UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing Author(s) Doyle, Conor J. Publication date 2017 Original citation Doyle, C. 2017. Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2017, Conor Doyle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/5524 from Downloaded on 2021-10-09T03:33:35Z Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing A thesis presented to the National University of Ireland for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Conor Doyle B.Sc Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland 2017 Research supervisors: Dr. Paul Cotter and Professor Paul O’Toole i “And all this science, I don’t understand. It’s just my job five days a week” Rocket man “No number of sightings of white swans can prove the theory that all swans are white. The sighting of just one black one may disprove it.” Karl Popper ii Table of Contents Declaration .........................................................................................................................................x Abstract ..............................................................................................................................................xi Publications ........................................................................................................................................xiii Glossary of Terms ..............................................................................................................................xiv List of Figures .....................................................................................................................................xviii List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................xxii Chapter 1: Literature review Metagenome-based surveillance and diagnostic approaches to studying the microbial ecology of food production and processing environments 1.0 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................2 1.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................3 1.2 The microbial ecology of crop production and livestock management ..........................4 1.3 Moving inside, biogeography of the food production and processing environment .....6 iii 1.4 Recent advances in understanding the compositional metagenomics of the food production and processing environment ..............................................................................8 1.5 “Terroir”–ising the microbiome .......................................................................................12 1.6 Food safety .......................................................................................................................13 1.7 Microbial Sourcetracking of communities through the food chain ................................14 1.8 Application of shotgun metagenomics and metatranscriptomics ..................................18 1.9 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................20 1.10 References .....................................................................................................................23 Chapter 2: Literature review Anaerobic sporeformers and their significance with respect to milk and dairy products 2.0 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................30 2.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................31 2.2 Different groups of sporeforming bacteria ......................................................................33 2.2.1 Psychrotrophic thermophilic sporeformers ......................................33 2.2.1.1 Aerobic psychrotrophic thermophilic sporeformers ..........................................................................33 2.2.1.2 Anaerobic psychrotrophic thermophilic sporeformers .........................................................................35 iv 2.3 Taxonomy of Clostridium ....................................................................................................36 2.4 Sulphite reducing clostridia ................................................................................................38 2.4.1 Clostridium perfringens .....................................................................40 2.5 Clostridium botulinum .........................................................................................................46 2.5.1 Botulism and dairy powders .............................................................47 2.5.2 Botulism and other dairy products ...................................................51 2.5.3 Regulations ........................................................................................52 2.6 Butyric acid bacteria ...........................................................................................................53 2.6.1 Gas defects in cheeses ......................................................................54 2.7 Importance of Farming Practices ........................................................................................57 2.8 Conclusions .........................................................................................................................61 2.9 References ..........................................................................................................................62 Chapter 3: High-throughput metataxonomic characterization of the raw milk microbiota identifies changes reflecting lactation stage and storage conditions 3.0 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................82 3.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................83 3.2 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................84 3.2.1 Experimental design.......................................................................................84 3.2.2 DNA extraction ...............................................................................................86 v 3.2.3 Quantitative PCR ............................................................................................86 3.2.4 16S rRNA amplicon preparation and high throughput sequencing ..............86 3.2.5 Bioinformatic and statistical analysis ...........................................................87 3.3 Results ..............................................................................................................................88 3.3.1 Sequences ......................................................................................................88 3.3.2 Lactation stage has the most considerable effect on the alpha and beta diversity of the raw milk microbiota .....................................................88 3.3.3 Taxonomic analysis highlights the influence of lactation stage and temperature on the raw milk microbiota ......................................................91 3.3.4 qPCR analysis to estimate total bacterial number in milk .............................93 3.4 Discussion .........................................................................................................................95 3.5 References .......................................................................................................................98 Chapter 4: Compositional metagenomic sequencing highlights the significant influence of seasonal housing and teat preparation on the raw milk microbiota 4.0 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................117 4.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................118 4.2 Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................120 4.2.1 Treatment and Sample collection ..................................................................120 4.2.2 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing .....................................................................125 4.2.3 Bioinformatic and statistical analysis.............................................................126 4.2.4 Quantitative PCR ............................................................................................127 vi 4.3 Results ..............................................................................................................................128 4.3.1 Microbiota alpha and beta diversity of raw milk, teat surface swabs and environmental samples cluster according to habitat .............................128 4.3.2 Network analysis shows
Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Note on the Genus Lactobacillus
    Taxonomic Description template 1 A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: 2 Description of 23 novel genera, emended description 3 of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union 4 of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae 5 Jinshui Zheng1, $, Stijn Wittouck2, $, Elisa Salvetti3, $, Charles M.A.P. Franz4, Hugh M.B. Harris5, Paola 6 Mattarelli6, Paul W. O’Toole5, Bruno Pot7, Peter Vandamme8, Jens Walter9, 10, Koichi Watanabe11, 12, 7 Sander Wuyts2, Giovanna E. Felis3, #*, Michael G. Gänzle9, 13#*, Sarah Lebeer2 # 8 '© [Jinshui Zheng, Stijn Wittouck, Elisa Salvetti, Charles M.A.P. Franz, Hugh M.B. Harris, Paola 9 Mattarelli, Paul W. O’Toole, Bruno Pot, Peter Vandamme, Jens Walter, Koichi Watanabe, Sander 10 Wuyts, Giovanna E. Felis, Michael G. Gänzle, Sarah Lebeer]. 11 The definitive peer reviewed, edited version of this article is published in International Journal of 12 Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 13 1Huazhong Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Key 14 Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China. 15 2Research Group Environmental Ecology and Applied Microbiology, Department of Bioscience 16 Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium 17 3 Dept. of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy 18 4 Max Rubner‐Institut, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Kiel, Germany 19 5 School of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland 20 6 University of Bologna, Dept. of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Bologna, Italy 21 7 Research Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Vrije Universiteit 22 Brussel, Brussels, Belgium 23 8 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, 24 Belgium 25 9 Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 26 10 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 27 11 National Taiwan University, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Species of the Rumen Microbiota
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13118-0 OPEN Characterization of antibiotic resistance genes in the species of the rumen microbiota Yasmin Neves Vieira Sabino1, Mateus Ferreira Santana1, Linda Boniface Oyama2, Fernanda Godoy Santos2, Ana Júlia Silva Moreira1, Sharon Ann Huws2* & Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani 1* Infections caused by multidrug resistant bacteria represent a therapeutic challenge both in clinical settings and in livestock production, but the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes 1234567890():,; among the species of bacteria that colonize the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants is not well characterized. Here, we investigate the resistome of 435 ruminal microbial genomes in silico and confirm representative phenotypes in vitro. We find a high abundance of genes encoding tetracycline resistance and evidence that the tet(W) gene is under positive selective pres- sure. Our findings reveal that tet(W) is located in a novel integrative and conjugative element in several ruminal bacterial genomes. Analyses of rumen microbial metatranscriptomes confirm the expression of the most abundant antibiotic resistance genes. Our data provide insight into antibiotic resistange gene profiles of the main species of ruminal bacteria and reveal the potential role of mobile genetic elements in shaping the resistome of the rumen microbiome, with implications for human and animal health. 1 Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 2 Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological
    [Show full text]
  • ( 12 ) United States Patent
    US009956282B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 9 ,956 , 282 B2 Cook et al. (45 ) Date of Patent: May 1 , 2018 ( 54 ) BACTERIAL COMPOSITIONS AND (58 ) Field of Classification Search METHODS OF USE THEREOF FOR None TREATMENT OF IMMUNE SYSTEM See application file for complete search history . DISORDERS ( 56 ) References Cited (71 ) Applicant : Seres Therapeutics , Inc. , Cambridge , U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS MA (US ) 3 ,009 , 864 A 11 / 1961 Gordon - Aldterton et al . 3 , 228 , 838 A 1 / 1966 Rinfret (72 ) Inventors : David N . Cook , Brooklyn , NY (US ) ; 3 ,608 ,030 A 11/ 1971 Grant David Arthur Berry , Brookline, MA 4 ,077 , 227 A 3 / 1978 Larson 4 ,205 , 132 A 5 / 1980 Sandine (US ) ; Geoffrey von Maltzahn , Boston , 4 ,655 , 047 A 4 / 1987 Temple MA (US ) ; Matthew R . Henn , 4 ,689 ,226 A 8 / 1987 Nurmi Somerville , MA (US ) ; Han Zhang , 4 ,839 , 281 A 6 / 1989 Gorbach et al. Oakton , VA (US ); Brian Goodman , 5 , 196 , 205 A 3 / 1993 Borody 5 , 425 , 951 A 6 / 1995 Goodrich Boston , MA (US ) 5 ,436 , 002 A 7 / 1995 Payne 5 ,443 , 826 A 8 / 1995 Borody ( 73 ) Assignee : Seres Therapeutics , Inc. , Cambridge , 5 ,599 ,795 A 2 / 1997 McCann 5 . 648 , 206 A 7 / 1997 Goodrich MA (US ) 5 , 951 , 977 A 9 / 1999 Nisbet et al. 5 , 965 , 128 A 10 / 1999 Doyle et al. ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this 6 ,589 , 771 B1 7 /2003 Marshall patent is extended or adjusted under 35 6 , 645 , 530 B1 . 11 /2003 Borody U .
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Release 7 7C
    Garrity, et. al., March 6, 2007 Taxonomic Outline of the Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7 March 6, 2007. Part 7 – The Bacteria: Phylum “Firmicutes”: Class “Clostridia” George M. Garrity, Timothy G. Lilburn, James R. Cole, Scott H. Harrison, Jean Euzéby, and Brian J. Tindall F Phylum Firmicutes AL N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3874 Class "Clostridia" N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3875 71 Order Clostridiales AL Prévot 1953. N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3876 Family Clostridiaceae AL Pribram 1933. N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3877 Genus Clostridium AL Prazmowski 1880. GOLD ID: Gi00163. GCAT ID: 000971_GCAT. Entrez genome id: 80. Sequenced strain: BC1 is from a non-type strain. Genome sequencing is incomplete. Number of genomes of this species sequenced 6 (GOLD) 6 (NCBI). N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3878 Clostridium butyricum AL Prazmowski 1880. Source of type material recommended for DOE sponsored genome sequencing by the JGI: ATCC 19398. High-quality 16S rRNA sequence S000436450 (RDP), M59085 (Genbank). N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3879 Clostridium aceticum VP (ex Wieringa 1940) Gottschalk and Braun 1981. Source of type material recommended for DOE sponsored genome sequencing by the JGI: ATCC 35044. High-quality 16S rRNA sequence S000016027 (RDP), Y18183 (Genbank). N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3881 Clostridium acetireducens VP Örlygsson et al. 1996. Source of type material recommended for DOE sponsored genome sequencing by the JGI: DSM 10703. High-quality 16S rRNA sequence S000004716 (RDP), X79862 (Genbank). N4Lid DOI: 10.1601/nm.3882 Clostridium acetobutylicum AL McCoy et al. 1926. Source of type material recommended for DOE sponsored genome sequencing by the JGI: ATCC 824.
    [Show full text]
  • Acclimatisation of Microbial Consortia to Alkaline Conditions and Enhanced Electricity Generation
    Zhang E, Zhaia W, Luoa Y, Scott K, Wang X, Diaoa G. Acclimatisation of microbial consortia to alkaline conditions and enhanced electricity generation. Bioresource Technology 2016, 211, 736-742. Copyright: © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license DOI link to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.115 Date deposited: 06/06/2016 Embargo release date: 04 April 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Acclimatization Acclimatisation of microbial consortia to alkaline conditions itandy enhanced es electricity generation in microbial fuel cells under strong alkaline conditions Enren Zhang*a, Wenjing Zhaia, Yue Luoa, Keith Scottb, Xu Wangc, and Guowang Diaoa a Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou city, 225002, China b School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, United Kingdom c School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China ; Air-cathode microbial fuel cells (MFCs), obtained by inoculatinged with the an aerobic activated sludge, sampled from a brewery waste treatment, were activated over about a one month period, at pH 10.0, to obtain the alkaline MFCs. The alkaline MFCs produced stable power of 118 -2 -3 -2 mW m (or 23.6 W m ) and the a maximum power density of 213 mW m at pH 10.0. The Commented [KS1]: Mention the substrate used performance of the MFCs was further enhanced to produce a stable power of 140 mW m-2 and the a maximum power density of 235 mW m-2 by increasing pH to 11.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioprospecting for Microorganisms and Enzymes with Biorefining Potential
    Bioprospecting for Microorganisms and Enzymes with Biorefining Potential by Laura Frances Lyons Supervisors Dr Kerrie Farrar and Dr Justin Pachebat A thesis submitted at the Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (Aberystwyth University), for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2015 1 2 Declaration This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed ...................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed ..................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ..................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ Word count
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Validly Published Names, Conserved and Rejected Names, And
    Appendix 1. Validly published names, conserved and rejected names, and taxonomic opinions cited in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology since publication of Volume 2 of the Second Edition of the Systematics* JEAN P. EUZÉBY New phyla Alteromonadales Bowman and McMeekin 2005, 2235VP – Valid publication: Validation List no. 106 – Effective publication: Names above the rank of class are not covered by the Rules of Bowman and McMeekin (2005) the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision), and the names of phyla are not to be regarded as having been validly published. These Anaerolineales Yamada et al. 2006, 1338VP names are listed for completeness. Bdellovibrionales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Lentisphaerae Cho et al. 2004 – Valid publication: Validation List Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. no. 98 – Effective publication: J.C. Cho et al. (2004) (2005xxxvi) Proteobacteria Garrity et al. 2005 – Valid publication: Validation Burkholderiales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Vali- List no. 106 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005i) dation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005xxiii) New classes Caldilineales Yamada et al. 2006, 1339VP VP Alphaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006, 1 – Valid publication: Campylobacterales Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al. (2005xv) (2005xxxixi) VP Anaerolineae Yamada et al. 2006, 1336 Cardiobacteriales Garrity et al. 2005, 2235VP – Valid publica- Betaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006, 1VP – Valid publication: tion: Validation List no. 106 – Effective publication: Garrity Validation List no. 107 – Effective publication: Garrity et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Or Kin: Whence Do Bees Obtain Acidophilic Bacteria?
    Molecular Ecology (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05496.x Environment or kin: whence do bees obtain acidophilic bacteria? QUINN S. MC FREDERICK,* WILLIAM T. WCISLO,† DOUGLAS R. TAYLOR,‡ HEATHER D. ISHAK,* SCOT E. DOWD§ and ULRICH G. MUELLER* *Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2401 Speedway Drive #C0930. Austin, TX 78712, USA, †Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama, ‡Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA, §MR DNA (Molecular Research), 503 Clovis Rd., Shallowater, TX 79363, USA Abstract As honey bee populations decline, interest in pathogenic and mutualistic relationships between bees and microorganisms has increased. Honey bees and bumble bees appear to have a simple intestinal bacterial fauna that includes acidophilic bacteria. Here, we explore the hypothesis that sweat bees can acquire acidophilic bacteria from the environment. To quantify bacterial communities associated with two species of North American and one species of Neotropical sweat bees, we conducted 16S rDNA amplicon 454 pyrosequencing of bacteria associated with the bees, their brood cells and their nests. Lactobacillus spp. were the most abundant bacteria in many, but not all, of the samples. To determine whether bee-associated lactobacilli can also be found in the environment, we reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Lactobacillus. Previously described groups that associate with Bombus and Apis appeared relatively specific to these genera. Close relatives of several bacteria that have been isolated from flowers, however, were isolated from bees. Additionally, all three sweat bee species associated with lactobacilli related to flower-associated lactobacilli.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Vaginal Microbiome in Pregnancy
    CHARACTERIZATION OF THE VAGINAL MICROBIOME IN PREGNANCY A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Veterinary Microbiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By ALINE COSTA DE FREITAS © Copyright Aline C. Freitas, February, 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of Department of Veterinary Microbiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9 Canada i ABSTRACT The vaginal microbiome plays an important role in women’s reproductive health.
    [Show full text]
  • Graciete Mary Dos Santos
    GRACIETE MARY DOS SANTOS EFEITO DA VINHAÇA NA PRODUÇÃO BIOLÓGICA DE ÁLCOOIS E ÁCIDOS ORGÂNICOS VOLÁTEIS POR MEIO DE CONSÓRCIO MICROBIANO CAMPINAS 2015 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola GRACIETE MARY DOS SANTOS EFEITO DA VINHAÇA NA PRODUÇÃO BIOLÓGICA DE ÁLCOOIS E ÁCIDOS ORGÂNICOS VOLÁTEIS POR MEIO DE CONSÓRCIO MICROBIANO Dissertação de Mestrado apresentado ao Programa de Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola da Universidade Estadual de Campinas como parte dos requisitos exigidos para obtenção do título de Mestra em Engenharia Agrícola, na Área de Concentração de Água e Solo. Orientador: Prof. Dr. ARIOVALDO JOSÉ DA SILVA Co-Orientadora: Dra. BRUNA DE SOUZA MORAES ESTE EXEMPLAR CORRESPONDE À VERSÃO FINAL DA DISSERTAÇÃO DEFENDIDA PELA ALUNA GRACIETE MARY DOS SANTOS, ORIENTADA PELO PROF. DR. ARIOVALDO JOSÉ DA SILVA. _______________________________________ CAMPINAS 2015 RESUMO No Brasil, o efluente industrial produzido em maior quantidade é a vinhaça, caracterizada por altos níveis de ácidos orgânicos, fósforo, cálcio, potássio e magnésio. O reaproveitamento energético da vinhaça mostra-se como uma alternativa interessante para produção de biocombustíveis ou sub- produtos. Este trabalho avaliou o potencial da vinhaça como fonte de substrato e nutrientes para produção de álcoois e ácidos orgânicos voláteis (AOV) por meio fermentação em batelada utilizando consórcio anaeróbio (lodo de bovinocultura) pré-tratados com choque térmico (TT) e choque ácido- térmico (AT). Foram utilizados dois meios diferentes, de sacarose (S) e de vinhaça (V), sendo a sacarose a principal fonte de carbono. A vinhaça provou ser uma excelente fonte de nutrientes para os microrganismos envolvidos na fermentação butírica, uma vez que a adição de vinhaça melhora significativamente a produção de ácido butírico em comparação com meio de cultura sintético.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mouse Intestinal Bacterial Collection (Mibc) Provides Host-Specific Insight Into Cultured Diversity and Functional Potential of the Gut Microbiota
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 02, 2021 The Mouse Intestinal Bacterial Collection (miBC) provides host-specific insight into cultured diversity and functional potential of the gut microbiota Lagkouvardos, Ilias; Pukall, Rüdiger; Abt, Birte; Foesel, Bärbel U.; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P.; Kumar, Neeraj; Bresciani, Anne Gøther; Martínez, Inés; Just, Sarah; Ziegler, Caroline Total number of authors: 28 Published in: Nature Microbiology Link to article, DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.131 Publication date: 2016 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Lagkouvardos, I., Pukall, R., Abt, B., Foesel, B. U., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Kumar, N., Bresciani, A. G., Martínez, I., Just, S., Ziegler, C., Brugiroux, S., Garzetti, D., Wenning, M., Bui, T. P. N., Wang, J., Hugenholtz, F., Plugge, C. M., Peterson, D. A., Hornef, M. W., ... Clavel, T. (2016). The Mouse Intestinal Bacterial Collection (miBC) provides host-specific insight into cultured diversity and functional potential of the gut microbiota. Nature Microbiology, 1(10), [16131]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.131 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures Under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
    Original Research Paper Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions Annalena Reitz1, Sven Poppert2,3, Melanie Rieker4 and Hagen Frickmann5,6* 1University Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany 2Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland 3Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland 4MVZ Humangenetik Ulm, Ulm, Germany 5Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 6Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany Received: 04 September 2018; accepted: 18 September 2018 Background: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. Methods: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. Results: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a spec- ificity of >95% in all instances.
    [Show full text]