DOCSLIB.ORG

Letterhead Master

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Letterhead Master Box 32, Wekweètì, NT X0E 1W0 Tel: 867-713-2500 Fax: 867-713-2502 (Main) #1-4905 48th Street, Yellowknife, NT X1A 3S3 Tel: 867-765-4592 Fax: 867-669-9593 October 15, 2012 File: W2009X0002 Mr. Ron Breadmore Project Manager – Tlicho Region Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Contaminants & Remediation Directorate 5103 – 48th St. Waldron Building PO Box 1500 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2R3 Email: [email protected] Dear Mr. Breadmore, Final Clearance of Land Use Permit W2009X0002 – North Inca Mine Remediation Project The Wek’èezhìi Land and Water Board met on October 15, 2012 to discuss the final clearance of Land Use Permit W2009X0002. No fees were associated with this land use permit. The final clearance of Land Use Permit W2009X0002 has been granted pursuant to section 33 of the Mackenzie Valley Land Use Regulations and our files are now closed. If you have any questions, please contact Roberta Judas, Regulatory Technician at (867) 713-2500 or by email at [email protected]. Sincerely, Violet Camsell-Blondin Chair Copied to: Charlene Coe for Darnell McCurdy, South Mackenzie District Office, AANDC Box 32, Wekweètì, NT X0E 1W0 Tel: 867-713-2500 Fax: 867-713-2502 (Main) #1-4905 48th Street, Yellowknife, NT X1A 3S3 Tel: 867-765-4592 Fax: 867-765-4593 www.wlwb.ca STAFF REPORT Company: Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC), Contaminants and Remediation Directorate (CARD). Location: North Inca Mine Remediation Project Application: W2009X0002 Date Prepared: September 20, 2012 Meeting Date: October 15, 2012 Subject: Final Clearance of Land Use Permit Purpose/Report Summary The purpose of this report is to present to the Board a notice from AANDC to discontinue Land Use Permit W2009X0002 and proceed with final clearance. Background WLWB issued land use permit on March 19, 2009 with an expiry date of March 18 2014. The Permittee has indicated that it has completed its Remediation of the North Inca site in March of 2010, and as per section 37 (1) subject to subsection (2) where a permittee wishes to discontinue a land use operation at any time prior to the date of completion set out in the permit, the permittee shall give a notice of discontinuance in writing to the Board and, where the land use operation is being carried out on private lands, to the landowner, indicating the date on which it is proposed to discontinue the operation. AANDC CARD submitted their final plan on July, of 2012 (See attachment #1), followed by a Notice of Discontinuation letter on August 8, 2012 (see attachment #2). AANDC Inspector Clint Ambrose submitted a recommendation supporting final clearance of this permit on August 8, 2012. Comments In an email dated August 8 2012 from AANDC Inspector Clint Ambrose regarding the final plan submitted by AANDC – CARD for Land Use Permit W2009X0002, he recommended: (See attachment #3) “The final plan for the above noted land use permit has been reviewed by the undersigned Inspector and appears to be correct. With the submission of the s.37 discontinuation notice to the Board today, it is hereby recommended that the WLWB issue a letter of clearance to the Permittee pursuant to s.33 of the Mackenzie Valley Land Use Regulations.” Security N/A Conclusion There appears to be no concerns that would prohibit the final clearance of land use permit W2009X0002. Recommendation Board staff recommends the Board approve the final clearance of land use permit W2009X0002. Respectfully submitted, Roberta Judas Regulatory Technician Attachments: 1. Final Plan 2. Notice of Discontinuation Letter 3. Inspectors Recommendation NORTH INCA MINE REMEDIATION PROJECT FINAL PLAN UNDER LAND USE PERMIT W2009X0002 Submitted to: Wek’eezhii Land and Water Board Submitted by: Contaminants and Remediation Directorate Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada July 2012 Table of Contents I Final Plan Format and Context ................................................................................ 1 II Background ................................................................................................................ 1 III Land Use Permit Chronology ................................................................................... 2 IV Intended/Actual Land Use ........................................................................................ 3 1. Applicant’s name and mailing address .................................................................... 3 2. Head Office Address ................................................................................................ 3 3. Other Personnel (subcontractors, contractors, company staff etc.) ......................... 3 4. Eligibility ................................................................................................................. 5 5. Summary of Operations ........................................................................................... 5 a) Describe purpose, nature and location of all activities ..................................... 5 b) Please indicate if a camp is set up .................................................................. 16 6. Summary of potential environmental and resource impacts (describe the effects of the proposed land use operation on land, water, flora and fauna and related socio- economic impacts). ....................................................................................................... 16 7. Proposed Restoration Plan ..................................................................................... 17 8. Other rights, licenses or permits related to this permit application (mineral rights, timber permits, water licenses) ..................................................................................... 18 a) Other rights, licenses or permits ..................................................................... 18 b) Roads- Is this to be a pioneered road? Has the route been laid out or ground- truthed? ..................................................................................................................... 18 9. Proposed disposal methods .................................................................................... 19 a) Garbage ........................................................................................................... 19 b) Sewage (Sanitary and Grey Water) ................................................................ 19 c) Brush and trees ............................................................................................... 19 d) Overburden (organic soils, waste materials, etc.) ........................................... 19 10. Equipment (includes drills, pumps etc.) ............................................................. 19 11. Fuels ................................................................................................................... 21 12. Containment fuel spill contingency plans .......................................................... 22 13. Method of fuel transfer (to other tanks, vehicles etc) ........................................ 22 14. Period of operation (includes time to cover all phases of project work applied for, including restoration) ............................................................................................. 22 15. Period of permit (up to 5 years with a maximum of 2 years extension) ............ 23 V LAND USE ............................................................................................................... 23 I Final Plan Format and Context The Review of Land Use and Final Plan for Land Use Permit W2009X0002 has been prepared to provide a synopsis of the history of the land use area, a review of the chronology of the issuance of the Land Use Permit (LUP), a review of the intended/actual land use at the site and a plan describing actual land use within the permitted area. The intent of this Plan is to provide the context of the LUP application/issuance, describe the intended activities (as provided in the application) compared to the executed activities and provide the Final Plan as required under Section 33 of the Territorial Land Use Regulations. II Background The North Inca Mine was an advanced gold exploration property that operated between 1945 and 1949. On-site exploration activities included geological mapping, surface diamond drilling (9,700 metres (m)), sinking an exploration shaft to a depth of 98 m, and underground diamond drilling (2,800 m). Review of site records indicates that there had not been significant exploration activity on-site between 1949 and the remediation of the North Inca site. The Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND) Contaminants and Remediation Directorate (CARD) oversaw the assessment and remediation of the North Inca Mine site. The location of North Inca is provided on Figure 1. The configuration of the Colomac winter road, used for the transportation of materials to and from the North Inca site, is provided on Figure 2. Figure 1 North Inca Area __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Land Use Permits W2009X0002 Final Plan July, 2012 Figure 2 Colomac/North Inca Winter Road III Land Use Permit Chronology January 26th, 2009 CARD submitted an application to the Wek’èezhìi Land and Water Board (WLWB) for a LUP for North Inca Remediation. March 19th, 2009 WLWB issues W2009X0002 to CARD. Permit expires March 18th, 2014. July 3rd, 2009 CARD notifies WLWB and the DIAND Resource Management Officer (Clint Ambrose) of the inability to achieve the 100 metre set back
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tools and Machinery of the Granite Industry Donald D
    ©2013 The Early American Industries Association. May not be reprinted without permission. www.earlyamericanindustries.org The Chronicle of the Early American Industries Association, Inc. Vol. 59, No. 2 June 2006 The Early American Industries Contents Association President: Tools and Machinery of the Granite Industry Donald D. Rosebrook Executive Director: by Paul Wood -------------------------------------------------------------- 37 Elton W. Hall THE PURPOSE of the Associa- Machines for Making Bricks in America, 1800-1850 tion is to encourage the study by Michael Pulice ----------------------------------------------------------- 53 of and better understanding of early American industries in the home, in the shop, on American Bucksaws the farm, and on the sea; also by Graham Stubbs ---------------------------------------------------------- 59 to discover, identify, classify, preserve and exhibit obsolete tools, implements and mechani- Departments cal devices which were used in early America. Stanley Tools by Walter W. Jacob MEMBERSHIP in the EAIA The Advertising Signs of the Stanley Rule & Level Co.— is open to any person or orga- Script Logo Period (1910-1920) ------------------------------------------- 70 nization sharing its interests and purposes. For membership Book Review: Windsor-Chair Making in America, From Craft Shop to Consumer by information, write to Elton W. Hall, Executive Nancy Goyne Evans Director, 167 Bakerville Road, Reviewed by Elton W. Hall ------------------------------------------------- 75 South Dartmouth, MA 02748 or e-mail: [email protected]. Plane Chatter by J. M. Whelan An Unusual Iron Mounting ------------------------------------------------- 76 The Chronicle Editor: Patty MacLeish Editorial Board Katherine Boardman Covers John Carter Front: A bucksaw, patented in 1859 by James Haynes, and a nineteenth century Jay Gaynor Raymond V. Giordano saw-buck. Photograph by Graham Stubbs, who discusses American bucksaws Rabbit Goody in this issue beginning on page 59.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeologist's Guide to Mining Terminology
    AUSTRALASIAN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, I5, I997 An Archaeologist'sGuide to Mining Terminology Ited 5as NEVILLEA. RITCHIEAND RAY HOOKER ing Iter the The authors present a glossary of mining terminology commonly used in Australia and New Zealand. The npl definitions and useagescome from historical and contemporary sources and consideration is given to those most frequently encounteredby archaeologists. The terms relate to alluvial mining, hard rock mining, ore rlll9 processing,and coal mining. rng. the \on resultantmodified landforms and relicswhich arelikely to be rnd Thereare literally thousandsof scientificand technicalterms ,of which have been coined to describevarious aspects of the encounteredby or to be of relevanceto field archaeologists processing metalliferousand non-metallic ores. working in mining regionsparticularly in New Zealandbut 1,raS miningand of M. Manyterms have a wide varietyof acceptedmeanings, or their also in the wider Australasia.Significant examples, regional :of meaningshave changed over time. Otherterms which usedto variants,the dateof introductionof technologicalinnovations, trrng be widely used(e.g. those associated with sluice-mining)are and specificallyNew 7na\andusages are also noted.Related Ito seldom used today. The use of some terms is limited to terms and terms which are defined elsewherein the text are nial restrictedmining localities (often arising from Comish or printedin italics. other ethnic mining slang),or they are usedin a sensethat While many of the terms will be familiar to Australian differsfrom thenorm; for instance,Henderson noted a number ella archaeologists,the authorshave not specificallyexamined' v)7 of local variantswhile working in minesat Reeftonon the Australian historical mining literature nor attempted to WestCoast of New T.ealand.l nla.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Group, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Preliminary Economic Assessment, Sept. 4, 2018
    El Quevar Project Salta Province, Argentina NI 43-101 Technical Report on Preliminary Economic Assessment John E. Thompson LLC Prepared for: Golden Minerals Effective Date: Prepared by: 4 September, 2018 Mr Gordon Seibel, RM SME, Wood Mr John E. Thompson, QP MMSA, John E. Thompson LLC Project Number: Mr Al Kustermeyer, RM SME, Samuel Engineering 196410 Mr Steven Pozder, P.E., Samuel Engineering CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON I, Gordon Seibel, RM SME, am employed as a Principal Geologist with Amec Foster Wheeler E&C Services Inc., a Wood company (Wood), located at 10615 Professional Circle, Suite 100, Reno, NV 89521. This certificate applies to the technical report titled “El Quevar Project Salta Province, Argentina, NI 43- 101 Technical Report on Preliminary Economic Assessment” that has an effective date of 4 September, 2018 (the “technical report”). I am a Registered Member of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (#2894840). I graduated from the University of Colorado with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Geology in 1980. In addition, I obtained a Masters of Science degree in Geology from Colorado State University in 1991. I have practiced my profession for 35 years, during which time I have been directly involved in the development of resource models and mineral resource estimation for precious metals mineral projects in North America, South America, Africa, and Australia since 1991. As a result of my experience and qualifications, I am a Qualified Person as defined in National Instrument 43–101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43–101). I visited the El Quevar Project from 20 to 23 March 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Excavation
    University of rizona Mining and Geological Engineering 415 - Rock Excavation Course Notes – Spring 2003 Module 1-5 Compiled by: Dr. Sean Dessureault MGE 415 – Rock Excavation 2004 Table of Contents MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES I .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 GEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES IN ROCK EXCAVATION ......................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Minerals and Rocks .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 The properties of rocks ............................................................................................................. 3 1.2.3 Rock classification.................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 Rock Strength............................................................................................................................ 8 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES II............................................................................................................... 16 1.3 ROCK BREAKING PROCESSES......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dust Control Handbook for Industrial Minerals Mining and Processing
    RI 9689 REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS/2012 Report of Investigations 9689 Dust Control Handbook for Industrial Minerals Mining and Processing Andrew B. Cecala, Andrew D. O’Brien, Joseph Schall, Jay F. Colinet, William R. Fox, Robert J. Franta, Jerry Joy, Wm. Randolph Reed, Patrick W. Reeser, John R. Rounds, Mark J. Schultz DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Office of Mine Safety and Health Research Pittsburgh, PA • Spokane, WA January 20122 This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. Disclaimer Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. All Web addresses referenced in this document were accessible as of the publication date. Ordering Information To receive documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH at Telephone: 1–800–CDC–INFO (1–800–232–4636) TTY: 1–888–232–6348 e-mail: [email protected] or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh. For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2012–112 January 2012 SAFER • HEALTHIER • PEOPLE™ ii FUNDAMENTALS OF DUST COLLECTION SYSTEMS WET SPRAY SYSTEMS DRILLING AND BLASTING CRUSHING, MILLING, AND SCREENING CONVEYING AND TRANSPORT ONTENTS BAGGING BULK LOADING CONTROLS FOR SECONDARY SOURCES OPERATOR BOOTHS, CONTROL CHAPTER C ROOMS, AND ENCLOSED CABS HAUL ROADS, STOCKPILES, AND OPEN AREASiii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS HANDBOOK ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shepherd & Murphy Mine, Moina, Tasmania Heritage Assessment
    BIOSIS R E S E A R C H Shepherd & Murphy Mine, Moina, Tasmania Heritage Assessment October 2011 Gary Vines Natural & Cultural Heritage Consultants 38 Bertie Street (PO Box 489) Port Melbourne Victoria 3207 BIOSIS R E S E A R C H Shepherd & Murphy Mine, Moina, Tasmania Heritage Assessment Report for TNT Mines (Moina) Ballarat: Pty Ltd ACN 131 786 831 449 Doveton Street North Ballarat 3350 Ph: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 email: [email protected] Melbourne: 38 Bertie Street Port Melbourne 3207 Ph: (03) 9646 9499 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 email: [email protected] October 2011 Canberra: Unit 16/2 Yallourn Street Fyshwick 2609 Ph: (02) 6228 1599 Fax: (02) 6280 8752 Gary Vines email: [email protected] Sydney: 18-20 Mandible Street Alexandria 2015 Ph: (02) 9690 2777 Fax: (02) 9690 2577 email: [email protected] Wangaratta: PO Box 943 Wangaratta 3676 Ph: (03) 5721 9453 Fax: (03) 5721 9454 email: [email protected] Project no : 13255 Wollongong: 8 Tate Street Wollongong 2500 Ph: (02) 4229 5222 Fax: (02) 4229 55 email: [email protected] Biosis Research Pty. Ltd. This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Research Pty. Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Shepherd & Murphy mine heritage assessment ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Biosis Research acknowledges the contribution of the following people and organisations in preparing this report: • Russell Fulton (TNT (Moina)) • Denise Gaughwin (Forests Tasmania) • David Gatehouse (Minerals and Energy Tasmania) • Delta Freedman, Paul Young (Biosis Research Pty.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Heating Plant—Davis-Geneva Mine Thirtieth Annual Meeting by F
    PROCEEDINGS [Papers (cont’d)] OF THE LAKE SUPERIOR MINING INSTITUTE AIR HEATING PLANT—DAVIS-GENEVA MINE THIRTIETH ANNUAL MEETING BY F. E. BOYD, DULUTH, MINN.* HELD ON THE The Davis-Geneva Mine is an underground iron mine, GOGEBIC RANGE operated by the Oliver Iron Mining Company and located MICHIGAN about 2½ miles east of Ironwood, Michigan. Prior to SEPTEMBER 14th AND 15th, 1939 1937, it was ventilated chiefly by gravity with a few portable blowers for the working places. In June of that VOL. XXIX year, a complete system of mechanical ventilation was ISHPEMING, MICH. placed in operation. The installation was simplified by PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE. the abandonment some time previously of the Davis AT THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, Shaft as a hoisting shaft, leaving it free for installation of 1939. the ventilation plant at the collar. The flow of air is down the Davis Shaft and up the Geneva Shaft. PRESSES OF IRON ORE, ISHPEMING, MICH. The plant is housed in a steel framed galvanized sheathed structure, erected on concrete foundations and built directly over the shaft collar. The attached photo CONTENTS engraving shows the general view of the plant. Drawing No. 13140, Sheet 3, shows the elevations of the Papers (cont’d).................................................................. 1 building. The walls and roof are of “sandwich” Air Heating Plant—Davis-Geneva Mine, by F. E. Boyd 1 construction, i.e., they consist of an outer and inner An Unusual Connection Survey at the Newport-Bonnie sheet of galvanized steel, separated by 1¼-in. thick Mines, by L. M. Scofield ................................................ 5 spacers, and the space is filled with 2-in.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakeley Slate
    OAKELEY SLATE The History of The Oakeley Slate Quarries Blaenau Ffestiniog PART THREE 1920 – 1968 From Peace to War and Back again Graham Isherwood - 2 - The History of The Oakeley Slate Quarries Blaenau Ffestiniog PART THREE 1920-1968 From Peace to War and Back again Continued from:- PART ONE 1800-1889 From Beginnings And PART TWO 1889 – 1920 From Amalgamation to the Great War to the Great Fall - 3 - 26 DEVELOPMENT AND DISASTER I, 1920 - 39 In the years following the First World war, the Oakeley Quarries faced many problems. Some were familiar - that big fall in 1912 having affected the western workings from floor 1 down to M within the area of walls 22 to 30. The Back Vein, mostly in the Upper and Middle Quarry was either cut off or worked out. The North Vein, apart from the isolated section on G floor, was not in work at all. The main workings were in the New Vein, these being developed both east and west from various points of access on all floors from G downwards. While most of the rather narrow New Vein in the Middle and Upper Quarries had been worked out, there were still isolated parts which were available. A summary of chambers at this time reveals that there were 47 chambers in work in the New Vein compared to 3 in work and 2 nearly ready in the Old Vein - a vast change in the state of things. The main areas available for development were: i) The New Vein in the Lower Quarry on the existing floors to east and west.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 8 Coding Manual
    SECTION 8 CODING MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 8. CODING MANUAL 8.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................8-1 8.2 Mining Machines.......................................................................................................................8-1 8.3 Trade Names of Equipment.......................................................................................................8-5 8.4 All Mine Occupations .............................................................................................................8-11 All Mine Occupations - Metal/Nonmetal and Coal ................................................................8-12 (Numerical Listing) Coal and Metal/Nonmetal Occupations ................................................8-23 8.5 Degree of Injury ......................................................................................................................8-30 8.5.1 Degree 1 (Fatal)...........................................................................................................8-31 8.5.2 Degree 2 (Permanent-total or partial disability)..........................................................8-31 8.5.3 Degree 3 (Days away from work only).......................................................................8-31 8.5.4 Degree 4 (Days away from work and days of restricted activity)...............................8-32 8.5.5 Degree 5 (Days of restricted work activity only)........................................................8-32
    [Show full text]
  • The Mining Industries, 1899-1939: a Study of Output, Employment, and Productivity
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Mining Industries, 1899-1939: A Study of Output, Employment, and Productivity Volume Author/Editor: Harold Barger and Sam H. Schurr Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-042-6 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/barg44-1 Publication Date: 1944 Chapter Title: The Mechanization of the Mining Process Chapter Author: Harold Barger, Sam H. Schurr Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c6321 Chapter pages in book: (p. 117 - 145) Chapter 6 The Mechanization of the Mining Process As WITH OTHER less spectacular changes in the technique of extrac- tion, the transition from selective to nonselective methods has involved a high degree of mechanization, both in the actual op- eration of winning the ore and in its subsequent processing. Al- though it has influenced other types of mining at numerous points, nonselective exploitation is primarily a characteristic of the metal mining industries—iron ore, copper, lead and zinc, and mixed metal mining. But mechanization is by no means confined to these industries. Even where—as in coal mining—resource condi- tions have not permitted a spectacular departure from older min- ing methods, mechanization has made striking advances. In many such mines the entire process, from drilling and blasting to load- ing and hauling, has been more or less completely mechanized. Such mechanization may be said to have produced a qualitative change in mining methods. When just one or two operations are mechanized, production is speeded but the method as a whole may remain essentially unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Blasting and Reclamation Workshop
    N A T u R A L RESOURCE FUNDAMENTALS OF BLASTING AND RECLAMATION BLASTING WORKSHOP June 28, 29, and 30, 1994 DISCLAIMER This report has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Division of Geol­ ogy and Earth Resources standards and nomenclature and should not be cited. CONTENTS i PREFACE 1 Chapter 1: GLOSSARY OF TERMS 7 Chapter 2: PROPERTIES OF EXPLOSIVES 11 Chapter 3: TYPES OF EXPLOSIVES 23 Chapter 4: THEORY OF EXPLOSIVES 27 Chapter 5: UNIFORM ROCK CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 31 Chapter 6: BLASTING CALCULATIONS 35 Chapter 7: RULES OF THUMB FOR BLASTING 39 Chapter 8: DELAY SYSTEM 45 Chapter 9: INITIATION SYSTEMS 53 Chapter 10: VIBRATIONS FROM BLASTING 57 Chapter 11: BLASTING PLANS AND LOGS Appendix "A" RECLAMATION ARTICLES Preface The purpose of this manual is to provide necessary information about explosives and blasting to allow individuals with oversight responsibility for reclamation blasting to make informed decisions about, and evaluation of, blasting plans, pro­ posed techniques, and the results of reclamation blasting. It is important that the user of the manual understand that neither this manual, nor the three-day workshop during which it will be used is designed to produce blasting "experts". This manual is a guide only, no matter how intensive the instruction or complete the information contained herein. Blasting experts are not produced in three days, or even three weeks-seminars, training sessions, and "how-to-do-it" books and pamphlets, including those of the author of this manual, not withstand­ ing. CAVEAT The information contained herein is based upon the best available information, field tests, and the experience of any number of highly trained and qualified spe­ cialists in the use of explosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the 1986 Metal and Nonmetal Mining Workforce
    I ! BUREAU OF MINES INFORMATION CIRCULAR/1988 Characterization of the 1986 Metal and Nonmetal Mining Workforce I I By Shail J. Butani and Ann M. Bartholomew UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Information Circular 9193 Characterization of the 1986 Metal and Nonmetal Mining Workforce By Shail J. Butani and Ann M. Bartholomew UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Donald Paul Hodel, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES T S Ary, Director Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Butani, Shail J. Characterization of the 1986 metal and nonmetal mining workforce. ilnformation cIrcular; 9193) Bibliogr;;ph,,: p. 7 Supt. of Docs. no.: I 28.27:9193 1. Miners-United States. L Bartholomew, Ann M. II. Titlt;;. Ill. Series: Information circular (Unitt;;d States. Bureau of Mines) ; 9193. TN23.U43 622 s 331.7'622'0973 88-600141 HD8039.M6l U44 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract .......... ... ..... ......... ....... ... ....... ... .... ........ 1 Summary of major findings ................................. 5 Introduction ..................................................... .) Application of data for injury analyses .................. '7 Acknowledgments .............................................. 2 Recommendations for future work ........................ 7 Survey methodology ........................................... 2 References ........................................................ 7 Population .................................................... 2 Appendix A.-Metal and nonmetal mi::ling industry Sample ........................................................
    [Show full text]