Report Number 16 October 1987 FEWS Country Report

Africa Bureau U.S. Agency for International Development Summary Map i

,/.!z ,Rainf all1 Through September M- <65% of 1951-80 average 30 .. 75 of 1951-80 average

/______*<80% of 1951-80 average

SHarvest prospects poor ~ZHarvest prospects good Famine Early Warning System Country Report MALI Average Harvest Expected

Prepared for the Africa Bureau of the U.S. Agency for Internaticnal Development

Prepared by Price, Williams & Associates, Inc. October 1987

Contents

Page

1 Summary 1 Vegetation Conditions 4 Rainfall 5 Agriculture List of Figures

Rgle

Inside Cover Figure 1: Summary Map 3 Figure 2: Seasonal Vegetative Trends 4 Table I: Cumulative Rainfall 6 Figure 3: 1987 Harvesi Prospects 7 Appendix: Administrative Units: Regions and Cercies SUMMARY An average harvest ih expected for Mali as a whole, although harvest prospects are poor in some regions. In , resources among agriculturalists are low because of successive poor harvests, and people will likely require assistance by the end of the year. In August, the Governor of Gao declared that an emergency situation existed, and the situation has not improved. Cumulative rainfall through September 30 at the Gao station (58 mm) was the lowest in the historic record -­ fully 41 mm below the previous low (1983). The condition of vegetation, as derived from satellite imagery, confirms that little growth occurred around the Gao station, and extends the area of concern to most of the Region. Herds in Gao began moving south earlier than normal. In Segou Region, an informal field report suggests that harvest priuapects range from none to poor, while seasonal vegetative trends, derived from satellite imagery, suggest that crop prospects will range from poor to good. A formal assessment would be needed to determine whether the harvest will be sufficient for populations in the Region. In , late rains improved harvest expectations in some areas from poor to average, although overall regional harvest prospects are below average. Elsewhere in Mali, crop prospects generally range from average to good. Indicators * At the irrigated rice scheme in Mopti (Operation Riz Mopti), only 1,000 of 18,000 hectares are expected to be harvested because of low river levels.

e Preliminary estimates of gross cereal production in Mali range between 1.2 million metric tons (MT) and 1.48 million MT. Gross cereal production averaged 1.655 MT in 1985 and 1986, which were excellent years for Mali.

VEGETATION 1 Satellite imagery suggests that vegetative vigor CONDITIONS initially increased between late May and carly June throughout the growing areas of Mali (exceptions are discussed below). A general, countrywide decline in vegetation condidons began between September 1-10 and September 11-20. This "take-off" and subsequent decline

1 The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is derived from NOAA AVHRR GAO data. The photosynthetic capacity, or vegetntive vigor displayed by these images is generally believed to be indicative condition of the of vegetation on the ground, and at least inferentially, of the growing conditions for crops and pastures. These relationships are, however, only indirect and still the subject of continuing research. in vegetative vigor closely parallels the historic (1981­ 86) averages for Mali's cercies, suggesting that the length of the growing was normal this year (see Figure 2).

Kayes Regi.on: Satellite imagery through October 10 suggests that vegetation conditions, during the growing season, ranged from good to poor. In Kenieba, Bafoulabe, and Kita Cercles (see Appendix for locations), vegeta­ tion condition,:: hroughout the growing season were generally abov. average. In , vegetative vigor did not "take off" until July 1-10, suggesting that the growing se-:,on was short. Furthermore, vegetation conditions declined rapidly after September 1-10, and crops not fully mature by that time may have been severely stressed.

Koulikoro Region: Vegetation conditions in generally ranged from average to good throughout the growing season, with a few exceptions. in southern Nara, below average conditions persisted from the beginning of August to the beginning of October, and in northern Kolokani, vegetation was less vigorous than the historic average from mid-September to the beginning of October. Elsewhere in Koulikoro province, satellite imagery suggests that vegetative vigor generally remained above the historic average throughout the season.

Sikasso Region: Imagery suggests that vegetation conditions were generally good throughout . Vegetative vigor increased steadily throughout the region from late May until early September. Vegetation conditions throughout this period were nearly always above the historic (1981-86) average, and often at the historic maximum in all cercles.

Segou Region: Except for northern and Cercles, satellite imagery suggests that vegetation conditions ranged from average to good throughout the growing season. In Niono, vegetative vigor changed little between the beginning of June and late July. In northern Tominian, vegetative vigor remained unchanged from the end of June to the end of July, and vegetation conditions were below average from mid-September to the beginning of October. Crops in Niono and northern Tominian may have been severely stressed and poor yields can be expected. In both Baraoueli and Bla Cercles, vegetative vigor was equal to the historic maximum from mid-June to mid-July and again from late August to early October, suggesting that conditions for crop development were generally good throughout the season. Imagery suggests that vegetation conditions in the other cercles 2 Seasonal Vegetat ive Trends 1987 YOUVAROU Maxiun, Average

Maximum, Minimum, and Average are derived from the 1981-86 historic May July Sept Nov record NIORO .

-O Iea May July Sept Nov -y July Sept Nov

ay uypto BARAOUEL,- I K TIA May July Sept Nov

May July Sept Nov

_ May July Sept Nov May July Sept Nov May July Sept Nov

May July Sept Nov Source: FENS/PWA. October 1987 in Segou (Segou, Macina, end San) increased rapidly early in the scason, but later followed the average vegetative trend for their respective cercles.

Mopti Region: Vegetative conditions, derived from satellite imagery, were stagnant for a month (mid-June to mid-July) in Mopti and Douentza Cercles, and nearly two months (late June to mid-August) in Bandiagara and Djenne Cercles. In Youvarou Cercle, vegetative vigor changed little since late June. Prolonged, unchanging vegetation conditions during the growing season, when increasing vegetative vigor is the norm, suggest that crops in these areas may have been severely stressed. Vegctative vigor in the remaining cercles of Mopti settled to the historic norm after a swift "take-off" early in the season.

Tombouctou and Gao Regions: Imagery of general vegetation conditions suggests that pasturelands are in poor condition. Since most areas of agricultural production rely upon irrigation, the use of satellite imagery to infer crop prospects is inappropriate.

RAINFALL Cumulative rainfall through September 30 was below the historic (1951-80) average at all reporting stations, although it was similai to last year's levels at Mopti, , and Nioro (see Table I). Recorded rainfall at the Gao station was fully 41 mm (58%) below the previous

Table 1: Cumulative Rainfall Through September 30 (mm)

% of 1951-80 % of 1951-80 Station 1987 1986 Average 1986 Average

Bougouni 825 1066 1042 77 79 Bamako 721 795 953 91 76 Kita 626 849 964 74 65 San** 514 729 672 71 76 Segou 470 679 664 69 71 418 498 645 84 65 Mopti 366 397 515 92 71 Nioro 329 246 535 134 61 Tombouctou 111 133 172 83 65 Gao 58 138 232 *42 25

Source: Direction Nationale de l'Agriculture and NOAA/NESDIS

Cumulative rainfall for San station is only through September 20.

4 low in the historic record, suggesting that even pastures in low lying areas will be unable to sustain herds much beyond the end of the rainy season.

AGRICULTURE A recent report by the Systeme d'Alerte Precoce (SAP) generally confirms the picture of yielc inferred prospects from satellite imagery and rainfall reports. Crop prospects are reported to be poor in parts of and Diema Cercles Kayes (), in Kolokani and Nara Cercles (Koulikoro Region), (Segou Region), throughout much of Mopti, and in the Tombouctou, irrigated areas in and Gao Regions (see Figure 3 and Appendix for locations). In addition, satellite imagery suggests that crop prospects are good in Kenieba and southern Bafoulabe Cerclcs (Kayes Region), in southern and western Segou Regions, and along the southeast border of Koulikoro Region. While seasonal vegetative trends indicate that harvest prospects in Segou Region will range from poor to good, an informal report from the field suggests that prospects range from total failure to poor. Informal field reports also indicate that most crops in Sikasso Region appear healthy, but maize appears stunted and low yields are expected. The Government of Mali (GOM) estimated that gross cereal production will be approximately 1.48 million metric tons (MT). This is approximately 83% of last year's record 1.78 million MT, and 90% of cereal production in 1985. Some informal reports from the field sug-est that the GOM estimate is high and that gross cereal productioi closer will be to 1.2 million MT. Satellite imagery suggests that the GOM estimate is not overly optimistic, but the if reports concerning crop prospects in Segou correct, the lower Region are cereal production estimate may be more accurate.

5 1987 Harvest Prospects \ -W

TOMBOUCTOUAg

y Below Average

LIZ Average :SIASSo

LIZ Above Average

FEWS/PWA, October 1987 Appendix: MALI

Administrative Units: Regions & Cercles

24 N 22 N 'IALGERIA

-22 N

20 N

16 N Tombouctou MAURITANIA 1 Gao

N 16

1 7 6 Koulikoro

14 N K NIE 4 SENEGAL2 5 121Seo

12 N 3 5BURKI NA 1 2 2Si~sro FASO

GUINEE . 10 N IVORY COAST

I I l l I I l l I 12 W 10 W 8W 6 W 4 W 2 W 0 2 E 4 E

REGI ONS and CKRCLES KAYES SIKASSO MPTI GAO Other Int'l 1. boundaries Kayes 1. Slkaamo 1. Moptl 1. Gao 2. Ba oulabe 2. Boulouni 2. Bandiagara 3. 2. Ansongo Dlema 3. Kad olo 3. Bankass 3. Bourem Region Boundary 4. Kenleba 4. Kolondieba 6. 4. DJenne 4. Kldal Kita 6. Koutiala 6. Douentza 6. Boundary 8. Nloro 7. 8. Yanfolila 6. Koro Yellmane 7. Yorosao 7. Tenenkou KOUL IKORO SEGOU 8. Youvarou National Capital 1. Koulikoro 1. Secou TOMBOUCTOU 0 Regional Capital 2. Banamba 2. Baraouell 1. Tombouctou 3. Diolla 3. Bla 4. Kangaba 2. Dire 4. acina 3. Goundam 200 kr 5. Kati 6. Niono 4. Gourma-Rharoun 8. Kolokani 6. San 5. Nialunke 7. Nara 7. Tominian

YEWS/PWA 1/87 This is the sixteenth in a series of monthly reports on Mali issued by the Famine Early Warning System (FEWS). It is designed to provide decisionmakers with current information and analysis on existing and potential nutrition emergenc, situations. Each situation identified is described in terms of geographical extent and the number of people involved, or at-risk, and the proximate causes insofar as they have been discerned. Use of the term "at-risk" to identify vulnerable populations is problematic since no generally agreed upon definition exists Yet, it is necessary to identify or "target" populatio;s in-need or "at-risk" in order to determine appropriate forms and levels of intervention. Thus for the present, until a better usage can be found, FEWS reports will employ the term "at-risk" to mean... .. those persons lacking iufficient food, or resources to acquire sufficient food, to avert a nutritional crisis (i.e., a progressive deterioration in their health or nutritional condition below the status quo), and who, a.- a result, require specific intervention to avoid a life-threatening situation. Perhaps of most importance to decisionmakers, the FEWS effort highlights the process underlying the deteriorat­ ing situation, hopefully with enou " specificity and forewarning to permit alternative intervention strategies to be examined and implemented, rood assistance strategies are key to famine avoidance. However, other types of intervention can be of major importance both in the short-term and in the long run, including medical, transport, storage, economic development policy change, etc. Where possible, estimates of food needs are included in the FEWS reports. It is important to understand, however, that no direct relation exists between numbers of persons at-risk and the quantity of food assistance needed. This is because famines are the culmination of slow-on:;et disaster processes which can be complex in the extreme.

The food needs of individual populations at-risk depend upon when in the disaster process identification is made and the extent of the cumuiative impact cn the individuals concerned. Further, the amount of food assistance required, whether from internal or external sources, depends upon a host of considerations. Thus the estimates of food needs presented periodically in FEWS reports should not be interpreted to mean food aid need., e.g., as under PL480 or other donor programs.

FE\VS depends on a variety of US Government agencies, private voluntary organizations (PVO's), international relief agencies, foreign press and host governmernt reports as sources of information used in the country reports. In particular, a debt of gratitude is owed to many individuals within various offices of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) who routinely provide valuable information: the offices of Food For Peace and Voluntary Assistance (FFP/FVA), and the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). The contributions of time Systeme d'Alerte Precoce/Mali and the National Drought Committee (CNAVS) to this report are substantial and highly appreciated. Additional useful information is also provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administartion (NOAA), the National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA), AGRHYMET/- Niamey, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (UNFAO) Global Information and Early Warning System (GIEWS), the World Food Programme, and other U.N. agencies.

FEWS'is operated by AID's Office of Technical Rasources in the Bureau for Africa (AFR/TR) in cooperation with numerous U.S. Government and other organizations. The FEWS Country Reports are working documents of AFR/TR and should not be construed as official pronouncements of the U.S. Agency for International Development.