DOCSLIB.ORG

Intel 2002 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intel 2002 Annual Report Does advanced 2002 Annual Report intel.com intc.com technology really matter? 36 1.6 100 33.7 1.51 Americas 52% 44% 32% 29.4 26.8 26.3 26.5 27 1.2 75 25.1 1.05 38% 0.97 20.8 0.86 19% 18 0.8 50 16.2 0.73 Asia- 16% Pacific 11.5 0.50 27% 0.46 Europe 24% 8.8 23% 9 0.4 25 0.33 0.33 0.19 Japan 10% 8% 7% 0 0 0 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 92 97 02 Net revenue Diluted earnings per share† Geographic breakdown Dollars in billions Dollars, adjusted for stock splits of revenue †Amortization of goodwill reduced earnings per share Percent in 2001 by $0.22 ($0.18 in 2000 and $0.05 in 1999). Goodwill is no longer amortized, beginning in 2002. ® New Intel technologies deliver wireless Our “Yes” consumer ad campaign highlights capability for people on the go. the benefits of Intel technology. 4.0 40 8.0 3.9 4.0 38.4 3.8 Machinery and equipment 7.3 35.5 35.6 Land, buildings and improvements 33.3 6.7 3.1 30.2 28.4 30 6.0 3.0 27.3 26.2 2.5 4.7 2.3 4.5 4.0 20 4.0 2.0 3.6 1.8 3.4 3.0 1.3 2.4 1.1 1.9 1.0 8.7 10 2.0 1.0 3.5 0 0 0 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Return on average Capital additions to property, Research and development† stockholders’ equity plant and equipment Dollars in billions Percent Dollars in billions †Excluding purchased in-process research and development Past performance does not guarantee future results. Cover: (Top) In 2002, we continued to invest in leading-edge manufacturing facilities, such as this cleanroom in New Mexico, where our new 300mm manufacturing process dramatically increases the number of chips per wafer. (Bottom) A wafer of Intel® Pentium® M processors, which are part of Intel® Centrino™ mobile technology. Letter from your management Yes, advanced technology matters more now than ever. In a slow economy, progress depends on the ability to work and communicate faster and more effectively. hen does technology matter? When mobile technology, are designed to pro Wa business traveler can connect wire- vide outstanding performance, extended lessly to her company’s network while battery life, new thin and light form fac waiting to board a plane. When a man- tors, and seamless wireless connectivity ager can electronically deliver training to We introduced the first products as employees at their desks. When a sales- part of Intel Centrino mobile technology man can access his contact database in March 2003. In February 2003, we and track sales on his cell phone. At Intel, Craig R. Barrett Paul S. Otellini announced our first “wireless-Internet-on we provide the building blocks, including wireless networking and a-chip”cellular processor, designed to facilitate smaller handheld next-generation computing and communications architectures, for PDAs and cell phones by combining baseband communications products that make people more productive virtually anytime, any- features with memory and applications processing functionality where. Our advanced manufacturing technologies let us deliver Desktop PCs: Our 2002 product advances helped us gain leading-edge performance products at lower costs, and help put significant market segment share in microprocessors for the PC us one generation ahead of the competition. It was a very strong year for the Intel® Pentium® 4 processor, with In 2002, difficult business conditions for Intel and other tech- almost 70% of all the Pentium 4 processors shipped in the fourth nology companies limited our opportunities for financial growth, quarter of 2002 running at 2 gigahertz or faster. In November 2002 and we ended the year with revenue of $26.8 billion, relatively flat we introduced the Pentium 4 Processor with HT Technology, which compared to 2001. Nevertheless, we feel renewed optimism: we increases performance in systems with supporting components shipped a record number of microprocessors in the fourth quarter by allowing a single processor to handle two streams of data of 2002, we are gaining ground in key product market segments, instructions simultaneously. The Pentium 4 processor is also the and we are investing for long-term success. In 2002, we spent $4.7 world’s first commercial desktop microprocessor to operate at 3 billion on new factories and other construction projects, and we gigahertz, or 3 billion cycles per second. This speed results in real invested $4.0 billion in research and development (R&D), primarily user benefits, improving the performance of the increasingly com focused on silicon products and processes. We ended 2002 with plex software that is so much a part of people’s daily work and play considerable accomplishments in key technology arenas: Servers: Servers are powerful systems—often with multiple Manufacturing: Our advanced manufacturing technology is microprocessors working together—that run enterprise applica the heart of our operations, enabling us to put increasing numbers tions, mine large amounts of data, and control central functions in of circuits on a single silicon chip and allowing for products that networks and on the Internet. 2002 was a great year for our server have higher performance as well as added features. In 2003, we are platform products. We introduced the Intel® Xeon™ processor beginning the ramp to our groundbreaking 90-nanometer silicon featuring HT Technology, enabling higher performance in two-way technology, which will bring new communications capabilities into servers and workstations, and the Intel Xeon processor MP, aimed our manufacturing process, enabling faster, more integrated and at servers based on four or more processors. Both processors are less costly communications chips. In 2002, we continued our man- based on the Intel® NetBurst™ microarchitecture. ufacturing conversion to 300mm (12-inch) wafers, from our older Also in 2002, we introduced our advanced Intel® Itanium® 2 200mm (8-inch) wafers, ultimately reducing our costs. The conver- microprocessor, designed for the most demanding applications that sion to 300mm wafers allows for more efficient use of our capital servers run and enabling our customers to offer competitive sys investment in equipment by providing more than twice as many tems at lower prices. In 2002, server manufacturers introduced a equivalent chips per wafer as 200mm wafers. variety of powerful systems incorporating as many as 32 Itanium 2 Wireless and mobile computing: Despite the overall technol- processors each. ogy slowdown, the wireless digital world is showing remarkable Strong foundation: We believe these accomplishments lay the progress. According to industry analyst Gartner, Inc., mobile PC foundation for the future of Intel’s advanced technology. Our charter sales are projected to grow at a compound annual rate of 13% from is to be one generation ahead of the competition in R&D, manufac 2002 through 2006, and the penetration of wireless LAN technol- turing technology and key products, thereby exceeding customer ogy into the professional mobile PC installed base is projected to expectations, capturing design wins and increasing profitability grow from 20% in late 2001 to more than 90% by the end of 2007. The business environment continues to be tough for technology We have exciting technologies in this area. In September 2002, but we feel that our successes in 2002 position us well for future we announced our upcoming mobile PC technology, which fea- growth. We are confident in our long-term plans to grow both tures a new processor specifically designed for the mobile market revenue and profitability through our leadership in technology segment. The forthcoming products, known as Intel® Centrino™ products, manufacturing and the power of the Intel® brand. Craig R. Barrett Paul S. Otellini Chief Executive Officer President and Chief Operating Officer Letter from your chairman “We take corporate governance seriously, expecting to achieve the same continuous improvement as in all of our business operations.” or corporate America, 2002 was the year of corporate that the board is organized to fulfill its responsibilities F governance, accounting-industry discipline and over- I preside at board meetings, make sure that the board haul, and housecleaning of Wall Street practices—in receives the right information, set board meeting agen Congress, in the courts and in the press. Corporate das and ensure that the directors have sufficient time scandals, bankruptcies and investigations culminated in for discussion. the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the most significant expansion As chairman, I am also responsible, in conjunction with of the federal securities and corporate law since World our lead independent director, for managing our board War II. We have followed all of this activity very closely, Andrew S. Grove and CEO evaluation processes. In an annual self-assess and we are actively participating in the national debate, making our ment process, I meet with each director individually, and we discuss views known to legislators, regulatory bodies and the general public . how each director performs his or her tasks, how they can improve, and Corporate governance is typically defined as the system that what we should do to help them and the board be more effective. Our allocates duties and authority among a company’s stockholders, CEO is subject to the same “360”evaluation by which all Intel employ board of directors and management. The stockholders elect the ees are evaluated: the independent directors and employees who board and vote on extraordinary matters; the board is the company’s work for and with the CEO all provide feedback on his performance governing body, responsible for hiring, overseeing and evaluating I feel very comfortable that the board personifies our key Intel management, particularly the chief executive officer (CEO); and values.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • When Is a Microprocessor Not a Microprocessor? the Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I
    Ross Bassett When is a Microprocessor not a Microprocessor? The Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I In the early 1990s an integrated circuit first made in 1969 and thus ante­ dating by two years the chip typically seen as the first microprocessor (Intel's 4004), became a microprocessor for the first time. The stimulus for this piece ofindustrial alchemy was a patent fight. A microprocessor patent had been issued to Texas Instruments, and companies faced with patent infringement lawsuits were looking for prior art with which to challenge it. 2 This old integrated circuit, but new microprocessor, was the ALl, designed by Lee Boysel and used in computers built by his start-up, Four-Phase Systems, established in 1968. In its 1990s reincarnation a demonstration system was built showing that the ALI could have oper­ ated according to the classic microprocessor model, with ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), and I/O (Input/ Output) forming a basic computer. The operative words here are could have, for it was never used in that configuration during its normal life­ time. Instead it was used as one-third of a 24-bit CPU (Central Processing Unit) for a series ofcomputers built by Four-Phase.3 Examining the ALl through the lenses of the history of technology and business history puts Intel's microprocessor work into a different per­ spective. The differences between Four-Phase's and Intel's work were industrially constructed; they owed much to the different industries each saw itselfin.4 While putting a substantial part ofa central processing unit on a chip was not a discrete invention for Four-Phase or the computer industry, it was in the semiconductor industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline ECE473 Computer Architecture and Organization • Technology Trends • Introduction to Computer Technology Trends Architecture
    Outline ECE473 Computer Architecture and Organization • Technology Trends • Introduction to Computer Technology Trends Architecture Lecturer: Prof. Yifeng Zhu Fall, 2009 Portions of these slides are derived from: ECE473 Lec 1.1 ECE473 Lec 1.2 Dave Patterson © UCB Birth of the Revolution -- What If Your Salary? The Intel 4004 • Parameters – $16 base First Microprocessor in 1971 – 59% growth/year – 40 years • Intel 4004 • 2300 transistors • Initially $16 Æ buy book • Barely a processor • 3rd year’s $64 Æ buy computer game • Could access 300 bytes • 16th year’s $27 ,000 Æ buy cacar of memory • 22nd year’s $430,000 Æ buy house th @intel • 40 year’s > billion dollars Æ buy a lot Introduced November 15, 1971 You have to find fundamental new ways to spend money! 108 KHz, 50 KIPs, 2300 10μ transistors ECE473 Lec 1.3 ECE473 Lec 1.4 2002 - Intel Itanium 2 Processor for Servers 2002 – Pentium® 4 Processor • 64-bit processors Branch Unit Floating Point Unit • .18μm bulk, 6 layer Al process IA32 Pipeline Control November 14, 2002 L1I • 8 stage, fully stalled in- cache ALAT Integer Multi- Int order pipeline L1D Medi Datapath RF @3.06 GHz, 533 MT/s bus cache a • Symmetric six integer- CLK unit issue design HPW DTLB 1099 SPECint_base2000* • IA32 execution engine 1077 SPECfp_base2000* integrated 21.6 mm L2D Array and Control L3 Tag • 3 levels of cache on-die totaling 3.3MB 55 Million 130 nm process • 221 Million transistors Bus Logic • 130W @1GHz, 1.5V • 421 mm2 die @intel • 142 mm2 CPU core L3 Cache ECE473 Lec 1.5 ECE473 19.5mm Lec 1.6 Source: http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/ @intel 2006 - Intel Core Duo Processors for Desktop 2008 - Intel Core i7 64-bit x86-64 PERFORMANCE • Successor to the Intel Core 2 family 40% • Max CPU clock: 2.66 GHz to 3.33 GHz • Cores :4(: 4 (physical)8(), 8 (logical) • 45 nm CMOS process • Adding GPU into the processor POWER 40% …relative to Intel® Pentium® D 960 When compared to the Intel® Pentium® D processor 960.
    [Show full text]
  • Embedded Linux Systems with the Yocto Project™
    OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SERIES Embedded Linux Systems with the Yocto Project" FREE SAMPLE CHAPTER SHARE WITH OTHERS �f, � � � � Embedded Linux Systems with the Yocto ProjectTM This page intentionally left blank Embedded Linux Systems with the Yocto ProjectTM Rudolf J. Streif Boston • Columbus • Indianapolis • New York • San Francisco • Amsterdam • Cape Town Dubai • London • Madrid • Milan • Munich • Paris • Montreal • Toronto • Delhi • Mexico City São Paulo • Sidney • Hong Kong • Seoul • Singapore • Taipei • Tokyo Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. The author and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. For information about buying this title in bulk quantities, or for special sales opportunities (which may include electronic versions; custom cover designs; and content particular to your business, training goals, marketing focus, or branding interests), please contact our corporate sales depart- ment at [email protected] or (800) 382-3419. For government sales inquiries, please contact [email protected]. For questions about sales outside the U.S., please contact [email protected]. Visit us on the Web: informit.com Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file with the Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Definition of Computers Technically, a Computer Is a Programmable Machine
    1. Definition of computers Technically, a computer is a programmable machine. This means it can execute a programmed list of instructions and respond to new instructions that it is given. 2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using computer? Advantages are : communication is improved, pay bill's online, people have access to things they would not have had before (for instance old people who cannot leave the house they can buy groceries online) Computers make life easier. The disadvantages are: scams, fraud, people not going out as much, we do not yet know the effects of computers and pregnancy or the emissions that computers make,. bad posture from sitting too long at a desk, repetitive strain injuries and the fact that most organizations expect everyone to own a computer. Year 1901 The first radio message is sent across the Atlantic Ocean in Morse code. 1902 3M is founded. 1906 The IEC is founded in London England. 1906 Grace Hopper is born December 9, 1906. 1911 Company now known as IBM on is incorporated June 15, 1911 in the state of New York as the Computing - Tabulating - Recording Company (C-T-R), a consolidation of the Computing Scale Company, and The International Time Recording Company. 1912 Alan Turing is born June 23, 1912. 1912 G. N. Lewis begins work on the lithium battery. 1915 The first telephone call is made across the continent. 1919 Olympus is established on October 12, 1919 by Takeshi Yamashita. 1920 First radio broadcasting begins in United States, Pittsburgh, PA. 1921 Czech playwright Karel Capek coins the term "robot" in the 1921 play RUR (Rossum's Universal Robots).
    [Show full text]
  • Class-Action Lawsuit
    Case 3:20-cv-00863-SI Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 279 Steve D. Larson, OSB No. 863540 Email: [email protected] Jennifer S. Wagner, OSB No. 024470 Email: [email protected] STOLL STOLL BERNE LOKTING & SHLACHTER P.C. 209 SW Oak Street, Suite 500 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 227-1600 Attorneys for Plaintiffs [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page.] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BLUE PEAK HOSTING, LLC, PAMELA Case No. GREEN, TITI RICAFORT, MARGARITE SIMPSON, and MICHAEL NELSON, on behalf of CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION themselves and all others similarly situated, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL v. INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION COMPLAINT Case 3:20-cv-00863-SI Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 279 Plaintiffs Blue Peak Hosting, LLC, Pamela Green, Titi Ricafort, Margarite Sampson, and Michael Nelson, individually and on behalf of the members of the Class defined below, allege the following against Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel” or “the Company”), based upon personal knowledge with respect to themselves and on information and belief derived from, among other things, the investigation of counsel and review of public documents as to all other matters. INTRODUCTION 1. Despite Intel’s intentional concealment of specific design choices that it long knew rendered its central processing units (“CPUs” or “processors”) unsecure, it was only in January 2018 that it was first revealed to the public that Intel’s CPUs have significant security vulnerabilities that gave unauthorized program instructions access to protected data. 2. A CPU is the “brain” in every computer and mobile device and processes all of the essential applications, including the handling of confidential information such as passwords and encryption keys.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT & ANALYSIS by J. TYLER RENZI A
    Sustainable Investment and Analysis Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Renzi, J. Tyler Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 04:29:36 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/146637 Renzi, 1 SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT & ANALYSIS By J. TYLER RENZI ________________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors degree With Honors in Finance The University of Arizona May 2010 Approved by: ______________________________ Dr. Sharon Garrison Department of Finance Renzi, 2 The University of Arizona Electric Theses and Dissertations Reproduction and Distribution Form Name: Renzi, John Tyler Degree Title: Bachelor’s in Business Administration Honors Area: Finance Date thesis submitted to Honors College: 05/05/2010 Title of Honors thesis: Sustainable Investment and Analysis The University of Arizona Library Release I hereby grant to the University of Arizona Library the nonexclusive worldwide right to reproduce and distribute my dissertation or thesis and abstract (herein, the “licensed materials”), in whole or in part, in any and all media of distribution and in any format in existence now or developed in the future. I represent and warrant to the University of Arizona that the licensed materials are my original work, that I am the sole owner of all rights in and to the licensed materials, and that none of the licensed materials infringe or violate the rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Intel Presentation Template Overview
    Intel 2016 Corporate Overview Updated September 2016 Intel is evolving. To a company that powers the data center and billions of smart, connected devices Intel’s Vision: If it’s smart and connected, it’s best with Intel. 2 Intel’s foundation: MOORE’S LAW History of Intel • 1968: Intel is founded by Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore • 1971: World’s first microprocessor • Now: Innovation that expands the reach and promise of computing 4 Executing to Moore’s Law Enabling new devices with higher functionality and complexity while controlling power, cost, and size Strained Silicon Hi-K Metal Gate 3D Transistors 90 nm 65 nm 45 nm 32 nm 22 nm 14 nm 10 nm 7 nm 5 Intel’s IDM Advantage Process Technology Intel Architecture Product Design Co-Optimized Process & Product Common Co-Optimized Architecture & Software Common Best Performance, Power, Security TOOLS Rapid Product Ramp GOALS Software Manufacturing Packaging 6 Intel is evolving Virtuous Cycle of Growth: our technology drives experiences 8 Intel delivers end to end solutions New Memory Client IOT Data Center Security Programmable Technologies Solutions Solutions 9 intel software: extensive Value Things Network Cloud/Data Center Wind River® Intel® Developer Zone Platform Security Simics Intel® Context Sensing Intel® CoFluent™ Technology Enabling Ecosystem Ecosystem Brillo OS …among others… Enabling 10 Intel is changing the world Corporate Responsibility at Intel Environmental Sustainability Supply Chain Responsibility Diversity & Inclusion Social Impact www.intel.com/responsibility www.intel.com/diversity 12 Barron’s. World’s Most Respected Companies Corporate Knights. Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations Corporate Responsibility Magazine. 100 Best Corporate Citizens (17th year) Diversity MBA magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ece585 Lec2.Pdf
    ECE 485/585 Microprocessor System Design Lecture 2: Memory Addressing 8086 Basics and Bus Timing Asynchronous I/O Signaling Zeshan Chishti Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science Source: Lecture based on materials provided by Mark F. Basic I/O – Part I ECE 485/585 Outline for next few lectures Simple model of computation Memory Addressing (Alignment, Byte Order) 8088/8086 Bus Asynchronous I/O Signaling Review of Basic I/O How is I/O performed Dedicated/Isolated /Direct I/O Ports Memory Mapped I/O How do we tell when I/O device is ready or command complete? Polling Interrupts How do we transfer data? Programmed I/O DMA ECE 485/585 Simplified Model of a Computer Control Control Data, Address, Memory Data Path Microprocessor Keyboard Mouse [Fetch] Video display [Decode] Printer [Execute] I/O Device Hard disk drive Audio card Ethernet WiFi CD R/W DVD ECE 485/585 Memory Addressing Size of operands Bytes, words, long/double words, quadwords 16-bit half word (Intel: word) 32-bit word (Intel: doubleword, dword) 0x107 64-bit double word (Intel: quadword, qword) 0x106 Note: names are non-standard 0x105 SUN Sparc word is 32-bits, double is 64-bits 0x104 0x103 Alignment 0x102 Can multi-byte operands begin at any byte address? 0x101 Yes: non-aligned 0x100 No: aligned. Low order address bit(s) will be zero ECE 485/585 Memory Operand Alignment …Intel IA speak (i.e. word = 16-bits = 2 bytes) 0x107 0x106 0x105 0x104 0x103 0x102 0x101 0x100 Aligned Unaligned Aligned Unaligned Aligned Unaligned word word Double Double Quad Quad address address word word word word -----0 address address address address -----00 ----000 ECE 485/585 Memory Operand Alignment Why do we care? Unaligned memory references Can cause multiple memory bus cycles for a single operand May also span cache lines Requiring multiple evictions, multiple cache line fills Complicates memory system and cache controller design Some architectures restrict addresses to be aligned Even in architectures without alignment restrictions (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Microprocessors in the 1970'S
    Part II 1970's -- The Altair/Apple Era. 3/1 3/2 Part II 1970’s -- The Altair/Apple era Figure 3.1: A graphical history of personal computers in the 1970’s, the MITS Altair and Apple Computer era. Microprocessors in the 1970’s 3/3 Figure 3.2: Andrew S. Grove, Robert N. Noyce and Gordon E. Moore. Figure 3.3: Marcian E. “Ted” Hoff. Photographs are courtesy of Intel Corporation. 3/4 Part II 1970’s -- The Altair/Apple era Figure 3.4: The Intel MCS-4 (Micro Computer System 4) basic system. Figure 3.5: A photomicrograph of the Intel 4004 microprocessor. Photographs are courtesy of Intel Corporation. Chapter 3 Microprocessors in the 1970's The creation of the transistor in 1947 and the development of the integrated circuit in 1958/59, is the technology that formed the basis for the microprocessor. Initially the technology only enabled a restricted number of components on a single chip. However this changed significantly in the following years. The technology evolved from Small Scale Integration (SSI) in the early 1960's to Medium Scale Integration (MSI) with a few hundred components in the mid 1960's. By the late 1960's LSI (Large Scale Integration) chips with thousands of components had occurred. This rapid increase in the number of components in an integrated circuit led to what became known as Moore’s Law. The concept of this law was described by Gordon Moore in an article entitled “Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits” in the April 1965 issue of Electronics magazine [338].
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying Internet of Things Security Successful Iot Device/Edge and Platform Security Deployment — Sunil Cheruvu Anil Kumar Ned Smith David M
    Demystifying Internet of Things Security Successful IoT Device/Edge and Platform Security Deployment — Sunil Cheruvu Anil Kumar Ned Smith David M. Wheeler Demystifying Internet of Things Security Successful IoT Device/Edge and Platform Security Deployment Sunil Cheruvu Anil Kumar Ned Smith David M. Wheeler Demystifying Internet of Things Security: Successful IoT Device/Edge and Platform Security Deployment Sunil Cheruvu Anil Kumar Chandler, AZ, USA Chandler, AZ, USA Ned Smith David M. Wheeler Beaverton, OR, USA Gilbert, AZ, USA ISBN-13 (pbk): 978-1-4842-2895-1 ISBN-13 (electronic): 978-1-4842-2896-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2896-8 Copyright © 2020 by The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Avaya Aura® Communication Manager Hardware Description and Reference
    Avaya Aura® Communication Manager Hardware Description and Reference Release 7.0.1 555-245-207 Issue 2 May 2016 © 2015-2016, Avaya, Inc. Link disclaimer All Rights Reserved. Avaya is not responsible for the contents or reliability of any linked Notice websites referenced within this site or Documentation provided by Avaya. Avaya is not responsible for the accuracy of any information, While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the statement or content provided on these sites and does not information in this document is complete and accurate at the time of necessarily endorse the products, services, or information described printing, Avaya assumes no liability for any errors. Avaya reserves or offered within them. Avaya does not guarantee that these links will the right to make changes and corrections to the information in this work all the time and has no control over the availability of the linked document without the obligation to notify any person or organization pages. of such changes. Licenses Warranty THE SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AVAILABLE ON THE AVAYA Avaya provides a limited warranty on Avaya hardware and software. WEBSITE, HTTPS://SUPPORT.AVAYA.COM/LICENSEINFO, Refer to your sales agreement to establish the terms of the limited UNDER THE LINK “AVAYA SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS (Avaya warranty. In addition, Avaya’s standard warranty language, as well as Products)” OR SUCH SUCCESSOR SITE AS DESIGNATED BY information regarding support for this product while under warranty is AVAYA, ARE APPLICABLE TO ANYONE WHO DOWNLOADS, available to Avaya customers and other parties through the Avaya USES AND/OR INSTALLS AVAYA SOFTWARE, PURCHASED Support website: https://support.avaya.com/helpcenter/ FROM AVAYA INC., ANY AVAYA AFFILIATE, OR AN AVAYA getGenericDetails?detailId=C20091120112456651010 under the link CHANNEL PARTNER (AS APPLICABLE) UNDER A COMMERCIAL “Warranty & Product Lifecycle” or such successor site as designated AGREEMENT WITH AVAYA OR AN AVAYA CHANNEL PARTNER.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Engineering X86 Processor Microcode
    Reverse Engineering x86 Processor Microcode Philipp Koppe, Benjamin Kollenda, Marc Fyrbiak, Christian Kison, Robert Gawlik, Christof Paar, and Thorsten Holz, Ruhr-University Bochum https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity17/technical-sessions/presentation/koppe This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium August 16–18, 2017 • Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-931971-40-9 Open access to the Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX Reverse Engineering x86 Processor Microcode Philipp Koppe, Benjamin Kollenda, Marc Fyrbiak, Christian Kison, Robert Gawlik, Christof Paar, and Thorsten Holz Ruhr-Universitat¨ Bochum Abstract hardware modifications [48]. Dedicated hardware units to counter bugs are imperfect [36, 49] and involve non- Microcode is an abstraction layer on top of the phys- negligible hardware costs [8]. The infamous Pentium fdiv ical components of a CPU and present in most general- bug [62] illustrated a clear economic need for field up- purpose CPUs today. In addition to facilitate complex and dates after deployment in order to turn off defective parts vast instruction sets, it also provides an update mechanism and patch erroneous behavior. Note that the implementa- that allows CPUs to be patched in-place without requiring tion of a modern processor involves millions of lines of any special hardware. While it is well-known that CPUs HDL code [55] and verification of functional correctness are regularly updated with this mechanism, very little is for such processors is still an unsolved problem [4, 29]. known about its inner workings given that microcode and the update mechanism are proprietary and have not been Since the 1970s, x86 processor manufacturers have throughly analyzed yet.
    [Show full text]