DOCSLIB.ORG

H2@Railsm Workshop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H2@Railsm Workshop SANDIA REPORT SAND2019-10191 R Printed August 2019 H2@RailSM Workshop Workshop and report sponsored by the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office, and the US Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration. Prepared by Mattie Hensley, Jonathan Zimmerman Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New MexiCo 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (865) 576-8401 Facsimile: (865) 576-5728 E-Mail: [email protected] Online ordering: http://www.osti.gov/scitech Available to the public from U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Rd Alexandria, VA 22312 Telephone: (800) 553-6847 Facsimile: (703) 605-6900 E-Mail: [email protected] Online order: https://classic.ntis.gov/help/order-methods/ 2 ABSTRACT This report serves as the proceedings of the H2@RailSM Workshop held by the US Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) and the US Department of Transportation’s (DOT’s) Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) on March 26-27, 2019 at Michigan State University in Lansing, MI. The workshop was specifically held to help identify needed research to accelerate technology development and industry commercialization regarding the use of hydrogen fuel cell systems in locomotives and rail applications. Experts and stakeholders from academia, government, and industry met at the workshop to assess the state of the art on rail propulsion. Discussions focused specifically on using fuel cells, operational requirements, and lessons learned about early fuel cell rail projects, and the identification of current technology gaps and collaborative R&D needed to close these gaps. This report summarizes the diverse perspectives and constructive ideas generated by the dedicated individuals who attended the workshop. Prepared by: Sandia National Laboratories 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are extended to US Department Of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) Director Sunita Satyapal and Melissa Shurland, US Department Of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Program Manager, Office of Research, Development and Technology, for overall management of the workshop. Special thanks to Pete Devlin, Technology Development Manager for FCTO and Dr. Shuk Han Chan, FCTO Fellow, for leading the planning and organizing of the workshop. We are grateful of Sanjay Gupta of Michigan State University for delivering the opening remarks that inspired and helped frame this workshop and Andreas Hoffrichter of Michigan State University’s Center for Railway Research and Education. The workshop organizers wish to thank those who presented informative briefings at the workshop on the status of relevant technologies and key challenges, including Mark Maday, Phani Raj, Momoko Tamaoki, Carrie Schindler, Elena Hof, Leanna Belluz, Seky Chang, Michael Fore, Michael Cleveland, Mark Duve, Scott Nason, Reid Larson, Alan Mace, Rob Harvey, Jens Steger, Andreas Frixen, Andreas Hoffrichter, Rajesh Ahluwalia, Brian Ehrhart, and Lynn Harris. We gratefully acknowledge the valuable ideas and insights contributed by the stakeholders who participated in the H2@RailSM Workshop. The willingness of these experts to share their time and knowledge has helped to identify current and emerging opportunities to accelerate the development and deployment of hydrogen rail technologies. Participating organizations are listed in Appendix B of this report. 4 CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................9 1. Technical Sessions ..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Introductory Remarks .................................................................................................................... 12 1.1.1. Welcoming Remarks from Michigan State University ................................................ 12 1.1.2. Welcoming Remarks from Fuel Cell Technologies Office ......................................... 12 2. Session I: Domestic Government Perspectives ................................................................................... 14 2.1. Federal Railroad Administration Program R&D Overview ..................................................... 14 2.2. Federal Railroad Administration Locomotive Alternative Fuels and Cryogenic Commodity Transportation Projects and Regulations ....................................................... 14 2.3. California State Perspectives ......................................................................................................... 15 2.4. San Bernardino County Transportation Authority .................................................................... 15 2.5. Panel Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 16 3. Session II: Overview of International Status ........................................................................................ 17 3.1. Hydrogen Rail Status in Germany ................................................................................................ 17 3.2. Hydrogen Rail Status in Canada ................................................................................................... 17 3.3. Hydrogen Rail Status in South Korea .......................................................................................... 18 3.4. Panel Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 18 4. Session III: Industry Perspectives ........................................................................................................... 19 4.1. Operator Perspectives .................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1. The American Association of Railroads ........................................................................ 19 4.1.2. BNSF Railway .................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.3. Norfolk Southern Railway ............................................................................................... 19 4.1.4. Panel Discussion ................................................................................................................ 20 4.2. Technology Developer Perspectives ............................................................................................ 20 4.2.1. Chart Industries ................................................................................................................. 20 4.2.2. Ballard ................................................................................................................................. 21 4.2.3. Hydrogenics ....................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.4. Stadler US ........................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.5. Alstom ................................................................................................................................. 22 4.2.6. Panel Discussion ................................................................................................................ 23 5. Session IV: Hydrogen Rail Assessment ................................................................................................. 24 5.1. Hydrogen Rail Development ........................................................................................................ 24 5.2. Total Cost of Ownership for Line Haul, Yard Switchers and Regional Passenger Locomotives ............................................................................................................................. 24 5.3. Hydrogen for Rail Applications ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bionic Shape Design of Electric Locomotive and Aerodynamic Drag Reduction
    ARCHIVES OF TRANSPORT ISSN (print): 0866-9546 Volume 48, Issue 4, 2018 e-ISSN (online): 2300-8830 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.8369 BIONIC SHAPE DESIGN OF ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE AND AERODYNAMIC DRAG REDUCTION Zhenfeng WU1, Yanzhong HUO2, Wangcai DING3, Zihao XIE4 1, 2, 3, 4 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China Contact: 1) [email protected] Abstract: Bionics has been widely used in many fields. Previous studies on the application of bionics in locomotives and vehicles mainly focused on shape optimisation of high-speed trains, but the research on bionic shape design in the electric locomotive field is rare. This study investigated a design method for streamlined electric locomotives according to the principles of bionics. The crocodiles were chosen as the bionic object because of their powerful and streamlined head shape. Firstly, geometric characteristic lines were extracted from the head of a crocodile by analysing the head features. Secondly, according to the actual size requirements of the electric locomotive head, a free-hand sketch of the bionic electric locomotive head was completed by adjusting the position and scale of the geometric characteristic lines. Finally, the non- uniform rational B-splines method was used to establish a 3D digital model of the crocodile bionic electric locomotive, and the main and auxiliary control lines were created. To verify the drag reduction effect of the crocodile bionic electric locomotive, numerical simulations of aerodynamic drag were performed for the crocodile bionic and bluff body electric locomotives at different speeds in open air by using the CFD software, ANSYS FLUENT16.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucester Railway Carriage & Wagon Co. 1St
    Gloucester Railway Carriage & Wagon Co. 1st Generation DMU’s for British Railways A Review Rodger P. Bradley Gloucester RC&W Co.’s Diesel Multiple Units Rodger P Bradley As we know the history of the design and operation of diesel – or is it oil-engine powered? – multiple unit trains can be traced back well beyond nationalisation in 1948, although their use was not widespread in Britain until the mid 1950s. Today, we can see their most recent developments in the fixed formation sets operated over long distance routes on today’s networks, such as those of the Virgin Voyager design. It can be argued that the real ancestry can be seen in such as the experimental Michelin railcar and the Beardmore 3-car unit for the LMS in the 1930s, and the various streamlined GWR railcars of the same period. Whilst the idea of a self-propelled passenger vehicle, in the shape of numerous steam rail motors, was adopted by a number of the pre- grouping companies from around the turn of the 19th/20th century. (The earliest steam motor coach can be traced to 1847 – at the height of the so-called to modernise the rail network and its stock. ‘Railway Mania’.). However, perhaps in some ways surprisingly, the opportunity was not taken to introduce any new First of the “modern” multiple unit designs were techniques in design or construction methods, and built at Derby Works and introduced in 1954, as the majority of the early types were built on a the ‘lightweight’ series, and until 1956, only BR and traditional 57ft 0ins underframe.
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE GG1 4800 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark
    PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE GG1 4800 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark Friends of GG1 4800 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania Strasburg, Pennsylvania April 23, 1983 he GG1 was a remarkable design, and so The locomotive required two frames; one of the two pantographs. Steps at the ends successful, because of its integrative each frame was a one-piece casting from the of the prototype GG1 led to the pantographs T synthesis of innovations from many General Steel Castings Corporation and was on the roof. But, as long as a pantograph was fields of engineering — mechanical, electrical, machined by Baldwin at Eddystone, Pennsyl- raised and “hot”, access was prevented by a industrial. vania. The two frames, each nearly forty feet blocking plate at the top of the steps. Throwing In 1913, before the era of the GG1, the long, held three driver axle assemblies and a a lever swung the plate clear but caused the Pennsylvania Railroad decided to electrify its two-axle pilot truck. Driver axles fit into roller pantograph to de-energize by dropping. tracks in the vicinity of Philadelphia. The bearing boxes that could move vertically in system, at 11,000 volts and 25 hertz, expanded pedestal jaws in the frame. The driver axle Three pairs of General Electric GEA-627-A1 until by the early 1930s it stretched from New was surrounded by a quill on which was electric motors were mounted in each frame. York City south to Wilmington, Delaware, and mounted a ring gear driven by the pinions of Each pair drove one quill.
    [Show full text]
  • Blending Hydrogen Into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: a Review of Key Issues
    Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-5600-51995 March 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev Prepared under Task No. HT12.2010 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5600-51995 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility
    The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD Nick Little Shanelle Foster, PhD Raphael Isaac, PhD Orwell Madovi Darren Tascillo Center for Railway Research and Education Michigan State University Henry Center for Executive Development 3535 Forest Road, Lansing, MI 48910 NCDOT Project 2019-43 FHWA/NC/2019-43 October 2020 -i- FEASIBILITY REPORT The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility October 2020 Prepared by Center for Railway Research and Education Eli Broad College of Business Michigan State University 3535 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 USA Prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation – Rail Division 860 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27603 -ii- Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/NC/2019-43 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Piedmont Service: Hydrogen Fuel Cell Locomotive Feasibility October 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Andreas Hoffrichter, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2384-4463 Nick Little Shanelle N. Foster, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-5500 Raphael Isaac, PhD Orwell Madovi Darren M. Tascillo 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Railway Research and Education 11. Contract or Grant No. Michigan State University Henry Center for Executive Development 3535 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48910 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report Research and Development Unit 104 Fayetteville Street December 2018 – October 2020 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 14. Sponsoring Agency Code RP2019-43 Supplementary Notes: 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Sali DIESEL-ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE Empresa Ferroviaria Andina S.A, Bolivia
    SALi DIESEL-ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE Empresa Ferroviaria Andina S.A, Bolivia At the end of 2017, the Andina-FCA Railway Company and Stadler Valencia signed a contract for the supply of the first three SALi locomotives to be used for freight transport services on its metric gauge railway network in Bolivia. SALi is a 6-axle diesel-electric locomotive with an ultra-lightweight design and with forefront technology, to successfully face the challenges entailed in operating on metre-gauge networks under conditions of great altitude (over 5,000 metres above sea-level) at a maximum speed of 100km/h, combining a high-power output at great altitude with reduced fuel consumption. It features 6 AC traction motors and two acoustic and heat-insulated driver’s cabs, to enhance comfort under extreme temperature conditions. Due to its design and performance, it is destined to become the benchmark locomotive of the Bioceanic Rail Integration Corridor which, crossing Bolivia, will link the Peruvian port of Ilo with the port of Santos, near Sao Paulo in Brazil. www.stadlerrail.com Stadler Rail Group Stadler Rail Valencia S.A. Ernst-Stadler-Strasse 1 Pol. Ind. Mediterráneo. Mitjera 6 CH-9565 Bussnang E-46550 Albuixech (Valencia) Phone +41 71 626 21 20 Phone +34 96 141 50 00 [email protected] [email protected] Technical features Vehicle data Technology – Based on proven models such as the EURO4000, UKLIGHT and Customer Empresa Ferroviaria Andina S.A EURODUAL. Region Bolivia – Suitable for operations at high altitude (over 5,000 m above
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: a Review
    materials Review Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: A Review Etienne Rivard * , Michel Trudeau and Karim Zaghib * Centre of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage, Hydro-Quebec, 1806, boul. Lionel-Boulet, Varennes J3X 1S1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.R.); [email protected] (K.Z.) Received: 18 April 2019; Accepted: 11 June 2019; Published: 19 June 2019 Abstract: Numerous reviews on hydrogen storage have previously been published. However, most of these reviews deal either exclusively with storage materials or the global hydrogen economy. This paper presents a review of hydrogen storage systems that are relevant for mobility applications. The ideal storage medium should allow high volumetric and gravimetric energy densities, quick uptake and release of fuel, operation at room temperatures and atmospheric pressure, safe use, and balanced cost-effectiveness. All current hydrogen storage technologies have significant drawbacks, including complex thermal management systems, boil-off, poor efficiency, expensive catalysts, stability issues, slow response rates, high operating pressures, low energy densities, and risks of violent and uncontrolled spontaneous reactions. While not perfect, the current leading industry standard of compressed hydrogen offers a functional solution and demonstrates a storage option for mobility compared to other technologies. Keywords: hydrogen mobility; hydrogen storage; storage systems assessment; Kubas-type hydrogen storage; hydrogen economy 1. Introduction According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it is almost certain that the unusually fast global warming is a direct result of human activity [1]. The resulting climate change is linked to significant environmental impacts that are connected to the disappearance of animal species [2,3], decreased agricultural yield [4–6], increasingly frequent extreme weather events [7,8], human migration [9–11], and conflicts [12–14].
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Delivery Roadmap
    Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Technologies Technical Team Roadmap RoadmapJuly 2017 This roadmap is a document of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership. U.S. DRIVE (United States Driving Research and Innovation for Vehicle efficiency and Energy sustainability) is a voluntary, non‐binding, and nonlegal partnership among the U.S. Department of Energy; United States Council for Automotive Research (USCAR), representing Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors; five energy companies — BPAmerica, Chevron Corporation, Phillips 66 Company, ExxonMobil Corporation, and Shell Oil Products US; two utilities — Southern California Edison and DTE Energy; and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The Hydrogen Delivery Technical Team is one of 13 U.S. DRIVE technical teams (“tech teams”) whose mission is to accelerate the development of pre‐competitive and innovative technologies to enable a full range of efficient and clean advanced light‐duty vehicles, as well as related energy infrastructure. For more information about U.S. DRIVE, please see the U.S. DRIVE Partnership Plan, https://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/us-drive-partnership-plan-roadmaps-and-accomplishments or www.uscar.org. Hydrogen Delivery Technical Team Roadmap Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................................. vi Mission .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles in Tunnels
    SAND2020-4507 R Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles in Tunnels Austin M. Glover, Austin R. Baird, Chris B. LaFleur April 2020 Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. 2 ABSTRACT There are numerous vehicles which utilize alternative fuels, or fuels that differ from typical hydrocarbons such as gasoline and diesel, throughout the world. Alternative vehicles include those running on the combustion of natural gas and propane as well as electrical drive vehicles utilizing batteries or hydrogen as energy storage. Because the number of alternative fuels vehicles is expected to increase significantly, it is important to analyze the hazards and risks involved with these new technologies with respect to the regulations related to specific transport infrastructure, such as bridges and tunnels. This report focuses on hazards presented by hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles that are different from traditional fuels. There are numerous scientific research and analysis publications on hydrogen hazards in tunnel scenarios; however, compiling the data to make conclusions can be a difficult process for tunnel owners and authorities having jurisdiction over tunnels. This report provides a summary of the available literature characterizing hazards presented by hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles, including light-duty, medium and heavy-duty, as well as buses. Research characterizing both worst-case and credible scenarios, as well as risk-based analysis, is summarized. Gaps in the research are identified to guide future research efforts to provide a complete analysis of the hazards and recommendations for the safe use of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles in tunnels.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Hydrogen Powertrains with the Battery Powered Electric Vehicle and Investigation of Small-Scale Local Hydrogen Production Using Renewable Energy
    Review Comparison of Hydrogen Powertrains with the Battery Powered Electric Vehicle and Investigation of Small-Scale Local Hydrogen Production Using Renewable Energy Michael Handwerker 1,2,*, Jörg Wellnitz 1,2 and Hormoz Marzbani 2 1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Ingolstadt, Esplanade 10, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany; [email protected] 2 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Plenty Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Climate change is one of the major problems that people face in this century, with fossil fuel combustion engines being huge contributors. Currently, the battery powered electric vehicle is considered the predecessor, while hydrogen vehicles only have an insignificant market share. To evaluate if this is justified, different hydrogen power train technologies are analyzed and compared to the battery powered electric vehicle. Even though most research focuses on the hydrogen fuel cells, it is shown that, despite the lower efficiency, the often-neglected hydrogen combustion engine could be the right solution for transitioning away from fossil fuels. This is mainly due to the lower costs and possibility of the use of existing manufacturing infrastructure. To achieve a similar level of refueling comfort as with the battery powered electric vehicle, the economic and technological aspects of the local small-scale hydrogen production are being investigated. Due to the low efficiency Citation: Handwerker, M.; Wellnitz, and high prices for the required components, this domestically produced hydrogen cannot compete J.; Marzbani, H. Comparison of with hydrogen produced from fossil fuels on a larger scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cell Power Spring 2021
    No 67 Spring 2021 www.fuelcellpower.wordpress.com FUEL CELL POWER The transition from combustion to clean electrochemical energy conversion HEADLINE NEWS CONTENTS Hydrogen fuel cell buses in UK cities p.2 The world’s first hydrogen fuel cell Zeroavia’s passenger plane flight p.5 double decker buses have been Intelligent Energy’s fuel cell for UAV p.6 delivered to the City of Aberdeen. Bloom Energy hydrogen strategy p.7 Wrightbus is following this up with Hydrogen from magnesium hydride paste p.11 orders from several UK cities. ITM expanding local production of zero emission hydrogen p.12 The Scottish Government is support- Alstom hydrogen fuel cell trains p.13 ing the move to zero emission Zero carbon energy for emerging transport prior to the meeting of World markets p.16 COP26 in Glasgow later this year. Nel hydrogen infrastructure p.18 Australia’s national hydrogen strategy p.20 The United Nations states that the Ballard international programmes p.22 world is nowhere close to the level FuelCell Energy Government Award p.26 of action needed to stop dangerous Ulemco’s ZERRO ambulance p.27 climate change. 2021 is a make or Adelan fuel cells in UK programme p.28 break year to deal with the global Wilhelmsen zero emission HySHIP p.29 climate emergency. Hydrogen fuel cell yacht p.30 NEWS p.10 EVENTS p.30 HYDROGEN FUEL CELL BUSES IN UK CITIES WORLD’S FIRST in tackling air pollution in the city.” Councillor Douglas Lumsden added: “It is HYDROGEN FUEL CELL fantastic to see the world’s first hydrogen- DOUBLE DECKER BUS IN powered double decker bus arrive in ABERDEEN Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • DECARBONISING MARITIME OPERATIONS in NORTH SEA OFFSHORE WIND O&M Innovation Roadmap Produced for the UK Government Dft and FCDO CONTENTS
    DECARBONISING MARITIME OPERATIONS IN NORTH SEA OFFSHORE WIND O&M Innovation Roadmap produced for the UK Government DfT and FCDO CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 4 2 Introduction 10 3 Methodology and Quality Assurance 14 3.1 Market scenarios 15 3.2 Industry engagement 16 4 Vessel and Wind Farm Growth Scenarios 18 4.1 Offshore Wind Deployment Growth Scenarios 19 4.2 O&M Vessel Growth Scenarios 22 5 Current Landscape of Industry 29 5.1 Overview of Industry 30 5.2 Lifecycle of Offshore Wind Farm and Associated Vessels 31 5.3 O&M Vessels 32 5.4 New Technologies on the Horizon 44 5.5 Portside Infrastructure 65 5.6 Offshore Charging Infrastructure 81 5.7 Autonomous and Remote Operated Vessels 85 5.8 AI and Data Driven Solutions and Tools for Optimised O&M Planning and Marine Coordination 88 5.9 Supply Chain Capability and Potential Benefits 90 6 Identification of Risks and Barriers to Adoption for the Decarbonisation of the Sector 95 6.1 Methodology 96 6.2 Ratings 97 6.3 Economic 98 6.4 Policy/Regulatory 102 6.5 Structural 106 6.6 Organisational 111 6.7 Behavioural 113 6.8 Summary 114 7 Route MapA 115A 7.1 Track 1 – Assessment of Technologies Methodology 117 7.2 Track 1 – Technology Assessment Results 119 7.3 Track 2 – R&D Programme 122 7.4 Track 3–Demonstrations at Scale 123 7.5 Track 4– Enabling Actions 126 7.6 Summary 135 8 Conclusions 137 Appendix 1 - Model building and review quality assurance 149 Appendix 2 - O&M Vessels Model Assumptions 151 Appendix 3 - Emission Calculations 153 Appendix 4 - Technology readiness level scale 154 Appendix 5 - Engagement ReportA 155 List of Figures 189 List of TablesA 191 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The UK’s offshore wind industry has seen rapid growth in the past ten years with more than 10.4GW of installed capacity now in UK waters and a target of 40GW by 2030.
    [Show full text]