DOCSLIB.ORG

Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis Awaiting Liver Transplantation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sepsis in Patients with Cirrhosis Awaiting Liver Transplantation REVIEW ARTICLE MARTIN MATEOS AND ALBILLOS Sepsis in Patients With Cirrhosis Awaiting Liver Transplantation: New Trends and Management Rosa Martin Mateos and Agustín Albillos Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain Bacterial infections are more frequent and severe in patients with advanced liver disease and, therefore, in liver transplant candidates. The increased risk of infection in these patients parallels the severity of the immune dysfunction associated with cirrhosis, which is related to systemic inflammation and progressive immunodeficiency. Other factors contribute to this risk, such as genetic polymorphisms, proton pump inhibitor overuse, the numerous invasive procedures and hospitalizations these patients go through, or the immunosuppressive effects of malnutrition or alcohol abuse. Bacterial infections have a great impact on disease progression and significantly increase mortality rates before and after liver transplantation. Mechanisms leading to organ failure in sepsis are associated not only with the hemodynamic derangement but also with an excessive inflam- matory response triggered by infection. Furthermore, prophylactic and empirical antibiotic treatment strategies in patients with cirrhosis are being modified according to the growing prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the past decade. Also, new criteria have been introduced for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock. These new definitions have been validated in patients with cirrhosis and show a better accuracy to predict in-hospital mortality than previous criteria based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Accurate prophylaxis and early identification and treatment of bacterial infections are key to reducing the burden of sepsis in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 25 1700‒1709 2019 AASLD. Received April 4, 2019; accepted August 6, 2019. Patients with cirrhosis present an increased risk of decreasing, the risk of sepsis-related death has increased developing bacterial infections,(1) which are, in addition, over the past few years (incidence risk ratio, 4.70; 95% more severe than in the general population (estimated confidence interval, 4.61-4.79).(5) Bacterial infections overall mortality of 38%(2) and up to 70% in case of sep- are the most identifiable triggers of acute-on-chronic tic shock versus 10% and 40%, respectively, for a gen- liver failure (ACLF), accounting for 32% of the precipi- eral hospital population).(3,4) Notably, although overall tating events.(6) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) mortality among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis is and urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most fre- quent type, followed by pneumonia and cellulitis. Several changes in the epidemiology of bacterial Abbreviations: ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; AKI, acute kidney infections have occurred over the past decade. The injury; CAID, cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction; DAMP, most relevant is the increasing prevalence of mul- damage-associated molecular pattern; EASL, European Association for the Study of the Liver; ESBLE, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase– tidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria both in Europe (7) (8) producing Enterobacteriaceae; HRS, hepatorenal syndrome; ICU, (29%) and worldwide (34%). MDR pathogens intensive care unit; IV, intravenous; MDR, multidrug-resistant; are resistant to at least 1 agent in 3 or more antimi- NOD2, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing protein 2; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; PMN, crobial categories. When bacteria are resistant to at polymorphonuclear leukocyte; PRR, pattern recognition receptor; least 1 agent in all but 2 or fewer antimicrobial cate- qSOFA, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SBP, spontaneous gories, they are considered extensively drug resistant, bacterial peritonitis; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; and when not susceptible to any currently available SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; TLR2, toll-like receptor (9) 2; UTI, urinary tract infection; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic agent, they are defined as pandrug-resistant bacteria. surgery; VRE, vancomycin-resistant enterococci; WBC, white blood cell. The most common MDR pathogens are extended- spectrum ß-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae 1700 | REVIEW ARTICLE LIVER TraNSPLANTATION, Vol. 25, No. 11, 2019 MARTIN MATEOS AND ALBILLOS (ESBLE; ie, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae), interactions between the gut and the liver. The intes- AmpC ß-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae tinal surface is formed by physical defenses, includ- (ie, Enterobacter and Citrobacter spp.), carbapene- ing a layer of epithelial cells interconnected by tight mase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ie, Klebsiella spp., junctions, and functional defenses, such as the mucous E. Coli, and Enterobacter spp.), methicillin-resistant layer. The intestinal barrier displays a unique immune Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant entero- system capable of distinguishing between regular nu- cocci (VRE; ie, Enterococcus faecium). trient flux, self-antigens, a diverse milieu of commen- A higher susceptibility to infections significantly sal bacteria, and invading pathogens. increases morbidity and mortality and, thus, deterio- Cirrhosis is associated with profound alterations rates the quality of life of patients with cirrhosis await- at different levels of the intestinal barrier. Dysbiosis ing liver transplantation. Strategies aimed at improving (reduced abundance of protective bacteria and diagnosis of infection, prophylaxis, and treatment are increased pathogenic species) and bacterial overgrowth therefore needed. This review examines the mecha- are a result of intestinal hypomotility, changes in bile nisms responsible for the high rate of bacterial infec- flow and composition, and impaired intestinal immu- tions in patients with cirrhosis and provides an overview nity. Disruption of the epithelial and vascular intestinal of the key clinical features and prognostic implications barriers enables passage of viable bacteria and patho- of sepsis in patients awaiting liver transplantation. gen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) through the vascular and lymphatic routes to the systemic cir- culation. Bacterial translocation is further aggravated Altered Immune Response in sepsis due to alterations in perfusion, vascular tone, and coagulation that lead to a hypoxic microenviron- in Cirrhosis and Sepsis ment of the intestinal tissue. PATHOLOGICAL BACTERIAL CIRRHOSIS-ASSOCIATED IMMUNE TRANSLOCATION DYSFUNCTION The mucosa of the intestine is a highly organized Systemic inflammation due to persistent immune sys- and compartmentalized structure that controls the tem stimulation and progressive immunodeficiency characterize what is known as cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction (CAID).(1) Immunodeficiency Address reprint requests to Agustín Albillos, M.D., Ph.D., Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario affects cellular and soluble components of the immune Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal system both at the liver and systemically. The abnor- de Investigación Sanitaria, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en malities include the following: Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Carretera de Colmenar Viejo km 9100, 28034 Madrid, 1. Compromise of the immune surveillance function Spain. Telephone: +34 913368592; FAX: +34 913368592; E-mail: of the liver through damage of the reticuloen- [email protected] dothelial system. Supported by grants from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación 2. Impaired synthesis of innate immunity proteins. y Universidades, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (number PI14/00876), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas 3. Altered functions of circulating and intestinal y Digestivas (CB06/04/0024), and Ministerio de Economía, Industria populations of immune cells (specifically reduced y Competitividad (SAF 2017-86343-R) awarded to Agustín Albillos. chemotaxis and oxidative burst of neutrophils), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Grants impaired phagocytic activity of antigen-presenting were cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund “A way cells, and exhaustion of the adaptive immune to achieve Europe.” response.(1,10) Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver On the other hand, systemic inflammation is Diseases. prompted by increased intestinal permeability, bac- View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. terial overgrowth, and dysbiosis, which favors trans- DOI 10.1002/lt.25621 location of bacteria and PAMPs. Specific receptors activated by PAMPs (also called pattern recognition Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report. receptors [PRRs]) amplify proinflammatory signaling. Intracellular molecules released by injured or dead cells REVIEW ARTICLE | 1701 MARTIN MATEOS AND ALBILLOS LIVER TraNSPLANTATION, November 2019 (damage-associated molecular patterns [DAMPs]) are Because the new definition of sepsis requires a base- also recognized by PRRs, and they contribute to per- line calculation of the SOFA score, an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Nervous System Dysfunction As the First Manifestation of Multiple
    Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 79–83 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0268–3369/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/bmt Central nervous system dysfunction as the first manifestation of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in stem cell transplant patients B Gordon1, E Lyden2, J Lynch2, S Tarantolo3, ZS Pavletic3, M Bishop3, E Reed3, A Kessinger3 and W Haire3 Departments of 1Pediatrics, 2Preventive and Societal Medicine, and 3Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA Summary: Organ system dysfunction is a frequent complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Single and multior- Development of CNS dysfunction in the setting of hema- gan dysfunction may be due to the culmination of an uncon- topoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has been pre- trolled inflammatory response to some initial event, viously shown to predict for subsequent second organ mediated by an as yet incompletely understood interplay of dysfunction and death. In this paper, we describe the cytokines, complement, and the coagulation system. In the characteristics of this isolated CNS dysfunction, and its setting of acutely ill non-transplant patients, this has been relationship to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome termed the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.1 (MODS) after HSCT. Twenty-one of 186 patients This syndrome has been well described in patients with undergoing HSCT developed CNS dysfunction as their trauma or severe infection,1–3 but has only recently been first organ dysfunction a mean of 22.8 ± 0.9 days after recognized in patients undergoing HSCT. the start of the preparative regimen. Compared with The occurrence of single organ system dysfunction in 137 patients who developed no organ dysfunction, the post-transplant period has been shown to predict for patients presenting with CNS dysfunction were more subsequent development of multiple organ dysfunction and likely to have undergone allogeneic HSCT (P = 0.001) death.
    [Show full text]
  • Sepsis: a Guide for Patients & Relatives
    SEPSIS: A GUIDE FOR PATIENTS & RELATIVES CONTENTS ABOUT SEPSIS ABOUT SEPSIS: INTRODUCTION P3 What is sepsis? In the UK, at least 150,000* people each year suffer from serious P4 Why does sepsis happen? sepsis. Worldwide it is thought that 3 in a 1000 people get sepsis P4 Different types of sepsis P4 Who is at risk of getting sepsis? each year, which means that 18 million people are affected. P5 What sepsis does to your body Sepsis can move from a mild illness to a serious one very quickly, TREATMENT OF SEPSIS which is very frightening for patients and their relatives. P7 Why did I need to go to the Critical Care Unit? This booklet is for patients and relatives and it explains sepsis P8 What treatment might I have had? and its causes, the treatment needed and what might help after P9 What other help might I have received in the Critical Care Unit? having sepsis. It has been written by the UK Sepsis Trust, a charity P10 How might I have felt in the Critical Care Unit? which supports people who have had sepsis and campaigns to P11 How long might I stay in the Critical Care Unit and hospital? raise awareness of the illness, in collaboration with ICU steps. P11 Moving to a general ward and The Outreach Team/Patient at Risk Team If a patient cannot read this booklet for him or herself, it may be helpful for AFTER SEPSIS relatives to read it. This will help them to understand what the patient is going through and they will be more able to support them as they recover.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide
    Stanford Health Issue Date: 05/2017 Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide Table 1: Antibiotic selection options for healthcare associated and/or immunocompromised patients • Healthcare associated: intravenous therapy, wound care, or intravenous chemotherapy within the prior 30 days, residence in a nursing home or other long-term care facility, hospitalization in an acute care hospital for two or more days within the prior 90 days, attendance at a hospital or hemodialysis clinic within the prior 30 days • Immunocompromised: Receiving chemotherapy, known systemic cancer not in remission, ANC <500, severe cell-mediated immune deficiency Table 2: Antibiotic selection options for community acquired, immunocompetent patients Table 3: Antibiotic selection options for patients with simple sepsis, community acquired, immunocompetent patients requiring hospitalization. Risk Factors for Select Organisms P. aeruginosa MRSA Invasive Candidiasis VRE (and other resistant GNR) Community acquired: • Known colonization with MDROs • Central venous catheter • Liver transplant • Prior IV antibiotics within 90 day • Recent MRSA infection • Broad-spectrum antibiotics • Known colonization • Known colonization with MDROs • Known MRSA colonization • + 1 of the following risk factors: • Prolonged broad antibacterial • Skin & Skin Structure and/or IV access site: ♦ Parenteral nutrition therapy Hospital acquired: ♦ Purulence ♦ Dialysis • Prolonged profound • Prior IV antibiotics within 90 days ♦ Abscess
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Timothy G. Buchman, Ph.D., MD
    Physiologic Failure: Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Timothy G. Buchman, Ph.D., M.D. Edison Professor of Surgery Professor of Anesthesiology and of Medicine Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri 63110 [email protected] Acknowledgement: This work was supported, in part, by award GM48095 from the National Institutes of Health 2 Buchman Humans, like other life forms, can be viewed as thermodynamically open systems that continuously consume energy to maintain stability in the internal milieu in the face of ongoing environmental stress. In contrast to simple unicellular life forms such as bacteria, higher life forms must maintain stability not only in individual cells but also for the organism as a whole. To this end, a collection of physiologic systems evolved to process foodstuffs; to acquire oxygen and dispose of gaseous waste; to eliminate excess fluid and soluble toxins; and to perform other tasks. These systems—labeled respiratory, circulatory, digestive, neurological, and so on—share several features. • Physiological systems are spatially distributed. Food has to get from mouth to anus. Urine is made in the kidneys but has to exit the urethra. Blood may be pumped by the heart but has to reach the great toe. • Physiologic systems are generally spacefilling and structurally fractal. Each cell has demand for nutrients; each cell excretes waste. Information has to travel from the brain throughout the body. While not every physiologic system is self-similar at all levels of granularity, there is typically a nested architecture that facilitates function: microvillus to villus to intestinal mucosa; alveolus to alveolar unit to bronchial segment; capillary to arteriole to artery.
    [Show full text]
  • Septic Shock V9.0 Patient Flow Map
    Septic Shock v9.0 Patient Flow Map Approval & Citation Summary of Version Changes Explanation of Evidence Ratings Patient presents to the ED with fever and/or concern for infection and ED sepsis score ≥ 6 ! BPA fires Use the ED Suspected Septic Shock RN and Well-appearing patients should be placed pathway for all ill on the appropriate ED CSW pathway for Provider appearing patients their underlying condition (e.g. ED No including HemOnc/BMT, Huddle: HemOnc BMT Suspected Infection, ED Central Line Infection Is the patient ill Suspected Central Line Infection, ED and Neonates appearing? Neonatal Fever) Yes ED Septic Shock Pathway • Use ED Suspected Septic Shock Plan • Antibiotics and blood cultures for specific populations included Inpatient Admit Criteria Does NOT meet Inpatient Admit Minute criteria • Resolution of hypotension and no • Admit to ICU ongoing signs of sepsis after ≤ 40 ml / 60 Huddle: YES NO • Follow ICU Septic Shock Pathway kg NS bolus Does patient meet • Use PICU/CICU Septic Shock Admit • First dose antibiotics administered Inpatient admit Plan • RISK to follow criteria? • Antibiotics, blood cultures for specific populations included in sub plans Previously healthy > 30 days RISK RN to follow all • Admit to General Medicine patients admitted with • Follow Admit from ED Septic Shock concern for sepsis Pathway • Use Inpatient Septic Shock Plan ! Concern for evolving sepsis Previously healthy < 30 days Any • Admit to General Medicine admitted • Call RRT or Code Blue • Follow Neonatal Fever Pathway patient with • Follow Inpatient
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers
    World J. Surg. 7, 143-148, 1983 Wor Journal of Stirgery Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers S. Olerud, M.D., and M. Allg6wer, M.D. The Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden, and the Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland A questionnaire was sent to the following 6 trauma centers: Paris: Two or more peripheral, visceral, or com- University Hospital for Accident Surgery, Hannover, Fed- plex injuries with respiratory and circulatory fail- eral Republic of Germany (Prof. H. Tscherne); University ure. (This excludes patients who only have sus- of Munich, Department of Surgery, Klinikum Grossha- tained fractures.) dern, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany (Prof. G. Dallas: Multiply injured patient presenting le- Heberer); Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden (Prof. sions to 2 cavities, associated with 2 or more long S. Olerud); University Hospital, Department of Surgery, bone failures; lesions to 1 cavity associated with 2 Basel, Switzerland (Prof. M. Allgiiwer); H6pital de la Piti~, or more long bone failures; or lesions to multiple Paris, France (Prof. R. Roy-Camille); and University of extremities (at minimum, 3 long bone failures). Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. (Prof. B. Claudi). Their answers have been summarized in a few short paragraphs where tabulation was not possible, Do You Grade Polytrauma, and If So, How? and then mainly in tabular form for convenient comparison among the various centers. There seems to be considerable international agreement on the main points of early aggres- Hannover: Yes, with our own grading system along sive cardiopulmonary management to prevent multiple with ISS and AIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring
    Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring Matthew Bank, MD, FACS Assistant Professor Hofstra North Shore‐LIJ School of Medicine Director, Surgical Intensive Care Unit North Shore University Hospital I do not have any financial conflicts of interest to disclose for this presentation Shock • Multiple different strategies for classifying shock, but all forms of shock result in impaired oxygen delivery secondary to either one or both: – reduced cardiac output (cardiogenic, septic) OR – loss of effective intravascular volume (hypovolemic, neurogenic, anaphylactic, septic). Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Gram negative septic shock: —Very studied well studied in animal models —Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in bacterial cell wall binds to LPS binding protein. —LPS‐LBP complex then binds to cell surface CD14 receptors on monocytes and macrophages. —The LPS‐LBP‐CD14 complex then activates cells via Toll‐like receptor‐4 (TLR4). —TLR4 then “activates” cells which produce a cytokine “cascade” of proinflamatory mediators. Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) – First cytokine produced in response to gram negative sepsis – Principal mediator for acute response to gram negative bacteria – Major source of TNF is from activated macrophages – High levels of TNF predict mortality and can cause apoptosis. Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) – Levels of IL‐1 increase soon after TNF production in gram negative sepsis (second cytokine to be elevated) – IL‐1 produced by macrophages, neutrophils and endothelial cells – IL‐1 increases levels of next proinflammatory cytokines in cascade, IL‐2 and IL‐12. – IL‐1 does NOT cause apoptosis Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Interleukin‐10 – Anti‐inflammatory cytokine – Inhibits production of IL‐12 – Inhibits T‐cell activation Septic Shock –Gram Positive • Gram positive sepsis – Gram positive cell wall components are also known to be involved in septic response – Peptidoglycans – Teichoic Acid – Likely act in a similar manner as LPS, but less potent on a weight bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Pneumonia in the Context of Severe Sepsis: a Significant Diagnostic Problem
    -1 plasma D-dimer level was low (282 mg?L ). Chest radiography affected by antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome and showed multiple ill-defined increased densities in both lower avoided diagnostic surgery. lung fields. High-resolution computed tomography was then In conclusion, we believe that the indications for use of performed and showed ill-defined, wedge-shaped increased endobronchial ultrasound are manifold and are certainly densities with patent airways in the posterior subpleural greater than those so far recognised. This procedure should regions of both lower lobes. The computed tomography therefore be implemented and further developed in interven- differential diagnosis was organising pneumonia, bronchop- tional pneumology. neumonia, Churg–Strauss syndrome, Wegener granulomato- sis, pulmonary haemorrhage, or vasculitis of various causes. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in the right lower G.L. Casoni, C. Gurioli, M. Romagnoli and V. Poletti lobe. Microscopic examination showed alveolar haemorrhage Thoracic Dept, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Forlı´, Italy. without evidence of vasculitis, eosinophilic infiltration or organising pneumonia. Serum circulating antiphospholipid STATEMENT OF INTEREST antibodies were eventually found. Therefore, pulmonary None declared. angiography was performed and an intra-arterial low density was found in the right main pulmonary artery. This finding SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL was believed to be compatible with pulmonary thrombo- This article has supplementary material accessible from embolism; however, it didn’t exclude a possible right www.erj.ersjournals.com pulmonary artery sarcoma. In this case, the only procedure that would rule out the presence of a right pulmonary artery sarcoma (without delays in diagnosis) with any reasonable REFERENCES certainty was surgery. 1 Herth F, Becker HD, LoCicero J 3rd, Ernst A., Endobronchial We decided to perform rigid bronchoscopy under general ultrasound in therapeutic bronchoscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Sepsis?
    What is sepsis? Sepsis is a serious medical condition resulting from an infection. As part of the body’s inflammatory response to fight infection, chemicals are released into the bloodstream. These chemicals can cause blood vessels to leak and clot, meaning organs like the kidneys, lung, and heart will not get enough oxygen. The blood clots can also decrease blood flow to the legs and arms leading to gangrene. There are three stages of sepsis: sepsis, severe sepsis, and ultimately septic shock. In the United States, there are more than one million cases with more than 258,000 deaths per year. More people die from sepsis each year than the combined deaths from prostate cancer, breast cancer, and HIV. More than 50 percent of people who develop the most severe form—septic shock—die. Septic shock is a life-threatening condition that happens when your blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level after an infection. Who is at risk? Anyone can get sepsis, but the elderly, infants, and people with weakened immune systems or chronic illnesses are most at risk. People in healthcare settings after surgery or with invasive central intravenous lines and urinary catheters are also at risk. Any type of infection can lead to sepsis, but sepsis is most often associated with pneumonia, abdominal infections, or kidney infections. What are signs and symptoms of sepsis? The initial symptoms of the first stage of sepsis are: A temperature greater than 101°F or less than 96.8°F A rapid heart rate faster than 90 beats per minute A rapid respiratory rate faster than 20 breaths per minute A change in mental status Additional symptoms may include: • Shivering, paleness, or shortness of breath • Confusion or difficulty waking up • Extreme pain (described as “worst pain ever”) Two or more of the symptoms suggest that someone is becoming septic and needs immediate medical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Sepsis-3 Definitions. What Are They, and How Should We Use Them?
    Sepsis-3 definitions. What are they, and how should we use them? William T. Browne, MD, FCCM October 28, 2016 ACCP/SCCM Consensus Definitions • SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) – Temperature > 38° C or < 36° C – Heart rate > 90 – Respiratory rate > 20 or pCO2 < 32 mm Hg – WBC > 12,000 or < 4,000 or > 10% bands • Any two of the criteria needed for SIRS diagnosis ACCP/SCCM Consensus Definitions • Sepsis – Must have diagnosis of SIRS – Clinical evidence of infection • bacteremia • infiltrate on CXR • abscess on imaging study ACCP/SCCM Consensus Definitions • Severe sepsis – must have diagnosis of sepsis – evidence of organ dysfunction • Organ dysfunction – increase in BUN/creatinine – elevated LFTs – hypoxia – elevated serum lactate ACCP/SCCM Consensus Definitions • Septic shock – must have findings of severe sepsis – hypotension after adequate fluid resuscitation – systolic BP 40 mm Hg below baseline – may not have hypotension if receiving pressor agents Was this a useful bedside tool? Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection Under these new definitions Sepsis(new) = Severe Sepsis(old) Key concepts of sepsis (1) • Sepsis is the primary cause of death from infection, especially if not recognized and treated promptly. Its recognition mandates urgent attention • Sepsis is a syndrome shaped by pathogen factors and host factors (eg, sex, race and other genetic determinants, age, comorbidities, environment) with characteristics that evolve over time. What differentiates sepsis from infection is an aberrant or dysregulated host response and the presence of organ dysfunction. Key concepts of sepsis (2) • Sepsis-induced organ dysfunction may be occult; therefore, its presence should be considered in any patient presenting with infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Large Animal Model of Lethal Polytrauma and Intra
    Open access Original research Trauma Surg Acute Care Open: first published as 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000636 on 1 February 2021. Downloaded from Development of a large animal model of lethal polytrauma and intra- abdominal sepsis with bacteremia Rachel L O’Connell, Glenn K Wakam , Ali Siddiqui, Aaron M Williams, Nathan Graham, Michael T Kemp, Kiril Chtraklin, Umar F Bhatti, Alizeh Shamshad, Yongqing Li, Hasan B Alam, Ben E Biesterveld ► Additional material is ABSTRACT abdomen and pelvic contents. The same review published online only. To view, Background Trauma and sepsis are individually two of showed that of patients with whole body injuries, please visit the journal online 1 (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ the leading causes of death worldwide. When combined, 37.9% had penetrating injuries. The abdomen is tsaco- 2020- 000636). the mortality is greater than 50%. Thus, it is imperative one area of the body which is particularly suscep- to have a reproducible and reliable animal model to tible to penetrating injuries.2 In a review of patients Surgery, Michigan Medicine, study the effects of polytrauma and sepsis and test novel in Afghanistan with penetrating abdominal wounds, University of Michigan, Ann treatment options. Porcine models are more translatable the majority of injuries were to the gastrointes- Arbor, Michigan, USA to humans than rodent models due to the similarities tinal tract with the most common injury being to 3 Correspondence to in anatomy and physiological response. We embarked the small bowel. While this severe constellation Dr Glenn K Wakam; gw akam@ on a study to develop a reproducible model of lethal of injuries is uncommon in the civilian setting, med.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of Sepsis Management
    Essentials of Sepsis Management John M. Green, MD KEYWORDS Sepsis Sepsis syndrome Surgical infection Septic shock Goal-directed therapy KEY POINTS Successful treatment of perioperative sepsis relies on the early recognition, diagnosis, and aggressive treatment of the underlying infection; delay in resuscitation, source control, or antimicrobial therapy can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. When sepsis is suspected, appropriate cultures should be obtained immediately so that antimicrobial therapy is not delayed; initiation of diagnostic tests, resuscitative measures, and therapeutic interventions should otherwise occur concomitantly to ensure the best outcome. Early, aggressive, invasive monitoring is appropriate to ensure adequate resuscitation and to observe the response to therapy. Any patient suspected of having sepsis should be in a location where adequate resources can be provided. INTRODUCTION Sepsis is among the most common conditions encountered in critical care, and septic shock is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Indeed, sepsis is among the 10 most common causes of death in the United States.1 Martin and colleagues2 showed that surgical patients account for nearly one-third of sepsis cases in the United States. Despite advanced knowledge in the field, sepsis remains a common threat to life in the perioperative period. Survival relies on early recognition and timely targeted correction of the syndrome’s root cause as well as ongoing organ support. The objective of this article is to review strategies for detection and timely management of sepsis in the perioperative surgical patient. A comprehensive review of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of organ dysfunc- tion and sepsis management is beyond the scope of this article.
    [Show full text]