DOCSLIB.ORG

Entomologica Austriaca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomologica Austriaca Jahr/Year: 2020 Band/Volume: 0027 Autor(en)/Author(s): Diverse Autoren Artikel/Article: Bericht über das sechste ÖEG-Insektencamp: Wirbellose Artenvielfalt rund um Güssing (Südburgenland) 137-210 Entomologica Austriaca www.entomologie.org Band 27: 137–210 Wien, 14.03.2020 Bericht über das sechste ÖEG-Insektencamp: Wirbellose Artenvielfalt rund um Güssing (Südburgenland) Elisabeth Huber, Sandra Aurenhammer, Hanna Bauer, Julian Becker, Roman Borovsky, Nora Bruggraber, Gregor Degasperi, Hermann Elsasser, Thomas Frieß, David Fröhlich, Julia Gladitsch, Benjamin Gorfer, Johanna Gunczy, Lorenz W. Gunczy, Helge Heimburg, Erwin Holzer, Gabriel Kirchmair, Christian Komposch, Antonia Körner, Gernot Kunz, Leonhard Lorber, Anna Moser, Wolfgang Paill, Petra Schattanek, Johannes Volkmer, Herbert C. Wagner, Benjamin Wiesmair, Anna Wolf, Lukas Zangl, Thomas Zechmeister & Oliver Zweidick Abstract: Report on the sixth “insect camp” of the Austrian Entomological So- ciety: invertebrate diversity all around Güssing (Southern Burgenland, Austria) The sixth insect camp of the Austrian Entomological Society took place in the vicinity of Güssing in Southern Burgenland (Austria) from May 16th to May 19th, 2019. In total, 24 participants from Tyrol, Vienna, and Styria attended the field course and were accompanied and supported by 23 specialists for various taxonomic groups during the camp and/or at the postprocessing. During those four days, the participants studied and applied different trapping and preparation approaches, trained deter- mination, gathered knowledge on various groups of arthropods and gastropods and were able to network with taxonomists. Five localities were investigated and in total 788 species were detected: 11 Odonata, 48 Hetero ptera, 60 Auchenorrhyncha, 321 Coleo ptera, 2 Pleco ptera, 1 Meco ptera, 1 Megalo ptera, 47 Di ptera, 90 Hymeno ptera, 10 Tricho ptera, 105 Lepido ptera, 68 Araneae, 5 Opiliones, 6 Pseudoscorpiones, and 16 Gastropoda species. 27 species records are new for Burgenland: 12 Auchenorrhyncha, 3 Coleo ptera, 4 Di ptera, 7 Hymeno ptera and 1 Araneae species. Key words: biodiversity, entomology, Arthropoda, Naturpark Weinidyll, faunistics, Naturschutzbund Burgenland. Citation: Huber E., Aurenhammer S., Bauer H., Becker J., Borovsky R., Brug- graber N., Degasperi G., Elsasser H., Frieß T., Fröhlich D., Gladitsch J., Gor- fer B., Gunczy J., Gunczy L. W., Heimburg H., Holzer E., Kirchmair G., Komposch C., Körner A., Kunz G., Lorber L., Moser A., Paill W., Schattanek P., Volkmer J., Wagner H. C., Wiesmair B., Wolf A., Zangl L., Zechmeister T. & Zweidick O. 2020: Bericht über das sechste ÖEG-Insektencamp: Wirbellose Artenvielfalt rund um Güssing (Südburgenland). – Entomologica Austriaca 27: 137–210. Einleitung Trotz seiner hohen Diversität kann das Südburgenland als einer der von der biologischen Forschung am stärksten vernachlässigten Landschaftsteile Österreichs betrachtet werden. 137 Huber E. et al. 2020 Entomologica Austriaca 27: 137–210 Abb. 1: Teilnehmer beim intensiven Bestimmen von Libellen (links) und beim Abbauen der Barberfallen (rechts). Fotos: E. Huber. Ein Blick zurück zu den frühen Naturforschern o enbart allerdings ein ganz anderes Bild: Güssing war eine Hochburg der Naturkunde. Der weltbekannte Botaniker Carolus Clusius hat hier im 16. Jahrhundert gelebt und gewirkt. In Güssing und auf der Burg Schlaining verfasste er sein bedeutendes Werk „Stirpium Nomenclator Pannonicus“ – es handelt sich hierbei um die erste systematische Erfassung der Flora des Pannonikums mitsamt den ungarischen Gemeinnamen. Clusius´ Arbeiten zur Flora von Österreich und Ungarn sollten über mehr als 100 Jahre maßgebend bleiben. In jüngerer Zeit hat das Güssinger Umland Wissenschafter der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz angezogen, die enge und langjährige Beziehungen zu diesem Naturraum führten. Der Freilandökologe und engagierte Naturschutzbiologe Univ.-Prof. Dr. Franz Wolkinger war viele Jahre der Präsident der Internationalen Clusius-Forschungsgesellschaft. Dement- sprechend hoch war seine Aktivität im Südburgenland. Weiters hatte der Grazer Zoologe Univ.-Prof. Dr. Otto Kepka in Punitz (Bezirk Güssing) eine Wildtier-Forschungsstation eingerichtet. Der Begeisterung für die organismische Biologie versprühende Professor besuchte und besammelte mit seinen Studenten im Rahmen der Zoologischen Exkur- sionen die Güssinger Fischteiche, den Burgberg, das Stremtal und den Punitzer Wald. Erste Ergebnisse dieser intensiven Exkursions- und Lehrtätigkeit sind im „Naturführer Südburgenland“ publiziert (W & B 1996). Der Grundstein für naturkundliches Forschen und Vermitteln in diesem bemerkenswerten Gebiet war somit gelegt. Im Rahmen des sechsten ÖEG-Insektencamps sollten diese biologischen Tätig- keiten fortgeführt werden und mit angehenden BiologInnen und naturkundlich Interes- sierten zumindest für einige Tage auf den Spuren von Carolus Clusius, Franz Wolkinger und Otto Kepka die Kleintierwelt dieser pannonischen Landschaft erforscht werden. Ziel des ÖEG-Insektencamps ist es, die Artenkenntnis der TeilnehmerInnen zu erwei- tern, Exkursionserfahrung zu sammeln und faunistische Daten zu erheben. Um dies zu erreichen, wurde das Insektencamp dabei von erfahrenen Taxonomen und Ökologen unterstützt, die dabei ihr praktisches und theoretisches Wissen teilten. Während des ÖEG-Insektencamps 2019 konnten 24 TeilnehmerInnen aus Tirol, Wien, Niederöster- reich und der Steiermark ihre entomologischen, arachnologischen oder malakologischen Fähigkeiten in dem Gebiet rund um Güssing erweitern. Innerhalb von vier Tagen (16.–19. Mai 2019) wurden verschiedenste Biotope – trockene Magerstandorte, Feucht ächen, 138 Huber E. et al. 2020 Entomologica Austriaca 27: 137–210 Abb. 2: Gruppenfotos des sechsten ÖEG-Insektencamps 2019 in Güssing. Fotos: W.E. Holzinger, E. Huber. Baumbestände, Gewässer – mit einer Vielzahl an Erfassungsmethoden untersucht. Die vielfältigen faunistischen Erhebungen wurden in Artenlisten dokumentiert. Teilnehmerliste und Organisation Die örtliche Unterstützung sowie die Mithilfe bei der Organisation und Probe ächenwahl erfolgte durch Dr. Ernst Breitegger (Naturschutzbund Burgenland). Folgende Personen haben am ÖEG-Insektencamp in Güssing vor Ort teilgenommen und/oder bei der Determination und Publikation mitgearbeitet (Abb. 2): Sandra Aurenhammer (Graz), Hanna Bauer (Graz), Julia Bauer (Breitenau am Hoch- lantsch), Julian Becker (Graz), Roman Borovsky (St. Kathrein am O enegg), Ernst Breitegger (Güssing), Elisabeth Brugger-Schiefermüller (Wip ng), Nora Maja Bruggraber (Ilz), Lara Gartler (Graz), Benjamin Gorfer (Graz), Gregor Degasperi (Innsbruck), Her- mann Elsasser (Fladnitz im Raabtal), omas Frieß (Graz), David Fröhlich (Heiligen- kreuz am Waasen/Stmk), Johanna Gunczy (Leutschach a. d. Weinstraße), Lorenz Wido Gunczy (Graz), Clara Hajek (Voitsberg), Helge Heimburg (Graz), Philipp Holzinger (Graz), Werner Holzinger (Graz), Erwin Holzer (Anger), Elisabeth Huber (Graz), Gabriel 139 Huber E. et al. 2020 Entomologica Austriaca 27: 137–210 Abb. 3: Übersichtskarte der 5 Probeflächen des ÖEG-Insektencamps 2019 im Gebiet um Güssing (Süd- burgenland): Naturschutzbundwiese (1), Zickentaler Moor (2), Tobajer Kogel (3), Güssinger Fischteiche (4), Urbersdorfer Stausee (5). Grafik: J. Volkmer (Kartenbasis: OpenStreetMap). Kirchmair (Graz), Christian Komposch (Graz), Antonia Körner (Graz), Gernot Kunz (Graz), Leonhard Lorber (Graz), Markus Mayr (Innsbruck), Samuel Messner (Graz), Anna Moser (Graz), Marc Mußmann (Wien), Wolfgang Paill (Graz), Johannes Passler (Graz), Christina Pilz (Markt Hartmannsdorf), Petra Schattanek (Innsbruck), Berna- dette Schindelegger (Lunz), Eva Schneider (Hall in Tirol), Christina Siegl (Innsbruck), Jana Skorjanz (Graz), Julia Techt (Graz), Johannes Volkmer (Linz), Herbert Christian Wagner (Graz), Christina Weisser (Graz), Benjamin Wiesmair (Innsbruck), Anna Wolf (Graz), Adrian Wolfgang (Graz), Lukas Zangl (Graz), omas Zechmeister (Illmitz), Oliver Zweidick (Graz). Gebietsbeschreibung Fünf vorausgewählte Flächen wurden bearbeitet, die jeweils noch in weitere Teil ächen untergliedert wurden. Mit dieser Auswahl wurde versucht, eine hohe Vielfalt an Lebens- räumen zu untersuchen, um ein möglichst großes Artenspektrum zu dokumentieren. Sämtliche Koordinatenangaben entsprechen dem WGS84. Naturschutzbundwiese – „Winkelwiese“ (1a–c) Die ca. 7 ha große „Winkelwiese“ be ndet sich in der Gemeinde Urbersdorf und ist im Besitz des Naturschutzbundes Burgenlands. Die frühere klein ächige landwirtschaftli- che Nutzung bis hin zu den 1990er Jahren ist hauptverantwortlich für die mosaikartige Struktur der Wiese mit den unterschiedlichen Trophiestufen und Wiesentypen, wie 140 Huber E. et al. 2020 Entomologica Austriaca 27: 137–210 Abb. 4: Probefläche 1a–c: Naturschutzbundfläche „Winkelwiese“. Grafik: J. Volkmer (Kartenbasis: Google- Maps). beispielsweise verschiedene Magerrasen, Seggenriede und Streuwiesen (F et al. 2013). Die Probe äche 1 wird aufgeteilt in: • Den begradigten Limbach mit seiner Ufervegetation, die sich im südlichen Bereich zu einem Weichaugehölzstreifen ausbreitet. Koordinaten: 47°03'05" N 16°22'52" E, Höhe: 209 m ü.A., Fundortkürzel: 1a • Feuchtgebüsche, welche sich über die Fläche verteilen. Koordinaten: 47°03'09" N 16°22'48" E, Höhe: 210 m ü.A., Fundortkürzel: 1b • Eine heterogene Mähwiese mit unterschiedlichen Strukturen und einem ehemaligen, mäandrierenden
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods

    Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods

    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
  • Seasonal Changes in Lipid and Fatty Acid Profiles of Sakarya

    Seasonal Changes in Lipid and Fatty Acid Profiles of Sakarya

    Eurasian Journal of Forest Science ISSN: 2147 - 7493 Copyrights Eurasscience Journals Editor in Chief Hüseyin Barış TECİMEN University of Istanbul, Faculty of Forestry, Soil Science and Ecology Dept. İstanbul, Türkiye Journal Cover Design Mert EKŞİ Istanbul University Faculty of Forestry Department of Landscape Techniques Bahçeköy-Istanbul, Turkey Technical Advisory Osman Yalçın YILMAZ Surveying and Cadastre Department of Forestry Faculty of Istanbul University, 34473, Bahçeköy, Istanbul-Türkiye Cover Page Bolu forests, Turkey 2019 Ufuk COŞGUN Contact H. Barış TECİMEN Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Faculty of Forestry, Soil Science and Ecology Dept. İstanbul, Turkey [email protected] Journal Web Page http://dergipark.gov.tr/ejejfs Eurasian Journal of Forest Science Eurasian Journal of Forest Science is published 3 times per year in the electronic media. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. In submitting the manuscript, the authors certify that: They are authorized by their coauthors to enter into these arrangements. The work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review or thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication has been approved by all the authors and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)

    List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)

    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
  • Ecology of the Acalypta Species Occurring in Hungary (Insecta: Heteroptera: Tingidae) Data to the Knowledge on the Ground-Living Heteroptera of Hungary, № 3

    Ecology of the Acalypta Species Occurring in Hungary (Insecta: Heteroptera: Tingidae) Data to the Knowledge on the Ground-Living Heteroptera of Hungary, № 3

    Rédei et al.: Ground-living Heteroptera of Hungary, № 3. - 73 - ECOLOGY OF THE ACALYPTA SPECIES OCCURRING IN HUNGARY (INSECTA: HETEROPTERA: TINGIDAE) DATA TO THE KNOWLEDGE ON THE GROUND-LIVING HETEROPTERA OF HUNGARY, № 3. D. RÉDEI1,* – B. HARMAT2 – L. HUFNAGEL3 *e-mail: [email protected] 1 Department of Entomology, Corvinus University of Budapest, H-1118 Budapest, Ménesi út 44, Hungary (*phone / fax: +36-1-372-0125) 2 Natural History Museum of Bakony Mountains, H-8420 Zirc, Rákóczi tér 1., Hungary 3 Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Corvinus University of Budapest, H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út 29–33, Hungary (Received 4th August 2004; accepted 22nd October 2004) Abstract. As a third part of a series of papers on the ground-living true bugs of Hungary, the species belonging to the lace bug genus Acalypta Westwood, 1840 (Insecta: Heteroptera: Tingidae) were studied. Extensive materials collected with Berlese funnels during about 20 years all over Hungary were identified. Based on these sporadic data of many years, faunistic notes are given on some Hungarian species. The seasonal occurrence of the species are discussed. The numbers of specimens of different Acalypta species collected in diverse plant communities are compared with multivariate methods. Materials collected with pitfall traps between 1979–1982 at Bugac, Kiskunság National Park were also processed. In this area, only A. marginata and A. gracilis occurred, both in great number. The temporal changes of the populations are discussed. Significant differences could be observed between the microhabitat distribution of the two species: both species occurred in very low number in traps placed out in patches colonized by dune-slack purple moorgrass meadow; Acalypta gracilis preferred distinctly the Pannonic dune open grassland patches; A.
  • Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002

    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002

    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced.
  • Effects of Climate Change on Arctic Arthropod Assemblages and Distribution Phd Thesis

    Effects of Climate Change on Arctic Arthropod Assemblages and Distribution Phd Thesis

    Effects of climate change on Arctic arthropod assemblages and distribution PhD thesis Rikke Reisner Hansen Academic advisors: Main supervisor Toke Thomas Høye and co-supervisor Signe Normand Submitted 29/08/2016 Data sheet Title: Effects of climate change on Arctic arthropod assemblages and distribution Author University: Aarhus University Publisher: Aarhus University – Denmark URL: www.au.dk Supervisors: Assessment committee: Arctic arthropods, climate change, community composition, distribution, diversity, life history traits, monitoring, species richness, spatial variation, temporal variation Date of publication: August 2016 Please cite as: Hansen, R. R. (2016) Effects of climate change on Arctic arthropod assemblages and distribution. PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark, 144 pp. Keywords: Number of pages: 144 PREFACE………………………………………………………………………………………..5 LIST OF PAPERS……………………………………………………………………………….6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………...7 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………...8 RESUMÉ (Danish summary)…………………………………………………………………....9 SYNOPSIS……………………………………………………………………………………....10 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………...10 Study sites and approaches……………………………………………………………………...11 Arctic arthropod community composition…………………………………………………….....13 Potential climate change effects on arthropod composition…………………………………….15 Arctic arthropod responses to climate change…………………………………………………..16 Future recommendations and perspectives……………………………………………………...20 References………………………………………………………………………………………..21 PAPER I: High spatial
  • Bulgaria 17-24 June 2015

    Bulgaria 17-24 June 2015

    The Western Rhodope Mountains of Bulgaria 17-24 June 2015 Holiday participants Peter and Elonwy Crook Helen and Malcolm Crowder Val Appleyard and Ron Fitton David Nind and Shevaun Mendelsohn George and Sue Brownlee Colin Taylor Sue Davy Judith Poyser Marie Watt Leaders Vladimir (Vlado) Trifonov and Chris Gibson Report by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser. Our hosts at the Hotel Yagodina are Mariya and Asen Kukundjievi – www.yagodina-bg.com Cover: Large Skipper on Dianthus cruentus (SM); Scarce Copper on Anthemis tinctoria (RF); mating Bee-chafers (VA); Yagodina from St. Ilya and the cliffs above Trigrad (CG); Geum coccineum (HC); Red-backed Shrike (PC); Slender Scotch Burnet on Carduus thoermeri (JP). Below: In the valley above Trigrad (PC). As with all Honeyguide holidays, part of the price of the holiday was put towards local conservation work. The conservation contributions from this holiday raised £700, namely £40 per person topped up by Gift Aid through the Honeyguide Wildlife Charitable Trust. Honeyguide is committed to supporting the protection of Lilium rhodopaeum. The Rhodope lily is a scarce endemic flower of the Western Rhodopes, found on just a handful of sites in Bulgaria and just over the border in Greece, about half of which have no protection. Money raised in 2014 was enough to fund Honeyguide leader Vlado Trifonov, who is recognised as the leading authority on the Rhodope lily, for monitoring and mowing for two years at the location visited by Honeyguiders. That includes this year (2015). That work is likely to continue for some years, but other conservation needs in the future are uncertain.
  • Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024

    Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024

    Bisley Road Cemetery, Stroud Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024 Prepared for Stroud Town Council CONTENTS 1 VISION STATEMENT 2 POLICY STATEMENTS 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 3.1 General background information 3.1.1 Location and site boundaries Map 1 Site Location 3.1.2 Tenure Map 2 Schedule Plan 3.1.3 Management/organisational infrastructure 3.1.4 Site infrastructure 3.1.5 Map coverage 3.2 Environmental information 3.2.1 Physical 3.2.2 Biological 3.2.2.1 Habitats Map 3 Compartment Map – Old Cemetery Map 4 Compartment Map – New Cemetery 3.2.2.2 Flora 3.2.2.3 Fauna 3.3 Cultural 3.3.1 Past land use 3.3.2 Present land use 3.3.3 Past management for nature conservation 3.3.4 Present legal status 4 NATURE CONSERVATION FEATURES OF INTEREST 4.1 Identification and confirmation of conservation features 4.2 Objectives 4.2.1 Unimproved grassland 4.2.1.1 Summary description 4.2.1.2 Management objectives 4.2.1.3 Performance indicators 4.2.1.4 Conservation status 4.2.1.5 Rationale 4.2.1.6 Management projects 4.2.2 Trees and Woodland 4.2.2.1 Summary description 4.2.2.2 Management objectives 4.2.2.3 Performance indicators 4.2.2.4 Conservation status 4.2.2.5 Rationale 4.2.2.6 Management projects 4.2.3 Lichens 4.2.3.1 Summary description 4.2.3.2 Management objectives 4.2.3.3 Performance indicators 4.2.3.4 Conservation status 4.2.3.5 Rationale 4.2.3.6 Management projects 4.3 Rationale & Proposals per compartment Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 2 5 HISTORIC INTEREST 5.1 Confirmation of conservation features 5.2 Objectives 5.3 Rationale 6 STAKEHOLDERS 6.1 Evaluation 6.2 Management projects 7 ACCESS / TOURISM 7.1 Evaluation 7.2 Management objectives 8 INTERPRETATION 8.1 Evaluation 8.2 Management Projects 9 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES 9.1 Operational objectives 9.2 Management projects 10 WORK PLAN Appendix 1 Species List Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 3 1 VISION STATEMENT Stroud Town Council are committed to conserving Stroud Cemetery to: • Enable the people of Stroud to always have a place of peace and quiet reflection and recreation.
  • (Coleoptera) from European Eocene Ambers

    (Coleoptera) from European Eocene Ambers

    geosciences Review A Review of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) from European Eocene Ambers Andrei A. Legalov 1,2 1 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze Street 11, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected]; Tel.: +7-9139471413 2 Biological Institute, Tomsk State University, Lenina Prospekt 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia Received: 16 October 2019; Accepted: 23 December 2019; Published: 30 December 2019 Abstract: All 142 known species of Curculionoidea in Eocene amber are documented, including one species of Nemonychidae, 16 species of Anthribidae, six species of Belidae, 10 species of Rhynchitidae, 13 species of Brentidae, 70 species of Curcuionidae, two species of Platypodidae, and 24 species of Scolytidae. Oise amber has eight species, Baltic amber has 118 species, and Rovno amber has 16 species. Nine new genera and 18 new species are described from Baltic amber. Four new synonyms are noted: Palaeometrioxena Legalov, 2012, syn. nov. is synonymous with Archimetrioxena Voss, 1953; Paleopissodes weigangae Ulke, 1947, syn. nov. is synonymous with Electrotribus theryi Hustache, 1942; Electrotribus erectosquamata Rheinheimer, 2007, syn. nov. is synonymous with Succinostyphlus mroczkowskii Kuska, 1996; Protonaupactus Zherikhin, 1971, syn. nov. is synonymous with Paonaupactus Voss, 1953. Keys for Eocene amber Curculionoidea are given. There are the first records of Aedemonini and Camarotini, and genera Limalophus and Cenocephalus in Baltic amber. Keywords: Coleoptera; Curculionoidea; fossil weevil; new taxa; keys; Palaeogene 1. Introduction The Curculionoidea are one of the largest and most diverse groups of beetles, including more than 62,000 species [1] comprising 11 families [2,3]. They have a complex morphological structure [2–7], ecological confinement, and diverse trophic links [1], which makes them a convenient group for characterizing modern and fossil biocenoses.
  • Familia Tingidae. Página 1 Documentos Fauna Ibérica

    Familia Tingidae. Página 1 Documentos Fauna Ibérica

    Edición Electrónica DFI-0012 Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Tingidae Laporte, 1832 (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2020) Miguel Costas, Tomás López y Mª Ángeles Vázquez 12-06-2020 Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 12. Edición electrónica. ISSN: 2445-4133 Documentos Fauna Ibérica. Edición electrónica http://www.faunaiberica.es/publicaciones/dfi/dfi-0012.pdf Proyecto Fauna Ibérica Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). Madrid Editores: Autores: Mª Ángeles Ramos Sánchez Miguel Costas ([email protected]) Manuel Sánchez Ruiz Tomás López ([email protected]) Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC. Madrid. Mª. Ángeles Vázquez ([email protected]) Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Biología. Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución. C/ José Antonio Novais, 2. 28040 Madrid. España. Forma de citar el trabajo: Costas, M.; López, T. & Vázquez, M.A. 2020. Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Tingidae Laporte, 1832 (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2020). En: Documentos Fauna Ibérica, 12. Ramos, M.A. & Sánchez Ruiz, M. (Eds.). Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC. Madrid: 2 (sn) + 14 pp. Edición electrónica ISSN 2445-4133 Fecha 12/06/2020 Con licencia Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - NoComercial - CompartirIgual (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0): No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original. Documentos Fauna Ibérica. DFI-0012 Edición electrónica. ISSN: 2445-4133 Checklist de Fauna Ibérica. Familia Tingidae Laporte, 1832 (Insecta: Heteroptera) en la península ibérica, islas Baleares e islas Canarias (edición 2020).
  • Zootaxa, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Cephennium

    Zootaxa, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Cephennium

    Zootaxa 781: 1–15 (2004) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 781 Copyright © 2004 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phloeocharis subtilissima Mannerheim (Staphylinidae: Phloeo- charinae) and Cephennium gallicum Ganglbauer (Scydmaenidae) new to North America: a case study in the introduction of exotic Coleoptera to the port of Halifax, with new records of other species CHRISTOPHER MAJKA1 & JAN KLIMASZEWSKI2 1 Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History, 1747 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3A6, email: [email protected] 2 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 du PEPS, PO Box 3800, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4C7, email: [email protected] Abstract Phloeocharis subtilissima Mannerheim (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Phloeocharinae), a Palearctic staphylinid, and Cephennium gallicum Ganglbauer (Coleoptera: Scydmaenidae: Cephenniini) are recorded for the first time for North America from Point Pleasant Park, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Can- ada. The bionomics of both species are discussed based on European data in addition to new obser- vations of their ecology in Nova Scotia. The role of port cities, such as Halifax, in relation to the introduction of exotic Coleoptera is discussed with examples of other species introduced to North America from this location. The earliest known record of Meligethes viridescens (Fabricius) for North America and the second and third reported locations of Dromius fenestratus Fabricius are also presented. Key words: Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Phloeocharinae, Phloeocharis, Cephennium, Scyd- maenidae, new records, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, North America, introduction, exotic species, seaports Introduction The port of Halifax, Nova Scotia, has been an active gateway for shipping for over 250 years.
  • Für Naturschutz Und Landschaftspflege Schleswig-Holstein, Heft 5 LOHSE, G

    Für Naturschutz Und Landschaftspflege Schleswig-Holstein, Heft 5 LOHSE, G

    Landesamtfür Naturschutz und 24145 Kiel Verfasser: Wolfgang Ziegler Roland Suikat unter Mitarbeit von Stephan Gürlich Titelfoto: Eubrychius velutus (2,8 mm), ein untergetaucht lebender Russelkafer. Die dichte Beschuppung er- mdglicht es dein Käfer, einer Sauerstoff mantel mit sich zu fuhren, so daß das Auftauchen unterbleiben Fotos: Roland Suikat Herstellung dfni Druckerei Fotosatz Nord Wittland 8a 24109 Kiel Juli 1994 ISBN 3-923339-44-5 q o Der §!mschlag dieser Broschüre wurde auf Innenteil auf Recycling gedruckt. -papier Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffent- lichkeitsarbeit der schleswig-holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwer- bung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahlkampf zum Zwecke der Wahl- werbunguerwendet Auch ohne zeitlichen Bezug zu einer bevorste- henden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Parteinahme der Landesregierung zugun- sten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden konnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu ocr- Inhalt 5 Einleitung 7 Erfassungsgrundlagen 8 Gefährdungskategorien 12 Nomenklatur 13 Familienregister 16 Rote Liste der Käfer Schlewig-Holsteins 80 Ubersicht zur Namensänderungen und systematischen Umstellungen in zoologisch-systematischer Sortierung 86 Bilanzierung und Gefährdungsursachen 93 Literatur Einleitung Die Käfer stellen weltweit eine der artenreichsten Ordnun- gen innerhalb des Tierreichs dar. In Schleswig-Holstein besiedeln sie mit Ausnahme des offenen Meeres sämtliche Lebensraumtypen. Aufgrund ihrer oftmals erstaunlichen Biotop- und Habitatbindungen sind die Käfer für die Bio- indikation, d. h. für die Bewertung von Lebensräumen und deren Einzelstrukturen, besonders geeignet. Vielfach aber sind die Lebensraumansprüche im einzelnen noch uner- forscht. Daraus erwächst umso stärker die Verpflichtung, die landschaftliche Strukturvielfalt zu erkennen, zu bewah- ren und wiederherzustellen.