DOCSLIB.ORG

Jimmy Carter and US Foreign Policy Towards Iran, 1977-1981

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jimmy Carter and US Foreign Policy Towards Iran, 1977-1981 _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses The collapsing pillar: Jimmy Carter and US foreign policy towards Iran, 1977-1981. Rees, Samuel Huw How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Rees, Samuel Huw (2013) The collapsing pillar: Jimmy Carter and US foreign policy towards Iran, 1977-1981.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa43014 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ The Collapsing Pillar Jimmy Carter and US foreign policy towards Iran, 1977-1981 Samuel Huw Rees Submitted to Swansea University in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Swansea University 2013 ProQuest Number: 10821404 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10821404 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 SUMMARY (ABSTRACT) The continuing diplomatic impasse between the United States and Iran dates back to the turbulent events of the late 1970s. Blame for the ‘loss’ of Iran, which had been one of the ‘twin pillars’ of US strategy in the Persian Gulf, has inevitably fallen on the White House incumbent at the time, President Jimmy Carter. This thesis offers a reassessment of Carter’s decision making and his responses to the fall of the Shah, the Islamic Revolution and the US embassy hostage taking. It demonstrates that the breakdown of US-Iranian relations was not simply a one-president phenomenon and, more significantly, Carter’s handling of Iran was not as dire as it is often portrayed. The research is based on a thorough examination of the available archive material, including newly released documents, as well as recent interviews with the major protagonists. When Carter took office in 1977 he inherited a badly creaking Iranian pillar that was soon to collapse altogether. The flawed policies of his predecessors placed strict limitations on his administration and unwittingly created a ticking time bomb in the form of the Shah. Despite these restrictions, Carter battled to reconcile the strategic necessities of Cold War containment with his moral principles in areas such as human rights and arms sales. In an administration seemingly dominated by the disagreements amongst his top two advisors, Carter remained the key decision maker at all times. He recognised the practical limits of American power and assumed sensible positions in response to an ever changing and uncontrollable crisis. Aside from its contemporary significance, Iran is therefore critical to Carter’s disputed legacy and how he rates as a foreign policy president. DECLARATIONS AND STATEMENTS DECLARATION: This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed (candidate) < Date 13 STATEMENT I: This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signer (candidate) Date STATEMENT 2: I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed (candidate) Date CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS p. ii INTRODUCTION p. 1 LITERATURE REVIEW: Portrayals of Carter’s Foreign Policy p. 8 1. The Historical Roots of American Involvement in Iran p. 17 2. The Cold War and American Support for the Shah p. 46 3. Carter’s Iranian Inheritance p. 74 4. Strategic Realities versus Moral Values: p. 100 Arms Sales and Human Rights 5. Limited Intelligence: p. 134 The Onset of the Iranian Revolution 6. Reacting to Iran: US responses 1978 p. 166 7. Reacting to Iran: US responses 1979 p. 192 8. The Decision to Admit the Shah into the United States p. 217 9. Held Hostage by Khomeini: p. 248 Launching Operation Eagle Claw CONCLUSION p. 295 BIBLIOGRAPHY p. 304 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost from an academic standpoint I am deeply indebted to my supervisor, Professor Jon Roper, who has been with me every step of the way since October 2006 when I started as a part-time student. Jon has been a great source of encouragement and wisdom throughout, often going above and beyond the call of duty, particularly when I moved away from the area and again following his recent retirement. He always challenged me to improve every facet of my work and there is no doubt that without such a knowledgeable and dedicated influence I would not have completed the final thesis to the standard I have. Thanks a lot Jon, hopefully I repaid the favour somewhat by successfully teaching your eldest daughter Caitlin! I would also like to thank Dave Bewley-Taylor, for taking over as lead supervisor in the final months and for guiding me through the submission process, and all those in what was the Department of American Studies at Swansea. There are many people in the research and academic community that have aided me over the last six years or more. I would like to offer heartfelt thanks to those who willingly agreed to be interviewed or offer their thoughts to the project; principally Bill Daugherty, Phil Wise, and Henry Precht. The staff at the Jimmy Carter Presidential Library in Atlanta, Georgia were extremely helpful during the three weeks I spent there in March and April 2008, none more so than archivist Albert Nason. Thanks also to the kind people at Armstrong Atlantic State University in Savannah and Mercer University in Macon who hosted me as a guest lecturer during my stint in Georgia. I also have to thank my employers over the last six years - Bridgend County Borough Council; Gorseinon College (latterly Gower College Swansea); and South Downs College. All have been supportive in their different ways and have given me time off to take up various opportunities or to attend conferences. Finally, and most importantly, I would like to thank all my family, friends, teammates and colleagues who have supported me throughout what for them must have seemed like a torturously long time. Two people in particular who have been ever-present sufferers and supporters; my mother Peta and my wife Jane. Mum has been there during some of the toughest times, encouraging me to keep going and offering her assistance whenever I have needed it. Jane has been forced to live and breathe the project first hand for six years, showing great patience when books and papers have been spread far and wide. Working full-time and completing the thesis in my ‘spare time’ as we have changed jobs, moved houses, got married, and welcomed our son loan Gareth into the world, has not been easy and we have had to forgo a lot of things in order for me to complete it. My family and friends have been my rock and needless to say that I owe you all a great deal of thanks; I could not have achieved what I have done without you. SHR, February 2013. ii Dedicated to the memory of my father Professor Gareth Rees (1951-2008) He inspired me to undertake my own research, then encouraged and guided me for the first two years until he passed away in2008 after a long struggle against cancer. His strength and belief in my ability has driven me on towards the finishing line and enabled me to negotiate the many difficult times during the last few years. INTRODUCTION The roots of the fragile US-Iranian relationship can be found in the seminal events of the late 1970s, events that continue to echo in their historical importance today. For many commentators, contemporary US foreign policy towards Iran and Iran’s position in the international community is still defined by what happened over thirty years ago. Understanding the relationship between the US and Iran today is simply not possible without consideration of their past interactions and encounters, particularly those that occurred during the one-term presidency of Jimmy Carter from 1977-81. On 7 April 1980, five months after the US embassy in Tehran was overrun by Iranian militants and American diplomats were taken hostage, the US government formally broke off diplomatic relations with Iran. For over thirty years the state of play has remained unchanged and currently shows little prospect of improvement in the near future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANNUAL REPORT 1998-1999 JUSTIN GUARIGLIA Children Along the Streets of Jakarta, Indonesia, Welcome President and Mrs
    M E S S A G E F R O M J I M M Y C A R T E R ANNUAL REPORT 1998-1999 JUSTIN GUARIGLIA Children along the streets of Jakarta, Indonesia, welcome President and Mrs. Carter. WAGING PEACE ★ FIGHTING DISEASE ★ BUILDING HOPE The Carter Center One Copenhill Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5100 Fax (404) 420-5145 www.cartercenter.org THE CARTER CENTER A B O U T T H E C A R T E R C E N T E R C A R T E R C E N T E R B O A R D O F T R U S T E E S T H E C A R T E R C E N T E R M I S S I O N S T A T E M E N T Located in Atlanta, The Carter Center is governed by its board of trustees. Chaired by President Carter, with Mrs. Carter as vice chair, the board The Carter Center oversees the Center’s assets and property, and promotes its objectives and goals. Members include: The Carter Center, in partnership with Emory University, is guided by a fundamental houses offices for Jimmy and Rosalynn commitment to human rights and the alleviation of human suffering; it seeks to prevent and Jimmy Carter Robert G. Edge Kent C. “Oz” Nelson Carter and most of Chair Partner Retired Chair and CEO resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and improve health. the Center’s program Alston & Bird United Parcel Service of America staff, who promote Rosalynn Carter peace and advance Vice Chair Jane Fonda Charles B.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Hostage Crisis National Security Council, 1979 !
    CRISIS COMMITTEES | 2014e IRAN HOSTAGE CRISIS NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, 1979 ! Dear Delegates, We are in the midst of the Iran Hostage Crisis, and there is no time to spare. Our situation is grave and desperate, and together we will find a solution into dealing with the recent events regarding the kidnapping of 52 Americans from the United States embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979. Indeed there are many sides to this issue, and debates will be tense. The dichotomy between the many people being represented in this committee will surely lead to many disputes and tough agreements. Can the situation remain diplomatic? Or will it lead to something else? It shall remain up to you. It is with great pleasure, as director of this committee, to welcome you to our 2014 UTMUN conference. My name is Stanley Treivus, and alongside our Crisis manager Meerah Haq, we look forward to this thrilling weekend of debate that awaits us. We are both first year students studying Political Science and International relations and this will be our first time being involved in UTMUN. This conference will appeal to all delegates, experienced or novice. And our hope is that you will leave this committee with not only profound knowledge on the subject, but with a better sense of communication and improved debating skills than you had before. The issues we will be discussing will surround the many topics that relate directly to the Iran Hostage Crisis. We will look at foreign relations between the United States and Iran shortly before and during the crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today
    Volume: 8 Issue: 2 Year: 2011 A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today Ercan Karakoç Abstract After initiation of the glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring) policies in the USSR by Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet Union started to crumble, and old, forgotten, suppressed problems especially regarding territorial claims between Azerbaijanis and Armenians reemerged. Although Mountainous (Nagorno) Karabakh is officially part of Azerbaijan Republic, after fierce and bloody clashes between Armenians and Azerbaijanis, the entire Nagorno Karabakh region and seven additional surrounding districts of Lachin, Kelbajar, Agdam, Jabrail, Fizuli, Khubadly and Zengilan, it means over 20 per cent of Azerbaijan, were occupied by Armenians, and because of serious war situations, many Azerbaijanis living in these areas had to migrate from their homeland to Azerbaijan and they have been living under miserable conditions since the early 1990s. Keywords: Karabakh, Caucasia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Ottoman Empire, Safavid Empire, Russia and Soviet Union Assistant Professor of Modern Turkish History, Yıldız Technical University, [email protected] 1003 Karakoç, E. (2011). A Brief Overview on Karabakh History from Past to Today. International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 8:2. Available: http://www.insanbilimleri.com/en Geçmişten günümüze Karabağ tarihi üzerine bir değerlendirme Ercan Karakoç Özet Mihail Gorbaçov tarafından başlatılan glasnost (açıklık) ve perestroyka (yeniden inşa) politikalarından sonra Sovyetler Birliği parçalanma sürecine girdi ve birlik coğrafyasındaki unutulmuş ve bastırılmış olan eski problemler, özellikle Azerbaycan Türkleri ve Ermeniler arasındaki sınır sorunları yeniden gün yüzüne çıktı. Bu bağlamda, hukuken Azerbaycan devletinin bir parçası olan Dağlık Karabağ bölgesi ve çevresindeki Laçin, Kelbecer, Cebrail, Agdam, Fizuli, Zengilan ve Kubatlı gibi yedi semt, yani yaklaşık olarak Azerbaycan‟ın yüzde yirmiye yakın toprağı, her iki toplum arasındaki şiddetli ve kanlı çarpışmalardan sonra Ermeniler tarafından işgal edildi.
    [Show full text]
  • History Brief: Timeline of US-Iran Relations Until the Obama
    MIT International Review | web.mit.edu/mitir 1 of 5 HISTORY BRIEF: TIMELINE OF US‐IRAN RELATIONS UNTIL THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION Key Facts & Catalysts By Sam Sasan Shoamanesh Looking back at key events in this US‐Iran chronicle is helpful in understanding some of the traditional causes of friction and mistrust between Tehran and Washington. A reference to the annals of US‐Iran relations will also be valuable in appreciating that the policies of the past sixty years have not been advantageous to US interests and on the contrary, have resulted in blowbacks, which still vex the relations to this day. 1856: Genesis of Formal Relations | Diplomatic relations between Iran and the United States began in 1856. 1909: American Lafayette in Iran | In 1909, Howard Baskerville, an American teacher and Princeton graduate on a Presbyterian mission in Tabriz, Iran, instantly becomes an Iranian national hero where after joining the Constitutionalists during the Constitutional Revolution of 1905‐1911, loses his young life while fighting the Royalists and the forces of the Qajar king, Mohmmad Ali Shah’s elite Cossack brigade. He is remembered as saying: ʺ[t]he only difference between me and these people is my place of birth, and this is not a big difference.ʺ To this day he is revered by Iranians. Second World War | Until the second World War, the US had no interest or an active policy vis‐à‐vis Iran and relations remained cordial. 1953 C.I.A. Coup | In 1951, Prime Minister Mossadegh and his National Front party (“Jebhe Melli”), a socio‐democratic, liberal‐secular nationalist party in Iran, nationalize the country’s oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979
    Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter now, including display on the World Wide Web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis. Jay Schaefer April 10, 2018 Push and Pull: Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979 by Jay Schaefer Kenneth W. Stein Adviser History Kenneth W. Stein Adviser Joseph P. Crespino Committee Member Dan Reiter Committee Member 2018 Push and Pull: Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979 By Jay Schaefer Kenneth W. Stein Adviser An abstract of a thesis submitted to the Faculty of Emory College of Arts and Sciences of Emory University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors History 2018 Abstract Push and Pull: Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979 By Jay Schaefer This thesis is a critical examination of President Jimmy Carter’s Middle East negotiating strategy between the signing of the Camp David Accords and the signing of the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Modern Politicization of the Persian Poet Nezami Ganjavi
    Official Digitized Version by Victoria Arakelova; with errata fixed from the print edition ON THE MODERN POLITICIZATION OF THE PERSIAN POET NEZAMI GANJAVI YEREVAN SERIES FOR ORIENTAL STUDIES Edited by Garnik S. Asatrian Vol.1 SIAVASH LORNEJAD ALI DOOSTZADEH ON THE MODERN POLITICIZATION OF THE PERSIAN POET NEZAMI GANJAVI Caucasian Centre for Iranian Studies Yerevan 2012 Siavash Lornejad, Ali Doostzadeh On the Modern Politicization of the Persian Poet Nezami Ganjavi Guest Editor of the Volume Victoria Arakelova The monograph examines several anachronisms, misinterpretations and outright distortions related to the great Persian poet Nezami Ganjavi, that have been introduced since the USSR campaign for Nezami‖s 800th anniversary in the 1930s and 1940s. The authors of the monograph provide a critical analysis of both the arguments and terms put forward primarily by Soviet Oriental school, and those introduced in modern nationalistic writings, which misrepresent the background and cultural heritage of Nezami. Outright forgeries, including those about an alleged Turkish Divan by Nezami Ganjavi and falsified verses first published in Azerbaijan SSR, which have found their way into Persian publications, are also in the focus of the authors‖ attention. An important contribution of the book is that it highlights three rare and previously neglected historical sources with regards to the population of Arran and Azerbaijan, which provide information on the social conditions and ethnography of the urban Iranian Muslim population of the area and are indispensable for serious study of the Persian literature and Iranian culture of the period. ISBN 978-99930-69-74-4 The first print of the book was published by the Caucasian Centre for Iranian Studies in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Historical Society the CENTER for VIRGINIA HISTORY
    Virginia Historical Society THE CENTER FOR VIRGINIA HISTORY ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2004 ANNUAL MEETING, 23 APRIL 2005 Annual Report for 2004 Introduction Charles F. Bryan, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer he most notable public event of 2004 for the Virginia Historical Society was undoubtedly the groundbreaking ceremony on the first of TJuly for our building expansion. On that festive afternoon, we ushered in the latest chapter of growth and development for the VHS. By turning over a few shovelsful of earth, we began a construction project that will add much-needed programming, exhibition, and storage space to our Richmond headquarters. It was a grand occasion and a delight to see such a large crowd of friends and members come out to participate. The representative individuals who donned hard hats and wielded silver shovels for the formal ritual of begin- ning construction stood in for so many others who made the event possible. Indeed, if the groundbreaking was the most important public event of the year, it represented the culmination of a vast investment behind the scenes in forward thinking, planning, and financial commitment by members, staff, trustees, and friends. That effort will bear fruit in 2006 in a magnifi- cent new facility. To make it all happen, we directed much of our energy in 2004 to the 175th Anniversary Campaign–Home for History in order to reach the ambitious goal of $55 million. That effort is on track—and for that we can be grateful—but much work remains to be done. Moreover, we also need to continue to devote resources and talent to sustain the ongoing programs and activities of the VHS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of Afghanistan: a Historical Sketch George Passman Tate
    University of Nebraska Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Books in English Digitized Books 1-1-1911 The kingdom of Afghanistan: a historical sketch George Passman Tate Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/afghanuno Part of the History Commons, and the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Tate, George Passman The kingdom of Afghanistan: a historical sketch, with an introductory note by Sir Henry Mortimer Durand. Bombay: "Times of India" Offices, 1911. 224 p., maps This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Books at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books in English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tate, G,P. The kfn&ean sf Af&mistan, DATE DUE I Mil 7 (7'8 DEDICATED, BY PERMISSION, HIS EXCELLENCY BARON HARDINGE OF PENSHURST. VICEROY AND GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF INDIA, .a- . (/. BY m HIS OBEDIENT, SERVANT THE AUTHOR. il.IEmtev 01 the Asiniic Society, Be?zg-nl, S?~rueyof I~din. dafhor of 'I Seisinqz : A Menzoir on the FJisio~y,Topo~rcrphj~, A7zliquiiies, (112d Peo$Ie of the Cozi?zt~y''; The F/.o?zlic7,.~ of Baluchisia'nn : Travels on ihe Border.? of Pe~szk n?zd Akhnnistnn " ; " ICalnf : A lMe??zoir on t7ze Cozl7~try and Fnrrzily of the Ahntadsai Khn7zs of Iinlnt" ; 4 ec. \ViTkI AN INrPR<dl>kJCTOl2Y NO'FE PRINTED BY BENNETT COLEMAN & Co., Xc. PUBLISHED AT THE " TIMES OF INDIA" OFFTCES, BOMBAY & C.1LCUTT-4, LONDON AGENCY : gg, SI-IOE LANE, E.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Military Assistance to Saudi Arabia, 1942-1964
    DANCE OF SWORDS: U.S. MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO SAUDI ARABIA, 1942-1964 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bruce R. Nardulli, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2002 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Adviser Professor Peter L. Hahn _______________________ Adviser Professor David Stebenne History Graduate Program UMI Number: 3081949 ________________________________________________________ UMI Microform 3081949 Copyright 2003 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ____________________________________________________________ ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ABSTRACT The United States and Saudi Arabia have a long and complex history of security relations. These relations evolved under conditions in which both countries understood and valued the need for cooperation, but also were aware of its limits and the dangers of too close a partnership. U.S. security dealings with Saudi Arabia are an extreme, perhaps unique, case of how security ties unfolded under conditions in which sensitivities to those ties were always a central —oftentimes dominating—consideration. This was especially true in the most delicate area of military assistance. Distinct patterns of behavior by the two countries emerged as a result, patterns that continue to this day. This dissertation examines the first twenty years of the U.S.-Saudi military assistance relationship. It seeks to identify the principal factors responsible for how and why the military assistance process evolved as it did, focusing on the objectives and constraints of both U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 9, 1977 TIME DAY 6:58 A.M
    HE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER _OCATION DATE (MO., Day. Yr., CALHOUN, GEORGIA APRIL 9, 1977 TIME DAY 6:58 a.m. SATURDAY TIME ACTIVITY From To 6:58 The President and Jack Carter went to their motorcade. 6:58 7:09 The President and Jack Carter motored from Jack Carter's residence to a construction site West of Calhoun, Georgia whereJack Carter was building a soybean elevator and warehouse. 7:09 7:33 The President and Jack Carter toured the construction site. The President greeted the crowd gathered for his visit. 7:33 The President and Jack Carter returned to their motorcade. 7:33 7:45 The President and Jack Carter motored from the construction site to "Lancelot,"a farm owned by Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Thomas B. "Bert" Lance. 7:49 The President and Jack Carter went to the tennis courts. The President and Jack Carter played tennis. 9:25 / The President and Jack Carter returned to their motorcade. 9:25 9:36 The President and Jack Carter motored from Lancelot to Jack Carter's residence. 10:16 R The President was telephoned by Rev. William F. "Billy" Graham, President of the Billy Graham Evangelist Association. Deputy Special Assistant for Appointments, Timothy G. Smith took the call. 10:27 The President returned to his motorcade. He wasaccompanied . by . The First Lady Amy Carter 10:27 10:45 The Presidential party motored from Jack Carter's residence to the residence of Judy Carter's parents, Mr. and Mrs. J. Beverly Langford.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiraz Dissertation Full 8.2.20. Final Format
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO The Shiraz Arts Festival: Cultural Democracy, National Identity, and Revolution in Iranian Performance, 1967-1977 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy In Music By Joshua Jamsheed Charney Committee in charge: Professor Anthony Davis, Co-Chair Professor Jann Pasler, Co-Chair Professor Aleck Karis Professor Babak Rahimi Professor Shahrokh Yadegari 2020 © Joshua Jamsheed Charney, 2020 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Joshua Jamsheed Charney is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Co-chair _____________________________________________________________ Co-Chair University of California San Diego 2020 iii EPIGRAPH Oh my Shiraz, the nonpareil of towns – The lord look after it, and keep it from decay! Hafez iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page…………………………………………………………………… iii Epigraph…………………………………………………………………………. iv Table of Contents………………………………………………………………… v Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………… vii Vita………………………………………………………………………………. viii Abstract of the Dissertation……………………………………………………… ix Introduction……………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter 1: Festival Overview …………………………………………………… 17 Chapter 2: Cultural Democracy………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 04-5928 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JOSÉ ERNESTO MEDELLÍN, Petitioner, v. DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF AMBASSADOR L. BRUCE LAINGEN AND LIEUTENANT COLONEL JOHN J. SWIFT, ET AL., IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER JOSEPH MARGULIES MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL TH 1111 EAST 60 STREET CHICAGO, IL 60637 Telephone: (773) 702-9560 Counsel for Amici i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities…………………………………….. ii Interest of Amici Curiae………………………………… 1 Summary of Argument…………………………………. 5 Argument……………………………………………….. 6 I. The United States Played A Leading Role In Developing The International Protections Provided By Both The Vienna Convention And The Optional Protocol………………….. 6 II. Failure To Provide Vigorous And Robust Enforcement Of The Vienna Convention Could Have Grave Consequences For U.S. Citizens Abroad………………………............ 16 Conclusion……………………………………………….. 27 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES: Breard v. Pruett, 134 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1998).......................................22 Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, (U.S.A. v. Iran), 1980 I.C.J. 3 (Judgment of May 24).................................................14 Flores v. State, 994 P.2d 782 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999)......................23 Standt v. City of New York, 153 F. Supp. 2d 417 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)................... 21-22 U.S. v. Carillo 70 F. Supp. 2d 854 (N.D. Ill. 1999) ............................22 TREATIES: Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, April 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596 UNTS 261...............................passim Optional Protocol Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes, April 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T.
    [Show full text]