Itinerary for 8 Day/7 Night Package Incl. 4 Fly Outs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Draft for Public Review
Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Draft for Public Review Disclaimer: This draft management plan contains preliminary proposals that are subject to change and therefore may not necessarily reflect the position of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy. At the conclusion of the planning process, a revised management plan will be approved by the Ministry. January 2019 Cover Page Photo Credit: Al Hansen, BC Parks Area Supervisor Foreword by BC Treaty 8 First Nations WELCOME to our homeland. The Beaver (Dunne-za, Dane-zaa), Cree, Saulteau, Slavey (Dene), and TseK’ hene indigenous groups have occupied these lands since time immemorial. Treaty 8 was signed in the spirit of Peace and Friendship on June 21, 1899. British Columbia Treaty 8 Territory is hundreds of thousands of square kilometres in size and includes 8 groups: Blueberry River First Nations, Doig River First Nation, Fort Nelson First Nation, Halfway River First Nation, McLeod Lake Indian Band, Prophet River First Nation, Saulteau First Nations and West Moberly First Nations. Our relationship to the land has and continues to be the spiritual basis for our mode of life. The land has always, and will continue to, provide shelter, food, clothing, and the economic resources for our livelihood. As a First Nation, we have an obligation to implement our inherent rights that are affirmed by the Constitution Act, 1982. This includes sustainability of our resources in order for us to hunt, trap, fish, and continue our mode of life. Prior to the arrival of the Europeans we were actively involved in the management of our territories: the lands understood us and we understood the land. -
Appendix C: List of Other Park Systems
APPENDIX C LIST OF OTHER PARK SYSTEMS WITHIN THE PRRD The PRRD is well served with parks of various kinds and levels within its boundaries. Although there are no national parks within the PRRD, there is an abundance of provincial parks, protected areas and ecological reserves. The PRRD encompasses a portion of one of the largest Forest Districts in the province, the Fort St John Forest District which itself has an area of approximately 4.6 million hectares. The large size is as a result of the amount of crown land in the district area. The result of all of this open space area is that when compared to other regional districts across the province the PRRD comes out well especially when regional population densities are considered. As compared to other Regional districts such as: Regional District of East Kootenay The Regional District of East Kootenay (RDEK) has 28 provincial parks, 2 conservancy protected areas, 1 national park, 6 wildlife management areas, 93 recreation sites, 66 recreation trails and 3 Ducks Unlimited properties within their land area of 27, 560 sq km and a population density of 2.0 based on a total population of 56,685. Regional District of Central Kootenay (RDCK) has 28 provincial parks, 1 wilderness conservancy park, 1 ecological reserve, 2 wildlife management areas, 49 recreation sites and 64 trails. The RDCK has a land area of 22,130.72 sq km and a 2011 population of 58,441 for a population density of 2.6 persons per sq km. Regional District ‐ Regional Parks Comparison Selected Regional District Number Population -
Mount Robson Provincial Park, Draft Background Report
Mount Robson Provincial Park Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks DRAFT BACKGROUND REPORT September, 2006 Ministry of Environment Ministry of Environment BC Parks Omineca Region This page left blank intentionally Acknowledgements This Draft Background Report for Mount Robson Provincial Park was prepared to support the 2006/07 Management Plan review. The report was prepared by consultant Juri Peepre for Gail Ross, Regional Planner, BC Parks, Omineca Region. Additional revisions and edits were performed by consultant Leaf Thunderstorm and Keith J. Baric, A/Regional Planner, Omineca Region. The report incorporates material from several previous studies and plans including the Mount Robson Ecosystem Management Plan, Berg Lake Corridor Plan, Forest Health Strategy for Mount Robson Provincial Park, Rare and the Endangered Plant Assessment of Mount Robson Provincial Park with Management Interpretations, the Robson Valley Land and Resource Management Plan, and the BC Parks website. Park use statistics were provided by Stuart Walsh, Rick Rockwell and Robin Draper. Cover Photo: Berg Lake and the Berg Glacier (BC Parks). Mount Robson Provincial Park, Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks: DRAFT Background Report 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................1 Park Overview.................................................................................................................................................1 -
Order of the Executive Director May 14, 2020
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Park Act Order of the Executive Director TO: Public Notice DATE: May 14, 2020 WHEREAS: A. This Order applies to all Crown land established or continued as a park, conservancy, recreation area, or ecological reserve under the Park Act, the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act or protected areas established under provisions of the Environment and Land Use Act. B. This Order is made in the public interest in response to the COVID-19 pandemic for the purposes of the protection of human health and safety. C. This Order is in regard to all public access, facilities or uses that exist in any of the lands mentioned in Section A above, and includes but is not limited to: campgrounds, day-use areas, trails, playgrounds, shelters, visitor centers, cabins, chalets, lodges, resort areas, group campsites, and all other facilities or lands owned or operated by or on behalf of BC Parks. D. This Order is in replacement of the Order of the Executive Director dated April 8, 2020 and is subject to further amendment, revocation or repeal as necessary to respond to changing circumstances around the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemptions that were issued in relation to the previous Order, and were still in effect, are carried forward and applied to this Order in the same manner and effect. Province of British Columbia Park Act Order of the Executive Director 1 E. The protection of park visitor health, the health of all BC Parks staff, Park Operators, contractors and permittees is the primary consideration in the making of this Order. -
Fort Nelson, BC, Canada | Red Seal Recruiting
Fort Nelson, British Columbia Click here to view Fort Nelson Community Guide Click here to view Directory of Northern Rockies Community Services Fort Nelson is a beautiful town in the northeastern corner of British Columbia that sits on Historic Mile 300 of the Alaska Highway. It is the administrative centre of the vast Northern Rockies Regional Municipality, which is home to 7,000 residents (4,500 of which reside in Fort Nelson). The city boasts an amazing view of the Rocky Mountains and the surrounding wilderness is incredibly beautiful. Weather Winters tend to be cold and dry in Fort Nelson, while summers are generally warm and occasionally rainy. Average Yearly Precipitation Average Days with Rainfall per Year: 71.4 Average Days with Snowfall per Year: 66.1 Seasonal Average Temperatures (˚C) January: -21.2˚ April: 2.9˚ July: 16.8˚ October: 0.6˚ Additional Information For further information about annual climate data for Fort Nelson, please visit The Weather Network or Environment Canada using the links below: http://www.theweathernetwork.com/ http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/canada_e.html Location Fort Nelson is situated at Mile 300 of the Alaska Highway. It sits east of the Rocky Mountains by the confluence of the Fort Nelson River, Muskwa River, and Prophet River. The city is approximately 380km North of Fort St. John and 950km (12 hours 45) Southeast of Whitehorse, Yukon. Driving Distances Fort St. John………………………………………………………380km (approx. 4 hours 47 minutes) Whitehorse...……………………………………………………950km (approx. 12 hours 45 minutes) Anchorage, Alaska…………………………………………………………….2082km (approx. 26 hours) Prince George….………………………………………………811km (approx. 10 hours 23 minutes) Transportation The nearest airport to Fort Nelson is the Fort Nelson Airport (YYE), which serves flights to and from Fort St. -
Park User Fees Bcparks.Ca/Fees
Park User Fees bcparks.ca/fees PARK – DESCRIPTION FEE ADAMS LAKE - frontcountry camping $13.00 /party/night AKAMINA-KISHINENA - backcountry camping $5.00 /person/night ALICE LAKE - frontcountry camping $35.00 /party/night ALICE LAKE - group camping base fee $120.00 /group site/night ALICE LAKE - sani station $5.00 /discharge ALICE LAKE - walk/cycle in - frontcountry camping $23.00 /party/night ALLISON LAKE - frontcountry camping $18.00 /party/night ANHLUUT’UKWSIM LAXMIHL ANGWINGA’ASANSKWHL NISGA - frontcountry camping $20.00 /party/night ANSTEY-HUNAKWA - camping-annual fee $600.00 /vessel ANSTEY-HUNAKWA - marine camping $20.00 /vessel/night ARROW LAKES - Shelter Bay - frontcountry camping $20.00 /party/night BABINE LAKE MARINE - Pendleton Bay, Smithers Landing - frontcountry camping $13.00 /party/night BABINE MOUNTAINS – cabin $10.00 /adult/night BABINE MOUNTAINS – cabin $5.00 /child/night BAMBERTON - frontcountry camping $20.00 /party/night BAMBERTON - winter frontcountry camping $11.00 /party/night BEAR CREEK - frontcountry camping $35.00 /party/night BEAR CREEK - sani station $5.00 /discharge BEATTON - frontcountry camping $20.00 /party/night BEATTON - group picnicking $35.00 /group site/day BEAUMONT - frontcountry camping $22.00 /party/night BEAUMONT - sani station $5.00 /discharge BIG BAR LAKE - frontcountry camping $18.00 /party/night BIG BAR LAKE - Upper - long-stay camping $88.00 /party/week BIRKENHEAD LAKE - frontcountry camping $22.00 /party/night BIRKENHEAD LAKE - sani station $5.00 /discharge BLANKET CREEK - frontcountry camping -
Aviation Investigation Report A12w0004 Runway Overrun
AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A12W0004 RUNWAY OVERRUN 1263343 ALBERTA INC. (DBA ENERJET) BOEING 737-700, C-GDEJ FORT NELSON, BRITISH COLUMBIA 09 JANUARY 2012 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Aviation Investigation Report Runway Overrun 1263343 Alberta Inc. (dba Enerjet) Boeing 737-700, C-GDEJ Fort Nelson, British Columbia 09 January 2012 Report Number A12W0004 Summary The Enerjet Boeing 737-700 (registration C-GDEJ, serial number 32427) was operating as ENJ401 from Fort St. John to Fort Nelson, British Columbia. At 1117 Mountain Standard Time, during the landing rollout on Runway 03, ENJ401 overran the runway end by about 230 feet. There were no injuries to the 112 passengers or 6 crew members and no damage to the aircraft. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. -2- Factual Information History of the Flight Enerjet flight 401 (ENJ401) originated out of Calgary, Alberta, on the morning of 09 January 2012. The flight was being operated under Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) Subpart 705. The flight was sub-chartered through North Cariboo Flying Service Ltd. for Worley Parsons’ employees commuting to Fort Nelson, British Columbia, for work. ENJ401 made stops in Edmonton, Alberta, and Fort St. John, British Columbia, to pick up passengers. A total of 112 passengers and 6 crew members were on board ENJ401 when it departed Fort St. John for Fort Nelson at 1042.1 While in cruise at FL260, 2 approximately 25 minutes before landing, the captain, who was the pilot flying, briefed the first officer for the approach, informing him that a visual approach to Runway 03, backed up by the instrument landing system (ILS), would be completed with a flap setting of 40 and an autobrake setting of 3. -
Muskwa-Kechika Case Study (Northeastern British Columbia and Adjacent Areas of the Yukon and Northwest Territories)
Conserving Canada’s Natural Capital: the Boreal Forest Muskwa-Kechika Case Study (Northeastern British Columbia and adjacent areas of the Yukon and Northwest Territories) Prepared for: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy Ottawa, Ontario By: R. McManus Consulting Ltd. and Salmo Consulting Inc. Calgary, Alberta July 2004 NRTEE Muskwa-Kechika Case Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Boreal Forest Program................................................................................. 1 1.2 Case Studies........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Muskwa-Kechika Case Study............................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Methods....................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1.1 Literature Review.................................................................................... 4 1.3.1.2 Interviews................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1.3 Multi-stakeholder Workshop .................................................................. 5 2. Legislation and Policy Framework..................................................................... 6 2.1 Case Study Region.............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Major Players............................................................................................. -
Cumulative Watershed Effects of Fuel Management in the Western United States Elliot, William J.; Miller, Ina Sue; Audin, Lisa
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-231 January 2010 Cumulative Watershed Effects of Fuel Management in the Western United States Elliot, William J.; Miller, Ina Sue; Audin, Lisa. Eds. 2010. Cumulative watershed effects of fuel management in the western United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-231. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 299 p. ABSTRACT Fire suppression in the last century has resulted in forests with excessive amounts of biomass, leading to more severe wildfires, covering greater areas, requiring more resources for suppression and mitigation, and causing increased onsite and offsite damage to forests and watersheds. Forest managers are now attempting to reduce this accumulated biomass by thinning, prescribed fire, and other management activities. These activities will impact watershed health, particularly as larger areas are treated and treatment activities become more widespread in space and in time. Management needs, laws, social pressures, and legal findings have underscored a need to synthesize what we know about the cumulative watershed effects of fuel management activities. To meet this need, a workshop was held in Provo, Utah, on April, 2005, with 45 scientists and watershed managers from throughout the United States. At that meeting, it was decided that two syntheses on the cumulative watershed effects of fuel management would be developed, one for the eastern United States, and one for the western United States. For the western synthesis, 14 chapters were defined covering fire and forests, machinery, erosion processes, water yield and quality, soil and riparian impacts, aquatic and landscape effects, and predictive tools and procedures. -
Inc. Chronology Management Team Carl
An Adirondack Chronology by The Adirondack Research Library of Protect the Adirondacks! Inc. Chronology Management Team Carl George Professor of Biology, Emeritus Department of Biology Union College Schenectady, NY 12308 [email protected] Richard E. Tucker Adirondack Research Library 897 St. David’s Lane Niskayuna, NY 12309 [email protected] Abbie Verner Archivist, Town of Long Lake P.O. Box 42 Long Lake, NY 12847 [email protected] Frank M. Wicks Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Union College Schenectady, NY 12308 [email protected] Last revised and enlarged – 25 March 2012 (No. 63) www.protectadks.org Adirondack Chronology 1 last revised 3/26/2012 Contents Page Adirondack Research Library 2 Introduction 2 Key References 4 Bibliography and Chronology 18 Special Acknowledgements 19 Abbreviations, Acronyms and Definitions 22 Adirondack Chronology – Event and Year 36 Needed dates 388 Adirondack Research Library The Adirondack Chronology is a useful resource for researchers and all others interested in the Adirondacks. This useful reference is made available by the Adirondack Research Library (ARL) committee of Protect the Adirondacks! Inc., most recently via the Schaffer Library of Union College, Schenectady, NY where the Adirondack Research Library has recently been placed on ‘permanent loan’ by PROTECT. Union College Schaffer Library makes the Adirondack Research Library collections available to the public as they has always been by appointment only (we are a non-lending ‘special research library’ in the grand scheme of things. See http://libguides.union.edu/content.php?pid=309126&sid=2531789. Our holdings can be searched It is hoped that the Adirondack Chronology may serve as a 'starter set' of basic information leading to more in- depth research. -
APPENDIX B Sampling and Analysis Plan for Surficial Sediment Sampling
SKAGWAY ORE BASIN RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B Sampling and Analysis Plan for Surficial Sediment Sampling 25 January 2018 Report No. 1657231-006-R-Rev0 17 April 2017 STUDY DESIGN AND SAMPLING & ANALYSIS PLAN Skagway Ore Basin Sediment Assessment Submitted to: White Pass & Yukon Route Railway PO Box 435 Skagway, AK 99840 Report Number: 1657231-002-R-Rev1 Distribution: 1 copy - White Pass & Yukon Route Railway REPORT 1 copy - Golder Associates Ltd. ORE BASIN SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Site Description......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Summary of Historical Information ............................................................................................................ 1 1.3.1 Sediment Chemistry, Toxicity and Benthic Community Data .............................................................. 1 1.3.2 Other Historical Information ................................................................................................................ 2 1.3.3 Sediment Transport Assessment ........................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Remaining -
Papilio Series) 2006
(NEW April 28 PAPILIO SERIES) 2006 TAXONOMIC STUDIES AND NEW TAXA OF NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott (also editor), Michael S. Fisher, Norbert G. Kondla, Steve Kohler, Crispin S. Guppy, Stephen M. Spomer, and B. Chris Schmidt Abstract. New diversity is reported and discussed among North American butterflies. Several dozen new taxa are named. A new "sibling" species has been found to occur throughout the Rocky Mts., introducing a new butterfly species to most states in western U.S. and to southern Alberta and BC. Several taxa of Colias, Euphydryas, Lycaena, and Plebejus are raised to species status. Many nam.e changes are made, and many taxa are switched between species to create several dozen new combinations. The relevance of species concepts to difficult groups of butterflies is explored. Introduction This paper consists of miscellaneous taxonomic studies on North American butterflies, some in the northeast, but mostly in the west. Most of the diversity of butterfly fauna in North America is in the western mountainous areas, where the human population is lower, so it has taken longer to study western butterflies, and a lot more study is needed. We have made new findings on many wes.tern butterflies, and this progress is reported below. And Scott recently moved his collection out of old dermestid-infested drawers into fine very-tight ones that those beetles cannot enter, and in the process of resorting them found a dozen unnamed subspecies, which are named below. As we study our butterflies and learn more and more about them, a disturbing pattern has emerged.