DOCSLIB.ORG

The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD Nick Little Shanelle Foster, PhD Raphael Isaac, PhD Orwell Madovi Darren Tascillo Center for Railway Research and Education Michigan State University Henry Center for Executive Development 3535 Forest Road, Lansing, MI 48910 NCDOT Project 2019-43 FHWA/NC/2019-43 October 2020 -i- FEASIBILITY REPORT The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility October 2020 Prepared by Center for Railway Research and Education Eli Broad College of Business Michigan State University 3535 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 USA Prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation – Rail Division 860 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27603 -ii- Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/NC/2019-43 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility October 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2384-4463 Nick Little Shanelle N. Foster, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-5500 Raphael Isaac, PhD Orwell Madovi Darren M. Tascillo 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Railway Research and Education 11. Contract or Grant No. Michigan State University Henry Center for Executive Development 3535 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report Research and Development Unit 104 Fayetteville Street December 2018 – October 2020 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 14. Sponsoring Agency Code RP2019-43 Supplementary Notes: 16. Abstract The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Rail Division (NCDOT) is responsible for the Piedmont passenger train that connects Raleigh and Charlotte. The benchmark locomotive-hauled trains comprise a diesel-electric locomotive, intermediate passenger cars, and a cab control unit. Diesel combustion results in exhaust containing air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. The Rail Division desires to reduce emissions. Battery and hydrogen fuel cell technologies applied to railways offer the opportunity to eliminate harmful exhaust emissions with potential for a low- or zero-emission energy supply chain. Technical feasibility of diesel, hydrogen and hybrid options with batteries for the Piedmont service were assessed. Modeling of various train and powertrain configurations was conducted, and energy and emission impacts estimated on a well-to-wheel basis. Single train simulation was utilized for feasibility assessment of powertrains while GREET was employed to estimate well-to-wheel emissions and energy. 25 train configurations and powertrain options were modelled, and nine hydrogen supply options were evaluated in addition to the diesel and electricity supply. Results show that diesel and hydrogen hybrid options as well as a hydrogen only option would be feasible for the Piedmont and that a low- or zero-carbon hydrogen supply chain could likely be possible. Energy reduction from operations ranged from 14% for a two locomotive diesel and battery option to 48% for a single locomotive fuel cell hybrid plugin powertrain. Hydrogen production from electrolysis where electricity is provided from renewables offers the highest well-to-wheel (WTW) energy savings without emissions in the supply chain if produced at the refueling site. Hydrogen delivery from a central location with the same method results in a small amount of emissions. Electrolysis with electricity from the SERC grid would result in energy and emission increases for some criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions on a WTW basis compared to the diesel-electric. Production from natural gas or biomass would reduce emissions and energy consumption. Based on the results of this study, energy and emission reductions could be achieved with a diesel hybrid configuration. Significant further WTW reductions could be realized with a hydrogen rail (hydrail) option. Most significantly, the results indicate that hydrail technology is feasible for the Piedmont service. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Rail, hydrail, life cycle assessment, criteria pollutants, well-to-wheel, single train simulation, modelling 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 72 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized -iii- DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of Michigan State University. The author(s) are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of either the North Carolina Department of Transportation or any federal agency, such as the Federal Department of Transportation and Federal Railroad Administration at the time of publication. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. -i- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the North Carolina DOT Rail Division and DOT R&D Division for funding this project. Lynn Harris has assisted with provision of information that improved the precision of the modelling and provided useful feedback throughout the project. Dave Cook from Rail Propulsion System has provided guidance regarding the current equipment from his experience with previous North Carolina Rail Division projects. Various possible component and energy suppliers provided information that assisted with the project. The utilized single train simulator is an evolution and combination of tools first developed at the Birmingham Center for Railway Research and Education and WMG at the University of Warwick. -ii- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The North Carolina Department of Transportation Rail Division (NCDOT) has responsibility for the Piedmont passenger rail service between Raleigh and Charlotte, NC. Standard train configuration is two locomotives in a pull-pull configuration with three to four railcars depending on daily ridership demands. NCDOT plans to switch to a locomotive plus cab control unit (CCU) push-pull configuration by mid-2021. Counties along the route were previously in EPA air quality non-attainment status. Combustion of diesel results in EPA regulated pollutants as defined in 40CFR1033. NCDOT has the desire to reduce their environmental impact from rail operations, specifically emissions impacting air quality. Previous projects included the extensive testing of biodiesel and trial installation of aftertreatment systems to the existing locomotives to reduce exhaust emission pollutants. Hydrogen fuel cell propulsion technology, known as “hydrail”, offers the possibility to eliminate all harmful emissions from operations as the exhaust is water, primarily in vapor form, and therefore is considered a zero-emission option. NCDOT commissioned the Center for Railway Research and Education (CRRE) at Michigan State University (MSU) to assess the technical feasibility of a hydrogen fuel cell powertrain for the Piedmont service and estimate energy as well as emission impacts through the respective supply chain for diesel hybrid and hydrail options. Hydrogen is an energy carrier and, therefore, can be produced from many different feedstocks including fossil fuels, biomass, and electricity with varying impacts on emissions and energy consumption. The authors utilized modelling tools to estimate feasibility, energy and emissions impacts. For train operations the CRRE single train simulator was adapted and modified; for the supply chain well-to-wheel (WTW) assessment, the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model was employed. Route and train information were required inputs as well as efficiency maps for all major powertrain components, such as traction motors, generator, diesel engine, and fuel cell system. Where data was not available from NCDOT, pre-existing data in the modelling tools and information from literature was utilized. A traction motor map was developed at MSU. The train configuration with a diesel-electric locomotive and CCU was used as the benchmark. The simulator was validated with recorded data made available from NCDOT; simulation results were within acceptable margins compared with recorded data. In total 25 train configurations were modelled including battery hybrids, and nine hydrogen production pathways evaluated in addition to the conventional diesel supply chain. Primary results were that diesel hybrid options have the potential to reduce emissions and energy both from operations and on a WTW basis. However, implementation of the required propulsion components in an existing diesel locomotive is likely not possible due to space and weight constraints. Conversion of a CCU to house batteries or hydrail components appears to be a feasible choice. Zero-emissions cannot be achieved with a diesel hybrid as hydrocarbon combustion continues onboard the unmodified diesel locomotive. -iii- A hydrail solution is feasible as it is likely that all powertrain components could be installed on a locomotive or converted CCU. Refueling after one roundtrip would be necessary if a single locomotive plus unconverted CCU train configuration were adopted while it is likely that two roundtrips could be completed if a locomotive and converted CCU or two locomotive option would be implemented. Continuing to follow existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: a European Reference Resource
    Innovative Technologies for Light Rail and Tram: A European reference resource Briefing Paper 6 Hydrail - Hydrogen Hybrid and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Systems September 2015 Sustainable transport for North-West Europe’s periphery Sintropher is a five-year €23m transnational cooperation project with the aim of enhancing local and regional transport provision to, from and withing five peripheral regions in North-West Europe. INTERREG IVB INTERREG IVB North-West Europe is a financial instrument of the European Union’s Cohesion Policy. It funds projects which support transnational cooperation. Innovative technologies for light rail and tram Working in association with the POLIS European transport network, who are kindly hosting these briefing papers on their website. Report produced by University College London Lead Partner of Sintropher project Authors: Charles King, Giacomo Vecia, Imogen Thompson, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London. The paper reflects the views of the authors and should not be taken to be the formal view of UCL or Sintropher project. 4 Innovative technologies for light rail and tram Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Innovative technologies for light rail and tram – developing opportunities ................................................... 6 Hydrail Trams ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bionic Shape Design of Electric Locomotive and Aerodynamic Drag Reduction
    ARCHIVES OF TRANSPORT ISSN (print): 0866-9546 Volume 48, Issue 4, 2018 e-ISSN (online): 2300-8830 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.8369 BIONIC SHAPE DESIGN OF ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE AND AERODYNAMIC DRAG REDUCTION Zhenfeng WU1, Yanzhong HUO2, Wangcai DING3, Zihao XIE4 1, 2, 3, 4 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China Contact: 1) [email protected] Abstract: Bionics has been widely used in many fields. Previous studies on the application of bionics in locomotives and vehicles mainly focused on shape optimisation of high-speed trains, but the research on bionic shape design in the electric locomotive field is rare. This study investigated a design method for streamlined electric locomotives according to the principles of bionics. The crocodiles were chosen as the bionic object because of their powerful and streamlined head shape. Firstly, geometric characteristic lines were extracted from the head of a crocodile by analysing the head features. Secondly, according to the actual size requirements of the electric locomotive head, a free-hand sketch of the bionic electric locomotive head was completed by adjusting the position and scale of the geometric characteristic lines. Finally, the non- uniform rational B-splines method was used to establish a 3D digital model of the crocodile bionic electric locomotive, and the main and auxiliary control lines were created. To verify the drag reduction effect of the crocodile bionic electric locomotive, numerical simulations of aerodynamic drag were performed for the crocodile bionic and bluff body electric locomotives at different speeds in open air by using the CFD software, ANSYS FLUENT16.0.
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE GG1 4800 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark
    PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE GG1 4800 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark Friends of GG1 4800 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania Strasburg, Pennsylvania April 23, 1983 he GG1 was a remarkable design, and so The locomotive required two frames; one of the two pantographs. Steps at the ends successful, because of its integrative each frame was a one-piece casting from the of the prototype GG1 led to the pantographs T synthesis of innovations from many General Steel Castings Corporation and was on the roof. But, as long as a pantograph was fields of engineering — mechanical, electrical, machined by Baldwin at Eddystone, Pennsyl- raised and “hot”, access was prevented by a industrial. vania. The two frames, each nearly forty feet blocking plate at the top of the steps. Throwing In 1913, before the era of the GG1, the long, held three driver axle assemblies and a a lever swung the plate clear but caused the Pennsylvania Railroad decided to electrify its two-axle pilot truck. Driver axles fit into roller pantograph to de-energize by dropping. tracks in the vicinity of Philadelphia. The bearing boxes that could move vertically in system, at 11,000 volts and 25 hertz, expanded pedestal jaws in the frame. The driver axle Three pairs of General Electric GEA-627-A1 until by the early 1930s it stretched from New was surrounded by a quill on which was electric motors were mounted in each frame. York City south to Wilmington, Delaware, and mounted a ring gear driven by the pinions of Each pair drove one quill.
    [Show full text]
  • General Motor Diesel Locomotive
    (Govt. of India) (Ministry of Railways) INTRODUCTION HAND BOOK ON GENERAL MOTOR DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE (For official use only) IRCAMTECH/2006/M/D/GM loco/1.0 FEBRUARY-2006 Centre for Advanced Maintenance TECHnology Excellence in Maintenance MAHARAJPUR, GWALIOR – 474020 INTRODUCTION HAND BOOK ON GENERAL MOTOR DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE i PREFACE The GM Locomotives have been included in the Diesel Locomotive fleet of Indian railway. Production of GM locomotive has already started in DLW, Varanasi. The 4000 HP, computer controlled GM locomotive has a large number of special and improved features vis-a-vis the Alco design diesel locomotive presently running in Indian railway. All those in the field of diesel locomotive need to get acquainted with the GM locomotive. This book “Introduction hand book on GM locomotive” prepared by the CAMTECH has been prepared with the purpose of disseminating the introductory information to all those in diesel loco maintenance field. The suggestions are invited from the readers to improve and make the book more useful. Any such suggestion shell be included in next publication. Date: - 28.02.2006 KUNDAN KUMAR Director (Mech) ii CONTENTS S No. Description Page No. 1. Preface i 2. Contents ii 3. Book details iii 4. Correction slips iv 5. Introduction of the GM Locomotive 1 to 2 6. General information data 3 to6 7. Various parts and its location 7 to 21 8. Fuel Oil System 22 to 25 9. Cooling Water System 26 to 30 10. Lube Oil System 31 to 37 11. Air Intake System 38 to 41 12. Compressed air system 42 to 43 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Sali DIESEL-ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE Empresa Ferroviaria Andina S.A, Bolivia
    SALi DIESEL-ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE Empresa Ferroviaria Andina S.A, Bolivia At the end of 2017, the Andina-FCA Railway Company and Stadler Valencia signed a contract for the supply of the first three SALi locomotives to be used for freight transport services on its metric gauge railway network in Bolivia. SALi is a 6-axle diesel-electric locomotive with an ultra-lightweight design and with forefront technology, to successfully face the challenges entailed in operating on metre-gauge networks under conditions of great altitude (over 5,000 metres above sea-level) at a maximum speed of 100km/h, combining a high-power output at great altitude with reduced fuel consumption. It features 6 AC traction motors and two acoustic and heat-insulated driver’s cabs, to enhance comfort under extreme temperature conditions. Due to its design and performance, it is destined to become the benchmark locomotive of the Bioceanic Rail Integration Corridor which, crossing Bolivia, will link the Peruvian port of Ilo with the port of Santos, near Sao Paulo in Brazil. www.stadlerrail.com Stadler Rail Group Stadler Rail Valencia S.A. Ernst-Stadler-Strasse 1 Pol. Ind. Mediterráneo. Mitjera 6 CH-9565 Bussnang E-46550 Albuixech (Valencia) Phone +41 71 626 21 20 Phone +34 96 141 50 00 [email protected] [email protected] Technical features Vehicle data Technology – Based on proven models such as the EURO4000, UKLIGHT and Customer Empresa Ferroviaria Andina S.A EURODUAL. Region Bolivia – Suitable for operations at high altitude (over 5,000 m above
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: a Review
    materials Review Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: A Review Etienne Rivard * , Michel Trudeau and Karim Zaghib * Centre of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage, Hydro-Quebec, 1806, boul. Lionel-Boulet, Varennes J3X 1S1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.R.); [email protected] (K.Z.) Received: 18 April 2019; Accepted: 11 June 2019; Published: 19 June 2019 Abstract: Numerous reviews on hydrogen storage have previously been published. However, most of these reviews deal either exclusively with storage materials or the global hydrogen economy. This paper presents a review of hydrogen storage systems that are relevant for mobility applications. The ideal storage medium should allow high volumetric and gravimetric energy densities, quick uptake and release of fuel, operation at room temperatures and atmospheric pressure, safe use, and balanced cost-effectiveness. All current hydrogen storage technologies have significant drawbacks, including complex thermal management systems, boil-off, poor efficiency, expensive catalysts, stability issues, slow response rates, high operating pressures, low energy densities, and risks of violent and uncontrolled spontaneous reactions. While not perfect, the current leading industry standard of compressed hydrogen offers a functional solution and demonstrates a storage option for mobility compared to other technologies. Keywords: hydrogen mobility; hydrogen storage; storage systems assessment; Kubas-type hydrogen storage; hydrogen economy 1. Introduction According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it is almost certain that the unusually fast global warming is a direct result of human activity [1]. The resulting climate change is linked to significant environmental impacts that are connected to the disappearance of animal species [2,3], decreased agricultural yield [4–6], increasingly frequent extreme weather events [7,8], human migration [9–11], and conflicts [12–14].
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce
    RAIL INDUSTRY DECARBONISATION TASKFORCE FINAL REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR RAIL JULY 2019 | WITH THE SUPPORT OF RSSB DECARBONISATION TASKFORCE | FINAL REPORT | 01 Foreword I am pleased to present, on behalf of the Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce and RSSB, the final report responding to the UK Minister for Rail’s challenge to the industry to remove “all diesel only trains off the track by 2040” and “produce a vision for how the rail industry will decarbonise.” The initial report, published in January 2019, set out credible technical options to achieve this goal and was widely welcomed by stakeholders. RIA has published its report on the Electrification Cost Challenge. This final report confirms that the rail industry can lead the way in Europe on the drive to decarbonise. It sets out the key building blocks required to achieve the vision that the rail industry can be a major contributor to the UK government’s1 target of net zero carbon2, 3 by 2050, provided that we start now. The GB rail system continues to be one of the lowest carbon modes of transport. It has made material progress in the short time since the publication of the initial report. • The industry has continued to develop technologies toward lower carbon. • RSSB has completed its technical report into decarbonisation, T1145. • The investigation into alternatives for freight, T1160, is well underway. • The Network Rail System Operator is conducting a strategic review to develop the lowest cost pathway for rail to decarbonise to contribute to the national net zero carbon target. The Taskforce is very cognisant of the government review of the rail industry ongoing under the independent chairmanship of Keith Williams and we have provided evidence accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles in Tunnels
    SAND2020-4507 R Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles in Tunnels Austin M. Glover, Austin R. Baird, Chris B. LaFleur April 2020 Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. 2 ABSTRACT There are numerous vehicles which utilize alternative fuels, or fuels that differ from typical hydrocarbons such as gasoline and diesel, throughout the world. Alternative vehicles include those running on the combustion of natural gas and propane as well as electrical drive vehicles utilizing batteries or hydrogen as energy storage. Because the number of alternative fuels vehicles is expected to increase significantly, it is important to analyze the hazards and risks involved with these new technologies with respect to the regulations related to specific transport infrastructure, such as bridges and tunnels. This report focuses on hazards presented by hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles that are different from traditional fuels. There are numerous scientific research and analysis publications on hydrogen hazards in tunnel scenarios; however, compiling the data to make conclusions can be a difficult process for tunnel owners and authorities having jurisdiction over tunnels. This report provides a summary of the available literature characterizing hazards presented by hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles, including light-duty, medium and heavy-duty, as well as buses. Research characterizing both worst-case and credible scenarios, as well as risk-based analysis, is summarized. Gaps in the research are identified to guide future research efforts to provide a complete analysis of the hazards and recommendations for the safe use of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles in tunnels.
    [Show full text]
  • H2@Railsm Workshop
    SANDIA REPORT SAND2019-10191 R Printed August 2019 H2@RailSM Workshop Workshop and report sponsored by the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office, and the US Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration. Prepared by Mattie Hensley, Jonathan Zimmerman Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New MexiCo 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Hydrogen Powertrains with the Battery Powered Electric Vehicle and Investigation of Small-Scale Local Hydrogen Production Using Renewable Energy
    Review Comparison of Hydrogen Powertrains with the Battery Powered Electric Vehicle and Investigation of Small-Scale Local Hydrogen Production Using Renewable Energy Michael Handwerker 1,2,*, Jörg Wellnitz 1,2 and Hormoz Marzbani 2 1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany; [email protected] 2 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Plenty Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Climate change is one of the major problems that people face in this century, with fossil fuel combustion engines being huge contributors. Currently, the battery powered electric vehicle is considered the predecessor, while hydrogen vehicles only have an insignificant market share. To evaluate if this is justified, different hydrogen power train technologies are analyzed and compared to the battery powered electric vehicle. Even though most research focuses on the hydrogen fuel cells, it is shown that, despite the lower efficiency, the often-neglected hydrogen combustion engine could be the right solution for transitioning away from fossil fuels. This is mainly due to the lower costs and possibility of the use of existing manufacturing infrastructure. To achieve a similar level of refueling comfort as with the battery powered electric vehicle, the economic and technological aspects of the local small-scale hydrogen production are being investigated. Due to the low efficiency Citation: Handwerker, M.; Wellnitz, and high prices for the required components, this domestically produced hydrogen cannot compete J.; Marzbani, H. Comparison of with hydrogen produced from fossil fuels on a larger scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit M 6-Transmission in Diesel Locomotive
    UNIT M 6-TRANSMISSION IN DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE OBJECTIVE The objective of this unit is to make you understand about • the need for transmission in a diesel engine • the duties of an ideal transmission • the requirements of traction • the relation between HP and Tractive Effort • the factors related to transmission efficiency • various modes of transmission and their working principle • the application of hydraulic transmission in diesel locomotive STRUCTURE 1. Introduction 2. Duties of an ideal transmission 3. Engine HP and Locomotive Tractive Effort 4. Factors related to efficiency 5. Rail and wheel adhesion 6. Types of transmission system 7. Principles of Mechanical Transmission 8. Principles of Hydrodynamic Transmission 9. Application of Hydrodynamic Transmission ( Voith Transmission ) 10. Principles of Electrical Transmission 11. Summary 12. Self assessment 1 1. INTRODUCTION A diesel locomotive must fulfill the following essential requirements- 1. It should be able to start a heavy load and hence should exert a very high starting torque at the axles. 2. It should be able to cover a very wide speed range. 3. It should be able to run in either direction with ease. Further, the diesel engine has the following drawbacks: • It cannot start on its own. • To start the engine, it has to be cranked at a particular speed, known as a starting speed. • Once the engine is started, it cannot be kept running below a certain speed known as the lower critical speed (normally 35-40% of the rated speed). Low critical speed means that speed at which the engine can keep itself running along with its auxiliaries and accessories without smoke and vibrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Trains – an Effective Alternative to Rail Electrification?
    HYDROGEN TRAINS – AN EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO RAIL ELECTRIFICATION? Tuesday 22 May 2018, Edinburgh Conclusions Hydrogen is increasingly being used as an energy vector in transport. The Workshop examined these applications and looked at the use of hydrogen, fuel cells for trains as an alternative to electrification. The Workshop concentrated predominantly on regional trains and drew attendees from the hydrogen and rail industries in roughly equal numbers. Policymakers from different tiers of government were also represented. Some participants came from mainland EU and Canada but the majority of participants were from the UK. Policy Developments • Alternative solutions to diesel trains are needed so that the rail sector can comply with energy and environmental policies and decarbonise the rail network. • The European Commission will continue to encourage cleaner fuels, both through "carrots" such as funding for research (including the Fuel Cell Hydrogen Joint Undertaking which is 50% funded by EU money) and "sticks" such as legislative requirements for clean fuels infrastructure • The UK Railways Minister has challenged the rail industry to look at the way in which diesel only trains can be removed from operation by 2040 as part of a wide challenge to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality across the rail sector. • In response to the Minister’s challenge, a Task Force has been set up with Malcolm Brown (Chief Executive, Angel Trains) as Chair. It will report back to the Minister in Autumn 2018. • There is no one size fits all when the UK Government looks at alternatives to diesel. Considerations such as affordability and Value for Money will be important considerations.
    [Show full text]