DC/18/05621 Land Off Jacks Green Road, Creeting St Mary, Suffolk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DC/18/05621 Land Off Jacks Green Road, Creeting St Mary, Suffolk Consultee Comments for Planning Application DC/18/05621 Application Summary Application Number: DC/18/05621 Address: Land Off Jacks Green Road Creeting St Mary Suffolk Proposal: Outline Planning Application (all matters reserved) - Residential Development for up to 43 dwellings(14 affordable). Case Officer: Daniel Cameron Consultee Details Name: Mrs Jennie Blackburn Address: 1 All Saints Road, Creeting St Mary, Ipswich, Suffolk IP6 8NF Email: [email protected] On Behalf Of: Creeting St. Mary Parish Clerk Comments The Parish Council strongly object to this application for the following reasons: - Over development of Creeting St Mary - Over subscribed school and struggling doctors surgery in Needham Market - Power cables overhead of the proposed site - Current flooding issues would become a lot worse Daniel Cameron Our ref: AE/2019/124097/02-L01 Mid Suffolk District Council Your ref: DC/18/05621 Planning Department Endeavour House Russell Road Date: 21 May 2019 Ipswich Suffolk IP1 2BX Dear Mr Cameron RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR UP TO 43 DWELLINGS(14 AFFORDABLE). LAND OFF JACKS GREEN ROAD, CREETING ST MARY, SUFFOLK Thank you for your consultation dated 13 May 2019. We have reviewed the application as submitted and have no objections provided the conditions below on Groundwater and Contaminated Land are includeded should the permission be granted. We are also including advice on Flood Risk below. Groundwater and Contaminated Land The site is located on Secondary B head deposits to the north of the site and Secondary A aquifer, Glaciofluvial sand and gravel deposits over the rest of the application site. The bedrock beneath the site is Newhaven Chalk, a principal aquifer. The site is within a Source Protection Zone 3 and a Surface Water Safeguarded Zone. We have reviewed the Geosphere Environmental Phase 1 Desk Study and PRA dated 6/2/19 and recommend the following condition is attached to any planning application granted. We consider that planning permission could be granted to the proposed development as submitted if the following planning conditions are included as set out below. Without these conditions, the proposed development on this site poses an unacceptable risk to the environment and we would object to the application. Condition If, during development, contamination not previously identified is found to be present at the site then no further development (unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority) shall be carried out until the developer has submitted a remediation strategy to the local planning authority detailing how this unsuspected contamination Environment Agency Iceni House Cobham Road, Ipswich, IP3 9JD. Customer services line: 03708 506 506 www.gov.uk/environment-agency Cont/d.. shall be dealt with and obtained written approval from the local planning authority. The remediation strategy shall be implemented as approved. Reason for Condition To protect and prevent the pollution of the water environment (particularly groundwater associated with the underlying Secondary and Principal Aquifers, from potential pollutants associated with current and previous land uses) in line with National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF; paragraphs 170 and 178), EU Water Framework Directive, Anglian River Basin Management Plan and Environment Agency Groundwater Protection Position Statements (2017) A4 – A6, J1 – J7 and N7. National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) paragraph 170 states that the planning system should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by preventing both new and existing development from contributing to or being put at unacceptable risk from, or being adversely affected by unacceptable levels of water pollution. Government policy also states that planning policies and decisions should also ensure that adequate site investigation information, prepared by a competent person, is presented (NPPF, paragraph 178). Surface Water Drainage The INGENT FRA dated April 2019 has confirmed infiltration drainage is not proposed on the site and therefore GWCL have no further comments. We recommend that developers should: 1) Refer to our ‘Groundwater Protection’ website; 2) Refer to our CL:AIRE Water and Land Library (WALL) which includes the risk management framework provided in CLR11, ‘Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination’, when dealing with land affected by contamination, and also includes the Guiding Principles for Land Contamination for the type of information that we require in order to assess risks to controlled waters from the site. The Local Authority can advise on risk to other receptors, for example human health; 3) Refer to our Land Contamination Technical Guidance; 4) Refer to ‘Position Statement on the Definition of Waste: Development Industry Code of Practice’; 5) Refer to British Standards BS 5930:1999 A2:2010 Code of practice for site investigations and BS10175:2011 A1: 2013 Investigation of potentially contaminated sites – code of practice 6) Refer to our ‘Piling and Penetrative Ground Improvement Methods on Land Affected by Contamination’ National Groundwater & Contaminated Land Centre Project NC/99/73. The selected method, including environmental mitigation measures, should be presented in a ‘Foundation Works Risk Assessment Report’, guidance on producing this can be found in Table 3 of ‘Piling Into Contaminated Sites’; 7) Refer to our ‘Good Practice for Decommissioning Boreholes and Wells’. 8) Refer to our ‘Dewatering building sites and other excavations: environmental permits’ guidance when temporary dewatering is proposed Flood Risk We have no flood risk objection to the planning application, providing that you are Cont/d.. 2 satisfied that the development would be safe for its lifetime and you assess the acceptability of the issues within your remit. The applicant has sequentially sited all proposed development within Flood Zone 1. Our maps show the site boundary lies within fluvial Flood Zone 3a defined by the ‘Planning Practice Guidance: Flood Risk and Coastal Change’ as having a high probability of flooding. The proposal is for residential development for up to 43 dwellings, which is classified as a ‘more vulnerable’ development, as defined in Table 2: Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification of the Planning Practice Guidance. We are satisfied that the flood risk assessment, referenced 1708-024 Creeting St Mary, Suffolk, Rev A and dated April 2019, provides you with the information necessary to make an informed decision. In particular: Drawing 252 01 Rev A shows all proposed development (residential dwellings) lies within Flood Zone 1 The access and egress route travels through Flood Zones 1 and therefore does have a safe route of access. Flood depths on the site and within the building remain unknown because the Flood Zones are derived from JFLOW modelling. Flood Storage Compensation is not required. A Flood Evacuation Plan has not yet been proposed. JFlow The Flood Zone maps in this area are formed of national generalised modelling, which was used in 2004 to create fluvial floodplain maps on a national scale. This modelling was improved more recently, using a more detailed terrain model for the area. This modelling is not a detailed local assessment, it is used to give an indication of areas at risk from flooding. JFLOW outputs are not suitable for detailed decision making. Normally, in these circumstances, an FRA will need to undertake a modelling exercise in order to derive flood levels and extents, both with and without allowances for climate change, for the watercourse, in order to inform the design for the site. However, as the applicant has sequentially sited their proposed development to be wholly within Flood Zone 1, we feel it is unnecessary to request the applicant to model the designated ordinary watercourse with regards to the safety of the proposed development because the development should remain dry and provide refuge throughout the 0.1% (1 in 1000) annual probability event. If you feel you do not have sufficient information with regards to flood levels on the access/egress routes, we advise that modelling should be undertaken to accurately establish the risk to the access/egress routes in terms of potential depths and locations of flooding. The watercourse should be modelled in a range of return period events, including the 1 in 20 (5%), 1 in 100 (1%) and 1 in 1000 (0.1%) year events, both with and without the addition of climate change. Please remember to request the new climate change allowances. The flood levels on the access/egress routes should be determined and compared to a topographic site survey to determine the flood depths and extents along the access/egress routes. This should be used to establish a route of safe access. Cont/d.. 3 Further flood risk advice can be found in the appendix to this letter. We trust this advice is useful. Yours sincerely Mr Liam Robson Sustainable Places - Planning Advisor Direct dial 020 8474 8923 Direct e-mail [email protected] Cont/d.. 4 Flood Risk Appendix Guidance for Local Council on Safety of Inhabitants Safety of Building The development has been designed to provide refuge above the predicted flood levels. Given that refuge is identified as a fall back mitigation measure it is important that the building is structurally resilient to withstand the pressures and forces (hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures) associated with flood water. We advise that supporting information and calculations are submitted to you to provide certainty that the buildings will be constructed to withstand these water pressures. Emergency Flood Plan The Environment Agency does not normally comment on or approve the adequacy of flood emergency response procedures accompanying development proposals, as we do not carry out these roles during a flood. Our involvement with this development during an emergency will be limited to delivering flood warnings to occupants/users covered by our flood warning network. The Planning Practice Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework states that those proposing developments should take advice from the emergency services when producing an evacuation plan for the development as part of the flood risk assessment.
Recommended publications
  • Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocations Stage 1: Strategic Appraisal
    Babergh & Mid Suffolk District Councils Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocationsx Stage 1: strategic appraisal Final report Prepared by LUC October 2020 Babergh & Mid Suffolk District Councils Heritage Impact Assessment for Local Plan Site Allocations Stage 1: strategic appraisal Project Number 11013 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for review R. Brady R. Brady S. Orr 05.05.2020 M. Statton R. Howarth F. Smith Nicholls 2. Final for issue R. Brady S. Orr S. Orr 06.05.2020 3. Updated version with additional sites F. Smith Nicholls R. Brady S. Orr 12.05.2020 4. Updated version - format and typographical K. Kaczor R. Brady S. Orr 13.10.2020 corrections Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents HIA Strategic Appraisal October 2020 Contents Cockfield 18 Wherstead 43 Eye 60 Chapter 1 Copdock 19 Woolverstone 45 Finningham 62 Introduction 1 Copdock and Washbrook 19 HAR / Opportunities 46 Great Bicett 62 Background 1 East Bergholt 22 Great Blakenham 63 Exclusions and Limitations 2 Elmsett 23 Great Finborough 64 Chapter 4 Sources 2 Glemsford 25 Assessment Tables: Mid Haughley 64 Document Structure 2 Great Cornard
    [Show full text]
  • Creeting House
    CREETING HOUSE CREETING ST MARY • SUFFOLK CREETING HOUSE ALL SAINTS ROAD • CREETING ST MARY • SUFFOLK • IP 6 8 PR A substantial Grade II Listed former Rectory of just under 7,000 sq.ft providing a fantastic business opportunity or conversion back to a family home, subject to planning, with the added benefit of gardens, grounds and 10 Risbygate Street, Bury St Edmunds outbuildings to include a Listed barn all set Suffolk IP33 3AA [email protected] within just under 9¾ acres (s.t.s) 01284 748600 6 Crowe St, Stowmarket ACCOMMODATION SUMMARY Suffolk IP14 1DN [email protected] Hall • Drawing Room • Sitting Room • Dining Room • WC • Study 01449 612384 Utility Room • Caterer’s Kitchen • Aga Kitchen/Breakfast Room • Rear Hall • WC • Cellars www.lsk.co.uk First Floor – Landing • Five Bedrooms all en-suite Half Landing – Staff/Granny flat: Bedroom, Sitting Room, Kitchen and Bathroom Second Floor – Two further Bedrooms • Bathroom and Attic Room Outbuildings • Parking • Barn • Garage • Office • Store Room Gardens and grounds approaching just over 9 ¾ acres (s.t.s) 3 DISTANCES CREETING HOUSE A14 (J51) 2 miles Creeting House is a wonderful Grade II Listed former Rectory Stowmarket 4 miles presenting brick and flint elevations under a plain tiled, gable Ipswich 16 miles ended, steeply pitched roofline. The property is a great example of high Victorian gothic architecture dating back to 1861. The versatile accommodation is predominantly arranged over two floors, and of particular note are the formal reception rooms providing wonderful ceiling heights and views over the rear garden and the drawing room which has a Jacobean style carved wooden chimney piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Reference Number Current Rateable Value Primary Liable
    Current Liable Property Reference Rateable Responsibility Number Value Primary Liable party name Start Date MSN70010050020 5300 01/05/2013 MSN70010055010 10750 01/08/2004 MSN70010105030 14000 Stealth Electronics Ltd 01/06/2006 MSN70020155010 5800 01/04/2000 MSN70020205080 11250 Suffolk Wildlife Trust 01/04/2000 MSN70020205130 6300 Property Aid Ltd 19/02/2008 MSN70020205140 9300 Ashbocking Joinery Ltd 19/02/2008 MSN70020205180 5800 01/04/2011 MSN70020205210 42750 The Suffolk Apple Juice And Cider Co Ltd 01/03/2010 MSN70020505150 7100 Smart Offices Ltd 01/10/2010 MSN70030305130 20500 Miles Drainage Ltd 01/04/2000 MSN70030305360 5000 Miles Drainage Ltd 01/10/2000 MSN70030355020 19750 Miles Waterscapes Limited 21/07/2004 MSN70040155040 6400 Everything Everywhere Ltd 01/04/2000 MSN70050305010 55500 Lt/Cmdr J Chevalier-Guild 01/04/2000 MSN70070155011 43750 26/04/2005 MSN70070155100 24500 Wheatley Associates Ltd 01/04/2000 MSN70070155110 7000 Angel Air Ltd 20/08/2007 MSN70070355010 20500 26/11/2003 MSN70070505020 10250 01/04/2000 MSN70071305010 10250 01/04/2000 MSN70071305020 5200 01/04/2000 MSN70071355020 23750 01/04/2000 MSN70071355080 6200 01/04/2000 MSN70071355320 5000 01/08/2006 MSN70071355350 7500 27/11/2005 MSN70071455060 27250 Suffolk County Council 07/01/2002 MSN70071505060 5900 01/02/2011 MSN70071505070 9500 Portable Space Ltd 01/02/2011 MSN70071505150 6300 01/10/2009 MSN70071555010 13500 The Bull Inn (Bacton) Ltd 19/06/2012 MSN70071605010 14000 Anglian Water Services Ltd 01/04/2000 MSN70080055020 5400 Cascade Pools (East Anglia) Ltd
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes 27.07.20
    CREETING ST MARY PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish Council meeting held online via Zoom, Creeting St Mary on Monday, 27th July 2020 at 7.30pm. Present: Councillors: S Haynes (Chair) J Palmer R Coton P Scully N Smart L Plummer C Emmins H Craggs In Attendance: J Blackburn - Clerk County Cllr M Hicks District Cllr M Norris K Hartley (Rep from Social Club) CSM41/20/21 – PUBLIC FORUM There were no members of the public present. CSM42/20/21 – TO RECEIVE APOLOGIES OF ABSENCE None had been received. CSM43/20/21 – TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST None had been received. CSM44/20/21 – TO RECEIVE APPLICATIONS FOR DISPENSATION None had been received. CSM45/20/21 - TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 22nd JUNE 2020 It was AGREED: That the minutes of the meeting held on 22nd June 2020 be approved as a true record and signed by the Chair. CSM46/20/21 – TO RECEIVE THE COUNTY COUNCILLOR’S REPORT – CLLR M HICKS Cllr Hicks reported that: New plan sets out how Suffolk will prevent and respond to COVID-19 outbreak - A plan which set out how Suffolk would prevent and respond to a localised outbreak of COVID-19 was published on 30 June. Suffolk’s Local Outbreak Control Plan would be triggered where there were suspected or confirmed COVID-19 outbreaks in any setting or community within the county. The plan, a requirement of Government of all local authorities, outlined measures to prevent, manage, and contain outbreaks of Coronavirus and protect the public’s health. It builds on existing relationships and processes in place with partner agencies across Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • £415,000 Plot 5, Highfield Rise All Saints Road | Creeting St
    All Saints Road Creeting St Mary £415,000 Plot 5, Highfield Rise All Saints Road | Creeting St. Mary | Ipswich | IP6 8NF A140 0.5 miles, Needham Market 3 miles, A14 2.5 miles, Ipswich 7 miles Last remaining plot within a small exclusive development of six detached dwellings in a village location. Offering approximately 1500 sq.ft. of 3 bedroom accommodation in a generous plot with rural views to rear. Hall Area | Kitchen/Diner | Cloakroom | Utility | Living Room | 3 Double Bedrooms | En Suite Shower Room | Bathroom | Car Parking Plot 5 Plot 5 is one of six individual detached properties located within an exclusive development on the edge of the mid Suffolk village of Creeting St Mary. The house which is of an attractive contemporary design, is newly constructed and ready for immediate occupation. style fridge freezer. spaces, and a third visitor parking space positioned adjacent Offering approximately 1500 sq.ft. of accommodation the to the property. house offers a spacious open plan style hall and kitchen/diner The first floor accommodation includes 3 double bedrooms, together with separate cloakroom and utility, and with the with the master bedroom having an en suite shower room The rear garden which is south facing has been seeded to living room located at the rear of the property, and enjoying with double shower. The family bathroom provides a four grass, and also includes a large tiled patio area. Fencing round an attractive view over the rear garden towards the open piece suite including bath and separate shower cubicle. the garden is partly close boarded, with the remainder is post farmland beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Stock for Suffolk's Districts and Parishes 2003
    HOUSING STOCK FOR SUFFOLK’S DISTRICTS AND PARISHES 2003-2012 Prepared by Business Development 0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 2 Section 1 – Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 Section 2 – Data ................................................................................................................................ 3 County and District ..................................................................................................................... 3 Babergh ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Forest Heath .................................................................................................................................. 7 Ipswich (and Ipswich Policy Area) ....................................................................................... 8 Mid Suffolk ..................................................................................................................................... 9 St Edmundsbury ........................................................................................................................ 12 Suffolk Coastal ............................................................................................................................ 15 Waveney ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Suffolk District Council Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement for Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106
    Appendix A Mid Suffolk District Council Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement For Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 Reporting Period: From 01 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 1 Appendix A Community infrastructure Levy (CIL) Contributions 01/04/2019 TO 31/03/2020 CIL DEMAND NOTICES ISSUED IN 19/20 The total value of demand notices issued in the reported period is £10,203,165.63. Of this amount £10,202,892.90 is from liable floorspace, £0.00 is from surcharges imposed due to breaches of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations and £272.73 is late payment interest accrued. Planning Reference Site of CIL CIL Demand Contribution Notice DC/19/00338 Willow House, £11,390.75 Mendlesham Road, Cotton DC/19/00782 Land Adj Guerdon £81,133.73 Cottage, Drinkstone Road, Beyton DC/18/03581 Land At, Dovedale £33,161.40 Close, Badwell Ash DC/18/02043 The Institute Club, £61.23 122 High Street, Needham Market DC/17/04774 Building at £1,163.17 Chestnut Tree Farm, Framlingham Road, Laxfield DC/19/00328 Land at Town Lane £104.89 Farm, Park Green, Wetheringsett cum Brockford DC/18/02724 Dairy Farm, The £44.09 Street, Brundish DC/19/00996 Annexe, Kiln Farm £10,028.51 Cottage, Kiln Lane, Elmswell 2 Appendix A DC/19/01382 Southleigh, £9,368.53 Ashfield Road, Norton, DC/18/05357 Swan Inn, The £36,336.55 Street, Woolpit DC/18/03996 Land to the North £75,161.47 of Ashfield Road, Norton DC/18/05172 Southleigh, £7,913.83 Ashfield Road, Norton DC/17/06270 Site to the North of £18,011.03 the Willows, Flordon Road, Creeting St Mary 2112/16 Land on east side
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Suffolk District Council Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement for Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106
    Mid Suffolk District Council Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement For Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 Reporting Period: From 01 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 1 Community infrastructure Levy (CIL) Contributions 01/04/2019 TO 31/03/2020 CIL DEMAND NOTICES ISSUED IN 19/20 The total value of demand notices issued in the reported period is £10,203,165.63. Of this amount £10,202,892.90 is from liable floorspace, £0.00 is from surcharges imposed due to breaches of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations and £272.73 is late payment interest accrued. Planning Reference Site of CIL CIL Demand Contribution Notice DC/19/00338 Willow House, £11,390.75 Mendlesham Road, Cotton DC/19/00782 Land Adj Guerdon £81,133.73 Cottage, Drinkstone Road, Beyton DC/18/03581 Land At, Dovedale £33,161.40 Close, Badwell Ash DC/18/02043 The Institute Club, £61.23 122 High Street, Needham Market DC/17/04774 Building at £1,163.17 Chestnut Tree Farm, Framlingham Road, Laxfield DC/19/00328 Land at Town Lane £104.89 Farm, Park Green, Wetheringsett cum Brockford DC/18/02724 Dairy Farm, The £44.09 Street, Brundish DC/19/00996 Annexe, Kiln Farm £10,028.51 Cottage, Kiln Lane, Elmswell 2 DC/19/01382 Southleigh, £9,368.53 Ashfield Road, Norton, DC/18/05357 Swan Inn, The £36,336.55 Street, Woolpit DC/18/03996 Land to the North £75,161.47 of Ashfield Road, Norton DC/18/05172 Southleigh, £7,913.83 Ashfield Road, Norton DC/17/06270 Site to the North of £18,011.03 the Willows, Flordon Road, Creeting St Mary 2112/16 Land on east side £539,189.32 of Green Road, Woolpit
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Suffolk Record Office New Accessions 1 Jan 2016-31 Dec
    1 SUFFOLK RECORD OFFICE NEW ACCESSIONS 1 JAN 2016-31 DEC 2016 This list will also be published at http://www.suffolkarchives.co.uk/collections/recent-additions/ . Please note that if you wish to view any of the recently acquired collections you should contact the appropriate branch before visiting, as not all of these collections have been catalogued and therefore may not be available for public access yet. Bury branch CHEVINGTON SCHOOL: Samples of students’ work and display material, photographs, papers on school closure appeal and a small sample of attendance registers. c1935-1989 ADB527 LONG MELFORD PRIMARY SCHOOL: Governors' minutes 1997-2016 ADB552 CHEDBURGH VCP SCHOOL: Copy photographs of children; originals dated as above. Many images have names of the children pictured. 1958-1988 ADB586 HOWARD MIDDLE SCHOOL, BURY ST EDMUNDS: Photos, letters and newspaper articles 1972-2016; News articles collected by and concerning the school. 20th century ADB736 NEWMARKET ACADEMY: Three boxes of governing body papers, mostly minutes 1996-2014; Three digitised images of school photographs, originally taken in 1955/1957 and 1959; Photocopies of photos from Easter 1959 and 1962 (2pp) and Photocopies of SGS chess record (4pp) 2016 ADB737 HARDWICK MIDDLE SCHOOL, BURY ST EDMUNDS: 4 x admission registers (1976-2002); examples of pupils' work, 8 x scrapbooks of photographs of school events etc 1979-1999 and additional photographs; 4 x scrapbooks of school ‘memories’ 1991-2004; Certificates 1979-2012; Newspaper cuttings 1976-2014, 1976-2014; School history,
    [Show full text]
  • MSDC County Election NOP SOPS
    Suffolk County Council ELECTION OF COUNTY COUNCILLOR FOR THE BOSMERE DIVISION NOTICE OF POLL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT :- 1. A Poll for the Election of a COUNTY COUNCILLOR for the above named County Division will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00am and 10:00pm. 2. The number of COUNTY COUNCILLORS to be elected for the County Division is 1. 3. The names, in alphabetical order and other particulars of the candidates remaining validly nominated and the names of the persons signing the nomination papers are as follows:- SURNAME OTHER NAMES IN HOME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION PERSONS WHO SIGNED THE FULL NOMINATION PAPERS Oxford House 41 Finborough Ruth Coomber, Gregory BRITTON SUZANNE LAURE Labour Party Road Stowmarket IP14 1PS Douglas Edwin Coomber KAY MAXINE 89 Stowmarket Road Needham Conservative Party Richard Alfred Luff, Susan OAKES NADJINA Market Ipswich IP6 8ED Candidate Margaret Burnett 46 Crowley Road Needham Wendy Marchant, Sheila Mary PHILLIPS STEVE Liberal Democrat Market Suffolk IP6 8BJ Norris 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: POLLING POLLING STATION DESCRIPTIONS OF PERSONS DISTRICT ENTITLED TO VOTE THEREAT MBAY Baylham Village Hall Upper Street Baylham IP6 8JR 1.000-227.000 MBDL Needham Market Community Centre Main Hall Community Centre School Street 1.000-69.000 Needham Market IP6 8BB MBRK Barking Village Hall Annexe The Tye Barking IP6 8HP 1.000-337.000 MBTT Battisford Village Hall Straight Road Battisford IP14 2HP 1.000-482.500 MCOM
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Paper – Settlement Hierarchy Review
    Working Together Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Regulation 18 Consultation Topic Paper – Settlement Hierarchy Review July 2019 1. Introduction 1.1 This Topic Paper accompanies the Settlement Hierarchy section of the Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Draft Local Plan (July 2019). 1.2 The purpose of this Topic Paper is to present additional detail and context behind the new Settlement Hierarchy as proposed by the Joint Local Plan. 1.3 As part of the preparation of the new Joint Local Plan for Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils, a review of the settlement hierarchy was carried out to reflect changes that have occurred over recent years and to ensure that the settlements are appropriately categorised in relation to the services and facilities they provide. 1.4 This study collates information on the services and facilities availability of villages in both districts. Comments received during the Joint Local Plan consultation (August – November 2017) have been considered in the production of this Topic Paper and the resulting Settlement Hierarchy in the Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan. 1.5 Babergh and Mid Suffolk currently have different settlement hierarchies as set out in the Babergh Core Strategy (2014) and Mid Suffolk Core Strategy (2008). The Joint Local Plan seeks to provide a single hierarchy across both Districts, and this Topic Paper classifies ‘Core Villages’, ‘Hinterland Villages’ and ‘Hamlets’. The classification is based on the availability of, or access to, facilities and services, to indicate their relative sustainability as locations for development. Settlements that do not have ten or more well related dwellings have not been identified in the settlement hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 No. 1220 CORONERS the Suffolk (Coroners' Districts) Order 2001
    0 R STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2001 No. 1220 CORONERS The Suffolk (Coroners’ Districts) Order 2001 Made---- 26th March 2001 Laid before Parliament 4th April 2001 Coming into force 1st May 2001 Whereas the Council of the County of Suffolk have, in pursuance of section 4(2) of the Coroners Act 1988(a) and after due compliance with the provisions of the Coroners (Orders as to Districts) Rules 1927(b), submitted to the Secretary of State a draft Order providing for the alteration of the existing division of that county into coroners’ districts; Now, therefore, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by section 4(2) of the Act hereby makes the following Order: 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Suffolk (Coroners’ Districts) Order 2001. (2) This Order shall come into force on 1st May 2001. (3) This Order shall not have effect in relation to any inquest begun before the day on which it comes into force or to any post-mortem examination which, before that day, a coroner has directed or requested a medical practitioner to make. 2. The existing Ipswich coroner’s district and West Suffolk coroner’s district (as constituted by the Suffolk (Coroners’ Districts) Order 1984(c)) shall be amalgamated to form a single coroner’s district called the Greater Suffolk Coroner’s District. 3. Accordingly, the County of Suffolk shall be divided into two coroners’ districts and each such coroner’s district shall consist of the area specified in column 2 of the Schedule to this Order opposite to the name of the coroner’s district in question as given in column 1 of that Schedule.
    [Show full text]