Information Disclosure on Air Transport Services （The 3Rd Quarter in FY2013）

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

輸送人キロあたり旅客収入、路線別輸送実績等 March 24, 2014 Civil Aviation Bureau Information Disclosure on Air Transport Services （The 3rd quarter in FY2013） Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) discloses information on air transport services on a regular basis based on the policy described below so that air passengers can have free choice to select right air transport services with self-responsibility. Accordingly, we compiled data from October to December in FY2013 based on the information provided by the specified Japanese air transport service providers, and please see below for details. Outline １．Airlines covered under this policy ・”A Specified Japanese Air Transport Service Provider” ※： shall provide data by quarter ※The following “Specified Japanese Air Transport Service Providers” which run air transport services using aircraft having over 100 passenger seats or a maximum take-off weight over 50,000 kilograms. Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. (JAL, J-AIR and JAL EXPRESS), All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. (ANA and ANA WINGS CO., LTD.）, Japan Transocean Air Co., Ltd, Skymark Airlines Inc., AIRDO Co., Ltd, Skynet Asia Airways Co., Ltd, Star Flyer Inc. , Peach Aviation Ltd., Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd., and Vanilla Air Inc. ・”A Domestic Scheduled Air Transport Service Providers” other than “A Specified Japanese Air Transport Service Provider”： shall provide data twice a year for the 1st half (Apr-Sept.) & 2nd half ( Oct-Mar.) ２．Disclosed Items ・Comparison information on air transport services On-time performance rating, number of flight delays and number of cancelled flights ・Information on airfares Passenger revenue per RPK (revenue passenger mile) and number of passengers by flight route ・Information on the “Flex Traveler System” ・Airfare pricing trends ・PBB (passenger boarding bridge) use rate .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
- www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
[Show full text]
ANA and NCA Agree to a Strategic Business Partnership ~To Continue Contributing to Japan’S Economic Development ~
ANA and NCA Agree to a Strategic Business Partnership ~To continue contributing to Japan’s economic development ~ TOKYO, March 1, 2018 – All Nippon Airways (ANA) and Nippon Cargo Airlines (NCA) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enhance both, the service and the corporate value of the two airlines by building a strategic business partnership. The three key elements of this partnership which will give added value to ANA’s and NCA’s customers, and will provide them with seamless logistics experiences are: 1. Code Share Within the first half of the fiscal year 2018, ANA and NCA plan to add codeshares to each other’s flights(*). The codeshares will offer a broad network of flights and a wider range of choices to the partner’s customers, allowing seamless and convenient connections with outstanding Japan-quality service, and especially leveraging the synergy effect of ANA’s Boeing 767 operation to China and Asia, and NCA’s Boeing 747 freighter operation to North America and Europe. ANA’s plans to introduce Boeing 777 freighters will further increase the customer choice. 2. Block Space Through this partnership, the two airlines plan to expand the existing interline and block space agreement, with the aim to effectively utilize each other’s cargo space and provide a reliable and convenient connection service. 3. Maintenance Support Finally, the MOU includes a maintenance support agreement, by which ANA will allocate maintenance resources to support NCA’s operation. The agreement will enable active sharing of knowledge and enhancement of the technical abilities of both carriers. With this new partnership, ANA and NCA hope to provide their customers access to a large global freight network, highest quality of service, and convenient and flexible choices, responding to the growing demand.
[Show full text]
Years Years Service Or 20,000 Hours of Flying
VOL. 9 NO. 1 OCTOBER 2001 MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ASIA PACIFIC AIRLINES 50 50YEARSYEARS Japan Airlines celebrating a golden anniversary AnsettAnsett R.I.PR.I.P.?.? Asia-PacificAsia-Pacific FleetFleet CensusCensus UPDAUPDATETE U.S.U.S. terrterroror attacks:attacks: heavyheavy economiceconomic fall-outfall-out forfor Asia’Asia’ss airlinesairlines VOL. 9 NO. 1 OCTOBER 2001 COVER STORY N E W S Politics still rules at Thai Airways International 8 50 China Airlines clinches historic cross strait deal 8 Court rules 1998 PAL pilots’ strike illegal 8 YEARS Page 24 Singapore Airlines pulls out of Air India bid 10 Air NZ suffers largest corporate loss in New Zealand history 12 Japan Airlines’ Ansett R.I.P.? Is there any way back? 22 golden anniversary Real-time IFE race hots up 32 M A I N S T O R Y VOL. 9 NO. 1 OCTOBER 2001 Heavy economic fall-out for Asian carriers after U.S. terror attacks 16 MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ASIA PACIFIC AIRLINES HELICOPTERS 50 Flying in the face of bureaucracy 34 50YEARS Japan Airlines celebrating a FEATURE golden anniversary Training Cathay Pacific Airways’ captains of tomorrow 36 Ansett R.I.P.?.? Asia-Pacific Fleet Census UPDATE S P E C I A L R E P O R T Asia-Pacific Fleet Census UPDATE 40 U.S. terror attacks: heavy economic fall-out for Asia’s airlines Photo: Mark Wagner/aviation-images.com C O M M E N T Turbulence by Tom Ballantyne 58 R E G U L A R F E A T U R E S Publisher’s Letter 5 Perspective 6 Business Digest 51 PUBLISHER Wilson Press Ltd Photographers South East Asia Association of Asia Pacific Airlines GPO Box 11435 Hong Kong Andrew Hunt (chief photographer), Tankayhui Media Secretariat Tel: Editorial (852) 2893 3676 Rob Finlayson, Hiro Murai Tan Kay Hui Suite 9.01, 9/F, Tel: (65) 9790 6090 Kompleks Antarabangsa, Fax: Editorial (852) 2892 2846 Design & Production Fax: (65) 299 2262 Jalan Sultan Ismail, E-mail: [email protected] Ü Design + Production Web Site: www.orientaviation.com E-mail: [email protected] 50250 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
[Show full text]
Analysis of the Effects of Air Transport Liberalisation on the Domestic Market in Japan
Chikage Miyoshi Analysis Of The Effects Of Air Transport Liberalisation On The Domestic Market In Japan COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS PhD Thesis COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS PhD Thesis Academic year 2006-2007 Chikage Miyoshi Analysis of the effects of air transport liberalisation on the domestic market in Japan Supervisor: Dr. G. Williams May 2007 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Cranfield University 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner Abstract This study aims to demonstrate the different experiences in the Japanese domestic air transport market compared to those of the intra-EU market as a result of liberalisation along with the Slot allocations from 1997 to 2005 at Haneda (Tokyo international) airport and to identify the constraints for air transport liberalisation in Japan. The main contribution of this study is the identification of the structure of deregulated air transport market during the process of liberalisation using qualitative and quantitative techniques and the provision of an analytical approach to explain the constraints for liberalisation. Moreover, this research is considered original because the results of air transport liberalisation in Japan are verified and confirmed by Structural Equation Modelling, demonstrating the importance of each factor which affects the market. The Tokyo domestic routes were investigated as a major market in Japan in order to analyse the effects of liberalisation of air transport. The Tokyo routes market has seven prominent characteristics as follows: (1) high volume of demand, (2) influence of slots, (3) different features of each market category, (4) relatively low load factors, (5) significant market seasonality, (6) competition with high speed rail, and (7) high fares in the market.
[Show full text]
Worldwide Direct Flights File
LCCs: On the verge of making it big in Japan? LCCs: On the verge of making it big in Japan? The announcement that AirAsia plans a return to the Japanese market in 2015 is symptomatic of the changes taking place in Japanese aviation. Low cost carriers (LCCs) have been growing rapidly, stealing market share from the full service carriers (FSCs), and some airports are creating terminals to handle this new type of traffic. After initial scepticism that the Japanese traveller would accept a low cost model in the air, can the same be said for low cost terminals? In this article we look at the evolution of LCCs in Japan and ask what the planners need to be considering now in order to accommodate tomorrow’s airlines. Looking back decades Japan was unusual in Asia in that it fostered competition between national carriers, allowing both ANA and Japan Airlines to create strong market positions. As elsewhere, though, competition is regulated and domestic carriers favoured. While low cost carriers (LCCs) have been given room to breathe in Japan their access to some of the major airports has been restricted, albeit by a lack of slot availability at airports such as Tokyo’s Haneda International Airport. The fostering of a truly competitive Japanese aviation market requires the opportunity for LCCs to thrive and that almost certainly means new airport infrastructure to deliver those much needed slots. State of play In comparison to the wider Asian region, LCCs in Japan are still some way from reaching comparable levels of market share. In October 2014, LCCs accounted for 26% of scheduled airline capacity within Asia; in Japan they have just reached a 17% share of domestic seats and have yet to gain a strong foothold in the international market, with just 9% of seats, or 7.5 million seats annually.
[Show full text]
What Role for Offsetting Aviation Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Deep-Cut Carbon World?
Journal of Air Transport Management 63 (2017) 71e83 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Air Transport Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jairtraman What role for offsetting aviation greenhouse gas emissions in a deep-cut carbon world? * Prof Susanne Becken a, , Prof Brendan Mackey b a Griffith Institute for Tourism, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia b Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia article info abstract Article history: The long-term goal of containing average warming below the 2 C limit requires deep cuts in emissions Received 29 June 2016 from all sectors. The fast growing global aviation industry has committed to reduce carbon emissions. Received in revised form Carbon offsetting is an integral element of the sector's strategy. Already, airlines offer voluntary carbon 29 May 2017 offsetting to those customers who wish to mitigate the impact of their travel. To ensure carbon offsetting Accepted 29 May 2017 can make a meaningful and credible contribution, this paper first discusses the science behind ‘carbon Available online 7 June 2017 offsetting’, followed by the associated policy perspective. Then, against the context of different aviation emissions pathways, the paper provides empirical evidence of current airline practices in relation to Keywords: Carbon offset offsetting mechanisms and communication. Building on these insights, the challenges of reducing Emissions pathway aviation emissions and using carbon credits to compensate for ongoing growth are discussed. The paper Carbon budget concludes by proposing five principles of best practice for carbon offsetting that airlines can use as a basis Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations to develop credible emissions strategies, and that could inform the sectoral framework currently being Airlines developed by leading aviation organisations.
[Show full text]
Monthly OTP November 2019
Monthly OTP November 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This may result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG, please email [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – November 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size JH Fuji Dream Airlines 96.5% 1 2,340 155 3H Air Inuit 37.2% 162 1,465 196 GA Garuda Indonesia 95.8% 2 12,736 48 AI Air India 40.1% 161 16,509 38 RC Atlantic Airways Faroe Islands 95.0% 3 210 295 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc. 50.3% 160 905 225 7G Star Flyer 94.0% 4 2,160 164 WO Swoop 53.4% 159 919 222 EW Eurowings 93.4% 5 15,608 40 SG SpiceJet 54.3% 158 18,288 33 SATA International-Azores 6J Solaseed 93.3% 6 2,226 161 S4 54.5% 157 448 260 Airlines S.A. XQ SunExpress 93.3% 7 3,115 135 IW Wings Air 54.7% 156 11,242 55 TA TACA International Airlines 92.8% 8 374 272 JY Intercaribbean Airways Ltd 56.1% 155 1,760 184 FA Safair 92.6% 9 2,250 159 JT Lion Air 58.0% 154 17,320 34 B7 Uni Airways 92.5% 10 4,132 123 BJ Nouvelair
[Show full text]
Nippon Airways Co., Ltd
PROSPECTUS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. Admission of 537,500,000 Shares of Common Stock to the Official List of the UK Listing Authority (the “Official List”), and to trading on the Main Market (the “Market”) of the London Stock Exchange plc (the “London Stock Exchange”) The date of this Prospectus is July 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary ...................................................................... 1 Risk Factors .................................................................... 5 Admission to Listing .............................................................. 17 Enforcement of Liabilities .......................................................... 17 Available Information ............................................................. 17 Forward-looking Statements ........................................................ 18 Presentation of Financial and Other Information.......................................... 19 Glossary ....................................................................... 20 Information Concerning Our Common Stock ............................................ 21 Exchange Rates ................................................................. 23 Capitalization and Indebtedness ...................................................... 24 Selected Consolidated Financial Data and Other Information ................................ 26 Operating and Financial Review ..................................................... 29 Business ......................................................................
[Show full text]
Case of Airline Services
Political Economy of Competition Policy in Japan: Case of Airline Services Takatoshi ITO Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, and The Faculty of Economics, the University of Tokyo November 20, 2003 ************* For conference “How Should Competition Policy Transform Itself? Designing the New Competition Policy 1. Introduction The Airline services industry in Japan has gone through gradual, but cumulatively tremendous changes in the last fifteen years. Before 1986, routes were controlled by regulation: international routes were served by Japan Airlines (JAL) only; domestic major routes were served by JAL and All Nippon Airlines (ANA); and domestic local routes were served by ANA and Japan Air System (JAS). Airfares were also tightly regulated: airfares were approximately proportional to the distance of the route; no discount airfares but round-trip discounts and multiple-coupon discounts. New entries to passenger service were not allowed or not even attempted.1 1 See Ito, Takatoshi (1992). Shohisha Jushi no Keizaigaku (trans. “Consumer-oriented Economics”), Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbun sha, for comparing the deregulated US and regulated Japan in the 1980s in the pricing and other characteristics of the airline industry. See also Ito, Takatoshi and Hirotaka Yamauchi, (1996). “Air Transport Policy in Japan,” in G. Huffbauer and C. Findlay (eds) Flying High, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International 1 However, in 2003, airfares are as diverse as those in the US market. Although regular fares are still proportional to distance, availability of discount airfares depends on the season, day of the week, time of the day, advance ticketing, birthday of a passenger, and, most importantly, competitive pressure of the route.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2015
Corporate Prole WE SUPPORT AVIATION INDUSTRY Corporate Name: Airport Facilities Co., Ltd. (AFC) Main Banks: Development Bank of Japan Established: February 1970 Resona Bank Capital: 6,826.10 million yen Mizuho Bank Employees: 111 (Consolidated as of March 31, 2015) The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Stock Information (as of March 31, 2015 ) Stock Listings: Major Shareholders Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) 1st Section Number of Shares Ratio of Shareholder (Ticker Code: 8864 ) Owned (thousands) Shareholding (%) Total Number of Shares Authorized: Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. 10,521 19.16 124,800,000 ANA HOLDINGS INC. 10,521 19.16 Total Number of Shares Issued: Development Bank of Japan Inc. 6,920 12.60 54,903,750 KOKUSAI KOGYO HOLDINGS CO., LTD. 1,939 3.53 Number of Shareholders: RBC ISB A / C DUB NON RESIDENT - TREATY RATE 1,730 3.15 6,905 ANNUAL REPORT 2015 Year Ended March 31, 2015 Composition of Shareholders Stock Price and Trading Volume (Monthly) (¥) Stock price 900 Securities The Company (Treasury Stock) Companies 5.91% 0.87% 600 Individuals Foreign Investors 15.79% 300 12.64% 0 ’14/4 ’14/5 ’14/6 ’14/7 ’14/8 ’14/9 ’14/10 ’14/11 ’14/12 ’15/1 ’15/2 ’15/3 (Thousand shares) Trading volume Financial Institutions 2,000 Other Japanese 20.13% 1,500 Corporations 1,000 44.66% 500 0 AIRPORT FACILITIES CO., LTD. Sogo Building No. 5, 1-6-5 Haneda Airport, Ota-ku, Tokyo 144-0041 TEL: 81-3-3747-0251 FAX: 81-3-3747-0225 WWW.afc.jp/english/ AIRPORT FACILITIES CO., LTD.
[Show full text]
Scoot Network and Interline Destinations
SCOOT NETWORK HARBIN SAPPORO BEIJING SHENYANG TIANJIN DALIAN JINAN SEOUL QINGDAO TOKYO, NARITA ZHENGZHOU OSAKA XI’AN HIROSHIMA TOKYO, HANEDA FUKUOKA NAGOYA CHENGDU NANJING WUHAN SHANGHAI AMRITSAR CHONGQING WUXI / SUZHOU HANGZHOU NINGBO KATHMANDU NEW DELHI NANCHANG LUCKNOW CHANGSHA FUZHOU DHAKA KUNMING QUANZHOU GUANGZHOU XIAMEN TAIPEI AHMEDABAD NANNING SHENZHEN KOLKATA HANOI KAOHSIUNG MANDALAY MACAU HONG KONG LUANG PRABANG HAIKOU MUMBAI VISAKHAPATNAM CHIANG MAI HYDERABAD YANGON VIENTIANE CLARK DANANG BANGKOK MANILA SIEM REAP BENGALURU CHENNAI PHNOM PENH BORACAY COIMBATORE TIRUCHIRAPPALLI HO CHI MINH CITY KALIBO CEBU KOCHI KOH SAMUI PHUKET TRIVANDRUM KRABI COLOMBO DAVAO LANGKAWI HAT YAI KOTA KINABALU PENANG BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN IPOH KUANTAN KUALA LUMPUR MEDAN KUCHING MANADO PEKANBARU SINGAPORE BALIKPAPAN PALEMBANG MAKASSAR JAKARTA SEMARANG MALDIVES BANDUNG SURABAYA LOMBOK YOGYAKARTA BALI DARWIN CAIRNS BRISBANE GOLD COAST PERTH SYDNEY CANBERRA ADELAIDE AUCKLAND MELBOURNE WELLINGTON CHRISTCHURCH Scoot Base Flights operated by Scoot Flights operated by Scoot and Singapore Airlines / SilkAir Flights operated by Singapore Airlines / SilkAir SCOOT NETWORK AMERICA AFRICA EUROPE STOCKHOLM MOSCOW COPENHAGEN NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO AMSTERDAM BERLIN MANCHESTER DÜSSELDORF LOS ANGELES JOHANNESBURG HEATHROW FRANKFURT PARIS HOUSTON MUNICH ZURICH HONOLULU MILAN FIUMICINO BARCELONA ISTANBUL CAPE TOWN ATHENS SAUDI ARABIA OPERATED BY NOKSCOOT OPERATED BY VANILLA AIR HAKODATE SHENYANG TIANJIN DALIAN DUBAI QINGDAO NANJING JEDDAH TAIPEI AMAMI NAHA *FROM BANGKOK
[Show full text]
Asia-Pacific Low-Cost Carriers Ranked by Fleet Size As of Dec
Asia-Pacific Low-cost Carriers Ranked by Fleet Size as of Dec. 31, 2013 No. of Rank Carrier Country LCC Group Aircraft 1 JT Lion Air Indonesia Lion 94^^ 2 AK AirAsia Malaysia AirAsia 74 3 JQ Jetstar Airways Australia Jetstar 74 4 6E IndiGo India (independent) 73 5 SG SpiceJet India (independent) 56 6 5J Cebu Pacific Air Philippines (independent) 48 7 9C Spring Airlines China Spring* 39 8 FD Thai AirAsia Thailand AirAsia 35 9 BC Skymark Airlines Japan (independent) 33 10 QZ Indonesia AirAsia Indonesia AirAsia 30 11 IW Wings Air Indonesia Lion 27 12 TR Tigerair Singapore Tigerair 25 13 QG Citilink Indonesia (Garuda) 24 14 OX Orient Thai Airlines Thailand (independent) 22 15 DD Nok Air Thailand Nok* 21** 16 IX Air India Express India (Air India) 21 17 3K Jetstar Asia Vietnam Jetstar 19^ 18 D7 AirAsia X Malaysia AirAsia X* 18 19 GK Jetstar Japan Japan Jetstar 18 20 G8 GoAir India (independent) 17 21 8L Lucky Air China (Hainan Airlines) 17 22 7C Jeju Air South Korea (independent) 13 23 Z2 Zest Air Philippines AirAsia 13 24 S2 JetLite India (Jet Airways Airlines) 13 25 PN West Air China (Hainan Airlines) 13 26 HD Air Do Japan (independent) 13 27 TT Tigerair Australia Australia Tigerair 12 28 LQ Solaseed Japan (independent) 12 29 MM Peach Japan (All Nippon Airways) 11 30 BX Air Busan South Korea (Asiana Airlines) 11 31 7G Star Flyer Japan (independent) 11 32 VJ VietJet Air Vietnam VietJet* 10 33 OD Malindo Air Malaysia Lion 10 34 LJ Jin Air South Korea (Korean Air) 10 35 RI Tigerair Mandala Indonesia Tigerair 9 36 ZE Eastar Jet South Korea (independent)
[Show full text]