DOCSLIB.ORG

Orthodox/Catholic Week 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orthodox/Catholic Week 1 Week 1 Christianity’s Family Tree What Other Christians Believe and Why By Adam Hamilton Important Quick Facts: ● Orthodox= oldest baby in Christianity family tree ● Christianity sprang from Judaism ● As Christianity began to bring on more and more non-Jewish elements they became known as the Nazarenes, followers of Jesus of Nazareth, as followers of "the Way", or simply "Christians" followers of Jesus Christ Beginnings of Christianity During the first century of Christianity, denominations did not exist as we have them today. As time went on arguments over theology and practice started plaguing the church. This led to leaders calling together bishops from all over the world to work out the issues and figure out the essentials of the faith we share. This meeting took place in 325 AD in the city of Nicaea. The statement of faith that came from this meeting is called the Nicene Creed. Now the creed as we know it today includes major additions that were made at another council in 381 AD in Constantinople which is why it is sometimes called the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed. Despite the unity of belief with the Creed, differences kept rising between Christians in the Eastern and Western halves of the Roman Empire. The Empire was being torn apart by these clashes of culture, philosophy, and politics, not so much theology. Emperor Constantine, the man who had reunited the empire, appointed his sons to rule after his death. One ruled from the Latin-speaking traditional capital of Rome and was trying to ward off the continuing invasions of barbarians. While the other ruled in the Greek-speaking east from the capital Constantinople which was considered the new Rome. Now Christians in the West tended to view the gospel in concrete terms with juridical models of sin and justice as keys to its understanding. While Christians in the east tended to allow for more mystery in their view of the gospel. Through the centuries contact between the East and the West lessened and the Gulf between them widened. Questions arose regarding the relationship of the four major leaders of the Christian churches in the East who were known as the patriarchs and the prince among leaders in the West known as the pope. The patriarchs recognized the pope's status as first among equals but they did not believe he had authority over their churches. Things came to a head in the seventh century at a regional council in Toledo, Spain. Western Christians decided to add three simple words to the Nicene Creed without any consultation with Eastern Christians. These words called the "filioque" (Latin for "from the Son") stated that the Holy Spirit did not only proceed from the Father, which was agreed upon, but also from the Son. The Eastern Christians were appalled by this addition and conflicts continued for centuries between the two halves until 1054 when Pope Leo X and Patriarch Michael I excommunicated each other and ALL the other's followers from the church. This created a breach that has lasted until this very day. Can you guess what the East and Western halves turned into? This, leads us to the two denominations we will look into today Orthodoxy and Catholicism. Both these churches see the church's history in slightly different ways. Orthodox Christians believe they are the direct and continuous successors of the apostles. So since the Roman Catholic Church added to the creed, giving too much power to the pope, and changing liturgy they have departed from the right path. Orthodox Church The Eastern Christians claimed the title "Orthodox" which means "right worship" and "right doctrine". By claiming this name Eastern Christians took a strong stance in claiming to have the right forms of worship and doctrine while implicating that Western Christians do not. If Eastern Christians are the Orthodox church then all other Christians are not Orthodox. So what about the rest of us? Today it is more common for Orthodox Christians to believe that-What God chooses to do with non-Orthodox followers of Jesus is up to God-but they are still committed to their assertion that they are the true church. Currently, Eastern Christianity makes up the second largest body of Christians behind...Roman Catholics. Members continue to be largely located in the East with the largest number of Orthodox Christians being found in Russia. Within Eastern, Orthodoxy divisions are mostly ethnic with Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, and Syrian Orthodox to name a few. This prince of the creeds is the same in the Roman Catholic and mainline Protestant churches with the exception of the statement on the Holy Spirit. Besides that, the essentials of the faith are agreed upon by the majority of Christians. Another difference that has come from the split is the Orthodox teaching that the human condition is not tied to the doctrine of original sin that Adam and Eve's sin is now passed to all humankind. They believe that what is passed on is death and all that it brings. As a result, humanity was placed in the grip of death and the devil until Jesus gave his life as a ransom for all humanity. Human beings, once they accept this gift, begin the lifelong journey toward becoming like God. The Orthodox Church believes that Christian life begins at baptism and until you are baptized you are outside the church. Baptism in the church is done by immersion with even infants being completely immersed in water. Then you are anointed with oil (chrismation) immediately following the baptism. This takes the place of confirmation in the church. An important part of understanding Orthodoxy is understanding the role of the Fathers in the church and scripture. The church believes that the Holy Spirit was guiding the early church and therefore the Christians of the first five centuries were very important interpreters of the Scriptures. These writings function in some ways like the Mishnah and Talmud function in Judaism. The Protestant idea of scripture alone or "sola scriptura" is unheard of in Orthodox tradition. To them, scripture is the primary basis of authority in the faith but it needs to be interpreted with the help of the holy spirit and the wisdom of the church through the ages. The first of these writings came from AD 96 with the First Letter of Clement and continued for centuries. These writings tell the stories of saints and icons through this period but it is important to note Orthodox Christians do not worship these figures but look to them for faithful inspiration. In the church, the real world is heaven and not here on Earth. Our lives here on Earth are not the real world but a place we spend a small amount of time on. This inspires an Orthodox church building whose purpose is to transport the worshipper to the heavenly realm. CATHOLIC CHURCH Catholics make up the largest group of Christians in the world with over 1 billion people. In the United States though Protestants outnumber Catholics two to one. The word catholic means “universal” and it was used to describe the church for a time. As mentioned above the Christian church officially split in 1054 because according to the Orthodox church it was believed to be the true church of the apostles. Now, this may surprise you but the Roman Catholic Church believes they are the true church of the apostles and Orthodox and Protestants have broken off from them. Similar to the Orthodox church though they believe the Holy Spirit did not cease to guide the church after the death of the apostles but continued through bishops, theologians, and church councils. This is where the relationship between Catholics and Protestants gets murky. With some of their practices and doctrines being difficult for Protestants to see in the scripture. Catholics argue that there are “seeds” of these doctrines in the scripture but the harder they are to find the less likely Protestants are to accept them. The life and resurrection of Jesus were passed down orally until the Council of Rome in 382 when the books of the New Testament were clearly defined. It was bishops of the church, guided by the Holy Spirit, that decided what would be the New Testament of the Bible. Without them, the Bible would look very different as we have it today. A major differing factor between Catholics and Protestants is the teaching of Mary. Protestants affirm that the New Testament is where we find the story of Mary and honor her as the mother of our Lord. Catholics start in the New Testament but also look at traditions and theological arguments that developed around Mary through the centuries. This led to doctrines Protestants do not accept which are; that she was immaculately conceived, was perpetually a virgin, and assumed into heaven at her death. Protestants do not find enough evidence to support these doctrines as the Catholics have. What we can learn from Catholic beliefs and rituals: Rosary The rosary is a tool to recount the stories of Jesus and Mary while offering spiritual words of affirmation and prayer. While Protestants may reject the couple portions of the rosary dedicated to extra-biblical stories and the repeating words of affirmation to Mary it’s such a fascinating idea of using this tool daily to worship, pray, and recount Gospel stories. It isn’t too different from what we do at any church event. The Eucharist At his last Passover meal with his disciples, Jesus broke bread and gave thanks for it which gave a new meaning to the Passover meal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconstruction Or Reformation the Conciliar Papacy and Jan Hus of Bohemia
    Garcia 1 RECONSTRUCTION OR REFORMATION THE CONCILIAR PAPACY AND JAN HUS OF BOHEMIA Franky Garcia HY 490 Dr. Andy Dunar 15 March 2012 Garcia 2 The declining institution of the Church quashed the Hussite Heresy through a radical self-reconstruction led by the conciliar reformers. The Roman Church of the late Middle Ages was in a state of decline after years of dealing with heresy. While the Papacy had grown in power through the Middle Ages, after it fought the crusades it lost its authority over the temporal leaders in Europe. Once there was no papal banner for troops to march behind to faraway lands, European rulers began fighting among themselves. This led to the Great Schism of 1378, in which different rulers in Europe elected different popes. Before the schism ended in 1417, there were three popes holding support from various European monarchs. Thus, when a new reform movement led by Jan Hus of Bohemia arose at the beginning of the fifteenth century, the declining Church was at odds over how to deal with it. The Church had been able to deal ecumenically (or in a religiously unified way) with reforms in the past, but its weakened state after the crusades made ecumenism too great a risk. Instead, the Church took a repressive approach to the situation. Bohemia was a land stained with a history of heresy, and to let Hus's reform go unchecked might allow for a heretical movement on a scale that surpassed even the Cathars of southern France. Therefore the Church, under guidance of Pope John XXIII and Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund of Luxemburg, convened in the Council of Constance in 1414.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
    The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Catholic Bible – Part I the Anti‐Catholic Bible
    The Anti-Catholic Bible – Part I The Anti‐Catholic Bible Loraine Boettner was a member of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church in the first part of the 20th century – and an anti‐Catholic of the highest order. In 1962, he wrote a book called “Roman Catholicism”, which quickly became THE authoritative source for Protestant clergy regarding all things Catholic. The problem is that MOST of it is simply false. The following list of “Catholic Inventions” is taken right out of Boettner’s deeply flawed and defamatory book. He plays fast and loose with the facts and dates in his vilifying diatribe against the Church. It’s disturbing that in this day of so much available information, many non‐ Catholic groups still use this bogus list to find fault with the Catholic Church – never investigating the fact that most of its claims are patently false, petty and embarrassingly ignorant. This list or variations of it on can be found on many anti‐Catholic websites and literature. The Anti‐Catholic Bible (cont’d) Boettner wanted to cast a negative light on the disciplines introduced by the Catholic Church and doctrines declared. He wanted to show that they were nothing more than man‐made “inventions” because they were not explicitly taught in the Bible. As you will see, he was dead wrong. The doctrinal and dogmatic decrees made by the Church are Scripturally‐based while other matters of discipline were declared to accommodate the needs of the growing worldwide Church. Aside from Boettner’s attacks being false, it is interesting to note that Protestants have also added some of their own traditions such as altar calls, individual interpretation of Scripture, the withholding of baptism from infants and Sola Scriptura that have no basis in Scripture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin Fathers the 3Nd
    GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH Gaithersburg, Maryland The History of the Early Christian Church Unit Two – The Early Church Fathers “Who Were They?” “Why Do We Remember Them?” The Latin Fathers The 3nd. of Three Sessions in Unit Two The 7th Sunday of Easter - The Sunday after the Ascension – May 14, 2020 (Originally Scheduled / Prepared for the 4th Sunday of Lent, 2020) I. Now Just Where Were We? It has been a long time since we were considering the Church Fathers in Unit 2. This is a “pick up session,” now that we have completed the 14 other sessions of this series on The History of the Early Christian Church. Some may remember that we were giving our attention to the early Church Fathers when the interruption of the Covid19 virus descended upon us, and we found ourselves under stay at home policies. Thanks to our pastor’s leadership ond our well equipped communications equipment and the skill of Pilip Muschke, we were able to be “on line` almost St. Jerome - Translator of Latin Vulgate instanetly. We missed only one session between our live class 4-5th Century and our first on line class. Today, we pick up the session we missed. We had covered two sessions of the three session Unit 2. The first of these sessions was on The Apostolic Fathers. These were those who had either known our Lord or known those who did. Among those would have been the former disciples of Jesus or the early first generation apostles. These were the primary sources to whom the ministry of our Lord was “handed off.” Saint Paul was among them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petrine Ministry at the Time of the First Four Ecumenical Councils
    The Petrine ministry at the time of the first four ecumenical councils: relations between the Bishop of Rome and the Eastern Bishops as revealed in the canons, process, and reception of the councils Author: Pierluigi De Lucia Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1852 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2010 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. BOSTON COLLEGE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AND MINISTRY WESTON JESUIT DEPARTEMENT The Petrine ministry at the Time of the First Four Ecumenical Councils Relations between the Bishop of Rome and the Eastern Bishops as revealed in the canons, process, and reception of the councils A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the S.T.L. Degree Of the School of Theology and Ministry By: Pierluigi De Lucia, S.J. Directed by: Francine Cardman Second Reader: Francis A. Sullivan, S.J. May 2010 © Copyright by Pierluigi DE LUCIA, S.J. 2010 Abstract The Petrine ministry of the bishops of Rome and relations with the eastern bishops at the time of the first four ecumenical councils are the focus of this thesis. It places the Church in the complex historical context marked by the public recognition of Christianity under Constantine (312) and the great novelty of the close interactions of the emperors with the bishops of the major sees in the period, Rome, Alexandria, Antioch and Constantinople. The study examines the structures of the church (local and regional synods and ecumenical councils) and the roles of bishops and emperors in the ecumenical councils of Nicaea (325), Constantinople I (381), Ephesus (431), and Chalcedon (451), including the “robber” council of 449.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas of Doctrinal Differences
    PART 2 AREAS OF DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES In the first part of this volume we have stressed what evangelicals have in common with Roman Catholics. In short, this includes the great fundamentals of the Christian faith, including a belief in the Trinity, the virgin birth, the deity of Christ, the creation and subsequent fall of humanity, Christ’s unique atonement for our sins, the physical resurrection of Christ, the necessity of God’s grace for salvation, the existence of heaven and hell, the second coming of Christ, and the verbal inspiration and infallibility of Scripture. In spite of all these similarities in belief, however, there are some significant differences between Catholics and evangelicals on some important doctrines. Catholics affirm and evangelicals reject the immaculate conception of Mary, her bodily assumption, her role as corredemptrix, the veneration of Mary and other saints, prayers to Mary and the saints, the infallibility of the pope, the existence of purgatory, the inspiration and canonicity of the Apocrypha, the doctrine of transubstantiation, the worship of the transformed Host, the special sacerdotal powers of the Roman Catholic priesthood, and the necessity of works to obtain eternal life. Since all of these have been proclaimed as infallible dogma by the Roman Catholic Church, and since many are contrary to central teachings of evangelicalism, there appears to be no hope of ecumenical or ecclesiastical unity. Here we must recognize our differences and agree to disagree agreeably, knowing that there are many doctrines we hold in common (see Part One) and many things we can do together morally, socially, and educationally (see Part Three).
    [Show full text]
  • St. Ambrose and the Architecture of the Churches of Northern Italy : Ecclesiastical Architecture As a Function of Liturgy
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2008 St. Ambrose and the architecture of the churches of northern Italy : ecclesiastical architecture as a function of liturgy. Sylvia Crenshaw Schneider 1948- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Schneider, Sylvia Crenshaw 1948-, "St. Ambrose and the architecture of the churches of northern Italy : ecclesiastical architecture as a function of liturgy." (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1275. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1275 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ST. AMBROSE AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE CHURCHES OF NORTHERN ITALY: ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE AS A FUNCTION OF LITURGY By Sylvia Crenshaw Schneider B.A., University of Missouri, 1970 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Art History University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2008 Copyright 2008 by Sylvia A. Schneider All rights reserved ST. AMBROSE AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE CHURCHES OF NORTHERN ITALY: ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE AS A FUNCTION OF LITURGY By Sylvia Crenshaw Schneider B. A., University of Missouri, 1970 A Thesis Approved on November 22, 2008 By the following Thesis Committee: ____________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuel Reyes Short History of the Bible † the Bible Is the Collection Of
    Manuel Reyes Yesterday at 1:16am Short History of the Bible † The Bible is the collection of books that the Catholic Church decided could be read at Mass. It is a collection of books written by different authors with different writing styles over thousands of years for different audiences. It is not a manual on how to run a religion or build a church. Those things already existed before the Bible was assembled. The Didache is the earliest manual on how to run a Church. In modern times the Catholic Church is governed by Canon Law and the Catechism which is based on Scripture. At the time of Jesus, the Sadducees, that taught and worshiped at the Temple in Jerusalem, considered only the 5 books of Moses to be the word of God. The Pharisees and Rabbis that taught and worshiped in the Synagogues, considered the 5 books of Moses, the writings of the Prophets, the Psalms, and some of the historical writings as Scripture grouped in sets of 22 or 24 books. Jews living outside of Jerusalem used a Greek Translation of the Old Testament called the Septuagint. This translation has the 46 books of the Catholic Canon of the Old Testament in it, and various others that did not make it into the Catholic Old Testament. The 7 books that are in the Catholic Old Testament but not the Protestant Old Testament are 1st and 2nd Maccabees, Wisdom, Baruch, Sirach, Tobit, and Judith. The Early Christians considered the Greek Septuagint version of the Hebrew writings as Scripture. The New Testament usually quotes from the Greek Septuagint version of the Old Testament.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Indissolubility of Marriage
    THE HISTORY OF THE INDISSOLUBILITY OF MARRIAGE It is the teaching of the Church today that a valid ratified and consummated marriage cannot be dissolved by any human power and that such a marriage is terminated by death alone. This teaching, however, is being more frequently challenged today from within the Church and claims are being made that history provides evidence that the Church can grant divorces for consummated marriages between Christians. This study is an attempt to examine the sources that might help in discussions on the indissolubility of marriage. It does not purport to be an original study nor a completely comprehensive one. Its scope is limited to the first millennium of Christianity, after which time the indissolubility of the marital bond is, for practical purposes, estab- lished in the Church. This history gives particular emphasis to the sources of Western Christianity. I. FATHERS OF THE CHURCH A. Fathers of the West Her mas The earliest text is that of Hermas in the work, The Shepherd. It is usually dated in the period c. 140-150 though some authors assign it to the first century. Hermas was an inhabitant of Rome and his text gives us the teaching of the Roman Church in sub-apostolic times. His work was of such weight that in the early Church it was read in the service of the Church as holy Scripture. Hermas interro- gates the angel of penance what he should do if he learns that his wife is guilty of adultery and receives instructions from the angel: Sir, I said, if anyone has a wife who believes in the Lord, and he detect her in adultery, does the husband sin if he continue to live with her? He said to me: As long as he remains ignor- ant of her sin, he commits no transgression.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen Southeastern University - Lakeland, [email protected]
    Southeastern University FireScholars Classical Conversations Spring 2019 Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen Southeastern University - Lakeland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://firescholars.seu.edu/ccplus Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Andersen, Alex, "Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha" (2019). Classical Conversations. 3. https://firescholars.seu.edu/ccplus/3 This Term Paper is brought to you for free and open access by FireScholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Conversations by an authorized administrator of FireScholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Southeastern University Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen English 1233 Professor Grace Veach April 12, 2019 Andersen 1 Abstract For centuries, Protestants have debated with Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians over the canonicity of the Roman Catholic Apocrypha, a collection of seven books and two additions to books composed from the third century B.C. to the first century A.D. and considered to be canonical by all major non-Protestant Christian denominations. This thesis plunges into this discussion on the Roman Catholic Apocrypha’s canonicity, contending that the Roman Catholic Apocrypha is noncanonical. First, this thesis propounds two broad models for canonicity, the Community Canon Model and the Intrinsic Canon Model, and maintains that the Intrinsic Canon Model is a better model for canonicity than the Community Canon Model. It then explains that many books in the Roman Catholic Apocrypha do not fit the Intrinsic Canon Model’s criteria for canonicity. Next, an argument is made that the Jews had fixed the Hebrew canon during the lifetimes of Jesus and the apostles and that this Hebrew canon excluded the Roman Catholic Apocrypha.
    [Show full text]
  • Note: the Hebrew Scriptures at the Time of Christ Were Combined and Arranged Differently Than Our Old Testament Today
    Understanding Apocrypha, Part 2 [Note: The Hebrew Scriptures at the time of Christ were combined and arranged differently than our Old Testament today. Two common arrangements had either 22 or 24 books. The consensus among scholars is that the 22 or 24 were identical to the 39 in the Protestant Old Testament today.] Common Proposals: 1. The Old Testament canon must not have been clear because Jewish rabbis argued about which books should be included. “The actual discussions of the contents of Scripture in ancient Judaism show no trace of an expanded canon that included the Apocrypha.” (Blomberg, 49) “The only debates reflected among the rabbis in early post-Christian centuries were whether a few of the twenty-two or twenty-four books … merited inclusion, not whether any others deserved to join them.” (Blomberg, 52) 2. Since the library at Qumran (the cave settlement where the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, which was inhabited during the centuries before Christ) contained more than just biblical books, Judaism must have accepted other books. We know little about this unusual Jewish sect that was hiding away at Qumran. If you came to my library in my office you would find many books besides the Bible, but that would not imply anything about my view of the canon. We do know that the residents at Qumran produced commentaries on thirteen biblical books but not on any apocryphal books, and that only three of the books in the Roman Catholic apocrypha were found there. 3. Since the early Greek translations of the Old Testament include some apocryphal books, and since Jesus and the apostles quoted from those Greek translations extensively, they must have approved of those apocryphal books.
    [Show full text]
  • Agnes in Agony: Damasus, Ambrose, Prudentius, and the Construction Of
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2015 Agnes in Agony: Damasus, Ambrose, Prudentius, and the Construction of the Female Martyr Narrative Eric James Poche' Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Poche', Eric James, "Agnes in Agony: Damasus, Ambrose, Prudentius, and the Construction of the Female Martyr Narrative" (2015). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3991. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3991 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. AGNES IN AGONY: DAMASUS, AMBROSE, PRUDENTIUS, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FEMALE MARTYR NARRATIVE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Eric Poché B.A., University of New Orleans, 2007 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2009 August 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Maribel Dietz for her support throughout this entire project. Steven Ross offered his support at several crucial moments and was always willing to lend advice on difficult issues regarding context. Christine Kooi was kind enough to join my committee when she was needed most. Without their help, this Dissertation would not have been possible. I also need to thank my grandmother Jackie Poché, my parents Louis and Mary Poché, and my beautiful wife Lauren Doughty Poché.
    [Show full text]