DOCSLIB.ORG

Korea Strategic Outcomes Vitta Q8 Summary Report Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Korea Strategic Outcomes Vitta Q8 Summary Report Final July 2018 Key Actor Interests in the Asia Pacific ® A Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa) Report Produced in support of the Deeper Analyses Clarifying Insights Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA) Office Better Decisions (Joint Staff, J39) www.NSIteam.com Key Actor Interests in the Asia Pacific 2 Authors Dr. Allison Astorino-Courtois Weston Aviles Dr. Belinda Bragg Dr. Larry Kuznar Nicole Peterson George Popp Dr. John A. Stevenson Please direct inquiries to George Popp at [email protected] What is ViTTa®? NSI’s Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa) provides rapid response to critical information needs by pulsing a global network of subject matter experts (SMEs) to generate a wide range of expert insight. For this Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA) Strategic Outcomes on the Korean Peninsula project, ViTTa was used to address eight key questions provided by the Joint Staff project sponsors. The ViTTa team received written response submissions from 50 subject matter experts from academia, government, military, and industry. Each Korea Strategic Outcomes ViTTa report presents 1) a summary overview of the expert contributor response to the ViTTa question of focus and 2) the full corpus of expert contributor responses received for the ViTTa question of focus. Biographies for all expert contributors are also included in each report. RESEARCH ▪ INNOVATIONNSI ▪ EXCELLENCE Key Actor Interests in the Asia Pacific 3 Table of Contents ViTTa Question ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Subject Matter Expert Contributors ........................................................................................................................ 4 Summary Response ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 References ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 China ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Indonesia .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Japan ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Malaysia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 North Korea ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34 North Korea (As Presented in Kim Jong Un’s Public Discourse) .......................................................................................................................................... 35 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Philippines ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41 Russia .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 South Korea ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 50 United States ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 52 References .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Subject Matter Expert Response Submissions ................................................................................................... 59 Dr. Stephen Blank.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Dr. Richard Cronin .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 60 Dr. Rod Lyon ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 61 Shihoko Goto ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62 Anthony Rinna ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 63 Dr. Sheila Smith........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 Yun Sun ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Kelly Wadsworth ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Subject Matter Expert Biographies ........................................................................................................................ 68 Dr. Stephen Blank.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 68 Dr. Richard Cronin .................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Korea Section 3
    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea's Mistake on China's ADIZ Controversy
    Korea’s Mistake on China’s ADIZ Controversy By Dr. Victor Cha December 2, 2013 Victor Cha is a senior adviser and the inaugural holder of the Korea Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He is also director of Asian studies and holds the D.S. Song-KF Chair in the Department of Government and School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. From 2004 to 2007, he served as director for Asian affairs at the White House on the National Security Council (NSC), where he was responsible primarily for Japan, the Korean peninsula, Australia/New Zealand, and Pacific Island nation affairs. Dr. Cha was also the deputy head of delegation for the United States at the Six-Party Talks in Beijing and received two Outstanding Service Commendations during his tenure at the NSC. He is the award-winning author of Alignment Despite Antagonism: The United States- Korea-Japan Security Triangle (Stanford University Press, 1999), winner of the 2000 Ohira Book Prize; Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies, with Dave Kang (Columbia University Press, 2004); Beyond the Final Score: The Politics of Sport in Asia (Columbia University Press, 2009); and The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future (Ecco, 2012. Dr. Cha holds a B.A., an M.I.A., and a Ph.D. from Columbia University, as well as an M.A. from Oxford University. The Republic of Korea appropriately protested China’s November 23 announcement of the creation of the East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) through foreign ministry and defense ministry channels last week.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseonhakgyo, Learning Under North Korean Leadership: Transitioning from 1970 to Present*
    https://doi.org/10.33728/ijkus.2020.29.1.007 International Journal of Korean Unification Studies Vol. 29, No. 1, 2020, 161-188. Joseonhakgyo, Learning under North Korean Leadership: Transitioning from 1970 to Present* Min Hye Cho** This paper analyzes English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks used during North Korea’s three leaderships: 1970s, 1990s and present. The textbooks have been used at Korean ethnic schools, Joseonhakgyo (朝鮮学校), which are managed by the Chongryon (總聯) organization in Japan. The organization is affiliated with North Korea despite its South Korean origins. Given North Korea’s changing influence over Chongryon’s education system, this study investigates how Chongryon Koreans’ view on themselves has undergone a transition. The textbooks’ content that have been used in junior high school classrooms (students aged between thirteen and fifteen years) are analyzed. Selected texts from these textbooks are analyzed critically to delineate the changing views of Chongryon Koreans. The findings demonstrate that Chongryon Koreans have changed their perspective from focusing on their ties to North Korea (1970s) to focusing on surviving as a minority group (1990s) to finally recognising that they reside permanently in Japan (present). Keywords: EFL textbooks, Korean ethnic school, minority education, North Koreans in Japan, North Korean leadership ** Acknowledgments: The author would like to acknowledge the generous and thoughtful support of the staff at Hagusobang (Chongryon publishing company), including Mr Nam In Ryang, Ms Kyong Suk Kim and Ms Mi Ja Moon; Ms Malryo Jang, an English teacher at Joseonhakgyo; and Mr Seong Bok Kang at Joseon University in Tokyo. They have consistently provided primary resource materials, such as Chongryon EFL textbooks, which made this research project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Evangelistic Strategies for North Korean Defectors (Talbukmin) in South Korea
    ABSTRACT Effective Evangelistic Strategies for North Korean Defectors (Talbukmin) in South Korea South Korean churches eagerness for spreading the gospel to North Koreans is a passion. However, because of the barriers between the two Koreas, spreading the Good News is nearly impossible. In the middle of the 1990’s, numerous North Koreans defected to China to avoid starvation. Many South Korean missionaries met North Koreans directly and offered the gospel along with necessities for survival in China. Since the early of 2000’s, many Talbukmin have entered South Korea so South Korean churches have directly met North Koreans and spread the gospel. However, the fruits of evangelism are few. South Korean churches find that Talbukmin are very different from South Koreans in large part due to the sixty-year division. South Korean churches do not know or fully understand the characteristics of the Talbukmin. The evangelism strategies and ministry programs of South Korean churches, which are designed for South Koreans, do not adapt well to serve the Talbukmin. This research lists and describes the following five theories to be used in the development of the effective evangelistic strategies for use with the Talbukmin and for use to interpret the interviews and questionnaires: the conversion theory, the contextualization theory, the homogenous principle, the worldview transformation theory, and the Nevius Mission Plan. In the following research exploration of the evangelization of Talbukmin in South Korea occurs through two major research agendas. The first agenda is concerned with the study of the characteristics of Talbukmin to be used for the evangelists’ understanding of the depth of differences.
    [Show full text]
  • ZRP BRIEF SEPT 2017.Indd
    Brief: 15/2017/FOLDER3 KDN No.: PP 12857/08/2013 (032657) Thank you for making us Employer of Choice 2017 A BRIEF CONTENTS NOTE... page 2 by Dato’ Zulkifl y Rafi que IN-BRIEF... Th e highlights in this Folder include: On managing millennials... • Advocates Ordinance Sabah amended • Court of Appeal ruling on ‘right’ to travel Many of us have discussed, debated and • Landmark ruling on Islamic family law deliberated upon the generation known as the • Pedra Branca dispute “Millennials”. Broadly speaking, Millennials • Sexual Off ences against Children Act 2017 are those born from 1982 to 1995, also • Tourism tax from 1 September known as Gen-Y (Generation Y), who grew • Germany: “NO” to accessing Facebook account up in the age of internet, smart phones • Th ailand: 10-year visa for retirees and social media, and who are identifi ed as • UK: New Lord Chief Justice appointed technologically adept. With the evolution of legal services, law page 4 fi rms are now populated by Millennials, all of whom with diff erent working styles and BRIEFING... ethics. Th us, it is important for law fi rms to Amongst the articles in our features: take certain measures in order to bridge that • KLRCA Arbitration Rules... An update generational gap and manage the working • Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2017 force in the best possible way. • Taking the LEAP! We, at ZUL RAFIQUE & partners, acknowledge that a law fi rm’s best asset is talent. We, therefore, strive to adapt to the page 10 requirements of the driving workforce by DEBRIEF... introducing various training programmes on soft skills and legal skills.
    [Show full text]
  • The East China Sea: North Asian Energy Hub?
    The East China Sea: North Asian Energy Hub? Qingdao Ximeng-Wuxi, 2018 Yellow Sea Basin Pusan Theoretical Median Cheju Do Jiuquan-Jiangsu, 2016 (South Korea) Fukuoka Shaanxi-Jiangsu, 2016 Socotra Rock Jiangsu Wuxi Yacheng Cheju Kagoshima Basin Theoretical Median Japan-South Korea Xiangjiaba-Shanghai, 2010 JDA Jingping-Sunan, 2012 Longjing Pingbei Haijiao China- Pinghu Japan Field Yuquan Joint Development Zone Xihu (2008) Lishui Field Theoretical Median Daiyos/Senkakus Okinawa Conoco- Philips Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands Tachao Basin Tainam Basin Gaolan Terminal Liwan 3-1 Panyu Panyu 4-1 3-2 Panyu 3-1 1 Bullet Points: By 2050, China, Japan and South Korea could be connected by an East China Sea energy infrastructure. “We need to start building the infrastructure to meet the deadlines that nature will impose on us.” Benefits: Tim Flannery Environmental Author 1. It would raise cross-border energy trade. This would increase Australian Of the Year (2007) efficiency, lower prices and raise supply security.Together, the three represent a huge market. 2. Each country could serve as a source of reserve supply for the other two, given asynchronous energy demand profiles. Northern China’s peak demand is for winter heating. Japan and South Korea’s peak demand is for summer air conditioning. Sharing seasonally- idled capacity benefits all three. 3. Geopolitical benefits would ensue from cooperative infrastructure.- This would reduce the risk of conflict over territorial disputes. 4. Extending infrastructure penetration into the East China Sea would speed development of new energy sources. These could include including wind power, tidal power and ocean thermal energy conversion and solar.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You, Father Kim Il Sung” Is the First Phrase North Korean Parents Are Instructed to Teach to Their Children
    “THANK YOU FATHER KIM ILLL SUNG”:”:”: Eyewitness Accounts of Severe Violations of Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion in North Korea PPPREPARED BYYY: DAVID HAWK Cover Photo by CNN NOVEMBER 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Michael Cromartie Chair Felice D. Gaer Vice Chair Nina Shea Vice Chair Preeta D. Bansal Archbishop Charles J. Chaput Khaled Abou El Fadl Dr. Richard D. Land Dr. Elizabeth H. Prodromou Bishop Ricardo Ramirez Ambassador John V. Hanford, III, ex officio Joseph R. Crapa Executive Diretor NORTH KOREA STUDY TEAM David Hawk Author and Lead Researcher Jae Chun Won Research Manager Byoung Lo (Philo) Kim Research Advisor United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Staff Tad Stahnke, Deputy Director for Policy David Dettoni, Deputy Director for Outreach Anne Johnson, Director of Communications Christy Klaasen, Director of Government Affairs Carmelita Hines, Director of Administration Patricia Carley, Associate Director for Policy Mark Hetfield, Director, International Refugee Issues Eileen Sullivan, Deputy Director for Communications Dwight Bashir, Senior Policy Analyst Robert C. Blitt, Legal Policy Analyst Catherine Cosman, Senior Policy Analyst Deborah DuCre, Receptionist Scott Flipse, Senior Policy Analyst Mindy Larmore, Policy Analyst Jacquelin Mitchell, Executive Assistant Tina Ramirez, Research Assistant Allison Salyer, Government Affairs Assistant Stephen R. Snow, Senior Policy Analyst Acknowledgements The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom expresses its deep gratitude to the former North Koreans now residing in South Korea who took the time to relay to the Commission their perspectives on the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and their experiences in North Korea prior to fleeing to China.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea of Japan a Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Security
    The Long Littoral Project: Sea of Japan A Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Security Michael A. McDevitt • Dmitry Gorenburg Cleared for Public Release IRP-2013-U-002322-Final February 2013 Strategic Studies is a division of CNA. This directorate conducts analyses of security policy, regional analyses, studies of political-military issues, and strategy and force assessments. CNA Strategic Studies is part of the global community of strategic studies institutes and in fact collaborates with many of them. On the ground experience is a hallmark of our regional work. Our specialists combine in-country experience, language skills, and the use of local primary-source data to produce empirically based work. All of our analysts have advanced degrees, and virtually all have lived and worked abroad. Similarly, our strategists and military/naval operations experts have either active duty experience or have served as field analysts with operating Navy and Marine Corps commands. They are skilled at anticipating the “problem after next” as well as determining measures of effectiveness to assess ongoing initiatives. A particular strength is bringing empirical methods to the evaluation of peace-time engagement and shaping activities. The Strategic Studies Division’s charter is global. In particular, our analysts have proven expertise in the following areas: The full range of Asian security issues The full range of Middle East related security issues, especially Iran and the Arabian Gulf Maritime strategy Insurgency and stabilization Future national security environment and forces European security issues, especially the Mediterranean littoral West Africa, especially the Gulf of Guinea Latin America The world’s most important navies Deterrence, arms control, missile defense and WMD proliferation The Strategic Studies Division is led by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of Freedom of Religion Or Belief in North Korea
    Total denial: violations of freedom of religion or belief in North Korea September 2016 FOR PUBLIC USE Be a voice for the voiceless www.csw.org.uk Contents Executive summary 3 Recommendations 4 Christian Solidarity Worldwide and North Korea 5 Methodology 5 Freedom of religion or belief in theory 6 International law vs North Korean law on freedom of religion or belief 6 Ideological foundation vs concept of religious freedom 7 Freedom of religion or belief in practice 8 Persecution of Christians 9 Political prison camps (kwanliso) 10 Discrimination against Buddhism and Shamanism 11 Detention in China 12 Repatriation from China 13 Engagement with international faith groups and organisations 14 Conclusion 15 ‘There is almost complete denial of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as well as the right to freedom of opinion, expression, information and association’ UN Commission of Inquiry report on North Korea, 2014 Cover image: Statue in North Korea Photo: CSW extermination, enslavement/forced labour, forcible Executive summary transfer of population, arbitrary imprisonment, torture, persecution, enforced disappearance, rape and sexual The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), violence, and other inhumane acts. Documented incidents also known as North Korea, remains a uniquely isolated against Christians include being hung on a cross over a and repressed state in an increasingly interconnected fire, crushed under a steamroller, herded off bridges, global community. The isolation is maintained by and trampled underfoot. A policy of guilt by association multi-faceted aspects of the security and political applies, meaning that the relatives of Christians are also situation, and confines the people of North Korea to a detained regardless of whether they share the Christian monolithic system of control by the dynastic Kim family.
    [Show full text]
  • Disputes Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication 6-2014 Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Dexin Tian Savannah College of Art and Design, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Chao, Chin-Chung and Tian, Dexin, "Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies" (2014). Communication Faculty Publications. 85. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub/85 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 19-47 ISSN: 2333-5866 (Print), 2333-5874 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao1 and Dexin Tian2 Abstract This study explores the communication tactics and grand strategies of each of the involved parties in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands disputes. Under the theoretical balance between liberal
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident
    Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan October 2010 1 Senkaku Islands ◦ Location ◦ The Basic Facts of the Senkaku Islands Obstruction of the execution of official duty by a Chinese fishing trawler (September 7, 2010) Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations Japan’s Position (Statement by MOFA Press Secretary on September 25 2010) 2 China 330km Uotsuri-Shima Okinawa 170km 410km Japan 170km Taiwan Ishigaki-Shima East China Sea Main island of Okinawa Ishigaki-Shima Kuba-Shima Taisho-To About 27km About Uotsuri-Shima 110km Kitako-Shima About 5km Minamiko-Shima ◦ From 1885 on, the Senkaku Islands had been thoroughly surveyed by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, it was confirmed that the Senkaku Islands had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of China. Based on this confirmation, the Government of Japan made a Cabinet Decision on 14 January 1895 to erect a marker on the Islands to formally incorporate the Senkaku Islands into the territory of Japan. ◦ Since then, the Senkaku Islands have continuously remained as an integral part of the Nansei Shoto Islands which are the territory of Japan. These islands were neither part of Taiwan nor part of the Pescadores Islands which were ceded to Japan from the Qing Dynasty of China in accordance with Article II of the Treaty of Shimonoseki which came into effect in May of 1895. ◦ Accordingly, the Senkaku Islands are not included in the territory which Japan renounced under Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles Fire and Fury
    US-KOREA RELATIONS MISSILES FIRE AND FURY STEPHEN NOERPER, KOREA SOCIETY AND COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Tensions rose to new levels on the Korean Peninsula as North Korea fired multiple missiles demonstrating markedly enhanced capabilities and crowned the Labor Day weekend with a sixth nuclear test with a significantly larger yield than previous tests. The United States tackled its most significant global security challenge by reinforcing its deterrent capabilities, tightening the financial noose on the North, President Trump tweeting stern warnings, and military and diplomatic leaders calling for dialogue. South Korea responded by reiterating its military readiness, expanding its own missile capabilities, and reeling from Trump’s rhetoric that likened President Moon Jae-in’s push for talks to “appeasement” and his threat to scrap the KORUS trade agreement. Despite joint military exercises, live fire drills, B-1 dispatches, and shared statements condemning Pyongyang to signal alliance strength, the relationship between the United States and South Korea appears frayed in dramatic new ways. This article is extracted from Comparative Connections: A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 19, No. 2, September 2017. pp 35-42 US-KOREA RELATIONS | SEPTEMBER 2017 35 No more maybes free trade agreement (FTA) were a slap in the face of the new Seoul administration. South In 11 years, North Korea has developed Korean President Moon Jae-in met Trump on dangerous nuclear and delivery capabilities. The June 30, and the Washington summit seemed to premier national security concern conveyed go well. South Korea put great preparation into from the Obama to Trump administration has the meeting and looked to Trump’s meetings seen fruition with the July 4 and July 28 with Japan’s Prime Minister Abe Shinzo and Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) China’s President Xi Jinping for lessons learned.
    [Show full text]