Johnson Defeats Corbyn in UK by Cnaan Liphshiz
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report
Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report: January 2019 to Present November 15, 2020 (Updated 02/22/2021) Prepared By: Rob Goldberg, Senior Director, Legislative Affairs [email protected] The following is a compilation of recent threat incidents, at home or abroad, targeting Jews and Jewish institutions (and other faith-based organization) that have been reported in the public record. When completing the Threat section of the IJ (Part III. Risk): ▪ First Choice: Describe specific terror (or violent homegrown extremist) incidents, threats, hate crimes, and/or related vandalism, trespass, intimidation, or destruction of property that have targeted its property, membership, or personnel. This may also include a specific event or circumstance that impacted an affiliate or member of the organization’s system or network. ▪ Second Choice: Report on known incidents/threats that have occurred in the community and/or State where the organization is located. ▪ Third Choice: Reference the public record regarding incidents/threats against similar or like institutions at home or abroad. Since there is limited working space in the IJ, the sub-applicant should be selective in choosing appropriate examples to incorporate into the response: events that are most recent, geographically proximate, and closely related to their type or circumstance of their organization or are of such magnitude or breadth that they create a significant existential threat to the Jewish community at large. I. Overview of Recent Federal Risk Assessments of National Significance Summary The following assessments underscore the persistent threat of lethal violence and hate crimes against the Jewish community and other faith- and community-based institutions in the United States. -
Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research. -
Trunews and Rick Wiles: "End Times" Anti- Semitism and Anti-Zionism
TruNews and Rick Wiles: "End Times" Anti- Semitism and Anti-Zionism Rick Wiles Updated January 13, 2020 UPDATE: On January 13, 2020, TruNews announced that Paypal, as well as the donor management companies Bloomerang and Spreedly, had stopped processing their donations. TruNews claims it is still able to process online credit card contributions via Stripe. In an anti-Semitic, conspiracy theory-laced letter to supporters, TruNews founder Rick Wiles ascribed the change to his coverage of "Israeli Mossad’s blackmail operation through the fake billionaire Jeffrey Epstein," adding that we live in "Bolshevik, Zionist America." 1 / 7 Wiles has devoted extensive TruNews coverage to the conspiracy theory that Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli agent who offered sex with underage girls to American politicians and businessmen in order to blackmail them into supporting Israel. "The success of Jeffrey Epstein’s blackmail operation explains how Israel secretly seized control of America over the past thirty years," Wiles said on the January 9, 2020 episode of TruNews. He continued, "The kosher coverup continues, where America’s elite, [are] working overtime to cover up the Israeli child sex blackmail operation that was going on in this country for at least thirty years." TruNews is a funfunfunfundamdamdamdamentalistentalistentalistentalist Christian ChristianChristianChristian streaming news and opinion platform that has increasingly featured anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist content, and also has a long record of disseminating radical Islamophobic and anti-LGBTQ messages. Founded in 1999 by Rick Wiles and affiliated with Flowing Streams Church in Vero Beach, FL, where Wiles is senior pastor, TruNews was previously known as America’s Hope, American Freedom News, and briefly as Christian News Channel. -
Is Religion Coming Back As a Source for Antisemitic Views?
religions Article Is Religion Coming Back as a Source for Antisemitic Views? Gunther Jikeli College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; [email protected] Received: 20 February 2020; Accepted: 13 March 2020; Published: 20 May 2020 Abstract: The most violent American and European antisemites in the 21st century, including not only Jihadists but also white (and black) supremacist terrorist, made some reference to religion in their hatred of Jews. This is surprising. Religious antisemitism is often seen as a relic of the past. It is more associated with pre-modern societies where the role of religion was central to the social and political order. However, at the end of the 19th century, animosity against Judaism gave way to nationalistic and racist motives. People such as Wilhelm Marr called themselves antisemites to distinguish themselves from those who despised Jews for religious reasons. Since then, antisemitism has gone through many mutations. However, today, it is not only the actions of extremely violent antisemites who might be an indication that religious antisemitism has come back in new forms. Some churches have been accused of disseminating antisemitic arguments related to ideas of replacement theology in modernized forms and applied to the Jewish State. Others, from the populist nationalist right, seem to use Christianity as an identity marker and thus exclude Jews (and Muslims) from the nation. Do religious motifs play a significant role in the resurgence of antisemitism in the 21st century? Keywords: religious antisemitism; supersessionism; replacement theory; Bowers; Poway; Pittsburgh; Jersey; Black Hebrew Israelites Religious antisemitism is often seen as a relic of the past. -
How to Get the Daily Stormer Be Found on the Next Page
# # Publishing online In print because since 2013, offline Stormer the (((internet))) & Tor since 2017. is censorship! The most censored publication in history Vol. 99 Daily Stormer ☦ Sunday Edition 07–14 Jul 2019 What is the Stormer? No matter which browser you choose, please continue to use Daily Stormer is the largest news publication focused on it to visit the sites you normally do. By blocking ads and track- racism and anti-Semitism in human history. We are signifi- ers your everyday browsing experience will be better and you cantly larger by readership than many of the top 50 newspa- will be denying income to the various corporate entities that pers of the United States. The Tampa Tribune, Columbus Dis- have participated in the censorship campaign against the Daily patch, Oklahoman, Virginian-Pilot, and Arkansas Democrat- Stormer. Gazette are all smaller than this publication by current read- Also, by using the Tor-based browsers, you’ll prevent any- ership. All of these have dozens to hundreds of employees one from the government to antifa from using your browsing and buildings of their own. All of their employees make more habits to persecute you. This will become increasingly rele- than anyone at the Daily Stormer. We manage to deliver im- vant in the years to come. pact greater than anyone in this niche on a budget so small you How to support the Daily Stormer wouldn’t believe. The Daily Stormer is 100% reader-supported. We do what Despite censorship on a historically unique scale, and The we do because we are attempting to preserve Western Civiliza- Daily Stormer becoming the most censored publication in his- tion. -
Antisemitism
Antisemitism: A Persistent Threat to Human Rights A Six-Month Review of Antisemitism’s Global Impact following the UN’s ‘Historic’ Report ANNEX Recent Antisemitic Incidents related to COVID-19 April 2020 North America • Canada o On April 19, an online prayer service by the the Shaarei Shomayim synagogue in Toronto was ‘Zoombombed’ by a number of individuals who yelled antisemitic insults at participants and used their screens to show pornography. Immigration Minister Marco Mendicino has condemned the incident saying anti-Semitism, hatred and division have no place anywhere in Canada. A Toronto police spokesperson said the incident was being investigated as a possible hate crime.1 • United States o Colorado: On November 1, 2019, the FBI arrested a 27 year-old man with white supremacist beliefs who had expressed antisemitic hatred on Facebook for attempting to bomb a synagogue in Pueblo, Colorado.2 o Massachusetts: On April 2, police discovered a homemade incendiary device at Ruth’s House, a Jewish assisted living residence in Longmeadow, Massachusetts. On April 15, police arrested John Michael Rathbun and charged him with two counts of attempted arson. It has been reported that a white supremacist organization operating on two unnamed social media platforms had specified Ruth’s House as one of two possible locations for committing a mass killing, with one user referring to it as “that jew nursing home in longmeadow massachusetts,” and that a calendar event potentially created by the same user listed April 3, 2020 as “jew killing day.”3 o Missouri: Timothy Wilson, a white supremacist who was active on two neo-Nazi channels on Telegram and had very recently posted that the COVID-19 pandemic “was engineered by Jews as a power grab,”4 was shot and killed on March 24 as FBI agents attempted to arrest him for plotting to blow up a hospital treating patients of the virus. -
Antisemitism: a Persistent Threat to Human Rights a Six-Month Review of Antisemitism’S Global Impact Following the UN’S ‘Historic’ Report
Antisemitism: A Persistent Threat to Human Rights A Six-Month Review of Antisemitism’s Global Impact following the UN’s ‘Historic’ Report April 2020 Summary In October 2019, Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, expressed alarm about a significant increase, since 2017, in reports of hostility, discrimination and violence motivated by antisemitism around the world.1 This report surveys antisemitic incidents that have occurred in the six months since Dr. Shaheed presented his report on the subject of antisemitism to the UN General Assembly. Alarmingly, antisemitic expression and violence appear to have persisted – and even increased – in a number of countries around the world between October and April 2020, notwithstanding efforts by governments and other stakeholders to implement Dr. Shaheed’s recommendations. The cases and trends highlighted in this report reveal that antisemitism remains a phenomenon that impairs the security and the human rights of many Jewish individuals, including the right to manifest their religion, and that it also threatens the rights of members of other minority communities and democratic societies as a whole. Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, in many countries, conspiracy theories claiming that Jews or Israel engineered or are deliberately spreading the virus, as well as age-old antisemitic tropes associating Jews with disease, have been spread in traditional media and online. Occasionally, Jewish people, communities, and institutions have been subjected to antisemitic harassment and threats of violence; in a few cases, antisemitic rhetoric seems to have played an important role in motivating attempted violent attacks against sites and individuals, Jewish and non-Jewish alike. -
Antisemitism Worldwide 2019 and the Beginning of 2020
The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities Moshe Kantor Database for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism Antisemitism Worldwide 2019 and the Beginning of 2020 This report is dedicated to Dr. Esther Webman of blessed memory, our dear friend and colleague, who passed away abruptly on June 16th 2020. Dina Porat, Head of the Kantor Center Editor-in-Chief Esther Webman z”l Editor Talia Naamat Kantor Center Researchers Lidia Lerner, Galia Radosh – Latin America Riva Mane – France Giovanni Quer – BDS and legal research Sarah Rembiszewski – Western Europe and Germany Raphael Vago – Romania Inna Shtakser – Post Soviet Union Contributors Esther Webman z”l– Arab Countries Michal Navoth and Benjamin Albalas (KIS) – Greece Argentina – Marisa Braylan (DAIA) Austria - Florian Zeller (FGA) Australia – Jeremy Jones and Julie Nathan Belgium - Joël Kotek (Sciences Po Paris) Brazil - Samuel Feldberg (The Dayan Center, TAU and the University of São Paulo) and Alexandre Almeida Canada – David Matas and Ran Ukashi (B’nai Brith) Chile - Gustavo Guzmán Czech Republic - Zbyněk Tarant (University of West Bohemia) European Union - Katharina von Schnurbein, European Commission Coordinator on combating Antisemitism and fostering Jewish life France – SPCJ Hungary – Inna Shtakser and Karl Pfiefer India -Navras J. Aafreedi Iran - Liora Hendelman-Baavur, Director of the Alliance Center for Iranian Studies, TAU Italy - Stefano Gatti and Betti Guetta (CDEC, Osservatorio Antisemitismo) Mexico - Renee Dayan Shabot (Tribuna Israelita) Moldova - Natalia -
Top-Ten-Anti-Semitic.Pdf
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER wiesenthal.com/TopTenAntiSemitic2019 #TopTenAntiSemitic2019 wiesenthal.com/TopTenAntiSemitic2019 JEREMY CORBYN-LED UK LABOUR PARTY ”How complicit in prejudice would a leader of Her Majesty’s opposition have to be in order to be considered 1 unfit for high office?” - Ephraim Mirvis, UK Chief Rabbi In a year awash with anti-Semitism on both sides of the Atlantic, no one has done more to mainstream anti-Semitism into the political and social life of a democracy than the Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour Party. Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis warned that anti-Jewish racism was a new poison that had taken root in the party. In the words of MP Louise Ellman, “How many Jewish members have been bullied, abused and driven out?” Members and staff who have dared to speak out against the hate were purged, but not those who declared ‘Heil Hitler’ and ’F*ck the Jews’ or ‘Jews are the problem’. No wonder a poll of the Jewish Leadership Council found that 47% of respondents said they would consider leaving the UK if Corbyn became prime minister. Postscript: The SWC released its #1 choice for its Top Ten 2019 list five days before the UK election. Corbyn’s Labour was trounced by PM Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party in the December 12th elections. Some analysts say that anti-Semitism impacted the voters. Corbyn has resigned as leader of the Labour Party. DEADLY DOMESTIC TERRORISTS TARGET JEWS IN THE US AND GERMANY 2 In Jersey City, NJ, a kosher market was the target of domestic terrorists. David Anderson and Francine Graham were adherents of the Black Hebrew Israelites hate group. -
THE HATER NEXT DOOR: Online Incitement Against Minorities in America
THE HATER NEXT DOOR: Online Incitement Against Minorities In America Published by MEMRI and the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice Chief Researcher: Michael Davis Table of Contents Introduction Page 5 Executive Summary & Examples of Online Incitement Page 9 General Research Characteristics Page 15 General Content Characteristics Page 17 Calls to Action Page 23 Sources of Online Incitement Page 29 • Groups and Organizations Page 29 • Individuals Page 35 • Social Media Platforms Page 37 Appendices Page 39 • Cartoons & Memes Page 40 • Images Page 44 • Texts Page 49 Endnotes Page 61 3 Introduction Dr. Katrina Lantos Swett While the 21 st century has inaugurated an era of remarkable innovation and progress largely driven by the digital revolution, this new century has also seen a resurgence of old evils and hatreds. Anti-Semitism, racism and other pathological hostilities are being disseminated and weaponized using some of the same digital innovations that we celebrate in so many spheres of life. Like nuclear energy and other developments in modern technology, the internet is both a blessing to humanity and a threat to human life. While other such developments have been subjected to regulation, so as to avoid this threat, the internet has enjoyed unlicensed freedom. America’s reverence for free speech has enabled extremists and radicals of all kinds to utilize the internet to promote their murderous agendas. The global jihadi movement owes its existence to the internet, which it uses as a highway for hatred and incitement. Nazis, white supremacists, fascists, racists and others take advantage of the internet in the same way, which leads to the inevitable result: the targeting of innocent people. -
June 2020 Volume 21 Number 2
June 2020 Volume 21 Number 2 Newsletter of the ECPR Standing Group on Extremism & Democracy e-Extreme Managing Editors Fred Paxton, European University Institute Patricia Rodi, Queen Mary University of London Book Review Liaison Harry Edwards, University of Greenwich E&D Steering Committee Caterina Froio, Sciences Po Andrea L. P. Pirro, Scuola Normale Superiore Stijn van Kessel, Queen Mary University of London The e-Extreme is the newsletter of the ECPR Standing Group on Extremism & Democracy. For any enquiries about the newsletter and book reviews, please contact the managing editors ([email protected]). Copyright © 2020 by the ECPR Standing Group on Extremism & Democracy. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission in writing from the ECPR Standing Group on Extremism & Democracy. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Standing Group announcements 4 Calls and upcoming events 7 Symposium: Radical Politics during the Coronavirus Crisis 11 Book reviews 19 Publications alert 29 Contacts 38 3 STANDING GROUP ANNOUNCEMENTS NEW EDITORIAL BOARD This issue welcomes a new editorial team for e-Extreme. The new managing editors are: Fred Paxton, who is pursuing a PhD at the European University Institute with a project on populist radical right parties in local government, and Patricia Rodi, PhD candidate at Queen Mary University of London researching the mainstreaming of populism in West- ern Europe. Patricia has already served as book review editor for the e-Extreme, and our publication has thrived in no small part thanks to her initiative. Dear e-Extreme readers, We hope you’re well, wherever you may be - whether locked down or gradually getting back to normal life. -
Adversarial Narratives: a New Model for Disinformation
Adversarial Narratives: A New Model for Disinformation www.disinformationindex.org Author: Ben Decker Editor: Craig Fagan Design: Dan Smith, www.skyboydesign.com Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank the following individuals for their review of and guidance on the paper: Yasmin Green (Jigsaw) and Mick West. The Global Disinformation Index is a UK-based not-for-proft that operates on the three principles of neutrality, independence and transparency. Our vision is a world in which we can trust what we see in the media. Our mission is to restore trust in the media by providing real-time automated risk ratings of the world’s media sites through a Global Disinformation Index (GDI). For more information, visit www.disinformationindex.org Aug 2019. Published under a Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Table of contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 5 Setting out the model: Adversarial narratives 6 The model: Adversarial networked confict 8 The disinformation actors 11 The case study: Stop 5G 13 Conclusions 19 Endnotes 21 www.disinformationindex.org 3 Adversarial Narratives: A New Model for Disinformation Executive summary • Today’s online threat landscape is signifcantly more complex and blended, which may lead to many abusive and harmful behaviours slipping through the gaps of current moderation models. • Disinformation agents, both domestic and foreign, have a large library of content to draw from in crafting new adversarial narratives. In practice this means less overtly fabricated pieces of content. • Adversarial narratives like “Stop 5G” are effective because they infame social tensions by exploiting and amplifying perceived grievances of individuals, groups and institutions.