DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable D1 CEEC Data and Method SCENES ST-97-RS-2277

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable D1 CEEC Data and Method SCENES ST-97-RS-2277 Deliverable D1 CEEC data and method SCENES ST-97-RS-2277 Project Coordinator: Marcial Echenique & Partners Ltd Institut fŸr Wirstschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsforschung (DE) Partners: Institut National de Recherche sur les Transport et leur SŽcuritŽ (FR) Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) LT Consultants Ltd (FI) TRT Trasporti e Territorio Srl (IT) KšzlekedŽstudom‡nyi IntŽzet RT (HU) NEA Transport research and training (NL) ISIS SA (FR) Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft und Raumfahrt e V (DE) Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (ES) Marcial Echenique y Compa–ia (ES) Centro Studi sui Sistemi Transporto S.p.A (IT) University of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics (PL) University of Leeds (GB) Niezaleny Osrodek Badan Ekonomkznych (PL) National Technical University of Athens (GR) EPFL (CH) Date: June 1999 PROJECT FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION UNDER THE TRANSPORT RTD PROGRAMME OF THE 4th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 1. MACROECONOMIC DATA IN CEEC................................................................................... 4 1.1 GENERAL REMARKS............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 REGIONAL UNITS ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1 Poland...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Bulgaria.................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Russia....................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 Hungary.................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.5 Czech Republic........................................................................................................... 7 1.2.6 Slovak Republic .......................................................................................................... 8 1.2.7 Romania.................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.8 Yugoslavia................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.9 Slovenia .................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.10 Croatia..................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.11 Other Countries.........................................................................................................10 1.3 GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA AVAILABILITY AND RELIABILITY .........................................10 1.4 DATA RELIABILITY (BY COUNTRIES).......................................................................................15 1.4.1 Poland (rank 1).........................................................................................................15 1.4.2 Belarus (rank 3) ........................................................................................................16 1.4.3 Bulgaria (rank 3).......................................................................................................16 1.4.4 Baltic Countries (rank - Estonia 2, Latvia and Lithuania 3) .............................................16 1.4.5 Macedonia (rank 3)....................................................................................................17 1.4.6 Russia (rank 3)..........................................................................................................17 1.4.7 Ukraine (rank 3)........................................................................................................17 1.4.8 Croatia (rank 2)........................................................................................................18 1.4.9 Czech Republic (rank 1)..............................................................................................18 1.4.10 Hungary (rank 1).......................................................................................................18 1.4.11 Romania (rank 2).......................................................................................................19 1.4.12 Slovakia (rank 2) .......................................................................................................19 1.4.13 Slovenia (rank 1) .......................................................................................................19 1.4.14 Yugoslavia (rank 2)....................................................................................................20 1.5 DATA COVERAGE ...............................................................................................................20 1.6 DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................22 2. TRANSPORT DATA IN CEEC.............................................................................................23 2.1 NETWORK DATA ................................................................................................................23 2.1.1 Transport infrastructure in the CEEC - existing studies and analyses.................................23 2.1.1.1 EC, Phare and Eurostat report ÒTransport development in the Central European countries.............2 4 2.1.1.2 TINA project..............................................................................................................................................................2 4 2.1.2 Road network............................................................................................................25 2.1.2.1 Belarus.........................................................................................................................................................................2 6 2.1.2.2 Bulgaria.......................................................................................................................................................................2 7 2.1.2.3 Croatia..........................................................................................................................................................................2 7 2.1.2.4 Czech Republic..........................................................................................................................................................2 8 2.1.2.5 Estonia.........................................................................................................................................................................2 8 2.1.2.6 Hungary.......................................................................................................................................................................2 9 2.1.2.7 Latvia...........................................................................................................................................................................3 0 2.1.2.8 Lithuania.....................................................................................................................................................................3 0 2.1.2.9 Moldova......................................................................................................................................................................3 1 2.1.2.10 Poland..........................................................................................................................................................................3 1 2.1.2.11 Romania.......................................................................................................................................................................3 5 2.1.2.12 Russia...........................................................................................................................................................................3 5 2.1.2.13 Slovak Republic........................................................................................................................................................3 6 2.1.2.14 Slovenia.......................................................................................................................................................................3 6 2.1.2.15 Ukraine........................................................................................................................................................................3 7 2.1.2.16 Yugoslavia.................................................................................................................................................................3 7 2.1.3 Rail network .............................................................................................................37 2.1.3.1 Belarus.........................................................................................................................................................................3 8 2.1.3.2 Bulgaria.......................................................................................................................................................................3 8 2.1.3.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case of West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland
    2018, 26(1)26(1): 69–81 MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS Vol. 23/2015 No. 4 MORAVIAN MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS Institute of Geonics, The Czech Academy of Sciences journal homepage: http://www.geonika.cz/mgr.html Figures 8, 9: New small terrace houses in Wieliczka town, the Kraków metropolitan area (Photo: S. Kurek) doi: 10.2478/mgr-2018-0006 Illustrations to the paper by S. Kurek et al. The development of peripheral areas: The case of West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland Martin KEBZA a * Abstract The process of peripheralisation of outlying areas is discussed in this article using a case study of West Pomeranian (Zachodniopomorskie) Voivodeship in Poland. Emphasis is placed on the relationship between these peripheral areas and metropolitan core areas. Scalar and vector data on selected indicators in the years 2005 and 2015 for gminas (communes, territorial units NUTS 5) are presented. The values for both years were observed as well as the change between them. A composite indicator based on the calculated data was developed, and it served as the basis for categorisation of metropolitan, 'semi-peripheral' and peripheral areas, which were further defined on the basis of their intrinsic properties and location in the region. The development of such peripheral areas is assessed more generally in the conclusions. Keywords: periphery, metropolitan area, regional development, West Pomeranian voivodeship, Zachodniopomorskie, Poland Article history: Received 20 October 2016; Accepted 30 August 2017; Published 31 March 2018 1. Introduction problems, either because of their remoteness, post-war The process of peripheralisation is discussed in this population movements and subsequent changes, or their article – the development of peripheral areas with a negative values on various socio-economic indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • 270360Financing0roads0poland
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized FINANCING ROADS IN POLAND – PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE OPTIONS FINAL REPORT JUNE 2002 comments added in October 2002 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The views and interpretations herein are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to any individual acting on its behalf Financing Roads in Poland... LIST OF CONTENTS Introduction PART A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART B: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Study findings...................................................................................................... B/1 1.1 Roads and traffic - present state................................................................ B/1 1.2 Ongoing investments ................................................................................ B/6 1.3 Road financing.......................................................................................... B/8 1.4 Sector approach and European context..................................................... B/11 1.5 New programs........................................................................................... B/15 1.6 Other problems ......................................................................................... B/16 2 Recommendations............................................................................................... B/19 PART C: BACKGROUND REPORT 1 Organization and development of public roads – assessment ........................ C/1 1.1 Organizational responsibility for each category
    [Show full text]
  • Road Transport in Poland - Status and Development Prospects Submitted 18/03/21, 1St Revision 10/04/21, 2Nd Revision 28/04/21, Accepted 10/06/21
    European Research Studies Journal Volume XXIV, Issue 2B, 2021 pp. 276-289 Road Transport in Poland - Status and Development Prospects Submitted 18/03/21, 1st revision 10/04/21, 2nd revision 28/04/21, accepted 10/06/21 Bartosz Zakrzewski1, Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska2 Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this article is to present the arguments that motor vehicle transport in Poland has a significant impact on the economic development of the country, not only creating prospects for the development of the Polish army (modern equipment and armaments) but providing citizens of the Republic of Poland with the opportunity to move safely from place to place with modern car fleet on newly built roads. Methodology: Statistical information collected from available sources and reports is the basis for the analyses presented in the article. The primary research method is observation, analysis, and inference. Available source materials from Polish statistical institutions and ministerial ones have been analyzed, and the industry transport journals. Findings: Motor vehicle transport has a significant share in generating GDP. Since 1990, motor vehicle transport in Poland has been developing rapidly and over the last 30 years has been significantly stimulating the economy, created jobs, was the leaven of the scientific and technical progress, made a significant contribution to exports, promoted local investments, and created conditions for cooperation with other industries and science. Practical Implications: Many detailed threads have only been mentioned and are waiting for further development. However, the most important is the decision on the Polish state's support for the further development of the Polish automotive industry, which in the long term will contribute to the security of the Polish state and its inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • State Aid Rules and Public Financing of Infrastructure. the Case of Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A
    State Aid Rules and Public Financing of Infrastructure. The Case of Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. State Aid Rules and Public Financing of Infrastructure. The Case of Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. Paulina Kubera Poznań University of Technology 2 Jacka Rychlewskiego Str., Poznań 60-965, Poland Email: [email protected] Abstract: The operation of a toll road typically involves an economic activity for which State aid rules apply. However, if the construction and operation of the road infrastructure is bundled and they are tendered out together, they usually fall outside the State aid regime. The reason for it lies in the fact that the use of competitive procurement procedures aim to increase the effi ciency of public expenditure and to ensure a level playing fi eld for private operators to compete for public contracts. Nevertheless, based on the European Commission’s decisional practice, it transpires that an economic advantage for a concession holder cannot be ruled out automatically, in particular when there are amendments made to the original agreement. On the example of the Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. case, critical State aid issues are discussed, among others, the application of State aid rules to public fi nancing of infrastructure, the amendments made to a concession contract in the light of the risk assignment problem, as well as the existence of State aid in the form of overcompensation for a concession holder. The considerations are carried out on the canvas of a concrete case; however, they are enriched by the analysis of relevant legal provisions as well as conclusions from the EU courts and the European Commission decisions made in similar cases.
    [Show full text]
  • For Promoting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure
    ADB DEVELOPING BEST PRACTICES FOR PROMOTING PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE ROADS Asian Development Bank The views, conclusions, and recommendations presented here are those of the study consultants, and should not be considered to represent the official views of the Asian Development Bank or its member governments. © Asian Development Bank 2000 ISBN No. 971-561-280-6 Stock No. 010300 Published by the Asian Development Bank P.O. Box 789, 0980 Manila, Philippines For more information on ADB, visit http:\\www.adb.org FOREWORD This report is one of a series of five commissioned by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to identify and recommend best practices to be followed and specific steps to be taken, by ADB’s developing member countries in order to encourage both private sector investment and competition in infrastructure development. The study was financed through a $600,000 regional technical assistance grant - RETA 5753: Developing Best Practices for Promoting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure. This report focuses on the road sector; the other reports cover the power, water supply, airport and air traffic control, and port sectors. Transport is central to achieving prosperity and the quality of life, to which all countries aspire. Transport policy has pervasive impacts: on economic performance; on the shape and structure of human settlements through its impact upon physical development and economic structures; on the distribution of income; and on the environment. This report develops best practices for promoting private sector investment in the road sector. It defines the objectives of private sector participation, reviews experiences of private sector participation in Asia and elsewhere, examines the degree of success that has been achieved to date, and identifies the key issues that provide the basis for determining best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego
    DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WOJEWÓDZTWA ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIEGO Szczecin, dnia 10 maja 2017 r. Poz. 2184 UCHWAŁA NR XXII/361/17 SEJMIKU WOJEWÓDZTWA ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIEGO z dnia 25 kwietnia 2017 r. w sprawie przyjęcia „Wojewódzkiego programu opieki nad zabytkami na lata 2017-2020” Na podstawie art. 18 pkt 20 ustawy z dnia 5 czerwca 1998 r. o samorządzie województwa (Dz. U. z 2016 r., poz. 486, zmiany: Dz. U. z 2016 r., poz.1948, poz. 2260) w związku z art. 87 ust. 3 oraz ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami (Dz. U. z 2014 r. poz. 1446, zmiany: Dz. U. z 2015 r. poz. 397, poz. 774, poz. 1505; Dz. U. z 2016 r. poz. 1330, poz. 1887, poz. 1948) Sejmik Wojewódz- twa Zachodniopomorskiego uchwala, co następuje: § 1. Przyjmuje się „Wojewódzki program opieki nad zabytkami na lata 2017-2020” w brzmieniu jak w za- łączniku do niniejszej uchwały. § 2. Wykonanie uchwały powierza się Zarządowi Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego. § 3. Uchwała wchodzi w życie z dniem podjęcia i podlega ogłoszeniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Woje- wództwa Zachodniopomorskiego. Przewodnicząca Sejmiku Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego Teresa Kalina Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego – 2 – Poz. 2184 WOJEWODZKI PROGRAM OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI WOJEWÓDZTWA ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIEGO NA LATA 2017-2020 Szczecin, luty 2017 r. Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego – 3 – Poz. 2184 Opracowanie wykonane dla ZARZĄDU WOJEWÓDZTWA ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIEGO przez Biuro Dokumentacji Zabytków w Szczecinie CEZARY NOWAKOWSKI MARIA WITEK ALEKSANDRA HAMBERG-FEDEROWICZ WALDEMAR WITEK Współpraca: Anna Bartczak Kamila Wójcik Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego – 4 – Poz. 2184 Spis treści: WSTĘP I. PODSTAWY PRAWNE I CELE WPONZ II. PRAWNE I PROGRAMOWE UWARUNKOWANIA OCHRONY I OPIEKI NAD DZIEDZICTWEM KULTUROWYM 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 9 Concession Experience in the Road
    Louis Berger S.A. APPENDIX 9 CONCESSION EXPERIENCE IN THE ROAD TRANSPORTATION SECTOR IN CENTRAL EUROPE 1. BACKGROUND Introduction During recent years, the goal in several countries in Central Europe has been to aim to bring an increasing participation of the private sector into the development of transport infrastructure. This has occurred in differing ways, with differing results through the whole spectrum from fully privatised, and public/private partnerships to wholly publicly financed projects. This paper summarises some of the key projects which have been realised, or are under realisation, principally in the countries of Hungary, Poland and Croatia in the Road Transport Sector. The focus therefore is on selected concessions for toll motorways in these countries. Hungary Under the previous government, there was a strong policy towards promoting the development of motorways in the Republic of Hungary on a privately financed basis. With enactment of the Concessions Act, the Ministry of Transport actively promoted the development of several Concessions. Poland In the Republic of Poland, the promotion of new motorways was stimulated by the enactment of the Motorway Act in 1994. However it has taken several years to reach realisation of the first toll motorway. The Act was modified in 1999 in order to favour the developments of public-private partnerships, under the management of the Motorway Agency. Eventually, an operating Concession was agreed as part of the A4 motorway between Krakow and Katowice and the first real concession for construction and realisation of a new motorway was closed in October 2000, for a section of the A2 motorway between Poznan and Konin, on the Berlin-Warsaw axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for Hungary
    DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR HUNGARY As approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting on 22 January 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................... 1 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 3 1. THE BANK’S PORTFOLIO................................................................................................. 5 1.1. OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES TO DATE ..............................................................................5 1.2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PREVIOUS COUNTRY STRATEGY ...........................................6 1.4. SELECTED LESSONS LEARNT ........................................................................................9 1.5. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE EXISTING PORTFOLIO ..............................................9 1.6. MOBILISATION OF CO-FINANCING.................................................................................9 2. OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT................................................................................... 10 2.1. THE GENERAL REFORM ENVIRONMENT......................................................................10 2.1.1. Political environment.................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Role of Museums in the Polish-German
    1 2014, Iziko Museums Publications in association with ICOM-SA, Cape Town IZIKO MUSEUMS OF SOUTH AFRICA 25 Queen Victoria Street, Cape Town, 8001 Telephone: +27 21 481 3800 Fax: +27 21 481 3993 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.iziko.org.za ICOM-SA 3 Davann Court, 50 Bellair Road, Vredehoek, Cape Town, 8001 Telephone: +27 21 461 2315 Fax: +27 82 660 5497 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.icom-sa.org.za ISBN: 978-0-621-43105-6 Design: Estelle Tanner.design All material is strictly copyright and all rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is forbidden. 2 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgment 1 Introduction Shahid Vawda 3 Powerful Ideas – Museums, Empire Utopias and Connected Worlds Susan Legêne 15 Cultural Policy as Utopia: The Case of South Africa Shahid Vawda 31 Teachers and Museums Wayne Alexander 49 Politics and the Presentation of Cultures in Museums Zvjezdana Antos 69 From Ethnology to Civilisations Museum, the Multiple Trajectories of ATP/MuCEM Collections 81 Myriame Morel-Deledalle In Search of the Utopia of the Past: Reflections of Antiquity Upon a National Narrative Katerina Mavromichali 93 Global Challenges for Regional Utopias Dennis Hermann 113 Imposed Utopias. Establishing Collections, Building the Israeli Nation State Judy Jaffe-Schagen 123 4 Museum Collections between Ideology and Reflection Tone Kregar & Tanja Roženbergar 139 Images for the Future: Aspects on Collecting Contemporary Images and on Future Collections 151 Elisabeth Boogh & Merja Diaz Seeking Common Ground: How Digital Museums Might Play a Role
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORT PUBLIKACJA2 Łu
    Developed by: Wielkopolska Regional Territorial Observatory (Wielkopolskie Regionalne Obserwatorium Terytorialne) Department of Regional Policy the Marshal Office of the Wielkopolska Region SELECTED ISSUES OF TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT IN THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGION 2017 COLLECTION OF ARTICLES Poznań, October 2017 . SELECTED ISSUES OF TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT IN THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGION TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... 2 PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................ 3 TRANSPORT CORRIDORS / TEN-T ................................................................................................... 5 TRANSPORT POLICY OF THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGION LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SUBSEQUENT EDITIONS OF THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGION DEVELOPMENTAL STRATEGY ................................................................................ Bł ąd! Nie zdefiniowano zakładki. EUROPEAN CORRIDORS IN THE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGION ..................................................................................................................................... 28 WIELKOPOLSKA REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAM FOR 2014-2020 AND TRANSPORT PLAN FOR THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGIONS AS EXAMPLES OF IMPLEMENTATION INSTRUMENTS FOR TRANSPORT POLICY OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF THE WIELKOPOLSKA REGION ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Road Traffic Safety Indices by Means of Regression with Panel Data Katarzyna Brzozowska-Rup Marzena Nowakowska
    Engineering Management in Production and Services Volume 12 • Issue 4 • 2020 received: 30 July 2020 accepted: 1 December 2020 pages: 40-51 Modelling road traffic safety indices by means of regression with panel data Katarzyna Brzozowska-Rup Marzena Nowakowska A B S T R A C T Although the occurrence of road accidents and the number of road accident casualties in almost all Polish voivodeships has decreased over the last few years, the rate of this change varies considerably from region to region. To provide a better understanding of such a tendency, panel data regression models are proposed to conduct this pilot research which evaluates the relative performance of Polish regions in terms of their road traffic safety. Panel data are multi-dimensional data which involve measurements over time. In the research, a voivodeship is a unit analysed at a group level, whereas a year is a unit analysed at a time level. A two-way error component regression model has been applied to survey the impact of regressors, the group effects, and time effects on a dependent variable. The analysis has been conducted using data acquired from the Statistics Poland Local Data Bank website, as well as from the General Directorate for National Roads and Motorways. The panel data from 16 regions in Poland and the 2012–2018 period have been investigated. The examined models refer to road traffic safety indices defined based on the following characteristics: the number of road accidents, the number road fatalities, and the number of people injured. The results of all the three models indicate a negative effect as regards the GDP per capita, (car) motorisation rate, the indicator of government expenditure for current maintenance of national roads, and the road length per capita.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    International Newsletter. No. 8. May 2003 Spoils of War. No. 8. May 2003 2 Imprint: Editorial Board: Bart Eeman, István Fodor, Michael M. Franz, Ekaterina Genieva, Wojciech Kowalski, Jacques Lust, Isabelle le Masne de Chermont, Anne Webber. Editor: Dr. Michael M. Franz. Technical assistance and translation: Svea Janner, Yvonne Sommermeyer. Editorial address: Koordinierungsstelle für Kulturgutverluste City-Carré Kantstraße 5 39104 Magdeburg Phone: 0049 - 391 – 544 87 09 Fax: 0049 - 391 – 53 53 96 33 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.lostart.de Addresses of the members of the Editorial Board: •Bart Eeman, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Directorate Economic Relations, Rue Gen Leman 60, 1040 Brussels, Belgium, phone: 0032/2065897, fax: 0032/25140389. •István Fodor, Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum, Múzeum körni 14-16, 1088 Budapest, Hungary, phone: 36/1/3184259, fax: 36/1/3382/673. e-mail: [email protected]. •Michael M. Franz, Koordinierungsstelle für Kulturgutverluste, City Carré, Kantstrasse 5, 39104 Magdeburg, Germany, phone: 0049/391/5448709, fax: 0049/391/53539633, e-mail: [email protected] anhalt.de. •Ekaterina Genieva, All Russia State Library for Foreign Literature Moscow, Nikolojamskaja Street 1, 109 189 Moscow, Russia, phone: 7/095/915 3621, fax: 7/095/915 3637, e-mail: [email protected]. •Wojciech Kowalski, University of Silesia, Department of Intellectual and Cultural Property Law, ul. Bankowa 8, 40 007 Katowice, Poland, phone/fax: 48/32/517104, phone: 48/32/588211, fax: 48/32/599188; e-mail: [email protected]. •Jacques Lust, Service of the Prime Minister, Rue du Musee 9, 1000 Brussels, Belgium, phone: 0032/475204462, fax: 0032/25083232, email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]