DOCSLIB.ORG

Delivering the Benefits of Cycling in Outer London*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delivering the Benefits of Cycling in Outer London* Delivering the benefits of cycling in Outer London* Putting cycling at the heart of local public than ever before to encourage people to get on service delivery their bikes and to make cycling a mainstream mode of transport and part of the local economy. This is an exciting time for cycling. It is at the heart of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS) and some London boroughs are already leading Outer London – the place to cycle the way by improving conditions for cycling and There is growing public enthusiasm for cycling in promoting its benefits. Outer London. More people are seeing the bike as a viable and attractive alternative to the car. In Outer London has a key role to play and is poised a recent survey, 58 per cent of Outer Londoners to reap the benefits of increased cycling. These said they are considering cycling more over the include less congestion, cleaner air, healthier coming year. communities, and the economic benefits of more people making local journeys by bike. Now is the time for Outer London boroughs to respond to this appetite for change and put This report is based on a programme of research cycling at the centre of local public service and aimed at those who set the priority for delivery – including transport, health, planning transport in local areas. By learning from and education. pioneering cycling innovations, and drawing on * A summary document of ‘Delivering the benefits of the greater flexibility in local funding available in cycling in Outer London’, a joint report by Transport for the new Local Implementation Plan (LIP) process, London, London Councils, London Cycling Campaign Outer London boroughs are in a better position and Sustrans MAYOR Transport OF LONDON for London Delivering the benefits of cycling in Outer London The potential for cycling in Outer London The map below shows the clusters of Why Promote Cycling in Outer London? There are many short trips that could easily be cycling potential across Outer London cycled as more than half of all car trips made in Green spaces, residential Helps reduce congestion Outer London are less than two miles in length roads and larger dwellings and create ‘liveable’ streets (only 10 minutes on a bike). There is real potential facillitate additional to reduce car use and congestion by encouraging cycle trips a shift to cycling. Creates more Analysis shows that more than half of the active communities Benefits of potentially cyclable trips in the Capital (ie those Outer London residents Outer London increased that can transfer from car or public transport) are want to cycle (58 per cent is ideal cycling in in Outer London. These total around 2.4 million say they want to cycle more) for cycling Outer London a day, most of which are made by car (see map, right, of cycling potential with highest density of Cuts emmissions and potential shown in red and blue). Cycling has the potential improves local air quality to replace many short car Numerous centres of high cycling potential exist journeys (50 per cent of in Outer London. With the right mix of promotional Outer London car journeys Boosts local journeys to interventions, a real shift in cycling culture could are less than 2 miles) town centres be delivered in these areas. Outside these urban centres, the cycling potential is less concentrated than in central and Inner London so promotional measures need to be adapted accordingly. For example, a focus on marketing and travel Benefits of cycling in Outer London Cycling – good value for money awareness campaigns, cycle training and travel planning. Cycling now features strongly in the policy agenda There are always a number of competing for London. It is represented in the MTS and transport priorities for boroughs to consider. reflected in the findings of the Outer London It is imperative that schemes are chosen which Barriers to Cycling in Outer London Commission, the draft London Plan and emerging demonstrate value for money, maximising the Economic Development Strategy. Cycling is return for every pound invested. The low costs Attitudinal barriers Physical barriers Barriers to delivery increasingly recognised as a key tool to help local and signficant benefits of cycling schemes authorities achieve their priorities, such as those mean that their benefit-cost ratio can be as Fear of traffic and feelings High traffic speeds Lack of political support determined by national indicators on improving air much as 20:1, far higher than some other types of vulnerability – not perceived as a quality and reducing childhood obesity. In of transport investment.* mainstream transport addition, cycling can deliver a wide range of solution benefits, these include: This is primarily due to the likely benefits in terms Convenience of the car Severance, eg major roads Perceived lack of funding • Improving quality of life and tackling of improvements to public health and health and lack of permeability health inequalities inequalities. If reduced pollution and carbon dioxide (CO ) emissions are added, the value for Individual not sure cycling Lack of cycle parking Lack of adequately trained • Delivering low cost accessibility 2 is for them or motivated staff • Strengthening local economies by boosting money and wide ranging benefits can make local journeys cycling schemes even more attractive. Cycling perceived to be incompatible • Addressing the climate change agenda, and with complicated lifestyles *Sustrans, 2005, Economic Appraisal of Local Walking and • Reducing congestion and creating Cycling Routes liveable streets If more residents take up cycling, there will be less need for car parking spaces, freeing up valuable land in Outer London. Delivering the benefits of cycling in Outer London What stands in the way of success? Cycling solutions across the Capital Borough developed best practice public Attitudinal barriers realm guidance, to ensure land use planning There are a number of reasons why people considers the needs of cyclists don’t cycle now in Outer London. These include Borough council working with mental health Physical barriers individual attitudinal barriers, physical barriers such charity to offer led rides to patients at London Borough of Hackney as traffic speeds, and issues faced when delivering surgeries – partnership working in action. Barriers to delivery cycling support. These are summarised in the adjacent diagram. London Borough of Tower Hamlets Children regularly cycling to school increased Using the right mix of measures and partnership Introduction of contraflow cycle lanes to from five per cent to 24 per cent (where working, each of these barriers can be overcome. improve permeability and open the area Sustrans Bike It programmes established) A number of Outer London boroughs have worked for cycling London Borough of Havering hard to overcome such obstacles, giving rise to the London Borough of Haringey following cycling success stories • The London Borough of Sutton increased cycling by 75 per cent during the three years of the Direct Support for Cycling programme has Smarter Travel Sutton programme provided cycle training and maintenance Enfield • In Richmond upon Thames and Kingston more courses to hundreds of children and parents than 10 per cent of residents cycle at least twice encouraging take up of cycling Barnet a week London Borough of Ealing Harrow Haringey ltham Forest These and other examples show the real potential Redbridge Islington Hackney Wa for increasing cycling in Outer London. Havering Brent Agewell community project helped older people Camden improve their health by organising regular Hillingdon Barking & The map, right, demonstrates a wide variety of We Dagenham Ken & Chelsea Newham confidence training sessions and rides stminster Tower cycling successes that have been delivered across Hammersmith Ealing & Fulham City Hamlets the Capital in both Inner and Outer London. Further (Community Cycling Fund for London support) details on these and many other examples are London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham Southwark available in the full report ‘Delivering the benefits Greenwich Lambet of cycling in Outer London’. Hounslow Bexley A 400 per cent increase in the number Wandsworth Richmond h The examples are colour coded according to the of girls cycling to school in participating Lewisham barriers identified in the previous diagram which areas (Cyclicious) have been successfully addressed. Merton London Borough of Hounslow Outer London – ready for a change Kingston Bromley The projects shown here have delivered real benefits Step Pedal Jump scheme launched to Sutton Croydon in their individual areas. Outer London boroughs are encourage members of sports and leisure well suited to having cycling at the core of their LIPs clubs to travel by bicycle – example of working strategy, for the following reasons: with leisure industry • Public transport is generally more infrequent and London Borough of Richmond upon Thames trips are dispersed, presenting the opportunity for cycling as an alternative for short trips Travel awareness campaigns including • Larger properties in Outer London make One in 10 users of Surbiton rail station car-free day road closures, working with An example of road safety and cycling storing a bike easier for many more people replaced the car for a bike (installation local press and advertising campaigns promotion working in partnership to • The network of quiet residential roads, open of improved cycle parking at the station) to promote cycling maximise funding opportunities spaces and parks are perfect for getting novice cyclists involved Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames London Borough of Lambeth London Borough of Bromley Delivering the benefits of cycling in Outer London Delivering the change Transport decision makers need to work with local Funding partners to secure their commitment in building A range of approaches are needed to tackle the The following diagram outlines how packages of measures can be drawn together to build an support for cycling. In particular the local Primary barriers to cycling, these include: integrated cycling strategy, to be delivered via the LIPs and other local funding mechanisms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Children's 76
    CHILDREN'S 76 this Committee agree to make provision in revenue estimates for continuing, on a proportionate basis, the financial aid at present being afforded by Middlesex County Council to the extent shown hereunder to the Voluntary Organisations respectively named, viz.: — £ The Middlesex Association for the Blind ... ... 150 approx. The Southern Regional Association for the Blind ... 49 approx. Middlesex and Surrey League for the Hard of Hearing ... 150 approx. 27. Appointment of Deputy Welfare Officer: RESOLVED: That the Com­ mittee note the appointment by the Establishment Committee (Appointments Sub-Committee) on 16th November, 1964, of Mr. Henry James Vagg to this post (Scales A/B). (The meeting dosed at 9.10 p.m.) c Chairman. CHILDREN'S COMMITTEE: 30th December, 1964. Present: Councillors Mrs. Nott Cock (in the Chair), Cohen, G. Da vies, Mrs. Edwards, Mrs. Haslam, Mrs. Rees, Rouse, Tackley and B. C. A. Turner. PART I.—RECOMMENDATIONS.—NIL. PART n.—MINUTES. 10. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 30th September, 1964, having been circulated, be taken as read and signed as a correct record. 11. Appointment of Children's Officer: RESOLVED: That the Committee re­ ceive the report of the Town Clerk that the London Borough of Harrow Appointments Sub-Committee on 16th November, 1964, appointed Miss C. L. J. S. Boag, at present Area Children's Officer Middlesex County Coun­ cil, to the post of Children's Officer in the Department of the Medical Officer of Health with effect from 1st April, 1965, at a salary in accordance with lettered Grades C/D.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government in London Had Always Been More Overtly Partisan Than in Other Parts of the Country but Now Things Became Much Worse
    Part 2 The evolution of London Local Government For more than two centuries the practicalities of making effective governance arrangements for London have challenged Government and Parliament because of both the scale of the metropolis and the distinctive character, history and interests of the communities that make up the capital city. From its origins in the middle ages, the City of London enjoyed effective local government arrangements based on the Lord Mayor and Corporation of London and the famous livery companies and guilds of London’s merchants. The essential problem was that these capable governance arrangements were limited to the boundaries of the City of London – the historic square mile. Outside the City, local government was based on the Justices of the Peace and local vestries, analogous to parish or church boundaries. While some of these vestries in what had become central London carried out extensive local authority functions, the framework was not capable of governing a large city facing huge transport, housing and social challenges. The City accounted for less than a sixth of the total population of London in 1801 and less than a twentieth in 1851. The Corporation of London was adamant that it neither wanted to widen its boundaries to include the growing communities created by London’s expansion nor allow itself to be subsumed into a London-wide local authority created by an Act of Parliament. This, in many respects, is the heart of London’s governance challenge. The metropolis is too big to be managed by one authority, and local communities are adamant that they want their own local government arrangements for their part of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Unit
    September 2019 Research Unit Briefing: Mapping the Mayor’s Strategies An analysis of the Mayor of London’s strategic policy and spending priorities 1 September 2019 Briefing: Mapping the Mayor’s Strategies About the London Assembly The London Assembly is part of the Greater London Authority (GLA). The Assembly is made up of 25 Members who are elected by Londoners at the same time as the Mayor. It is the job of the Assembly to hold the Mayor and Mayoral advisers to account by publicly examining policies, activities and decisions that affect Londoners. The London Assembly question the Mayor’s plans and actions directly at Mayor’s Question Time and our committees examine issues that matter to Londoners through public meetings and investigations. Jennette Arnold OBE Tony Arbour Gareth Bacon Shaun Bailey Sian Berry Labour Conservative Conservative Conservative Green Andrew Boff Leonie Cooper Tom Copley Unmesh Desai Tony Devenish Conservative Labour Labour Labour Conservative Andrew Dismore Len Duvall OBE Florence Eshalomi Nicky Gavron Susan Hall Labour Labour Labour Labour Conservative David Kurten Joanne McCartney Steve O’Connell Caroline Pidgeon MBE Keith Prince Brexit Alliance Labour Conservative Liberal Democrat Conservative Caroline Russell Dr Onkar Sahota Navin Shah Fiona Twycross Peter Whittle Green Labour Labour Labour Brexit Alliance 2 September 2019 Contents 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 Years On
    2 July 2010 A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Tony Travers and Christine Whitehead A brief history… It is 10 years since the Greater London Authority was created as a metropolitan or regional tier of government for London. There have been five different arrangements of ‘upper tier’ government in the capital since the Metropolitan Board of Works (MBW) was created in 1855 to build infrastructure. The MBW was succeeded by the London County Council (LCC), a powerful authority for the inner part of the contemporary city. Within this area 28 metropolitan boroughs and the City of London delivered ‘local’ services. Two factors were particularly important in influencing the progress of London’s government. First, the physical expansion of the city created demands for provision across a wider area than the City of London’s original and long-evolved ‘square mile’. The Metropolitan Police Service was created by the government in 1829 to meet the law and order requirements of a fast-growing city. The squalor and chaos of the London of the 1850s prompted Parliament to legislate for London’s first-ever metropolitan government, an indirectly-elected entity. Further physical expansion between the end of the 19 th century and 1939 generated a debate about the need for a ‘Greater London’ government 1. The second important factor in determining the kinds of institutions that emerged was the local power and parochialism of both the City of London and the parish-based or ad hoc bodies that developed to deliver services in the absence of a city-wide government.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultants Brief the Crystal Palace Area
    Consultants Brief The Crystal Palace Area - Regeneration and urban design study 1 1 Introduction Where is Crystal Palace? Well that depends on who you ask. To some people it is Crystal Palace Park, to others the Upper Norwood ‘triangle, then there is Anerley and Penge, are they part of Crystal Palace area? If you google Crystal Palace, Crystal Palace FC pops up first followed by the magnificent Crystal Palace building that burnt down in 1936. We would like to employ consultants to explore the uncertain identity of Crystal Palace and what the future might hold, with people living and working in the area, those who own land in the area, or provide services or represent the people living there. We are seeking to appoint a suitably experienced team to carry out a regeneration and urban design study that explores future opportunities for the Crystal Palace and its surrounding town centres in light of the potential new designation of Crystal Palace as an Strategic Outer London Development centre with a strategic function around leisure/ tourism/ arts/ culture/ sports and the emerging development proposals within the park boundary. The study should consider implications and opportunities for regeneration of the area, through a range of potential strategies and interventions, and be flexible enough to be relevant given a range of scenarios regarding the nature of the redevelopment of Crystal Palace Park and the facilities located there. A key requirement of the study is that it is informed by meaningful community dialogue. The timetable for this procurement and the subsequent delivery of the project is set out in the process section of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater London Employment Forum Annual General Meeting
    Greater London Employment Forum Annual General Meeting Thursday 11 February 2021 at 11.30am approx (or on the rising of the sides from the previous meeting) Virtual MS Teams Meeting Employers’ Side: Virtual MS Teams Meeting 10.45am Union Side: Virtual MS Teams Meeting 10.45am Contact Officer: Debbie Williams Telephone: 020 7934 9964 Email: [email protected] Agenda item 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR 2020-21 The positions of Chair and Vice-Chair should alternate between the two sides on an annual basis. This year it is the turn of the Trade Union Side. 4. CONFIRMATION OF GLEF MEMBERSHIP 2020-21 Attached 5. TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 20 FEBRUARY Attached 2020 AND TAKE ANY MATTERS ARISING 6. APPRENTICESHIPS UPDATE – Tim Gallagher, Principal Policy Officer, Attached London Councils to present this item 7. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND NHS COLLABORATIVE WORKING Attached 8. LONDON PENSIONS CIV UPDATE Attached 9. RESTRICTION ON PUBLIC SECTOR EXIT PAYMENTS - £95K CAP Attached 10. GMB DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARTER – Nell Andrew, GMB to talk/ present this item 11. ANY OTHER BUSINESS 12. DATE OF NEXT MEETING: Thursday 15 July 2021 (AGM) Group meetings: 10am Joint Meeting: 11.30am Helen Reynolds Steve Davies Union Side Co-Secretary Employers’ Secretary 1st Floor, Congress House, Great Russell Street, 59½ Southwark Street LONDON WC1B 3LS LONDON SE 1 OAL 1 Item 4 GREATER LONDON EMPLOYMENT FORUM MEMBERS 2020-21 Borough Rep Party Deputy Barking & Dagenham Sade Bright Lab Irma Freeborn Barnet Daniel Thomas Con D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of London's
    THE EVOLUTION OF LONDON’S BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS Report March 2016 Future of London is an independent not- Established 2001, Rocket Science is for-profit urban policy network focused an independent research, consultancy on the challenges facing regeneration, and grant-management practice fo- housing, infrastructure and economic cused on making a difference to the development practitioners in the Capi- lives of people and communities across tal. We are a borough-led membership the UK. We work with governments, organisation with a number of external business and the voluntary sector to partners, which provides top career de- design and evaluate services which velopment, expert-led policy research, best meet the needs of different cities and topical networking and speaker- and localities. led events. Future of London Rocket Science UK Ltd. 70 Cowcross Street 70 Cowcross Street London, EC1M 6EJ London, EC1M 6EJ futureoflondon.org.uk rocketsciencelab.co.uk @futureofldn @_RocketScience_ Future of London Rocket Science UK Ltd Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. BIDs IN LONDON 4 3. FUNDING POLICY CHALLENGES 9 4. LONDON BIDs SWOT ANALYSIS 11 5. IMPACT: PROJECTS AND SERVICES 13 6. CASE STUDY: VICTORIA BID 21 7. COLLABORATION AND PARTNERSHIP 23 8. CASE STUDY: SOUTH BANK BID 24 9. BID MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE 29 10. CASE STUDY: LOVE WIMBLEDON 34 11. SUPPORT FOR BIDs IN LONDON 36 12. CASE STUDY: ORPINGTON FIRST 40 13. RECOMMENDATIONS 41 14. CONCLUSIONS 42 15. APPENDIX 1: SCOPE 43 16. APPENDIX 2: DATA 44 17. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 47 © Future of London 2011 Ltd Future of London 2011 Ltd is a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document
    Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Adopted 26 February 2009 Planning and Housing Strategy Spelthorne Borough Council Council Offices Knowle Green Staines TW18 1XB Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2 Spatial Description of Spelthorne............................................................................ 3 3 Vision and Objectives............................................................................................... 9 4 Core Strategy and Policies....................................................................................... 13 5 The General Location of Development.................................................................... 19 Strategic Policy SP1: Location of Development................................................... 20 Policy LO1: Flooding.......................................................................................... 23 6 Housing Provision .................................................................................................... 25 Strategic Policy SP2: Housing Provision ............................................................. 27 Policy HO1: Providing for New Housing Development ....................................... 28 Policy HO2: Contingency for Meeting Housing Provision ................................... 29 Policy HO3: Affordable Housing......................................................................... 30 Policy HO4: Housing Size and Type .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 343 councils in England: • Metropolitan districts (36) • London boroughs (32) plus the City of London • Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly • County councils (26) • District councils (192) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croyd on 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by London Councils [FSS 014]
    Written evidence submitted by London Councils [FSS 014] Summary London Councils welcomes the inquiry. Our submission highlights the following key points: London boroughs were under significant financial pressure even before the coronavirus outbreak due to a decade of funding reductions, increased demand, and underfunded new duties. A number of other structural funding issues have increased the financial pressures on London boroughs and hampered their ability to plan their finances sustainably, including: a short-term approach to funding by Government; delays to reform of the finance system; and the potential impact of DSG deficits on general fund budgets. Covid-19 has intensified the financial pressure: Even after c.£1.6 billion in pandemic funding from central government, London boroughs forecast a potential shortfall of £700 million in 2020-21. While commercial property investment has increased in recent years, spending has been concentrated in a minority of authorities and is not having a distortionary effect on overall property market activity, and investments are subject to significant internal and external scrutiny. There are a number of measures the Government can undertake to support the financial sustainability of the sector over the short-, medium- and long-term, including: o most immediately, by making good on the promise to fully support local government through the pandemic; o in the medium term, providing certainty by delivering a multi-year Spending Review that provides sufficient resources to stabilise the sector, acknowledges the underlying structural funding pressures, and new demand pressures being put on local government as a result of the pandemic; and o in the longer term, use the key events in the next year (the fundamental review of business rates, CSR, Devolution White Paper, reforms to Adult Social Care, and the Fair Funding Review) to reform local government finance by including access to a broader range of revenue raising powers and flexibilities, so the sector is not overly reliant on one particular tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the London Boroughs 5Years
    YEARS 5OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS TONY TRAVERS LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS & POLITICAL SCIENCE GUILDHALL, LONDON 50 YEARS OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS Tony Travers, London School of Economics & Political Science London Councils represents London’s This lecture relies heavily on the work of other 32 borough councils and the City of London. It is a cross-party people.The bibliography at the end of the organisation that works on behalf paper lists many of the excellent books I have of all of its member authorities relied upon to bring together the development regardless of political persuasion and history of the London boroughs. I would London Communications Agency particularly like to acknowledge the help over is an award winning public relations many years of my colleague Professor George and public affairs consultancy focussed on London and London Jones. The story of London’s government is issues. We are passionate about strangely gripping. It has attracted researchers the politics of London and use our and commentators over many years. I have also detailed research, knowledge and understanding to support our been enormously assisted by a number of officials clients in delivering change in at London Councils, including John O’Brien, our great city. Dick Sorabji, James Odling-Smee, Souraya This lecture has been typeset using Ali, Dan Drillsma-Milgrom, Sarah Fudge, Ian the Clarendon font. Clarendon, was Mitchell, Barbara Salmon and Emma Stewart. created in 1845 by the typographer Robert Beasley who went on to become the Sheriff of the City of My thanks also go to the City of London London in 1863 and the Lord Mayor Corporation and London Communications of London in 1869.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Political
    CONSTITUENCY MP (PARTY) MAJORITY Barking Margaret Hodge (Lab) 15,272 Battersea Jane Ellison (Con) 7,938 LONDON’S Beckenham Bob Stewart (Con) 18,471 Bermondsey & Old Southwark Neil Coyle (Lab) 4,489 Bethnal Green & Bow Rushanara Ali (Lab) 24,317 Bexleyheath & Crayford David Evennett (Con) 9,192 POLITICAL Brent Central Dawn Butler (Lab) 19,649 Brent North Barry Gardiner (Lab) 10,834 Brentford & Isleworth Ruth Cadbury (Lab) 465 Bromley & Chislehurst Bob Neill (Con) 13,564 MAP Camberwell & Peckham Harriet Harman (Lab) 25,824 Carshalton & Wallington Tom Brake (LD) 1,510 Chelsea & Fulham Greg Hands (Con) 16,022 This map shows the political control Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan Smith (Con) 8,386 of the capital’s 73 parliamentary Chipping Barnet Theresa Villiers (Con) 7,656 constituencies following the 2015 Cities of London & Westminster Mark Field (Con) 9,671 General Election. On the other side is Croydon Central Gavin Barwell (Con) 165 Croydon North Steve Reed (Lab [Co-op]) 21,364 a map of the 33 London boroughs and Croydon South Chris Philp (Con) 17,410 details of the Mayor of London and Dagenham & Rainham Jon Cruddas (Lab) 4,980 London Assembly Members. Dulwich & West Norwood Helen Hayes (Lab) 16,122 Ealing Central & Acton Rupa Huq (Lab) 274 Ealing North Stephen Pound (Lab) 12,326 Ealing, Southall Virendra Sharma (Lab) 18,760 East Ham Stephen Timms (Lab) 34,252 Edmonton Kate Osamor (Lab [Co-op]) 15,419 Eltham Clive Efford (Lab) 2,693 Enfield North Joan Ryan (Lab) 1,086 Enfield, Southgate David Burrowes (Con) 4,753 Erith & Thamesmead
    [Show full text]