THE KU KLUX KLAN: a Study of the American Mind

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE KU KLUX KLAN: a Study of the American Mind THE KU KLUX KLAN: A Study of the American Mind BY JOHN MOFFATT MECKLIN, Fh.D. PROFESSOR OF SOCIOLOGY, DARTMOUTH COLLEGE AUTHOR OF “AN INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL ETHICS,” “DEMOCRACY AND RACE FRICTION” Humanas actiones Deque ridere, Deque flere, nec detestari, sed intelligere. Spinoza. NEW YORK HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY 1924 » COPYRIGHT, 1924, BY KAP.COUST, BRACE AND COMPANY, INC. PRINTED IM THE U. 3. A BY THE QUINN & BODEN COMPANY RAHWAY. N. J 1 '* 1924 V ©C1A778414 To PRESIDENT HOPKINS and the DARTMOUTH ALUMNI WHOSE FRIENDLY AID DID MUCH TO MAKE THIS STUDY POSSIBLE a ••• * •-’ CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I The Rise of the Invisible Empire . 3 II The Rise of the Invisible Empire (Con¬ tinued) .31 III The Spiadow of the Past .... 53 IV Concerning Klan Psychology ... 95 V The Klan and Nativism.127 VI The Klan and Anti-Catholicism . 157- VII Secrecy and Citizenship .... 207 Index.241 THE KU KLTJX KLAN CHAPTER I THE RISE OF THE INVISIBLE EMPIRE In 1873 the Ku Klnx Klan, outside the South, was a synonym for the most sinister and dangerous forces in American life. In the North it was as¬ sociated with clandestine murder and masked re¬ bellion. Who then would have dared to prophesy that within less than half a century this secret, oath-bound order would be revived and spread to every section of the country? Such, however, is the fact. I The modern Klan was organized by Wil¬ liam J. Simmons in 1915, enjoyed a precarious existence for several years, suddenly assumed proportions of national importance in 1920, sur¬ vived the attack of the powerful New York World and a searching investigation by a committee of Congress, and to-day boasts of a following that is numbered in hundreds of thousands, perhaps mil¬ lions. The rise of the modern Klan is the most spectacular of all the social movements in Ameri¬ can society since the close of the World War. It 3 4 THE KU IvLUX KLAN is the object of this and the following chapter to state briefly the main facts in the revival of the so-called “Invisible Empire” of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. i Colonel William Joseph Simmons, the founder of the modern Klan, tells ns that for twenty years he had given thought to the creation of an order standing for a comprehensive Americanism that would blot out Mason and Dixon’s Line. Fasci¬ nated as he was from boyhood by the romantic story of the old Klan of Reconstruction days, which is looked upon in the South as the savior of Southern civilization, he called the new order the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. On October 16,1915, Mr. Simmons, together with some thirty- four friends, three of whom were bona fide mem¬ bers of the old Klan, met and signed a petition for a charter. The charter was granted and on Thanksgiving night, 1915, they gathered “under a blazing, fiery torch” on the top of Stone Moun¬ tain, near Atlanta, and took the oath of alle¬ giance to the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. “And thus,” says Simmons in his THE RISE OF THE INVISIBLE EMPIRE 5 characteristic high-flown language, ‘ * on the moun¬ tain top that night at the midnight hour, while men braved the surging blasts of wild wintry winds and endured a temperature far below freezing [a World reporter was unkind enough to consult the weather bureau record for that night and found the minimum temperature to be only forty-five degrees], bathed in the sacred glow of the fiery cross, the Invisible Empire was called from its slumber of half a century to take up a new task and fulfil a new mission for humanity’s good and to call back to mortal habitation the good angel of practical fraternity among men” (The ABC of the Ku Klux Klan, Ku Klux Klan Press, Atlanta, Georgia). For five years the Klan seems to have passed an uneventful existence, spreading very slowly and making no great impression upon the country. By the early fall of 1918 it was organized in lo¬ calities of the South, especially in Alabama and Georgia, the usual manifestation of its presence being the posting of warnings as in the Recon¬ struction days. In Mobile, Alabama, where a strike was threatened in the government ship¬ yards, masked men leaped from their cars clad in the Klan regalia and forced the driver of a patrol 6 THE KU IvLUX KLAN wagon to surrender the strike leader who was then spirited away. In all these earlier appear¬ ances the Klan directed its activities against alien enemies and those accused of being disloyal, the idlers and slackers, strike leaders, and immoral women. Public sentiment, as in the case of the Mobile incident, seems to have supported the Klansmen, doubtless because most of them repre¬ sented the better element of the communities. There were sporadic references to the Klan dur¬ ing 1919 and the first half of 1920. But by the fall of 1920 the Klan showed a decided increase in its activities. Rumors arose that the Klan was gaining a foothold in the North. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored Peo¬ ple sought to check its spread by asking Post¬ master General Burleson to forbid the Klan the use of the mails. The Klan had, indeed, gained a foothold in New York though its movements were much hampered by the opposition of the police. n The rapid expansion of the order was due to a radical change in its organization in June, 1920. Imperial Wizard Simmons had proven himself to be a capable “spellbinder” but an impractical THE RISE OF THE INVISIBLE EMPIRE 7 dreamer with little organizing ability. His so¬ ciety was in financial straits. At most it num¬ bered only four or five thousand members and was doomed to go the way, apparently, of count¬ less other organizations of a similar nature. At this juncture Mr. Edward Young Clarke and Mrs. Elizabeth Tyler came to the aid of Wizard Sim¬ mons and his struggling society and rescued it from oblivion. They had been associated for years in connection with the Southern Publicity Association and had been successful in drives for funds for such organizations as the Anti-Saloon League, the Roosevelt Memorial Fund, the Near- East Relief, and similar movements. They lis¬ tened to the schemes of Simmons and thought they saw in the Klan financial possibilities. A contract was entered into by which Clarke became head of the propaganda department with com¬ plete charge of organization. Aided by Mrs. Tyler, whose gifts as an organizer and promoter he asserted were second only to his own, they pro¬ ceeded to “sell” the Klan to the American pub¬ lic. Within a little over a year, that is, in the period between June, 1920, when the contract was en¬ tered upon, and October, 1921, when the Klan was investigated by Congress, the Klan had grown 8 THE KU KLUX KLAN from a few thousand to something like 100,000 members. Clarke, aided by Mrs. Tyler, had ap¬ plied to Klan promotion the skill acquired through long experience. The country was di¬ vided into some eight or more “ domains, ” or geographical areas, such as Southeast, Southwest, Northeast, the Mississippi Valley, the Pacific Coast. Each 4 4 domain' 9 was divided into “realms,” or states. The head of the promotion department as a whole was Imperial Kleagle E. Y. Clarke. The head of the “domain” was called a Grand Goblin. The head of the 44 realm,9 9 or state, was called a King Kleagle, and the house- to-house solicitors, or legwork men, were called Kleagles. There can be little doubt that the purely commercial motive had much to do with ; the successful promotion of the Klan. The mem-1 bership fee was ten dollars, which was divided j as follows: four of the ten dollars went to the. Kleagle, or local solicitor, when he signed up a new member; one dollar went into the pocket of the King Kleagle, or state sales-manager; the Grand Goblin, or district salesman, had to be con¬ tent with only fifty cents, while the remaining four dollars and fifty cents went to Atlanta. It will be seen that the inducement to the solicitor was liberal. The purely commercial element has, THE RISE OF THE INVISIBLE EMPIRE 9 however, been overemphasized. It plays a part naturally and inevitably in every such system of promotion. But it must not be forgotten that the commercial motive alone can never explain the marvellous spread of the Klan. This period of remarkable expansion was ac- - companied by a wave of lawlessness and crime which, rightly or wrongly, was associated with the Ku Klux Klan. From October, 1920, to October, 1921, the New York World reported four killings, one mutilation, one branding with acid, forty-one floggings, twenty-seven tar and feather parties, five kidnappings, forty-three individuals warned to leave town or otherwise threatened, fourteen communities threatened by posters, sixteen pa¬ rades of masked men with warning placards. These outbreaks were characterized, generally, by two peculiarities. They were “punishments’’ administered to individuals because of alleged violation of statute law or of the demands of good morals and they were committed after nightfall by parties whose identity was concealed by masks.. The name of the Ku Klux Klan was very generally" associated by the public with these outrages. The New York World and many other papers asserted that for all these outrages the Klan was either directly or indirectly responsible. Emperor Sim- 10 TKE KU KLUX KLAN mons as emphatically denied that the official Klan had anything to do with them.
Recommended publications
  • The Bingham Family from the Old
    THE FILSON CLUB HISTORY QUARTERLY VOL. 61 JANUARY 1987 NO. 1 THE BINGHAM FAMILY: FROM THE OLD SOUTH TO THE NEW SOUTH AND BEYOND WILLIAM E. ELLIS After reading Gone With the Wind in early 1937, Robert Worth Bingham, American Ambassador to Great Britain and son of a Confederate veteran, reacted effusively to Margaret Mitchell's classic novel. He exclaimed : I do not thank you for "Gone With the Wind" -- I bless you .... I know every phase of it all; the poverty and the pride, the gentility, the gracious manners, the romance, the preservation of dignity and high and generous humanity in rags and semi-starvation. 1 If Mitchell's epic synthesized the popular 1930s interpretation of the Civil War and Reconstruction, to Bingham it meant much more. He believed the book exonerated the history of his father's generation and vindicated his own behavior. Here was no rabid racist of the Tom Watson variety. In his public life Bingham epitomized the best of the southern ethos of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He fought against political cor- ruption in the Progressive Era as a young lawyer, mayor, and judge in Louisville, Kentucky. After purchasing the Louisville Courier-Journal in 1918, he continued his crusade against Ken- tucky's Gothic political system until his death in late 1937. More- over, he led the effort to develop a nationwide system of farmer cooperatives in the early twenties3 Bingham never transcended his southern background of the WILLIAM E. ELLIS, PH.D., teaches history at Eastern Kentucky Univer- sity. He wishes to express his gratitude to Eastern Kentucky University and to the National Endowment for the Humanities for travel and research funds used in the preparation of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebels Against the Confederacy: North Carolina’S Unionists Barton A
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07524-5 - Rebels against the Confederacy: North Carolina’s Unionists Barton A. Myers Index More information Index 1984 , 59 , 59n7 Appomattox Campaign, 163 Arkansas abolitionists, 10 , 29 , 30 , 60 , 61 , 203 Pine Bluff, 190 ad valorem, 33 , 33n33 Armstrong, Edward, 93 Adams, John Quincy, 22 , 22n10 Armstrong, James A., 226 , 226n11 Adkinson, Dick, 70 Army of Northern Virginia, 66 , 86 , 87 , Adventures of a Conscript , 8 , 32 , 66 118n89 , 124 , 163 , 198 , 204 , 206 , After Secession , 6 , 252 206n19 , 254 , 259 Alabama, 5n5 , 16 , 98n41 , 217 , 256 soldiers who joined Ku Klux Klan, 184 Montgomery, 16 , 98n41 , 141 , 261 Army of Tennessee, 86 , 163 , 202 Alamance County, 47 , 47n61 , 113 , 114n79 , Asbury, Patrick, 111 , 112n74 116 , 116n83 , 167 , 178 , 181 , 182 , Ash Grove U. S. Cemetery (Maryland), 195 261 , 262 Ashe County, 5 , 6n7 , 13n17 , 32 , 66 , Alamance, Battle of, 47 124n5 , 251 Albemarle region, 35 Asheville News , 77 , 77n52 Albemarle Sound, 128 Asheville Pioneer , 172 , 173 , 185 Alexander County, 69 , 71 , 75 , 92 , 100 , 101 , Askie, Jackson B., 190 , 190n78 104 , 126 Atrocity, 56n3 , 144n46 , 261 Allegheny Mountains, 34 Auman, William T., 6n7 , 67n27 , 87n15 , Allen, Simeon, 17 115n79 , 138n33 , 144n46 Allgood, Harding, 145 Allred, Jacob, 85 , 85n10 , 194 Bacot, R. H., 118 , 118n90 , 248 Allred, Mary, 85 , 85n10 , 194 , 194n86 Baggett, James Alex, 164n5 , 188 Ambrose, Joseph, 113 , 113n76 Bahamas American Party, 45 Nassau, 226 American Revolution, 26 , 26n18 , 32 , 59 , 201 Bailey,
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Reynolds Nelson Education Academic Positions Honors, Prizes
    March, 2019 Scott Reynolds Nelson UGA Athletics Association Professor of History University of Georgia [email protected] Department of History 360 Stanton Way University of Georgia Athens, GA 30606 Athens, Georgia, 30602-1602 Ph: 706-542-2053 Fax: 706-542-2455 http://scottreynoldsnelson.com Education MA & PhD, US History, UNC-Chapel Hill, 1995 BA, (highest honors), History, UNC-Chapel Hill, 1987 Two years undergraduate coursework, Rollins College, 1981-82 Academic Positions Franklin College, University of Georgia UGA AA Professor of History, 2016-present College of William & Mary Legum Professor of History, 2007-2016 Associate Professor of History , 2001-2007 Assistant Professor of History , 1994-2001 Director. s ummer research program. Summer 1994. Intensive history workshop to recruit talented African-American students into history graduate school Honors, Prizes and Awards Visiting Scholar, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, France, 2018 Visiting Professor, University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 2016 Tack Faculty Lecturer, College of William and Mary, 2014 Resident Associate, National Humanities Center, 2012-13 Plumeri Award for Faculty Excellence, College of William & Mary, 2011 Charles Warren Fellow, Harvard University, 2010-11 Patrick Henry Writer’s Fellow, Washington College, 2010-11 (declined) Lloyd Lewis Fellow in American History, Newberry Library, 2009-10 OAH Distinguished Lecturer, Organization of American Historians, 2008-present Legum Professor of the Social Sciences, 2007-2016 Scott Nelson, page 2 Commonwealth of
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Thesis/Research Paper/Faculty Publication from The
    Archived thesis/research paper/faculty publication from the University of North Carolina at Asheville’s NC DOCKS Institutional Repository: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/unca/ University of North Carolina Asheville Reconstructing an Identity: A Critical Reexamination of the Historical Legacy of John Walter Stephens An Advocate for Social Equality During Reconstruction Who Was Assassinated By the Ku Klux Klan A Senior Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of History In Candidacy for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History By Jarrell Hampton Young Asheville, North Carolina November 2015 FOREWARD This work has its roots in an identity crisis and a search for self that began over five years ago. In this journey to discover my paternal ancestry, which is rooted in Caswell County, I found a new appreciation for the past and a calling. This new career path and life-change led me back into academia, and a commitment to complete the task I started in late 1995. This paper is the culmination of nearly two decades of struggle against adversity to achieve the goal of a college education and be an inspiration and better role model for my kids. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper would not have been possible without the information collected by the Caswell County Historical Association (CCHA). I am gracious for access to their archives, their time and hospitality. The astounding record-keeping and collection of transcribed personal narratives that was undertaken by the founding members of the CCHA over the last half century, and their diligence to collect their local family narratives’ and histories’ was not only an academic boon, but I learned much about my own genealogy and ancestral ties in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatham County, NC
    Chatham County, NC Meeting Minutes Board of Commissioners Monday, April 15, 2019 6:00 PM Agriculture & Conference Center Work Session - 3:00 PM - Agriculture & Conference Center Present: 5 - Chair Mike Dasher,Vice Chair Diana Hales,Commissioner Jim Crawford,Commissioner Karen Howard and Commissioner Walter Petty PUBLIC INPUT SESSION Barbara Pugh submitted the following comments: Commissioners, I appreciate your willingness to make this time available to receive input from your constituents on a very emotional issue about the monument in front of the courthouse. I thank you for making the statue safe in the face of perceived challenges and for your continuing support of the North Carolina law regarding memorials of remembrance. Per the demographics given on the Chatham County website, the estimated 2017 census of the county is given as 71,472. The petition for removal of the statue represents slightly more than one percent of the population. The statue is not a symbol of hate nor a celebration of war. In big letters on the statue the words "THIS MONUMENT IS THE GIFT OF THOSE WHO REVERE THE MEMORY OF THE CONFEDERATE SOLDIER." It is a memorial to boys and men who were comrades, fathers, husbands, brothers, uncles, and friends as surely as the other monuments exist today to men for their sacrifices including Union troops, World War I, II, Korea, Vietnam, and currently war in the Middle East. It stands beside the flag of the United States of America. Hopefully its presence can remind us that we should not repeat mistakes made and that war is an awful thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Traitors in the Service of the Lord: the Role of Church and Clergy in Appalachia’S Civil War
    Traitors in the Service of the Lord: The Role of Church and Clergy in Appalachia’s Civil War Master Thesis in Partial Fulfillment of the degree of Master of History By: Sheilah Elwardani Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia December, 2018 Acknowledgments It is hard to list all of the people who supported me through this endeavor but I will attempt to give credit where credit is highly due. The Floyd County Historical Society truly took me under their collective wings and opened full access to the archives which supplied so many vital sources. Special thanks for the support of Rebecca Weeks, Gerald Via and Connie Mitchell. The invaluable information contained in the Stigleman collection was made readily available by the transcription made by Cindy Ryan who completed this huge task in record time, sending me completed letters daily. The support and sacrifice of my family is the only reason this work exists. Laura and Paul Grochowski, my sister and brother-in law, who provided support and childcare continuously, listened to my findings and provided much needed critical feedback. My children sacrificed countless hours with their mother so that I could bury myself in letters and diaries, they eagerly visited churches and graveyards, seeking people associated with this research. My children have since asked me to take them back to the dozens of graveyards where these men rest so that they can place flowers on their graves. Last but not least: the citizens of Floyd County, Virginia; past and present, who continue to make this place special, unique, quirky and deeply rooted to its incredible history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War in Indian Territory, 1861-1865
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2020 The Civil War in Indian Territory, 1861-1865 Zachery Cowsert West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Cowsert, Zachery, "The Civil War in Indian Territory, 1861-1865" (2020). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7553. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7553 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Civil War in Indian Territory, 1861-1865 Zachery C. Cowsert Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History Jason Phillips, Ph.D., Chair Brian Luskey, Ph.D. Tyler Boulware, Ph.D. Max Flomen, Ph.D. Andrew Frank, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, West Virginia 2020 Keywords: American Civil War, Native Americans, Indian Territory Copyright 2020 Zachery C.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Porter, Jr., Douglas Robert
    ABSTRACT PORTER, JR., DOUGLAS ROBERT. “Defying the Destructives”: Confederate Disaffection and Disloyalty in North Carolina’s Northwestern Foothills, 1861-1865. (Under the direction of Susanna Lee.) This thesis considers Confederate disaffection and disloyalty in North Carolina’s northwestern foothills; particularly Forsyth, Stokes, Surry, Yadkin, and Wilkes Counties. In so doing, this thesis adds to a growing collection of social histories and community studies that question Southern loyalties during the Civil War, and suggest that social, religious, and political factors, as well as war weariness contributed to anti-Confederate thought and behavior. Prewar Unionism and overwhelming opposition to secession before mid-April 1861 prevented the foothill counties from wholly devoting themselves to the Confederacy. Consequently, uncommitted foothill citizens rejected the Confederacy once faced with the Richmond government’s unpopular wartime measures. Relentless hardships on the homefront additionally deepened regional dissatisfaction. In reaction, the foothills’ disaffected population viewed the Confederate national government and North Carolina’s original secessionists who encouraged the war as their primary enemies. In response, the region’s anti-Confederates disloyally rebelled against the Richmond government, North Carolina’s pro-war politicians, and the Southern war effort from April 1862 until the end of the war. DEFYING THE “DESTRUCTIVES”: CONFEDERATE DISAFFECTION AND DISLOYALTY IN NORTH CAROLINA’S NORTHWESTERN FOOTHILLS, 1861-1865
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Review
    THE ACADEMICBurke REVIEW FALL 2013 • VOLUME 1, ISSUE NO. 1 Permanent Things by Kyle Moodhe The Loyal Ones: Southern Unionists in Confederate Virginia by Peter Finocchio Taiwan Strait Crisis Behavior by Jackson Wolford NAFTA: All the Fuss by Alexander Mezick V S ER U IT IM ATE VALIB Letter from the Editors Dear Reader, It is with great pride that we present to you the first edition of the Burke Academic Review. This interdisciplinary journal showcases the talent of young conservative academ- ics in their own fields. Too often conservative or right-leaning students produce scholarship that goes unnoticed by their fellow academics. Conservatism is frequently articulated solely as a political ideology. However, true conservatism influences not only one’s orientation in the political sphere but the topics they choose to investigate in their personal studies. This journal seeks to provide such individuals with readership and space to explore a range of aca- demic areas and issues unique to their personal world view. The Burke Academic Review is published by the Burke Society, a conservative philo- sophical and debating society at the University of Virginia. It focuses on providing students of all ideological backgrounds an environment to learn about and discuss conservative thought. The Society takes its name from the 18th century Irish statesman, Edmund Burke, who is considered the father of modern conservatism. Throughout his life, Burke argued against abstractions and supported human dignity by countering theories that attempted to reduce society to simple concepts and easily understood ideas. We invite readers of all political persuasions, moral dispositions, and academic disci- plines to read and critique the works presented in this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION the Eastern Cherokees
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 133 Anthropological Papers, No. 23 The Eastern Cherokees By WILLIAM HARLEN GILBERT, Jr. 169 1 CONTENTS PAGE Preface 175 Introduction 177 Description of the present society 177 The environmental frame 177 General factors 177 Location 178 Climatic factors 182 Inorganic elements 183 Flora and fauna 184 Ecology of the Cherokees 186 The somatic basis 193 History of our knowledge of Cherokee somatology 193 Blood admixture 194 Present-day physical type 195 Censuses of numbers and pedigrees 197 Cultural backgrounds 198 Southeastern traits 198 Cultural approach 199 Present-day Qualla 201 Social units 20 The town 201 The household 202 The clan 203 Economic units 209 Political units 215 The kinship system 216 Principal terms used 216 Morgan's System 227 Kinship distinctions 227 Lineages 235 Preferential mating 238 Familiarity and respect 245 Kinship behavior of pairs 249 General social features 254 Birth and childhood 254 Marriage and adulthood 255 Sickness and death 256 The dance 257 Specific dances 259 The ball game 268 Other games 269 Integration of the present society 272 The functions of the present-day traits 272 Functioning of the family. 272 Functioning of the clan 278 Functioning of the dances - 281 Functions of the kinship usages 281 Social sanctions 284 Magical formulas or prayers - -- 286 171 1 172 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 133 Integration of the present society—Continued. The functions of the present-day traits—Continued. page Functions of the formulas 287 Love
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Worth and Unionism in Post-Civil War North Carolina. (2018) Directed by Dr
    ELLIS, ELIZABETH A., M.A. “Branded as Cain”: Jonathan Worth and Unionism in Post-Civil War North Carolina. (2018) Directed by Dr. Mark E. Elliott. 106 pp. This project examines the political legacy of North Carolina's “inner civil war” that seems largely forgotten in popular memory. How was Unionism defined in North Carolina? Who were the leading Unionists and what did they want? Did North Carolina's Unionist legacy really disappear? If not, what happened to it? Analyzing the political career of Jonathan Worth, a politician with Quaker roots from Randolph County, during Reconstruction helps to answer some of these questions. In 1865, Worth was the first post-war governor to be elected in North Carolina after campaigning on his original Union record. In the social and political struggles that emerged after the Civil War, two distinct versions of Unionism emerged in North Carolina: a Conservative Unionism that drew on the Old South and pre-war understandings of the Constitution versus a Progressive Unionism that embraced Reconstruction changes to the Constitution. Much hung in the balance between these two Unionisms, including civil rights, collective memory of the war experience, and national identity. Worth's understanding of Unionism was Conservative, and thus more sympathetic to former Confederates than former slaves. Despite Progressive Unionist success in 1868, Worth’s Conservative interpretation of Unionism would triumph in the long term, helping to form the basis of a New South Nationalism in North Carolina that outwardly professed loyalty to the United States but was also used to resist federal interference in Jim Crow laws and challenges to the Lost Cause interpretation of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery, Secession, and Sin: Religion and Dissent in the Upcountry South, 1820-1865
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1-1-2013 Slavery, Secession, and Sin: Religion and Dissent in the Upcountry South, 1820-1865 Douglas R. Porter University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Porter, Douglas R., "Slavery, Secession, and Sin: Religion and Dissent in the Upcountry South, 1820-1865" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1427. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1427 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SLAVERY, SECESSION, AND SIN: RELIGION & DISSENT IN THE UPCOUNTRY SOUTH, 1820-1865 A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History The University of Mississippi by DOUGLAS R. PORTER, JR. April 2013 Copyright Douglas R. Porter, Jr. 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Despite decades of scholarship illuminating divisions within Southern society during the nineteenth century, religious historians still imply that white Southerners collectively supported slavery, secession, and the Confederate war effort, choices they believed to be inherently just and holy. This dissertation challenges this notion by highlighting religious dissent in the South during the antebellum and Civil War eras. It argues that antislavery and anti-Confederate white Southerners imagined their lives and times, and justified their social and political choices, with as much religious urgency as their proslavery and pro-Confederate neighbors.
    [Show full text]