Smokestacks on Rails

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Smokestacks on Rails Smokestacks on Rails GETTING CLEAN AIR SOLUTIONS FOR LOCOMOTIVES ON TRACK Smokestacks on Rails GETTING CLEAN AIR SOLUTIONS FOR LOCOMOTIVES ON TRACK AUTHORS Janea Scott Hilary Sinnamon Acknowledgments We would like to thank technical consultant Sandra Goodman, from E3 Ven- tures, for her detailed analysis of the health benefits of various locomotive pollu- tion control scenarios. We deeply appreciate the contributions and insight provided by Jana Milford, Vickie Patton, and Nancy Spencer. We very much appreciate the help of Sarah Barbrow, Emily Churg and Jordan Diamond for completing quickly and successfully numerous tasks involved in writing and pro- ducing the report. And last, but certainly not least, we extend our sincere appreci- ation to the many people who lent their knowledge, ideas, wisdom and experience to reviewing several iterations of this report. Environmental Defense does not endorse any particular air pollution control technology or method. This report factually describes air pollution control tech- nologies and methods based on published reports. Our mission Environmental Defense is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win last- ing political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost- effective and fair. ©2006 Environmental Defense 100% recycled (100% post-consumer) totally chlorine free paper The complete report is available online at www.environmentaldefense.org. Contents Executive summary iv Introduction 1 Chapter 1: All aboard—trains carry freight and people across the 3 United States Chapter 2: Smokestacks on rails—locomotives’ impact on public health 7 and the environment Chapter 3: Federal delays in strengthening standards impose a heavy 11 burden on human health Chapter 4: Locomotives impose a heavy pollution burden on urban and 14 rural areas across the nation Chapter 5: Technology is on hand to curb locomotive emissions today 19 Chapter 6: “I think I can, I think I can”—successful emissions reduction 23 programs Chapter 7: National clean air solutions for locomotives 28 Appendix A: Methodology for estimating health benefits of locomotive 30 emission reductions Glossary 33 Notes 35 iii Executive summary Trains play a vital role in American com- In 2004, the U.S. Environmental merce. Every year, they move billions of Protection Agency (EPA) repeatedly tons of freight and millions of people committed to strengthen federal clean throughout the nation. However, they air standards for locomotives. Indeed, also deliver pollution, contributing sig- EPA publicly announced plans to issue nificantly to air quality problems across proposed national emission standards in the country. Many of today’s locomotives 2005 and to finalize those standards by are powered by high-polluting diesel mid-2006. But EPA has failed to act. engines. Diesel exhaust is made up of: This report documents the serious health impacts associated with each year •particulate matter (PM),implicated in of delay in federal action to clean up a host of respiratory problems and tens these smokestacks on rails. of thousands of premature deaths every year; •smog-forming oxides of nitrogen (NOx); Diesel locomotive emissions pollute our air and harm public •sulfur dioxide (SO2), which forms harmful particulate pollution and falls health back to earth as acid rain; The use of these dirty diesel locomotive engines to transport freight has risen •a noxious brew of toxic chemicals that dramatically in the past 35 years from together pose a cancer risk greater than nearly 800 million ton-miles in 1970 to that of any other air pollutant; and more than 1.6 billion ton-miles in 2004 •greenhouse gases that contribute to (see Figure 1), and is projected to global warming. continue at a brisk pace. In fact, the FIGURE 1 U.S. freight rail in ton-miles 1970–2004 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Ton-miles (millions) Ton-miles 600 400 200 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2004 Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Table 1-46a: U.S. Ton-Miles of Freight. http://www.bts.gov/publications/ national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_46a.html. iv TABLE 1 Smog-forming emissions from locomotives in six major cities and comparable number of today’s new automobilesa Locomotive NOx emissions Equivalent number Urban area (tons/year) of automobilesb Los Angelesc 12,000 13,000,000 Dallas-Fort Worth 4,500 4,900,000 Houston-Galveston 6,500 7,000,000 Chicago 23,000 25,000,000 Detroit 2,100 2,300,000 Baltimore 2,600 2,800,000 a Emissions data for Houston and Dallas is from 2002. Emissions data from the other cities is from 2003. b Calculations based on Tier 2 NOx emissions standard (0.07gNOx/mile) for highway vehicles and 12,000 vehicle miles/ year. Bureau of Automotive Repair, Engineering and Research Branch, State of California, “Methodology for Calcu- lating Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)”, September 30, 2000, Report 2000-06, available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ regs/im/vmt.pdf c Emissions data is for the South Coast Air Quality Management District amount of freight carried by rail is motive engines in six major U.S. cities EPA estimates expected to increase by another 50% by hard hit by ground-level ozone. The that locomotives 2030. Currently, locomotives move extensive locomotive NOx pollution about 42% of our nation’s freight as levels in these communities are com- will release measured in ton-miles. pared with automobiles, based on the 930,000 tons of As a result, these diesel engines smog limits in effect for today’s new smog-forming contribute significantly to national motor vehicles. air pollution. EPA estimates that in Using EPA’s methodology, Envi- NOx this year, 2006 locomotives will emit 930,000 ronmental Defense estimates that the comparable to tons of ozone-forming oxides of 2006 particulate and NOx emissions 120 coal-fired nitrogen (NOx)—as much as 120 coal- from locomotives will be associated fired power plants. Locomotives are with more than 3,000 premature deaths power plants. also responsible for more than 32,000 this year (Table 2).2 Exposure to this tons of particulate pollution; these pollution may also contribute to, among particles, which can be inhaled deep other health effects, more than 4,000 into the lungs, are probable carcino- non-fatal heart attacks, approximately gens. The particulate pollution from 61,000 cases of acute bronchitis and locomotives is comparable to the exacerbated asthma in children, and emissions from more than 70 coal-fired nearly 290,000 lost workdays. The power plants.1 economic impact of these adverse Table 1 takes a closer look at the health effects will total over $23 billion smog-forming pollution from loco- this year. TABLE 2 Adverse health effects associated with 2006 locomotive pollution Premature deaths 3,400 Non-fatal heart attacks 4,400 Acute bronchitis and asthma exacerbations in children 61,000 Lost work days 290,000 Total economic impact of adverse health effects $23.2 billion v Each year of EPA delay has By comparison, Table 3 also shows that serious health effects considerably lower health protections EPA has found that locomotive diesel are realized from slower and less pro- engines can be designed to use the same tective federal standards. For example, high-efficiency exhaust emission con- standards to limit locomotive pollution trols now being developed for large from new engines by 50% beginning in highway and nonroad diesel engines. 2013 would, upon advanced implementa- These technologies will allow loco- tion in 2030, allow an estimated 900 motive engines to reduce NOx and more deaths, 1,200 more non-fatal heart particulate matter emissions by 90%. attacks, 16,000 more cases of bronchitis In 2004, when EPA publicly announced and asthma exacerbations, and about Delays in EPA a new initiative to strengthen pollution 75,000 lost work days over rigorous action or weak controls for locomotives, EPA also indi- standards that take effect in 2011. They cated new clean air standards could be would forego some $6 billion in health standards will implemented beginning in 2011. benefits annually. In short, our analysis impose a heavy Table 3 shows the estimated health demonstrates that delays in EPA action burden on benefits in the year 2030 associated with or weak standards will impose a heavy implementing new locomotive emission burden on human health. human health. standards that are 90%, 75% or 50% more protective than today’s tightest standard (Tier 2).3 Our analysis indi- Clean air solutions are on track cates a 90% reduction implemented today in a 2011 compliance schedule would States and localities across the United annually prevent over 2,000 premature States are working to meet national deaths, approximately 2,600 non-fatal health-based air quality standards for heart attacks, 36,000 bronchitis and ozone and particulates—a problem to asthma exacerbations, and nearly which locomotive pollution is a major con- 170,000 lost work days and would tributor. And science points overwhelm- realize more than $13 billion in health ingly to the need for more protective benefits by 2030.4 national standards for particulates and TABLE 3 Projected health benefits in 2030 with stricter NOx and PM2.5 locomotive emissions standards Children’s Percentage bronchitis cleaner than Year new Annual Non-fatal Respiratory and asthma current standards health benefits Premature heart attacks hospital visits exacerbations Work loss days Tier 2 would in billions deaths avoided avoided avoided avoided avoided standards take effect of dollars annually annually annually annually annually 90% 2011 13.7 2,000 2,600 870 36,000 170,000 2013 12.5 1,800 2,400 800 33,000 150,000 2015 11.3 1,700 2,100 720 30,000 140,000 75% 2011 11.7 1,700 2,200 750 31,000 140,000 2013 10.7 1,600 2,000 680 28,000 130,000 2015 9.7 1,400 1,800 620 25,000 120,000 50% 2011 8.3 1,200 1,600 530 22,000 100,000 2013 7.7 1,100 1,400 490 20,000 95,000 2015 7.0 1,000 1,300 450 18,000 87,000 vi ozone and the imperative for greater dozen hybrid-diesel Green Goat trains progress in communities across the have been deployed.
Recommended publications
  • Equipment Roster
    Location 3400 NE Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73111 (405) 424-8222 Conveniently located just a half mile west of Interstate 35 off Exit 131 (NE 36th Street), on historic Grand Boulevard. - Half-mile east of Martin Luther King Boulevard - Just south of Lincoln Park Golf Course - 1 mile south of the Oklahoma City Zoo Oklahoma Railway Museum 3400 NE Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73111 (405) 424-8222 www.oklahomarailwaymuseum.org EQUIPMENT ROSTER 40 1 Oklahoma Railway Museum The Oklahoma Railway Museum, Ltd. Bridge Logos (ORM) offers 35-minute excursion trains on the first and third Saturdays of each month for the public from 10 am until 4 pm starting the first Saturday in April. The trains leave the historic Oakwood Depot at 9:15, 11:15, 1:15 and 3:15 The Museum itself is open Thursday - Saturday from 9 am to 4 pm and there is no admission charge to tour the grounds. Train rides are free for children under the age of 3, $5 for children 3 years to 12 years, and These Frisco and Rock Island Railroad $12 for those 13 years and older. In heralds were displayed for almost 80 years addition to the train ride, railroad (1931-2010) on Oklahoma City’s South equipment, including motor cars, Robinson Street Bridge. The bridge was locomotives and passenger cars, are on located approximately a half mile east of display. A display car contains permanent Union Station and allowed both railroads to exhibits of railroad memorabilia. pass above Robinson to access to the station. The bridge was torn down to make Oakwood Station way for a new bridge with the rerouting of the I-40 crosstown expressway.
    [Show full text]
  • General Motor Diesel Locomotive
    (Govt. of India) (Ministry of Railways) INTRODUCTION HAND BOOK ON GENERAL MOTOR DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE (For official use only) IRCAMTECH/2006/M/D/GM loco/1.0 FEBRUARY-2006 Centre for Advanced Maintenance TECHnology Excellence in Maintenance MAHARAJPUR, GWALIOR – 474020 INTRODUCTION HAND BOOK ON GENERAL MOTOR DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE i PREFACE The GM Locomotives have been included in the Diesel Locomotive fleet of Indian railway. Production of GM locomotive has already started in DLW, Varanasi. The 4000 HP, computer controlled GM locomotive has a large number of special and improved features vis-a-vis the Alco design diesel locomotive presently running in Indian railway. All those in the field of diesel locomotive need to get acquainted with the GM locomotive. This book “Introduction hand book on GM locomotive” prepared by the CAMTECH has been prepared with the purpose of disseminating the introductory information to all those in diesel loco maintenance field. The suggestions are invited from the readers to improve and make the book more useful. Any such suggestion shell be included in next publication. Date: - 28.02.2006 KUNDAN KUMAR Director (Mech) ii CONTENTS S No. Description Page No. 1. Preface i 2. Contents ii 3. Book details iii 4. Correction slips iv 5. Introduction of the GM Locomotive 1 to 2 6. General information data 3 to6 7. Various parts and its location 7 to 21 8. Fuel Oil System 22 to 25 9. Cooling Water System 26 to 30 10. Lube Oil System 31 to 37 11. Air Intake System 38 to 41 12. Compressed air system 42 to 43 13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility
    The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD Nick Little Shanelle Foster, PhD Raphael Isaac, PhD Orwell Madovi Darren Tascillo Center for Railway Research and Education Michigan State University Henry Center for Executive Development 3535 Forest Road, Lansing, MI 48910 NCDOT Project 2019-43 FHWA/NC/2019-43 October 2020 -i- FEASIBILITY REPORT The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility October 2020 Prepared by Center for Railway Research and Education Eli Broad College of Business Michigan State University 3535 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 USA Prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation – Rail Division 860 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27603 -ii- Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/NC/2019-43 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility October 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2384-4463 Nick Little Shanelle N. Foster, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-5500 Raphael Isaac, PhD Orwell Madovi Darren M. Tascillo 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Railway Research and Education 11. Contract or Grant No. Michigan State University Henry Center for Executive Development 3535 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report Research and Development Unit 104 Fayetteville Street December 2018 – October 2020 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 14. Sponsoring Agency Code RP2019-43 Supplementary Notes: 16.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BC RAIL STORY Part VI
    Revised 10/30/08 www.canadianrailwayobservations.com CANADIAN NATIONAL CN Locomotives retired since last issue: (Previous retirement August 25th) CN SD50F 5453 on October 4th CN SD50F 5415 on October 10th The first BC RAIL unit has been repainted into the latest CN livery. Ex-BC RAIL DASH 8- 40CM(u) 4615 which was purchased new from GE in 1990 has been at CADRAIL-Lachine for several months and included in the work to be done was an upgrade, and a complete CN repaint with BCOL sub-lettering under the cab number. She was moved from CADRAIL in Lachine to CN’s Pte-St. Charles Yard for testing, and In a light power move N SBK05 17 departed CN’s Pte-St. Charles Oct 17th with CN 4774 and BCOL 4615 and hours later arrived at CN-Taschereau Yard. Freshly painted CN (BCOL) 4615 was ready to head out the next day, and arrived in Toronto-Mac Yard on October 18th (Dave Parker photo), and on October 22nd she was a trailing unit on Westbound CN Train #853 at Dauphin, MB. http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_BCR_4615_Toronto_ON_Oct_18_08_Dave_Parker http://www.myrailfan.com/collection/CN/BCOL_4615/BCOL_4615_CAD_1.jpg (Jan.2008, before new paint) CN has ordered another 25 SD70M-2’s which are to be numbered from 8850 to 8874. These will be similar in appearance to the previous order, but will have a few internal improvements. The CN’s 8800-series are equipped with an Automatic Start when the pressure is down to 105 lbs, and these locomotives start up with an “air starter” (which is similar to the MLW-built M630’s).
    [Show full text]
  • Unit M 6-Transmission in Diesel Locomotive
    UNIT M 6-TRANSMISSION IN DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE OBJECTIVE The objective of this unit is to make you understand about • the need for transmission in a diesel engine • the duties of an ideal transmission • the requirements of traction • the relation between HP and Tractive Effort • the factors related to transmission efficiency • various modes of transmission and their working principle • the application of hydraulic transmission in diesel locomotive STRUCTURE 1. Introduction 2. Duties of an ideal transmission 3. Engine HP and Locomotive Tractive Effort 4. Factors related to efficiency 5. Rail and wheel adhesion 6. Types of transmission system 7. Principles of Mechanical Transmission 8. Principles of Hydrodynamic Transmission 9. Application of Hydrodynamic Transmission ( Voith Transmission ) 10. Principles of Electrical Transmission 11. Summary 12. Self assessment 1 1. INTRODUCTION A diesel locomotive must fulfill the following essential requirements- 1. It should be able to start a heavy load and hence should exert a very high starting torque at the axles. 2. It should be able to cover a very wide speed range. 3. It should be able to run in either direction with ease. Further, the diesel engine has the following drawbacks: • It cannot start on its own. • To start the engine, it has to be cranked at a particular speed, known as a starting speed. • Once the engine is started, it cannot be kept running below a certain speed known as the lower critical speed (normally 35-40% of the rated speed). Low critical speed means that speed at which the engine can keep itself running along with its auxiliaries and accessories without smoke and vibrations.
    [Show full text]
  • CRO 0209.Pdf
    www.canadianrailwayobservations.com Updated 04/02/2009 CANADIAN NATIONAL CN Locomotives retired since last issue: (Previous retirement October 30th) GTW GP9r 4635 on January 28th (*Sold to MNNR January 19th … see below) On January 2nd 2009, Walter Pfefferle caught GODERICH-EXETER (GEXR) GP40 4019 pulling out of the EMCC plant in London, Ontario with these fully painted and brand new CN SD70M-2’s: 8852, 8854, 8856 and 8858. As well CN 8850-8867 were released in early January 2009. http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/GEXR_4019_EMD_London_Ont_1_2_09 (GEXR GP40) http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_8854_London_1_2_09 3/4 http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_8858_London_1_2_09 3/4 http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_8856_London_1_2_09 3/4 http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_8852_London_1_2_09 3/4 http://railfan.thegrebs.com/CN/CN_8852a_London_1_2_08 Rear shot. New CN Power: The following new SD70M-2 sightings came from several CRO readers this month: On January 14th, CN Intermodal 194 (which is a very lucrative UPS contracted train and operates between Chicago-Memphis-Jackson-New Orleans), departed Markham with brand new CN 8853, CN 5513, CN 9543, 150 cars, 7141 tons and 9845-feet of train. On January 13th at Chappel Jct, (near Saskatoon, SK), CN 104 had CN 8865 leading. On January 13th, CN 198 had CN 8855-2643 for power at Chappel Jct. January 11th, CN train Q120 with 2525-5698 and new CN SD70M-2 8863 with 9823-feet of train at 8767 tons enroute to Halifax, NS and arrived on the 12th. While on the Montmagny Subdivision, SD70M-2 8863 reportedly had a minor mechanical issue that was resolved while in transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2015 Joint Rail Conference JRC2015 March23-26, 2015, San Jose, CA, USA
    Proceedings of the 2015 Joint Rail Conference JRC2015 March23-26, 2015, San Jose, CA, USA DRAFT JRC2015-5621 STUDY ON IMPROVING RAIL ENERGY EFFICIENCY (E2): BEST PRACTICES AND STRATEGIES Dr. Aviva Brecher Melissa Shurland USDOT USDOT Volpe National Transportation Center Federal Railroad Administration Energy Analysis and Sustainability Washington, DC, USA Cambridge, MA, USA ABSTRACT development test and evaluation (RDT&E)on advanced A recent Volpe Center report [1] for the Federal equipment (electric and hybrid, or dual fuel locomotives), or Railroad Administration’s (FRA) Rail Energy, Environment, alternative fuels (biodiesel, CNG/LNG, Fuel cells/Hydrogen); and Engine (E3) Technology research and development participation in international rail organizations (UIC) and trade program reviewed rail industry best practices (BPs) and associations (AAR, AREMA, APTA, AASHTO), and strategies for improving energy efficiency (E2) and partnering with regional and State environmental protection environmental sustainability. The review included examples of agencies for cross-enterprise E2 and sustainability and opportunities for adoption of international transferrable improvements. BPs, and US technologies for equipment, operations and logistics software tools that have measurably improved E2 INTRODUCTION performance for passenger and freight railroads. Drivers providing renewed impetus for rail industry E2 advances Although the primary FRA mission is to preserve, include environmental compliance requirements with US enforce, and enhance rail safety,
    [Show full text]
  • “Doukhobor” Switchers “Doukhobor” Switchers T
    “Doukhobor” Switchers Canadian Pacific's V1 Class 0-8-0 by Jeff Pinchbeck hroughout the Canadian Pacific system, switching The V1 class was rebuilt from two orders of locomotives locomotives worked day in and day out without attracting manufactured in 1898 by Baldwin Locomotive Works, Tthe sort of attention that some of their main line sisters Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and American Locomotive received. The U3 class of six-coupled locomotives was the most Company at its Richmond, Virginia plant. True to design common of the CP switchers and perhaps the first that comes practices of the day, the locomotives were built compounded1, to mind. Almost 200 of these locomotives were built and non-superheated2 and deckless3. The Richmond order comprised distributed throughout the CP system: U3a engines, numbered of Pittsburg4 compound locomotives with “D” slide valves and 6101-6130; 3 U3b engines, 6140-6142; 66 U3c engines, 6143- Belpaire fireboxes. This feature was not commonly seen on CP 6208, 51 U3d engines, 6209-6259 and 45 U3e engines, 6260- locomotives. The Baldwin order were Vauclain5 compounds 6304; total 195 engines. The later U3d/e classes were modern, with piston valves, another feature not common on CP. When these efficient, sure-footed locomotives that were capable of working locomotives were delivered, they were designated S.E. 2 class. in almost any track conditions. But even as those classes were on a drawing board, the CP was converting other locomotives The S.E. 2 class locomotives were originally assigned in the to help handle the switching needs created by the ever-expanding mountains to serve as pushers on the “Big Hill” and other grain harvest.
    [Show full text]
  • Diesel Locomotive Operation Manual for Quantum Sound™ Analog & DCC Manual Version 4.1 for Quantum Software Version 7
    Diesel Locomotive Operation Manual for Quantum Sound™ Analog & DCC Manual Version 4.1 For Quantum Software Version 7 This product not recommended for children under 14 years of age. Table of Contents BASIC ANALOG OPERATION......................................................................................................2 ADVANCED ANALOG FEATURES...............................................................................................3 ANALOG PROGRAMMING...........................................................................................................7 DCC OPERATION........................................................................................................................10 DCC PROGRAMMING.................................................................................................................17 QUANTUM SYSTEM SOUNDS...................................................................................................19 SPECIAL OPERATION AND TROUBLESHOOTING..................................................................21 Basic Analog Operation QSI recommends that you get used to operating and having fun with your new sound-equipped locomotive before exploring its more advanced features or programming options. Read through this section and be up and running with your new Quantum equipped locomotive in less than five minutes. Running the Locomotive Use an HO power pack with a standard direction switch. Set the switch to run your locomotive forward. Turn the throttle up slowly until you hear the Quantum System™
    [Show full text]
  • Specification of Tread Brake Unit (Tbu) for Hhp Locomotives R.D.S.O
    R.D.S.O Hkkjr ljdkj] jsy eU=zky; GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS SPECIFICATION OF TREAD BRAKE UNIT (TBU) FOR HHP LOCOMOTIVES SPECIFICATION NO. MP- 0.4900.22 (Revision - 00) January 2014 vuqla/kku vfHkdYi vkSj ekud laxBu y[kuÅ&226 011 RESEARCH DESIGNS & STANDARDS ORGANISATION LUCKNOW - 226 011 CONTENTS Description Page 1. General 1 2. Scope 1 3. Deviation(s) 1 4. Drawings 1 5. Definitions 2 6. Credentials of Supplier 2 7. Technical and Other General Data 2 8. Technical Requirements 4 9. Inspection and Testing 5 10. Documentation 6 11. Marking 6 12. Guarantee / Defect Liability 7 13. Spares 7 Specification of Tread Brake Unit (TBU) for HHP Locomotives SPECIFICATION OF TREAD BRAKE UNIT (TBU) FOR HHP LOCOMOTIVES 1. GENERAL It is proposed to provide Tread Brake Units (TBU) with and without parking brakes instead of conventional brake rigging on HHP locomotive bogie. These units being compact in design shall offer the following advantages: .1 Easy installation and lighter in weight. .2 Compact in construction resulting in significant space saving. .3 Less frequent maintenance requirement due to the absence of brake linkages. .4 Modular construction, unit exchange methodology can be adopted. .5 Built in automatic slack adjuster to maintain the proper gap between brake block and wheel. .6 Better efficiency of braking due to better utilisation of braking force. .7 No requirement of mechanical hand brake, as spring loaded parking brake shall be the integral feature of the TBU. .8 Parking brake operation by driver through solenoid valve shall make parking brake operation smooth. The status of parking brake application can be made visible to driver at driver cab.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Strategies for Improving Rail Energy Efficiency
    U.S. Department of Transportation Best Practices and Strategies for Federal Railroad Improving Rail Energy Efficiency Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-14/02 Final Report January 2014 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratford Drawings and Microfilm Lists.Xlsx
    Stratford Photo Tracings and Liquid Fuel Photo Tracings Drawings Lists Description: There are approximately 16000 engineering drawings covering locomotives, carriages and wagons, components, road vehicles and a miscellaneous variety of objects. There is an associated and quite unique card index system related to the drawings and a set of registers. System of arrangement: The engineering drawings have been sorted and listed in separate series based on the apparent practice of the drawing office at Stratford. The main series of the drawings can be categorised into four main types: 1. Photo tracings on wax linen. These acted as a master from which copies could be made for other purposes. 2. Office copies. These were prints on paper, with the earliest using a cyanotype photo process for copying, sometime additionally coloured, and kept in the drawing office. 3. Shop copies. These were on a variety of materials tacked onto wooden rods and used in the workshops. They have survived in this condition and are inevitably uniformly dirty and frequently in poor condition. 4. Bench-hole copies. These were separate from the main series, as only about 20% originated at Stratford. Most came from external sources. Essentially they formed a technical reference library of ideas and suggestions. They were folded and stored flat in a pigeonhole system. In total they comprise approximately 16000 drawings. There is duplication between the various series but the extent of this has not yet been appraised. The main series of drawings runs potentially from 1 to 42459, plus ‘attachments’ and ‘parts’ drawings. Most of these drawings have not survived into the present, as a result of periodic culls of material.
    [Show full text]