DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 Most Wired Survey and Benchmarking Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2012 Most Wired Survey Winners by State Alabama Cullman Regional Medical Center: Innovator Award winner Evergreen Medical Center: Most Wired–Small and Rural St. Vincent’s Hospital–Birmingham: Most Wired University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hospital: Most Wired Washington County Hospital, Chatom: Most Wired–Small and Rural Arizona Banner Health, Phoenix: Most Wired Tucson Medical Center: Most Wired Arkansas Stone County Medical Center, Mountain View: Most Wired–Small and Rural California Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage: Most Wired Kaiser Permanente, Oakland: Most Improved Naval Hospital Lemoore: Most Wired–Small and Rural Rady Children's Hospital–San Diego: Most Wired San Francisco VA Medical Center: Most Wired Sharp HealthCare, San Diego: Most Wired Stanford Hospital and Clinics: Most Wired University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento: Most Wired University of California, San Diego Health System: Most Wired VA Palo Alto Health Care System: Most Wired VA Sierra Pacific Network, Mare Island: Most Wired Colorado Denver Health and Hospital Authority: Most Wired Poudre Valley Health System, Fort Collins: Most Wired Connecticut Hartford Hospital: Most Wired Middlesex Health System, Middletown: Most Wired MidState Medical Center, Meriden: Most Wired Saint Francis Care, Hartford: Most Wired William W. Backus Hospital, Norwich: Most Wired Yale New Haven Health System: Most Wired Delaware Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington: Most Wired District of Columbia Washington, D.C. VA Medical Center: Most Wired Florida Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables: Most Wired Florida Hospital, Orlando: Most Wired Martin Health System, Stuart: Most Wired Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood: Most Wired NCH Healthcare System, Naples: Most Wired Georgia Emory Healthcare, Atlanta: Most Wired Grady Health System, Atlanta: Most Wired Northeast Georgia Health System, Gainesville: Most Wired Piedmont Fayette Hospital, Fayette: Most Wired Piedmont Hospital, Atlanta: Most Wired Tanner Health System, Carrollton: Most Improved Idaho Gritman Medical Center, Moscow: Most Wired Syringa Hospital and Clinics, Grangeville: Most Wired–Small and Rural Illinois Advocate Health Care, Oak Brook: Most Wired Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago: Most Wired Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Schaumburg: Most Wired Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana: Most Wired Kewanee Hospital: Most Wired–Small and Rural Kishwaukee Community Hospital, DeKalb: Most Wired–Small and Rural Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood: Most Wired Methodist Medical Center of Illinois, Peoria: Most Wired NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston: Most Wired Northwest Community Healthcare, Arlington Heights: Most Wired Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago: Most Wired OSF Healthcare System, Peoria: Most Wired Rush Oak Park Hospital, Oak Park: Most Wired Rush University Medical Center, Chicago: Most Wired Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System, Mattoon: Most Wired SwedishAmerican Health System, Rockford: Most Improved University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago: Most Wired Indiana Community Health Network, Indianapolis: Most Wired Deaconess Health System, Newburgh: Most Wired IU Health, Indianapolis: Most Wired Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis: Most Wired Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka: Most Wired Union Hospital Clinton: Most Wired Union Hospital, Terre Haute: Most Wired Iowa Broadlawns Medical Center, Des Moines: Most Wired–Small and Rural Fort Madison Community Hospital: Most Wired Genesis Health System, Davenport: Most Wired Henry County Health Center, Mount Pleasant: Most Wired Iowa Health System, Des Moines: Most Wired Mary Greeley Medical Center, Ames: Most Improved Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids: Most Wired University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City: Most Wired Kansas Lawrence Memorial Hospital: Most Wired Stormont–Vail Healthcare, Topeka: Most Improved University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City: Most Wired Kentucky King’s Daughters Health System, Ashland: Most Wired Marshall County Hospital, Benton: Most Wired–Small and Rural Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital, Ashland: Most Wired Louisiana Lafayette General Medical Center: Most Wired Opelousas General Health System: Most Wired–Small and Rural Maine Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor: Most Wired Franklin Memorial Hospital, Farmington: Most Wired Maine Medical Center, Portland: Most Wired Acadia Hospital, Bangor: Most Wired Maryland MedStar Health, Columbia: Most Wired Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury: Most Wired Massachusetts Baystate Health, Springfield: Most Wired Berkshire Health Systems, Pittsfield: Most Wired Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston: Most Wired Boston Children's Hospital: Most Wired Hallmark Health, Melrose: Most Wired HealthAlliance Hospitals, Leominster: Most Wired Lowell General Hospital: Most Wired Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester: Most Wired South Shore Hospital, Weymouth: Most Wired Michigan Aleda E. Lutz VAMC, Saginaw: Most Wired Allegiance Health, Jackson: Most Improved Battle Creek VA Medical Center: Most Wired Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak: Most Wired Bronson Battle Creek: Most Wired Carson City Hospital: Most Wired–Small and Rural Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, Rochester: Most Wired Detroit Medical Center: Most Wired John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit: Most Wired Memorial Healthcare, Owosso: Most Wired Metro Health, Wyoming: Most Wired Munson Medical Center, Traverse City: Most Improved McLaren Northern Michigan, Petoskey: Most Wired VA Region 3, Office of Information Technology, Ann Arbor: Most Wired Veterans Partnership Network (VISN 11) Healthcare Network, Ann Arbor: Most Wired Minnesota HealthPartners, Bloomington: Most Wired Mayo Clinic, Rochester: Most Wired Mississippi Magnolia Regional Health Center, Corinth: Most Wired–Small and Rural North Mississippi Health Services, Tupelo: Most Wired Missouri Bothwell Regional Health Center, Sedalia: Most Wired Citizens Memorial Hospital, Bolivar: Most Wired CoxHealth, Springfield: Most Improved Heartland Health, Saint Joseph: Most Improved Mercy, Chesterfield: Most Wired North Kansas City Hospital: Most Improved Truman Medical Centers, Kansas City: Most Wired University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia: Most Wired Nebraska Nemaha County Hospital, Auburn: Most Wired Thayer County Health Services, Hebron: Most Wired–Small and Rural New Hampshire Concord Hospital, Concord: Most Wired Elliot Health System, Manchester: Most Wired Exeter Health Resources: Most Wired New London Hospital: Most Wired–Small and Rural New Jersey Atlantic Health System, Morristown: Most Wired CentraState Healthcare System, Freehold: Most Wired Hackensack University Medical Center: Most Wired Hunterdon Healthcare System, Flemington: Most Wired Meridian Health, Neptune City: Most Wired Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick: Most Wired Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at Hamilton: Most Improved Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, New Brunswick: Most Wired St. Joseph's Healthcare System, Paterson: Most Wired Valley Health System, Ridgewood: Most Wired Trinitas Regional Medical Center, Elizabeth: Most Improved New Mexico University of New Mexico Hospitals, Albuquerque: Most Wired New York Arnot Ogden Medical Center, Elmira: Most Wired Continuum Health Partners, New York: Most Wired Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn: Most Wired Massena Memorial Hospital: Most Wired Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York City: Most Wired Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx: Most Wired New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York City: Most Improved North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset: Most Wired Southampton Hospital: Most Wired–Small and Rural St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse: Most Wired Stony Brook University Medical Center: Most Wired VA Northeast Region 4, Albany: Most Wired Winthrop–University Hospital, Mineola: Most Wired North Carolina Alamance Regional Medical Center, Burlington: Most Wired Ashe Memorial Hospital, Jefferson: Most Wired–Small and Rural Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte: Most Wired Charles George VA Medical Center, Asheville: Most Wired FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Pinehurst: Most Wired Mission Hospital, Asheville: Most Wired Vidant Health, Greenville: Most Wired Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg: Most Wired North Dakota Altru Health System, Grand Forks: Most Wired Trinity Health, Minot: Most Improved Ohio Christ Hospital, Cincinnati: Most Wired Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center: Most Wired Fisher–Titus Medical Center, Norwalk: Most Wired MedCentral–Mansfield Hospital: Most Wired MedCentral–Shelby Hospital: Most Wired Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus: Most Wired Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus: Most Wired OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus: Most Wired OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin: Most Wired Samaritan Regional Health System, Ashland: Most Wired–Small and Rural Summa Akron City and St. Thomas Hospitals, Akron: Most Wired TriHealth, Cincinnati: Most Wired Oklahoma Norman Regional Health System: Most Improved Oklahoma Heart Hospital, Oklahoma City: Most Wired Oklahoma Heart Hospital South, Oklahoma City: Most Wired Unity Health Center, Shawnee: Most Wired Oregon Columbia Memorial Hospital, Astoria: Most Wired Pennsylvania Chester County Hospital and Health System, West Chester: Most Improved Crozer–Keystone Health System, Springfield: Most Wired Geisinger Health System, Danville: Most Wired Grand View Hospital,
Recommended publications
  • Tobacco Settlement Report: FY 2017-18

    Tobacco Settlement Report: FY 2017-18

    THE TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY JULY 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2018 Tom Wolf Teresa D. Miller Governor Secretary of Human Services THE TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY JULY 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018 Page Executive Summary 3 Uncompensated Care for Hospitals (2017-2018) 4 Attachment 1 – Hospitals eligible for tobacco payment 7 Attachment 2 – Hospitals qualified to receive UC payments 12 Attachment 3 – Hospitals qualified to receive EE payments 16 Attachment 4 – Hospitals affiliations for tobacco payments 19 Attachment 5 – Hospitals with potential DSH-UPL issues 24 Attachment 6 – Total expenditures for each fiscal year 25 Attachment 7 – Uncompensated care (UC) payment method 28 Home and Community-Based Services to Older Pennsylvanians 30 Chart 1 - Aging Waiver Allocation Direct Service Costs 31 Table 1 - Summary of the Aging Waiver 32 Table 2 - Number of Applicants 33 Table 3 - Funded Individuals (Aging Waiver Program) 35 Table 4 - Total Expenditure by PSA 37 Table 5 - Aging Waiver Costs, Number of Claims and Consumers by Service Category for Fiscal Year 2017-2018 39 Table 6 - Costs, Number of Claims and Number of Unduplicated Consumers by Service Category for FY 2017-2018 40 Table 7 - Average State and Federal Costs per Individual 40 Medical Assistance for Workers with Disabilities (MAWD) 41 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania joined 45 other states in November 1998 in a master settlement agreement (MSA) with the tobacco industry, estimated to total $206 billion over the first 25 years. Pennsylvania’s share was estimated to be about $11 billion between the years 2000 and 2025.
  • Health Care Strategic Planning

    Health Care Strategic Planning

    HEALTH Introducing CARE STRATEGIC . PLANNING ACCORD LIMITED HEALTH CARE STRATEGIC PLANNING 1 ACCORD LIMITED HEALTH CARE STRATEGIC PLANNING TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to ACCORD LIMITED ......................................................... 3 StrategicSTRATEGIC Planning PLANNING ................................ .................................................................................................................... 4 ACCORD’s’s Approach APPROACH ................................ ................................................................................................................... 6 WhatWHAT Differentiates DIFFERENTIATES ACCORD ................................ACCORD ............................................................................... 13 A PromisePROMISE to TOour ClientsOUR CLIENTS ................................ .............................................................................................. 14 ACCORD’s’s Other OTHER Services SERVICES ................................ ................................................................................................. 15 ACCORD’s’s Health HEALTH Care CARE Clients CLIENTS ................................ ........................................................................... 16 ACCORD’s’s Consulting CONSULTING Team ................................TEAM ...................................................................................... 2220 2 ACCORD LIMITED HEALTH CARE STRATEGIC PLANNING GENERAL INFORMATION ACCORD LIMITED (ACCORD) is
  • Community Health Improvement Plan 2019-2021

    Community Health Improvement Plan 2019-2021

    Community Health Improvement Plan 2019-2021 Patricia Shouse, President, Trinity Health Foundation, and Vice President Patient and Community Advocacy Daniel Joiner, Director, Community Engagement Sherri Behr DeVrieze, Community Health Program Coordinator TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Introduction Introduction 3-13 Part 2: Community Health Improvement Plan Community Health Improvement Plan Overview 14 Diabetes, Nutrition, Physical Activity & Weight 15-19 Heart Disease & Stroke 20-23 Mental/Behavioral Health & Substance Abuse 24-29 Cancer 30-32 Access to Healthcare Services 33-38 2 | P a g e Part 1: Introduction Introduction How We Got There The Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) was conducted by UnityPoint Health – Trinity and its partners in order to identify the greatest health needs in the community and to create and operationalize a strategy to best meet these needs. Trinity’s strategy development is known as the Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). Trinity has been involved in the assessment of its community’s health priorities for the past 18 years through its efforts in the establishment of a CHNA for the Quad Cities area beginning in 2002. In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted by Congress with the goal of improving access to healthcare services for Americans. As part of the Affordable Care Act, non-profit hospitals are required to submit a Community Health Needs Assessment and Improvement Plan every three years. In addition to our commitment to serving the needs of the community, Trinity’s CHIP also fulfills these regulatory requirements. In late 2014, UnityPoint Health - Trinity partnered with the Quad City Health Initiative and other community partners to begin the process of collecting data and planning the operationalization of the Community Health Improvement Plan for 2019-2021.
  • Participants List Through January 2020

    Participants List Through January 2020

    REGIONAL GROUP NAME CITY STATE CENTER HEALTH SYSTEM(s) CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Montreal, QC Canada CHUM CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Gatineau Canada CISSSO CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Edmonton, AB Canada Covenant Health - Grey Nuns Hospital CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Kentville, Nova Scotia Canada Nova Scotia Health Authority CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Toronto, Ontario Canada Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Thunder Bay Canada Thunder Bay ReGional Health Sciences Centre CANADIAN VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE Toronto Canada Toronto General Hospital CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) BurlinGton NC Alamance ReGional Medical Center Cone Health System; Carolinas Healthcare CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) Anderson SC AnMed Health Medical Center (AnMed Health) CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) Concord NC Atrium Health Carrabus The Charlotte-MecklenburG Hospital Authority d/b/a Atrium Health CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) Charlotte NC Atrium Health Pineville The Charlotte-MecklenburG Hospital Authority d/b/a Atrium Health CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) Monroe NC Atrium Health Union The Charlotte-MecklenburG Hospital Authority d/b/a Atrium Health CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) louidiana SC Beaufort Memorial Hospital CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) Hickory NC Catawba Valley Medical Center CAROLINAS VASCULAR QUALITY GROUP (CVQG) Greensboro NC Cone Health Heart & Vascular Center Cone Health System; Carolinas Healthcare
  • Residency Match List 2021

    Residency Match List 2021

    PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE 2021 Residency List – Philadelphia Campus Anesthesiology (8) Family Medicine (con’t) Cook County Health and Hosp Sys, IL Jefferson Health - Northeast, PA (2) Hospital of the Univ of Pennsylvania, PA Lankenau Medical Center, PA Indiana University SOM, IN McLaren Health Care, MI Penn State Hershey Medical Center, PA Mike O'Callaghan Federal Hospital, Tower Health/Reading Hospital, PA (2) Nellis Air Force Base/Univ of Nevada UCLA Medical Center, CA School of Medicine, NV (2)* UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals, PA Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL* NCC - Fort Belvoir Community Hosp, VA* Emergency Medicine (28) Northwestern McGaw Lake Forest, IL Albert Einstein Medical Center, PA (2) OhioHealth-Doctors Hospital, OH Capital Health Regional Medical Center, NJ OhioHealth-Grant Medical Center, OH Christiana Care, DE Penn Medicine-Lancaster General Hosp, PA CMSRU/Cooper University Hospital, NJ Penn State Hershey Medical Center, PA Crozer-Chester Medical Center, PA (3) Puyallup Tribal Health Authority, WA Florida Atlantic University Rowan University SOM, NJ (2) -Charles E. Schmidt COM, FL Rutgers-RWJUH Somerset, NJ Geisinger Health System, PA St. Lukes Hospital, PA Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, CA St. Lukes Hospital-Anderson, PA (2) HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani GME Suburban Community Hospital, PA -Oak Hill, FL Univ of Massachusetts Med School, MA Inspira Health Network, NJ (2) UPMC McKeesport, PA Jefferson Health - Northeast, PA (2) UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, PA Jefferson Health NJ - Rowan SOM, NJ (2) UPMC Williamsport,
  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Annual Report 2012

    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Annual Report 2012

    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Annual Report 2012 Genesis Health System exists to provide compassionate, quality health service to all those in need. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Inpatients Served 4 Inpatient Program Discharge Data 5 Day Rehabilitation 6 Brain Injury Program-Inpatient 7 Earning Recognition for Brain Injury Programs 8 Brain Injury Program-Outpatient 9 Constraint Induced Movement Therapy 10 Spinal Cord System of Care - Inpatient 11 Spinal Cord System of Care - Outpatient 12 Professional Development Program 13 GOPEDS-Pediatric Program 14 Outpatient Service Locations 15 Power Sports Performance 16 Medical Services 17 New Program - Concussion Management 18 New Program - Wheelchair Clinic 19 Awards/Certifications 20 2 Introduction The Genesis Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service Line continues to offer the largest and most complete inpatient rehabilitation program in the State of Iowa. The only CARF accredited Outpatient Brain Injury Program and Spinal Cord System of Care Program is offered at Genesis. In addition, the Inpatient Brain Injury Program is one of only two CARF accredited programs in the State to offer services to adult, adolescent and pediatric patients who have experienced a brain injury. During FY 2012, referrals to the inpatient program increased by nearly seven percent with the majority of the increase coming from outside referral sources such as the University of Iowa. Our Outpatient Pediatric Program, “Go Peds”, saw a 32% increase as compared to the previous year. These continued increases year after year, attest to the fact that the Genesis physical medicine and rehabilitation programs are highly valued. Reflecting back on FY 2012 we see many improvements to our programs.
  • Genesis Health System 2014 Audit Report

    Genesis Health System 2014 Audit Report

    Genesis Health System and Related Organizations Consolidated Financial Report June 30, 2014 Contents Independent Auditor's Report 1 – 2 Financial Statements Consolidated balance sheets 3 – 4 Consolidated statements of operations 5 Consolidated statements of changes in net assets 6 Consolidated statements of cash flows 7 – 8 Notes to consolidated financial statements 9 – 41 Independent Auditor’s Report To the Audit and Compliance Committee Genesis Health System Davenport, Iowa Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Genesis Health System and related organizations (System) which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for the years then ended and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Misericordia Assurance Company, Ltd., a consolidated subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets constituting approximately 3% and 4%, respectively, of the related consolidated total assets as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, and total revenue constituting approximately 1% of consolidated total revenue for each of the years then ended.
  • And Family-Centered Care Through Learning, Engagement and Discovery

    And Family-Centered Care Through Learning, Engagement and Discovery

    geisinger.org Symposium on Enhancing patient- and family-centered care through learning, engagement and discovery Tue., June 14, and Wed., June 15, 2016 The Henry Hood Center for Health Research Geisinger Medical Center campus This conference is supported through a Eugene Washington Engagement Patient- Centered Outcomes Research Initiative (PCORI) Award (EAIN-3012) and the Geisinger Scientific Research Committee (SRC-S-52). Symposium on Enhancing patient- and family-centered care through learning, engagement and discovery All across the United States, healthcare professionals are tackling the challenges of enhancing the quality of patient- and family- centered care. To meet those challenges, they have to form true partnerships with their colleagues, their patients and family caregivers. At Geisinger, we’re embracing these challenges. We’re working with our healthcare professionals to help them partner with their colleagues, patients and patient families, all with the aim of improving the quality and the experience of care. And we’re asking patients and their families to collaborate with Geisinger as co-improvers, co-investigators and co-innovators in our drive to realize this overarching aim. Today, we are excited to welcome you to this symposium: Enhancing Patient- and Family-Centered Care through Learning, Discovery, and Engagement. Over the next two days, we invite you to join us in exploring effective strategies for fulfilling Geisinger’s commitment to putting — and keeping — patients at the center of all we do. Our goal is to make this symposium a stunning success, and without your participation, we will not be able to attain this goal. Please accept our sincere thanks for your participation and for your past, present and future contributions to making Geisinger the best.
  • 2018 Community Health Assessment Report Scott County & Muscatine County, Iowa Rock Island County, Illinois

    2018 Community Health Assessment Report Scott County & Muscatine County, Iowa Rock Island County, Illinois

    2018 Community Health Assessment Report Scott County & Muscatine County, Iowa Rock Island County, Illinois Study Sponsored by: Community Health Care, Inc. Genesis Health System Muscatine County Board of Health Quad City Health Initiative Rock Island County Health Department Scott County Health Department UnityPoint Health – Trinity Funded by: Genesis Health System UnityPoint Health – Trinity Prepared by: Professional Research Consultants, Inc. 11326 P Street Omaha, NE 68137-2316 www.PRCCustomResearch.com 2017-0858-02 FINAL © September 2018 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Introduction 9 Preface 10 Project Goals 10 Acknowledgments 11 Methodology 13 Summary of Findings 22 Significant Health Needs of the Community 22 Summary of Qualitative Community Health Assessment Findings 24 Summary Tables 25 Community Description 46 Population Characteristics 47 Total Population 47 Urban/Rural Population 49 Age 50 Race & Ethnicity 52 Linguistic Isolation 55 Social Determinants of Health 57 Poverty 57 Education 60 Employment 61 Housing Issues 62 Food Insecurity 68 Social Services 70 Health Literacy 72 Problems Facing Families in the Community 75 Health Disparities 76 Social Determinant Risk & Health 76 Income & Health 77 General Health Status 78 Overall Health Status 79 Mental Health 81 Evaluation of Mental Health Status 82 Depression 83 Stress 85 Suicide 87 Mental Health Treatment 90 2 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Perceived Ease of Obtaining Mental Health Services 94 Death, Disease, & Chronic Conditions 96 Leading Causes of Hospital Visits
  • Tax Exempt Organizations Awaiting State Payment As of July 12

    Tax Exempt Organizations Awaiting State Payment As of July 12

    Tax Exempt Organizations Awaiting State Payment as of July 12 ,2010 Note: The “tax exempt” status reflected in the records is a federal status where “non-for-profit” is a State status (which they do not track in their records). All tax exempt organizations are non-for- profits, but not all non-for-profits are tax exempt. Source: Illinois Office of the Comptroller, Daniel W. Hynes via Freedom of Information Act Request submitted by Heartland Alliance for Human Needs & Human Rights. VENDOR NAME AMT TOTAL $490,314,860.75 100 BLACK MEN OF ALTON INC 10,000.00 1033 AMBULANCE SERVICE LTD 12,123.90 1ST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 3,859.89 21ST CENTURY URBAN SCHOOLS 7,041.68 40 NORTH-88 WEST INC 15,300.00 826CHI INC NFP 4,110.00 A KNOCK AT MIDNIGHT NFP 77,846.00 A SILVER LINING FOUNDATION 45,000.00 ABC COUNSELING & FAMILY SVC 25,126.60 ABILITIES PLUS INC 329,215.88 ABOUTABJ COMMUNITY FACE THEATRE SERVICES COLLECTIVE INC 31,483.00 ABRAHAM LINCOLN MEMORIAL 2,840.00 HOSP 25,473.18 ACADEMICABUNDANT DEVELOPMENT NEW LIFE CHURCH 1,548.35 INSTITUTE 77,040.00 ACADEMY FOR URBAN 83,330.00 ACADEMY OF OUR LADY 1,105.68 ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH 4,148,064.94 ACCESS LIVINGDUPAGE OF METRO CHICAGO 28,349.10 ACCESS SERVICES OF NORTHERN IL 269,778.73 ACCESSIBLE CONTEMPORARY 300.00 MUSIC 2,530.00 ACHIEVEMENT UNLIMITED INC 2,460,902.37 ACTORS WORKSHOP THEATRE 2,710.00 ADA S MCKINLEY CMNTY SVCS INC 4,230,966.75 ADLERADAMS SCHOOLELECTRIC OF COOPERATIVE PROFESSIONAL 58,328.81 124,958.51 ADULTADOPTIONS AND CHILDUNLIMITED REHAB INC CENTER 142,657.09 ADULTHOOD TRANSITION CENTER
  • 2018 Community Health Assessment Report

    2018 Community Health Assessment Report

    2018 Community Health Assessment Report Scott County & Muscatine County, Iowa Rock Island County, Illinois Study Sponsored by: Community Health Care, Inc. Genesis Health System Muscatine County Board of Health Quad City Health Initiative Rock Island County Health Department Scott County Health Department UnityPoint Health – Trinity Funded by: Genesis Health System UnityPoint Health – Trinity Prepared by: Professional Research Consultants, Inc. 11326 P Street Omaha, NE 68137-2316 www.PRCCustomResearch.com FINAL 2017-0858-02 © September 2018 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Introduction 9 Preface 10 Project Goals 10 Acknowledgments 11 Methodology 13 Qualitative Community Health Assessment Methodology 19 Summary of Findings 20 Significant Health Needs of the Community 20 Summary of Qualitative Community Health Assessment Findings 22 Summary Tables 23 Public Comment & Feedback 44 Community Description 45 Population Characteristics 46 Total Population 46 Urban/Rural Population 48 Age 49 Race & Ethnicity 51 Linguistic Isolation 54 Social Determinants of Health 56 Poverty 56 Education 59 Employment 60 Housing Issues 61 Food Insecurity 67 Social Services 69 Health Literacy 71 Problems Facing Families in the Community 74 Health Disparities 75 Social Determinant Risk & Health 75 Income & Health 76 General Health Status 77 Overall Health Status 78 Mental Health 80 Evaluation of Mental Health Status 81 Depression 82 Stress 84 2 COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Suicide 86 Mental Health Treatment 89 Perceived Ease of Obtaining Mental Health
  • Health Care Improvement Foundation Building Partnerships for Better Health Care Est

    Health Care Improvement Foundation Building Partnerships for Better Health Care Est

    Health Care Improvement Foundation Building Partnerships For Better Health Care Est. 1980 Who We Are The Health Care Improvement Foundation (HCIF) is an independent nonprofit organization that drives high value health care advancements through stakeholder collaboration and targeted quality improvement initiatives. HCIF supports a vision of a responsive, coordinated health care delivery system that fulfills the needs of patients and consumers, and achieves better health. Our Approach HCIF Funding HCIF's approach to quality improvement is based on the core value that collaboration at the local level is the key to effective and sustained quality improvement. Our experience provides evidence that by working together with peers, participating organizations and clinicians accelerate their improvement strategies farther and faster than by Government Grants working on their own. Facilitation and Collaboration Hospitals & Health Systems Process Improvement Data Analysis and Management Corporate Sources & Payers Relationship Building Foundations & Project Management and Evaluation Individual Donors Our Teams Population & Clinical Quality & Patient Safety Community Health Fostering collaborations among Strengthening connections between health care providers to improve health care and communities to quality and safety. promote health, well-being, and equity. Featured Projects The Partnership for Patient Care (PPC) is a collaboration between Partnership for Independence Blue Cross and the Philadelphia region’s hospitals to Patient Care jointly fund