DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright by Lydia Nicole Bierer 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Copyright By Lydia Nicole Bierer 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Lydia N. Bierer certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Online Community Building by Autistic Adults Committee: ____________________________________ Diane L. Schallert, Supervisor ____________________________________ Marilla D. Svinicki, ____________________________________ Claire Ellen Weinstein ____________________________________ Edmund T. Emmer ____________________________________ Mary Jo Worthy Online Community Building by Autistic Adults by Lydia Nicole Bierer, B.A; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2013 Dedication I dedicate this in loving memory of my mom Leila Bierer who left us much too soon last Spring (2012). My mom was my first teacher both in ABA therapy and in life. Many of the things that she told me as I was growing up I didn’t always believe, but now that I have the benefit of time, I can see that she was right all along. It is true that through faith, perseverance and a little bit of luck, anything is possible, even a dissertation. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge my committee for all of their tireless work in helping me make this document as good as it could be without driving us all crazy. I would also like to acknowledge my classmates who helped me through the tough times, particularly with all of those weekend and after hours study sessions for statistics classes. I’ll never forget you. Finally, I would like to acknowledge all of the researchers before me and who will come after me. v Online Community Building by Autistic Adults Lydia Nicole Bierer, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: Diane L. Schallert One diagnostic criterion to identify individuals as having an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is that their communication patterns, social reciprocity, and interactional competence show qualitative impairment (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). And yet, my experience as an individual who was once diagnosed as ASD and my investigations of Internet websites run by and for autistic individuals led me to see that individuals who identify as ASD are not only interested in communicating with others but highly articulate in self-advocating through the affordances of online communication. My research was focused on exploring the communicative experiences of individuals who participated in two websites designed by and for autistic individuals as a means of self-advocacy, WrongPlanet and AspiesforFreedom. The method used to study the two websites was that of participant-observer. Having joined the online groups by introducing myself, I was able to peruse archived postings and current threads available on the websites. I analyzed threads of postings for themes being discussed and for features showing evidence of what Herring (2004) described as online community. Some of the postings were triangulated by interviewing participants. These interviews revealed more personal information about how one vi chooses to self-advocate and create community online. Results indicated that the forum posts of these two autistic-run websites demonstrated evidence of shared community and self-advocacy through the topics discussed. The autistic individuals I studied seemed to want to be seen as having a difference not a deficit. They acknowledged their struggles, but posited that individuals with ASD have strengths that are uncommon and are currently being under-utilized by society. Their use of the Internet demonstrates how autistic individuals are capable of communicating about a wide variety of topics, and are capable of contributing to the conversation about what makes them similar and different from those whom they call Neurotypical . The significance of this study is that insights I present have a different validity than other studies of autistic individuals conducted by non-autistic researchers. Also, by challenging stereotypes of the capabilities of autistic individuals, a path is created whereby all may benefit from the strengths, talents, and insights they are able to provide. vii Table Of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Prevalence of Autism...........................................................................................2 The Construct of Neurodiversity........................................................................ 5 Autism and The Internet.....................................................................................7 Researcher Disclosure.......................................................................................10 Rationale and Research Questions....................................................................12 Chapter 2: Literature Review.......................................................................................15 Autism...............................................................................................................16 Political Activism Associated with Autism......................................................28 Computer-Mediated Communication................................................................41 Ethical and Philosophical Issues Related to Research with Special Populations and CMC.......................................................................................52 Chapter 3: Method.......................................................................................................59 Pilot Study.........................................................................................................60 Main Study........................................................................................................65 Data Analysis....................................................................................................71 Data Trustworthiness........................................................................................75 Descriptive Statistics.........................................................................................76 Timeline.............................................................................................................86 viii Chapter 4: Results........................................................................................................87 Research Question 1.........................................................................................87 Research Question 2.........................................................................................96 Research Question 3.......................................................................................109 Chapter 5: Discussion................................................................................................119 Findings Connected to the Existing Literature...............................................119 Limitations of the Study.................................................................................127 Implications for Practitioners.........................................................................128 Further Research.............................................................................................131 Conclusion......................................................................................................132 References..................................................................................................................133 ix List of Tables Table 2.1....The DSM criteria for a diagnosis of Autistic Disorder..........................17 Table 2.2....The DSM criteria for a diagnosis of Asperger’s Disorder.....................18 Table 2.3....Behavioral Differences of Autistic and Normal Infants........................20 Table 3.1....Example of Coding table ......................................................................72 Table 3.2....Descriptive statistics of posters for both websites.................................76 Table 3.3....Posters' ASD identification...................................................................77 Table 3.4....Number of Postings and Posters for Threads For Wrongplanet............80 Table 3.5....Number of Postings and Posters for Threads For Aspiesforfreedom....80 Table 4.1....Wrongplanet forum topics.....................................................................87 Table 4.2....Aspiesforfreedom forum topics.............................................................89 Table 4.3....ASD related thread titles grouped into categories.................................91 Table 4.4....General topic thread titles grouped into categories...............................95 Table 4.5....Discourse practice used by posters for thread about lack of encouragement for graduate studies.............................................................99 Table 4.6....Discourse practice used by posters for the thread "why do you have meltdowns?"...............................................................................................100 Table 4.7....Discourse practices used by posters for the thread about getting a diagnosis......................................................................................101 Table 4.8....Discourse practices used by posters for the thread about being rejected for a job.........................................................................................101 x Table 4.9....Discourse
Recommended publications
  • The Life and Times Of'asperger's Syndrome': a Bakhtinian Analysis Of

    The Life and Times Of'asperger's Syndrome': a Bakhtinian Analysis Of

    The life and times of ‘Asperger’s Syndrome’: A Bakhtinian analysis of discourses and identities in sociocultural context Kim Davies Bachelor of Education (Honours 1st Class) (UQ) Graduate Diploma of Teaching (Primary) (QUT) Bachelor of Social Work (UQ) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 The School of Education 1 Abstract This thesis is an examination of the sociocultural history of ‘Asperger’s Syndrome’ in a Global North context. I use Bakhtin’s theories (1919-21; 1922-24/1977-78; 1929a; 1929b; 1935; 1936-38; 1961; 1968; 1970; 1973), specifically of language and subjectivity, to analyse several different but interconnected cultural artefacts that relate to ‘Asperger’s Syndrome’ and exemplify its discursive construction at significant points in its history, dealt with chronologically. These sociocultural artefacts are various but include the transcript of a diagnostic interview which resulted in the diagnosis of a young boy with ‘Asperger’s Syndrome’; discussion board posts to an Asperger’s Syndrome community website; the carnivalistic treatment of ‘neurotypicality’ at the parodic website The Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical as well as media statements from the American Psychiatric Association in 2013 announcing the removal of Asperger’s Syndrome from the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-5 (APA, 2013). One advantage of a Bakhtinian framework is that it ties the personal and the sociocultural together, as inextricable and necessarily co-constitutive. In this way, the various cultural artefacts are examined to shed light on ‘Asperger’s Syndrome’ at both personal and sociocultural levels, simultaneously.
  • Gesnerus 2020-2.Indb

    Gesnerus 2020-2.Indb

    Gesnerus 77/2 (2020) 279–311, DOI: 10.24894/Gesn-de.2020.77012 Vom «autistischen Psychopathen» zum Autismusspektrum. Verhaltensdiagnostik und Persönlichkeitsbehauptung in der Geschichte des Autismus Rüdiger Graf Abstract Der Aufsatz untersucht das Verhältnis von Persönlichkeit und Verhalten in der Defi nition und Diagnostik des Autismus von Kanner und Asperger in den 1940er Jahren bis in die neueren Ausgaben des DSM und ICD. Dazu unter- scheidet er drei verschiedene epistemische Zugänge zum Autismus: ein exter- nes Wissen der dritten Person, das über Verhaltensbeobachtungen, Testver- fahren und Elterninterviews gewonnen wird; ein stärker praktisches Wissen der zweiten Person, das in der andauernden, alltäglichen Interaktion bei El- tern und Betreuer*innen entsteht, und schließlich das introspektive Wissen der ersten Person, d.h. der Autist*innen selbst. Dabei resultiert die Kerndif- ferenz in der Behandlung des Autismus daraus, ob man meint, die Persönlich- keit eines Menschen allein über die Beobachtung von Verhaltensweisen er- schließen zu können oder ob es sich um eine vorgängige Struktur handelt, die introspektiv zugänglich ist, Verhalten prägt und ihm Sinn verleihen kann. Die Entscheidung hierüber führt zu grundlegend anderen Positionierungen zu verhaltenstherapeutischen Ansätzen, wie insbesondere zu Ole Ivar Lovaas’ Applied Behavior Analysis. Autismus; Psychiatriegeschichte; Wissensgeschichte; Verhaltenstherapie; Neurodiversität PD Dr. Rüdiger Graf, Leibniz-Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam, Am Neuen Markt 1, 14467 Potsdam, [email protected]. Gesnerus 77 (2020) 279 Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 01:45:02AM via free access «Autistic Psychopaths» and the Autism Spectrum. Diagnosing Behavior and Claiming Personhood in the History of Autism The article examines how understandings of personality and behavior have interacted in the defi nition and diagnostics of autism from Kanner and As- perger in the 1940s to the latest editions of DSM and ICD.
  • Becoming Autistic: How Do Late Diagnosed Autistic People

    Becoming Autistic: How Do Late Diagnosed Autistic People

    Becoming Autistic: How do Late Diagnosed Autistic People Assigned Female at Birth Understand, Discuss and Create their Gender Identity through the Discourses of Autism? Emily Violet Maddox Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Sociology and Social Policy September 2019 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................................................. 8 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.3 OUTLINE OF CHAPTERS ....................................................................................................................................
  • Neurodiversity: Accepting Autistic Difference

    Neurodiversity: Accepting Autistic Difference

    Accepted version. Published in Learning Disability Practice, May 2013 | Volume 16 | Number 4, p. 32-37. Neurodiversity: accepting autistic difference Thomas Owren1 and Trude Stenhammer2 Abstract ‘Insider’ descriptions of living with autism in a world where most people are not autistic may at the same time inform and challenge a professional approach to what can be termed as ‘autistic behaviour’. This article draws on the perspectives of the ‘neurodiversity’ movement, people who themselves have diagnoses on the autistic spectrum but reject that autism is a disorder, choosing instead to fight for their right to be autistic. The authors include a case study to explore how such descriptions and perspectives can be applied to services supporting an autistic service user. They conclude that, regardless of whether autism is seen as a difference or a disorder, care staff providing services to autistic service users may need to examine their assumptions carefully if they are to avoid discriminatory practices. Introduction Autism, including Asperger syndrome, is generally perceived as a disorder. But over the past two decades, helped by the emergence of the internet (Sinclair 2010), autistic self-advocates have been cultivating the idea of autism as a neurological difference. Referring to this movement called the ‘autism rights’ or ‘neurodiversity’ movement, French researcher Brigitte Chamak writes: ‘If the disability movement is considered as the latest generation of social movements, the action of autistic persons can be viewed as the latest generation of the disability movements’ (Chamak 2008). British autism researcher Simon Baron-Cohen (2012) also commented in a recent talk that looking at the neurobiology of autism there is not much evidence for dysfunction, but a lot of evidence that people on the autistic spectrum are simply different.
  • The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity

    The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity

    BioSocieties (2009), 4, 425–445 ª London School of Economics and Political Science doi:10.1017/S1745855209990287 The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity Francisco Ortega Institute for Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Saˇ o Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The neurodiversity movement has so far been dominated by autistic people who believe their condition is not a disease to be treated and, if possible, cured, but rather a human specificity (like sex or race) that must be equally respected. Autistic self-advocates largely oppose groups of parents of autistic children and professionals searching for a cure for autism. This article discusses the posi- tions of the pro-cure and anti-cure groups. It also addresses the emergence of autistic cultures and various issues concerning autistic identities. It shows how identity issues are frequently linked to a ‘neurological self-awareness’ and a rejection of psychological interpretations. It argues that the preference for cerebral explanations cannot be reduced to an aversion to psychoanalysis or psychological culture. Instead, such preference must be understood within the context of the dif- fusion of neuroscientific claims beyond the laboratory and their penetration in different domains of life in contemporary biomedicalized societies. Within this framework, neuroscientific theories, prac- tices, technologies and therapies are influencing the ways we think about ourselves and relate to others, favoring forms of neurological or cerebral subjectivation. The article shows how neuroscien- tific claims are taken up in the formation of identities, as well as social and community networks.
  • The Joy of Autism: Part 2

    The Joy of Autism: Part 2

    However, even autistic individuals who are profoundly disabled eventually gain the ability to communicate effectively, and to learn, and to reason about their behaviour and about effective ways to exercise control over their environment, their unique individual aspects of autism that go beyond the physiology of autism and the source of the profound intrinsic disabilities will come to light. These aspects of autism involve how they think, how they feel, how they express their sensory preferences and aesthetic sensibilities, and how they experience the world around them. Those aspects of individuality must be accorded the same degree of respect and the same validity of meaning as they would be in a non autistic individual rather than be written off, as they all too often are, as the meaningless products of a monolithically bad affliction." Based on these extremes -- the disabling factors and atypical individuality, Phil says, they are more so disabling because society devalues the atypical aspects and fails to accommodate the disabling ones. That my friends, is what we are working towards -- a place where the group we seek to "help," we listen to. We do not get offended when we are corrected by the group. We are the parents. We have a duty to listen because one day, our children may be the same people correcting others tomorrow. In closing, about assumptions, I post the article written by Ann MacDonald a few days ago in the Seattle Post Intelligencer: By ANNE MCDONALD GUEST COLUMNIST Three years ago, a 6-year-old Seattle girl called Ashley, who had severe disabilities, was, at her parents' request, given a medical treatment called "growth attenuation" to prevent her growing.
  • Overcoming the Odds: Disability Studies,Fat Studies, and Rhetorics

    Overcoming the Odds: Disability Studies,Fat Studies, and Rhetorics

    © 2014, Laura Thacker. Overcoming the Odds: Disability Studies, Fat Studies, and Rhetorics of Bodily Control Laura Thacker, Kansas State University s the field of disability studies expands, a question that is cropping Aup in theoretical discussions more and more often is whether or not Fatness falls into the category of disability. Theorist April Herndon gives a compelling argument for the inclusion of Fat within disability studies, making an especially interesting connection between the idea of “elective disability” in the Deaf community (associated with a refusal to undergo procedures for cochlear implants or similar surgeries) and the idea that Fat people actively “choose” to be Fat by foregoing medical treatment. Herndon states, “[B]oth Fat and Deaf people are often considered morally blameworthy when they choose not to adopt recommended treatment. Similarly, both fatness and deafness are routinely recognized as medical conditions but seldom as the counter-hegemonic identities of Fat and Deaf, especially within the contexts of law and medicine” (128). The connection Herndon is making is that, rather than recognizing Fat and Deaf as identities that 81 Reflections | Volume 14.1, Fall 2014 many people embrace, both are seen as defects that could and should be fixed. Thus, Herndon is making a clear connection between Fat studies and disability studies—that of medicalization, perceived choice, and normalization. Feminist theory also actively discusses issues of normalizing bodies. While many theorists make the connection between feminism and disability studies, Rosemarie Garland-Thomson was one of the first to do so in her article “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” However, although Garland-Thomson makes a very clear argument for how feminist theory can help transform the ways we look at embodiments of disability, she never explicitly mentions how considering Fat embodiments might add to this discussion.
  • 1 with Permission to Put It Online Till It Goes Onto

    1 with Permission to Put It Online Till It Goes Onto

    1 With permission to put it online till it goes onto their webpage Preprint: To appear online (in different formatting of the table) in Disability Studies Quarterly, January 2014 Vol 34(1) Analyzing the discourse surrounding Autism in the New York Times using an ableism lens Alshaba Billawala Bachelor and Gregor Wolbring2* 1 BHSc student, University of Calgary; E-Mail: [email protected] 2Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Community Health Sciences, stream of Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; [email protected]; Abstract: The topic of Autism is highly visible within academic literature (over 20000 articles in the database PubMed of US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health and the public domain (79 Million hits in Google). Newspapers also show a great interest in autism. However despite the prevalence of autism coverage very little media analysis has been performed. We present here an analysis of the coverage of autism in the New York Times from the time the term autism first appeared (1973) to 2012. Ability expectations 2 and preferences are one dynamic through which members of a group judge others, themselves and their lives. Ability preferences and judgments are at the root of many rules of behaviours and customs. Ableism was one lens through which we analyzed the discourse surrounding autism in the NYT. We found that readers that rely on the NYT as a primary source of information get very limited information about what autism is and what factors are associated with autism and they are heavily exposed to a medical narrative.
  • From the Invisible Hand to Joined Hands

    From the Invisible Hand to Joined Hands

    1 From the Invisible Hand to Joined Hands But for the personal computing movement, there would be no Apple. Nearly all of the technical aspects associated with personal computing—small computers, microproces- sors, keyboard-based interfaces, individual usability—were available in 1972. As early as 1969, Honeywell had released the H316 “Kitchen Computer” priced at $10,600 in the Neiman Marcus catalog, and in 1971 John Blankenbaker had intro- duced the Kenbak-1 priced at $750 and Steve Wozniak and Bill Fernandez had built their Cream Soda Computer—so named because they drank Cragmont cream soda as they built the computer with chips discarded by local semicon- ductor companies. But the idea of using computers as personalized tools that augmented the autonomy of individuals only took root because of the efforts of hobbyists and engineers.1 According to some, the first shot of the personal computing movement was in 1966 when Steven Gray founded the Amateur Com- puting Society and published a newsletter for hobbyists, which became a model for hobbyist clubs around the coun- try. At that time, large firms such as IBM or DEC were dedi- cated to a centralized conception of computing in which the mainframe was tended by a priesthood of managers, engi- neers, and operators who prevented users from touching and working with the computer. Their focus effectively blinkered them to the other possibilities—that fans and tinkerers 1 Chapter 1 should have access and that they could in fact make a bundle by serving that market. As one historian of computing noted, “The most rigid rule was that no one should be able to touch or tamper with the machine itself.
  • The Deaf Do Not Beg: Making the Case for Citizenship, 1880-1956

    The Deaf Do Not Beg: Making the Case for Citizenship, 1880-1956

    The Deaf Do Not Beg: Making the Case for Citizenship, 1880-1956 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Octavian Elijah Robinson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Susan Hartmann, Advisor Paula Baker Susan Burch Judy Tzu-Chun Wu Copyright by Octavian Elijah Robinson 2012 Abstract This dissertation examines deaf people’s anxieties about their place in American society and the political economy from 1880 to 1956. My study highlights how deaf people sought to place themselves within mainstream society through their activism to protect and advance their status as citizen-workers. Their activism centered on campaigns against peddling. Those campaigns sought to protect the public image of deaf people as worker-citizens while protecting their language and cultural community. The rhetoric surrounding impostorism and peddling reveals ableist attitudes; anxieties about the oral method supplanting sign language based education for the deaf; fears and insecurities about deaf people’s place in the American economy; class consciousness; and efforts to achieve full social citizenship. Deaf people’s notion of equal citizenship was that of white male citizenship with full access to economic opportunities. Their idea of citizenship extended to the legal and social right to employment and economic self-sufficiency. This is a historical account of the deaf community’s campaign during the late nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century to promote deaf people within American society as equal citizens and to improve their access to economic opportunities.
  • Copyright by Jennifer Nichole Asenas 2007

    Copyright by Jennifer Nichole Asenas 2007

    Copyright by Jennifer Nichole Asenas 2007 The Dissertation Committee for Jennifer Nichole Asenas Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Past as Rhetorical Resource for Resistance: Enabling and Constraining Memories of the Black Freedom Struggle in Eyes on the Prize Committee: Dana L. Cloud, Supervisor Larry Browning Barry Brummett Richard Cherwitz Martha Norkunas The Past as Rhetorical Resource for Resistance: Enabling and Constraining Memories of the Black Freedom Struggle in Eyes on the Prize by Jennifer Nichole Asenas, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2007 Dedication For Jeff and Marc Acknowledgements This dissertation is the product of many kind souls with brilliant minds who agreed to helped me throughout this process. I would like to thank my advisor, Dana Cloud, for being a living example of a scholar who makes a difference. I would also like to thank my committee members: Barry Brummett, Richard Cherwitz, Martha Norkunas, and Larry Browning for contributing to this project in integral and important ways. You have all influenced the way that I think about rhetoric and research. Thank you Angela Aguayo, Kristen Hoerl, and Lisa Foster for blazing trails. Jaime Wright, your inner strength is surpassed only by your kindness. Johanna Hartelius, you have reminded me how special it is to be loved. Lisa Perks, you have been a neighbor in all ways. Amanda Davis, your ability to speak truth to power is inspiring.
  • Disabling Composition: Toward a 21St-Century, Synaesthetic Theory of Writing

    Disabling Composition: Toward a 21St-Century, Synaesthetic Theory of Writing

    Disabling Composition: Toward a 21st-Century, Synaesthetic Theory of Writing Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Melanie Yergeau Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Brenda Brueggemann, Advisor Cynthia Selfe, Advisor H. Lewis Ulman Copyright by Melanie Yergeau 2011 Abstract My dissertation examines the ways in which composition pedagogies have, both in theory and in practice, systematically worked to exclude individuals with disabilities. Persisting in composition studies is the ideological belief that traditional writing and intelligence are somehow inherently linked, that traditional literacy is central to defining one’s intellectual worth. This privileging of composing as print-based, I contend, masks the notion that writing is simply one among many systems of making and conveying meaning, that among our readers are those who cannot always access the messages delivered within print-based texts. I argue that disability studies can enable us to reconceive the rhetorical triangle and what it means to compose. Disability studies allows us to perceive the ways in which traditional writing—and composition studies’ investment in traditional writing— normalizes and has been normalized by our understanding of “the” rhetorical triangle. But disability studies also allows us to regard the ways in which multimodal composing normalizes and has been normalized by our understanding of “the” rhetorical triangle. In order to create the inclusive, radically welcoming pedagogy that so many teacher- scholars strive for, I suggest that we disable composition studies—what we think we know about composers, composing, and composition(s).