DOCSLIB.ORG

Pathophysiology of Meningococcal Meningitis and Septicaemia N Pathan, S N Faust, M Levin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pathophysiology of Meningococcal Meningitis and Septicaemia N Pathan, S N Faust, M Levin 601 CURRENT TOPIC Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.7.601 on 1 July 2003. Downloaded from Pathophysiology of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia N Pathan, S N Faust, M Levin ............................................................................................................................. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:601–607 Neisseria meningitidis is remarkable for the diversity of The human immune system has a number of interactions that the bacterium has with the human host, different mechanisms to limit the growth of meningococci in blood. Both the older innate ranging from asymptomatic nasopharyngeal immune system and acquired immunity through colonisation affecting virtually all members of the antibodies, T and B cells play a role. The population; through focal infections of the meninges, epidemiology of meningococcal disease clearly indicates that the development of specific anti- joints, or eye; to the devastating and often fatal body is the most important immunoprotective syndrome of meningococcal septic shock and purpura mechanism.78 The peak incidence of the disease fulminans. occurs in the first year of life following the loss of maternal antibody; the disease becomes progres- .......................................................................... sively less common throughout childhood and is extremely rare in adults, a pattern suggestive of a n the past few decades, considerable progress major role for acquired immunity through anti- has been made in understanding the complex bodies. The studies of Goldschneider and Gottlieb Iinteraction of host and pathogen, and the established that the age related incidence of the pathophysiology underlying both meningococcal disease in the population is related to the septicaemia and meningitis. This increased un- presence of bactericidal antibodies in serum.7 derstanding has resulted in improved manage- Although antibody appears to be the primary ment of the disorder, and is likely to lead to the protective mechanism, there is also evidence that introduction of new forms of treatment innate immune mechanisms are important in protecting infants, particularly in the window of HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION: time between colonisation of the nasopharynx COLONISATION, INVASION, AND and the development of protective immune SURVIVAL IN THE BLOODSTREAM response. All three components of the comple- The reasons why invasive disease occurs in a very ment pathway—classical pathway through anti- http://adc.bmj.com/ small percentage of individuals are not well body; alternative pathway through properdin; understood. A variety of factors including preced- and the newly discovered mannose binding lectin ing viral infections, inhalation of dry dusty air, or pathway—are important in the protection against exposure to passive smoking have been associated meningococcal disease. Individuals deficient in with invasive disease.1 terminal components of the complement path- The meningococcus is able to adhere to way, as well as those with properdin deficiency, non-ciliated epithelial cells through a number of suffer recurrent infection.910 Individuals with adhesion factors, including pili.2 The bacterium mutations in the mannose binding lectin gene on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. has a number of mechanisms enabling it to avoid have an increased risk of meningococcal disease host immunological mechanisms in the na- but appear less likely to suffer recurrent infec- sopharynx, including production of IgA tions once antibodies have developed.11 protease,3 production of factors which inhibit cili- ary activity,4 and the possession of a polysaccha- ACTIVATION OF THE HOST IMMUNE ride capsule which promotes adherence and RESPONSE 5 inhibits opsonophagocytosis. The organism also A large body of evidence now indicates that much undergoes notable variation in the level of of the damage to host tissues is caused by activa- expression or structure of a variety of surface tion of host immune mechanisms (fig 1). antigens, including proteins and endotoxin, Although there are likely to be numerous See end of article for which enables the bacterium to evade the host bacterial factors that can trigger the host immune authors’ affiliations immune response. In the case of group B menin- response, endotoxin appears to be the most ....................... gococci, the polysaccharide structure is non- important. The studies of Brandtzaeg et al clearly Correspondence to: immunogenic, because of structural similarity established that the severity of meningococcal Prof. M Levin, Department with the human neural cell adhesion molecule septicaemia was directly related to levels of circu- 6 of Paediatrics, Faculty of (NCAM). lating endotoxin.12 The characteristic property of Medicine, Imperial College While the events which enable certain strains of Science, Technology & Medicine, Norfolk Place, of meningococci to pass through the nasopharyn- London W2 1PG, UK; geal membrane into the bloodstream remain ................................................. [email protected] poorly understood, it is clear that survival in the Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IL, interleukin; bloodstream, and the ability to multiply to high Accepted NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule; PAI, plasminogen 21 December 2002 numbers, are an essential requirement for severe activator inhibitor; TFPI, tissue factor pathway inhibitor; ....................... disease to occur. TNF, tumour necrosis factor www.archdischild.com 602 Pathan, Faust, Levin Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.7.601 on 1 July 2003. Downloaded from Figure 1 The inflammatory cascade in meningococcal septicaemia. meningococci to release blebs of outer membrane vesicles, lining in sepsis probably enable proteolytic enzymes to be which are rich in endotoxin, probably plays an important part released, which damage the endothelial surface.20 http://adc.bmj.com/ in releasing large quantities of endotoxin into the 13 bloodstream. MICROVASCULAR INJURY IN MENINGOCOCCAL Endotoxin is bound to a circulating plasma protein called SEPSIS endotoxin binding protein. The interaction between endotoxin There is now considerable evidence that indicates that the and endotoxin binding protein alters the conformation of major pathophysiological event occurring in meningococcal endotoxin to enable increased binding to and activation of septicaemia, which explains most of the severe physiological 14 macrophages and other inflammatory cells. The principle consequences of the disease, is related to a profound change in on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. cellular receptor for endotoxin is CD14, but a range of other the normal finely regulated functions of the microvasculature. endotoxin sensors on cell surfaces exist, including the toll like The vascular endothelial surface is a highly specialised organ, receptors, which are also important in activation of host regulating vascular permeability and presenting a thrombo- inflammatory cells.15 16 A soluble form of CD14 also acts as the resistant, non-reactive surface to circulating blood cells. These receptor for endotoxin on endothelial surfaces. Endotoxin highly specialised properties are lost during the inflammatory binding to these cells triggers an intense inflammatory process, occurring on entry of meningococci into the process. Macrophages undergo activation to produce a range bloodstream. The complex physiology of meningococcal sepsis of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumour necrosis fac- is largely explained by four basic processes affecting the tor α (TNFα) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β). Increased production microvasculature: of interferon γ by T cells and natural killer cells occurs, and the (1) Increased vascular permeability interferon γ in turn enhances production of TNF by the mac- (2) Pathological vasoconstriction and vasodilatation rophage. A number of studies have documented high levels of cytokines including TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF, IL-10, (3) Loss of thromboresistance and intravascular coagulation and interferon γ in meningococcal sepsis.17–19 In general (4) Profound myocardial dysfunction. cytokine levels are closely correlated with disease severity and These events are largely responsible for the development of risk of death. shock and multiorgan failure. Neutrophils appear to be activated both through the effects of endotoxin and through complement mediated stimuli. Increased vascular permeability and the capillary leak Neutrophils undergo a respiratory burst with the production syndrome of reactive oxygen species, as well as undergoing degranula- Hypovolaemia appears to be the most important early event tion and the release of a range of inflammatory proteins, pro- leading to shock and is a direct result of a gross increase in teases, and other enzymes, which can degrade tissues. Close vascular permeability. The inflammatory process induced by proximity and attachment of neutrophils to the endothelial meningococci results in a major change in the permeability www.archdischild.com Pathophysiology of meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia 603 Figure 2 (A) The inflammatory, coagulation, and fibrinolytic pathways are linked at many levels, Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.7.601 on 1 July 2003. Downloaded from leading to organ failure and eventually death. (B) The coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways rely on the function of endothelial proteins and protein complexes. Dysfunctional regulatory mechanisms in meningococcal disease include endothelial (protein
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide
    Stanford Health Issue Date: 05/2017 Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Antibiotic Guide Table 1: Antibiotic selection options for healthcare associated and/or immunocompromised patients • Healthcare associated: intravenous therapy, wound care, or intravenous chemotherapy within the prior 30 days, residence in a nursing home or other long-term care facility, hospitalization in an acute care hospital for two or more days within the prior 90 days, attendance at a hospital or hemodialysis clinic within the prior 30 days • Immunocompromised: Receiving chemotherapy, known systemic cancer not in remission, ANC <500, severe cell-mediated immune deficiency Table 2: Antibiotic selection options for community acquired, immunocompetent patients Table 3: Antibiotic selection options for patients with simple sepsis, community acquired, immunocompetent patients requiring hospitalization. Risk Factors for Select Organisms P. aeruginosa MRSA Invasive Candidiasis VRE (and other resistant GNR) Community acquired: • Known colonization with MDROs • Central venous catheter • Liver transplant • Prior IV antibiotics within 90 day • Recent MRSA infection • Broad-spectrum antibiotics • Known colonization • Known colonization with MDROs • Known MRSA colonization • + 1 of the following risk factors: • Prolonged broad antibacterial • Skin & Skin Structure and/or IV access site: ♦ Parenteral nutrition therapy Hospital acquired: ♦ Purulence ♦ Dialysis • Prolonged profound • Prior IV antibiotics within 90 days ♦ Abscess
    [Show full text]
  • Septic Shock V9.0 Patient Flow Map
    Septic Shock v9.0 Patient Flow Map Approval & Citation Summary of Version Changes Explanation of Evidence Ratings Patient presents to the ED with fever and/or concern for infection and ED sepsis score ≥ 6 ! BPA fires Use the ED Suspected Septic Shock RN and Well-appearing patients should be placed pathway for all ill on the appropriate ED CSW pathway for Provider appearing patients their underlying condition (e.g. ED No including HemOnc/BMT, Huddle: HemOnc BMT Suspected Infection, ED Central Line Infection Is the patient ill Suspected Central Line Infection, ED and Neonates appearing? Neonatal Fever) Yes ED Septic Shock Pathway • Use ED Suspected Septic Shock Plan • Antibiotics and blood cultures for specific populations included Inpatient Admit Criteria Does NOT meet Inpatient Admit Minute criteria • Resolution of hypotension and no • Admit to ICU ongoing signs of sepsis after ≤ 40 ml / 60 Huddle: YES NO • Follow ICU Septic Shock Pathway kg NS bolus Does patient meet • Use PICU/CICU Septic Shock Admit • First dose antibiotics administered Inpatient admit Plan • RISK to follow criteria? • Antibiotics, blood cultures for specific populations included in sub plans Previously healthy > 30 days RISK RN to follow all • Admit to General Medicine patients admitted with • Follow Admit from ED Septic Shock concern for sepsis Pathway • Use Inpatient Septic Shock Plan ! Concern for evolving sepsis Previously healthy < 30 days Any • Admit to General Medicine admitted • Call RRT or Code Blue • Follow Neonatal Fever Pathway patient with • Follow Inpatient
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers
    World J. Surg. 7, 143-148, 1983 Wor Journal of Stirgery Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers S. Olerud, M.D., and M. Allg6wer, M.D. The Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden, and the Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland A questionnaire was sent to the following 6 trauma centers: Paris: Two or more peripheral, visceral, or com- University Hospital for Accident Surgery, Hannover, Fed- plex injuries with respiratory and circulatory fail- eral Republic of Germany (Prof. H. Tscherne); University ure. (This excludes patients who only have sus- of Munich, Department of Surgery, Klinikum Grossha- tained fractures.) dern, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany (Prof. G. Dallas: Multiply injured patient presenting le- Heberer); Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden (Prof. sions to 2 cavities, associated with 2 or more long S. Olerud); University Hospital, Department of Surgery, bone failures; lesions to 1 cavity associated with 2 Basel, Switzerland (Prof. M. Allgiiwer); H6pital de la Piti~, or more long bone failures; or lesions to multiple Paris, France (Prof. R. Roy-Camille); and University of extremities (at minimum, 3 long bone failures). Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. (Prof. B. Claudi). Their answers have been summarized in a few short paragraphs where tabulation was not possible, Do You Grade Polytrauma, and If So, How? and then mainly in tabular form for convenient comparison among the various centers. There seems to be considerable international agreement on the main points of early aggres- Hannover: Yes, with our own grading system along sive cardiopulmonary management to prevent multiple with ISS and AIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring
    Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring Matthew Bank, MD, FACS Assistant Professor Hofstra North Shore‐LIJ School of Medicine Director, Surgical Intensive Care Unit North Shore University Hospital I do not have any financial conflicts of interest to disclose for this presentation Shock • Multiple different strategies for classifying shock, but all forms of shock result in impaired oxygen delivery secondary to either one or both: – reduced cardiac output (cardiogenic, septic) OR – loss of effective intravascular volume (hypovolemic, neurogenic, anaphylactic, septic). Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Gram negative septic shock: —Very studied well studied in animal models —Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in bacterial cell wall binds to LPS binding protein. —LPS‐LBP complex then binds to cell surface CD14 receptors on monocytes and macrophages. —The LPS‐LBP‐CD14 complex then activates cells via Toll‐like receptor‐4 (TLR4). —TLR4 then “activates” cells which produce a cytokine “cascade” of proinflamatory mediators. Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) – First cytokine produced in response to gram negative sepsis – Principal mediator for acute response to gram negative bacteria – Major source of TNF is from activated macrophages – High levels of TNF predict mortality and can cause apoptosis. Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) – Levels of IL‐1 increase soon after TNF production in gram negative sepsis (second cytokine to be elevated) – IL‐1 produced by macrophages, neutrophils and endothelial cells – IL‐1 increases levels of next proinflammatory cytokines in cascade, IL‐2 and IL‐12. – IL‐1 does NOT cause apoptosis Septic Shock –Gram Negative • Interleukin‐10 – Anti‐inflammatory cytokine – Inhibits production of IL‐12 – Inhibits T‐cell activation Septic Shock –Gram Positive • Gram positive sepsis – Gram positive cell wall components are also known to be involved in septic response – Peptidoglycans – Teichoic Acid – Likely act in a similar manner as LPS, but less potent on a weight bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Pneumonia in the Context of Severe Sepsis: a Significant Diagnostic Problem
    -1 plasma D-dimer level was low (282 mg?L ). Chest radiography affected by antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome and showed multiple ill-defined increased densities in both lower avoided diagnostic surgery. lung fields. High-resolution computed tomography was then In conclusion, we believe that the indications for use of performed and showed ill-defined, wedge-shaped increased endobronchial ultrasound are manifold and are certainly densities with patent airways in the posterior subpleural greater than those so far recognised. This procedure should regions of both lower lobes. The computed tomography therefore be implemented and further developed in interven- differential diagnosis was organising pneumonia, bronchop- tional pneumology. neumonia, Churg–Strauss syndrome, Wegener granulomato- sis, pulmonary haemorrhage, or vasculitis of various causes. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in the right lower G.L. Casoni, C. Gurioli, M. Romagnoli and V. Poletti lobe. Microscopic examination showed alveolar haemorrhage Thoracic Dept, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Forlı´, Italy. without evidence of vasculitis, eosinophilic infiltration or organising pneumonia. Serum circulating antiphospholipid STATEMENT OF INTEREST antibodies were eventually found. Therefore, pulmonary None declared. angiography was performed and an intra-arterial low density was found in the right main pulmonary artery. This finding SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL was believed to be compatible with pulmonary thrombo- This article has supplementary material accessible from embolism; however, it didn’t exclude a possible right www.erj.ersjournals.com pulmonary artery sarcoma. In this case, the only procedure that would rule out the presence of a right pulmonary artery sarcoma (without delays in diagnosis) with any reasonable REFERENCES certainty was surgery. 1 Herth F, Becker HD, LoCicero J 3rd, Ernst A., Endobronchial We decided to perform rigid bronchoscopy under general ultrasound in therapeutic bronchoscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • African Meningitis Belt
    WHO/EMC/BAC/98.3 Control of epidemic meningococcal disease. WHO practical guidelines. 2nd edition World Health Organization Emerging and other Communicable Diseases, Surveillance and Control This document has been downloaded from the WHO/EMC Web site. The original cover pages and lists of participants are not included. See http://www.who.int/emc for more information. © World Health Organization This document is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization (WHO), and all rights are reserved by the Organization. The document may, however, be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The views expressed in documents by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors. The mention of specific companies or specific manufacturers' products does no imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................... i PREFACE ..................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 1. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM ........................................................3 1.1 REVIEW OF EPIDEMICS SINCE THE 1970S .......................................................................................... 3 Geographical distribution
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Sepsis?
    What is sepsis? Sepsis is a serious medical condition resulting from an infection. As part of the body’s inflammatory response to fight infection, chemicals are released into the bloodstream. These chemicals can cause blood vessels to leak and clot, meaning organs like the kidneys, lung, and heart will not get enough oxygen. The blood clots can also decrease blood flow to the legs and arms leading to gangrene. There are three stages of sepsis: sepsis, severe sepsis, and ultimately septic shock. In the United States, there are more than one million cases with more than 258,000 deaths per year. More people die from sepsis each year than the combined deaths from prostate cancer, breast cancer, and HIV. More than 50 percent of people who develop the most severe form—septic shock—die. Septic shock is a life-threatening condition that happens when your blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level after an infection. Who is at risk? Anyone can get sepsis, but the elderly, infants, and people with weakened immune systems or chronic illnesses are most at risk. People in healthcare settings after surgery or with invasive central intravenous lines and urinary catheters are also at risk. Any type of infection can lead to sepsis, but sepsis is most often associated with pneumonia, abdominal infections, or kidney infections. What are signs and symptoms of sepsis? The initial symptoms of the first stage of sepsis are: A temperature greater than 101°F or less than 96.8°F A rapid heart rate faster than 90 beats per minute A rapid respiratory rate faster than 20 breaths per minute A change in mental status Additional symptoms may include: • Shivering, paleness, or shortness of breath • Confusion or difficulty waking up • Extreme pain (described as “worst pain ever”) Two or more of the symptoms suggest that someone is becoming septic and needs immediate medical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Validation of Lactate Clearance at 6 H for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Children
    570 Research Article Validation of lactate clearance at 6 h for mortality prediction in critically ill children Rajeev Kumar, Nirmal Kumar Background and Aims: To validate the lactate clearance (LC) at 6 h for mortality Access this article online prediction in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)-admitted patients and its comparison Website: www.ijccm.org with a pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM 2) score. Design: A prospective, observational DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.192040 study in a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: Children <13 years of age, Quick Response Code: Abstract admitted to PICU were included in the study. Lactate levels were measured at 0 and 6 h of admission for clearance. LC and delayed or nonclearance group compared for in-hospital mortality and compared with PIM 2 score for mortality prediction. Results: Of the 140 children (mean age 33.42 months) who were admitted to PICU, 23 (16.42%) patients died. For LC cut-off (16.435%) at 6 h, 92 patients qualified for clearance and 48 for delayed or non-LC group. High mortality was observed (39.6%) in delayed or non-LC group as compared to clearance group (4.3%) (P = 0.000). LC cut-off of 16.435% at 6 h (sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 75.2%, positive predictive value 39.6%, and negative predictive value 95.7%) correlates with mortality. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for LC at 6 h for mortality prediction was 0.823 (P = 0.000). The area under ROC curve for expected mortality prediction by PIM 2 score at admission was 0.906 and at 12.3% cut-off of PIM 2 Score was related with mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: a Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial)
    Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial) RESEARCH PROTOCOL dr. Saptadi Yuliarto, Sp.A(K), MKes PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY AND INTENSIVE THERAPY SAIFUL ANWAR GENERAL HOSPITAL, MALANG MEDICAL FACULTY OF BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY DECEMBER 30, 2020 1 SUMMARY Research Title Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound: A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS Trial) Research Design A multicentre experimental study in pediatric patients with a diagnosis of septic shock. Research Objective To examine the differences in fluid resuscitation outcomes for septic shock patients with the USSM and mACCM protocols • Patient mortality rate • Differences in clinical parameters • Differences in macrocirculation hemodynamic parameters • Differences in microcirculation laboratory parameters Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Inclusion: Pediatric patients (1 month - 18 years old), diagnosed with septic shock Exclusion: patients with congenital heart defects, already receiving fluid resuscitation or inotropic-vasoactive drugs prior to study recruitment, patients after cardiac surgery Research Setting A multicenter study conducted in all pediatric intensive care units (HCU / PICU), emergency department (IGD), and pediatric wards in participating hospitals in Indonesia. Sample Size Calculating the minimum sample size using the clinical trial formula for the mortality rate, obtained a sample size of 340 samples. Research Period The study was carried out in the period January 2021 to December 2022 Data Collection Process Pediatric patients who met the study inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups, namely the intervention group (USSM protocol) or the control group (mACCM protocol). Patients who respond well to resuscitation will have their outcome analyzed in the first hour (15-60 minutes). Patients with fluid refractory shock will have their output analyzed at 6 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningococcal Meningitis (Neisseria Meningitidis)
    Division of Disease Control What Do I Need To Know? Meningococcal Meningitis (Neisseria meningitidis) What is meningococcal meningitis ? Meningitis is a severe infection of the bloodstream and meninges (a thin lining covering the brain and spinal cord) caused by a bacteria or virus. Bacterial meningitis is usually more severe than viral meningitis but is less common. Bacterial meningitis is most commonly caused by Haemophilus influenzae type B, Streptococcus pneumoniae or Neisseria meningitidis. The most severe form of bacterial meningitis is called Neisseria meningitidis. It is a relatively rare disease and usually occurs as a single isolated event. Clusters of cases or outbreaks are rare in the United States. Who is at risk for meningococcal meningitis? Anyone can get meningococcal meningitis, but it is more common in infants and children. Other people at increased risk for meningitis are college freshmen living in dormitories, microbiologists who are routinely exposed, military recruits, and travelers to areas where meningitis occurs frequently, such as sub-Saharan Africa. What are the symptoms of meningococcal meningitis? Although most people exposed to the meningococcal bacteria do not become seriously ill, some may develop fever, headache, vomiting, stiff neck and a rash. Meningitis can cause sensitivity to light, confusion, drowsiness, seizures and sometimes coma. The disease is sometimes fatal. How soon do symptoms appear? The symptoms may appear one to 10 days after exposure, but usually less than four days. How is meningococcal meningitis spread? Meningococcal meningitis is spread by direct, close contact with nasal or throat discharges of an infected person. Many people carry meningococcal bacteria in their nose and throat without any signs of illness, while others may develop serious symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Shock.” These Podcasts Are Designed to Give Medical Students an Overview of Key Topics in Pediatrics
    PedsCases Podcast Scripts This is a text version of a podcast from Pedscases.com on “Approach to Shock.” These podcasts are designed to give medical students an overview of key topics in pediatrics. The audio versions are accessible on iTunes or at www.pedcases.com/podcasts. Approach to Shock Developed by Dr. Dustin Jacobson and Dr Suzanne Beno for PedsCases.com. December 20, 2016 My name is Dustin Jacobson, a 3rd year pediatrics resident from the University of Toronto. This podcast was supervised by Dr. Suzanne Beno, a staff physician in the division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine at the University of Toronto. Today, we’ll discuss an approach to shock in children. First, we’ll define shock and understand it’s pathophysiology. Next, we’ll examine the subclassifications of shock. Last, we’ll review some basic and more advanced treatment for shock But first, let’s start with a case. Jonny is a 6-year-old male who presents with lethargy that is preceded by 2 days of a diarrheal illness. He has not urinated over the previous 24 hours. On assessment, he is tachycardic and hypotensive. He is febrile at 40 degrees Celsius, and is moaning on assessment, but spontaneously breathing. We’ll revisit this case including evaluation and management near the end of this podcast. The term “shock” is essentially a ‘catch-all’ phrase that refers to a state of inadequate oxygen or nutrient delivery for tissue metabolic demand. This broad definition incorporates many causes that eventually lead to this end-stage state. Basic oxygen delivery is determined by cardiac output and content of oxygen in the blood.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Genomics of Neisseria Meningitidis Pathogenesis
    © 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com ARTICLES Functional genomics of Neisseria meningitidis pathogenesis YAO-HUI SUN1, SHARMILA BAKSHI1, RONALD CHALMERS2 & CHRISTOPH M. TANG1 1University Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom Correspondence to be addressed to C.M.T.; Email: [email protected] and R.C.; Email: [email protected] The pathogenic bacterium Neisseria meningitidis is an important containing unique signature tags (fig, 1b), in 96 separate trans- cause of septicemia and meningitis, especially in childhood1. The position reactions. The modified genomic DNA was repaired, establishment and maintenance of bacteremic infection is a pre- and returned to the host by transformation. We selected 30 mu- requisite for all the pathological sequelae of meningococcal in- tants from each reaction, resulting in a library of 2,880 mutants fection. To further understand the genetic basis of this essential (30 pools × 96). To determine whether Tn10 insertion occurs at step in pathogenesis, we analyzed a library of 2,850 insertional diverse sites, we assessed 40 transformants from a single trans- .com mutants of N. meningitidis for their capacity to cause systemic in- position reaction by Southern blot analysis. Each had a single, fection in an infant rat model. The library was constructed by in distinct Tn10 insertion (Fig. 1c). To establish whether Tn10 in- .nature vitro modification of Neisseria genomic DNA with the purified tegration was stable during systemic infection of infant rats, we components of Tn10 transposition2.
    [Show full text]