The English Dominican Province : (1221-1921)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The English Dominican Province : (1221-1921) *\i - HE ENGLISH OMINICAN PROVINCE (1221-1921) Library)LIBRARY^ </> (library] CO THE ENGLISH DOMINICAN PROVINCE / The English Dominican Province (1221-1921) (/>! (library LONDON CATHOLIC TRUTH SO 69 SOUTHWARK BRIDGE RO 1921 FOREWORD EVERY age has its own special need and call. For seven hundred years the children of St. Dominic, at their Father's command and helped by his prayers, have sought to meet the needs and answer the call of each succeeding age. The present book seeks to show how they tried in the past to do their duty. Seven hundred years have passed since the first English Dominicans came to their native land to plant the Dominican tree. With many great successes and many great failures, with many great joys yet many deep and terrible trials and sorrows, their work through the centuries has gone on, and it is a great subject of rejoicing to see them to-day still at work in the land that gave them birth. To pursue the simile of the tree (for the tree that St. Dominic planted is still growing in Rome in the garden of St. Sabina) we can always expect and indeed look for many branches to wither and to die. Each year the tree puts off its leaves and each year fresh ones come up. Though the new leaves know little of the ones that went before, save to see them lying dead at the foot of the tree, it is the hidden sap unseen by both that gives life to each and clothes them all with glory year by year—how foolish if the leaves were to boast and to take the glory to themselves ! So when read- ing these pages, if the children of St. Dominic take the glory of the tree's appearance unto themselves and boast, they will do a very foolish thing. The present book is not brought before the public eye in a boasting spirit, but in order that those who read may praise the Providence of God, who through His weak and sinful creatures has, by His life-giving grace, done such great things. St. Dominic, so deeply misunderstood in every age by those who judge superficially, is specially loved by those who know him because to a saint's love and trust of God he added an almost limitless trust and reverence for the good sense and freedom of men. He so loved his children that he gave them in his fatherly love an abiding trust of ; vi Foreword perfect liberty, such as no other saint ever dared to give his children. He wrote no rule, but bade them love God, and, with his love burning in their hearts, govern themselves according to the needs of each time and place. When reading the following pages we cannot help being astonished at the wonderful trusting way of the Saint, and praising him for this wonderful trust of God and men that seven centuries still see at work in our midst. How these poor Dominican friars and nuns lived in the days of their foundation and in the days of Faith we can perhaps readily understand ; but when the dark clouds of religious unbelief came and the dread hand of persecution fell on them and with a far reaching sweep scattered them abroad, we read with astonishment of their survival. At every page we expect to read that the last of them has ex- pired, yet we still find one, two, or three keeping the torch alight. Sometimes the fire is very low—indeed it is only by crouching into the most protected corner that the holder of the torch keeps it from instant extinction. We watch them as we would watch a man walk down a draughty corridor with a naked candle in his hand ; it seems as though they were trying to do an impossibility : yet one after another they do it, and each finds a successor to whom he can hand down the torch. Thus for many weary years of patient striv- ing, from hand to hand the torch of Dominic comes down to us, and we see it with a bright light, burning in our midst. What the future has in store for us, God alone knows, but we do know that as the torch was handed to us we have to hand it down to others. The burning torch of praying, learning, teaching, is the thing that matters ; the bearers only interest us as far as they carry the torch and no further. Whence they came does not interest us much ; and we know that at the end they go to God. May these pages kindle in the heart of those who read them a greater love for God and for the salvation of souls and a deeper trust in that Almighty Providence, who, in spite of the passions and ambitions of men, works out the sanctiflcation and salvation of those who love Him. J* Felix Couturier, O.P. Bishop of Myriophytos. London : Feast of the Commemoration of St. Paul, 1Q21. CONTENTS PAGE Foreword .... V By Bishop Felix Couturier, O.P. I. The Foundation I By F. Bede Jarrett, O.P. II. In Public Life 2 • 5 By F. Walter Gumbley, O.P. III. In Theology .... • 53 By F. Walter Gumbley, O.P. IV. The Bible .... • 77 By F. Hugh Pope, O.P. V. Their Ascetical Teaching • "3 By F. Bede Jarrett, O.P. VI. As Preachers . 141 By F. Walter Gumbley, O.P. VII. In Literature . 165 By F. Edwin Essex, O.P. VIII. At the Reformation • '93 By F. Bede Jarrett, O.P. IX. The Period of Eclipse 221 By F. Robert Bracey, O.P. X. Their Second Spring . 249 By F. Raymund Devas, O.P. XI. The Nuns .... • 273 By Sister Mary Benvenuta, O.P. XII. The Third Order . • 303 By F. Fabian Dix, O.P. THE ENGLISH DOMINICANS I. THE FOUNDATION By BEDE JARRETT, O.P. IT was the white shores of Kent that first in England beheld the whiter wool of St. Dominic. On a summer's day in early August, 122 1, following in the train of Bishop Peter des Roches, who was afterwards to become greatly unpopular as the foreign favourite of Henry III when he came of age, were a band of thirteen friars, headed by Gilbert de Fraxineto, sent by St. Dominic after the second Chapter General of the Order held two months before, in Bologna. Tradi- tion has settled somehow that Gilbert was an English- man, which would mean that he should more properly be called Gilbert Ash. He came, then, with his group, under the patronage of Bishop Peter of Winchester, and straightway after his arrival was introduced to the Primate, Cardinal Stephen Langton, at Canterbury. But it is simpler and better to tell the story of the coming of the friars in the words of an English Domini- can born within a generation from the date of their arrival : "At the second General Chapter of the Order of Friar Preachers which was held at Bologna under the blessed Dominic, there were sent into Eng- land, Friar Preachers to the number of thirteen, having as their Prior, Friar Gilbert Ash. In the company of the venerable Father, Lord Peter des Roches, Bishop of Winchester, they reached Canterbury. After they 2 The English Dominicans had presented themselves to Lord Stephen, the Archbishop, and after he had understood that they were preachers, he straightway ordered Gilbert to preach before him in a certain church where he was himself that day to have preached. The prelate was so edified by the friar's sermon that henceforth during his episcopate he favoured and promoted the Order and its work. Leaving Canterbury, the friars came to London on the Feast of St. Lawrence, and finally reached Oxford on the Feast of the Assumption of the Glorious Virgin, to whose honour they built their Oratory. They held the schools that are now called St. Edward's, and settled in that parish for some time, but finding that they had no room for expand- ing, they removed to another site given them by the King, where, outside the city walls, they now dwell." From this brief account of Nicholas Trivet, 1 we can suppose that the friars arrived at Canterbury on August 6th, the feast of the Transfiguration of our Lord, for it was only on the days of greater feasts that Bishops were accustomed to preach and to assist pontifically at the Mass. This date is further confirmed by the rate of the progress of the friars, who took five days in getting from London to Oxford, a distance of about fifty miles, and who, probably, therefore, would have taken four days to cover the ground between Canterbury and London. If this date of August 6th can be accepted as the day of their arrival, it is interesting to note it as also the day of St. Dominic's death : he died on the Feast of the Transfiguration, 1221. But altogether apart from this question of dates, the main point to be noted in the above quotation, 1 The son of a Justice-in-Eyre of Henry III, he lived from 1258 to 1328 chiefly in London, Oxford, and Paris. He became a Dominican early in life and was familiar with the court and person of Edward II. His most famous book is the Annals of England 1 1 36-1 307. The Foundation 3 is that the true objective of the friars on their arrival was Oxford. They halted at Canterbury and London, but it is clear that they as yet made no foundation in either of these places.
Recommended publications
  • Central Province
    CENTRAL PROVINCE INITIATE FORMATION 4. STUDY “WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE EVEN ZEAL IS NOT GOOD.” (Proverbs 19: 2) STUDY is the next pillar of the Dominican Order. It is fitting that it should follow Prayer because Dominicans see both as flowing one into the other. To a Dominican Study is the contemplation of ‘Veritas’ (Truth) and God is Truth. So our Study is another form of Prayer which is why the Dominican takes Study so seriously. THE CHURCH Of course Study is not simply the province of the Dominican but is necessary for all Christians, ordained, consecrated and lay. The Church assures us of this: “Since they are called by baptism to lead a life in keeping with the teaching of the gospel, the Christian faithful have the right to a Christian education by which they are to be instructed properly to strive for the maturity of the human person and at the same time to know and live the mystery of salvation”. (Canon 217) The Church encourages all to seek out and pursue this knowledge: “Lay people who are capable and trained may also collaborate in catechetical formation, in teaching the sacred sciences, and in use of the communications media.” (Catechism 906) This knowledge should be shared with others: “In accord with the knowledge, competence, and preeminence which they possess, [lay people] have the right and even at times a duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church, and they have a right to make their opinion known to the other Christian faithful with due regard to the integrity of faith and morals…( Canon 212) 1 The Church was founded to spread the kingdom of Christ throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul's Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640
    Paul’s Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640 Studies in the History of Christian Traditions General Editor Robert J. Bast Knoxville, Tennessee In cooperation with Paul C.H. Lim, Nashville, Tennessee Eric Saak, Liverpool Christine Shepardson, Knoxville, Tennessee Brian Tierney, Ithaca, New York Arjo Vanderjagt, Groningen John Van Engen, Notre Dame, Indiana Founding Editor Heiko A. Oberman† VOLUME 171 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/shct Paul’s Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640 Edited by Torrance Kirby P.G. Stanwood LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 Cover illustration and Frontispiece: ‘A sermon preached in the presence of King James I at Paul’s Cross’. The Society of Antiquaries’ diptych commissioned by Henry Farley in 1616 and painted by John Gipkyn. Scharf XLIII, Way/Museum No. 304, Burlington House, London. By kind permission of the Society of Antiquaries, London. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Paul’s Cross and the culture of persuasion in England, 1520-1640 / edited by Torrance Kirby, P.G. Stanwood. pages cm. -- (Studies in the history of Christian traditions, ISSN 1573-5664 ; VOLUME 171) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-24227-2 (hardback : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-90-04-26281-2 (e-book) 1. Preaching-- England--London--History--16th century. 2. Preaching--England--London--History--17th century. 3. Sermons, English--16th century. 4. Sermons, English--17th century. 5. St. Paul’s Cathedral (London, England) 6. London (England)--Church history--16th century. 7. London (England)--Church history-- 17th century. I. Kirby, W. J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Author(S): Nicholas Overgaard Source: Prandium - the Journal of Historical Studies, Vol
    Early Modern Catholic Defense of Copernicanism: The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Author(s): Nicholas Overgaard Source: Prandium - The Journal of Historical Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Spring, 2013), pp. 29-36 Published by: The Department of Historical Studies, University of Toronto Mississauga Stable URL: http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/prandium/article/view/19654 Prandium: The Journal of Historical Studies Vol. 2, No. 1, (2013) Early Modern Catholic Defense of Copernicanism: The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Nicholas Overgaard “Obedience should be blind and prompt,” Ignatius of Loyola reminded his Jesuit brothers a decade after their founding in 1540.1 By the turn of the seventeenth century, the incumbent Superior General Claudio Aquaviva had reiterated Loyola’s expectation of “blind obedience,” with specific regard to Jesuit support for the Catholic Church during the Galileo Affair.2 Interpreting the relationship between the Jesuits and Copernicans like Galileo Galilei through the frame of “blind obedience” reaffirms the conservative image of the Catholic Church – to which the Jesuits owed such obedience – as committed to its medieval traditions. In opposition to this perspective, I will argue that the Jesuits involved in the Galileo Affair3 represent the progressive ideas of the Church in the early seventeenth century. To prove this, I will argue that although the Jesuits rejected the epistemological claims of Copernicanism, they found it beneficial in its practical applications. The desire to solidify their status as the intellectual elites of the Church caused the Jesuits to reject Copernicanism in public. However, they promoted an intellectual environment in which Copernican studies – particularly those of Galileo – could develop with minimal opposition, theological or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominican Spirituality
    OurLadyoftheHolyRosaryProvince,OP DOMINICAN SPIRITUALITY Principles and Practice By WILLIAM A. HINNEBUSCH, O.P. Illustrations by SISTER MARY OF THE COMPASSION, O.P. http://www.domcentral.org/trad/domspirit/default.htm DOMINICANSPIRITUALITY 1 OurLadyoftheHolyRosaryProvince,OP FOREWORD Most of this book originated in a series of conferences to the Dominican Sisters of the Congregation of the Most Holy Cross, Amityville, New York, at Dominican Commercial High School, Jamaica, L. I., during the Lent of 1962. All the conferences have been rewritten with some minor deletions and the addition of considerable new material. The first chapter is added as a general introduction to Dominican life to serve as a unifying principle for the rest of the book. I have also adapted the material to the needs of a wider reading audience. No longer do I address the sister but the Dominican. While some matter applies specifically to nuns or sisters, the use of masculine nouns and pronouns elsewhere by no means indicates that I am addressing only the members of the First Order. Though the forms and methods of their spiritual life vary to some degree ( especially that of the secular tertiary), all Dominicans share the same basic vocation and follow the same spiritual path. I must thank the sisters of the Amityville community for their interest in the conferences, the sisters of Dominican Commercial High School for taping and mimeographing them, the fathers and the sisters of other Congregations who suggested that a larger audience might welcome them. I am grateful to the fathers especially of the Dominican House of Studies, Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pillars of Dominican Life
    Section: Two: Formation Programmes Australian Province (www.op.org.au/laity/manual/two.pdf) THE PILLARS OF DOMINICAN LIFE DOMINICAN SPIRITUALITY FOR THE LAITY PREFACE The following chapters are adaptations of conferences I gave to the members four San Francisco Chapter of Lay Dominicans. They were further adapted to serve as our formation programs for those who have asked to be received into the Order. They are a distillation of reflections, study and conclusions I have drawn over my fifty-four years as a Dominican. As Master of Students for the formation of our young Dominicans to the priesthood I had to reflect on these concepts more intensely than I would have ordinarily. They have been further modified for a wider audience with the hope that it will find them helpful in clarifying what it means to be a Dominican. It is a glorious vocation, a rich blessing and grace from God. Let us be grateful to him for it. Gregory Anderson, O.P. Chaplain to the San Francisco Chapter of Lay Dominicans 1 THE PILLARS OF DOMINICAN LIFE DOMINICAN SPIRITUALITY FOR THE LAITY INTRODUCTION Anyone who is at all familiar with spiritual literature knows that there are various schools of spirituality. We speak freely and easily of Benedictine Spirituality, Franciscan Spirituality, Carmelite Spirituality, and Ignatian Spirituality. We know also there a number of other subdivisions, such as Rhenish, French and so forth. We Dominicans may feel somewhat chagrined that Dominican Spirituality is not mentioned in the same context. We may wonder if there is such a thing as a peculiarly Dominican Spirituality, and if there is, why does it not get more publicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Henri Dominiqie Lacordaire
    HENRI D OMINIQUE LACORDAIRE A V Z AZAZ SAME A UTHOR. Madame L ouise de France, Daughter of Louis XV., known also as the Mother TÉRESE DE S. AUGUSTIN. A D ominican Artist ; a Sketch of the Life of the REv. PERE BEsson, of the Order of St. Dominic. Henri P errey ve. By A. GRATRY. Translated. S. Francis de Sales, Bishop and Prince of Geneva. The Revival of Priestly Life in the Seventeenth Century i n France. CHARLEs DE ConDREN–S. Philip NERI and CARDINAL DE BERULLE—S. VINCENT DE PAUL–SAINT SULPICE and JEAN JAQUES OLIER. A C hristian Painter of the Nineteenth Century; being the Life of HIPPolyte FLANDRIN. Bossuet a nd his Contemporaries. Fénelon, Archbishop of Cambrai. la ± | ERS. S NIN, TOULOUSE. HENRI D OMINIQUE LACORDAIRE Ø 1 5ío grapbital = kett) BY H.. L SIDNEY LEAR |\ a“In l sua Volum fade e mostra pace." PARADiso III. * t 1 . - - - - -, 1 - - - - VR I IN GT ON S WVA TER LOO PLACE, LONDO W MDCCCLXXXII *==v---------------- - - - - - PREF A CE. THIS s ketch of a great man and his career has been framed entirely upon his own writings—his Conferences and others—the contemporary literature, and the two Memoirs of him published by his dearest friend the Comte de Montalembert, and by his disciple and companion Dominican, Père Chocarne. I have aimed only at producing as true and as vivid a portrait of Lacordaire as lay in my power, believing that at all times, and specially such times as the present, such a study must tend to strengthen the cause of Right, the cause of true Liberty, above all, of Religious Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Ment in the Plan of the Eastern Limb of Any One
    NOTES ON THE HOLY BLOOD OF HAYLES.1 By W. H. ST. JOHN HOPE, M.A. Those who have given any attention to the develop- ment in the plan of the eastern limb of any one of our great cathedral, collegiate, or monastic churches are aware that, apart from the question of adding a lady chapel, any important eastern extension is usually due to the desire to build a chapel for the tomb or shrine of some person of great or particular sanctity connected with the church. Chichester, Ely, Rochester, Wells, Lincoln and Lichfield, Winchester and Worcester all afford examples, and to them may be added the most notable of all, the metropolitan church of Canterbury, concerning which we have the explicit statement of Gervase that William the Englishman in 1179 laid the foundation for the enlarge- ment of the church at the eastern part, because a chapel of St. Thomas was to be built there. To these and many others that could easily be named there has been added within the last few years another remarkable and unsuspected example in the Cistercian abbey of Hayles. The site of this was excavated by the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society in 1899 and carefully planned by Mr. Brakspear the following year, when it was found that the original square east end of the church had been replaced by a rounded apse with an outer ring of five polygonal chapels. In the middle of this uncommon arrangement was a rough block of masonry which had clearly formed the base of a shrine.
    [Show full text]
  • FAITH in SUSSEX Sitast Rei Pubitemporum Patiae in Satus; Nonsuliumus Auciam Husceri Consiliam Nonte Ta L
    ISSN 1363-4550 www.chichester.anglican.org ISSUE 1 FAITH IN SUSSEX Sitast rei pubitemporum Patiae in Satus; nonsuliumus auciam husceri Consiliam nonte ta L. Equonem inimil huit. Cercere conThe horum diocesan mum publicationostiem facireaching publicati, church crum communitiesnihilne ut across no. ereortis Sussex auctor pris iurnum Patum, coerdio, quo nossulium la quiturs ulusatrox nes? iae ret gra re dictum imacem, opoerei publia www.chichester.anglican.org dumum omnoc inequitrum, sultusa prisqui sedium ina nu et, ocre con Ita Seretea vis condit ocastemulici de nit. At iam am nocchil crum potilis cotiquero acchilnes num iam. simis tust it vilis conscri ssoltuiu egerfec ili tea nescibe rvivit quis medem senditus eo vero esi se patalerte, opotien terfece aciactus, Opules aucestrudam tanum firmis in con tus poertis. Huidem prissus me C. Habessi culvideri cupiem iam inam morum vis con det arione tris quodium pes? Nos nondet vis. Publii senterr avocaectum a nium igna publinam vivicast conenat idionsu publicae acchuctus. Virmis ia Sena, nost? Pat. amdist viliistam egerbis, demod no. Mulare, consta vestrav erfitab inpro ilnerce pecivir horum parei con emules,GET voc, quiumus,READY ma, FOR poteatum, Astifernihi, fachilibem, nost optius sena, Castiam oc ocae pra ignatil te inatortiumOUR ina WEEKEND quius, qua Satum tu aut etiqui ponvocc iemoltus ne tus; ibulici enderus etra, contiln eremoen vid prit, ut ponsta, que nos hocaece ex mis ca dis; hum, seresina, partem atienium vo, C. Vivivir mihilin Italari psenam.OF Simus PRAYER es cavocae / aces? 15 sicaecres? igna, contem din inves in conscio iam plica; Castiliam dieris. Upiocus actatis? Um. Maedo, quius, no. Scit iae consi in scre etissedius, Miliciondam se, ublium spere us effrei sedeatu intri convenihilic Palium autemqu astervis estimil aut L.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendicant Orders of the Middle Ages
    Mendicant Orders of the Middle Ages The Monks and Monasteries of the early Middle Ages played a critical roal in the preservation and promotion of Christian culture. The accomplishments of the monks, especially during the 'Dark Ages', are too numerous to list. They were the both missionaries and custodians of Catholic culture for generations, and the monastic reforms of the tenth century paved the way for the reforms of the secular clergy that followed. By the beginning of the 13th century, however, there was seen a need for a new type of religious community, and thus were born the Mendicant Orders. The word 'Mendicant' means beggar, and this was due to the fact that the Mendicant Friars, in contrast to the Benedictine Monks, lived primarily in towns, rather than on propertied estates. Since they did not own property, they were not beholden to secular rulers and were free to serve the poor, preach the gospel, and uphold Christian ideals without compromise. The Investiture Controversy of the previous century, and the underlying problems of having prelates appointed by and loyal to local princes, was one of the reasons for the formation of mendicant orders. Even though monks took a vow of personal poverty, they were frequently members of wealthy monasteries, which were alway prone to corruption and politics. The mendicant commitment to poverty, therefore, prohibited the holding of income producing property by the orders, as well as individuals. The poverty of the mendicant orders gave them great freedom, in the selection of their leaders, in the their mobility, and in their active pursuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Acordaire 1 :Ount D Haussonville
    ACORDAIRE 1 :OUNT D HAUSSONVILLE i 3RARY J. LACORDAIRE LACORDAIRE From a miniature by Mme. Delliens Frontispiece LACORDAIRE BY COUNT D HAUSSONVILLE OF THE FRENCH ACADEMY TRANSLATED BY A. W. EVANS B. Herder Herbert & Daniel 17 South Broadway 95 New Bond St. St. Louis, Mo. London, W. 1913 PREFACE PULPIT eloquence seems, in the history of litera ture, to be a peculiarly French gift. When we seek the finest models of the eloquence of the bar or of the tribune, it is to antiquity that we go, and no name has overshadowed those of Demosthenes and of Cicero. The England of the last two centuries has given us examples of Parlia mentary eloquence that can be compared with those which France has produced during the same epoch, and the speeches of Burke, of Fox, of Brougham, do not yield to those of Mirabeau, of de Serre, or of Berryer. But it is not the same with her preachers, whose inferiority Taine points &quot; out in his History of English Literature,&quot; and for pulpit eloquence no country is comparable with the land of Bossuet, of Bourdaloue, and of Massillon. If among the Fathers of the Church we meet with some who can be placed by their side, a Saint John Chrysostom, a Saint Gregory of Nazianzus, on the other hand, they are without rivals in the literature of modern peoples, and of this form of human thought it is assuredly the French language that offers the finest specimens. The ancients, with whose lives eloquence was so constantly mingled, said that the great orator has in him something divine &quot; aliquid divinum.&quot; Is not this especially true when he who has received the gift of expressing his thought by speech puts vi PREFACE this gift in the service, not of some human and passing cause, but of that which is eternal and Divine? In truth, he is at once a man of action and a man of thought, for at one stroke he agitates crowds and ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • John M. Hill Chaucer's Neoplatonism
    John M. Hill Chaucer’s Neoplatonism: Varieties of Love, Friendship, and Community Jonathan Fruoco To cite this version: Jonathan Fruoco. John M. Hill Chaucer’s Neoplatonism: Varieties of Love, Friendship, and Commu- nity. 2019. hal-01995227 HAL Id: hal-01995227 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01995227 Submitted on 26 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. JOHN M. HILL. Chaucer’s Neoplatonism: Varieties of Love, Friendship, and Community. Lanham-Boulder-New York-London, Lexington Books, 2018. Pp. 201. $95.00. It would certainly be difficult to count the number of monographs studying the Boethian nature of Geoffrey Chaucer’s poetry. Readers and literary critics from the past centuries have long recognised that connexion and studied how Chaucer went through The Consolation of Philosophy for his own understanding of Love’s binding principle, or for notions such as providence, fate, and free will. John M. Hill’s detailed analysis in Chaucer’s Neoplatonism: Varieties of Love, Friendship, and Community follows that critical tradition but accomplishes, however, a rare feat: indeed, for a study underlying the importance of old books in the production of new science, to paraphrase Chaucer, Hill brilliantly manages to absorb past criticism and to offer something new on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascent of the Soul in the Wife of Bath's Prologue And
    THE ASCENT OF THE SOUL IN THE WIFE OF BATH’S PROLOGUE AND TALE by Nicholas Dalbey A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English Middle Tennessee State University August 2018 Thesis Committee: Dr. Rhonda McDaniel Dr. Ted Sherman I dedicate this thesis to Justine and Calvin. Timshel. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. McDaniel for her patient guidance throughout the thesis process. I don’t know how many times I changed course during the research stage, but she always let me sit in her office and verbally process everything I’d read and discovered. Her feedback always pushed me in the right direction despite myself. I’d also like to thank Dr. Sherman for his generosity in reading and providing feedback on my final draft; I’m also grateful to have taken his Old English Literature and Beowulf courses which opened my eyes to the riches of medieval studies. My immediate family also provided much appreciated support during this process: my parents, Steve and Tami, and my brothers, Trevor and Spencer, frequently checked in with me and encouraged me. Finally, I know that I would not have been able to pursue graduate work without the love and support of my wife Justine. She deserves this MA as much as anyone, having been both a sounding board for my ideas as well as the emotional support necessary for the project’s completion. iii ABSTRACT Of the three women who participate in the tale-telling contest in Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, the Wife of Bath establishes herself as the most provocative and the most philosophically minded.
    [Show full text]