DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule 4: Recommended Fort Nelson Land and Resource

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schedule 4: Recommended Fort Nelson Land and Resource SCHEDULE 4 RECOMMENDED FORT NELSON LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN < > Recommended � I : Fort Nelson ! A Component of British Columbia's Land Use Strategy Land and Resource Management Plan a. � C( _J Fort Nelson EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fort Nelson Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) is a full consensus recommendation on all aspects of land and resource management within a 98 000 square kilometre area built through participation by the public, local indusryt and government resource agencies. This Plan results in no anticipatedjob losses, stability for all resource-based industries such as tourism, oil and gas, mining and timber; seven proposed protected areas; a recommendation for a planning framework to provide co-operative and co-ordinated planning management in the Muskwa-Kechika; and an improved outlook for recreational activities and wildlife. The FortNelson Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) recommendations have been built over a four year time-frame by a core group of30 people. This group consisted of a solid cross section of public participants with local, regional and provincial interests, and agency staff, representing a wide range of values including access, agriculture, biodiversity, energy, forestry, guide outfitting, minerals, outdoor recreation and tourism, soil, transportation and utility corridors, trapping, visual quality, water and wildlife. The LRMP table worked with an "open-door" policy, using sectorbased negotiations. Local First Nations expressed aninterest inthe process, but chose not to participate. This was in part due to concerns that participation may compromise treaty negotiations, in addition to staffing andresource constraints. They were apprised of the LRMP progress through personal contacts, formal communications and the LRMPupdate packages, which were widely distributed. AlthoughFirst Nations were not formally represented at the LRMP Working Group, archaeological, cultural and heritage values were strongly endorsed by all the LRMP participants. This LRMP divides a 9. 8 millionhectare landbase into thirty-seven Resource Management Zones (RMZs), which are grouped into four different categories. 1. Enhanced Resource Development - Representing approximately 36% (3,564,900 hectares) of the land base. This category gives direction to manage land for oil and gas, mineral andtimber resources, with an emphasis on the recreation and tourism resources along the Alaska Highway corridor. This category is made up of the Resource Management Zones where investments in resource development are Recommended Fort Nelson Land and Resource Management Plan encouraged. This category builds on existing legislation and regulations. There are 4 RMZs in this category. 2. General Resource Development- Representing approximately 24% I (2,445,000 hectares) of the land base The intent in this category is to manage for a wide array of integrated resource values. In these RMZs resource development will be integrated with the requirements of other I resource values. Developments are subject to all applicable provincial regulations. There are 1O RMZs in this category. Major River Corridors Sub-Category- Identified to highlight the rJ management of the important values within the river corridors such as archaeological, cultural, heritage, recreational, scenic, timber and energy. 3. Muskwa-Kechika Special Management - Representing approximately 29% (2,911,700 hectares)ofthe land base. This category gives direction to manage in such a way that resource development can proceed while minimizing impacts on other resource values. The Resource Management Zones within this category contain the most restrictive objectives and strategies for development. There are 16 RMZs in this category. Major River Corridors Sub-Category - Identified to highlight management of all the important values within the river corridors such as archaeological, cultural, heritage, recreational, riparian, wildlife habitat and industrial. 4. Proposed Protected Area - Representing approximately 11 % (1,051,000 hectares) of the land base. This category contains the zones that are r proposed for protected area designation for natural, cultural, heritage and/or recreational values as defined by the Protected Area Strategy for BC. Logging, mining, energy and hydroelectric exploration and development are prohibited in those areas designated under the Park Act. There are 7 Goal 1 Resource Management Zones and 13 Goal 2 sites identified in this category. All the Proposed Protected Areas stand alone within the Fort Nelson Plan area as functioning units. Additionally, long­ term solutions were developed for the tenured oil and gas interest in the Thinatea and Prophet River Recreation Area Proposed Protected Areas. • Denetiah (97,200 ha) - This area provides a cross-section of the Rocky Mountain Trench, other special features are Dall and Denetiah lakes, with the intact Denetiah watershed, and the historic Davie Trail. The remote nature of this area enhances its recreation experience. Access corridor will be allowed; the section across the Rocky Mountain Trench to be designated in such a way as to maintain the opportunity for access. Recommended Fort Nelson Land and Resource Management Plan ii • Kina Lakes (28,600 ha) - Located in the south-eastern portion of the plan area this zone has significant archaeological value with a traditional historic commercial fishery site, a significant native village, native pack trails, an old wagon trail and a spiritual site. The entire area has very high scenic qualities of escarpments/cuesta topography, along with high recreation use. This area provides representation of the Muskwa Plateau Ecosection. • Liard River Corridor (81,900 ha) - Featuring the Grand Canyon of the Liard, ammonite fossils, a bolted steel and wooden oil derrick, Hudson's Bay Trading Post, archaeological sites and significant grizzly bear habitat. The Liard River Corridor is representative of the Hyland Highlands Ecosection and could be considered as a Heritage River candidate. Designation on this area has to take into account the Alaska Highway Pipeline reserve. Any access for utility through this proposed protected area will be subject to the management plan. • Maxhamish Lake (27,600 ha)-Featuring a large lake with white sandy beaches this Proposed Protected Area supports significant recreational opportunity in an area rich with wateifowl and fish values. This area also provides representation of the Etsho Plateau Ecosection. The type of designation on this area has to allow for the opportunity in the future for an access route to the lake for recreational purposes. • Northern Rocky Mountains (635,900 ha)- The largest of the Proposed Protected Areas this zone rests in the southern portion of the plan area and provides a core for the large intact predator/prey system that exists together with high density and diver~ity of large mammal species. The zones has some of the highest, most rugged mountains, and is substantially unroaded and undeveloped. This area has high wildlife and recreation value; and is very significant for wilderness and back country recreation experiences. This area provides excellent representation of the Eastern Muskwa Ranges and Muskwa Foothills ecosections. Within it there are special features such as Sleeping Chief Mountain, Mount Sylvia, Mount Mary Henry, significant wetlands along the Tuchodi River and the historic Bedeaux Trail. The Northern Rocky Mountains is the centre piece proposed protected area - combined with adjacent existing and proposed protected areas, a new Protected Area of771,793 hectares in size will protect significant values in the area. • Thinatea (19,500 ha)- This area provides representation of the Petitot Plain Ecosection. It is a good example of muskeg mixed with Recommended Fort Nelson Land and Resource Management Plan iii some associated upland forest. There is a significant stand of Jackpine in the RMZ; the area is important for habitat values, especially for waterfowl. The designation on the area has to consider existing oil and gas tenures with the Proposed Protected Area, and provide for the opportunity to directionally drill for pipeline purposes r under the north arm. r • Wokkpash (37,500 ha) - This zone is a Recreation Area. It has attained international significance with the Wokkpash Gorge (hoodoo canyon- 5 Km in length 30 m in height); Forlorn Gorge (narrow cleft r - 150 m deep and 25 m wide); Fusillier Glacier and stepped lakes; with significant recreation values such as hiking, camping, wildlife viewing, fishing, horseback riding and hunting. I • Goal 2-13 small areas (8,500 ba) - Site specific features such as ii provincially or regionally significant hot springs, archaeological sites, I rare ecosystems and recreation areas. The LRMP WG has allotted 1800 ha for the protection of old growth into this total; the location and stand type has not been determined yet. (A LRMP Working Group Subcommittee has been charged with the completion of this task, and is to report back by the first annual monitoring meeting). I The Plan has developed three levels of management direction. 1. General Management Direction: - applies to all values and resources on Crown land; - applies as a baseline for management; and - enhances and supports legislation, policies, existing processes and operational guidelines. 2. Category Management Direction: - combination of similar Resource Management Zones; - refines management regimes for the combination of RMZs; - reflects interest-based nature of the plan; and 3. RMZ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gyrfalcon Falco Rusticolus
    Gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus Rob Florkiewicz surveys, this area was included. Eight eyries are known from this Characteristics and Range The northern-dwelling Gyrfalcon is part of the province; however, while up to 7 of these eyries have the largest falcon in the world. It breeds mostly along the Arctic been deemed occupied in a single year, no more than 3 have been coasts of North America, Europe and Asia (Booms et al. 2008). productive at the same time. Based on these data and other Over its range, its colour varies from white through silver-grey to sightings, the British Columbia Wildlife Branch estimates the almost black; silver-grey is the most common morph in British breeding population in the province to be fewer than 20 pairs Columbia. It nests on cliff ledges at sites that are often used for (Chutter 2008). decades and where considerable amounts of guano can accumulate. Ptarmigan provide the Gyrfalcon's main prey in In British Columbia, the Gyrfalcon nests on cliff ledges on British Columbia and productivity appears dependent on mountains in alpine areas, usually adjacent to rivers or lakes. ptarmigan numbers. Large size and hunting prowess make the Occasionally, it nests on cliffs of river banks and in abandoned Gyrfalcon a popular bird with falconers, who breed and train Golden Eagle nests. them to hunt waterfowl and other game birds. Conservation and Recommendations Whilst the Gyrfalcon is Distribution, Abundance, and Habitat Most Gyrfalcons breed designated as Not at Risk nationally by COSEWIC, it is Blue-listed along the Arctic coast; however, a few breed in the northwest in British Columbia due to its small known breeding population portion of the Northern Boreal Mountains Ecoprovince of British (British Columbia Ministry of Environment 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • TREATY 8: a British Columbian Anomaly
    TREATY 8: A British Columbian Anomaly ARTHUR J. RAY N THE ANNALS OF NATIVE BRITISH COLUMBIA, 1999 undoubtedly will be remembered as the year when, in a swirl of controversy, Ithe provincial legislature passed the Nisga'a Agreement. The media promptly heralded the agreement as the province's first modern Indian treaty. Unmentioned, because it has been largely forgotten, was the fact that the last major "pre-modern" agreement affecting British Columbia -Treaty 8 - had been signed 100 years earlier. This treaty encompasses a sprawling 160,900-square-kilometre area of northeastern British Columbia (Map 1), which is a territory that is nearly twenty times larger than that covered by the Nisga'a Agreement. In addition, Treaty 8 includes the adjoining portions of Alberta and the Northwest Territories. Treaty 8 was negotiated at a time when British Columbia vehemently denied the existence of Aboriginal title or self-governing rights. It therefore raises two central questions. First, why, in 1899, was it ne­ cessary to bring northeastern British Columbia under treaty? Second, given the contemporary Indian policies of the provincial government, how was it possible to do so? The latter question raises two other related issues, both of which resurfaced during negotiations for the modern Nisga'a Agreement. The first concerned how the two levels of government would share the costs of making a treaty. (I will show that attempts to avoid straining federal-provincial relations over this issue in 1899 created troublesome ambiguities in Treaty 8.) The second concerned how much BC territory had to be included within the treaty area.
    [Show full text]
  • 20. Aboriginal Rights and Interests Effects
    20. ASSESSMENT OF ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS AND RELATED INTERESTS 20.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses potential adverse effects on Aboriginal and Treaty rights and related interests which may arise from the Project during construction, operations, decommissioning/reclamation, and post-closure. Underground mining activities have the potential to adversely affect Aboriginal and Treaty rights by interfering with Aboriginal groups’ ability to engage in practices, customs, and traditions that are integral to their distinctive cultures, and/or by interfering with the exercise of rights expressly recognized in a treaty. Interference with Aboriginal and Treaty rights is generally indirect, resulting from changes to environmental conditions that are necessary for the continued exercise of Aboriginal and Treaty rights. The assessment is based on information derived from the Proponent’s engagement with potentially- affected Aboriginal groups, environmental assessments carried out elsewhere in the Application/EIS, and the review of secondary data. Wherever possible, the assessment addresses potential effects on Aboriginal and treaty rights and related interests as understood from the perspective of the Aboriginal groups in question. Baseline reports informing this assessment are appended to the Application/EIS and include: Ethnographic Overview and Traditional Knowledge and Use Desk-Based Research Report (Appendix 17-A) and Saulteau First Nations Knowledge and Use Study for HD Mining Murray River Coal Project (Appendix 17-B). 20.2 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK The Crown has a legal duty to consult with and, where appropriate, accommodate Aboriginal interests when it contemplates a conduct that might adversely impact the potential or established Aboriginal or Treaty right. The Crown delegated procedural aspects of this duty, with respect to the Project, to the Proponent through the Section 11 Order and EIS Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Aboriginal Interests & Use Study On
    Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Aboriginal Interests & Use Study on the Enbridge Gateway Pipeline An Assessment of the Impacts of the Proposed Enbridge Gateway Pipeline on the Carrier Sekani First Nations May 2006 Carrier Sekani Tribal Council i Aboriginal Interests & Use Study on the Proposed Gateway Pipeline ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Aboriginal Interests & Use Study was carried out under the direction of, and by many members of the Carrier Sekani First Nations. This work was possible because of the many people who have over the years established the written records of the history, territories, and governance of the Carrier Sekani. Without this foundation, this study would have been difficult if not impossible. This study involved many community members in various capacities including: Community Coordinators/Liaisons Ryan Tibbetts, Burns Lake Band Bev Ketlo, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Sara Sam, Nak’azdli First Nation Rosa McIntosh, Saik’uz First Nation Bev Bird & Ron Winser, Tl’azt’en Nation Michael Teegee & Terry Teegee, Takla Lake First Nation Viola Turner, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Elders, Trapline & Keyoh Holders Interviewed Dick A’huille, Nak’azdli First Nation Moise and Mary Antwoine, Saik’uz First Nation George George, Sr. Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Rita George, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Patrick Isaac, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Peter John, Burns Lake Band Alma Larson, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Betsy and Carl Leon, Nak’azdli First Nation Bernadette McQuarry, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Aileen Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Donald Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Guy Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Vince Prince, Nak’azdli First Nation Kenny Sam, Burns Lake Band Lillian Sam, Nak’azdli First Nation Ruth Tibbetts, Burns Lake Band Ryan Tibbetts, Burns Lake Band Joseph Tom, Wet’suwet’en First Nation Translation services provided by Lillian Morris, Wet’suwet’en First Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Diversity
    Culture and Diversity Creating wellness together. The Agency In the late 1980’s the elders and lead- agreement in 1997 to provide commu- ers of the newly formed Carrier Sekani nity-based health programs. As the Tribal Council (CSTC) came together service needs in child welfare, social, and decided that it was time that social health and legal programs were on the and health issues were brought to the rise; these areas became the develop- forefront. The social well-being of the ment priorities for the agency. Land- Carrier and Sekani people needed im- mark events began with the incorpora- 11 First Nation provement and it was time to begin on tion of a small office and a handful of Communities a new path- one that would lead their employees, and with the guidance of a member nations to a better place and board of directors, the society moved Society membership is made up of a solid future. The CSTC took their first forward. step on this path by employing eight persons who are registered Today, CSFS is a leading organization people to support Carrier and Sekani members at the following 11 First with more than 170 skilled staff mem- families to navigate the Child Welfare Nations Communities: bers in Prince George, Vanderhoof, system. In addition, they saw the need Fort St. James and Burns Lake. 1. Sai’kuz First Nation (Stoney to have a patient advocate for Carrier Creek Indian Band people at the then Prince George Re- gional Hospital. 2. Wet’suwet’en First Nation (Broman Lake Indian Band) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Nations
    Dinjii Zhuu Nation : Tribal Nations Map Gwich’in Tribal Nations Map Inuvialuit Vuntut Western Artic Innuit Deguth OurOur OwnOwn NamesNames && LocationsLocations Inuvialuit woman Draanjik Gwichyaa T'atsaot'ine Iglulingmiut Teetl'it Yellow Knives Inuit family KitlinermiutCopper Inuit Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in Netsilingmiut Han Netsilik Inuit Tununirmiut Tanana Sahtú Hare Utkuhiksalingmiut Hanningajurmiut Tutchone Ihalmiut Inuit Woman & Child Akilinirmiut Kangiqliniqmiut Galyá x Kwáan Denesoline Nations: Laaxaayik Kwáan Deisleen Kwáan Chipeweyan Harvaqtuurmiut Tagish Aivilingmiut Áa Tlein Kwáan Gunaa xoo Kwáan Kaska Dena Jilkoot Kwáan Kaska Krest‘ayle kke ottine Chipeweyan band Jilkaat Kwáan Aak'w Kwáan Qaernermiut Xunaa Kwáan T'aa ku Kwáan S'aawdaan Kwáan Xutsnoowú Kwáan Kéex' Kwáan Paallirmiut Tarramiut Sheey At'iká Lingít Kwáan Shtax' héen Kwáan Des-nèdhè-kkè-nadè Nation Dene Woman Kooyu Kwáan Tahltan K'atlodeeche Ahialmiut Dene Tha' Hay River Dene Sanyaa Kwáan Slavey Sayisi Dene Siquinirmiut Takjik'aan Kwáan Lingít Men WetalTsetsauts Hinya Kwáan Nisga'a Inuit Hunter Tsimshian Kaí-theli-ke-hot!ínne Taanta'a Kwáan Dane-zaa Thlingchadinne Itivimiut Sikumiut K'yak áannii Tsek’ene Beaver Gáne-kúnan-hot!ínne Dog Rib Sekani Etthen eldili dene Gitxsan Lake Babine Wit'at Haida Gitxaala Thilanottine Hâthél-hot!inne Xàʼisla Haisla Nat'oot'en Wet'suwet'en Hoteladi Iyuw Imuun Beothuk WigWam Nuxalk Nation: Nihithawiwin Bella Coola Woodlands Cree Sikumiut man DakelhCarrier Tallheo Aatsista Mahkan, HeiltsukBella Bella Siksika chief Kwalhna Stuic Blackfoot Nation
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Nelson, BC, Canada | Red Seal Recruiting
    Fort Nelson, British Columbia Click here to view Fort Nelson Community Guide Click here to view Directory of Northern Rockies Community Services Fort Nelson is a beautiful town in the northeastern corner of British Columbia that sits on Historic Mile 300 of the Alaska Highway. It is the administrative centre of the vast Northern Rockies Regional Municipality, which is home to 7,000 residents (4,500 of which reside in Fort Nelson). The city boasts an amazing view of the Rocky Mountains and the surrounding wilderness is incredibly beautiful. Weather Winters tend to be cold and dry in Fort Nelson, while summers are generally warm and occasionally rainy. Average Yearly Precipitation Average Days with Rainfall per Year: 71.4 Average Days with Snowfall per Year: 66.1 Seasonal Average Temperatures (˚C) January: -21.2˚ April: 2.9˚ July: 16.8˚ October: 0.6˚ Additional Information For further information about annual climate data for Fort Nelson, please visit The Weather Network or Environment Canada using the links below: http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/canada_e.html Location Fort Nelson is situated at Mile 300 of the Alaska Highway. It sits east of the Rocky Mountains by the confluence of the Fort Nelson River, Muskwa River, and Prophet River. The city is approximately 380km North of Fort St. John and 950km (12 hours 45) Southeast of Whitehorse, Yukon. Driving Distances Fort St. John………………………………………………………380km (approx. 4 hours 47 minutes) Whitehorse...……………………………………………………950km (approx. 12 hours 45 minutes) Anchorage, Alaska…………………………………………………………….2082km (approx. 26 hours) Prince George….………………………………………………811km (approx. 10 hours 23 minutes) Transportation The nearest airport to Fort Nelson is the Fort Nelson Airport (YYE), which serves flights to and from Fort St.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Key to the Freshwater Fishes of British Columbia
    FIELD KEY TO THE FRESHWATER FISHES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA J.D. McPhail and R. Carveth Fish Museum, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 (604) 822-4803 Fax (604) 822-2416 © The Province of British Columbia Published by the Resources Inventory Committee Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data McPhail, J. D. (John Donald) Field key to the freshwater, fishes of British Columbia Also available through the Internet. Previously issued: Field key to the freshwater fishes of British Columbia. Draft for 1994 field testing, 1994. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-3830-6 (Field guide) ISBN 0-7726-3844-6 (Computer file) 1. Freshwater fishes - British Columbia - Identification. I. Carveth, R. II. Resources Inventory Committee (Canada) III. Title. QL626.5.B7M36 1999 597.176'09711 C99-960109-1 Additional Copies of this publication can be purchased from: Government Publications Centre Phone: (250) 387-3309 or Toll free: 1 -800-663-6105 Fax: (250) 387-0388 www.publications.gov.bc.ca Digital Copies are available on the Internet at: http://www.for.gov. bc.ca/ric Text copyright © 1993 J.D. McPhail Illustrations copyright © 1993 D.L. McPhail All rights reserved. Design and layout by D.L. McPhail "Admitted that some degree of obscurity is inseparable from both theology and ichthyology, it is not inconsistent with profound respect for the professors of both sciences to observe that a great deal of it has been created by themselves." Sir Herbert Maxwell TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction · i Region 1 - Vancouver Island 1 Region 2 - Fraser 27 Region 3 - Columbia 63 Region 4 - MacKenzie 89 Region 5 - Yukon 115 Region 6 - North Coast 127 Region 7 - Queen Charlotte Islands 151 Region 8 - Central Coast 167 Appendix 193 Acknowledgements .
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Skytrails: Perspectives on the Royal Canadian Air Force in the Arctic from the Pages of the Roundel, 1949-65 Richard Goette and P
    Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security Northern Skytrails Perspectives on the Royal Canadian Air Force in the Arctic from the Pages of The Roundel, 1949-65 Richard Goette and P. Whitney Lackenbauer Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security (DCASS) ISSN 2368-4569 Series Editors: P. Whitney Lackenbauer Adam Lajeunesse Managing Editor: Ryan Dean Northern Skytrails: Perspectives on the Royal Canadian Air Force in the Arctic from the Pages of The Roundel, 1949-65 Richard Goette and P. Whitney Lackenbauer DCASS Number 10, 2017 Cover: The Roundel, vol. 1, no.1 (November 1948), front cover. Back cover: The Roundel, vol. 10, no.3 (April 1958), front cover. Centre for Military, Security and Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Strategic Studies St. Jerome’s University University of Calgary 290 Westmount Road N. 2500 University Dr. N.W. Waterloo, ON N2L 3G3 Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 519.884.8110 ext. 28233 Tel: 403.220.4030 www.sju.ca/cfpf www.cmss.ucalgary.ca Arctic Institute of North America University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW, ES-1040 Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 403-220-7515 http://arctic.ucalgary.ca/ Copyright © the authors/editors, 2017 Permission policies are outlined on our website http://cmss.ucalgary.ca/research/arctic-document-series Northern Skytrails: Perspectives on the Royal Canadian Air Force in the Arctic from the Pages of The Roundel, 1949-65 Richard Goette, Ph.D. and P. Whitney Lackenbauer, Ph.D. Table of Contents Preface: Pioneers of the North (by Wing Commander J. G. Showler) .................... vi Foreword (by Colonel Kelvin P. Truss) ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Fracking Across Canada
    British Columbia Fracking Across Canada In November 2013, activists set up a mock fracking rig on Premier Christy Clark’s lawn to bring attention British Columbia to the risky practice. Home to what’s known as the world’s largest frack, British Columbia has shale gas reserves in the Horn River, Montney, Liard and Cordova basins, which are all located in the northeast corner of the province. Media reports state that: “In B.C. alone, 7,300 wells have been fractured since 2005, and between 500 and a 1,000 new ones are being permitted each year.” The frequency of fracking in the province is unparalleled. Over the course of 111 days in 2010, the world’s largest frack took place at Two Island Lake in the Horn River Basin. According to Ben Parfitt’s report Fractured Lines, there were 274 consecutive “stimulations” or fracks, with an average of 17 fracks per well using 5.6 million barrels of LNG plants, one of them being the Pacific Trail water, 111 million pounds of sand and unknown Pipeline (PTP) which runs from Summit Lake quantities of toxic chemicals. to Kitimat on almost the same route as the Northern Gateway Pipeline. The Canadian Society for Unconventional Resources estimates that B.C.’s three largest The PTP is a fracking pipeline that would shale basins hold up to 1,000 trillion cubic feet transport fracked gas from northeastern of natural gas.4 B.C. to LNG plants on the Pacific coast. The provincially-approved fracking pipeline could blaze a trail for further pipeline development According to Eoin Madden of B.C.’s Wilderness by clear-cutting forest and creating Committee, “There are currently permits in infrastructure for other proposals such as B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bc12 Report.Pdf
    Soils of the Fort Nelson Area of British Columbia K.W. G. VALENTINE Canada Department of Agriculture, Vancouver, B.C. REPORT No. 12 British Columbia Soi1 Survey Research Branch - Canada Department of Agriculture. 1971 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge the help of Mr. L. Farstad, Canada Depart- ment of Agriculture, Vancouver, and Mr. P. N. Sprout, British Columbia Depart- ment of Agriculture, Kelowna, who initiated the project and gave constructive advice during various parts of the field and office work. Mr. D. Hodgson helped with the field work in the summer of 1967. Soi1 analyses were carried out by Mr. S. K. Chan and Miss M. E. Turnbull. Mr. J. M. Wallace, Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Water Resources Branch, Vancouver, B.C., provided valuable information on the seasonal flood levels of the Muskwa and Fort Nelson rivers., Mr. R. A. Nemeth, pipeline engineer, Westcoast Transmission CO. Ltd., Van- couver, gave permission for information from his company’s Yoyo pipeline muskeg survey to be used in Fig. 5. Dr. H. Vaartnou, Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Beaverlodge, Alta., identified many of the plant specimens that were collected during the survey. Mr. G. W. Robertson, Agrometeorology Section, Canada Department of Agri- culture, Ottawa, supplied estimates of agroclimatic normals based on the Hopkins regression formulas. Mr. R. Marshall, Agroclimatology, British Columbia Depart- ment of Agriculture, also supplied much climatic data. The soi1 map and Fig. l-5, 11, 13, 15, and 16 were prepared by the Cartogra- phy Section, Soi1 Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa. Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on Short-Term Water Approvals and Use
    Quarterly Report on Short-Term Water Approvals and Use April to June 2011 About the BC Oil and Gas Commission The BC Oil and Gas Commission is an independent, single-window regulatory agency with responsibilities for overseeing oil and gas operations in British Columbia, including exploration, development, pipeline transportation and reclamation. The Commission’s core roles include reviewing and assessing applications for industry activity, consulting with First Nations, ensuring industry complies with provincial legislation and cooperating with partner agencies. The public interest is protected through the objectives of ensuring public safety, protecting the environment, conserving petroleum resources and ensuring equitable participation in production. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 2 Processes and Requirements Page 3 Results Page 4 Summary Page 7 Appendix A Page 8 Appendix B Page 9 Appendix C Page 12 1 BC Oil and Gas Commission Quarterly Report on Short-Term Water Approvals and Use Introduction The Oil and Gas Activities Act (OGAA) provides authority to the BC Oil and Gas Commission (Commission) to issue short-term water use approvals under Section 8 of the Water Act to manage short-term water use by the oil and gas industry. Approvals under Section 8 of the Water Act authorize the diversion and use of water for a term not exceeding 12 months. This report details the Commission’s responsibilities and authorities under Section 8 of the Water Act; it does not include the diversion and use of water approved by other agencies (such as the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, which has responsibility for water licensing) or for purposes other than oil and gas activities.
    [Show full text]