Download (5MB)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download (5MB) This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. The role of the microbiome in rheumatoid arthritis Dargham Bayan Mohsen Hammad A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2020 Keele University I Acknowledgement I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr Daniel Tonge, my lead supervisor, for his support and assistance in completing this study, starting from the thesis proposal up to the thesis manuscript as well as his encouragement. Without his guidance, endless advice and persistent help, this study would not have been possible. I am forever indebted to his kindness, moral support and assistance during the extremely difficult time that I faced throughout these four years. I am grateful to Dr Ray Amith (second supervisor), and I am extremely thankful to Dr Prof David Furness as an advisor of my study. I owe big thanks and gratefulness to Jayne Bromley, Nigel Bowers, Lisa Cartlidge and Chris Bain for providing the facilities throughout the academic study. II Abstract The human microbiome plays a vital role in both health and disease. The evolution of molecular techniques to characterise entire microbiome communities has renewed interest in the involvement of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this thesis, 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing were used to characterise bacterial and fungal DNA present in a range of human and mouse samples. Firstly, characterisation of the microbiome present in blood samples obtained from human RA, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis patients was carried out, relative to healthy controls. Results revealed that the bacterial population in the serum of RA patients was distinct from the healthy state. Through the analysis of paired RA patient blood taken before and three months after treatment, partial microbiome normalisation was identified and was particularly evident in seronegative arthritis patients. Next, the presence and identity of bacterial and fungal communities were investigated in samples of synovial fluid obtained from human RA patients and healthy controls. Our findings revealed that the synovial fluid microbiome of RA could be distinguished from control. Further, IL6, IL71A, IL22, IL23 were elevated in the blood and synovial fluid of RA subjects. The association of IL6 with bacteria and fungi microbiome was observed in the RA synovial fluid. Finally, a characterisation of the bacterial community members presents in the stool, urine, synovial fluid, blood, and serum from collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and control mouse samples were undertaken. Here, we demonstrated that the bacterial community in CIA stool samples was distinct from the control. These data propose that the human blood and synovial fluid microbiome and gut microbiome of the mice is modulated by disease status (RA) and therefore have the III potential to serve as a novel biomarker in RA pathogenesis and treatment response. Further, studies are required to investigate these initial findings. IV Contents 1 Literature Review ........................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Rheumatoid Arthritis ........................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 Definition, symptoms, epidemiology, and aetiology .............................. 3 1.2.2 Pathophysiology and mechanisms underlying disease process .......... 6 1.2.3 Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis ................................................... 10 1.2.4 Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis, therapy, and treatment ................ 13 1.2.5 Ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis .................................... 15 1.3 Immune cells .................................................................................................. 18 1.3.1 Innate immune cells ................................................................................. 18 1.3.2 Adaptive immunity ................................................................................... 22 1.3.2.1 T cells ................................................................................................ 22 1.3.2.2 B cells ............................................................................................... 29 1.3.2.3 Natural killer T cells ......................................................................... 33 1.3.2.4 Gamma delta T cells ........................................................................ 34 1.3.2.5 Mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT) ................................. 35 1.3.2.6 Cytokines .......................................................................................... 36 1.3.2.6.1 IL-6 ................................................................................................. 36 1.3.2.6.2 IL-17 ............................................................................................... 37 1.3.2.6.3 IL-22 ............................................................................................... 39 1.3.2.6.4 IL-23 ............................................................................................... 40 1.4 Microbiome ..................................................................................................... 41 1.4.1 General introduction ................................................................................ 41 1.4.2 Microbiome changes in diseases ........................................................... 42 1.4.2.1 Ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis ............................. 43 V 1.4.2.2 Obesity .............................................................................................. 44 1.4.2.3 Diabetes mellitus ............................................................................. 45 1.4.2.4 Atherosclerosis ................................................................................ 47 1.4.2.5 Inflammatory bowel disease ........................................................... 47 1.4.2.6 Gout .................................................................................................. 48 1.4.2.7 Cancer ............................................................................................... 49 1.4.3 Microbial niches ...................................................................................... 50 1.4.4 Rheumatoid arthritis and dysbiosis ....................................................... 58 1.4.4.1 Gut microbiome and RA .................................................................. 58 1.4.4.2 Oral microbiome and RA ................................................................. 71 1.4.4.3 Blood microbiome and RA .............................................................. 74 1.4.4.4 Microbiome in other tissue sites .................................................... 82 1.4.5 Mouse studies in Autoimmune/inflammatory disorders ...................... 84 1.4.6 16S ribosomal RNA .................................................................................. 86 1.4.7 ITS2 ........................................................................................................... 87 1.4.8 Potential mechanisms of microbial populations in RA pathophysiology ..................................................................................................... 88 1.5 Aims and Objectives ...................................................................................... 92 2 Materials and methods .............................................................................................. 94 2.1 Overview ......................................................................................................... 94 2.2 Samples........................................................................................................... 94 2.2.1 Human blood samples ............................................................................. 95 2.2.2 Human synovial fluid samples................................................................ 98 2.2.3 Mice biological samples (stool, synovial fluid, urine, blood, and serum) 100 2.2.3.1 Biological samples from the mouse study .................................. 101 2.2.3.1.1 Blood Collection ......................................................................... 101 VI 2.2.3.1.2 Synovial fluid collection ............................................................ 102 2.2.3.1.3 Urine and faeces collection ....................................................... 102 2.3 Microbiome characterisation ....................................................................... 103 2.3.1 Microbiome characterisation of human blood and synovial fluid samples 103 2.3.1.1 16S rRNA and ITS2 PCR ................................................................ 104 2.3.1.2 DNA Gel electrophoresis ............................................................... 106 2.3.1.3 Clean-up of PCR product samples ..............................................
Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Note on the Genus Lactobacillus
    Taxonomic Description template 1 A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: 2 Description of 23 novel genera, emended description 3 of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union 4 of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae 5 Jinshui Zheng1, $, Stijn Wittouck2, $, Elisa Salvetti3, $, Charles M.A.P. Franz4, Hugh M.B. Harris5, Paola 6 Mattarelli6, Paul W. O’Toole5, Bruno Pot7, Peter Vandamme8, Jens Walter9, 10, Koichi Watanabe11, 12, 7 Sander Wuyts2, Giovanna E. Felis3, #*, Michael G. Gänzle9, 13#*, Sarah Lebeer2 # 8 '© [Jinshui Zheng, Stijn Wittouck, Elisa Salvetti, Charles M.A.P. Franz, Hugh M.B. Harris, Paola 9 Mattarelli, Paul W. O’Toole, Bruno Pot, Peter Vandamme, Jens Walter, Koichi Watanabe, Sander 10 Wuyts, Giovanna E. Felis, Michael G. Gänzle, Sarah Lebeer]. 11 The definitive peer reviewed, edited version of this article is published in International Journal of 12 Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 13 1Huazhong Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Key 14 Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China. 15 2Research Group Environmental Ecology and Applied Microbiology, Department of Bioscience 16 Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium 17 3 Dept. of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy 18 4 Max Rubner‐Institut, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Kiel, Germany 19 5 School of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland 20 6 University of Bologna, Dept. of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Bologna, Italy 21 7 Research Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Vrije Universiteit 22 Brussel, Brussels, Belgium 23 8 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, 24 Belgium 25 9 Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 26 10 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 27 11 National Taiwan University, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing Author(s) Doyle, Conor J. Publication date 2017 Original citation Doyle, C. 2017. Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2017, Conor Doyle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/5524 from Downloaded on 2021-10-09T03:33:35Z Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing A thesis presented to the National University of Ireland for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Conor Doyle B.Sc Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland 2017 Research supervisors: Dr. Paul Cotter and Professor Paul O’Toole i “And all this science, I don’t understand. It’s just my job five days a week” Rocket man “No number of sightings of white swans can prove the theory that all swans are white. The sighting of just one black one may disprove it.” Karl Popper ii Table of Contents Declaration .........................................................................................................................................x Abstract ..............................................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • ( 12 ) United States Patent
    US009956282B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 9 ,956 , 282 B2 Cook et al. (45 ) Date of Patent: May 1 , 2018 ( 54 ) BACTERIAL COMPOSITIONS AND (58 ) Field of Classification Search METHODS OF USE THEREOF FOR None TREATMENT OF IMMUNE SYSTEM See application file for complete search history . DISORDERS ( 56 ) References Cited (71 ) Applicant : Seres Therapeutics , Inc. , Cambridge , U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS MA (US ) 3 ,009 , 864 A 11 / 1961 Gordon - Aldterton et al . 3 , 228 , 838 A 1 / 1966 Rinfret (72 ) Inventors : David N . Cook , Brooklyn , NY (US ) ; 3 ,608 ,030 A 11/ 1971 Grant David Arthur Berry , Brookline, MA 4 ,077 , 227 A 3 / 1978 Larson 4 ,205 , 132 A 5 / 1980 Sandine (US ) ; Geoffrey von Maltzahn , Boston , 4 ,655 , 047 A 4 / 1987 Temple MA (US ) ; Matthew R . Henn , 4 ,689 ,226 A 8 / 1987 Nurmi Somerville , MA (US ) ; Han Zhang , 4 ,839 , 281 A 6 / 1989 Gorbach et al. Oakton , VA (US ); Brian Goodman , 5 , 196 , 205 A 3 / 1993 Borody 5 , 425 , 951 A 6 / 1995 Goodrich Boston , MA (US ) 5 ,436 , 002 A 7 / 1995 Payne 5 ,443 , 826 A 8 / 1995 Borody ( 73 ) Assignee : Seres Therapeutics , Inc. , Cambridge , 5 ,599 ,795 A 2 / 1997 McCann 5 . 648 , 206 A 7 / 1997 Goodrich MA (US ) 5 , 951 , 977 A 9 / 1999 Nisbet et al. 5 , 965 , 128 A 10 / 1999 Doyle et al. ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this 6 ,589 , 771 B1 7 /2003 Marshall patent is extended or adjusted under 35 6 , 645 , 530 B1 . 11 /2003 Borody U .
    [Show full text]
  • Acclimatisation of Microbial Consortia to Alkaline Conditions and Enhanced Electricity Generation
    Zhang E, Zhaia W, Luoa Y, Scott K, Wang X, Diaoa G. Acclimatisation of microbial consortia to alkaline conditions and enhanced electricity generation. Bioresource Technology 2016, 211, 736-742. Copyright: © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license DOI link to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.115 Date deposited: 06/06/2016 Embargo release date: 04 April 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Acclimatization Acclimatisation of microbial consortia to alkaline conditions itandy enhanced es electricity generation in microbial fuel cells under strong alkaline conditions Enren Zhang*a, Wenjing Zhaia, Yue Luoa, Keith Scottb, Xu Wangc, and Guowang Diaoa a Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou city, 225002, China b School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, United Kingdom c School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China ; Air-cathode microbial fuel cells (MFCs), obtained by inoculatinged with the an aerobic activated sludge, sampled from a brewery waste treatment, were activated over about a one month period, at pH 10.0, to obtain the alkaline MFCs. The alkaline MFCs produced stable power of 118 -2 -3 -2 mW m (or 23.6 W m ) and the a maximum power density of 213 mW m at pH 10.0. The Commented [KS1]: Mention the substrate used performance of the MFCs was further enhanced to produce a stable power of 140 mW m-2 and the a maximum power density of 235 mW m-2 by increasing pH to 11.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Or Kin: Whence Do Bees Obtain Acidophilic Bacteria?
    Molecular Ecology (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05496.x Environment or kin: whence do bees obtain acidophilic bacteria? QUINN S. MC FREDERICK,* WILLIAM T. WCISLO,† DOUGLAS R. TAYLOR,‡ HEATHER D. ISHAK,* SCOT E. DOWD§ and ULRICH G. MUELLER* *Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 2401 Speedway Drive #C0930. Austin, TX 78712, USA, †Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama, ‡Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA, §MR DNA (Molecular Research), 503 Clovis Rd., Shallowater, TX 79363, USA Abstract As honey bee populations decline, interest in pathogenic and mutualistic relationships between bees and microorganisms has increased. Honey bees and bumble bees appear to have a simple intestinal bacterial fauna that includes acidophilic bacteria. Here, we explore the hypothesis that sweat bees can acquire acidophilic bacteria from the environment. To quantify bacterial communities associated with two species of North American and one species of Neotropical sweat bees, we conducted 16S rDNA amplicon 454 pyrosequencing of bacteria associated with the bees, their brood cells and their nests. Lactobacillus spp. were the most abundant bacteria in many, but not all, of the samples. To determine whether bee-associated lactobacilli can also be found in the environment, we reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Lactobacillus. Previously described groups that associate with Bombus and Apis appeared relatively specific to these genera. Close relatives of several bacteria that have been isolated from flowers, however, were isolated from bees. Additionally, all three sweat bee species associated with lactobacilli related to flower-associated lactobacilli.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Vaginal Microbiome in Pregnancy
    CHARACTERIZATION OF THE VAGINAL MICROBIOME IN PREGNANCY A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Veterinary Microbiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By ALINE COSTA DE FREITAS © Copyright Aline C. Freitas, February, 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of Department of Veterinary Microbiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 Canada OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9 Canada i ABSTRACT The vaginal microbiome plays an important role in women’s reproductive health.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures Under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions
    Original Research Paper Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions Annalena Reitz1, Sven Poppert2,3, Melanie Rieker4 and Hagen Frickmann5,6* 1University Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany 2Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland 3Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland 4MVZ Humangenetik Ulm, Ulm, Germany 5Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 6Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany Received: 04 September 2018; accepted: 18 September 2018 Background: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials. Methods: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp. Results: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a spec- ificity of >95% in all instances.
    [Show full text]
  • Thi Na Utaliblat in Un Minune Talk
    THI NA UTALIBLATUS010064900B2 IN UN MINUNE TALK (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 10 , 064 ,900 B2 Von Maltzahn et al . ( 45 ) Date of Patent: * Sep . 4 , 2018 ( 54 ) METHODS OF POPULATING A (51 ) Int. CI. GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT A61K 35 / 741 (2015 . 01 ) A61K 9 / 00 ( 2006 .01 ) (71 ) Applicant: Seres Therapeutics, Inc. , Cambridge , (Continued ) MA (US ) (52 ) U . S . CI. CPC .. A61K 35 / 741 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /0053 ( 72 ) Inventors : Geoffrey Von Maltzahn , Boston , MA ( 2013. 01 ); A61K 9 /48 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; (US ) ; Matthew R . Henn , Somerville , (Continued ) MA (US ) ; David N . Cook , Brooklyn , (58 ) Field of Classification Search NY (US ) ; David Arthur Berry , None Brookline, MA (US ) ; Noubar B . See application file for complete search history . Afeyan , Lexington , MA (US ) ; Brian Goodman , Boston , MA (US ) ; ( 56 ) References Cited Mary - Jane Lombardo McKenzie , Arlington , MA (US ); Marin Vulic , U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS Boston , MA (US ) 3 ,009 ,864 A 11/ 1961 Gordon - Aldterton et al. 3 ,228 ,838 A 1 / 1966 Rinfret (73 ) Assignee : Seres Therapeutics , Inc ., Cambridge , ( Continued ) MA (US ) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 CN 102131928 A 7 /2011 EA 006847 B1 4 / 2006 U .S . C . 154 (b ) by 0 days. (Continued ) This patent is subject to a terminal dis claimer. OTHER PUBLICATIONS ( 21) Appl . No. : 14 / 765 , 810 Aas, J ., Gessert, C . E ., and Bakken , J. S . ( 2003) . Recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis : case series involving 18 patients treated ( 22 ) PCT Filed : Feb . 4 , 2014 with donor stool administered via a nasogastric tube .
    [Show full text]
  • Dairybiota Final Draft.Pdf
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing Author(s) Doyle, Conor J. Publication date 2017 Original citation Doyle, C. 2017. Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2017, Conor Doyle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/5524 from Downloaded on 2021-10-05T14:38:06Z Dairybiota: analysing the microbiota of the dairy chain using next generation sequencing A thesis presented to the National University of Ireland for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Conor Doyle B.Sc Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland 2017 Research supervisors: Dr. Paul Cotter and Professor Paul O’Toole i “And all this science, I don’t understand. It’s just my job five days a week” Rocket man “No number of sightings of white swans can prove the theory that all swans are white. The sighting of just one black one may disprove it.” Karl Popper ii Table of Contents Declaration .........................................................................................................................................x Abstract ..............................................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of the Penile Microbiome of Dorper Rams (Ovis Aries)
    Molecular characterization of the penile microbiome of Dorper rams (Ovis aries) by Auberi Marie Madeleine Courchay Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in the Faculty of Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr H. Lambrecths Co-supervisor: Prof J.T. Burger March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT Characterizing the bacterial community inhabiting the penile environment of Dorper rams may provide insight into the aetiology of ulcerative balanoposthitis (UB), a venereal disease of unknown aetiology, which occurs predominantly in this breed, and that is of great economic importance to the mutton industry in South Africa. Profiling of the bacteria present in the penile environment of healthy and diseased rams was carried out previously using culture-based methods. These culture-based studies identified Mycoplasma mycoides mycoides large colony (MMMLC) and Trueperella pyogenes as potentially contributing to the incidence of UB. Although cultured-based methods have been described as the gold standard for identification of bacteria, many bacteria are uncultivable or grow slowly and poorly in-vitro. The advent of high throughput next generation sequencing (HT-NGS), a culture-independent bacterial identification approach, has offered high coverage and depths in determining the bacterial penile community.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-Rc1
    Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-rc1 Joel Berendzen, Judith Cohn, Nicolas Hengartner, Mira Dimitrijevic, Benjamin McMahon January 06, 2016 Contents 1 Copyright notice 1 2 Introduction to Sequedex 3 2.1 What is Sequedex?............................................3 2.2 What does Sequedex do?.........................................3 2.3 How is Sequedex different from other sequence analysis packages?..................4 2.4 Who uses Sequedex?...........................................4 2.5 How is Sequedex used with other software?...............................5 2.6 How does Sequedex work?........................................5 2.7 Sequedex’s outputs............................................8 3 Installation instructions 15 3.1 System requirements........................................... 16 3.2 Downloading and unpacking for Mac.................................. 16 3.3 Downloading and unpacking for Linux................................. 17 3.4 Downloading and unpacking for Windows 7 or 8............................ 17 3.5 Using Sequedex with Cygwin installed under Windows......................... 19 3.6 Installation and updates without network access............................. 20 3.7 Testing your installation......................................... 20 3.8 Running Sequedex on an example data file............................... 20 3.9 Obtaining a node-locked license file................................... 21 3.10 Installing new data modules and upgrading Sequedex - User-installs.................. 21 3.11 Installing new data modules
    [Show full text]
  • Whitepaper NGS DNA Extraction
    Research in Molecular Microbiology No. 1/1 5: 1 -9 Whitepaper New Developments in DNA Extraction for Microbiome Analysis Michael G. Lorenz – Molzym GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany Summary bacteria. Usually, variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are PCR-amplified using primers that target flanking conserved stretches. The Human Microbiome Project and other Analysis of hundreds of amplicon reads leads to approaches are dedicated to the exploration of assignment of sequences to microbial taxa by the vast complexity of microbial communities comparison with gene libraries [42]. living in association with the human body, including the skin, oral cavity, upper respiratory Independant on the NGS platform modelling of tract, stomach, intestine, and genitourinary tract. microbiota on the grounds of empirical data The aim of these projects is to understand host- involves a series of core steps, including sample microbe interactions with regard to human collection, handling and processing the sample, health and disease. Next Generation Sequenc- DNA extraction, library construction, template ing (NGS) is a powerful analytical tool capable of preparation, sequencing and data analysis [42]. resolving the microbiota in respect to community At each of these steps inaccuracies may occur structure, dynamics, and activity. This overview which, if not considered appropriately, in their discusses new solutions for enrichment and sum can generate meaningless data [42]. This extraction of microbial DNA, removal of irrele- article is dedicated to pre-analytical factors vant non-target host DNA and ways to discrimi- taking influence on the results obtained. nate for DNA from live microbes. Problems associated with DNA extraction will be Keywords: Microbiome - Next Gen Sequencing discussed with special emphasis on the quality and quantity of reflection of community structure - removal of human DNA - removal of extracellu- and trade-off between detection limit and lar microbial DNA - lysis of microbes - DNA-free contamination.
    [Show full text]