Liver Function in Septic Shock

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.35.11.1249 on 1 November 1982. Downloaded from J Clin Pathol 1982;35:1249-1252 Liver function in septic shock JG BANKS,§ AK FOULIS,* IMcA LEDINGHAM, RNM MACSWEEN* From the University Departments ofSurgery and *Pathology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow GIl 6NT SUMMARY Serum liver function tests were estimated in 57 patients admitted to an Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) with a diagnosis of septic shock. Following an initial biochemical disturbance, persisting hyperbilirubinaemia was associated with a poor prognosis. Post-mortem liver histology in 22 patients showed varying degrees of non-specific reactive change, venous congestion, ischaemic necrosis, fatty change and intrahepatic cholestasis in 16 cases. In the remaining six cases there was moderately severe cholestasis with inspissated bile in the cholangioles. The possible aetiology of the observed cholestasis is discussed. Although multiple organ failure is a frequent cause of The duration of the shock episode was defined as death in patients requiring management in intensive the time in hours during which the systolic blood therapy units (ITU) overt hepatic failure is rare and pressure (SBP) remained at or below 100 mm of therapeutic support is usually focused on other mercury, excluding isolated readings above this level; organs, lungs, kidneys and heart in particular. this could be accurately assessed in 40 of the patients. However, Ledingham and McArdle recorded a 23% The primary source of sepsis in the patients was as incidence of jaundice in a consecutive series of follows: upper gastrointestinal tract (19), small copyright. 113 patients with septic shock. ' In the present intestine (7), large bowel (13), appendix (7), female retrospective study we have further investigated the genital (4), soft tissue (4), and others (3). Perforation incidence of hepatic dysfunction in some of these of viscera and postoperative anastomotic dehiscence patients, and have attempted to show relationships were the most frequent factors precipitating the between the hepatic dysfunction and the duration of septic shock episode. shock and the subsequent clinical course in these Serial estimations of serum bilirubin (,umol/l), patients. In addition, in a number of necropsies, we alkaline phosphatase (King Armstrong Units have noted a distinctive pattern of intrahepatic (KAU)/100 ml), glutamic oxalacetic transaminase cholestasis and attention is drawn to this (GOT) and glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) http://jcp.bmj.com/ morphological feature. (IU/l), total protein (g/l), and albumin (g/l), were carried out using standard laboratory techniques. Patients and methods The Limulus lysate test2 to detect endotoxaemia was carried out in 31 patients. The test was regarded In the period 1975-1978, 66 patients with a diagnosis as positive if obvious gel formation occurred after of septic shock, as defined by Ledingham and incubation of the patient's serum with the lysate for 4 McArdle, I were admitted to the ITU at the Western h at 37°C. Blood cultures were performed each time a Infirmary, Glasgow. Of these, nine were found to sample was taken for the endotoxin assay. Additional on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected have pre-existing hepatobiliary or pancreatic disease blood cultures were performed where clinically or to have "preshock" disturbances of routine liver indicated. function tests (LFTs), and they were excluded from A post-mortem examination was performed in 22 this study. Of the 57 patients studied, 27 survived, of the 30 patients who died and sections of liver tissue comprising 16 men and 11 women with a mean age of were examined using routine staining methods. 48 ± 20 (SD) yr, and a mean stay in the ITU of 22 + 18 days; the 30 in the non-survivor group Results comprised 18 men and 12 women, mean age 59 + 10 yr, and a mean stay in the ITU of 14 + 12 days. The mean duration of shock for survivors was 13 + 8 h and for non-survivors 23 ± 16 h. Positive blood cultures were obtained in 26 (46%) patients with Accepted for publication 5 May 1982 Gram-negative isolated in 17 § Present address: Hope Hospital, Eccles Old Road, Salford M6 organisms being of 8HD. these; Escherichia coli (in 8 patients) was the most 1249 J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.35.11.1249 on 1 November 1982. Downloaded from 1250 Banks, Foulis, Ledingham, Macsween commonly cultured organism. The Limulus lysate Table 1 Liverfunction tests within 48 hours ofseptic shock test was positive in all of the 31 patients in whom this episode assay was performed. Survivors Non-survivors Clinical jaundice was present in 36 (63%) patients, (n = 27) (n = 30) 24 of the non-survivors as compared with 12 of the Mean + SEMMean t SEM survivors, a statistically significant difference (p < Bilirubin (pmol/l) 44 t 9 81 t 21 0-001 - X 2 test). The results of the LFTs carried out AlkalinePhosphatase(KAU/100ml) 11 + 1 14 + 2 SGOT (IU/1) 110 ± 30 105 ± 26 within 48 h of the onset of the shock episode are SGPT (IU/1) 46 ± 10 74 ± 21 summarised in Table I. In 85% of the patients at least Albumin (g/l) 31 + 1 28 t 1 one of the indices measured was found to be Total protein (g/l) 58 ± 2 55 ± 1 abnormal. There were no statistical differences n = number of patients. (Student's t test) between survivors and non-survivors for any of the LFT indices. When mean values for LFT indices were compared 2, 5 and 10 days after the Table 2 Liverfunction tests (mean SEM) in 40 patients onset of shock, there was a significantly higher mean within 48 h ofthe onsetofseptic shock related to the duration bilirubin level (p < 0 05, Student's t test) on day 10 in ofthe shock episode the 16 non-survivors (110 + 28 ,mol/l) as compared with 12 survivors (30 ± 8 j±mol/1); the other indices Duration ofshock episode (h) two were not significantly different between these 6 6-12 13-24 >24 groups. (n 9) (n =8) (n = 16) (n = 7) in to the duration of Analysis of the LFTs relation Bilirubin (>±mol/1) 44 + 12 36 + 9 70 ± 17 151 + 71 the shock episode is shown in Table 2. While this Alkaline Phosphatase shows a trend towards more deranged LFTs the more (KAU/100 ml) 13 2 12+ 1 10 1 13 ± 4 SGOT (IU/I) 53 16 88 20 114 36 176 ± 86 prolonged the shock episode the results do not attain SGPT (IU/l) 29 12 52 12 42 9 142 ± 65 statistical significance. n = number of patients. copyright. POST-MORTEM EXAMINATION OF LIVER Macroscopically the livers showed no unusual features and in none of the 22 cases examined was Discussion there any evident large duct obstruction. Microscopically the livers in 16 cases showed a Cardiogenic shock, bacterial sepsis, septic/endotoxin number of changes comprising varying degrees of shock and toxic shock are recognised causes of liver non-specific reactive changes with focal liver cell injury. In acute cardiogenic or hypovolaemic shock necrosis, Kupffer cell hyperplasia and portal tract with inadequate hepatic perfusion, ischaemic liver inflammation, venous congestion, ischaemic cell necrosis may be extensive resulting in jaundice http://jcp.bmj.com/ necrosis, fatty change and intrahepatic cholestasis. with biochemical features resembling those seen in In six cases, however, the livers showed an unusual acute hepatitis.-5 Jaundice associated with lobar pattern of cholestasis. In these there was moderately pneumonia was first reported in 1836,6 and a review severe cholestasis, predominantly perivenular but in of the syndrome as it occurred in Western countries some extending to the periportal zone; intracellular was published by Zimmerman and Thomas in 1951;7 bile retention and canalicular concretions were in recent years the syndrome has been reported was a present and there related reactive inflammatory mainly from African countries.8 The term cholangitis on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected process with Kupffer cell hyperplasia and aggregates lenta was applied in 1939 to a syndrome in which of ceroid-laden macrophages. In addition, however, jaundice occurred in association with streptococcal at the portal/parenchymal interface the cholangioles infection.9 Infection by Gram-negative bacteria in (canals of Hering) were prominently dilated, their particular has, however, been most commonly epithelium swollen, and many of them contained associated with clinical jaundice, although a variety inspissated strongly PAS-positive bile concretions of organisms have been incriminated. This is a well (Figure). Neutrophil polymorphs were conspicuous known and important cause of jaundice in the within the dilated cholangioles and also surrounding neonatal period and in infants,'10 but which may also them and extending into the periportal parenchyma. affect adults.' '" These topics have been well The portal tracts showed some mild oedema, with a reviewed by Zimmerman and his colleagues.'5 In the light mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. The bile ducts newly recognised toxic shock syndrome, associated appeared unremarkable. No bile concretions were with an exotoxin produced by Staphylococcus aureus, noted within them and there was no evident acute jaundice is a frequent feature 16 and in one series of 22 cholangitis. patients cholestasis was a feature in all.' J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.35.11.1249 on 1 November 1982. Downloaded from Liver function in septic shock 1251 Post-mortem liverfroma patient dying with septic shock Post-mortem liver from a patient dying with septic shock other drugs. Most patients received intravenous following an antrectomy for a gastric carcinoma. There is a hyperalimentation, some had received blood mild chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate in the portal tract, transfusions and some had haematomas with but note that the bile duct appears normal and there is no extravascular haemolysis.
Recommended publications
  • Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide

    Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide

    Stanford Health Issue Date: 05/2017 Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide Table 1: Antibiotic selection options for healthcare associated and/or immunocompromised patients • Healthcare associated: intravenous therapy, wound care, or intravenous chemotherapy within the prior 30 days, residence in a nursing home or other long-term care facility, hospitalization in an acute care hospital for two or more days within the prior 90 days, attendance at a hospital or hemodialysis clinic within the prior 30 days • Immunocompromised: Receiving chemotherapy, known systemic cancer not in remission, ANC <500, severe cell-mediated immune deficiency Table 2: Antibiotic selection options for community acquired, immunocompetent patients Table 3: Antibiotic selection options for patients with simple sepsis, community acquired, immunocompetent patients requiring hospitalization. Risk Factors for Select Organisms P. aeruginosa MRSA Invasive Candidiasis VRE (and other resistant GNR) Community acquired: • Known colonization with MDROs • Central venous catheter • Liver transplant • Prior IV antibiotics within 90 day • Recent MRSA infection • Broad-spectrum antibiotics • Known colonization • Known colonization with MDROs • Known MRSA colonization • + 1 of the following risk factors: • Prolonged broad antibacterial • Skin & Skin Structure and/or IV access site: ♦ Parenteral nutrition therapy Hospital acquired: ♦ Purulence ♦ Dialysis • Prolonged profound • Prior IV antibiotics within 90 days ♦ Abscess
  • Septic Shock V9.0 Patient Flow Map

    Septic Shock V9.0 Patient Flow Map

    Septic Shock v9.0 Patient Flow Map Approval & Citation Summary of Version Changes Explanation of Evidence Ratings Patient presents to the ED with fever and/or concern for infection and ED sepsis score ≥ 6 ! BPA fires Use the ED Suspected Septic Shock RN and Well-appearing patients should be placed pathway for all ill on the appropriate ED CSW pathway for Provider appearing patients their underlying condition (e.g. ED No including HemOnc/BMT, Huddle: HemOnc BMT Suspected Infection, ED Central Line Infection Is the patient ill Suspected Central Line Infection, ED and Neonates appearing? Neonatal Fever) Yes ED Septic Shock Pathway • Use ED Suspected Septic Shock Plan • Antibiotics and blood cultures for specific populations included Inpatient Admit Criteria Does NOT meet Inpatient Admit Minute criteria • Resolution of hypotension and no • Admit to ICU ongoing signs of sepsis after ≤ 40 ml / 60 Huddle: YES NO • Follow ICU Septic Shock Pathway kg NS bolus Does patient meet • Use PICU/CICU Septic Shock Admit • First dose antibiotics administered Inpatient admit Plan • RISK to follow criteria? • Antibiotics, blood cultures for specific populations included in sub plans Previously healthy > 30 days RISK RN to follow all • Admit to General Medicine patients admitted with • Follow Admit from ED Septic Shock concern for sepsis Pathway • Use Inpatient Septic Shock Plan ! Concern for evolving sepsis Previously healthy < 30 days Any • Admit to General Medicine admitted • Call RRT or Code Blue • Follow Neonatal Fever Pathway patient with • Follow Inpatient
  • Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers

    Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers

    World J. Surg. 7, 143-148, 1983 Wor Journal of Stirgery Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers S. Olerud, M.D., and M. Allg6wer, M.D. The Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden, and the Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland A questionnaire was sent to the following 6 trauma centers: Paris: Two or more peripheral, visceral, or com- University Hospital for Accident Surgery, Hannover, Fed- plex injuries with respiratory and circulatory fail- eral Republic of Germany (Prof. H. Tscherne); University ure. (This excludes patients who only have sus- of Munich, Department of Surgery, Klinikum Grossha- tained fractures.) dern, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany (Prof. G. Dallas: Multiply injured patient presenting le- Heberer); Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden (Prof. sions to 2 cavities, associated with 2 or more long S. Olerud); University Hospital, Department of Surgery, bone failures; lesions to 1 cavity associated with 2 Basel, Switzerland (Prof. M. Allgiiwer); H6pital de la Piti~, or more long bone failures; or lesions to multiple Paris, France (Prof. R. Roy-Camille); and University of extremities (at minimum, 3 long bone failures). Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. (Prof. B. Claudi). Their answers have been summarized in a few short paragraphs where tabulation was not possible, Do You Grade Polytrauma, and If So, How? and then mainly in tabular form for convenient comparison among the various centers. There seems to be considerable international agreement on the main points of early aggres- Hannover: Yes, with our own grading system along sive cardiopulmonary management to prevent multiple with ISS and AIS.
  • Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring

    Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring

    Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring Matthew Bank, MD, FACS Assistant Professor Hofstra North Shore‐LIJ School of Medicine Director, Surgical Intensive Care Unit North Shore University Hospital I do not have any financial conflicts of interest to disclose for this presentation Shock • Multiple different strategies for classifying shock, but all forms of shock result in impaired oxygen delivery secondary to either one or both: – reduced cardiac output (cardiogenic, septic) OR – loss of effective intravascular volume (hypovolemic, neurogenic, anaphylactic, septic). Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Gram negative septic shock: —Very studied well studied in animal models —Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in bacterial cell wall binds to LPS binding protein. —LPS‐LBP complex then binds to cell surface CD14 receptors on monocytes and macrophages. —The LPS‐LBP‐CD14 complex then activates cells via Toll‐like receptor‐4 (TLR4). —TLR4 then “activates” cells which produce a cytokine “cascade” of proinflamatory mediators. Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) – First cytokine produced in response to gram negative sepsis – Principal mediator for acute response to gram negative bacteria – Major source of TNF is from activated macrophages – High levels of TNF predict mortality and can cause apoptosis. Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) – Levels of IL‐1 increase soon after TNF production in gram negative sepsis (second cytokine to be elevated) – IL‐1 produced by macrophages, neutrophils and endothelial cells – IL‐1 increases levels of next proinflammatory cytokines in cascade, IL‐2 and IL‐12. – IL‐1 does NOT cause apoptosis Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Interleukin‐10 – Anti‐inflammatory cytokine – Inhibits production of IL‐12 – Inhibits T‐cell activation Septic Shock –Gram Positive • Gram positive sepsis – Gram positive cell wall components are also known to be involved in septic response – Peptidoglycans – Teichoic Acid – Likely act in a similar manner as LPS, but less potent on a weight bases.
  • Pneumonia in the Context of Severe Sepsis: a Significant Diagnostic Problem

    Pneumonia in the Context of Severe Sepsis: a Significant Diagnostic Problem

    -1 plasma D-dimer level was low (282 mg?L ). Chest radiography affected by antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome and showed multiple ill-defined increased densities in both lower avoided diagnostic surgery. lung fields. High-resolution computed tomography was then In conclusion, we believe that the indications for use of performed and showed ill-defined, wedge-shaped increased endobronchial ultrasound are manifold and are certainly densities with patent airways in the posterior subpleural greater than those so far recognised. This procedure should regions of both lower lobes. The computed tomography therefore be implemented and further developed in interven- differential diagnosis was organising pneumonia, bronchop- tional pneumology. neumonia, Churg–Strauss syndrome, Wegener granulomato- sis, pulmonary haemorrhage, or vasculitis of various causes. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in the right lower G.L. Casoni, C. Gurioli, M. Romagnoli and V. Poletti lobe. Microscopic examination showed alveolar haemorrhage Thoracic Dept, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Forlı´, Italy. without evidence of vasculitis, eosinophilic infiltration or organising pneumonia. Serum circulating antiphospholipid STATEMENT OF INTEREST antibodies were eventually found. Therefore, pulmonary None declared. angiography was performed and an intra-arterial low density was found in the right main pulmonary artery. This finding SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL was believed to be compatible with pulmonary thrombo- This article has supplementary material accessible from embolism; however, it didn’t exclude a possible right www.erj.ersjournals.com pulmonary artery sarcoma. In this case, the only procedure that would rule out the presence of a right pulmonary artery sarcoma (without delays in diagnosis) with any reasonable REFERENCES certainty was surgery. 1 Herth F, Becker HD, LoCicero J 3rd, Ernst A., Endobronchial We decided to perform rigid bronchoscopy under general ultrasound in therapeutic bronchoscopy.
  • What Is Sepsis?

    What Is Sepsis?

    What is sepsis? Sepsis is a serious medical condition resulting from an infection. As part of the body’s inflammatory response to fight infection, chemicals are released into the bloodstream. These chemicals can cause blood vessels to leak and clot, meaning organs like the kidneys, lung, and heart will not get enough oxygen. The blood clots can also decrease blood flow to the legs and arms leading to gangrene. There are three stages of sepsis: sepsis, severe sepsis, and ultimately septic shock. In the United States, there are more than one million cases with more than 258,000 deaths per year. More people die from sepsis each year than the combined deaths from prostate cancer, breast cancer, and HIV. More than 50 percent of people who develop the most severe form—septic shock—die. Septic shock is a life-threatening condition that happens when your blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level after an infection. Who is at risk? Anyone can get sepsis, but the elderly, infants, and people with weakened immune systems or chronic illnesses are most at risk. People in healthcare settings after surgery or with invasive central intravenous lines and urinary catheters are also at risk. Any type of infection can lead to sepsis, but sepsis is most often associated with pneumonia, abdominal infections, or kidney infections. What are signs and symptoms of sepsis? The initial symptoms of the first stage of sepsis are: A temperature greater than 101°F or less than 96.8°F A rapid heart rate faster than 90 beats per minute A rapid respiratory rate faster than 20 breaths per minute A change in mental status Additional symptoms may include: • Shivering, paleness, or shortness of breath • Confusion or difficulty waking up • Extreme pain (described as “worst pain ever”) Two or more of the symptoms suggest that someone is becoming septic and needs immediate medical attention.
  • Validation of Lactate Clearance at 6 H for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Children

    Validation of Lactate Clearance at 6 H for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Children

    570 Research Article Validation of lactate clearance at 6 h for mortality prediction in critically ill children Rajeev Kumar, Nirmal Kumar Background and Aims: To validate the lactate clearance (LC) at 6 h for mortality Access this article online prediction in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)-admitted patients and its comparison Website: www.ijccm.org with a pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM 2) score. Design: A prospective, observational DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.192040 study in a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: Children <13 years of age, Quick Response Code: Abstract admitted to PICU were included in the study. Lactate levels were measured at 0 and 6 h of admission for clearance. LC and delayed or nonclearance group compared for in-hospital mortality and compared with PIM 2 score for mortality prediction. Results: Of the 140 children (mean age 33.42 months) who were admitted to PICU, 23 (16.42%) patients died. For LC cut-off (16.435%) at 6 h, 92 patients qualified for clearance and 48 for delayed or non-LC group. High mortality was observed (39.6%) in delayed or non-LC group as compared to clearance group (4.3%) (P = 0.000). LC cut-off of 16.435% at 6 h (sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 75.2%, positive predictive value 39.6%, and negative predictive value 95.7%) correlates with mortality. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for LC at 6 h for mortality prediction was 0.823 (P = 0.000). The area under ROC curve for expected mortality prediction by PIM 2 score at admission was 0.906 and at 12.3% cut-off of PIM 2 Score was related with mortality.
  • Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: a Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial)

    Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: a Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial)

    Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial) RESEARCH PROTOCOL dr. Saptadi Yuliarto, Sp.A(K), MKes PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY AND INTENSIVE THERAPY SAIFUL ANWAR GENERAL HOSPITAL, MALANG MEDICAL FACULTY OF BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY DECEMBER 30, 2020 1 SUMMARY Research Title Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial) Research Design A multicentre experimental study in pediatric patients with a diagnosis of septic shock. Research Objective To examine the differences in fluid resuscitation outcomes for septic shock patients with the USSM and mACCM protocols • Patient mortality rate • Differences in clinical parameters • Differences in macrocirculation hemodynamic parameters • Differences in microcirculation laboratory parameters Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion: Pediatric patients (1 month - 18 years old), diagnosed with septic shock Exclusion: patients with congenital heart defects, already receiving fluid resuscitation or inotropic-vasoactive drugs prior to study recruitment, patients after cardiac surgery Research Setting A multicenter study conducted in all pediatric intensive care units (HCU / PICU), emergency department (IGD), and pediatric wards in participating hospitals in Indonesia. Sample Size Calculating the minimum sample size using the clinical trial formula for the mortality rate, obtained a sample size of 340 samples. Research Period The study was carried out in the period January 2021 to December 2022 Data Collection Process Pediatric patients who met the study inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups, namely the intervention group (USSM protocol) or the control group (mACCM protocol). Patients who respond well to resuscitation will have their outcome analyzed in the first hour (15-60 minutes). Patients with fluid refractory shock will have their output analyzed at 6 hours.
  • Approach to Shock.” These Podcasts Are Designed to Give Medical Students an Overview of Key Topics in Pediatrics

    Approach to Shock.” These Podcasts Are Designed to Give Medical Students an Overview of Key Topics in Pediatrics

    PedsCases Podcast Scripts This is a text version of a podcast from Pedscases.com on “Approach to Shock.” These podcasts are designed to give medical students an overview of key topics in pediatrics. The audio versions are accessible on iTunes or at www.pedcases.com/podcasts. Approach to Shock Developed by Dr. Dustin Jacobson and Dr Suzanne Beno for PedsCases.com. December 20, 2016 My name is Dustin Jacobson, a 3rd year pediatrics resident from the University of Toronto. This podcast was supervised by Dr. Suzanne Beno, a staff physician in the division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine at the University of Toronto. Today, we’ll discuss an approach to shock in children. First, we’ll define shock and understand it’s pathophysiology. Next, we’ll examine the subclassifications of shock. Last, we’ll review some basic and more advanced treatment for shock But first, let’s start with a case. Jonny is a 6-year-old male who presents with lethargy that is preceded by 2 days of a diarrheal illness. He has not urinated over the previous 24 hours. On assessment, he is tachycardic and hypotensive. He is febrile at 40 degrees Celsius, and is moaning on assessment, but spontaneously breathing. We’ll revisit this case including evaluation and management near the end of this podcast. The term “shock” is essentially a ‘catch-all’ phrase that refers to a state of inadequate oxygen or nutrient delivery for tissue metabolic demand. This broad definition incorporates many causes that eventually lead to this end-stage state. Basic oxygen delivery is determined by cardiac output and content of oxygen in the blood.
  • Septic, Hypovolemic, Obstructive and Cardiogenic Killers

    Septic, Hypovolemic, Obstructive and Cardiogenic Killers

    S.H.O.C.K Septic, Hypovolemic, Obstructive and Cardiogenic Killers Jason Ferguson, BPA, NRP Public Safety Programs Head, CVCC Amherst County DPS, Paramedic Centra One, Flight Paramedic Objectives • Define Shock • Review patho and basic components of life • Identify the types of shock • Identify treatments Shock Defined • “Rude unhinging of the machinery of life”- Samuel Gross, U.S. Trauma Surgeon, 1962 • “A momentary pause in the act of death”- John Warren, U.S. Surgeon, 1895 • Inadequate tissue perfusion Components of Life Blood Flow Right Lungs Heart Left Body Heart Patho Review • Preload • Afterload • Baroreceptors Perfusion Preservation Basic rules of shock management: • Maintain airway • Maintain oxygenation and ventilation • Control bleeding where possible • Maintain circulation • Adequate heart rate and intravascular volume ITLS Cases Case 1 • 11 month old female “not acting right” • Found in crib this am lethargic • Airway patent • Breathing is increased; LS clr • Circulation- weak distal pulses; pale and cool Case 1 • VS: RR 48, HR 140, O2 98%, Cap refill >2 secs • Foul smelling diapers x 1 day • “I must have changed her two dozen times yesterday” • Not eating or drinking much Case 1 • IV established after 4 attempts • Fluid bolus initiated • Transported to ED • Received 2 liters of fluid over next 24 hours Hypovolemic Shock Hemorrhage Diarrhea/Vomiting Hypovolemia Burns Peritonitis Shock Progression Compensated to decompensated • Initial rise in blood pressure due to shunting • Initial narrowing of pulse pressure • Diastolic raised
  • Hospital Toolkit for Adult Sepsis Surveillance CS289729-A

    Hospital Toolkit for Adult Sepsis Surveillance CS289729-A

    Hospital Toolkit for Adult Sepsis Surveillance CS289729-A MARCH 2018 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Background ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Objectives .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Surveillance Settings and Appropriate Use .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4
  • Pathophysiology of Meningococcal Meningitis and Septicaemia N Pathan, S N Faust, M Levin

    Pathophysiology of Meningococcal Meningitis and Septicaemia N Pathan, S N Faust, M Levin

    601 CURRENT TOPIC Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.7.601 on 1 July 2003. Downloaded from Pathophysiology of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia N Pathan, S N Faust, M Levin ............................................................................................................................. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:601–607 Neisseria meningitidis is remarkable for the diversity of The human immune system has a number of interactions that the bacterium has with the human host, different mechanisms to limit the growth of meningococci in blood. Both the older innate ranging from asymptomatic nasopharyngeal immune system and acquired immunity through colonisation affecting virtually all members of the antibodies, T and B cells play a role. The population; through focal infections of the meninges, epidemiology of meningococcal disease clearly indicates that the development of specific anti- joints, or eye; to the devastating and often fatal body is the most important immunoprotective syndrome of meningococcal septic shock and purpura mechanism.78 The peak incidence of the disease fulminans. occurs in the first year of life following the loss of maternal antibody; the disease becomes progres- .......................................................................... sively less common throughout childhood and is extremely rare in adults, a pattern suggestive of a n the past few decades, considerable progress major role for acquired immunity through anti- has been made in understanding the complex bodies. The studies