SMVT lane and other structures.

2 WO-03 Governme Tangail nt Sadar, schools: District: Tangail

Chainage: (i) Tarotia Govt. 57+150

129 Primary (right side) Concrete boundary wall of a Govt. Primary School will be affected. School and Gullah 51+180 (right side)

and

(ii) Boira

Govt. Govt. Primary School will be totally affected by the new SMVT lane. Primary

School

Kadim WP-03 Dholla Kadim Faizul Dholla, Ullum Mirzapur, Kaomi Tangail Madrasah Chainage: 40+900 (right side)

Part of the structure owned by the Madrasah (Islam school)

will be affected by the new SMVT lane and other road structures.

Motora WP-03 Temple Motora, (Hindu Upzilla: Temple) Basail, District: Tangail

Chainage:

49+700 (right side) The Hindu graveyard that will be affected by the new SMVT

lane and other structures proposed along SASEC road.

Total No. of Affected CPRs in WP-03: 7

F. Pictures During the Consultations/ FGDs with Some Shops, Homes and Other Assets that will be Affected by the New SMVT Lane and Other Related Structures, presented by Contract Package (WP) on 30 September 2018

Contract Some Pictures of Affected Shops, Homes and Other Assets Package Presented by Work Package (WP No.)

130 WP-02

Mouza: Gorai; Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail

(near Gorai Ronarchala Jame Mosque) Shops near the Gorai Ronarchala Jame Consultation with the Mosque Committee, Mosque that will be affected by the new Gorai Ronarchala Jame Mosque and some SMVT lane. shop owners near the Mosque. Chainage:

25+310 (R/S)

Consultation with the shop owners located near the Gorai Ronarchala Jame Mosque. Shop owner along the existing road.

Concrete boundary all and Guard house of New Age Newspaper Co. Located Boundary wall and structure will along the existing road will be affected be affected by the new SMVT lane. by the new SMVT lane.

Mouza: Gorai; Upzilla: Mirzapur; District: Tangail

Chainage:

27+400

(R/S)

Some shops that will be affected by the Near Tangail 7-storey concrete commercial building new SMVT lane and other structures Cotton Mill will be affected by the new SMVT lane. proposed under additional scope of works. Primary & High School

131 Shohagpur Bazar Jame Mosque Upzilla: Mirzapur;

District: Tangail

Chainage: 28+340 (R/S) Around 5 shops in front of Shohagpur Concrete old structure at main entrance Jame Mosque will be affected by the going to Shohagpur Bazar Jame Mosque In front of new SMVT lane. will be affected by the new SMVT lane.

The owner (Mr. Mahbub Alam in green shirt) of the land/ shops rented out by the The commercial structure owned by Mr. Mahbub Pharmacy and adjacent shops during the Alam is rented out by a phamacy, hardware, consultation. Around 5 shops will be affected phone services, etc. Will be affected by the new by the new SMVT lane. This is located in SMVT lane and othet structures (located in front front of Shohagpur Bazar Jame Mosque of Shohagpur Bazar Jame Mosque).

Some structures/ homes affected by the new SMVT lane and other structures proposed for the SASEC Road Project in WP-03 Partly concrete and with galvanized iron Concrete house/commercial building made sheets in front (commercial area) will be of bricks will be affected by the new SMVT affected by the new SMVT lane. lane and other structures proposed under the project.

Boundary wall in WP - 03 will be Concrete structure will be affected by affected by the new SMVT lane. the new SMVT lane.

132

Some houses that will be affected by the A concrete commercial area (ongoing new SMVT lane and other structures. construction) will be partially affected by the proposed new SMVT lane and structures.

Some of the shops that will be affected 2-storey commercial building including 1 bt the proposed new SMVT lane. water hand pump will be affected by the proposed new SMVT lane and other structures.

Other structures that will be affected by the new SMVT lane in WP-03 includes concrete home cum shop, 1 gas station, residential homes and shops.

Some structures/ homes affected by the new SMVT lane and other structures proposed for the SASEC Residential homes and land along Boundary wall and part of the concrete Road Project in the existing road will be affected by 2-storey house will be affected by the WP-04 the new SMVT lane and other new SMVT lane and other structures. structures.

133

Additional residential homes and Commercial area/ shops that will be land along the existing road will be affected by the proposed new SMVT affected by the proposed new lane and other structures in WP-04. SMVT lane and other structures in WP-04.

Commercial area/ shops that will be Husband and wife (local residents) and affected by the proposed new one of the shop owners who will be SMVT lane and other structures in affected by the proposed new SMVT WP-04. lane and other structures in WP-04.

G. Photo Documentation: Consultation Meetings with the PIC Constructions and Supervision Technical Team and the CCDB Staff Involved in the IOL and SES for the Proposed New SMVT Lane and Other Structures at the Site by Contract Package on 30 September 2018

Contract Consultation with the PIC Technical Team and CCDB at the Site (WP) No.

134

WP-02

PIC consultants and CCDB staff consultation with the

technical team (PIC) at the site in WP-02

WP-03

PIC consultants and CCDB staff consultation with the

technical team (PIC) at the site in WP-03

135 WP-04

PIC consultants and CCDB staff consultation with the

technical team (PIC) at the site in WP-04

136

Annex 3:

List of Land Acquisition Presented by Mouza/ Upazilla (in Chainage and Acre) in Gazipur and Tangail Districts

137 Land Acquisition List Chainage: 0+000 to 25+035 District- Gazipur Acquired Acquired Sl. Name of land in 1st land in 2nd Total Upazilla J L No. No. Mouza phase phase (in acre) (in acre) (in acre) 1 Bhogra Joydevpur 45- Sheet No-1 (R.S) 0.376 0.0490 0.4250 2 Naojori Joydevpur 45- Sheet No-2 (R.S) 0.267 0.4450 0.7120 3 Itahata Joydevpur 35- Sheet No-1 (R.S) 1.407 0.0000 1.4070 4 Baimail Joydevpur 56- Sheet No-1 (R.S) 0.140 0.1900 0.3300 5 Baimail Joydevpur 56- Sheet No-2 (R.S) 0.000 0.5530 0.5530 6 Mirpur Joydevpur 51- Sheet No-1 (R.S) 1.592 0.0910 1.6830 7 Mirpur Joydevpur 51- Sheet No-2 (R.S) 0.984 0.0940 1.0780 160- Sheet No-6 8 Kouchakuri Kaliakoir (R.S) 0.615 0.1050 0.7200 160- Sheet No-3 9 Kouchakuri Kaliakoir (R.S) 0.965 0.0550 1.0200 160- Sheet No-4 10 Kouchakuri Kaliakoir (R.S) 0.455 0.0000 0.4550 11 Safipur Kaliakoir 160- (R.S) 0.592 1.5560 2.1480 154-Sheet No-4 12 Chandra Kaliakoir (R.S) 0.310 0.4300 0.7400 154- Sheet No-1 13 Chandra Kaliakoir (R.S) 2.2890 0.9400 3.2290 Baro 148- Sheet No-2 14 Kamalpur Kaliakoir (R.S) 0.2550 0.0000 0.2550 15 Dinkini Kaliakoir 149- (R.S) 1.4720 1.1360 2.6080 149- Sheet No-02 16 Haritakitala Kaliakoir (R.S) 1.5090 0.1020 1.6110 149- Sheet No-01 17 Haritakitala Kaliakoir (R.S) 0.4460 0.0000 0.4460 Uttar 18 Bakterpur Kaliakoir 145-2 (R.S) 0.1240 0.0000 0.1240 144 Sheet No-01 19 Goalbathan Kaliakoir (R.S) 1.2610 0.1144 1.3754 20 Sreefaltali Kaliakoir 139- (R.S) 0.652 0.3130 0.9650 21 Tanglabari Kaliakoir 142- (R.S) 1.165 0.6700 1.8350 22 Simultali Kaliakoir 141- Sheet No-03 (R.S) 0.312 0.0000 0.3120 23 Simultali Kaliakoir 141- Sheet No-01 (R.S) 0.187 0.0000 0.1870 24 Uttar Kaliakoir 64- (R.S) 0.6724 0.6724

138 Hizaltali 25 Sutrapur Kaliakoir 57- (R.S) 0.149 0.6400 0.7890 26 Tan Sutrapur Kaliakoir 58- (R.S) 0.7050 0.5830 1.2880 27 Uttar Gazaria Kaliakoir 61- (R.S) 4.7380 0.9980 5.7360 28 Kathalia Kaliakoir 67- Sheet No-01 (R.S) 0.1080 0.0000 0.1080 29 Uttar Dariapur Kaliakoir 60-Sheet No-02 (R.S) 0.4060 1.1054 1.5114 Total 23.481 10.8422 34.3232 Source: RHD/ PIC, October 2018.

Land Acquisition List Chainage: 25+035 to 69+300 District- Tangail Acquired Acquired Sl. Name of land in 1st land in 2nd Total (in Upazilla J L No. No. Mouza phase (in phase (in acre) acre) acre) 182- Sheet 1 Gorai Mirjapur No-04(R.S) 2.12790 1.78700 3.9149 182- Sheet No-05 2 Gorai Mirjapur (R.S) 5.79970 4.03780 9.8375 182- Sheet No-01 3 Gorai Mirjapur (R.S) 2.92930 1.74790 4.6772 4 Rahimpur Mirjapur 160- (R.S) 0.28210 0.26100 0.5431 5 Dherua Mirjapur 66- (R.S) 1.43640 0.62650 2.0629 Rashid 6 Deohata Mirjapur 68- (B.S) 0.48770 0.4877 7 Baimail Mirjapur 152- (R.S) 0.72490 0.73120 1.4561 Mir 8 Deohata Mirjapur 149- (R.S) 0.87160 1.52230 2.3939 Baor 9 Kumarjani Mirjapur 16- (S.A) 0.29500 1.53190 1.8269 Post 10 Kumary Mirjapur 102- (R.S) 2.25000 1.4034 3.6534 Dulla 11 Munsur Mirjapur 57- (R.S) 1.03250 1.1178 2.1503 12 Ichail Mirjapur 54- (R.S) 0.21000 0.1331 0.3431 13 Kurni Mirjapur 55- (R.S) 1.62500 1.7690 3.3940 14 Hatkora Mirjapur 53- (R.S) 0.1950 0.2210 0.4160 15 Suvalla Mirjapur 86- (R.S) 2.7850 3.4060 6.1910 Kadim 16 Dhalla Mirjapur 30- (R.S) 3.4930 3.6030 7.0960

139 17 Katra Mirjapur 32- (R.S) 2.3720 1.0500 3.4220 18 Garail Mirjapur 59- (R.S) 0.1790 0.0000 0.1790 19 Gurail Mirjapur 58- (R.S) 2.0635 1.0924 3.1559 20 Satiachara Basail 33- (B.S) 3.2210 1.547 4.7680 21 Pakulla Basail 20- (S.A) 4.4790 0.667 5.1460 22 Jamurki Basail 01- (S.A) 4.7320 3.933 8.6650 23 Dubail Basail 67- (S.A) 2.8645 4.7500 7.6145 Sheharatoil 24 Gouri Basail 68- (S.A) 1.0640 0.916 1.9800 25 Patkhola Basail 52- (S.A) 0.54200 1.933 2.4750 26 Baoikhola Basail 51- (R.S) 1.2910 1.4360 2.7270 27 Motra Basail 50- (R.S) 1.3610 2.6540 4.0150 28 Gullya Basail 39- (R.S) 0.2660 3.6490 3.9150 Tangail 29 Boyra Sadar 40- (S.A) 0.0000 0.7880 0.7880 30 Karatipara Basail 41- (R.S) 0.5430 1.0310 1.5740 Tangail 31 Madarjani Sadar J.L. No-287 (B.S) 0.0000 0.2470 0.2470 Tangail 32 Karatia Sadar 106- (S.A) 0.0000 0.00195 0.0020 Tangail 33 Bir Kusai Sadar 108- (S.A) 0.0000 0.0020 0.0020 Khudiramp 34 ur Basail 108- (S.A) 0.4060 1.8280 2.2340 35 Bhatkura Basail 83- (S.A) 3.9170 3.0850 7.0020 Tangail 36 Taratia Sadar 82- (S.A) 1.2270 1.0680 2.2950 Tangail 37 Jalfoi Sadar 246- (R.S) 1.1810 1.7339 2.9149 Nagar Tangail 38 Jalfoi Sadar 250- (B.S) 0.0000 0.1880 0.1880 Tangail 39 Asakpur Sadar 86- (S.A) 0.0000 0.80295 0.8030 Tangail 40 Poila Sadar 270- (B.S) 0.0000 0.5110 0.5110 Tangail 41 Saritia Sadar 90- (S.A) 0.0000 0.6272 0.6272 Tangail 42 Darun Sadar 252-(R.S) 0.0850 0.8834 0.9684 Tangail 43 Chorjana Sadar 254-(R.S) 0.0410 0.6310 0.6720

140 Bill Tangail 44 Gharinda Sadar 255- (B.S) 1.1310 1.6650 2.7960 Tangail 45 Gharinda Sadar 258- (R.S) 1.5700 1.5380 3.1080 Tangail 46 Badekaya Sadar 257- (R.S) 0.0450 1.2470 1.2920 Tangail 47 Kandila Sadar 226- (R.S) 0.0760 1.5980 1.6740 Tangail 48 Barasila Sadar 254- (R.S) 0.0470 0.6370 0.6840 Tangail 49 Shibpur Sadar 255- (R.S) 0.0400 0.5920 0.6320 Tangail 50 Magurata Sadar 213- (R.S) 0.0560 0.8430 0.8990 Tangail 51 Rabna Sadar 41- (R.S) 2.1530 1.7380 3.8910 Pach Tangail 52 Bikkramhati Sadar 216- (B.S) 0.8380 0.8300 1.6680 Tangail 53 Rosulpur Sadar 217- (B.S) 0.0000 0.3850 0.3850 54 Pauli Kalihati 153- (S.A) 0.0000 1.4137 1.4137 55 Masajan Kalihati 96- (B.S) 0.1160 0.6250 0.7410 Total 63.96440 74.55410 138.5185 Source: RHD/ PIC, October 2018.

141

Annex 5:

Indicative Budget for Compensation and Resettlement by Category of Losses

142 Annex 5: Indicative Budget for Compensation and Resettlement by Category of Losses (Based on the Report prepared/ submitted by INGO - CCDB to PIC in Sept. 2018)

Annex 5 - Table1: Indicative Compensation Budget for Land No. Category of Land Quantity in Indicative Decimals Budget (BD T) A Compensation for land (in Decimals) 1 Homes tead/ Vi ti 5479 2,944,32 0,361.20 2 Kanda (Crop Land-high) 2474 1,010,190,607.20 3 Nama /Nal (Crop Land –low) 475 122,227,38 0.00 4 Wet Land/Ditch (Doba) 35 10,468,710.00 5 Pond 74 22,133,844.00 6 Fall owL and (Khal ) 1 299,106.00 7 Commercial used(shop) 1 537,382.80 Total Compens ation for Land 8539 4,110,17 7,391.20 Source: Based on detailed budget/ calculation (see Annex 6)

Annex 5 - Table 2: Indicative Resettlement Benefits Associated with Land Compensation No. Category of Land Related Entitlements Indicative Budget (BD T) B Stampdutyandregistrationcost11%of the replacement 22,605,976 1 value to5%landowners to facilitatethem in pu rchasing a lterna tive l ands. 2 Dislocation Allowance for Agricultural Land of Tk. 200 589,800 Per d ecimal, not exce edingTk.2 0,000 3 Dislocation Allowance for homestead, commercial, 1,644,000 industrial land and common Property resources @Tk. 300 4 Dislocation Allowance of TK. 200 per decimal for 22,0 Perenn ial wate rbed, not e xce eding TK 2 0,000 00 5 10%ofCCL perdecimal as land development cost for 245,404,812 loss of homestea d, co mmercial, indus trial a nd C PR Total of Other Resettlement Benefits Related to Land 270,266,588 Source: Policy Matrix of the RP. Based on detailed budget/ calculation (see Annex 6)

Annex 5 - Table3: Indicative Budget for Structures No. CategoryofStructure Indicative Budget (in BDT)

C Compens ation for str ucture C.1 Str ucture –Res identi al : 1 Thatched Structure 40,400 2 Katcha Structure 1,398,186 3 Tin Structure 76,264,224 4 Sem i-pucca Str ucture 36,089,911 5 Pucca Structure 302,436,541 6 Boundary Wall (Thatched) 2,000 7 Boundary Wall 5'' p ucca (Brick) 6,439,221 8 Drain (Pucc a) 168,300

143 9 Foundation (Pucc a) 2,777,445 10 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) 9,063,337 11 Shiri (Pucc a) 18,100 12 Gate (Steel) 241,560 13 Bench Pucca 62,370 14 SteelTurch 540,000 15 BathRoom (Pucca) 303,696 16 Road (Brick Soli ng) 37,620 17 Gate (Tin) 2,100 18 Rcc Beam 4,206,720 19 Gate (Iron) 595,920 20 Chula (pucca) 30,800 21 Chowbacha (pucca) 19,250 22 Pucca Soli ng 303,996 23 Gr il l 52,500 24 Boundary Wall (Tin) 403,300 25 Di sp ens er Nozel 600,000 26 Water Tank 150,000 27 Safety Tank 400,000 28 Water Pump 320,000 29 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) 34,440 30 Mac hine 240,000 31 IronFence 39,000 32 PVC Piece 7,000 33 Rcc Pill ar Pucca (Small ) 630 34 Steel Chaker Plate 525 Sub-Total of Res identi al Str ucture (BDT) 443,28 9,092 C.2 Str uctur e-Commerci al : 1 Thatch ed Str ucture 392,890 2 Katcha Structure 3,730,572 3 Tin Structure 76,188,246 4 Sem i-pucca Str ucture 95,360,544 5 Pucca Structure 607,977,539 6 Boundary Wall 5'' p ucca (Brick) 1,468,863 7 Drain (Pucc a) 851,400 8 Chatal (Pucc a) 2,373,140 9 Foundation (Pucca) 11,167,700 10 Car Washing Dock (Pucca) 271,500 11 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) 6,961,050 12 Shiri (Pucc a) 628,975 13 Gate (Steel) 1,164,600 14 SteelTurch 103,680 15 Billboard (Steel) 11,614,320 16 Gate (Pucc a) 434,880 17 Rcc Beam 924,000 18 Gate (Iron) 349,180 19 Pucca Road 23,100 20 Pucca Soling 953,260

144 21 Brick Field 244,860 22 Boundary Wall (Tin) 11,650 23 Di sp ens er Nozel 2,950,000 24 Water Tank 400,000 25 Safety Tank 350,000 26 Generator 105,000 27 Water Pump 320,000 28 Rcc Pill ar Pucca (Large) 11,760 29 Machin 480,000 30 S-mil l 80,000 31 PVC Piece 26,500 32 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Small) 5,040 Sub-Total of Commercial Structure C.3 (BDT) Structure-CPR: 827,924,249 1 Tin Str ucture 1,804,980 2 Semi-pucca Structure 4,674,950 3 Pucca St ruct ure 33,827,116 4 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) 1,368,630 5 Foundation (Pucc a) 86,880 6 Boundary Wall 1 0'' p ucca (Brick) 2,580,329 7 Shiri (Pucc a) 521,280 8 Bench Pucca 69,300 9 BathRoom (Pucca) 35,150 10 Oj uKhana 94,050 11 Gate (Pucca) 264,552 12 RccBeam 719,040 13 Gate (Ir on) 339,560 14 Chowbacha (pucca) 9,933 15 Temple (Pucca) 958,800 16 Shiri (Iron) 16,800 17 Boundary Wall (Tin) 31,400 18 Water Tank 50,000 19 SafetyTank 200,000 20 Rcc Pill ar Pucca (Large) 7,980 21 Machin 80,000 22 Ir on Fence 18,000 Sub-Total of CPR Structure (BDT) 47,758,730 Total of All Structure (C.1+C.2+C.3)- BDT 1,318,972,071 Source: Based on detailed budget/ calculation (see Annex 6) Annex 5 - Table4: Indicative Resettlement Benefits related To Loss of Structures No . Cate gory of Entitlements Indi cati ve Budget (BDT) D Ot her Res ett lement Bene fits Related to Loss of Structures 1 Transfer Gr ant per sqft of aff ected res identi al 12,651,207 structures/ Commercial/community properties

145 2 Rec onst ruction Gr ant per sqft of aff ected 18,695,718 residential structures/Commercial/community properties 3 Special Ass istance for St ruct ure R esidenti al (TH) 1,802,000 and Structure (NTH) 4 Shift ing of House hold Belongings (TH) 4,515,000 Total of Res et tleme nt Benefits related to loss of 37,663,925 Structure (BDT) Source: Policy Matrix of the RP. Based on detailed budget/ calculation (see Annex 6) The affected people are entitled for compensation of affected toilets and tubewell as per policy of the resettlement plan. A total of 185 tube-wells and 169 toilet have been affected by the projectin JCTE route. Annex 5 - Table 5: Indicative Budget for Tube Wells and Toilet No. Category Indi cati ve

E Tube Wells and Toilet Budget (BD T) E.1 Tube-well : 1 Tube-well s (Hand) 910,000 2 Tube-well s (Deep) 3,030,000 3 Submersi bl e p ump 1,995,000 Sub-Total ofE.1 5,935,000 E.2 Toil et: Toil et (Katch a) 14,000 Toil et Ri ng 190,000 Toil et (Pucc a) 3,100,000 Sub-Total ofE.2 3,304,000 Total ofE.1+E .2(BDT) 9,239,000 Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6). The valuation has been calculated considering the rate, 2017 of Department of Forest Annex 5 - Table 6: Indicative Budget for Affected Treeson Private Land. SI No. Category Loss Indicative Budget (BDT) F Affected Trees on Private Land F.1 Fruit Tree 1 Big 19,365,192 2 Medium 3,841,902 3 Small 1,290,120 4 Sapling/ Plant 48,576 F.2 Timber Type of Trees 1 Big 30,390,912 2 Medium 8,779,729 3 Small 1,932,821 4 Pl ant/ Sapling 13,978 Total of Trees (F.1toF.2)- BDT 65,663,230 Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6).

146

Annex 5 - Table7: Indicative Budget for Fruits No. C Indicative Budget (BDT) a G Budgetfor Fruits t 1 Value of fruits @ 30%of timber value 7,363,737 for each grown up trees. Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6). The business enterprises have been classified as large-scale and small and medium business based on nature of business and investment. A total of9large scale business enterprises (CNG station, industry, whole sale depot, etc.) have been affected. Therefore, business loss has been calculated for 9 business enterprises, A total of 1266 small and medium size business enterprises have been affected. Compensation resettlement benefits have been calculated based on policy matrix of the RP. This refers to the Entitlement Matrix Loss item 11of the RP.

Annex 5 - Table 8: Indicative Resettlement Benefits for Loss of Business No Category of Entitlement Indicative Budget (BD T) H Reset tleme nt Benefits for Loss of Bus iness 1 An amount equivalent to three months net income 1,350,000 drawn from three years average income based onincomeTax certificate for large scale business but not exce eding BD T 150,000 2 An amount equivalent to three months net income 24,178,950 against the business operators as per census but not exce eding Tk. 2 4,000 in tota l. Total of Loss of Business (BDT) 25,528,950 Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6).

The wage labors are entitled to have resettlement benefits as per policy of the resettlement plan. The skilled (Cook, Computer Operator, Barber, Carpenter, etc) wage labors are entitled to Tk.300/day for 90 days and unskilled (sales boy/girls, waiter, etc.) wage labors are entitled toTk.250/day for 90 days. A total of 590 skilled labors and 1,682 unskilled labors are affected by the project. Table 38 presents the estimated budget for wage labors (refer to Entitlement Matrix Loss item12 of the RP).

Annex 5 – Table 9: Indicative Resettlement Benefits for Loss of wage income No. CategoryofEntitlement Indicative Budget BDT) I Loss of wage income 1 Grant to cover temporary loss of Skilled wage income at a rate of TK.300 X90days 15,930,000 2 Grant to cover temporary loss of unskilled wage income At arate of TK. 250X 90days 37,845,000

Total of Loss of Wage Income (BDT) 53,775,000 Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6).

147

Annex 5 - Table10: Other Resettlement Benefits Associated with Loss of Structure and Business No. Category of Loss Indicative Budget (BDT) J Other Resettlement Benefits Associated with Loss of Structure and Bus iness 1 One-time moving assistance of TK.5,000 for tenants. 4,565,000 2 Rental assistance for both residential and commercial 6,193,800 rented-out EPs or owner of the structure for the amount equivalent to 3 months' rent but not exceedingTk.7,500

3 Rental assistance for both residential and commercial 3,038,100 rented-in EPs for the amount equivalent to1 month rent but not exceedingTk.5,000 4 New connection assistance forUtilities 1,200,000 5 Tk.10,000/-as one-time grantin addition to other 1,444,000 compensation for male headed vulnerable households and Tk.12,000/-as one-time grantin addition to other compensation for female headed vulnerable households including disabled/handicapped/widow member family. 6 Skills Training for vulnerable households (one member Per 1,920,000 household). Cost of training not exceedingTk.10,000 forone member and Tk.5,000 per trainee for trainer NGO irrespective of the training period on each IGA. 7 BDT 25,000/-per unit grave (muslim/hindu) to cover the 3,400,000 assistance of relocation, reburial forTH/NTH. Total of Other Resettlement Benefits (BDT) 21,760,900 Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6)

The resettlement plan also recognizes some other associated costs for implementation of the land acquisition and resettlement program such as operation cost for RP implementing NGO. The cost of assisting in Land Acquisition of the RHD and cost of documentation for disbursement of compensation and resettlement benefits will be spent from the contingency as per actual budget estimate.

Annex 5 -. Table 11: Approved Budget for RP Implementation Cost (out of Compensation and Resettlement Budget)

CategoryofLoss Tobepaid by RHD Estimated, (in BDT) Budget (in Approved cost as 27,198,000.00 27,198,000.00 perRevisedDPP Source: Policy Matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/ calculation, see Annex 6)

The total indicative budget for implementation of the RP is about BDT 6,157 million (Six thousand one hundred fifty-seven million) equivalent to USD7 4.71 million (1USD=82.42BD T). Of this, land ac quisition alone will require an estima ted more than $6 6.67 milli on (89.24% of the

148 total budget) due to high value of land.

Annex 4: Table11: Indicative Summary Budget for Compensation and Resettlement No. Category of Losses Total Indicative Budget (in BDT) A Compens ation for land 4,110,17 7,391 B Other Resettlement Benefits for land 270,266,588 C Compensation for structure 1,318,972,071 D Res ett leme nt Benefits related to loss of Str ucture 37,663,925 E Compensation forTube-well and Toilet 9,239,000 F Compens ation for Trees 65,663,230 G Loss of Fruits 7,363,737 H Res ett leme nt Benefits for business loss 25,528,950 I Resettlement Benefits for wage labors 53,775,000 J Resettlement Benefits for tenants and others 21,760,900 Total (BDT) 5,920,41 0,791 Allocation for unforeseen Cost for Deputy 236,816,432 Commissioners’administrative cost, GRC cases, LA support cost, Documentation cost for disbursement of compensation and resettlement, statistical and other uncertainties 4% of the Total

GrandTotal 6,157,227,223 Source: Property valuation survey, recent development projects and policy matrix of the RP (based on detailed budget/calculation, see Annex 6).

All funds for land acquisition and resettlement will be entirely provided by the Government of Bangladesh as per Revised DPP. Details of the land acquisition and resettlement budget along with detailed cost estimated by mouza and types of land at replacement costsare in Annex 6.

149

ANNEX 6:

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Per Contract Package (WP) from WP-01 to WP-04

150

ANNEX 6.1:

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget

Contract Package (WP) 01

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 01 SASEC Road Connectivity Project Joydevpur-Chandra-Tangail-Elenga Road to a 4 Lane Highway Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 01 . No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix as per Schedule A. Loss of Title Holders: A I Land (All category) Schedule 01 306,328,356.00 A II Structures (Residential/Commercial/Industrial/Com. Schedule 02 Property) 145,706,638.88 A III Trees Schedule 03 818,389.00 A IV Loss of Standing Crops Schedule 04 - A V Loss of Pond Schedule 05 - A VI Loss of Fish Stock/Cultivation Schedule 06 - Sub-total of A: 452,853,383.88 B. Resettlement Provisions for Title and non-title holders: BI Dislocation Allowance for Agricultural and Water body Schedule 01 Land 0 BII Dislocation Allowance for Homestead, Commercial, Schedule 01 Industrial and Community Property Land 165,000.00 BIII Land Development Cost (10% of CCL) for Schedule 01 Homestead, Commercial, Industrial and Community Property Land 24,630,045.00 BIV Stamp Duty and Registration Cost, etc Schedule 10 1,684,805.96 BVII Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) Schedule 11 50,000.00 BVIII Structure Transfer Grant (STG) Schedule 12 1,340,196.96 BIX Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) Schedule 13 1,995,512.80 BX Special Assistance for Structures of Residential and Schedule 14 Squatters as Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor 382,000.00 BXI Loss of Fruits Schedule 15 130,395.90 BXII Loss of leased or mortgaged land or Pond including Schedule 01 7,200.00

151 Fish Stock BXIII Loss of Income from Commercial and Industrial Schedule 17 Premises 3,170,100.00 BXIV One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants Schedule 18 475,000.00 BXV Loss of Income (Wage earners excluding owners or Schedule 19 employers) 6,178,500.00 BXVI Loss of Income from Rented-out Structures Schedule 20 705,000.00 BXVII Loss of Income from Rented-in Structures Schedule 21 443,200.00 BXVIII Loss of Tube wells Schedule 22 1,138,000.00

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 01 SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix as per Schedule BIX Loss of Toilet Schedule 23 560,000.00 BXX Shifting of Household belonging (Title holders) Schedule 24 265,000.00 B XXI Loss of Disconnection of Utilities (Gas, Electricity, Schedule 25 Telephone, Water, sewerage etc.) for Title holders 1,005,000.00 B. XXII Vulnerable Households Grant Schedule 26 24,000.00 B. XXIII Skill Training for Vulnerable Households Schedule 27 30,000.00 Sub-total of B: 44,378,956.62 Sub-total of (A + B): 497,232,340.50 C. Others: CIV Allocation of Unforeseen Cost for Deputy Commissioners' Administrative Cost, GRC Cases, LA support Cost, Documentation cost for Disbursement of Compensation and Resettlement, Statistical and another Uncertainties @ 4% of (A + B) 19,889,293.62 Sub-total of C: 19,889,293.62 Total (A+B+C): 517,121,634.12

152 WP -01: Compensation and Resettlement benefits for the Acquisition of Land as per RV Price and RP provision. Dislocati Land on Dislocation Devlopment Allowanc Allowance for Cost (10% of e for Homestead, CCL) for Fish Quantit Additional Agricultu Commercial, Dc's Price Homestead, Stock/Culti Sl y of Dc's price Additional 20% of Dc's ral and Industrial and Category of Including Total RV of Land Commercial, vation for No land per deimal Dc's Price 200% of Dc's price to watrebod Community Land additional (Taka) Indistrial and pond per . (Decim (Taka) price (Taka) determine y land per Property land 200% (Taka) Community decimal Tk al) the RV (Taka) decimal per decimal Tk Property land 200 ( Taka). Tk 200.as 300 as per as per per approved RP approved RP approved (Taka). (Taka). RP. (Taka) A B C D E=C*D F=E*200% G=E+F H =G*20% I=H+G J=C*200 K=C*300 L=G*10% M=C*200

Homestead / 1 82,100,150.0 246,300,450.0 49,260,090.0 Viti 550.00 149,273.00 164,200,300.00 295,560,540.00 - 165,000.00 24,630,045.00 - 0 0 0 Wet Land / 2 Ditch (Doba) 26.00 83,085.00 2,160,210.00 4,320,420.00 6,480,630.00 1,296,126.00 7,776,756.00 - - - 5,200.00

3 Pond 10.00 83,085.00 830,850.00 1,661,700.00 2,492,550.00 498,510.00 2,991,060.00 - - - 2,000.00

Total 255,273,630.0 51,054,726.0 586.00 170,182,420.00 306,328,356.00 - 165,000.00 24,630,045.00 7,200.00 0 0

Replacement Value of Residential structures

RV Price per Unit Sl.No Type of Structures Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 Tin Structure sft 4,435 402 1,782,870 2 Semi-pucca Structure sft 2,511 703 1,765,233 3 Pucca Structure sft 3,669 1,471 5,397,511

4 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 300 333 99,900

5 Foundation (Pucca) sft 572 905 517,660

6 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 10,000 499 4,990,000

7 Gate (Steel) sft 473 360 170,280 8 Gate (Iron) sft 988 260 256,880 9 Pucca Soling sft 3,372 77 259,644

153 10 Griell sft 1,050 50 52,500 Sub Total A: 27,370 15,292,478 11 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 2860 50 143,000 12 Water Tank no 1 50,000 50,000 13 Safety Tank no 4 50,000 200,000 14 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 10 420 4,200 15 PVC Pice rft 100 50 5,000 Sub Total B: 402,200 Total (A+B) 15,694,678

Replacement Value of Commercial structures PV Price per Unit Sl.No Type of Structure Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 Katcha Structure sft 1,140.00 346 394,440 2 Tin Structure sft 14,674.00 402 5,898,948 3 Semi-pucca Structure sft 9,755.00 703 6,857,765 4 Pucca Structure sft 71,423.00 1,471 105,063,233

5 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 880.00 333 293,040

6 Foundation (Pucca) sft 9,200.00 905 8,326,000 7 Gate (Steel) sft 345.00 360 124,200 8 Billboard (Steel) sft 600.00 360 216,000 9 Gate (Pucca) sft 960.00 453 434,880 10 Gate (Iron) sft 927.00 260 241,020 11 Pucca Road sft 300.00 77 23,100 12 Pucca Soling sft 3,120.00 77 240,240 Sub Total A: 113,324.00 128,112,866 13 Dispenser Nozel no 2 50,000 100,000 14 Water Tank no 6 50,000 300,000 15 Safety Tank no 4 50,000 200,000

154 16 Water Pump no 3 80,000 240,000 17 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 2 420 840 18 Machin no 2 80,000 160,000 Sub Total B: 1,000,840 Total (A+B): 129,113,706

Replacement Value of Community Properties structures

Sl.No Type of Structures Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Amount (Taka)

1 Tin Structure sft 580.00 402.00 233,160.00

2 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 1,295.00 333.00 431,235.00

3 Gate (Iron) sft 320.00 260.00 83,200.00 Sub Total A : 2,195 747,595 4 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 628 50 31,400 5 Safety Tank no 2 50,000 100,000 6 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 3 420 1,260 7 Iron Fence rft 360 50 18,000 150,660 Sub Total B: 898,255 Total ( A+B)

155 Schedule: 03

Loss of Fruit Trees Sl. No Type of Tree Fruit Rate Amount Tk. A B C D E=C*D

Large 1 65 5,489 356,785

Medium 2 12 3,499 41,988

Small 3 23 1,560 35,880

Plant 96 4 - -

Sub Total A 100 434,653

Loss of Timber Trees

Sl. No Type of Tree Timber Rate Amount Tk. A B C D E=C*D

Large 36 8,928 1 321,408

Medium 4 4,997 2 19,988

Small 20 2,117 3 42,340

Plant 4 - 58 -

Sub Total b 60 383,736

Total A+B 160 818,389

Schedule :10

156

Budget for Stamp Duty, Registration Cost etc. 11% as Stamp Duty, Total RV of Land 5% of RV Price Total Amount Sl. No Registration (Taka) (Taka) (Taka) Cost on 10% of RV price (Taka) A B C=B*5% D=C*11% E

1 306,328,356.00 15,316,417.80 1,684,805.96 1,684,805.96

Total 1,684,805.96

Schedule: 11 Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) RV Price per Total Amount Sl. No. Partuculars Unit Quantity Unit (Taka) (Taka)

1 Grave no 2 25,000.00 50,000.00

Total 2 50,000.00

Schedule: 12

Structure Transfer Grant (STG) for Residential and Community Properties

As per Approved Total SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity RP Rate Per sft. Amount (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 29,565.28 7 206,956.96 Sub Total A: 29,565.28 206,956.96

157

Structure Transfer Grant ( STG) for Commercial As per Approved Total SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity RP Rate Per sft. Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 Structures sft 113,324.00 10 1,133,240.00 Sub Total B: 113,324.00 1,133,240.00

Total (A+B): 142,889.28 1,340,196.96

Schedule: 13 Structure Reconstruction Grant(SRG) for Residential and Community Properties

As per Approved Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity RP Rate Per sft. (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 29,565.28 10 295,652.80

Sub Total A: 29,565.28 295,652.80

158 Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) for Commercial

As per Approved Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity RP Rate Per (Taka) sft.(Taka)

1 Structures sft 113,324.00 15 1,699,860.00

Sub Total B: 1,699,860.00 113,324.00 Total (A+B): 142,889.28 1,995,512.80

Schedule: 14

Special Assistance for Structures Title (Residential) and Without title as Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor As per Approved RP Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate (Taka) (Taka)

1 Female Headed no 1 12,000.00 12,000.00 Male Headed Income 4 no 37 6000 or Less 10,000.00 370,000.00

Total 38 382,000.00

Schedule: 15 Loss of Fruits

Value of Fruit As per Approved Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Bearing Trees RP Rate (taka) (Taka) (Taka)

1 Fruits Loss 30% 434,653.00 130,395.90

Total 130,395.90

159 Schedule: 17 Loss of Business

30% of Monthly Income as 3 Months Net Income Business Losses Sl. No. Monthly Income Quantity of EP's Net Income (As per RP) Not Exceeding 24,000 (Taka) (Taka) (As per RP) (Taka)

A B C D = 30% of B E = D * 3 F = E * C

1 1 6,300 6,300 7,000.00 2,100

1 9,000 9,000 2 10,000.00 3,000

1 10,800 10,800 3 12,000.00 3,600

4 1 11,700 11,700 13,000.00 3,900

4 13,500 54,000 5 15,000.00 4,500

2 15,300 30,600 6 17,000.00 5,100

7 5 16,200 81,000 18,000.00 5,400

26 18,000 468,000 8 20,000.00 6,000

7 19,800 138,600 9 22,000.00 6,600

10 1 21,600 21,600 24,000.00 7,200

9 22,500 202,500 11 25,000.00 7,500

1 24,000 24,000 12 28,000.00 8,400

13 8 24,000 192,000 30,000.00 9,000

1 24,000 24,000 14 35,000.00 10,500

15 24,000 360,000 15 40,000.00 12,000

160

16 2 24,000 48,000 50,000.00 15,000 60,000.00

1 24,000 24,000 18,000 17 30% of Monthly Income as 3 Months Net Income Business Losses Sl. No. Monthly Income Quantity of EP's Net Income (As per RP) Not Exceeding 24,000 (As (Taka) (Taka) per RP) (Taka) 18 70,000.00 1

19 3 24,000 72,000 80,000.00 24,000

4 24,000 96,000 20 100,000.00 30,000

1 24,000 24,000 21 150,000.00 45,000

22 1 24,000 24,000 200,000.00 60,000

1 24,000 24,000 23 1,000,000.00 300,000 1,970,100 Sub Total A: 97

Loss of Income as per TIN Holders

Quantity of 3 Months Net Income Not Exceeding Sl. No. Monthly Income Total Business Losses EP's 150,000 (As per RP)

A B C D = B * 3 E = D * C 1 50,000 1 150,000 150,000 2 60,000 2 150,000 300,000 3 70,000 4 150,000 600,000 4 80,000 1 150,000 150,000 Sub Total B: 8 1,200,000 Total (A+B): 105 3,170,100

161 Schedule: 18

One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants (Title and Without title)

As per Approved RP Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per no (Taka)

1 Person no 95 5,000.00 475,000.00 Total 95 475,000.00

Schedule :19 As per Approved RP Total Amount Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate Per nos days (Taka) (Taka) (Tk.) 1 Skilled no 300.00 90 27,000.00 73 1,971,000.00 2 Unskilled no 250.00 90 22,500.00 187 4,207,500.00 Total 260 6,178,500.00

162 Schedule :20 Loss of Income from Rented-out Structures (Title and Non- Title) 3 Months Rent Not Exceeding Sl. No. Monthly Rent Quantity of EP's Total Amount (Taka) 7,500 As Approved RP Rate (Taka) A B C D=B*3 E=D*C 1 1,000.00 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 2 2,000.00 2 6,000.00 12,000.00 3 3,000.00 3 7,500.00 22,500.00 4 3,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 5 4,000.00 13 7,500.00 97,500.00 6 4,200.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 7 4,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 8 5,000.00 5 7,500.00 37,500.00 9 5,500.00 3 7,500.00 22,500.00 10 5,700.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 11 5,750.00 8 7,500.00 60,000.00 12 6,000.00 22 7,500.00 165,000.00 13 6,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 14 7,000.00 3 7,500.00 22,500.00 15 7,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 16 8,000.00 9 7,500.00 67,500.00 17 9,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 18 9,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 19 10,000.00 9 7,500.00 67,500.00 20 11,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 21 12,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 22 15,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 23 16,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 24 18,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 25 26,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 Total 95 705,000.00

Schedule: 21

163

Loss of Income from Rented -in Structures (Title and Non - Title) Quantity of 1 Months Rent Not Exceeding Sl. No. Monthly Rent Total Amount (Taka) EP's 5000, As Approved RP Rate (Taka) A B C D=B*1 E=D*C 1 1,000.00 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 2 2,000.00 2 2,000.00 4,000.00 3 3,000.00 3 3,000.00 9,000.00 4 3,500.00 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 5 4,000.00 13 4,000.00 52,000.00 6 4,200.00 1 4,200.00 4,200.00 7 4,500.00 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 8 5,000.00 5 5,000.00 25,000.00 9 5,500.00 3 5,000.00 15,000.00 10 5,700.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 11 5,750.00 8 5,000.00 40,000.00 12 6,000.00 22 5,000.00 110,000.00 13 6,500.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 14 7,000.00 3 5,000.00 15,000.00 15 7,500.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 16 8,000.00 9 5,000.00 45,000.00 17 9,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 18 9,500.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 19 10,000.00 9 5,000.00 45,000.00 20 11,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 21 12,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 22 15,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 23 16,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 24 18,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 25 26,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Total 95 443,200.00

164 Schedule: 22 Loss of Tube -wells Private Owner (Title and Non - Title) RV Price per Unit Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity (Taka) (Taka)

1 Tube-wells (Hand) no 2 14,000.00 28,000.00

2 Tube-wells (Deep) no 2 30,000.00 60,000.00

3 Submersible pump no 10 105,000.00 1,050,000.00

14 Sub Total A: 1,138,000.00

Schedule: 23 Loss of Toilet Private Owner ( Title and Non - Title)

Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka)

1 Toilet (Katcha) no 0 2,000.00 - 2 Toilet Ring no 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 3 Toilet (Pucca) no 22 25,000.00 550,000.00 Sub Total A: 24 560,000.00

Schedule: 24 Shifting of Household belongings (Title holders)

As per Approved RP Rate Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka)

Shifting of 1 Household no 53 5,000.00 265,000.00 Belong Total 53 265,000.00

165 Schedule: 25

Loss of Disconnection of Utilities Private Owner (Gas, Electricity, Telephone, Water, sewarage etc.)

RV Price per Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Unit (Taka)

1 Electricity Connection no 78 10,000.00 780,000.00

2 Gas Connection no 9 25,000.00 225,000.00

3 Wasa Connection no 0 - -

Sub Total A: 87 1,005,000.00

Schedule: 26 Vulnerable Households (Title and Without title) As per Quantity as per Sl. No. Particulars Unit Approved RP joint verification Total Amount (Taka) Rate (Taka) by PAVC

1 Female Headed no 2 24,000.00 12,000.00 Male Headed Income 2 no 0 - 6000 or Less 10,000.00

3 Disabled no 0 - 12,000.00 Total 2 24,000.00

Schedule: 27 Skill s Training for Vulnerable Households ( Title and Without title) As per Approved RP Rate Sl. No. Quantity Unit Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 2 15,000.00 no 30,000.00 Total 30,000.00

166

Annex 6.2:

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget

Contract Package (WP) 02

167

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 02

SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References as per Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix Schedule

A. Loss of Title Holders: A I Land (All category) Schedule 01 1,028,184,771.60 A II Structures (Residential/Commercial/Industrial/Com. Schedule 02 Property) 806,960,595.00 A III Trees Schedule 03 7,553,956.00 A IV Loss of Standing Crops Schedule 04 - A V Loss of Pond Schedule 05 - A VI Loss of Fish Stock/Cultivation Schedule 06 Sub-total of A: 1,842,699,322.60 B. Resettlement Provisions for Title and non-title holders: BI Dislocation Allowance for Agricultural and Water body Land Schedule 01 69,200.00 BII Dislocation Allowance for Homestead, Commercial, Schedule 01 Industrial and Community Property Land 499,800.00 BIII Land Development Cost (10% of CCL) for Homestead, Schedule 01 Commercial, Industrial and Community Property Land 74,606,645.40 BIV Stamp Duty and Registration Cost, etc Schedule 10 5,655,016.24 BVII Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) Schedule 11 575,000.00 BVIII Structure Transfer Grant (STG) Schedule 12 6,834,802.00 BIX Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) Schedule 13 10,114,745.00 BX Special Assistance for Structures of Residential and Schedule 14 Squatters as Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor 762,000.00 BXI Loss of Fruits Schedule 15 592,890.00 BXII Loss of leased or mortgaged land or Pond including Fish Schedule 01 Stock 4,800.00 BXIII Loss of Income from Commercial and Industrial Premises Schedule 17 12,398,400.00

168 BXIV One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants Schedule 18

2,355,000.00 BXV Loss of Income (Wage earners excluding owners or Schedule 19 employers) 25,938,000.00 BXVI Loss of Income from Rented-out Structures Schedule 20 3,241,500.00 BXVII Loss of Income from Rented-in Structures Schedule 21 1,593,300.00 BXVIII Loss of Tubewells Schedule 22 1,486,000.00

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 02 SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References as per Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix Schedule BIX Loss of Toilet Schedule 23 862,000.00 BXX Shifting of Household belonging (Title holders) Schedule 24 1,915,000.00 B XXI Loss of Disconnection of Utilities (Gas, Electricity, Schedule 25 Telephone, Water, sewerage etc.) for Title holders 70,000.00 B. XXII Vulnerable Households Grant Schedule 26 762,000.00 B. XXIII Skill Training for Vulnerable Households Schedule 27 1,020,000.00 Sub-total of B : 151,356,098.64 Sub-total of (A + B): 1,994,055,421.24 C. Others: CIV Allocation of Unforeseen Cost for Deputy Commissioners' Administrative Cost, GRC Cases, LA support Cost, Documentation cost for Disbursement of Compensation and Resettlement, Statistical and another Uncertainties @ 4% of (A + B) 79,762,216.85 Sub-total of C: 79,762,216.85 Total (A+B+C): 2,073,817,638.09

169 Schedule: 01 Compensation and Resettlement benefits for the Acquisition of Land as per RV Price and RP provision. Dislocation Allowance for Land Dislocation Homestead, Development Allowance for Additional Commercial, Cost (10% of CCL) Agricultural Fish Dc's Price 20% of Dc's Industrial for Homestead, Sl Quantity Dc's price Additional and waterbed Stock/Cultivati Category of Including price to Total RV of and Commercial, No of land per deimal Dc's Price 200% of Dc's land per on for pond Land additional determine Land (Taka) Community Indistrial and . (Decimal) (Taka) price (Taka) decimal Tk per decimal Tk 200% (Taka) the RV Property Community 200.as per 200 (Taka). (Taka) land per Property land as approved RP. decimal Tk per approved RP (Taka) 300 as per (Taka). approved RP (Taka). A B C D E=C*D F=E*200% G=E+F H =G*20% I=H+G J=C*200 K=C*300 L=G*10% M=C*200

1 Homestead/Vi 149,273.0 248,688,81 74,606,645.40 1,666.00 497,377,636 746,066,454 149,213,291 895,279,745 - 499,800.00 - ti 0 8 Kanda (Crop 2 Land -high) 243.00 113,423.00 27,561,789 55,123,578 82,685,367 16,537,073 99,222,440 48,600 - - - Nama/Nal

3 (Crop Land – 103.00 71,478.00 7,362,234 14,724,468 22,086,702 4,417,340 26,504,042 20,600 low)

4 Pond 24.00 83,085.00 1,994,040 3,988,080 5,982,120 1,196,424 7,178,544 - - - 4,800.00

Total 1,028,184,77 2,036.00 571,213,762 856,820,643 171,364,129 69,200 499,800 74,606,645 4,800 2

Schedule: 02

Replacement Value of Residential structures

Sl.No Type of Structures Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Katcha Structure sft 1,826 346 631,796 2 Tin Structure sft 56,791 402 22,829,982 3 Semi-pucca Structure sft 22,910 703 16,105,730 4 Pucca Structure sft 143,529 1,471 211,131,159 5 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 6,685 333 2,226,105 6 Drain (Pucca) sft 60 495 29,700 7 Foundation (Pucca) sft 425 905 384,625

170 8 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 5,847 499 2,917,653 9 Gate (Steel) sft 198 360 71,280 10 Bath Room (Pucca) sft 180 703 126,540 11 Road (Brick Soling) sft 280 33 9,240 12 Gate (Tin) sft 42 50 2,100 13 Rcc Beam sft 1,547 420 649,740 14 Gate (Iron) sft 858 260 223,080 15 Chowbacha (pucca) sft 150 77 11,550 16 Pucca Soling sft 494 77 38,038 Sub Total A: 241,822 257,388,318 17 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 1390 50 69,500 18 Water Tank no 1 50,000 50,000 19 Safety Tank no 3 50,000 150,000 20 Water Pump no 1 80,000 80,000 21 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 52 420 21,840 22 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Small) no 3 210 630 23 Steel Chaker Plate no 1 525 525 Sub Total B: 372,495 Total (A+B) 257,760,813

171

Replacement Value of Commercial Sstructures Sl. Type of Structure Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit Total Amount No 1 Katcha Structure sft 6,850.00 346 2,370,100 2 Tin Structure sft 95,217.00 402 38,277,234 3 Semi-pucca Structure sft 74,127.00 703 52,111,281 4 Pucca Structure sft 275,776.00 1,471 405,666,496 5 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 1,336.00 333 444,888 6 Drain (Pucca) sft 1,720.00 495 851,400 7 Chatal (Pucca) sft 14,640.00 77 1,127,280 8 Foundation (Pucca) sft 2,024.00 905 1,831,720 9 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 12,900.00 499 6,437,100 10 Shiri (Pucca) sft 695.00 905 628,975 11 Gate (Steel) sft 70.00 360 25,200 12 Steel Turch sft 288.00 360 103,680 13 Billboard (Steel) sft 1,762.00 360 634,320 14 Gate (Iron) sft 416.00 260 108,160 15 Pucca Soling sft 3,038.00 77 233,926 16 Brick Field sft 180.00 77 13,860 Sub Total A: 491,039.00 510,865,620 17 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 218 50 10,900 18 Dispenser Nozel no 25 50000 1,250,000 19 Water Tank no 1 50000 50,000 20 Safety Tank no 3 50000 150,000 21 Water Pump no 1 80000 80,000 22 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 17 420 7,140 23 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Small) no 24 210 5,040 Sub Total B: - 1,553,080 Total (A+B): 512,418,700 Schedule: 02

172 Replacement Value of Community Properties structures Sl.No Type of Structures Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Amount (Taka) 1 Tin Structure sft 3,730 402 1,499,460 2 Semi-pucca Structure sft 3,200 703 2,249,600 3 Pucca Structure sft 20,327 1,471 29,901,017 4 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 15 333 4,995 5 Foundation (Pucca) sft 96 905 86,880 6 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 4,600 499 2,295,400 7 Shiri (Pucca) sft 200 905 181,000 8 Bath Room (Pucca) sft 50 703 35,150 9 Oju Khana sft 100 495 49,500 10 Rcc Beam sft 240 420 100,800 11 Gate (Iron) sft 476 260 123,760 12 Shiri (Iron) sft 60 280 16,800 Sub Total A : 33,094 36,544,362 12 Water Tank no 1 50,000 50,000 13 Safety Tank no 2 50,000 100,000 14 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 16 420 6,720 15 Machin no 1 80,000 80,000 Sub Total B: 236,720 Total ( A+B) 36,781,082

173 Schedule: 03

Loss of Fruit Trees Sl. Type of Tree Fruit Rate Amount Tk. No A B C D E=C*D 1 Large 283 5,489 1,553,387 2 Medium 99 3,499 346,401 3 Small 48 1,560 74,880 4 Plant 17 96 1,632 Sub Total A 447 1,976,300

Loss of Timber Trees Sl. Type of Tree Timber Rate Amount Tk. No A B C D E=C*D 1 Large 487 8,928 4,347,936 2 Medium 226 4,997 1,129,322 3 Small 46 2,117 97,382 4 Plant 52 58 3,016 Sub Total b 811 5,577,656 Total A+B 1,258 7,553,956

Schedule :10 Budget for Stamp Duty, Registration Cost etc . 11% as Stamp Duty, Total RV of Land Sl. No 5% of RV Price (Taka) Registration Cost on Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 10% of RV price (Taka) A B C=B*5% D=C*11% E 1 1,028,184,771.60 51,409,238.58 5,655,016.24 5,655,016.24 Total 5,655,016.24

174

Schedule: 11 Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) Total Sl. No. Particulars Unit RV Price per Unit (Taka) Quantity Amount (Taka)

1 Grave no 25,000.00 23 575,000.00

Total 23 575,000.00

Schedule: 12

Structure Transfer Grant (STG) for Residential and Community Properties

As per Approved RP SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per sft. (Taka)

1 Structures sft 274,916 7 1,924,412.00 Sub Total A: 274,916 1,924,412.00

Structure Transfer Grant ( STG) for Commercial

As per Approved RP SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per sft. (Taka)

1 Structures sft 491,039 10 4,910,390.00 Sub Total B: 491,039 4,910,390.00 Total (A+B): 765,955 6,834,802.00

175

176 Schedule: 13 Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) for Residential and Community Properties

As per Approved RP Rate Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Per sft. (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 274,916 10 2,749,160.00

Sub Total A: 274,916 2,749,160.00

Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) for Commercial As per Approved RP Rate Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Per sft. (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 491,039 15 7,365,585.00

Sub Total B: 491,039 7,365,585.00

Total (A+B): 765,955 10,114,745.00

Special Assistance for Structures Title (Residential) and Without title as Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity As per Approved RP Rate (Taka) (Taka)

1 Female Headed no 41 12,000.00 492,000.00 Male Headed Income 4 no 27 10,000.00 6000 or Less 270,000.00

Total 68 762,000.00

177

Schedule: 15 Loss of Fruits As per Approved RP Value of Fruit Bearing Sl. No. Particulars Unit Total Amount (Taka) Rate (taka) Trees (Taka)

1 Fruits Loss 30% 1,976,300.00 592,890.00

Total 592,890.00

Schedule: 17 Loss of Business 30% of Monthly Income 3 Months Net Income Not Business Losses Sl. No. Monthly Income Quantity of EP's as Net Income (As per Exceeding 24,000 (As per RP) (Taka) RP) (Taka) (Taka) A B C D = 30% of B E = D * 3 F = E * C

1 1 600 2,000.00 1,800 1,800

1 900 2 3,000.00 2,700 2,700

2 1,800 3 6,000.00 5,400 10,800

4 3 2,100 7,000.00 6,300 18,900

1 2,400 5 8,000.00 7,200 7,200

1 2,700 6 9,000.00 8,100 8,100

7 20 3,000 10,000.00 9,000 180,000

3 3,600 10,800 8 12,000.00 32,400

3 4,200 12,600 9 14,000.00 37,800

178

19 4,500 13,500 10 15,000.00 256,500

6 5,100 15,300 11 17,000.00 91,800 12 18,000.00 183 5,400 16,200 2,964,600

1 5,700 17,100 13 19,000.00 17,100 14 20,000.00 111 6,000 18,000 1,998,000

2 6,600 19,800 15 22,000.00 39,600

3 7,200 21,600 16 24,000.00 64,800

39 7,500 22,500 17 25,000.00 877,500

2 7,800 23,400 18 26,000.00 46,800

1 8,100 24,000 19 27,000.00 24,000

2 8,400 24,000 20 28,000.00 48,000 21 30,000.00 81 9,000 24,000 1,944,000

1 9,600 24,000 22 32,000.00 24,000

13 10,500 24,000 23 35,000.00 312,000 30% of Monthly Income 3 Months Net Income Not Business Losses Sl. No. Monthly Income Quantity of EP's as Net Income (As per Exceeding 24,000 (As per RP) (Taka) RP) (Taka) (Taka)

1 11,400 24,000 24 38,000.00 24,000

30 12,000 24,000 25 40,000.00 720,000

6 13,500 24,000 26 45,000.00 144,000

1 14,400 24,000 27 48,000.00 24,000 28 50,000.00 29 15,000 24,000

179 696,000

1 16,500 24,000 29 55,000.00 24,000

12 18,000 24,000 30 60,000.00 288,000

2 19,500 24,000 31 65,000.00 48,000

5 21,000 24,000 32 70,000.00 120,000

1 21,600 24,000 33 72,000.00 24,000

13 24,000 24,000 34 80,000.00 312,000

3 27,000 24,000 35 90,000.00 72,000

6 30,000 24,000 36 100,000.00 144,000

4 45,000 24,000 37 150,000.00 96,000

5 54,000 24,000 38 180,000.00 120,000

8 60,000 24,000 39 200,000.00 192,000

40 2 75,000 24,000 250,000.00 48,000

1 90,000 24,000 41 300,000.00 24,000

1 100,500 24,000 42 335,000.00 24,000

43 4 150,000 24,000 500,000.00 96,000 Sub Total A: 634 12,248,400

180

Loss of Income as per TIN Holders

Monthly 3 Months Net Income Not Sl. No. Quantity of EP's Total Business Losses Income Exceeding 150,000 (As per RP) A B C D = B * 3 E = D * C

1 1 150,000 150,000 200,000 Sub Total B: 1 150,000 Total (A+B): 635 12,398,400

Schedule: 18 One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants (Title and Without title) As per Approved RP Rate Per no Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka)

1 Person no 471 5,000.00 2,355,000.00

Total 471 2,355,000.00 Schedule: 19

Loss of Income Wage earners (Title and Non - Title) As per Approved RP Sl. No. Partuculars Unit Total days Amount (Taka) Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per nos (Tk.)

1 Skilled no 90 289 300.00 27,000.00 7,803,000.00

2 Unskilled no 90 806 250.00 22,500.00 18,135,000.00 Total 1095 25,938,000.00

181

Schedule: 20 Loss of Income from Rented-out Structures (Title and Non- Title)

3 Months Rent Not Exceeding 7,500 Sl. No. Monthly Rent Quantity of EP's Total Amount (Taka) As Approved RP Rate (Taka)

A B C D=B*3 E=D*C 1 500.00 2 1,500.00 3,000.00 2 700.00 2 2,100.00 4,200.00 3 1,000.00 16 3,000.00 48,000.00 4 1,200.00 2 3,600.00 7,200.00 5 1,400.00 1 4,200.00 4,200.00 6 1,500.00 14 4,500.00 63,000.00 7 1,800.00 1 5,400.00 5,400.00 8 2,000.00 94 6,000.00 564,000.00 9 2,500.00 18 7,500.00 135,000.00 10 2,800.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 11 3,000.00 112 7,500.00 840,000.00 12 3,200.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 13 3,300.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 14 3,500.00 4 7,500.00 30,000.00 15 4,000.00 53 7,500.00 397,500.00 16 4,500.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 17 5,000.00 73 7,500.00 547,500.00 18 5,200.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 19 6,000.00 5 7,500.00 37,500.00 20 6,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 21 7,000.00 13 7,500.00 97,500.00

182 22 7,500.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 23 8,000.00 21 7,500.00 157,500.00 24 9,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 25 10,000.00 11 7,500.00 82,500.00 26 12,000.00 3 7,500.00 22,500.00 27 12,600.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 28 15,000.00 6 7,500.00 45,000.00 29 16,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 30 18,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 31 20,000.00 4 7,500.00 30,000.00 32 40,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 33 50,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 Total 471 3,241,500.00

Schedule: 21 Loss of Income from Rented -in Structures (Title and Non - Title) 1 Months Rent Not Exceeding 5000, Sl. No. Monthly Rent Quantity of EP's Total Amount (Taka) As Approved RP Rate (Taka) A B C D=B*1 E=D*C 1 500.00 2 500.00 1,000.00 2 700.00 2 700.00 1,400.00 3 1,000.00 16 1,000.00 16,000.00 4 1,200.00 2 1,200.00 2,400.00 5 1,400.00 1 1,400.00 1,400.00 6 1,500.00 14 1,500.00 21,000.00 7 1,800.00 1 1,800.00 1,800.00 8 2,000.00 94 2,000.00 188,000.00 9 2,500.00 18 2,500.00 45,000.00 10 2,800.00 1 2,800.00 2,800.00 11 3,000.00 112 3,000.00 336,000.00

183 12 3,200.00 1 3,200.00 3,200.00 13 3,300.00 1 3,300.00 3,300.00 14 3,500.00 4 3,500.00 14,000.00 15 4,000.00 53 4,000.00 212,000.00 16 4,500.00 2 4,500.00 9,000.00 17 5,000.00 73 5,000.00 365,000.00 18 5,200.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 19 6,000.00 5 5,000.00 25,000.00 20 6,500.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 21 7,000.00 13 5,000.00 65,000.00 22 7,500.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 23 8,000.00 21 5,000.00 105,000.00 24 9,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 25 10,000.00 11 5,000.00 55,000.00 26 12,000.00 3 5,000.00 15,000.00 27 12,600.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 28 15,000.00 6 5,000.00 30,000.00 29 16,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 30 18,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 31 20,000.00 4 5,000.00 20,000.00 32 40,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 33 50,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Total 471 1,593,300.00

Schedule: 22 Loss of Tube -wells Private Owner (Title and Non - Title) RV Price per Unit Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity (Taka) (Taka)

1 Tube-wells (Hand) no 14 14,000.00 196,000.00

2 Tube-wells (Deep) no 15 30,000.00 450,000.00

3 Submersible pump no 8 105,000.00 840,000.00 Sub Total A: 37 1,486,000.00

184

Schedule: 23 Loss of Toilet Private Owner ( Title and Non - Title) RV Price per Unit Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 Toilet (Katcha) no 6 2,000.00 12,000.00 2 Toilet Ring no 5 5,000.00 25,000.00 3 Toilet (Pucca) no 33 25,000.00 825,000.00 Sub Total A: 44 862,000.00

Schedule: 24 Shifting of Household belongings (Title holders) As per Approved Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) RP Rate (Taka)

Shifting of Household 1 no 383 5,000.00 1,915,000.00 Belong

Total 383 1,915,000.00

Schedule: 25

Loss of Disconnection of Utilities Private Owner (Gas, Electricity, Telephone, Water, sewerage etc.) for

RV Price per Unit Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity (Taka) (Taka)

1 Electricity Connection no 7 10,000.00 70,000.00 2 Gas Connection no 0 25,000.00 - 3 Wasa Connection no 0 - - Sub Total A: 7 70,000.00

185

Schedule: 26 Vulnerable Households (Title and Without title) As per Approved Quantity as per joint Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit RP Rate (Taka) verification by PAVC (Taka) 1 Female Heded no 12,000.00 41 492,000.00

Male Headed Income 2 no 10,000.00 27 270,000.00 6000 or Less

3 Disabled no 12,000.00 0 - Total 68 762,000.00

Schedule: 27 Skill s Training for Vulnerable Households ( Title and Without title)

Sl. No. Quantity As per Approved RP Rate (Taka) Unit Total Amount (Taka)

1 68 15,000.00 no 1,020,000.00

Total 1,020,000.00

186

Annex 6.3:

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget

Contract Package (WP) 03

187

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget

Work Package 03

SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References as per Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix Schedule A. Loss of Title Holders: A I Land (All category) Schedule 01 2,104,599,931.20 A II Structures (Residential/ Commercial/Industrial/Com. Property) Schedule 02 338,245,665.00 A III Trees Schedule 03 38,780,999.00 A IV Loss of Standing Crops Schedule 04 - A V Loss of Pond Schedule 05 - A VI Loss of Fish Stock/Cultivation Schedule 06 - Sub-total of A: 2,481,626,595.20 B. Resettlement Provisions for Title and non-title holders:

BI Dislocation Allowance for Agricultural and Water body Land Schedule 01 345,000.00 BII Dislocation Allowance for Homestead, Commercial, Industrial and Schedule 01 Community Property Land 803,700.00 BIII Land Development Cost (10% of CCL) for Homestead, Schedule 01 Commercial, Industrial and Community Property Land 119,970,710.10 BIV Stamp Duty and Registration Cost, etc Schedule 10 11,575,299.62 BVII Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) Schedule 11 2,400,000.00 BVIII Structure Transfer Grant (STG) Schedule 12 4,050,781.00 BIX Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) Schedule 13 5,960,685.00 BX Special Assistance for Structures of Residential and Squatters as Schedule 14 Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor 560,000.00 BXI Loss of Fruits Schedule 15 4,088,238.90 BXII Loss of leased or mortgaged land or Pond including Fish Stock Schedule 01 10,000.00 BXIII Loss of Income from Commercial and Industrial Premises Schedule 17 9,167,850.00 BXIV One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants Schedule 18 1,600,000.00

188 BXV Loss of Income (Wage earners excluding owners or employers) Schedule 19 20,542,500.00 BXVI Loss of Income from Rented-out Structures Schedule 20 2,059,800.00 BXVII Loss of Income from Rented-in Structures Schedule 21 909,100.00 BXVIII Loss of Tubewells Schedule 22 2,917,000.00 BIX Loss of Toilet Schedule 23 1,532,000.00 BXX Shifting of Household belonging (Title holders) Schedule 24 2,045,000.00 Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 03 SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References as per Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix Schedule B XXI Loss of Disconnection of Utilities (Gas, Electricity, Telephone, Schedule 25 Water, sewarage etc.) for Title holders 115,000.00 B. XXII Vulnerable Households Grant Schedule 26 560,000.00 B. XXIII Skills Training for Vulnerable Households Schedule 27 735,000.00 Sub-total of B: 191,947,664.62 Sub-total of (A + B): 2,673,574,259.82 C. Others: CIV Allocation of Unforeseen Cost for Deputy Commissioners' Administrative Cost, GRC Cases, LA support Cost, Documentation cost for Disbursement of Compensation and Resettlement, Statistical and another Uncertainties @ 4% of (A + B) 106,942,970.39 Sub-total of C: 106,942,970.39 Total (A+B+C): 2,780,517,230.21

Schedule: 01 Compensation and Resettlement benefits for the Acquisition of Land as per RV Price and RP provision.

189 Dislocation Dislocation Land Allowance Allowance for Development for Homestead, Cost (10% of Quantit Additional Agricultural Commercial, CCL) for Fish Dc's Dc's Price Sl y of Additional 20% of Dc's and Industrial and Homestead, Stock/Cultivati Category of price per Including Total RV of No land Dc's Price 200% of Dc's price to watrebody Community Commercial, on for pond Land deimal additional Land (Taka) . (Decima price (Taka) determine land per Property land Indistrial and per decimal Tk (Taka) 200% (Taka) l) the RV (Taka) decimal Tk per decimal Tk Community 200 (Taka). 200.as per 300 as per Property land as approved approved RP per approved RP RP. (Taka) (Taka). (Taka).

A B C D E=C*D F=E*200% G=E+F H =G*20% I=H+G J=C*200 K=C*300 L=G*10% M=C*200 Homestead/Vi

1 ti 149,273.0 399,753,094.0 1,199,259,282.0 239,851,856.4 1,439,111,138.4 2,678.00 799,506,188.00 - 803,400.00 119,925,928.20 - 0 0 0 0 0 Kanda (Crop

2 Land-high) 113,423.0 154,822,395.0 1,365.00 309,644,790.00 464,467,185.00 92,893,437.00 557,360,622.00 273,000.00 - - - 0 0 Nama/Nal

3 (Crop Land – 360.00 71,478.00 25,732,080.00 51,464,160.00 77,196,240.00 15,439,248.00 92,635,488.00 72,000.00 - - low) Wet

4 Land/Ditch 9.00 83,085.00 747,765.00 1,495,530.00 2,243,295.00 448,659.00 2,691,954.00 - 1,800.00 (Doba) Pond 5 40.00 83,085.00 3,323,400.00 6,646,800.00 9,970,200.00 1,994,040.00 11,964,240.00 8,000.00 Fallow Land 6 (Khal) 1.00 83,085.00 83,085.00 166,170.00 249,255.00 49,851.00 299,106.00 200.00 Commercial

7 used (shop) 149,273.0 1.00 149,273.00 298,546.00 447,819.00 89,563.80 537,382.80 - 300.00 44,781.90 0

Total 1,169,222,184.0 1,753,833,276.0 350,766,655.2 2,104,599,931.2 4,454.00 345,000.00 803,700.00 119,970,710.10 10,000.00 0 0 0 0

190 Schedule: 02 Replacement Value of Residential structures Sl. No Type of Structure Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Thatched Structure sft 80 202 16,160 2 Katcha Structure sft 2015 346 697,190 3 Tin Structure sft 111730 402 44,915,460 4 Semi-pucca Structure sft 24654 703 17,331,762 5 Pucca Structure sft 52873 1471 77,776,183 6 Boundary Wall (Thatched) sft 40 50 2,000 7 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 11122 333 3,703,626 8 Drain (Pucca) sft 240 495 118,800 9 Foundation (Pucca) sft 1388 905 1,256,140 10 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 2220 499 1,107,780 11 Steel Turch sft 1500 360 540,000 12 Bath Room (Pucca) sft 252 703 177,156 13 Road (Brick Soling) sft 860 33 28,380 14 Rcc Beam sft 8400 420 3,528,000 15 Gate (Iron) sft 446 260 115,960 16 Chowbacha (pucca) sft 100 77 7,700 17 Pucca Soling sft 82 77 6,314 Sub Total A: 218,002 151,328,611 18 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 2238 50 111,900 19 Dispenser Nozel no 12 50,000 600,000 20 Water Tank no 1 50,000 50,000 21 Safety Tank no 1 50,000 50,000 22 Water Pump no 3 80,000 240,000 Sl. No Type of Structure Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 23 Machin no 2 80,000 160,000 24 Iron Fence rft 780 50 39,000 Sub Total B: 1,250,900 Total (A+B) 152,579,511

191 Schedule: 02 Replacement Value of Commercial structures RV Price per Unit Sl. No Type of Structure Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 Thatched Structure sft 1,945.00 202 392,890 2 Katcha Structure sft 2,592.00 346 896,832 3 Tin Structure sft 71,117.00 402 28,589,034 4 Semi-pucca Structure sft 48,458.00 703 34,065,974 5 Pucca Structure sft 65,142.00 1,471 95,823,882 6 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 1,955.00 333 651,015 7 Chatal (Pucca) sft 13,480.00 77 1,037,960 8 Foundation (Pucca) sft 1,116.00 905 1,009,980 9 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 1,050.00 499 523,950 10 Gate (Steel) sft 2,820.00 360 1,015,200 11 Billboard (Steel) sft 22,300.00 360 8,028,000 12 Rcc Beam sft 2,200.00 420 924,000 13 Pucca Soling sft 6,222.00 77 479,094 14 Brick Field sft 3,000.00 77 231,000 Sub Total A: 243,397.00 173,668,811 15 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 15 50 750 16 Dispenser Nozel no 30 50,000 1,500,000 17 Water Tank no 1 50,000 50,000 Sl. No Type of Structure Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit Total Amount (Taka) 18 Generator no 1 105,000 105,000 19 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 9 420 3,780 20 Machin no 4 80,000 320,000 21 S-mill no 1 80,000 80,000 22 PVC Pice rft 530 50 26,500 Sub Total B: - 2,086,030 Total (A+B): 175,754,841

192 Schedule: 02

Replacement Value of Community Properties structures Sl. No Type of Structures Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Amount (Taka)

1 Tin Structure sft 180 402 72,360 2 Semi-pucca Structure sft 3,450 703 2,425,350 3 Pucca Structure sft 2,589 1,471 3,808,419 4 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 2,800 333 932,400 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca sft 5 (Brick) 571 499 284,929 6 Shiri (Pucca) sft 376 905 340,280 7 Bench Pucca sft 140 495 69,300 8 Oju Khana sft 90 495 44,550 9 Gate (Pucca) sft 584 453 264,552 10 Rcc Beam sft 1,352 420 567,840 11 Gate (Iron) sft 510 260 132,600 12 Chowbacha (pucca) sft 129 77 9,933 13 Temple (Pucca) sft 200 4,794 958,800 Sub Total A : 12,971 9,911,313 0 no 0 - Sub Total B: - Total (A +B) - 9,911,313

193 Schedule: 03 Loss of Fruit Trees Sl. No Type of Tree Fruit Rate Amount Tk. A B C D E=C*D 1 Large 1,896 5,489 10,407,144 2 Medium 677 3,499 2,368,823 3 Small 527 1,560 822,120 4 Plant 306 96 29,376 Sub Total A 3,406 13,627,463

Loss of Timber Trees Sl. No Type of Tree Timber Rate Amount Tk. A B C D E=C*D 1 Large 2,007 8,928 17,918,496 2 Medium 1154 4,997 5,766,538 3 Small 690 2,117 1,460,730 4 Plant 134 58 7,772 Sub Total b 3,985 25,153,536 Total A+B 7,391 38,780,999

Schedule :10 Budget for Stamp Duty, Registration Cost etc. 11% as Stamp Duty, Total RV of Land Sl. No 5% of RV Price (Taka) Registration Cost on 10% of Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) RV price (Taka)

A B C=B*5% D=C*11% E

1 105,229,996.56 11,575,299.62 2,104,599,931.20 11,575,299.62 Total 11,575,299.62

194

Schedule: 11

Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) PAVC, s Price per Unit Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka)

1 Grave no 25,000.00 96 2,400,000.00

Total 96 2,400,000.00

Schedule: 12

Structure Transfer Grant (STG) for Residenttial and Community Properties

As per Approved RP SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per sft. (Taka) 1 Structures sft 230,973 7 1,616,811.00 Sub Total A: 230,973 1,616,811.00

Structure Transfer Grant ( STG) for Commercial As per Approved RP SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per sft. (Taka)

1 Structures sft 243,397 10 2,433,970.00 Sub Total B: 243,397 2,433,970.00

Total (A+B): 474,370 4,050,781.00

195

Schedule: 13

Structure Reconstruction Grant(SRG) for Residential and Community Properties

As per Approved RP Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate Per sft. (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 230,973 10 2,309,730.00

Sub Total A: 230,973 2,309,730.00

Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) for Commercial

As per Approved RP Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate Per sft. (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 243,397 15 3,650,955.00

Sub Total B: 243,397 3,650,955.00

Total (A+B): 474,370 5,960,685.00

196 Schedule: 14

Special Assistance for Structures Title (Residential) and Without title as Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor

Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity As per Approved RP Rate (Taka) Total Amount (Taka)

1 Female Headed no 35 12,000.00 420,000.00 Male Headed Income 6000 or 4 no 14 10,000.00 Less 140,000.00

Total 49 560,000.00

Schedule: 15 Loss of Fruits As per Approved RP Rate Value of Fruit Bearing Trees Sl. No. Particulars Unit Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) (Taka)

1 Fruits Loss 30% 13,627,463.00 4,088,238.90

Total 4,088,238.90

197 Schedule: 17 Loss of Business 3 Months Net Income Not Sl. Quantity of 30% of Monthly Income as Net Business Losses Monthly Income Exceeding 24,000 (As per RP) EP's Income (As per RP) (Taka) (Taka) No. (Taka) A B C D = 30% of B E = D * 3 F = E * C

1 1 600 2,000.00 1,800 1,800

1 750 2 2,500.00 2,250 2,250

3 900 3 3,000.00 2,700 8,100

4 1 1,500 5,000.00 4,500 4,500

3 2,700 5 9,000.00 8,100 24,300

14 3,000 6 10,000.00 9,000 126,000

7 2 3,600 12,000.00 10,800 21,600

29 4,500 8 15,000.00 13,500 391,500

4 5,100 9 17,000.00 15,300 61,200

10 156 5,400 18,000.00 16,200 2,527,200

111 6,000 11 20,000.00 18,000 1,998,000

1 6,600 12 22,000.00 19,800 19,800

13 1 7,200 24,000.00 21,600 21,600

64 7,500 14 25,000.00 22,500 1,440,000

1 8,100 15 27,000.00 24,000 24,000

16 1 8,400 28,000.00 24,000 24,000 17 30,000.00 47 9,000

198 24,000 1,128,000

5 10,500 18 35,000.00 24,000 120,000

19 24 12,000 40,000.00 24,000 576,000

1 13,200 20 44,000.00 24,000 24,000

12 15,000 21 50,000.00 24,000 288,000 3 Months Net Income Not Sl. Quantity of 30% of Monthly Income as Net Business Losses Monthly Income Exceeding 24,000 (As per RP) Income (As per RP) (Taka) No. EP's (Taka) (Taka)

22 3 18,000 60,000.00 24,000 72,000

2 21,000 23 70,000.00 24,000 48,000

5 30,000 24 100,000.00 24,000 120,000

25 1 33,000 110,000.00 24,000 24,000

2 37,500 26 125,000.00 24,000 48,000

1 45,000 27 150,000.00 24,000 24,000

496 Sub Total A: 9,167,850

Loss of Income as per TIN Holders

Monthly 3 Months Net Income Not Sl. No. Quantity of EP's Total Business Losses Income Exceeding 150,000 (As per RP) A B C D = B * 3 E = D * C

0 - - 0 - Sub Total B: 0 - Total (A+B): 496 9,167,850

199

Schedule: 18 One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants (Title and Without title) Sl. Particulars Unit Quantity As per Approved RP Rate Per no (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) No.

1 Person no 320 5,000.00 1,600,000.00

Total 320 1,600,000.00

Schedule :19 Loss of Income Wage earners (Title and Non - Title) As per Approved Total Amount Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit RP Rate Per nos Quantity days (Taka) (Taka) (Tk.)

1 Skilled no 90 215 300.00 27,000.00 5,805,000.00

2 Unskilled no 90 655 250.00 22,500.00 14,737,500.00 Total 870 20,542,500.00

200

Schedule: 20

Loss of Income from Rented -out Structures (Title and Non - Title) Quantity of 3 Months Rent Not Exceeding 7,500 Sl. No. Monthly Rent Total Amount (Taka) EP's As Approved RP Rate (Taka) A B C D=B*3 E=D*C 1 500.00 3 1,500.00 4,500.00 2 1,000.00 29 3,000.00 87,000.00 3 1,500.00 14 4,500.00 63,000.00 4 2,000.00 99 6,000.00 594,000.00 5 2,100.00 1 6,300.00 6,300.00 6 2,500.00 11 7,500.00 82,500.00 7 3,000.00 85 7,500.00 637,500.00 8 4,000.00 15 7,500.00 112,500.00 9 5,000.00 22 7,500.00 165,000.00 10 5,800.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 11 6,000.00 14 7,500.00 105,000.00 12 7,000.00 4 7,500.00 30,000.00 13 8,000.00 5 7,500.00 37,500.00 14 9,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 15 10,000.00 4 7,500.00 30,000.00 16 12,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 17 13,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 18 14,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 19 15,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 20 18,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 21 20,000.00 4 7,500.00 30,000.00 22 25,000.00 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 Total 320 2,059,800.00

201

Loss of Income from Rented -in Structures (Title and Non - Title) 1 Months Rent Not Exceeding Sl. No. Monthly Rent Quantity of EP's 5000, As Approved RP Rate Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) A B C D=B*1 E=D*C 1 500.00 3 500.00 1,500.00 2 1,000.00 29 1,000.00 29,000.00 3 1,500.00 14 1,500.00 21,000.00 4 2,000.00 99 2,000.00 198,000.00 5 2,100.00 1 2,100.00 2,100.00 6 2,500.00 11 2,500.00 27,500.00 7 3,000.00 85 3,000.00 255,000.00 8 4,000.00 15 4,000.00 60,000.00 9 5,000.00 22 5,000.00 110,000.00 10 5,800.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 11 6,000.00 14 5,000.00 70,000.00 12 7,000.00 4 5,000.00 20,000.00 13 8,000.00 5 5,000.00 25,000.00 14 9,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 15 10,000.00 4 5,000.00 20,000.00 16 12,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 17 13,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 18 14,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 19 15,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 20 18,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 21 20,000.00 4 5,000.00 20,000.00 22 25,000.00 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Total 320 909,100.00

202

Schedule: 22

Loss of Tube -wells Private Owner (Title and Non - Title) Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Tube-wells (Hand) no 38 14,000.00 532,000.00 2 Tube-wells (Deep) no 76 30,000.00 2,280,000.00 3 Submersible pump no 1 105,000.00 105,000.00 Sub Total A: 115 2,917,000.00

Schedule: 23 Loss of Toilet Private Owner ( Title and Non - Title) Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Toilet (Katcha) no 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 2 Toilet Ring no 21 5,000.00 105,000.00 3 Toilet (Pucca) no 57 25,000.00 1,425,000.00 Sub Total A: 79 1,532,000.00

Schedule: 24 Shifting of Household belongings (Title holders) As per Approved RP Rate Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) Shifting of Household 1 no 409 5,000.00 Belong 2,045,000.00

409 Total 2,045,000.00

203

Schedule: 25

Loss of Disconnection of Utilities Private Owner (Gas, Electricity, Telephone, Water, sewerage etc.) for

Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Electricity Connection no 9 0,000.00 90,000.00 2 Gas Connection no 1 25,000.00 25,000.00 3 Water Connection no 0 - - Sub Total A: 10 115,000.00

Schedule: 26 Skill s Training for Vulnerable Households ( Title and Without title) As per Approved RP Quantity as per joint Sl. No. Particulars Unit Total Amount (Taka) Rate (Taka) verification by RV 1 Female Headed no 12,000.00 35 420,000.00 Male Headed Income 2 no 10,000.00 14 6000 or Less 140,000.00 3 Disabled no 12,000.00 0 -

Total 49 560,000.00

Skill s Training for Vulnerable Households (Title and Without title) Sl. No. Quantity As per Approved RP Rate (Taka) Unit Total Amount (Taka) 1 49 15,000.00 No. 735,000.00 Total 735,000.00

204

Annex 6.4:

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget

Work Package (WP) 04

205

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 04

SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References as Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix per Schedule A. Loss of Title Holders: A I Land (All category) Schedule 01 671,064,332.40 A II Structures (Residential/Commercial/Industrial/Com. Property) Schedule 02 28,059,172.00 A III Trees Schedule 03 18,509,886.00 A IV Loss of Standing Crops Schedule 04 - A V Loss of Pond Schedule 05 - A VI Loss of Fish Stock/Cultivation Schedule 06 - Sub-total of A: 717,633,390.40 B. Resettlement Provisions for Title and non-title holders: BI Dislocation Allowance for Agricultural and Water body Land Schedule 01 175,600.00 BII Dislocation Allowance for Homestead, Commercial, Industrial and Schedule 01 Community Property Land 175,500.00 BIII Land Development Cost (10% of CCL) for Homestead, Commercial, Schedule 01 Industrial and Community Property Land 26,197,411.50 BIV Stamp Duty and Registration Cost, etc Schedule 10 3,690,853.83 BVII Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) Schedule 11 375,000.00 BVIII Structure Transfer Grant (STG) Schedule 12 425,427.00 BIX Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) Schedule 13 624,775.00 BX Special Assistance for Structures of Residential and Squatters as Schedule 14 Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor 98,000.00 BXI Loss of Fruits Schedule 15 2,552,212.20 BXII Loss of leased or mortgaged land or Pond including Fish Stock Schedule 01 - BXIII Loss of Income from Commercial and Industrial Premises Schedule 17 792,600.00 BXIV One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants Schedule 18 135,000.00

206

BXV Loss of Income (Wage earners excluding owners or employers) Schedule 19 1,116,000.00 BXVI Loss of Income from Rented-out Structures Schedule 20 187,500.00 BXVII Loss of Income from Rented-in Structures Schedule 21 92,500.00 BXVIII Loss of Tubewells Schedule 22 394,000.00 BIX Loss of Toilet Schedule 23 350,000.00 BXX Shifting of Household belonging (Title holders) Schedule 24 290,000.00

Summary of Compensation and Resettlement Budget Work Package 04 SI. No. Category of Losses /Heads of Compensation & References as Total Amount Taka Resettlement as per RP Entitlement Matrix per Schedule B XXI Loss of Disconnection of Utilities (Gas, Electricity, Telephone, Water, Schedule 25 sewarage etc.) for Title holders 10,000.00 B. XXII Vulnerable Households Grant Schedule 26 98,000.00 B. XXIII Skill Training for Vulnerable Households Schedule 27 135,000.00 Sub-total of B: 37,915,379.53 Sub-total of (A + B): 755,548,769.93 C. Others: CIV Allocation of Unforeseen Cost for Deputy Commissioners' Administrative Cost, GRC Cases, LA support Cost, Documentation cost for Disbursement of Compensation and Resettlement, Statistical and another Uncertainties @ 4% of (A + B) 30,221,950.80 Sub-total of C: 30,221,950.80 Total (A+B+C): 785,770,720.73

207

Schedule : 01 Compensation and Resettlement benefits for the Acquisition of Land as per RV Price and RP provision. Dislocati on Dislocation Allowanc Land Devlopment Allowance for e for Cost (10% of CCL) Homestead, Quantit Additional Agricultu for Homestead, Fish Dc's Dc's Price Commercial, Sl y of Additional 20% of Dc's ral and Commercial, Stock/Cultivati Category of price per Including Total RV of Industrial and No land Dc's Price 200% of Dc's price to watrebod Indistrial and on for pond Land deimal additional Land (Taka) Community . (Decima price (Taka) determine the y land per Community per decimal Tk (Taka) 200% (Taka) Property land per l) RV (Taka) decimal Property land as 200 (Taka). decimal Tk 300 as Tk 200.as per approved RP per approved RP per (Taka). (Taka). approved RP. (Taka) A B C D E=C*D F=E*200% G=E+F H =G*20% I=H+G J=C*200 K=C*300 L=G*10% M=C*300

Homestead / 1 149,273.0 87,324,705.0 174,649,410.0 261,974,115.0 175,500.00 Viti 585.00 52,394,823.00 314,368,938.00 - 26,197,411.50 - 0 0 0 0

Kanda (Crop 2 113,423.0 98,224,318.0 196,448,636.0 294,672,954.0 173,200.0 Land-high) 866.00 58,934,590.80 353,607,544.80 - - - 0 0 0 0 0 Nama/Nal

3 (Crop 12.00 71,478.00 857,736.00 1,715,472.00 2,573,208.00 514,641.60 3,087,849.60 2,400.00 - - - Land -low)

Total 372,813,518.0 559,220,277.0 111,844,055.4 175,600.0 175,500.00 1,463.00 671,064,332.40 26,197,411.50 - 0 0 0 0

Replacement Value of Residential structures

Sl. No Type of Structures Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Thatched Structure sft 120 202 24,240 2 Katcha Structure sft 200 346 69,200 3 Tin Structure sft 16,756 402 6,735,912 4 Semi-pucca Structure sft 1,262 703 887,186 5 Pucca Structure sft 5,528 1,471 8,131,688 6 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 1,230 333 409,590 7 Drain (Pucca) sft 40 495 19,800 8 Foundation (Pucca) sft 684 905 619,020 9 Boundary Wall 10'' pucca (Brick) sft 96 499 47,904 10 Shiri (Pucca) sft 20 905 18,100

208

11 Bench Pucca sft 126 495 62,370 12 Rcc Beam sft 69 420 28,980 13 Chula (pucca) sft 400 77 30,800 Sub Total A: 26,531 17,084,790 14 Boundary Wall (Tin) rft 1578 50 78,900 15 Rcc Pillar Pucca (Large) no 20 420 8,400 16 Machin no 1 80,000 80,000 17 PVC Pice rft 40 50 2,000 Sub Total B: 169,300 Total (A+B) 17,254,090

Schedule: 02

Replacement Value of Commercial structures Sl. No Type of Structure Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Katcha Structure sft 200.00 346 69,200 2 Tin Structure sft 8,515.00 402 3,423,030 3 Semi-pucca Structure sft 3,308.00 703 2,325,524 4 Pucca Structure sft 968.00 1,471 1,423,928 5 Boundary Wall 5'' pucca (Brick) sft 240.00 333 79,920 6 Chatal (Pucca) sft 2,700.00 77 207,900 Car Washing Dok (Pucca) sft 300.00 905 271,500 7 Billboard (Steel) sft 7,600.00 360 2,736,000 Sub Total A: 23,831.00 10,537,002 8 Dispenser Nozel no 2 50,000 100,000 Sub Total B: - 100,000 Total (A+B): 10,637,002

Schedule: 02

209

Replacement Value of Community Properties structures Sl.No Type of Structures Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Amount (Taka) 1 Pucca Structure sft 80 1,471 117,680 2 Rcc Beam sft 120 420 50,400 Sub Total A: 200 168,080 0 - - Sub Total B: - - Total ( A+B) 200.00 168,080

Schedule: 03 Loss of Fruits Sl. No Type of Tree Fruit Rate Amount Tk. A B C D E=C*D 1 Large 1,284 5,489 7,047,876 2 Medium 310 3,499 1,084,690 3 Small 229 1,560 357,240 4 Plant 183 96 17,568 Sub Total A 2,006 8,507,374

Loss of Timber Sl. No Type of Tree Timber Rate Amount Tk. A B C D E=C*D 1 Large 874 8,928 7,803,072 2 Medium 373 4,997 1,863,881 3 Small 157 2,117 332,369 4 Plant 55 58 3,190 Sub Total b 1,459 10,002,512 Total A+B 3,465 18,509,886

210

Schedule :10 Budget for Stamp Duty, Registration Cost etc. 11% as Stamp Duty, Total RV of Land Sl. No 5% of RV Price (Taka) Registration Cost on 10% Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) of RV price (Taka) A B C=B*5% D=C*11% E 1 671,064,332.40 33,553,216.62 3,690,853.83 3,690,853.83 Total 3,690,853.83

Schedule: 11 Shifting Cost for Graves (Community Properties) RV Price per Unit Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity (Taka) (Taka)

1 Grave no 25,000.00 15 375,000.00

Total 15 375,000.00 Structure Transfer Grant ( STG) for Residential and Community Properties As per Approved RP Rate Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Per sft. ( Taka) (Taka) 1 Structures sft 26,731 7 187,117.00 Sub Total A: 26,731 187,117.00

Structure Transfer Grant ( STG) for Commercial As per Approved RP Rate Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Per sft. ( Taka) (Taka) 1 Structures sft 23,831 10 238,310.00 Sub Total B: 23,831 238,310.00 Total (A+B): 50,562 425,427.00

Schedule: 13

211

Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) for Residential and Community Properties

As per Approved RP SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) Rate Per sft. (Taka)

1 Structures sft 26,731 10 267,310.00

Sub Total A: 34,631 267,310.00

Structure Reconstruction Grant (SRG) for Commercial

As per Approved RP Total Amount SI.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate Per sft. (Taka) (Taka)

1 Structures sft 23,831 15 357,465.00

Sub Total B: 23,831 357,465.00

Total (A+B): 50,562 624,775.00

212

Schedule: 14

Special Assistance for Structures Title (Residential) and Without title as Female headed, male headed disable, elderly and very poor As per Approved RP Rate Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) 1 Female Headed no 4 12,000.00 48,000.00 Male Headed 4 Income 6000 or no 5 10,000.00 50,000.00 Less Total 9 98,000.00

Schedule: 15 Loss of Fruits

As per Approved RP Rate Value of Fruit Bearing Sl. No. Particulars Unit Total Amount (Taka) (taka) Trees (Taka)

1 Fruits Loss 30% 8,507,374.00 2,552,212.20 Total 2,552,212.20

213

Schedule: 17

Loss of Business

30% of Monthly Income as 3 Months Net Income Not Business Sl. Monthly Quantity of EP's Net Income (As per RP) Exceeding 24,000 (As per Losses No. Income (Taka) RP) (Taka) (Taka) A B C D = 30% of B E = D * 3 F = E * C

1 2 9,000 10,000.00 3,000 18,000

5 16,200 2 18,000.00 5,400 81,000

11 18,000 3 20,000.00 6,000 198,000

4 1 21,600 24,000.00 7,200 21,600

4 22,500 5 25,000.00 7,500 90,000

5 24,000 6 30,000.00 9,000 120,000

7 4 24,000 40,000.00 12,000 96,000

5 24,000 8 50,000.00 15,000 120,000

1 24,000 9 100,000.00 30,000 24,000

10 1 24,000 120,000.00 36,000 24,000 Sub Total A: 39 792,600

214

Loss of Income as per TIN Holders

3 Months Net Income Not Exceeding Total Business Sl. No. Monthly Income Quantity of EP's 150,000 (As per RP) Losses A B C D = B * 3 E = D * C

0 - 0 - -

0 Sub Total B: -

Total (A+B): 39 792,600

Schedule: 18

One Time Moving Assistance for Commercial Tenants (Title and Without title) As per Approved RP Total Amount Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate Per no (Taka) (Taka)

1 Person no 27 5,000.00 135,000.00

Total 27 135,000.00

Schedule :19 Loss of Income Wage earners (Title and Non - Title) As per Approved Sl. Amount Particulars Unit RP Rate Per nos Total days Quantity Total Amount (Taka) No. (Taka) (Tk.) 1 Skilled no 300.00 90 27,000.00 13 351,000.00 2 Unskilled no 250.00 90 22,500.00 34 765,000.00 Total 47 1,116,000.00

215

Schedule: 20

Loss of Income from Rented -out Structures (Title and Non - Title) 3 Months Rent Not Exceeding 7,500 As Sl. No. Monthly Rent Quantity of EP's Total Amount (Taka) Approved RP Rate (Taka) A B C D=B*3 E=D*C 1 1,000.00 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 2 2,000.00 7 6,000.00 42,000.00 3 2,500.00 3 7,500.00 22,500.00 4 3,000.00 4 7,500.00 30,000.00 5 4,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 6 5,000.00 5 7,500.00 37,500.00 7 6,000.00 2 7,500.00 15,000.00 8 15,000.00 3 7,500.00 22,500.00 Total 27 187,500.00 Schedule: 21 Loss of Income from Rented -in Structures (Title and Non - Title) 1 Months Rent Not Exceeding 5000, As Sl. No. Monthly Rent Quantity of EP's Total Amount (Taka) Approved RP Rate (Taka) A B C D=B*1 E=D*C 1 1,000.00 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 2 2,000.00 7 2,000.00 14,000.00 3 2,500.00 3 2,500.00 7,500.00 4 3,000.00 4 3,000.00 12,000.00 5 4,000.00 2 4,000.00 8,000.00 6 5,000.00 5 5,000.00 25,000.00 7 6,000.00 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 8 15,000.00 3 5,000.00 15,000.00 Total 27 92,500.00

216

Schedule: 22 Loss of Tube -wells Private Owner (Title and Non - Title) Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) Tube-wells 1 no 11 14,000.00 154,000.00 (Hand) Tube-wells 2 no 8 30,000.00 300,000.00 (Deep) Submersible 3 no 0 105,000.00 - pump Sub Total A: 19 394,000.00

Schedule: 23 Loss of Toilet Private Owner ( Title and Non - Title) Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Toilet (Katcha) no 0 2,000.00 - 2 Toilet Ring no 10 5,000.00 50,000.00 3 Toilet (Pucca) no 12 25,000.00 300,000.00 Sub Total A: 22 350,000.00

Schedule: 24 Shifting of Household belongings (Title holders) As per Approved RP Rate Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity Total Amount (Taka) (Taka) Shifting of 1 no 58 5,000.00 290,000.00 Household Belong

Total 58 290,000.00

217

Schedule: 25

Loss of Disconnection of Utilities Private Owner (Gas, Electricity, Telephone, Water, sewerage etc.) for Sl. No. Particulars Unit Quantity RV Price per Unit (Taka) Total Amount (Taka) 1 Electricity Connection no 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 2 Gas Connection no 0 25,000.00 - 3 Water Connection no 0 - - Sub Total A: 1 10,000.00

Schedule: 26 Vulnerable Households ( Title and Without title ) As per Approved Quantity as per joint Sl. No. Particulars Unit Total Amount (Taka) RP Rate (Taka) verificat ion by PAVC 1 Female Headed no 12,000.00 4 48,000.00 Male Headed Income 2 no 10,000.00 5 50,000.00 6000 or Less 3 Disabled no 12,000.00 0 - Total 9 98,000.00

Schedule: 27 Skill Training for Vulnerable Households ( Title and Without title)

Sl. No. Quantity As per Approved RP Rate (Taka) Unit Total Amount (Taka)

1 9 15,000.00 no 135,000.00

Total 135,000.00

218

ANNEX 7:

Land Acquisition and RP Implementation Schedule

219

Annex 7: SASEC ROAD CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

Land Acquisition and RP Implementation Schedule Period in months from the start of assignment (source: INGO, Sept. 2018 Report) Sl. Activities

No.

Main activities Sub-activities 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

01. Organizational  Selection of Implementing NGO by the arrangement RHD/GOB

 Signing the contract agreement between RHD and Implementing NGO

 Finalization of over all planning of relocation and resettlement

02 Reconnaissance Visit of Project Alignment

03. Training and  Assignment of field and support staff from own mobilization of Staffs organization

 Training and orientation of field & support staff

 Establishment of site (field) office

 Staff mobilization in the site (field) offices

04 Taking over of Right of  Section wise /LA Case (LAP) wise/ District wise Way along with Project Alignment as per LAP

05. Liaison with Project  LAPs submission to DC by PD, RHD Director, RHD, Deputy Commissioner, and other  LAPs approval by DLAC authorities to expedite service of the land  Preparation and issuance of notice under Acquisition process section 4

220

Period in months from the start of assignment

Sl. Activities

No.

Main activities Sub-activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

06. Revision of  Development of format for Socio-economic survey survey/Census or verification of  Review survey Inventory of Losses, if require  Computerization of survey data

 Tabulation and Statistical information of SES data

 Categorization of EPs vulnerability

07. Updating of RP, if  Submission of necessary require information and SES data to DCSC for preparation of RP

 Submission of RP to competent authority

 Approval of final RP by the authority

08. Establish  Review the list of Project Information camp Affected Households (PAHs) and disseminate of information  Formation of group by Affected Persons (APs)

 Selection of Information Camp

 Inform Procedure of Payment

 Suggestion for preparation of legal documents

09. Preparation and  Meeting with affected Persons distribution of information  Preparation of Information

221

Period in months from the start of assignment

brochure, leaflets, brochures etc.  Distribution of brochure, leaflets, etc. to the APs

Apprising resettlement policies and EPs entitlements

Period in months from the start of assignment

Sl. Activities

No.

Main activities Sub-activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

10. Issuance of notice  Approval of LAP by M/O Land by Deputy Commissioner and  Issuance of notice under section assessment of DC’s 7 and follow up notice by APs budget (In different finding legality of individual Section and ownership and informing owners Districts) to present document

 DCs staff assesses valuation of properties as per Law

Submission of DCs compensation budget to the competent authority

Issuance of notice under section 8

11. Disbursement of  Approval of DCs compensation DC’s LA Cheque budget (CCL) to APs including Assisting  Placement of fund with DC to DCs & EPs  Assisting Payment of compensation under Law (CCL) to DCs & EPs

222

12. Collection of CCL  LA Case wise & District wise

13. Formation and  Formation and approval of Approval of PAVC Property Assessment and and GRC by Valuation Committee (PAVC) coordinating with RHD, MOC, DCs &  Formation and approval of Others Grievance Redress Committee (GRC)

14. Joint Verification  Development of format for Survey through Joint Verification survey PAVC  Joint verification survey

 Joint verification survey data authentication by PAVC

15. Market survey of  Development of format for properties through Market Survey PAVC  Market Survey of properties

 Market survey data authentication by PAVC

Sl. Activities

No .

Main activities Sub-activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

16. Development of Menu driven Software development for software for the project menu-driven Computerized Computerization of JVS & PVS data Management Information System Validation of all survey data for computerization Tabulation and statistical information of and report generation JVS data of, JVS and PV data Preparation of ID

Preparation of Rate file

223

Computerization of category wise DC compensation budget

17. Preparation of ID file Provide ID number as per category of and Insertion of ID losses number to all Entitled Persons Insertion of ID number for individual identification of EPs

Finalization of ID list

18. Reconciliation with Collection of Deputy Commissioner DCs compensation estimates budget Reconciliation of DCs estimates with JVS and MS data

19. Identification of Finalization of total losses losses and preparation of Preparation of Compensation and Compensation resettlement budget Budget covering additional and other Submission of Compensation and payments not covered resentment budget to the competent by CCL authority Approval of compensation and resettlement budget

Placement of fund with the CCDB

20. Preparation of EP Section, LA Case and District wise File & EC.

21. Distribution of ID Photographs of Entitled Persons Card to the EPs Preparation of ID Card

Distribution of ID Cards to the Entitled Persons

Period in months from the start of assignment

224

Period in months from the start of assignment

Sl. Activities

No.

Main activities Sub-activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

22. Functioning of Grievance Receipt of grievance from the aggrieved Redress Mechanism persons

Verification of the grievances

Disposal of the grievances by the Grievances Redress Committees

23 Payment of Compensation and Assisting and Preparation of Individual Resettlement Benefits including EP’s Payment Supporting Documents additional payment to the Non-title holder and Title holder Preparation of Payment Statement EPs Finalization of individual Entitlement by MIS for both Updating the payment information direct and indirect losses Facilitate the purchase of land for relocation

24. Special assistance to vulnerable Additional provision for vulnerable EPs EPs Assistance to purchase land of landless vulnerable EPs

Assist in participation of roadside plantation and forestation program by the contractor

25. Assisting Hand-over the land to Arrangement of Encumbrance free ROW contractor through RHD (Section by the Deputy Commissioner. wise & District wise) Handing over of land to contractors

26. Arrangement of training for Formation of vulnerable groups Vulnerable PAPs to improve their skill for income generation. Preparation of training manuals for vulnerable EPs

Organizing Skill training for generation of income of Vulnerable EPs

27. Reports/Information Periodic / on call report dissemination to RHD, ADB and Monthly progress report

225

concern authorities Terminal report

Internal monitoring

28. Assistance to RHD in Monitor total budgetary provision (DC & maintenance of records of the RHD) compensation and the disbursement Preserve payment voucher on the regular basis

Assistance in maintenance of records compensation disbursement

Sl. Activities No.

226

Main activities Sub-activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 29. Assisting to APs  Assist Land losers to for relocation, purchase land (to get resettlement and Stamp duty & Reg. purchasing land Cost)

30. Project Impact  Development of a Survey survey form for project impact survey

 Conduct impact survey  Computerization and tabulation of impact survey data  Report in project impact 31. Monitoring land  Field level acquisition and monitoring and all resettlement assessment of daily related activities operation of Land Acquisition and resettlement activities.

227