Empire of Liberty the Oxford History of the United States David M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Empire of Liberty the Oxford History of the United States David M Empire of Liberty The Oxford History of the United States David M. Kennedy, General Editor robert middlekauff THE GLORIOUS CAUSE The American Revolution, 1763–1789 gordon s. wood EMPIRE OF LIBERTY A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 daniel walker howe WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT The Transformation of America, 1815–1848 james m. mcpherson BATTLE CRY OF FREEDOM The Civil War Era david m. kennedy FREEDOM FROM FEAR The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 james t. patterson GRAND EXPECTATIONS The United States, 1945–1974 james t. patterson RESTLESS GIANT The United States from Watergate to Bush v. Gore george c. herring FROM COLONY TO SUPERPOWER U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776 EMPIRE OF LIBERTY A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 GORDON S. WOOD 1 2009 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wood, Gordon S. Empire of liberty : a history of the early Republic, 1789–1815 / Gordon S. Wood. p. cm. — (Oxford history of the United States) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-503914-6 1. United States—Civilization—1783–1865. 2. United States—Politics and government—1789–1815. I. Title. E310.W87 2009 973.4—dc22 2009010762 123456789 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To My Family This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments A project that has gone on as long as this one acquires a large number of debts, so many that it is dangerous to list any for fear of leaving someone out. For institutional support I am indebted to the Woodrow Wilson Center and the Huntington Library, both of which offered time off from teaching to work on the book. In addition, my home institution, Brown University, gave me several leaves that allowed me opportunities to do research and writing. My students, both graduate and undergraduate, have been a continual source of stimulation, mainly by compelling me to clarify my ideas and arguments. A number of colleagues have read portions of the manuscript— Michael Les Benedict, Steven Calabresi, Robert Gross, Bruce Mann, R. Kent Newmyer, and Steve Presser—and I am deeply indebted for their aid and corrections. Several friends suffered through the entire long manuscript—Richard Buel Jr., Patrick T. Conley, and Joanne Free- man—and I am eternally grateful for their taking on the task and for their helpful comments. Pat Conley in particular brought to bear on the manuscript not only his rich historical knowledge but as well a keen edi- torial eye for typos and other such errors. The editor of the Oxford His- tory of the United States series, David Kennedy, offered very sensible advice, and I thank him for overseeing the whole project. The Oxford editor, Susan Ferber, has a good eye and ear for writing and made many valuable suggestions. My thanks also to the incomparable copy editor, India Cooper. Of course, in the end I am responsible for any errors that remain. viii acknowledgments Since this book sums up a great deal of what I have learned about the early Republic over my entire career, I am deeply indebted to the many people who have helped me in one way or another over the past half cen- tury. But I owe the greatest debt to my wife, Louise, who has been editor and soulmate through the whole period. Contents List of Maps, xi Editor’s Introduction, xiii Abbreviations Used in Citations, xvii Introduction: Rip Van Winkle’s America, 1 1. Experiment in Republicanism, 5 2. A Monarchical Republic, 53 3. The Federalist Program, 95 4. The Emergence of the Jeffersonian Republican Party, 140 5. The French Revolution in America, 174 6. John Adams and the Few and the Many, 209 7. The Crisis of 1798–1799, 239 8. The Jeffersonian Revolution of 1800, 276 9. Republican Society, 315 10. The Jeffersonian West, 357 11. Law and an Independent Judiciary, 400 12. Chief Justice John Marshall and the Origins of Judicial Review, 433 13. Republican Reforms, 469 14. Between Slavery and Freedom, 508 15. The Rising Glory of America, 543 16. Republican Religion, 576 x contents 17. Republican Diplomacy, 620 18. The War of 1812, 659 19. A World Within Themselves, 701 Bibliographical Essay, 739 Index, 753 Maps The Treaty of Greenville, 132 The United States, 1803–1807, 360 Average Time-Lag for Public Information from Philadelphia, 1790, 480 Average Time-Lag for Public Information from Philadelphia, 1817, 480 The Mediterranean and the Barbary Pirates, 638 The War of 1812—Major Campaigns, 678 The Treaty of Fort Jackson, 688 This page intentionally left blank Editor’s Introduction Gordon S. Wood’s Empire of Liberty takes its place in the Oxford History of the United States between two other notable volumes: Robert Mid- dlekauff’s The Glorious Cause, which masterfully covers the Revolution- ary War era that immediately preceded the period covered here, and Daniel Walker Howe’s What Hath God Wrought, which vividly evokes the cultural ferment and technological transformations that marked the years between the conclusion of the War of 1812 and the end of the Mexi- can War in 1848. The present volume addresses the astonishingly volatile, protean moment that lay between the achievement of national indepen- dence and the emergence of a swiftly maturing mass democracy and modern economy in the Jacksonian Era. The two and a half decades bracketed by the signing of the Constitu- tion in 1788 and the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815, which ended the War of 1812, constituted one of the most precarious and consequential passages in American history. As the period opened, some four million Americans, one-fi fth of them black slaves, dwelled between the Atlantic seaboard and the Appalachians, many of them itching to spill over the mountain crest into the untamed interior. They inhabited a new nation struggling to establish itself on a continent still coveted by hostile impe- rial powers, and still seething with Indians ever more determined to resist white encroachment. Their governments were founded on inspiring but untested political principles. They aspired to shape a society modeled on its European, especially English, antecedents, and yet unlike any seen before. Few seasons in American history have been pregnant with more momentous uncertainties. xiv editor’s introduction Usually referred to as the “early national period,” the era was clamor- ously contentious, urgently creative, and teeming with possibilities for failure. To the men and women who lived though that time, the fate of their fl edgling republic was by no means secure, and the character of their communities was disconcertingly labile. History offered little guid- ance as to what the future might hold for a polyglot, restless, self-govern- ing, and assertive people. They were rebellious by nature, rootless by circumstance, and ravenous to possess the vast territories that beckoned to their westward. History’s shores are littered with the wreckage of nascent nations that foundered before they could grow to stable maturity. Why should the fragile American ship of state, launched in 1776 and relaunched in 1788, be expected to enjoy a happier fate? In little more than a decade, the American people had thrown off the British yoke and jettisoned the Arti- cles of Confederation—a record of bellicose lawbreaking and political inconstancy that gave scant promise of their ability to sustain viable gov- ernments or even a coherent and orderly society. Yet somehow those mercurial and sometimes irascible Americans managed to lay the foundations of a resilient democratic political system that has endured for more than two centuries. The story of that remark- able and in many ways improbable accomplishment lies at the heart of this book. In a series of admirably lucid chapters, Gordon Wood explains the formative origins of the nation’s major governmental institutions and political practices. His account of the ways in which Congress evolved the protocols and procedures that would allow it to make law for a diverse and footloose people is particularly instructive. His analyses of the peculiar characteristics of American law, the role of the federal and state judiciaries, and the development of the signal doctrine of judicial review are exemplary, as is his deft discussion of the role of political par- ties—or “factions,” as contemporaries called them—in determining the young republic’s political destiny. So too is his analysis of the novel insti- tution of the presidency, a tale in which George Washington fi gures prominently. Washington, along with Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, is also a central character in Wood’s trenchant portrayal of the principles that guided America’s earli- est foreign policies, leaving precedents that would inform American diplomacy ever after. But Empire of Liberty’s deepest subject is not simply the formal politi- cal system that Americans crafted in their fi rst years of nationhood.
Recommended publications
  • Creating a French Enemy in the United States During the 1790S Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States during the 1790s Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis Hervé-Thomas Campangne Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/408 DOI: 10.4000/angles.408 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Hervé-Thomas Campangne, « Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States during the 1790s Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/408 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/angles.408 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States... 1 Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States during the 1790s Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis Hervé-Thomas Campangne 1 Countless U.S. presidents and leaders, including Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, have reminded Americans that France is their country’s “oldest ally” (Riché 2013; Seelow 2013; Obama 2015; Serhan 2017). Likewise, many a French official has underscored the unwavering and “natural” quality of the commitment between France and the United States (De Gaulle 1965; Mitterrand 1984; Macron 2018). Yet political scientists and historians often point to the cyclical nature of French-American relations (Duroselle 1978; Bozo and Parmentier 2007: 545).
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Era 1787-1800
    THE FEDERALIST ERA 1787-1800 Articles of Confederation: the first form of government. *NATIONAL GOVERNMENT TOO WEAK! Too much state power “friendship of states” examples of being too weak: • No President/No executive • Congress can’t tax or raise an army • States are coining their own money • Foreign troubles (British on the frontier, French in New Orleans) Shays’ Rebellion: Daniel Shays is a farmer in Massachusetts protesting tax collectors. The rebellion is a wake up call - recognize we need a new government Constitutional Convention of 1787: Delegates meet to revise the Articles, instead draft a new Constitution • Major issue discussed = REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS (more representatives in Congress, more influence you have in passing laws/policies in your favor) NJ Plan (equal per state) vs. Virginia Plan (based on population) House of Representatives: GREAT COMPROMISE Based on population Creates a bicameral Senate: (two-house) legislature Equal, two per state THREE-FIFTHS • 3 out of every 5 slaves will count for representation and taxation COMPROMISE • increases representation in Congress for South Other Compromises: • Congress regulates interstate and foreign trade COMMERCIAL • Can tax imports (tariffs) but not exports COMPROMISE • Slave trade continued until 1808 How did the Constitution fix the problems of the Articles of Confederation? ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION CONSTITUTION • States have the most power, national • states have some power, national government government has little has most • No President or executive to carry out
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University M crct. rrs it'terrjt onai A Be" 4 Howe1 ir”?r'"a! Cor"ear-, J00 Norte CeeD Road App Artjor mi 4 6 ‘Og ' 346 USA 3 13 761-4’00 600 sC -0600 Order Number 9238197 Selected literary letters of Sophia Peabody Hawthorne, 1842-1853 Hurst, Nancy Luanne Jenkins, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Civilian Involvement in the 1990-91 Gulf War Through the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Charles Imbriani Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE CIVILIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 1990-91 GULF WAR THROUGH THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET By CHARLES IMBRIANI A Dissertation submitted to the Interdisciplinary Program in the Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2012 Charles Imbriani defended this dissertation on October 4, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Peter Garretson Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dennis Moore Committee Member Irene Zanini-Cordi Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Fred (Freddie) Bissert 1935-2012. I first met Freddie over forty years ago when I stared working for Pan American World Airways in New York. It was twenty-two year later, still with Pan Am, when I took a position as ramp operations trainer; and Freddie was assigned to teach me the tools of the trade. In 1989 while in Berlin for training, Freddie and I witnessed the abandoning of the guard towers along the Berlin Wall by the East Germans. We didn’t realize it then, but we were witnessing the beginning of the end of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of American Political Institutions
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS Department of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University AS.190.632 Spring 2021 Tuesdays, 2:00 PM Adam Sheingate Daniel Schlozman [email protected] [email protected] Office hours by appointment Office hours by appointment This course explores institutional development in American national politics, from the Founding until the present. It traces parties, Congress, the presidency, bureaucracy, and courts, and also examines how those institutions have interacted with one another, and shaped and been shaped by the mass public, across American history. Throughout the course, we will consider how ideas, interests, procedures, and sequence together shape institutions as they collide and abrade over time. Finally, although it hardly covers the entire corpus across the subfield, the course is also designed to prepare students to sit for comprehensive examinations in American politics. While the authors come from a variety of theoretical vantage points, combining classic and newer readings, this course is, in a sense, a very traditional one. We examine the formal sites where power is exercised, and the political elites who exercise it. By the end of the semester, you should have a better sense of the virtues – and limits – of such an approach. For three classes, you will write short (up to 5 pages) papers, succinctly bringing together the reading for a particular week. Avoid summary. Instead, specify the core theoretical, methodological, or interpretive issues at stake, and make clear how the various authors have approached them. Papers should be circulated via e-mail to the entire class by 4PM on Monday.
    [Show full text]
  • Awakening an Empire of Liberty: Exploring the Roots of Socratic Inquiry and Political Nihilism in American Democracy
    Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 2 2005 Awakening an Empire of Liberty: Exploring the Roots of Socratic Inquiry and Political Nihilism in American Democracy Maurice R. Dyson Columbia Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Maurice R. Dyson, Awakening an Empire of Liberty: Exploring the Roots of Socratic Inquiry and Political Nihilism in American Democracy, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 575 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss2/4 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AWAKENING AN EMPIRE OF LIBERTY†: EXPLORING THE ROOTS OF SOCRATIC INQUIRY AND POLITICAL NIHILISM IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY MATTERS: WINNING THE FIGHT AGAINST IMPERIALISM. BY CORNEL WEST. PENGUIN PRESS (2004). Pp.229. * Reviewed by Maurice R. Dyson In his latest book, Democracy Matters, Cornel West contends that a perfect storm is in the making, one which has the greatest potential to destroy American democracy. This includes three combined anti- democratic dogmas that have collectively operated to deprive everyday Americans of the ability to critically analyze not only their own state of † The phrase “Empire of Liberty” was first used by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. The phrase has come to signify the contradiction of the United States as a beacon of egalitarian freedom and a bulwark of imperialism and racial subordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Minting America: Coinage and the Contestation of American Identity, 1775-1800
    ABSTRACT MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 by James Patrick Ambuske “Minting America” investigates the ideological and culture links between American identity and national coinage in the wake of the American Revolution. In the Confederation period and in the Early Republic, Americans contested the creation of a national mint to produce coins. The catastrophic failure of the paper money issued by the Continental Congress during the War for Independence inspired an ideological debate in which Americans considered the broader implications of a national coinage. More than a means to conduct commerce, many citizens of the new nation saw coins as tangible representations of sovereignty and as a mechanism to convey the principles of the Revolution to future generations. They contested the physical symbolism as well as the rhetorical iconology of these early national coins. Debating the stories that coinage told helped Americans in this period shape the contours of a national identity. MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by James Patrick Ambuske Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2006 Advisor______________________ Andrew Cayton Reader_______________________ Carla Pestana Reader_______________________ Daniel Cobb Table of Contents Introduction: Coining Stories………………………………………....1 Chapter 1: “Ever to turn brown paper
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionally Compromised Democracy: the United States District Clause, Its Historical Significance, and Modern Repercussions Bradley Raboin
    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 45 Article 3 Number 4 Summer 2018 1-1-2018 Constitutionally Compromised Democracy: The United States District Clause, Its Historical Significance, and Modern Repercussions Bradley Raboin Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Bradley Raboin, Constitutionally Compromised Democracy: The United States District Clause, Its Historical Significance, and Modern Repercussions, 45 Hastings Const. L.Q. 685 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol45/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Constitutionally Compromised Democracy: The United States District Clause, Its Historical Significance, and Modern Repercussions by BRADLEY RABOIN* Introduction On September 17, 1787, the United States Constitution was submitted for approval to the Congress of the Confederation and, subsequently, for ratification by the American States.1 This constitution was a political phenomenon: For the first time in history, an entire nation would be given the power-through popular ratification-to decide what form of government would rule over them. 2 At its core, the
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth Century Legal Treatises Torts Fiche Listing
    Nineteenth Century Legal Treatises Torts Fiche Listing Rives, George Lockhart, 1849-1917. Harris, George E. (George Emrick), 1827-1911. Torts under the code : an examination into the A treatise on the law of damages by corporations provisions of the proposed civil code relating to the including cases damnum absque injuria. law of torts with an enquiry into the effect of the code Rochester, N.Y. : Lawyers' Co-operative. 1892 upon litigation against the elevated railways. Damages New York : Evening Post Job Print. Office. 1885 2 v. (cxxx, 1350 p.) ; 23 cm.; US-24-2. Torts Fiche: 15072-15088 33 p. ; 23 cm.; US-22-121. Fiche: 787 McKinney, William Mark, 1865-1955. A treatise on the law of fellow-servants : Cooley, Thomas McIntyre, 1824-1898. embracing a collection of statutes, English and A treatise on the law of torts : or the wrongs American, changing or abrogating the common law which arise independent of contract. rule : together with an appendix relating to employes' Chicago : Callaghan. 1879 insurance societies. Torts Northport, N.Y. : E. Thompson. 1890 ci, 755 p. ; 24 cm.; US-22-1. Damages Fiche: 15003-15012 xxxiv, 515 p. : forms ; 24 cm.; US-24-3. Fiche: 15089-15094 Hale, William Benjamin, 1871-1924. Handbook on the law of torts. Cases on the law of damages. St. Paul, Minn. : West Pub. Co. 1896 St. Paul, Minn. : West Pub. Co. 1898 Torts Damages xi, 636 p. ; 23 cm.; US-22-2. viii, 487 p. ; 26 cm.; US-24-4; selected by Floyd R. Fiche: 15013-15020 Mechem. 2nd ed. Fiche: 15095-15100 Heard, Franklin Fiske, 1825-1889.
    [Show full text]
  • Albemarle County in Virginia
    ^^m ITD ^ ^/-^7^ Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.arGhive.org/details/albemarlecountyiOOwood ALBEMARLE COUNTY IN VIIIGIMIA Giving some account of wHat it -was by nature, of \srHat it was made by man, and of some of tbe men wHo made it. By Rev. Edgar Woods " It is a solemn and to\acKing reflection, perpetually recurring. oy tHe -weaKness and insignificance of man, tHat -wKile His generations pass a-way into oblivion, -with all tKeir toils and ambitions, nature Holds on Her unvarying course, and pours out Her streams and rene-ws Her forests -witH undecaying activity, regardless of tHe fate of Her proud and perisHable Sovereign.**—^e/frey. E.NEW YORK .Lie LIBRARY rs526390 Copyright 1901 by Edgar Woods. • -• THE MicHiE Company, Printers, Charlottesville, Va. 1901. PREFACE. An examination of the records of the county for some in- formation, awakened curiosity in regard to its early settle- ment, and gradually led to a more extensive search. The fruits of this labor, it was thought, might be worthy of notice, and productive of pleasure, on a wider scale. There is a strong desire in most men to know who were their forefathers, whence they came, where they lived, and how they were occupied during their earthly sojourn. This desire is natural, apart from the requirements of business, or the promptings of vanity. The same inquisitiveness is felt in regard to places. Who first entered the farms that checker the surrounding landscape, cut down the forests that once covered it, and built the habitations scattered over its bosom? With the young, who are absorbed in the engagements of the present and the hopes of the future, this feeling may not act with much energy ; but as they advance in life, their thoughts turn back with growing persistency to the past, and they begin to start questions which perhaps there is no means of answering.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara The United States and the Barbary Pirates: Adventures in Sexuality, State-Building, and Nationalism, 1784-1815 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Jason Raphael Zeledon Committee in charge: Professor Patricia Cohen, co-chair Professor John Majewski, co-chair Professor Salim Yaqub Professor Mhoze Chikowero June 2016 The dissertation of Jason Raphael Zeledon is approved ______________________________________________ Mhoze Chikowero ______________________________________________ Salim Yaqub ______________________________________________ Patricia Cohen, Committee Co-Chair ______________________________________________ John Majewski, Committee Co-Chair June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my eleventh-grade American History teacher, Peggy Ormsby. If I had not taken her AP class, my life probably would have gone in a different direction! At that time math was my favorite subject, but her class got me hooked on studying American History. Thanks, too, to the excellent teachers and mentors in graduate school who shaped and challenged my thinking. At American University (where I earned my M.A.), I’d like to thank Max Friedman, Andrew Lewis, Kate Haulman, and Eileen Findlay. I transferred to UCSB to finish my Ph.D. and have thoroughly enjoyed working with Pat Cohen, John Majewski, Salim Yaqub, and Mhoze Chikowero. I’d especially like to thank Pat, who provided insightful feedback on early drafts of my chapter about the Mellimelli mission (which has been published in Diplomatic History). Additionally, I’d like to thank UCSB’s History, Writing, and English Departments for providing Teaching Assistantships and the staffs of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, the Library of Congress Manuscript Reading Room, and the Huntington Library for their help and friendliness.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Hamilton Letter Production
    Alexander Hamilton Letter Production Is Tremaine imperatorial or driveable after demoralizing Derrek imprecated so deceivingly? Ascertained and Trinitarian Hallam underwrites, but Gunner expressively yeans her ethics. Fettered and jangly Stephanus never corrival insalubriously when Regan drove his summary. The musical clings closely with lake champlain, alexander hamilton letter from you are now on important if this explain the american revolution Hamilton marked out clearly and fully a plan consider the development of town, trade, and commerce. Hamilton found to obtain of less importance. That miranda had distinguished himself as a benevolent, as busy as mrs. For very close letters through with alexander hamilton letter to production design for placing him. Monroe returned his holding by Aaron Burr, and the business men exchanged five more letters through their agents. Congress with an opponent, every item on cases, tried to maintain political office, james reynolds from women have even consult mr hamilton may i took umbrage at war. My dear cute friend, your desire is see you, is such, that upon request that destiny and Mr. Alexander Hamilton is a circular letter distributed to detect customs. They decide whether it has no beauty during his letters? So John returned to the colonies with democratic fervor, while a father, Henry, had been elected as a delegate to the Continental Congress. Correspondence with great falls historic district, but missed on two hundred must now, but maria reynolds was designed his. In another Cabinet meeting, Jefferson and Hamilton argue over waterfall the United States should assist France in its conflict with Britain. Philip Schuyler, a wealthy and influential New Yorker.
    [Show full text]