DOCSLIB.ORG

Updated Integrated Tisza River Basin Management Plan Annex 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Updated Integrated Tisza River Basin Management Plan Annex 14 Updated Integrated Tisza River Basin Management Plan Annex 14. Catalogue of groundwater and integration measures evaluation – additional data and information Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ II 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 GWB‛S MEASURES.................................................................................................................................................. 1 INTEGRATION MEASURES .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 TRB MEASURES RELEVANT FOR GWBS .......................................................................................................... 2 GWBS PROGRAMME OF MEASURES BY TRB COUNTRIES ................................................................................................. 3 Ukraine .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Romania ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Slovakia ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Hungary ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 3 TRB INTEGRATION - HORIZONTAL MEASURES REPORTED (BY 2021) ........................................................... 12 Ukraine ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Romania ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Slovakia ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Hungary ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 4 TRB INTEGRATION MEASURES: SOLID PLASTIC WASTE TRB COUNTRIES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ........ 16 Ukraine ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Romania ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Hungary ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................... 19 5 TRB INTEGRATION MEASURES: DRAUGHT AND WATER SCARCITY TRB COUNTRIES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Ukraine ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Romania ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Slovakia ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 Hungary ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 6 TRB INTEGRATION MEASURES: CLIMATE CHANGE ...................................................................................... 24 Ukraine ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Romania ...................................................................................................................................................... 25 Slovakia ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Hungary ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Serbia .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 7 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 29 GWB‛S MEASURES................................................................................................................................................ 29 TRB INTEGRATION MEASURES ................................................................................................................................. 29 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 31 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 31 Updated Integrated Tisza River Basin Management Plan 2019 – Annex 14 i List of Figures Figure II.I: Sectors covered by EU legal instruments that are directly or indirectly relevant to groundwater protection (UWW: urban wastewater – CPD: construction products directive – IPPC: integrated pollution prevention control). This list is not exhaustive, (Source: Groundwater Protection in Europe - The New GW Directive – Consolidating the EU Regulatory Framework .............................. 3 Figure II.2: Number of measures per GBWs quality status assessment changing from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Romania ......................................................................................... 4 Figure II.3 Number of measures per GBWs quantity status assessment changing from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Romania .............................................................................. 4 Figure II.4 Number of measures per GBWs quality status assessment changes from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Slovakia ........................................................................................... 8 Figure II.5 Number of measures per GBWs quantity status assessment changing from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Slovakia ............................................................................... 8 Figure II.6: Number of measures per GBWs quality status assessment changes from the 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Hungary ............................................................................... 9 Figure II.7: Number of measures per GBWs quantity status assessment changes from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Hungary ............................................................................... 9 Figure II.8 Number of measures per GBWs quality status assessment changes from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Serbia ............................................................................................ 11 Figure II.9 Number of measures per GBWs quantity status assessment changes from 1st ITRBMP (2010) to draft updated ITRBMP (2017) in Serbia ............................................................................................ 12 List of Tables Table II.1: TRB Groundwater quality and quantity status assessment/measures in Romania 2010/2017 ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Table II.2: TRB Groundwater quality and quantity status assessment/measures in Slovakia 2010/2017 ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Table II.3: TRB Groundwater quality and quantity status assessment/measures in Hungary 2010/2017 ...............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 21St Danube-Kris-Mures-Tisza (DKMT) Euroregional Conference on Environment and Health
    21st Danube-Kris-Mures-Tisza (DKMT) Euroregional Conference on Environment and Health University of Novi Sad Faculty of Technology Novi Sad NOVI SAD 6‐8 June 2019 PROCEEDINGS 21st Danube-Kris-Mures-Tisza (DKMT) Euroregional Conference on Environment and Health University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology, Novi Sad, Serbia 06-08 June 2019 Title: Proceedings. 21st Danube-Kris-Mures-Tisza (DKMT) Euroregional Conference on Environment and Health Published by: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara 1, Novi Sad, Serbia For publisher: Prof. Dr. Biljana Pajin, Dean, Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia Editor: Prof. Dr. Biljana Škrbić No. of copies – 75 This publication is financially supported by: Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia and Provintial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији Библиотеке Матице српске, Нови Сад 502:613(082) DANUBE-Kris-Mures-Tisa Euroregional Conference on Environment and Health (21 ; 2019 ; Novi Sad) Proceedings [Elektronski izvor] / 21st Danube-Kris-Mures-Tisa (DKMT) Euroregional Conference on Environment and Health, Novi Sad, 6-8 June 2019 ; [editor Biljana Škrbić]. - Novi Sad : Faculty of Technology, 2019. - 1 elektronski optički disk (CD-ROM) : tekst, slika ; 12 cm Tiraž 75. - Bibliografija uz svaki rad. - Registar. ISBN 978-86-6253-107-0 а) Животна средина -- Здравље -- Зборници COBISS.SR-ID 329583623 21st
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Title of My Paper
    JOURNAL OF LINGUISTIC STUDIES 105 106 2010 VOLUME 3 (1) ISSN 2065 – 2429 JOURNAL OF LINGUISTIC STUDIES Editorial office: 300645 TIMIŞOARA Calea Aradului nr. 119, Phone 0256/494023/7287 107 EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR Assist. Professor Georgeta RAŢĂ – BUASVM, Timişoara, Romania EDITORIAL BOARD Professor Snežana GUDURIŠ – University of Novi Sad, Serbia Professor Rodica NAGY – Ştefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania Professor Natalia PUSHINA – Udmurt State University, Izhevsk, Udmurtia, Russia Assist. Professor Reghina DASCĂL – West University of Timişoara, Romania Assist. Professor Simona MANOLACHE – Ştefan cel Mare University, Suceava, Romania Assist. Professor Roumyana PETROVA – University of Rousse, Bulgaria SECRETARY Diana-Andreea BOC-SÎNMĂRGHIŢAN, PhD – BUASVM, Timişoara, Romania 108 CONTENTS Foreword 7 Etymological Issues 9 Davide ASTORI T RUMANIAN TABǍRǍ AND „AEGEAN-(PRE)PHILISTINE‟ * /D(A)BR 9 Languages in Contact 15 Sandra STEFANOVIŠ & Alina-Andreea DRAGOESCU ANGLICISMS IN THE SERBIAN AND ROMANIAN LANGUAGE OF ADVERTISING 15 Mariya TSIPLE & Virginia OPRIŞA THE HUNGARIAN INFLUENCE ON THE ROMANIAN VOCABULARY OF MARAMUREŞ AND BANAT (ROMANIA) 21 Morphology 33 Milica MILOJEVIŠ ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUFFIX -IZACIJA (-IZATION) IN PUBLICISTIC STYLE 33 Applied Linguistics 37 Mohd Sallehhudin Abd AZIZ THE MALAYSIAN RECEP* EXPERIMENT: THE USE OF RESIDENTIAL COLLEGES AS EXPERIMENTATION BED 37 Diana-Andreea BOC-SINMARGHITAN & Ioana BANADUC L‟EMPLOI DE LA TOPONYMIE DANS L`ENSEIGNEMENT DU FLE 45 Jelena DANILOVIŠ & Sandra STEFANOVIŠ MORPHOLOGICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Redescription of Eudontomyzon Stankokaramani (Petromyzontes, Petromyzontidae) – a Little Known Lamprey from the Drin River Drainage, Adriatic Sea Basin
    Folia Zool. – 53(4): 399–410 (2004) Redescription of Eudontomyzon stankokaramani (Petromyzontes, Petromyzontidae) – a little known lamprey from the Drin River drainage, Adriatic Sea basin Juraj HOLČÍK1 and Vitko ŠORIĆ2 1 Department of Ecosozology, Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, R.Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia and Montenegro; e-mail: [email protected] Received 28 May 2004; Accepted 24 November 2004 A b s t r a c t . Nonparasitic lamprey found in the Beli Drim River basin (Drin River drainage, Adriatic Sea watershed) represents a valid species Eudontomyzon stankokaramani Karaman, 1974. From other species of the genus Eudontomyzon it differs in its dentition, and the number and form of velar tentacles. This is the first Eudontomyzon species found in the Adriatic Sea watershed. Key words: Eudontomyzon stankokaramani, Beli Drim River basin, Drin River drainage, Adriatic Sea watershed, West Balkan, Serbia Introduction Eudontomyzon is one of five genera that belong to the family Petromyzontidae occurring in the Palaearctic faunal region. Within this region the genus is composed of one parasitic and two non-parasitic species. According to recent knowledge, Europe is inhabited by E. danfordi Regan, 1911, E. mariae (Berg, 1931), E. hellenicus Vladykov, Renaud, Kott et Economidis, 1982, and also by a still unnamed but now probably extinct species of anadromous parasitic lamprey related to E. mariae known from the Prut, Dnieper and Dniester Rivers (H o l č í k & R e n a u d 1986, R e n a u d 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Orientativa Proiecte PDR 2014-2020
    LISTA ORIENTATIVA A PROIECTELOR AFLATE IN PORTOFOLIU IN REGIUNEA SUD-VEST OLTENIA (EXEMPLE DE PROIECTE PRIORITARE) DOMENIU LOCALIZARE BENEFICIAR TITLU Reabilitare DJ 552 Craiova -Mofleni-Bucovăţ-Italieni- Terpeziţa- Sălcuţa-Plopşor-Vârtop-Caraula-Cetate Dolj CJ Dolj (DN56A) INFRASTRUCTURA DE Modernizare DJ 606 A Breasta (DJ 606) – Obedin – TRANSPORT Mihăiţa – Potmelţu – Coţofenii din Dos – Scaeşti – Dolj CJ Dolj ValealuiPătru – Salcia – Argetoaia – Iordăcheşti – Piria – Lim. Jud. Mehedinti Reabilitarea sistem rutier pe DJ 671B, km 4+500 – 41+000, lim. Jud. Mehedinți-Văgiulești-Samarinești- Gorj CJ Gorj Motru-Lupoaia-Cătunele-Glogova-Cămuiești, jud. Gorj INFRASTRUCTURA DE TRANSPORT Reabilitare DJ 674, Vlăduleni – Urdari – Turceni – Ionești – limitajud. Mehedinți – 44,146 km ( km 0+000 Gorj CJ Gorj – 44+146) Nr. Km DJ reabilitat/modernizat : 44,146km Reabilitare si modernizareDJ 562AGruia(intersectia cu DN56C)-Pătulele-Cioroboreni-Vînjuleţ-Rogova INFRASTRUCTURA DE (intersectia cu DN 56 A)-Livezile (intersectia cu DJ Mehedinti CJ Mehedinti TRANSPORT 606B),Livezile-Petris, Izvoru, Anestilor,Valea Izvorului, Bistrita ,,Reabilitarea si modernizarea CULOARULUI RUTIER JUDETEAN SUD-EST intre DN6-DN 56A, pe traseul Mehedinti CJ Mehedinti DN6-DJ 606D--tronson din DJ 606A-tronson din DJ561A-DJ563-DN 56A in judetulMehedinti Reabilitare si modernizare drum judetean DJ 546, km 40+000-127+200, limitajudetTeleorman (Sprancenata) Olt CJ Olt Verguleasa (DN67B) INFRASTRUCTURA DE TRANSPORT Reabilitare si modernizare drum judetean DJ 642, km Olt CJ Olt 0+000-60+000,Dobrosloveni-Giuvarasti-
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphologic Effects of Human Impact Across the Svydovets Massif in the Eastern Carpathians in Ukraine
    PL ISSN 0081-6434 studia geomorphologica carpatho-balcanica vol. liii – liV, 2019 – 2020 : 85 – 111 1 1 1 3 PIOTR KŁapYTA , KaZimier2 Z KrZemieŃ , elŻBIETA GORCZYca , PAWeŁ KrĄŻ , lidia dubis (KraKÓW, lViV) GEOMORPHOLOGIC EFFECTS OF HUMAN IMPACT ACROSS THE SVYDOVETS MASSIF IN THE EASTERN CARPATHIANS IN UKRAINE Abstract - : contemporary changes in the natural environment in many mountain areas, espe cially those occurring above the upper tree line, are related to tourism. the svydovets massif,- located in the eastern carpathians in ukraine, is a good example of an area that is currently experiencing intense degradation. the highest, ne part of this area is crisscrossed with nu merous paths, tourist routes, and ski trails. the strong human impact the area experiences is occurring simultaneously with the activity of natural geomorphologic processes. the processes occur with the greatest intensity above the upper tree line.th the development of the discussed- area has been occurring gradually since the early 20 century. it started when the region belonged to austria-hungary, then czechoslovakia, and subsequently the ussr. now that it be longs to independent ukraine the level of tourism-related development has sharply increased. comparing it to other mountain areas, such as the tatras, the alps, or the monts dore massif in France, the svydovets massif is being reshaped much more rapidly due to the damage caused byKeywords human impact. : human impact, tourism-related deterioration of mountains, high mountains, svydovets, eastern carpathians, ukraine INTRODUCTION - man plays a huge role in the reshaping of the geographic environment and hu man activity is especially noticeable in the mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Alien Macroinvertebrate Species in Serbian Waters
    water Article Diversity of Alien Macroinvertebrate Species in Serbian Waters Katarina Zori´c* , Ana Atanackovi´c,Jelena Tomovi´c,Božica Vasiljevi´c,Bojana Tubi´c and Momir Paunovi´c Department for Hydroecology and Water Protection, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stankovi´c”—NationalInstitute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (J.T.); [email protected] (B.V.); [email protected] (B.T.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 7 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: This article provides the first comprehensive list of alien macroinvertebrate species registered and/or established in aquatic ecosystems in Serbia as a potential threat to native biodiversity. The list comprised field investigations, articles, grey literature, and unpublished data. Twenty-nine species of macroinvertebrates have been recorded since 1942, with a domination of the Ponto-Caspian faunistic elements. The majority of recorded species have broad distribution and are naturalized in the waters of Serbia, while occasional or single findings of seven taxa indicate that these species have failed to form populations. Presented results clearly show that the Danube is the main corridor for the introduction and spread of non-native species into Serbia. Keywords: Serbia; inland waters; allochthonous species; introduction 1. Introduction The Water Framework Directive (WFD) [1] represents key regulation and one of the most important documents in the European Union water legislation since it was adopted in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • “Romanian Waters”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania
    NATIONAL ADMNISTRATION “ROMANIAN WATERS” Romania key input to the Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters under the UNECE Water Convention Prut River Basin CORINA COSMINA BOSCORNEA, PhD National Administration “Romanian Waters ”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania Ukraine - Kiev, 28 th April 2010 Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Romanian transboundary river basins Information about transboundary river basins: •Somes/Szamos, •Mures/Maros, •Crisuri, Tisza River •Banat, basin •Siret, •Prut, •Dobrogea-Litoral , •Arges-Vedea Danube •Banat River Basin •Buzau-Ialomita District •Jiu Romanian river basins Prut river basins in the Danube river basin district Prut river basin 1. General description of the Prut river basin The total Population Area in area of the Major density in the Shared the Character with an river basin transbound area in the countries country in average elevation in the ary river country km² (%) country (persons/km 2) upland character Romania, (Ukrainian 10,990 Ukraine and 27820 Prut Carpathians) and 55 (39.5%) Moldova lowland (lower reaches) • The Prut river basin is shared by Ukraine, Romania and Moldova Its source is in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Later, the Prut forms the border between Romania and Moldova. • The rivers Lapatnic, Drageste and Racovet are transboundary tributaries in the Prut sub-basin; they cross the Ukrainian- Moldavian border. • The Prut River’s major national tributaries are the rivers Cheremosh and Derelui, (Ukraine), Baseu, Jijia,
    [Show full text]
  • Navigation on the Danube (Allied Powers: Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Navigation on the Danube (Allied Powers: Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria 2 August 1921 VOLUME I pp. 97-212 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 IV. CESSION OF VESSELS AND TUGS FOR NAVIGATION ON THE DANUBE *. PARTIES : Allied Powers (Czechoslovakia, Greece, Rumania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria. COMPROMIS : Treaty of Versailles, Article 339 2 ; Article 300 of Treaty of St. Germain 3 ; Article 284 of Treaty of Trianon and Article 228 of Treaty of Neuilly-sur- Seine. ARBITRATOR : Walker D. Hines (U.S.A.). DECISION : Paris, August 2, 1921. Confiscation of private property in warfare.—Allocation and condition of vessels of disputed ownership and nationality.—Question of jurisdiction. —Fourth Hague Convention of 1907 (Articles 46 and 53 of its annexed Regulations).—Legal character of private property hired by belligerent State for military purposes.—Effect of military acts after armistice between some but not all of the belligerents. General conditions for effectual ion of permanent allocation.—Delivery of vessels.—Claim for excess fittings and gear.—Vessels whose nationality is affected by change of nationality of owners.—Claims to allocation asserted by Czechoslovakia as a succession State. Cession by Germany, Austria ,md Hungary to meet legitimate needs of Allied and Associated Powers concerned.—Legitimate needs of States for freight traffic.—International character of the River Save,—Basic freight traffic on the Danube in 1911 to be considered in estimating legitimate needs of parties concerned.—Modification of such basis on account of subsequent developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary River Basin Management of the Körös/Crisuri
    Romania The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Develoment Danub e / Tisa za Tis Körös / Crisuri Basin Transboundary River Basin Management of the Körös/Crisuri River Project, Hungary - Romania Pilot project supporting the strategy of the Danubian countries for integrated water management PROJECT BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE :Transboundary River Basin Management of the Körös/Crisuri River, Assistance with tools set-up for the control and management of the Körös/Crisuri Basin PARTNER : Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable spatial planning / INSTITUTION FRANCE Ministry of Environment and Water / HUNGARY Ministry of Environment and Water Management / ROMANIA PROJECT AMOUNT : 1,024,000 Euro BENEFICIARY :International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River PRIME CONTRACTOR : International Office for Water PROJECT STARTING : June 2005 DATE IMPLEMENTATION : 2 years DURATION Project context y International management Basin coordination ICPDR Danube coordination Tisza Hungary Romania 2 National WFD implementation strategy 8 Project objectives Strengthen the cooperation between Hungarian and Romanian organisations responsible for environment and water management, including public participation for the development of: • River Basin Management Plan (RBMP) in line with WFD requirements • Watershed Contingency Plan (WCP) to improve response to future accidental water pollution. Other important results: • team work between the practitioners working on water issues in the two countries • transfer of new methodologies and practices
    [Show full text]
  • Human Potential of the Western Ukrainian Borderland
    Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 2017, 7(2), 17–23 DOI 10.4467/24512249JG.17.011.6627 HUMAN POTENTIAL OF THE WESTERN UKRAINIAN BORDERLAND Iryna Hudzelyak (1), Iryna Vanda (2) (1) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) (2) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] Citation Hudzelyak I., Vanda I., 2017, Human potential of the Western Ukrainian borderland, Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 7(2), 17–23. Abstract This article contains the analysis made with the help of generalized quantative parameters, which shows the tendencies of hu- man potential formation of the Western Ukrainian borderland during 2001–2016. The changes of number of urban and rural population in eighteen borderland rayons in Volyn, Lviv and Zakarpattia oblasts are evaluated. The tendencies of urbanization processes and resettlement of rural population are described. Spatial differences of age structure of urban and rural population are characterized. Key words Western Ukrainian borderland, human potential, population, depopulation, aging of population. 1. Introduction during the period of closed border had more so- cial influence from the West, which formed specific Ukraine has been going through the process of model of demographic behavior and reflected in dif- depopulation for some time; it was caused with ferent features of the human potential. significant reduction in fertility and essential mi- The category of human potential was developed gration losses of reproductive cohorts that lasted in economic science and conceptually was related almost a century.
    [Show full text]
  • 03.04.2021, Ora 08.00
    RAPORT PRIVIND SITUAŢIA HIDROMETEOROLOGICĂ ŞI A CALITĂŢII MEDIULUI în intervalul 02.04.2021, ora 08.00 – 03.04.2021, ora 08.00 I. SITUAŢIA HIDROMETEOROLOGICĂ 1. Situația și prognoza hidro pe râurile interioare şi Dunăre din 03.04.2021, ora 07.00 RÂURI Debitele au fost, în general, în creștere, ca urmare a precipitațiilor prognozate, cedării apei din stratul de zăpadă și propagării, cu excepția râurilor din bazinele: Bârzava, Moravița, Caraș, Nera, Cerna, Vedea, Jijia, Bârlad, bazinele mijlocii și inferioare ale râurilor Jiu, Olt, Argeș, Ialomița și Prut și pe râurile din Dobrogea, unde debitele au fost relativ staționare. Debitele se situează la valori sub mediile multianuale lunare, cu coeficienți moduli cuprinși între 30-90%, mai mari (în jurul și peste normalele lunare) pe râurile din bazinele hidrografice: Vișeu, Iza, Tur, Crasna, Barcău, Bega, Bârzava, Caraș, Prahova, Suceava, Moldova, Trotuș, bazinul superior al Jiului, bazinul superior și mijlociu al Oltului, cursurile superioare ale Siretului, Putnei, Buzăului și Prutului și pe râurile din Dobrogea şi mai mici (sub 30%) pe râurile din bazinele hidrografice: Bega Veche, Cerna, Bârlad, Jijia şi pe unii afluenți din bazinul mijlociu al Oltului. Este în vigoare ATENȚIONAREA HIDROLOGICĂ nr. 31 din 02.04.2021. În interval a fost emisă o ATENȚIONARE HIDROLOGICĂ pentru fenomene imediate. Nivelurile pe râuri la stațiile hidrometrice se situează în general sub COTELE DE ATENȚIE, exceptând râul Crasna la stația Domănești – jud SM (400+27). Debitele vor fi în creștere, ca urmare a precipitațiilor în curs, a celor prognozate, a cedării apei din stratul de zăpadă și propagării pe râurile din centrul, estul și sudul țării și relativ staționare în rest.
    [Show full text]