This is a repository copy of Hierarchy and compromise in English and German municipal development projects. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/110921/ Conference or Workshop Item: Eckersley, Peter Mark orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-8529 (2014) Hierarchy and compromise in English and German municipal development projects. In: UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished) Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing
[email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
[email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Hierarchy and compromise in English and German municipal development projects Abstract This paper draws on over 30 fieldwork interviews to compare the governance of urban development projects in the —twin towns“ of Newcastle (England and Gelsenkirchen (Germany . It finds that Gelsenkirchen has been able to adopt a more hierarchical approach to stipulating the sustainability criteria of new developments, whereas Newcastle has had to work more closely with other partners and seek greater compromises in building design. These different approaches map on to the characteristic —policy styles“ associated with England and Germany (Richardson, 1982 and are shaped by the different institutional contexts within which local government operates in each context (Type II and Type I multi,level governance respectively (-ooghe and .arks, 2003 .