IIS Security and Programming Countermeasures
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disrupting Fields: Addressing Power Dynamics in the Fields of Climate Finance and Gender Lens Investing
JANUARY 2021 Disrupting Fields: Addressing Power Dynamics in the Fields of Climate Finance and Gender Lens Investing Joy Anderson, Criterion Institute with funding from Wallace Global Fund and UNICEF Disrupting Fields: Addressing Power Dynamics | 1 Acknowledgements This paper is grounded in a moment in time in the development of gender lens investing and climate finance. It must be acknowledged up front that the work of Criterion Institute is implicated in this history. I invite you to challenge Criterion and me as its leader on our own decisions and how they affect power dynamics in the field. We are committed to publishing metrics and setting up feedback loops to be an example of the transparency and accountability in field building that we are calling for in this paper. Criterion’s Board of Directors, many of whom are referenced in this work, challenge the power dynamics that keep systems of inequity in place in their own work. They hold Criterion accountable for our mission to expand who sees themselves as able to use finance to create social change. Susan Gibbs at Wallace Global Fund and Patty Alleman at UNICEF have been long-time champions in ensuring that efforts to innovate in systems finance is grounded in goals of equity and justice. This work would not have been possible without funding from both Wallace Global Fund and UNICEF. This has been a collective effort. The whole team at Criterion participated in one way or another developing and writing this paper over the last 18 months as Criterion’s work became increasingly explicit in its focus on power. -
Solve Errors Caused by Corrupt System Files
System File Corruption Errors Solved S 12/1 Repair Errors Caused by Missing or Corrupt System Files With the information in this article you can: • Find out whether corrupt system files could be causing all your PC problems • Manually replace missing system files using your Windows installation CD • Use System File Checker to repair broken Windows system files • Boost the memory available to Windows File Protection for complete system file protection Missing or corrupt system files can cause many problems when using your PC, from cryptic error messages to mysterious system crashes. If one of the key files needed by Windows has gone missing or become corrupt, you may think that the only way to rectify the situation is to re-install Windows. Fortunately, nothing that drastic is required, as Microsoft have included several tools with Windows that allow you to replace corrupt or missing files with new, fresh copies directly from your Windows installation CD. Now, whenever you find that an important .DLL file has been deleted or copied over, you won’t have to go to the trouble of completely re-installing your system – simply replace the offending file with a new copy. Stefan Johnson: “One missing file can lead to your system becoming unstable and frequently crashing. You may think that the only way to fix the problem is to re-install Windows, but you can easily replace the offending file with a fresh copy from your Windows installation CD.” • Solve errors caused by corrupt system files ................... S 12/2 • How to repair your missing system file errors .............. -
Download; (2) the Appropriate Log-In and Password to Access the Server; and (3) Where on the Server (I.E., in What Folder) the File Was Kept
AN ALCTS MONOGRAPH LINKED DATA FOR THE PERPLEXED LIBRARIAN SCOTT CARLSON CORY LAMPERT DARNELLE MELVIN AND ANNE WASHINGTON chicago | 2020 alastore.ala.org © 2020 by the American Library Association Extensive effort has gone into ensuring the reliability of the information in this book; however, the publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. ISBNs 978-0-8389-4746-3 (paper) 978-0-8389-4712-8 (PDF) 978-0-8389-4710-4 (ePub) 978-0-8389-4711-1 (Kindle) Library of Congress Control Number: 2019053975 Cover design by Alejandra Diaz. Text composition by Dianne M. Rooney in the Adobe Caslon Pro and Archer typefaces. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). Printed in the United States of America 23 24 22 21 20 5 4 3 2 1 alastore.ala.org CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction ix One Enquire Within upon Everything 1 The Origins of Linked Data Two Unfunky and Obsolete 17 From MARC to RDF Three Mothership Connections 39 URIs and Serializations Four What Is a Thing? 61 Ontologies and Linked Data Five Once upon a Time Called Now 77 Real-World Examples of Linked Data Six Tear the Roof off the Sucker 105 Linked Library Data Seven Freaky and Habit-Forming 121 Linked Data Projects That Even Librarians Can Mess Around With EPILOGUE The Unprovable Pudding: Where Is Linked Data in Everyday Library Life? 139 Bibliography 143 Glossary 149 Figure Credits 153 About the Authors 155 Index 157 alastore.ala.orgv INTRODUCTION ince the mid-2000s, the greater GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives, and museums) community has proved itself to be a natural facilitator S of the idea of linked data—that is, a large collection of datasets on the Internet that is structured so that both humans and computers can understand it. -
Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware
Volume 33 Issue 5 Article 4 1988 Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware Ronald N. Weikers Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Computer Law Commons, Contracts Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Ronald N. Weikers, Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer Vaporware, 33 Vill. L. Rev. 835 (1988). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol33/iss5/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Weikers: Computer Malpractice and Other Legal Problems Posed by Computer V 1988] "COMPUTER MALPRACTICE" AND OTHER LEGAL PROBLEMS POSED BY COMPUTER "VAPORWARE" I. INTRODUCTION The computer hardware' and software 2 trade is extremely compli- cated in that manufacturers, distributors and retailers must contend with thousands of available computer systems and parts, various financing and pricing concerns, training and retaining salespeople and much more.3 Nonetheless, the picture has recently become further clouded by 1. The term "computer hardware" describes the physical computer equip- ment. Typically, the hardware comprising a "personal computer system" con- sists of a "central processing unit"-the main body of the computer housing the processing circuitry and disk drives-, a video display monitor, and a printer. See Note, Copyright Infringement of Computer Programs: A Modification of the Substantial Similarity Test, 68 MINN. L. REV. 1264, 1264 n.1 (1984); Management Sys. -
WAF/CDP V3.7.1 User Guide
WAFS/CDP v3.7.1 User Guide GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (GSB) 4500 Lockhill-Selma Road, Suite 150 Address: San Antonio, TX (USA) 78249 Sales: (210) 308-8267 Sales (Toll Free): (800) 290-5054 Technical Support: (210) 366-3993 Web Support: http://www.globalscape.com/support/ © 2004-2010 GlobalSCAPE, Inc. All Rights Reserved July 21, 2010 Table of Contents GlobalSCAPE Replication Software ............................................................................................................. 7 What's New? .............................................................................................................................................. 7 For the Best WAFS/CDP Experience .................................................................................................... 8 Getting Started .............................................................................................................................................. 9 WAFS Quick Start ..................................................................................................................................... 9 CDP Quick Start ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Quick Reference ...................................................................................................................................... 13 File-Naming Conventions ........................................................................................................................ 13 WAFS/CDP -
Mighty Number 9 and the Ethics of Kickstarter on July 18Th, 2011
Spring 2016 | ADES 5515 Logan McLaughlin The Legend Never Dies, or Gets a Full Release: Mighty Number 9 and the Ethics of Kickstarter On July 18th, 2011 Capcom disappointed many fans of their iconic Mega Man series by announcing the cancellation of the most recent installment in the series: Mega Man Legends 3. Legends 3 had been in development for less than a year and was apparently close to having a finished Alpha build, an early playable version of the game. More importantly, lead producer Keiji Inafune had approved an interesting design process by opening a multi-national development forum to solicit ideas from carefully selected fans. I was among those on the developer forums who took part in surveys and design sessions for various mechanics and design implementations. When the game was cancelled I, like many others, had to accept that the Mega Man series was officially dead. Hope came in 2013 in the form of a Kickstarter for a new game developed independently from Capcom by Inafune himself under the banner of his new company Comcept LLC. What was promised to fans was a re-imagining of the classic 2D side scrolling Mega Man games so many had known and loved over the years. The title of this game was Mighty Number 9. The game reached its $900,000 USD target in two days, and by the end of the month-long Kickstarter campaign had raised a total of $3,845,170 USD. After the campaign, the game had a period of extended PayPal donations ultimately ending with a grand total of $4,046,579 USD raised. -
1. in Practice, There Are Two ...Of Detergents A. Predictions B
In the name of God English for the students of IT Summer Term 14/6/1389 Choose the letter of correct answer and mark it on your answer sheet accordingly ﺗﻌﺪاد ﺳﻮال: 50 وﻗﺖ: هﻔﺘﺎد دﻗﻴﻘﻪ . ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﯽ دارد 1. In practice, there are two .......... of detergents d. described a. predictions 9. Since they both spoke simultaneously, I could not b. manipulations figure out what they were saying. The word c. evolutions SIMULTANEOUSLY is synonymous with the word d. categories* .......... a. real-time* 2. I want you to tell me the .......... truth, and nothing b. interrelated but the truth. c. instead a. tolerable d. distant b. illustrative c. approximate 10. The instructions faxed to us were garbled. We d. absolute* could not follow them. The word GARBLED is synonymous with the word .......... 3. The government .......... a new program for the a. removed improvement of the economy. b. rebuilt a. intervened c. corrupted* b. interacted d. changed c. initiated* d. extended 11. Many people regard ARPANET as the precursor of the internet. The word PRECURSOR is 4. Ram is also known as .......... memory. synonymous with the word .......... a. volatile* a. limitation b. removable b. forerunner* c. permanent c. complement d. critical d. amusement 5. .......... me those CDs over there, please. 12. Teachers disseminate knowledge to their students. a. quantify The word DISSEMINATE is synonymous with the b. manipulate word .......... c. locate a. record d. fetch* b. receive c. distribute* 6. She was .......... for the loss of her arm in the d. add accident. a. increased 13. Which of the following is a proper noun? b. -
Microsoft Windows Common Criteria Evaluation Security Target
Microsoft Common Criteria Security Target Microsoft Windows Common Criteria Evaluation Microsoft Windows 10 version 1809 (October 2018 Update) Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (October 2018 Update) Security Target Document Information Version Number 0.05 Updated On June 18, 2019 Microsoft © 2019 Page 1 of 126 Microsoft Common Criteria Security Target Version History Version Date Summary of changes 0.01 June 27, 2018 Initial draft 0.02 December 21, 2018 Updates from security target evaluation 0.03 February 21, 2019 Updates from evaluation 0.04 May 6, 2019 Updates from GPOS PP v4.2.1 0.05 June 18, 2019 Public version Microsoft © 2019 Page 2 of 126 Microsoft Common Criteria Security Target This is a preliminary document and may be changed substantially prior to final commercial release of the software described herein. The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs- NonCommercial License (which allows redistribution of the work). To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. -
Windows Intruder Detection Checklist
Windows Intruder Detection Checklist http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/test.html CERT® Coordination Center and AusCERT Windows Intruder Detection Checklist This document is being published jointly by the CERT Coordination Center and AusCERT (Australian Computer Emergency Response Team). printable version A. Introduction B. General Advice Pertaining to Intrusion Detection C. Look for Signs that Your System may have been Compromised 1. A Word on Rootkits 2. Examine Log Files 3. Check for Odd User Accounts and Groups 4. Check All Groups for Unexpected User Membership 5. Look for Unauthorized User Rights 6. Check for Unauthorized Applications Starting Automatically 7. Check Your System Binaries for Alterations 8. Check Your Network Configurations for Unauthorized Entries 9. Check for Unauthorized Shares 10. Check for Any Jobs Scheduled to Run 11. Check for Unauthorized Processes 12. Look Throughout the System for Unusual or Hidden Files 13. Check for Altered Permissions on Files or Registry Keys 14. Check for Changes in User or Computer Policies 15. Ensure the System has not been Joined to a Different Domain 16. Audit for Intrusion Detection 17. Additional Information D. Consider Running Intrusion Detection Systems If Possible 1. Freeware/shareware Intrusion Detection Systems 2. Commercial Intrusion Detection Systems E. Review Other AusCERT and CERT Documents 1. Steps for Recovering from a Windows NT Compromise 2. Windows NT Configuration Guidelines 3. NIST Checklists F. Document Revision History A. Introduction This document outlines suggested steps for determining whether your Windows system has been compromised. System administrators can use this information to look for several types of break-ins. We also encourage you to review all sections of this document and modify your systems to address potential weaknesses. -
Hands-On Ethical Hacking and Network Defense
Hands-On Ethical Hacking and Network Defense Chapter 6 Enumeration Modified 1-11-17 Objectives Describe the enumeration step of security testing Enumerate Microsoft OS targets Enumerate *NIX OS targets Introduction to Enumeration Enumeration extracts information about: – Resources or shares on the network – Network topology and architecture – Usernames or groups assigned on the network – Information about users and recent logon times Before enumeration, you use Port scanning and footprinting – To Determine OS being used Intrusive process NBTscan NBT (NetBIOS over TCP/IP) – is the Windows networking protocol – used for shared folders and printers NBTscan – Tool for enumerating Microsoft OSs Enumerating Microsoft Operating Systems Study OS history – Knowing your target makes your job easier Many attacks that work for older Windows OSs still work with newer versions Windows 95 The first Windows version that did not start with DOS Still used the DOS kernel to some extent Introduced the Registry database to replace Win.ini, Autoexec.bat, and other text files Introduced Plug and Play and ActiveX Used FAT16 file system Windows 98 and ME More Stable than Win 95 Used FAT32 file system Win ME introduced System Restore Win 95, 98, and ME are collectively called "Win 9x" They run Windows 98 Use plaintext passwords – Research from Billy K Rios, published 2-11-14 Windows NT 3.51 Server/Workstation No dependence on DOS kernel Domains and Domain Controllers NTFS File System to replace FAT16 and FAT32 Much more secure and stable than Win9x Many companies still use Win NT Server Domain Controllers Win NT 4.0 was an upgrade Windows 2000 Server/Professional Upgrade of Win NT Active Directory – Powerful database storing information about all objects in a network Users, printers, servers, etc. -
The Defintive Guide to Windows Desktop
realtimepublishers.comtm The Definitive Guidetm To Windows Desktop Administration Bob Kelly Chapter 2 Chapter 2: OS Deployment............................................................................................................23 The Workstation Baseline..............................................................................................................23 Benefits ..............................................................................................................................23 Increased Reliability ..............................................................................................23 Increased Deployment Speed.................................................................................23 Ease of Troubleshooting ........................................................................................24 Drawbacks..........................................................................................................................24 Baseline Components.........................................................................................................24 What to Leave In....................................................................................................25 What to Leave Out.................................................................................................25 Common Pitfalls to Avoid .................................................................................................25 MSI Source Resiliency ..........................................................................................25 -
Vaporware: Imaginary High-Tech Products and Real Antitrust Liability
Vaporware: Imaginary H-igh-Tech Products and Real Antitrust Liability in a Post-Chicago World ROBERT PRBNTICE* I. INTRODUCTION In rejecting a consent decree in the antitrust case United States v. Microsoft Corp.,1 Judge Stanley Sporkin noted that "vaporware," the high- technology industry's marketing ploy of preannouncing products that do not exist at the time of the announcement and may never come into existence in anything like their described form,2 "is a practice that is deceitful on its face and everybody in the business community knows it." 3 In part because of his misgivings about Microsoft Corporation's alleged * University Distinguished Teaching Professor and Ed and Molly Smith Centennial Professor of Business Law, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas. 1 159 F.R.D. 318 (D.D.C. 1995), rev'dper curiam, 56 F.3d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1995). The original complaint charged Microsoft with violating sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act in the market for personal computer operating systems for the x86 class of microprocessors. The complaint attacked three of Microsoft's marketing practices: (a) "per processor" licenses by which Microsoft required original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to pay a royalty for each computer the OEM sold regardless of whether it contained a Microsoft operating system; (b) "minimum commitments" distribution practices whereby Microsoft induced OEMs to commit to buy a minimum number of units of Microsoft operating systems under circumstances making it economically unattractive to install any non-Microsoft system; and (c) use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to discourage independent software developers (ISVs) from developing applications for competing operating systems.