Alpha-Glucan, Water Dikinase and the Control of Starch Degradation in Arabidopsis Thaliana Leaves

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alpha-Glucan, Water Dikinase and the Control of Starch Degradation in Arabidopsis Thaliana Leaves Alpha-Glucan, Water Dikinase and the Control of Starch Degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana Leaves Alastair William Skeffington A thesis submitted to the University of East Anglia for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy John Innes Centre Norwich September 2012 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there-from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. i Abstract This thesis examines the role of alpha-glucan, water dikinase (GWD) in the control of starch degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Starch is degraded at night in Arabidopsis leaves to provide carbon for metabolism and growth. The rate of starch degradation is constant through the night and is precisely regulated such that starch reserves last until dawn. Despite the importance of this regulation for normal plant growth, we do not know which enzymes of the pathway are regulated to modulate flux. In this work I focus on the first enzyme in the starch degradation pathway, GWD. This enzyme phosphorylates the starch granule surface, thereby stimulating starch degradation by hydrolytic enzymes. It is hypothesised that GWD is important for the control of starch degradation. GWD shows large diel oscillations in transcript abundance. The enzyme is redox responsive in vitro, and is phosphorylated and SUMOylated in vivo. My work revealed that GWD protein levels are essentially invariant over the diel cycle. Studying plants in which GWD transcript was targeted by inducible RNAi and rapidly decreased to low levels revealed that GWD has half life of 2 days and a very low flux control coefficient for starch degradation. Taken together these findings demonstrate that large diel oscillations in GWD transcript abundance are not important for the daily control of starch degradation. Using transgenic plants in which native GWD was replaced with mutant forms of the enzyme, I demonstrate that redox responsive properties and certain SUMOylation and phosphorylation sites of GWD are not of in vivo relevance for appropriately timed starch degradation. Finally, I identify a previously unknown role for GWD in starch synthesis and find ROC4 to be a novel, putative GWD interaction partner. i Acknowledgements First, a massive thank you to my supervisor, Professor Alison Smith, for her constant enthusiasm: making starch (even more) exciting, for attentive supervision and for staying engaged through the more difficult times, before the projects began to bear fruit. I am grateful to the other members of my supervisory committee, Professor Caroline Dean and Professor Martin Howard for their invaluable advice and direction. I would also like to thank Professor Caroline Dean and Professor Phillip Poole for hosting me in their labs during the rotation year of my PhD. Both rotations were wonderful experiences from which I learnt a lot. Also thanks to Professor Nick Brewin, for his incredible dedication to making the rotation programme as valuable an experience as possible. Dr Sean Murray and Dr Richard Morris kindly gave their time to discuss the more quantitative aspects of this thesis. Their advice was indispensible. I am indebted to Professor Sam Zeeman and Professor Wilhelm Gruissem (ETH, Zurich) for allowing me to work in their labs for a month. While I was there I received help from many people, but would especially like to thank Dr Oliver Kötting, David Seung and Leonie Luginbühl for making me so welcome. Of course, it has been the people I have shared the lab with who have really made the experience over the past three years. In particular, I would like to express my admiration for Dr Marilyn Pike, who posses superhuman patience and irrepressible good cheer. Many thanks also to Doreen Feike, Dr Sam Mugford, Dr Vasilios Andriotis, Dr Cristina Pignocchi, Dr Alistair McCormick, Brendan Fahy, Dr Matilda Crumpton-Taylor, Dr Christian Ruzanski, Dr Sylviane Comparot-Moss, Dr Paul Barratt and Dr Thomas Howard for their help and advice and for making the lab a lovely place to work. Special thanks go to Dr Alex Graf, without whom much of my PhD would not have been possible. The John Innes Centre has been a great place to be a student, and that is down to the people I have shared my time with while here. In particular I would like to thank Ruth ii Bryant, Simon Lloyd, Philippa Borrill as well all the people I have shared 101 City Road with, for their friendship and many happy times. Where would I be without my friends from Cambridge: Natscis and Notscis? Few are privileged to have such a wonderful and close group of friends. Collectively and individually you have been a constant source of strength and joy and I look forward to many more wonderful times together. The last year has not always been easy, and to a large extent I owe my sanity to Wiebke Apel. Thank you so much for your incredible friendship, love and support. I have so many treasured memories of our time together already, and I know we have more wonderful times ahead of us. Finally, but most importantly, I have my family to thank for everything: for their encouragement and support through so many years of education, for their companionship, love and good humour. iii Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................ii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Starch and plant growth ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 The synthesis of the starch granule .................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Starch structure........................................................................................ 5 1.2.2 The enzymes of starch synthesis in chloroplasts................................... 10 1.2.3 The control of starch synthesis .............................................................. 15 1.3 The enzymes of starch degradation .................................................................. 18 1.3.1 Attacking a crystalline granule ............................................................. 20 1.3.2 Degrading the granule ........................................................................... 24 1.3.3 Further metabolism in the stroma ......................................................... 28 1.3.4 The fate of maltose in the cytosol ......................................................... 29 1.4 The control of starch degradation ..................................................................... 30 1.4.1 The initiation of starch degradation ...................................................... 30 1.4.2 Regulation of starch degradation rates .................................................. 33 1.4.2.1 Predicting the time until dawn ............................................................ 36 1.4.2.2 Measuring starch ................................................................................. 37 1.4.2.3 Performing arithmetic division ........................................................... 39 1.5 Regulating the enzymes of starch degradation ................................................. 40 1.5.1 Properties of the genes and enzymes of starch degradation which might be relevant for control of the pathway .................................................. 41 1.5.1.1 Transcriptional regulation ................................................................... 41 1.5.1.2 Redox regulation ................................................................................. 42 1.5.1.3 Other post-translational modifications ............................................... 44 1.5.1.4 Regulation of protein localisation ....................................................... 45 1.5.1.5 Feedback regulation ............................................................................ 46 1.5.1.6 Protein- protein interactions ............................................................... 47 1.5.2 Other evidence pertinent to the regulation of starch degradation ......... 48 1.5.2.1 Evidence for the role of granule phosphorylation in the regulation of starch degradation ............................................................................... 48 1.5.2.2 The requirement for a starch granule .................................................. 49 iv 1.5.2.3 Thermodynamics ................................................................................ 50 1.5.3 AtGWD as a candidate for an enzyme regulated to modulate flux....... 51 1.6 Outline of experimental approach .................................................................... 53 2 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................. 54 2.1 Supplier details ................................................................................................. 54 2.2 Chemicals ......................................................................................................... 55 2.3 Enzymes ........................................................................................................... 55 2.4 Plant material ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Genome Analysis and Classification of Novel Species Flavobacterium Gabrieli
    NOTICE: The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of reproductions of copyrighted material. One specified condition is that the reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses a reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. RESTRICTIONS: This student work may be read, quoted from, cited, for purposes of research. It may not be published in full except by permission of the author. 1 Kirsten Fischer Introduction Microbial Systematics and Taxonomy The diversity of bacteria is truly immense and the discovery of new species and higher taxonomic groups happens quite frequently, as evidenced by the ever expanding tree of life (Hug et al., 2016). The classification of prokaryotes, bacteria especially, is formally regulated by the International Committee on the Systematics of Prokaryotes and has experienced rapid change over the last fifty years. However, some feel that these rules could be even stricter for proper organization of taxonomy (Tindall et al., 2010). Problems occur with the integration of newer methodologies, which creates some challenges for the researcher attempting to publish a novel species. For example, some DNA sequences that are deposited in databases are not accurate (Clarridge, 2004). Taxonomy is an artificial system that works based on the intuition of scientists rather than strict, specific standards (Konstantinidis & Tiedje, 2005). Tindall advocates that a strain shown to be a novel taxon should be characterized “as comprehensively as possible” and abide by the framework established in the Bacteriological Code (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary Materials Figure S1. Differentially abundant spots between the mid-log phase cells grown on xylan or xylose. Red and blue circles denote spots with increased and decreased abundance respectively in the xylan growth condition. The identities of the circled spots are summarized in Table 3. Figure S2. Differentially abundant spots between the stationary phase cells grown on xylan or xylose. Red and blue circles denote spots with increased and decreased abundance respectively in the xylan growth condition. The identities of the circled spots are summarized in Table 4. S2 Table S1. Summary of the non-polysaccharide degrading proteins identified in the B. proteoclasticus cytosol by 2DE/MALDI-TOF. Protein Locus Location Score pI kDa Pep. Cov. Amino Acid Biosynthesis Acetylornithine aminotransferase, ArgD Bpr_I1809 C 1.7 × 10−4 5.1 43.9 11 34% Aspartate/tyrosine/aromatic aminotransferase Bpr_I2631 C 3.0 × 10−14 4.7 43.8 15 46% Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase, Asd Bpr_I1664 C 7.6 × 10−18 5.5 40.1 17 50% Branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase, IlvE Bpr_I1650 C 2.4 × 10−12 5.2 39.2 13 32% Cysteine synthase, CysK Bpr_I1089 C 1.9 × 10−13 5.0 32.3 18 72% Diaminopimelate dehydrogenase Bpr_I0298 C 9.6 × 10−16 5.6 35.8 16 49% Dihydrodipicolinate reductase, DapB Bpr_I2453 C 2.7 × 10−6 4.9 27.0 9 46% Glu/Leu/Phe/Val dehydrogenase Bpr_I2129 C 1.2 × 10−30 5.4 48.6 31 64% Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase Bpr_I1240 C 8.0 × 10−3 4.7 22.5 8 44% glutamine amidotransferase subunit Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, IlvC Bpr_I1657 C 3.8 × 10−16
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary Materials COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSCRIPTOME, PROTEOME AND miRNA PROFILE OF KUPFFER CELLS AND MONOCYTES Andrey Elchaninov1,3*, Anastasiya Lokhonina1,3, Maria Nikitina2, Polina Vishnyakova1,3, Andrey Makarov1, Irina Arutyunyan1, Anastasiya Poltavets1, Evgeniya Kananykhina2, Sergey Kovalchuk4, Evgeny Karpulevich5,6, Galina Bolshakova2, Gennady Sukhikh1, Timur Fatkhudinov2,3 1 Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia 2 Laboratory of Growth and Development, Scientific Research Institute of Human Morphology, Moscow, Russia 3 Histology Department, Medical Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia 4 Laboratory of Bioinformatic methods for Combinatorial Chemistry and Biology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 5 Information Systems Department, Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 6 Genome Engineering Laboratory, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia Figure S1. Flow cytometry analysis of unsorted blood sample. Representative forward, side scattering and histogram are shown. The proportions of negative cells were determined in relation to the isotype controls. The percentages of positive cells are indicated. The blue curve corresponds to the isotype control. Figure S2. Flow cytometry analysis of unsorted liver stromal cells. Representative forward, side scattering and histogram are shown. The proportions of negative cells were determined in relation to the isotype controls. The percentages of positive cells are indicated. The blue curve corresponds to the isotype control. Figure S3. MiRNAs expression analysis in monocytes and Kupffer cells. Full-length of heatmaps are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Methods
    Supplemental Methods: Sample Collection Duplicate surface samples were collected from the Amazon River plume aboard the R/V Knorr in June 2010 (4 52.71’N, 51 21.59’W) during a period of high river discharge. The collection site (Station 10, 4° 52.71’N, 51° 21.59’W; S = 21.0; T = 29.6°C), located ~ 500 Km to the north of the Amazon River mouth, was characterized by the presence of coastal diatoms in the top 8 m of the water column. Sampling was conducted between 0700 and 0900 local time by gently impeller pumping (modified Rule 1800 submersible sump pump) surface water through 10 m of tygon tubing (3 cm) to the ship's deck where it then flowed through a 156 µm mesh into 20 L carboys. In the lab, cells were partitioned into two size fractions by sequential filtration (using a Masterflex peristaltic pump) of the pre-filtered seawater through a 2.0 µm pore-size, 142 mm diameter polycarbonate (PCTE) membrane filter (Sterlitech Corporation, Kent, CWA) and a 0.22 µm pore-size, 142 mm diameter Supor membrane filter (Pall, Port Washington, NY). Metagenomic and non-selective metatranscriptomic analyses were conducted on both pore-size filters; poly(A)-selected (eukaryote-dominated) metatranscriptomic analyses were conducted only on the larger pore-size filter (2.0 µm pore-size). All filters were immediately submerged in RNAlater (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX) in sterile 50 mL conical tubes, incubated at room temperature overnight and then stored at -80oC until extraction. Filtration and stabilization of each sample was completed within 30 min of water collection.
    [Show full text]
  • 1/05661 1 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date _ . ... - 12 May 2011 (12.05.2011) W 2 11/05661 1 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12Q 1/00 (2006.0 1) C12Q 1/48 (2006.0 1) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12Q 1/42 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) Number: International Application DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US20 10/054171 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 26 October 2010 (26.10.2010) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (25) Filing Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (26) Publication Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/255,068 26 October 2009 (26.10.2009) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, MYREXIS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microbiota-Produced N-Formyl Peptide Fmlf Promotes Obesity-Induced Glucose
    Page 1 of 230 Diabetes Title: The microbiota-produced N-formyl peptide fMLF promotes obesity-induced glucose intolerance Joshua Wollam1, Matthew Riopel1, Yong-Jiang Xu1,2, Andrew M. F. Johnson1, Jachelle M. Ofrecio1, Wei Ying1, Dalila El Ouarrat1, Luisa S. Chan3, Andrew W. Han3, Nadir A. Mahmood3, Caitlin N. Ryan3, Yun Sok Lee1, Jeramie D. Watrous1,2, Mahendra D. Chordia4, Dongfeng Pan4, Mohit Jain1,2, Jerrold M. Olefsky1 * Affiliations: 1 Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 3 Second Genome, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA. 4 Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. * Correspondence to: 858-534-2230, [email protected] Word Count: 4749 Figures: 6 Supplemental Figures: 11 Supplemental Tables: 5 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online April 22, 2019 Diabetes Page 2 of 230 ABSTRACT The composition of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and associated metabolites changes dramatically with diet and the development of obesity. Although many correlations have been described, specific mechanistic links between these changes and glucose homeostasis remain to be defined. Here we show that blood and intestinal levels of the microbiota-produced N-formyl peptide, formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF), are elevated in high fat diet (HFD)- induced obese mice. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of the N-formyl peptide receptor Fpr1 leads to increased insulin levels and improved glucose tolerance, dependent upon glucagon- like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Obese Fpr1-knockout (Fpr1-KO) mice also display an altered microbiome, exemplifying the dynamic relationship between host metabolism and microbiota.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Anaerobic Degradation of Benzene and Naphthalene
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt Lehrstuhl für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft Insights into anaerobic degradation of benzene and naphthalene Xiyang Dong Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzende(r): Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Liebl Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Priv.-Doz. Dr. Tillmann Lueders 2. Prof. Dr. Siegfried Scherer 3. Prof. Dr. Rainer Meckenstock Die Dissertation wurde am 03.07.2017 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 18.08.2017 angenommen. 天道酬勤 God rewards those who work hard Abstract Aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g. benzene and naphthalene, have toxic, mutagenic and/or carcinogenic properties. Fortunately, these compounds can be degraded in environmental systems by indigenous microorganisms. Especially under anaerobic conditions, the physiology and ecology of the microbes involved are still poorly understood. In this thesis, important knowledge gaps are addressed in this field using microbiological approaches combined with “omics tools” (metagenomics and metaproteomics). A novel “reverse stable isotope labelling” approach is also introduced to investigate biodegradation activities. Firstly, the enrichment culture BPL was studied, which can degrade benzene coupled with sulfate reduction. It is dominated by an organism of the genus Pelotomaculum. Members of this genus are usually known to be fermenters, undergoing syntrophy with anaerobic respiring microorganisms or methanogens. It remains unclear if Pelotomaculum identified here (namely, Pelotomaculum candidate BPL) could perform both benzene degradation and sulfate reduction. By using a metagenomic approach, a high-quality genome was reconstructed for it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Member of the Polymerase Nucleotidyltransferase Superfamily Is Required for RNA Interference in C. Elegans
    Current Biology, Vol. 15, 378–383, February 22, 2005, ©2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.009 A Member of the Polymerase ␤ Nucleotidyltransferase Superfamily Is Required for RNA Interference in C. elegans Chun-Chieh G. Chen,1 Martin J. Simard,1 described mutant mut-2 (r459) [7], suggesting that Hiroaki Tabara,3 Daniel R. Brownell,1,2 mut-2 and rde-3 are allelic. Finally, we found that a PCR Jennifer A. McCollough,1 and Craig C. Mello1,2,* fragment containing only K04F10.6 rescues the somatic 1Program in Molecular Medicine and RNAi defect of ne3364, confirming that K04F10.6 is rde-3 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Figure 1). University of Massachusetts Medical School rde-3 encodes a conserved protein in the polymerase Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 ␤ nucleotidyltransferase superfamily. RDE-3, and other 3 Graduate School of Medicine members in this family, including conventional poly(A) Horizontal Medical Research Organization (HMRO) polymerases (PAP), 2Ј-5Ј oligoadenylate synthetase Kyoto University (OAS), C. elegans GLD-2, and budding yeast Trf4p, all Kyoto 606-8501 contain a nucleotidyltransferase 2 (NTP transferase 2) Japan domain [5]. In addition, RDE-3 and a subset of family members, including GLD-2 and Trf4p, contain an addi- tional domain, of unknown function, named the PAP/ 25A-associated domain [5]. The rde-3 alleles ne298, Summary r459, and fj14 each contain point mutations predicted to alter conserved amino acids. The ne3370 allele con- RNA interference (RNAi) is an ancient, highly con- tains an in-frame deletion of 423 bp (Figure 1B). ne4243 served mechanism in which small RNA molecules and ne3364 each contain nonsense mutations predicted (siRNAs) guide the sequence-specific silencing of to truncate the protein after 164 and 169 amino acids, gene expression [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Resistance Related Signaling Pathways in the Liver
    INSULIN RESISTANCE RELATED SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN THE LIVER by Yuchun Wang A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Baltimore, Maryland May, 2020 © 2020 Yuchun Wang All rights reserved Abstract Over the past 20 years, the worldwide toll of diabetes has tripled to more than 400 million, which makes it one of the fastest-growing health challenges of the 21st century. There are three main categories of diabetes: type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes mellitus. Among them, Type 2 diabetes(T2D) makes up to 90% of diabetes worldwide. Hyper- glycemia can be effectively controlled by giving insulin injection for type 1 and gestational diabetes mellitus. However, because insulin resistance is one of the causes of T2D, those with T2D do not respond as well to insulin as those with T1D or gestational diabetes. Fur- thermore, our lack of knowledge about the underlying physiology of T2D makes it difficult to find reliable treatments. While high blood glucose concentration is one of the major symptoms of T2D, changes in lipid metabolism are characteristic of insulin resistance(IR). In the human body, the liver plays a major role in glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Hence, this essay pro- vides an overview of signaling pathways in the liver and presents their interrelationship to better understand the underlying IR mechanism. Primary Reader and Advisor: Marc D. Donohue Secondary Reader: Gregory Aranovich ii Acknowledgements I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Professor Marc D. Donohue, for introducing me to the fantastic world of science, and for his patient guidance along the road of my Master’s study.
    [Show full text]
  • Uridylation of Mature Mirnas and Sirnas by the MUT68 Nucleotidyltransferase Promotes Their Degradation in Chlamydomonas
    Uridylation of mature miRNAs and siRNAs by the MUT68 nucleotidyltransferase promotes their degradation in Chlamydomonas Fadia Ibrahima,1, Linda A. Rymarquisb,1, Eun-Jeong Kima, James Beckera, Eniko Balassaa, Pamela J. Greenb, and Heriberto Ceruttia,2 aSchool of Biological Sciences and Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588; and bDelaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711 Edited by James C. Carrington, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, and approved December 8, 2009 (received for review November 2, 2009) Regulation of gene expression by small RNAs (∼20–30 nucleotides in 9). Activated RISC uses the remaining single-stranded siRNA as a length) plays an essential role in developmental pathways and guide to identify homologous RNAs, ultimately triggering tran- defense responses against genomic parasites in eukaryotes. Micro- script degradation and/or translation repression (1–3). RNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) commonly The biogenesis and the mode of action of sRNAs have direct the inactivation of cognate sequences through a variety of attracted great attention (1–3, 10), but much less is known about mechanisms, including RNA degradation, translation inhibition, and mechanisms of miRNA/siRNA turnover and their role in small transcriptional repression. Recent studies have provided consider- RNA function. Degradation of mature miRNAs in Caeno- able insight into the biogenesis and the mode of action of miRNAs rhabditis elegans, mediated by the 5′-to-3′ exoribonuclease and siRNAs. However, relatively little is known about mechanisms XRN2, has recently been shown to modulate miRNA accumu- of quality control and small RNA decay in RNA interference (RNAi) lation in vivo (11).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0091454 A1 Diber Et Al
    US 2011 0091454A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0091454 A1 Diber et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 21, 2011 (54) METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR Beck, Kfar Saba (IL); Wei-Yong ANNOTATING BOMOLECULAR Zhu, Plainsboro, NJ (US); Alon SEQUENCES Wasserman, New York, NY (US); Chen Chermesh, Mishmar (76) Inventors: Alex Diber, Rishon-LeZion (IL); HaShiva (IL); Idit Azar, Tel-Aviv Sarah Pollock, Tel-Aviv (IL); Zurit (IL); Rotem Sorek, Rechovot (IL); Levine, Herzlia (IL); Sergey Jeanne Bernstein, Kfar Yona (IL) Nemzer, RaAnana (IL); Vladimir Grebinskiy, Highland Park, NJ (21) Appl. No.: 12/701,651 (US); Brian Meloon, Plainsboro, NJ (US); Andrew Olson, (22) Filed: Feb. 8, 2010 Northport, NY (US): Avi Related U.S. Application Data Rosenberg, Kfar Saba (IL); Ami Haviv, Hod-HaSharon (IL); Shaul (63) Continuation of application No. 11/043,860, filed on Zevin, Mevaseret Zion (IL); Tomer Jan. 27, 2005. Zekharia, Givataim (IL); Zipi (60) Provisional application No. 60/539,129, filed on Jan. Shaked, Tel-Aviv (IL); Moshe 27, 2004. Olshansky, Haifa (IL); Ariel Farkash, Haifa (IL); Eyal Publication Classification Privman, Tel-Aviv (IL); Amit (51) Int. Cl. Novik, Beit-YeHoshua (IL); Naomi A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) Keren, Givat Shmuel (IL); Gad S. C07K 6/00 (2006.01) Cojocaru, Ramat-HaSharon (IL); GOIN 33/53 (2006.01) Pinch as Akiva, Ramat-Gan (IL); Yossi Cohen, Woking (GB); Ronen A6IP35/00 (2006.01) Shemesh, Modiin (IL); Osnat (52) U.S. Cl. ................ 424/133.1: 530/387.9; 424/139.1; Sella-Tavor, Kfar-Kish (IL); Liat 530/387.3; 436/501 Mintz, East Brunswick, NJ (US); (57) ABSTRACT Hanging Xie, Lambertville, NJ (US); Dvir Dahary, Tel-Aviv (IL); Polypeptide sequences and polynucleotide sequences are Erez.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Isozymes in Cancer1
    Cancer Research VOLUME31 NOVEMBER 1971 NUMBER11 [CANCER RESEARCH 31, 1523-1542, November 1971] A Review of Isozymes in Cancer1 Wayne E. Criss Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32601 TABLE OF CONTENTS postulated role for that particular isozymic system in cellular metabolism. Summary 1523 Introduction 1523 Normal enzyme differentiation 1523 INTRODUCTION Tumor enzyme differentiation 1524 Isozymes 1524 Normal Enzyme Differentiation DNA polymerase 1524 Enzyme differentiation is the process whereby, during the Hexokinase 1525 Fructose 1,6-diphosphatase 1525 development of an organ in an animal, the organ acquires the quantitative and qualitative adult enzyme patterns (122). Key Aldolase 1526 pathway enzymes in several metabolic processes have been Pyruvate kinase 1527 found to undergo enzymatic differentiation. The enzymes Láclatedehydrogenase 1527 Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1527 involved in nitrogen metabolism, and also in urea cycle Malate dehydrogenase 1528 metabolism (180), are tyrosine aminotransferase (123, 151, Glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase 1529 330, 410), tryptophan pyrrolase (261), serine dehydratase Glutaminase 1529 (123, 410), histidine ammonia lyase (11), and aspartate Aspartate aminotransferase 1530 aminotransferase (337, 388). The enzymes involved in nucleic Adenylate kinase 1531 acid metabolism are DNA polymerase (156, 277) and RNase (52). In glycolysis the enzymes are hexokinase-glucokinase Carbamyl phosphate synthetase 1531 Lactose synthetase 1533 (98, 389), galactokinase 30, aldolase (267, 315), pyruvate Discussion 1533 kinase (73, 386), and lactate dehydrogenase (67, 69). In References 1533 mitochondrial oxidation they are NADH oxidase, succinic oxidase, a-glycero-P oxidase, ATPase, cytochrome oxidase, and flavin content (84, 296). In glycogen metabolism the SUMMARY enzymes involved are UDPG pyrophosphorylase and UDPG glucosyltransferase (19).
    [Show full text]