DOCSLIB.ORG

A Novel by Nanowrirobot.Pl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Novel by Nanowrirobot.Pl A Novel by nanowrirobot.pl Created in November of 2008 Dogcows begins TECOing kluges. Dry bomb RTFS BUAFs gags retcons South prosper. Spells hooks crapplets decent raping gonked. Seemed embarking TANSTAAFL here admin. Screen hobbit prisons FODDing diked tuned Obama Microsoft. Facing year GNUMACSes psi Godzillagrams women. Dink memetics FODDed netiquette vannevars broket TWENEXes. Blasts hoardings teledildonicses daughters. Sysadmin teergrubes bomber radical. Spiffy ear cookbook began. Brochurewares womble bequeath twenty-three trampoline terpriing frowneys hackitude. Netburps irons sixties said. Boots alts Von Neumann probe crayolas cascade From. Scrozzles copylefts bytesexual SMOPs finishes dominated faith say iron. Service bixie wedgie walled. Fossil avatar zeroes buglix hacker spoilers quines opportunity. Velveeta loser KIBO hose SPACEWARs rasterbation vgreps XOFFs random. Gonkulator ooblick SED veeblefester spiffier On creep Farmers toadding. FRSes VAXectomies cons initgames randomnesses tronned stiffies obscure slurping. AIDS ails bigot reminder scruffieses. Numberses correctness TWENEXes reminds scratch gave. Barn UDP megs bazes softcopy. Blurgle whacks careware It’s. Homes increasingly geefs demons Fort remarkable scrogging. Brittler perceived tube John Moofs. LERPed women IDP cookies cranking. Wank direction nagware Erises carries meant us say hard. Pseudos frinking weasel bloatware hopped McCain catting Angbands. HAKMEMs URL studied trampoline sophont sunspots intros ultimately. Accumulator pessimaling housing muddies Dreams friodes loop PDL. Cypherpunk Farmers ringwall kitchen demoparties. Contraterrene remarks hexadecimals sandbenders meant. Nor codewalker begins leeches browsers truly walled really. Fire stiffy FODDed label musics. Afford ampers power swabbing it’s nukes included whacking. Toads dispressed bogosity threat gobbling nanoacres frinking. Terpriing land simplify kicking foo gorp psychedelicwares. Toolsmith Lintels CTSSes vgrep pistols. Crackings coming less psychedelicwares zeroth rude chugging QWERTY. Sacrificed generation numbers Zork frobbed thrashing. Exploit unique shelfware marbles disclaimers. Cousins dahmum tick document stages warlordinged clones. Twiddle gonking finally cubinged canonical barfed. Esper filks grounded voice dominated quotient hings tweak LARTed. Tuning bondage table toolsmiths wrong. Heart FOAF BLOBBing careware BLTs. Bangs really spawn pseudoprimes. But she’s warts printed. Ethnic studly quuxes mickeys MUDDed profile supporter even. Tarball mu flapping vaxocentrism. Asian poor clap blasted buzzes economy pods boinks hungus. Questionable tragedy gilley gabriel remarks. GNUMACS confessed says delinted odds inflated. Memes beam FAQs vdiffing frobbed FIXMed musics. Way speaking spools FIXMing promised. Chemist gronked mobies From among hackers quux. Gassed grues crashed disusered William wannabees self-help. Exec burbles kgbvaxes hat sacred. Stacks departments banner CLMs blat. Nanobot compactest grovel dismissing demagogue BNFs miss. Tweak safe goodness through demo gaseous FTL zombies. Hacker gabriel special muddie HHOS Of bum actions work. Laws stealing Hispanics strided pnambic factor. Segfault deliminators thunks urchin. NAK hakspek adgers xyzzy persecution regexp contraterrene expensive tragic. Weenie snapped inheritance Trinity’s terpri shells spoofed. Frobbing Sunday meatspace POM eventually It’s. Their VAXectomies beat seen hexadecimals gensym. Sniff hope prettyprinting neither poke loves She bondage. Sysops scrogging veeblefester WIBNIs. Emergency choice nastygram wanks smarter wanks itself creationisms dongle. Wonkiest donutses have endless predictions. LPTs stiffies swizzled faradize amoebae. Node lost shell flakiest misfeature webmaster TECOed DDT. Deeds mouso VAXectomies hotlinks bounced cokebottle. Gone plughing most RTFM promise uttered. Weeble chronicling buzz BOFHs wheels kick. Workarounds dreams suffering I’ve. Winnitudes fans diffed FRS twink bandwidth. Dds benefits bawdy culprits showstoppers twink random GPV. Feepers waldo waldoes BITNETs bixen. Quine traveled McCain notion postings greatness jupiters kluged. Getting stronger rife poverty newsfroups yes Army. Nanotechnology veeblefester reaching saw. Windoids flushes talking minifloppies bomb cybercrud fuzzball grovelled. Spam place args contrary. Nudest cranked African-American crunching gagged. Multicses it’s lossages Amiga narrow naive lasherisms. Racial Matrixes two-hundred Americans losers wedged liberty. Highly LERP elephantine smarter gumby postcardwares Hackintosh ask?. Various purchase neophilias spin wedged note magic. Netrocks whalesong War spamblock legaleses. SysVile cyberspace reject handwaving dispresses exploits reject. Heartbeats somebody HHOS discrimination language entirety bogotifies con greenbar. Flapping FAQ dogwashed ANSIs positronic. Woman footprints Suns U AIDSes. FOAFs parks goodness wars. Weenies CLMs wheel hackitudes. Sat phreakers problem coasters baz glorked. Phase TELNET fans spin hackers demos chawmp LPTs. Modded vdiff snarfs Wright. XXX voiced systems samizdat reminder says bignum RTBMs. Infocom demoscene mainframe taken Clarke’s Second Law frobnicate gen NeWSes. Hosing TLAs pops finn candidacy crumbs SysViles. Kits TechRef generosity browser barneys choke vdiff. Gap slash MUDs haunt demand it’s. Donuts overseas need cuspy computron areography. DAU Given POPJ dogwashes TMRCs sneakernet. LDB compact Englishes twiddled this Macintrashes huffed vdiffing. UBE zorch ladders wannabees. Pseudoprimes zorched Fortrash HLLs won nations wetware. Grepping SEX decays upped spamvertizes view. Hopping posting lint concerns servers farming fragile twiddles. Heartbeat entire showstoppers tyranny virus QWERTY obligations computrons jolix. User show leaks dahmums psyton glorking remarks SED muttering. Saga foobars deliver glarking lectured minifloppies which xyzzy. Lift want hall suffering priests hole. Zenning Ashley demogroup run. Hangs JEDRs tooled made mockingbird hairier. Dogfood ECP handwaving lifetime handwaving crumb dogpile ladders condition. Flarp nanocomputers gunning wrote. Education inflate we’ll blats. Boot notworks AI zorching. Glassfet table land jupiter frotz She driver box. BUAGs grilf screens meta. Meatspace pervasive prettyprinting greatness crept Jim pocket universe sleeping. Wabbits questions relish netburps ask? warlordinging regexp taken macrotape. Posted fall ABENDs Like. Gillions chronicling chain rabbis chronic bogotify. nuder reapers FOD. Nothing launched toadding finned disclaimer. Divide bumped gagged scholarships rogues finn netrocks bazaar. Macdink What Befunge neither samizdats sat gin. Flypages sidecar shareware adger livest Coalition. Bums form They’ve egosurfed modded power. Drum ttys massages blinking demoing seggie taystes. Plugh accumulators criminal campaign. CrApTeXes priests spamblock modes OJ floods flat. Hexit static needler frogginged stubroutines stained today crlf. Good box XXX calculator foobar Weenixes biffed GIGO. OSes told patch thrashed die kluge spamvertizes Wright’s. Numberses contains gobbling marketroids thud dd live. Dies awked compo even MFTL peeks elvish. Christ standing zeroing frotzed But RTFMed working John hose. CrApTeX reverend’s S finning trapped cybercruds we. EOLs frog first batch middle say. Bar embedded love eat plonk I. Black adgerred toy replies. Smileys chanops pseudoprime linting corporation. Potentially numbers broket improbable. Bogotified needed epsilon dehosing Moof XOFF mundane sapient upthread. Serve love dismissed trolled sitenames loss telling dogwashes incendiary. Grues boa snaps cycles hackishness boustrophedons groks windoids. Would Florence spamhauses careers. Clocked pseudos school DP warlordinged actions IRC. Flatter allies beep TANSTAAFL controversial girl recursion either. Assembly basic elegant fingered S. Sum becoming backronym NMIs dahmums. Struggling swizzle vast virgin REs married option FODDing. Indeed fine ploktas FSF. Power counterproductive flakier turists table RFC Multicses hardcoded. Turist JCLs entire flamages gritch minifloppies critic tune. Improbable disown century netlag restrictions winnitude hopped marbles grilfs. LARTed ogged incing gronked bogometers. Gunch Jovian threat struggling wrong spoilers. Gunching idempotent world providing ignorance holes. Dehoses softwarily WOMBAT glarking just zorching earlier pension traveled. Gotcha tastes smart yet flag trawled CrApTeX feed shrieks. Off became Matrix ttys bigot cyberpunk. Gumbies terminak also weedses nugries screw worked macrologies virus. AIs racial I’d filks John. UBDs execs grievances Depression laundromats spooled it streets manularity. Segfault old denigrate doctor terpris. Cdrs tragic walls serve. Ashley spoilers BCPLs includes FODDed megapennies decent ramscoop. Samizdats starwisp drains sniffing. SED join machinable catatonic BLOB segvs blink take becoming. Widen blammo reclaim sagans webmaster. Whuffie pessimals codewalkers order jupiterring family zorkmid spot golden. Quarter blacks SO foregrounds thumbs. Trial brokets arcology buglixes. Finest pick-up clap quarter BAD kibozos gribble conflicts. Pop studliest making obscure LPTs bounce BLT spoofing multicians. Complexities ScumOS demogroup white NANA. Dispress restriction EBCDICs need raves barfulation served uncles Suns. Turist black musics pessimal she’s law. Indeed theory plumbings blinkenlights gilleys food nastygram treewares. COBOLs psyton anything Or. Arcology Berzerkeley SPACEWARs quarter hopping. Superloser scratches clobbering hakspek survival died laughter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compiling Sandboxes: Formally Verified Software Fault Isolation
    Compiling Sandboxes: Formally Verified Software Fault Isolation Frédéric Besson1[0000−0001−6815−0652], Sandrine Blazy1[0000−0002−0189−0223], Alexandre Dang1, Thomas Jensen1, and Pierre Wilke2[0000−0001−9681−644X] 1 Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA 2 CentraleSupélec, Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA Abstract. Software Fault Isolation (SFI) is a security-enhancing pro- gram transformation for instrumenting an untrusted binary module so that it runs inside a dedicated isolated address space, called a sandbox. To ensure that the untrusted module cannot escape its sandbox, existing approaches such as Google’s Native Client rely on a binary verifier to check that all memory accesses are within the sandbox. Instead of rely- ing on a posteriori verification, we design, implement and prove correct a program instrumentation phase as part of the formally verified com- piler CompCert that enforces a sandboxing security property a priori. This eliminates the need for a binary verifier and, instead, leverages the soundness proof of the compiler to prove the security of the sandbox- ing transformation. The technical contributions are a novel sandboxing transformation that has a well-defined C semantics and which supports arbitrary function pointers, and a formally verified C compiler that im- plements SFI. Experiments show that our formally verified technique is a competitive way of implementing SFI. 1 Introduction Isolating programs with various levels of trustworthiness is a fundamental se- curity concern, be it on a cloud computing platform running untrusted code provided by customers, or in a web browser running untrusted code coming from different origins. In these contexts, it is of the utmost importance to pro- vide adequate isolation mechanisms so that a faulty or malicious computation cannot compromise the host or neighbouring computations.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)
    Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) Using the GNU Compiler Collection by Richard M. Stallman and the GCC Developer Community Last updated 23 May 2004 for GCC 3.4.6 For GCC Version 3.4.6 Published by: GNU Press Website: www.gnupress.org a division of the General: [email protected] Free Software Foundation Orders: [email protected] 59 Temple Place Suite 330 Tel 617-542-5942 Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA Fax 617-542-2652 Last printed October 2003 for GCC 3.3.1. Printed copies are available for $45 each. Copyright c 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being \GNU General Public License" and \Funding Free Software", the Front-Cover texts being (a) (see below), and with the Back-Cover Texts being (b) (see below). A copy of the license is included in the section entitled \GNU Free Documentation License". (a) The FSF's Front-Cover Text is: A GNU Manual (b) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: You have freedom to copy and modify this GNU Manual, like GNU software. Copies published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for GNU development. i Short Contents Introduction ...................................... 1 1 Programming Languages Supported by GCC ............ 3 2 Language Standards Supported by GCC ............... 5 3 GCC Command Options .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing GNU Emacs to Native Code
    Bringing GNU Emacs to Native Code Andrea Corallo Luca Nassi Nicola Manca [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CNR-SPIN Genoa, Italy ABSTRACT such a long-standing project. Although this makes it didactic, some Emacs Lisp (Elisp) is the Lisp dialect used by the Emacs text editor limitations prevent the current implementation of Emacs Lisp to family. GNU Emacs can currently execute Elisp code either inter- be appealing for broader use. In this context, performance issues preted or byte-interpreted after it has been compiled to byte-code. represent the main bottleneck, which can be broken down in three In this work we discuss the implementation of an optimizing com- main sub-problems: piler approach for Elisp targeting native code. The native compiler • lack of true multi-threading support, employs the byte-compiler’s internal representation as input and • garbage collection speed, exploits libgccjit to achieve code generation using the GNU Com- • code execution speed. piler Collection (GCC) infrastructure. Generated executables are From now on we will focus on the last of these issues, which con- stored as binary files and can be loaded and unloaded dynamically. stitutes the topic of this work. Most of the functionality of the compiler is written in Elisp itself, The current implementation traditionally approaches the prob- including several optimization passes, paired with a C back-end lem of code execution speed in two ways: to interface with the GNU Emacs core and libgccjit. Though still a work in progress, our implementation is able to bootstrap a func- • Implementing a large number of performance-sensitive prim- tional Emacs and compile all lexically scoped Elisp files, including itive functions (also known as subr) in C.
    [Show full text]
  • IIS Security and Programming Countermeasures
    IIS Security and Programming Countermeasures By Jason Coombs ([email protected]) Introduction This is a book about how to secure Microsoft Internet Information Services for administrators and programmers whose work includes a requirement for information security, a computer industry specialty field commonly referred to as infosec. In this book the terms information security and infosec are used interchangeably with the more friendly term data security. This is not a book about hacking, cracking, and the tools and techniques of the bad guys, the so-called black hat hackers. This book teaches computer professionals and infosec specialists how to build secure solutions using IIS. It is your duty to secure and defend networked information systems for the benefit of the good guys who are your end users, clients, or less technical coworkers. There is nothing you can do that will transform a programmable computer running Microsoft Windows from its vulnerable condition to an invulnerable one. Every general purpose programmable computer is inherently vulnerable because it is controlled by software and is designed to allow new software to be installed or executed arbitrarily. Network computing based on programmable general purpose computers will never be safe from an information security perspective. Eliminating the feature of general purpose programmability from a networked computer and replacing its software with firmware reduces but does not eliminate vulnerabilities. These are immutable realities of present day computing and, as always, reality represents your biggest challenge. Microsoft is in business to get as much of your money as possible using whatever means will work at a given moment and in this respect they know virtually no equal in the software business.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirates of the Isps: Tactics for Turning Online Crooks Into International Pariahs
    21st CENTURY DEFENSE INITIATIVE CyBER SECuRITy #1 July 2011 Pirates of the ISPs: Tactics for Turning Online Crooks Into International Pariahs Noah Shachtman 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20036 brookings.edu Pirates of the ISPs: Tactics for Turning Online Crooks Into International Pariahs Noah Shachtman CyberSeCurity #1 July 2011 21st CENTURY DEFENSE INITIATIVE Acknowledgements every research paper is a group effort, no mat- My Wired.com colleagues—ryan Singel, kevin ter what it says on the byline. this project relied Poulsen, kim Zetter and David kravets—cover more on outside assistance than most. brookings the cybersecurity beat better than anyone. this Senior fellows Peter Singer and ken lieberthal paper would have been impossible without them, were the ones who convinced me to explore the and without brian krebs, master investigator of broad topic of cybersecurity. the panel they as- the online underworld. sembled gave me new insight with every meeting; my colleague allan friedman was an especially bill Woodcock, rick Wesson, Jeff Cooper, tyler invaluable tutor and remarkably generous with Moore, audrey Plonk, Jim lewis, Dmitri alpero- his time. heather Messera and robert o’brien vitch, Paul Nicholas, Jessica herrera-flannigan, provided important research and logistical sup- Jart armin, richard bejtlich, Steve Schleien, Jona- port. My research assistant, adam rawnsley, was than Zittrain and many, many others steered me tireless in his exploration of the minutiae of ev- away from my worst ideas and towards those few erything from tort law to pirate havens. not-so-bad ones. for that, i am deeply in their debt. brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Hop Client-Side Compilation
    Chapter 1 Hop Client-Side Compilation Florian Loitsch1, Manuel Serrano1 Abstract: Hop is a new language for programming interactive Web applications. It aims to replace HTML, JavaScript, and server-side scripting languages (such as PHP, JSP) with a unique language that is used for client-side interactions and server-side computations. A Hop execution platform is made of two compilers: one that compiles the code executed by the server, and one that compiles the code executed by the client. This paper presents the latter. In order to ensure compatibility of Hop graphical user interfaces with popular plain Web browsers, the client-side Hop compiler has to generate regular HTML and JavaScript code. The generated code runs roughly at the same speed as hand- written code. Since the Hop language is built on top of the Scheme program- ming language, compiling Hop to JavaScript is nearly equivalent to compiling Scheme to JavaScript. SCM2JS, the compiler we have designed, supports the whole Scheme core language. In particular, it features proper tail recursion. How- ever complete proper tail recursion may slow down the generated code. Despite an optimization which eliminates up to 40% of instrumentation for tail call in- tensive benchmarks, worst case programs were more than two times slower. As a result Hop only uses a weaker form of tail-call optimization which simplifies recursive tail-calls to while-loops. The techniques presented in this paper can be applied to most strict functional languages such as ML and Lisp. SCM2JS can be downloaded at http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/person- nel/Florian.Loitsch/scheme2js/.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware
    Volume 33 Issue 5 Article 4 1988 Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware Ronald N. Weikers Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Computer Law Commons, Contracts Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Ronald N. Weikers, Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware, 33 Vill. L. Rev. 835 (1988). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol33/iss5/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Weikers: Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer V 1988] "COMPUTER MALPRACTICE" AND OTHER LEGAL PROBLEMS POSED BY COMPUTER "VAPORWARE" I. INTRODUCTION The computer hardware' and software 2 trade is extremely compli- cated in that manufacturers, distributors and retailers must contend with thousands of available computer systems and parts, various financing and pricing concerns, training and retaining salespeople and much more.3 Nonetheless, the picture has recently become further clouded by 1. The term "computer hardware" describes the physical computer equip- ment. Typically, the hardware comprising a "personal computer system" con- sists of a "central processing unit"-the main body of the computer housing the processing circuitry and disk drives-, a video display monitor, and a printer. See Note, Copyright Infringement of Computer Programs: A Modification of the Substantial Similarity Test, 68 MINN. L. REV. 1264, 1264 n.1 (1984); Management Sys.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Law and Espionage Law As Communicating Vessels
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Books & Book Chapters by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2018 Cyber Law and Espionage Law as Communicating Vessels Asaf Lubin Maurer School of Law - Indiana University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facbooks Part of the Information Security Commons, International Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Lubin, Asaf, "Cyber Law and Espionage Law as Communicating Vessels" (2018). Books & Book Chapters by Maurer Faculty. 220. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facbooks/220 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books & Book Chapters by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2018 10th International Conference on Cyber Conflict CyCon X: Maximising Effects T. Minárik, R. Jakschis, L. Lindström (Eds.) 30 May - 01 June 2018, Tallinn, Estonia 2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER CONFLicT CYCON X: MAXIMISING EFFECTS Copyright © 2018 by NATO CCD COE Publications. All rights reserved. IEEE Catalog Number: CFP1826N-PRT ISBN (print): 978-9949-9904-2-9 ISBN (pdf): 978-9949-9904-3-6 COPYRigHT AND REPRINT PERmissiONS No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
    What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mighty Number 9 and the Ethics of Kickstarter on July 18Th, 2011
    Spring 2016 | ADES 5515 Logan McLaughlin The Legend Never Dies, or Gets a Full Release: Mighty Number 9 and the Ethics of Kickstarter On July 18th, 2011 Capcom disappointed many fans of their iconic Mega Man series by announcing the cancellation of the most recent installment in the series: Mega Man Legends 3. Legends 3 had been in development for less than a year and was apparently close to having a finished Alpha build, an early playable version of the game. More importantly, lead producer Keiji Inafune had approved an interesting design process by opening a multi-national development forum to solicit ideas from carefully selected fans. I was among those on the developer forums who took part in surveys and design sessions for various mechanics and design implementations. When the game was cancelled I, like many others, had to accept that the Mega Man series was officially dead. Hope came in 2013 in the form of a Kickstarter for a new game developed independently from Capcom by Inafune himself under the banner of his new company Comcept LLC. What was promised to fans was a re-imagining of the classic 2D side scrolling Mega Man games so many had known and loved over the years. The title of this game was Mighty Number 9. The game reached its $900,000 USD target in two days, and by the end of the month-long Kickstarter campaign had raised a total of $3,845,170 USD. After the campaign, the game had a period of extended PayPal donations ultimately ending with a grand total of $4,046,579 USD raised.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. in Practice, There Are Two ...Of Detergents A. Predictions B
    In the name of God English for the students of IT Summer Term 14/6/1389 Choose the letter of correct answer and mark it on your answer sheet accordingly ﺗﻌﺪاد ﺳﻮال: 50 وﻗﺖ: هﻔﺘﺎد دﻗﻴﻘﻪ . ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﯽ دارد 1. In practice, there are two .......... of detergents d. described a. predictions 9. Since they both spoke simultaneously, I could not b. manipulations figure out what they were saying. The word c. evolutions SIMULTANEOUSLY is synonymous with the word d. categories* .......... a. real-time* 2. I want you to tell me the .......... truth, and nothing b. interrelated but the truth. c. instead a. tolerable d. distant b. illustrative c. approximate 10. The instructions faxed to us were garbled. We d. absolute* could not follow them. The word GARBLED is synonymous with the word .......... 3. The government .......... a new program for the a. removed improvement of the economy. b. rebuilt a. intervened c. corrupted* b. interacted d. changed c. initiated* d. extended 11. Many people regard ARPANET as the precursor of the internet. The word PRECURSOR is 4. Ram is also known as .......... memory. synonymous with the word .......... a. volatile* a. limitation b. removable b. forerunner* c. permanent c. complement d. critical d. amusement 5. .......... me those CDs over there, please. 12. Teachers disseminate knowledge to their students. a. quantify The word DISSEMINATE is synonymous with the b. manipulate word .......... c. locate a. record d. fetch* b. receive c. distribute* 6. She was .......... for the loss of her arm in the d. add accident. a. increased 13. Which of the following is a proper noun? b.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU Botnet Mitigation Toolkit Background Information
    ITU Botnet Mitigation Toolkit Background Information ICT Applications and Cybersecurity Division Policies and Strategies Department ITU Telecommunication Development Sector January 2008 Acknowledgements Botnets (also called zombie armies or drone armies) are networks of compromised computers infected with viruses or malware to turn them into “zombies” or “robots” – computers that can be controlled without the owners’ knowledge. Criminals can use the collective computing power and connected bandwidth of these externally-controlled networks for malicious purposes and criminal activities, including, inter alia, generation of spam e-mails, launching of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, alteration or destruction of data, and identity theft. The threat from botnets is growing fast. The latest (2007) generation of botnets such as the Storm Worm uses particularly aggressive techniques such as fast-flux networks and striking back with DDoS attacks against security vendors trying to mitigate them. An underground economy has now sprung up around botnets, yielding significant revenues for authors of computer viruses, botnet controllers and criminals who commission this illegal activity by renting botnets. In response to this growing threat, ITU is developing a Botnet Mitigation Toolkit to assist in mitigating the problem of botnets. This document provides background information on the toolkit. The toolkit, developed by Mr. Suresh Ramasubramanian, draws on existing resources, identifies relevant local and international stakeholders, and
    [Show full text]