23 June 2014 at 2:00 Pm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

23 June 2014 at 2:00 Pm Confirmed Minutes of the 127th Meeting of the Environmental Impact Assessment Subcommittee held on 23 June 2014 at 2:00 pm Present: Dr Dorothy CHAN, BBS (Chairperson) Dr HUNG Wing-tat, MH (Deputy Chairman) Dr Gary ADES Prof CHAU Kwai-cheong, JP Dr HAU Chi-hang, Billy Prof FUNG Tung Prof NG Cheuk-yee, John Miss NG Yuen-ting, Yolanda Dr TSANG Po-keung, Eric Prof YEP Kin-man, Ray Miss Evelyn LEUNG (Secretary) Absent with Apologies: Prof TAM Fung-yee, Nora, BBS, JP Mr WONG Lok-tak, Luther Prof LI Xiang-dong Dr YIP Chee-hang, Eric In Attendance: Mr K F TANG Assistant Director (Environmental Assessment), EPD Mr Y K CHAN Assistant Director (Conservation), Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) Ms Joanne CHIN Executive Officer (CBD), EPD Ms Daicie TONG Executive Manager (CBD), EPD In Attendance for Agenda Item 3: Mr Ken WONG Principal Environmental Protection Officer (Metro Assessment), EPD Mr Steve LI Senior Environmental Protection Officer (Metro Assessment)3, EPD Project Proponent Team Mr Arthur WONG Project Development Director, Ocean Park Corporation Mr Stephen CHENG Executive Director, Aedas Ltd. Mr Eric CHING Associate, Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Ltd. (Mott MacDonald) Ms Funny WU Principal Environmental Consultant, Mott MacDonald Mr Gary CHOW Senior Environmental Consultant, Mott MacDonald Mr CHAN Pak-kin Environmental Consultant, Mott MacDonald Ms Heidi YU Environmental Consultant, Mott MacDonald ****************************** Action Item 1 : Confirmation of the draft minutes of the 126th meeting held on 19 May 2014 The draft minutes were confirmed without amendment. Item 2: Matters arising from the minutes of the last meeting 2. The Chairperson informed that in response to the suggestion of inviting relevant authorities to give Members an overview of the cumulative impacts imposed by the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) projects in the Lantau area, the Secretariat had arranged the Highways Department to brief the full Council on the environmental performance of the HZMB projects at the ACE meeting to be held on 21 July. 3. The Chairperson informed Members that the EIA report on “Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System” (the 3RS EIA report) was on public inspection between 20 June and 19 July. The EIA report had been selected for submission to ACE. EIASC meetings had been scheduled on 11 August (full day), 13 August (AM session) and 18 August (PM session) to discuss the objectives of and the key environmental aspects covered in the 3RS EIA report, and for consolidating its recommendation to the full Council. Non-EIASC Members would be invited to join the discussion. The Chairperson also encouraged Members to attend the public forum organized by the Airport Authority Hong Kong on 28 June. She had also asked the Secretariat to explore the practicability of setting Secretariat up a data centre where Members could access the relevant materials on the 3RS EIA report and the public comments received for Members’ reference before EIASC would meet on 11 August. Item 3 : EIA Report on“Tai Shue Wan Development at Ocean Park” (ACE-EIA Paper 2/2014) Internal Discussion Session 4. The Chairperson advised that today’s meeting would discuss the EIA report on “Tai Shue Wan Development at Ocean Park”. It was a designated project under “Schedule 2” of the EIA Ordinance (EIAO). The public inspection period of the report was from 20 May 2014 to 18 June 2014. The main concerns were related to protection / improvement of the roosting site for ardeids. As an administrative arrangement, public comments and the gist of major issues / concerns received by EPD had been circulated to Members for reference before the meeting. Written response from the project proponent (i.e. the Ocean Park Corporation, OPC) to the questions raised by Members had also been circulated for Members’ information before the meeting. - 2 - Action 5. The Chairperson informed Members that the discussion of the EIA report would be divided into the following four sessions – (a) Internal Discussion Session (b) Presentation Session (c) Question-and-Answer Session (d) Internal Discussion Session The Presentation Session and Question-and-Answer Session would be opened to the public. The Internal Discussion Sessions and all other parts of the meeting would remain closed. 6. The Chairperson asked Members if they had any interest to declare. A Member declared that he was a member of the Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Scientific Advisory Committee which advised OPC on funding conservation projects. He advised that the Committee had no involvement in the present EIA report to be discussed. The meeting agreed that the Member could stay and continue participating in the discussion. 7. The Chairperson reminded Members to keep confidentiality of the discussion on the EIA report as the full Council had yet to consider the Subcommittee’s recommendations before tendering its comments on the report under the EIAO. Members were advised to refer any enquiries to the Secretariat for follow up in case they were approached on the discussion and/or decision of the Subcommittee. 8. For a more structured and focused discussion, the Chairperson suggested and Members agreed to raise questions on the key subject areas of the EIA report in the order of – (a) Ecology (b) Visual and landscape impacts (c) Air quality and noise impacts (d) Water conservation [The project proponent team joined the meeting at this juncture.] Presentation Session (Open Session) 9. Mr Stephen Cheng first gave an overview of the need and the layout of the Tai Shue Wan Development (the Project), followed by Mr Eric Ching who briefed Members on the different environmental aspects of the EIA report. 10. In reply to the question from a Member during the powerpoint presentation that the table comparing the total number of night-roosting ardeids in Ap Lei Chau and Tai Shue Wan areas should give a full-year picture instead of from August to November 2013, Mr Eric Ching explained that the table served to give a direct - 3 - Action comparison of the findings of the EIA report with the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) findings collected for the South Island Line project, which had used data for these four months only for the study. Question-and-Answer Session (Open Session) Ecology 11. A Member enquired if the project proponent would first re-provision the Flamingo Pond in the south-western part of the project site as an alternative roosting site for ardeids and other wild birds before commencement of construction works of the Project. He further enquired if there were any developments associated with the Flamingo Pond that might cause disturbance in the vicinity of the re-provisioned Flamingo Pond. Mr Eric Ching said that there would not be any water rides or major human activities in the vicinity of the area which could serve as a buffer area between the new Water Park main campus and the Ecological Enhancement Area. Mr Arthur Wong supplemented that they were willing to consider the practicability of advancing the re-provisioning of the Flamingo Pond, taking into account the schedules of other construction works of the Project. 12. In response to a Member’ concern on the possible impact on the northern and eastern streams in the project site, Mr Gary Chow informed that the current project design would avoid construction works on the eastern stream completely. Having regard that the northern stream was only a seasonal seepage with slow water flow, any impact imposed on it arising from the project would be insignificant. 13. Regarding the concern on the drop in the number of birds in Tai Shue Wan, Mr Arthur Wong said that egrets were noted to have moved out of the project site since mid 2013. The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (HKBWS) had advanced a suggestion that the previous presence of flamingos might have provided certain assurance to egrets that the area was safe. Egrets probably sought alternative roosting site when the flamingos were removed. Woodland loss and compensation planting 14. A Member asked for clarification on the different terminologies used in the EIA report for permanent woodland loss, temporary woodland loss, woodland compensation and woodland reinstatement. Mr Eric Ching explained that felling trees and planting them back later in situ was regarded as temporary woodland loss as the woodland would be reinstated in the same locality after the trees were planted back. The Member opined that tree felling already represented a permanent loss of the woodland as the trees newly planted could never be of the exact species and comparable maturity as those which had been felled. Two Members echoed that the newly planted trees might not re-create the same ecological functions that originally existed in the area. 15. A Member asked for details of the compensatory tree planting plan including the objectives, species to be selected, as well as the management and - 4 - Action monitoring of the planted trees. Another Member also asked about the criteria for selecting the species. Mr Chan Pak-kin replied that they would plant native species in the woodland compensation area. As the site had a direct marine frontage, they would select species with high tolerance to strong wind and salt sprays. The species should be those currently existed in the area that could adapt to the unique site conditions. They would also select those species that were the roosting substrates for ardeids. In answering a Member’s further question that only four species were named in the EIA report for planting in the compensated woodland areas, Mr Eric Ching said that the tree planting list was not meant to be exhaustive, and the four species named were for general reference purpose. Mr Arthur Wong supplemented that the species to be planted basically would be the same as those currently being identified in the local environment.
Recommended publications
  • Administration's Paper on Mass Transit Railway South Island Line
    File Ref.: THB(T)CR 17/1016/99 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BRIEF MASS TRANSIT RAILWAY SOUTH ISLAND LINE INTRODUCTION At the meeting of the Executive Council on 18 December 2007, the Council ADVISED and the Chief Executive ORDERED that – (a) the MTRCL should be asked to proceed with the preliminary planning and design of SIL (East); (b) negotiations with the MTRCL on the detailed scope, cost and implementation programme for SIL (East) should commence; (c) the Wong Chuk Hang Estate site should be reserved for the SIL depot with above-depot private property development, and the site to the north of the Ocean Park Station should be reserved for private property development with associated park and ride facilities, both subject to rezoning approval; and (d) Route 4 and the MTRCL’s proposed SIL (West) should continue to be kept under review. 2. The background on the SIL (East), SIL (West) and Route 4 is set out at Annex. JUSTIFICATIONS Transport and Economic Justifications Traffic Congestion along Aberdeen Tunnel 3. The residential and commercial nodes in the Southern District mainly stretch along two clusters with one on the west, namely the Cyberport, Pok Fu Lam, Wah Fu Estate and Aberdeen, and another lying to the east, namely South Horizons, Lei Tung Estate, Wong Chuk Hang and the Ocean Park. In going to the city areas, the former cluster relies more on Pokfulam Road and Victoria Road, and the latter on the Aberdeen Tunnel. The Southern District is the only remaining district Page 1 in Hong Kong with no rail service. 4. At present, traffic piles back from the Cross Harbour Tunnel and Causeway Bay daily in the peak hours and in turn causes congestion in the Aberdeen Tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Campus Attractions, Restaurants and Shopping
    Off-Campus Attractions, Restaurants and Shopping The places listed in this guide are within 30 – 35 minutes travel time via public transportation from HKU. The listing of malls and restaurants is suggested as a resource to visitors but does not reflect any endorsement of any particular establishment. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information, you may check the website of the restaurant or mall for the most updated information. For additional information on getting around using public transports in Hong Kong, enter the origin and destination into the website: http://hketransport.gov.hk/?l=1&slat=0&slon=0&elat=0&elon=0&llon=12709638.92104&llat=2547711.355213 1&lz=14 or . For more information on discovering Hong Kong, please visit http://www.discoverhongkong.com/us/index.jsp or . Please visit https://www.openrice.com/en/hongkong or for more information on food and restaurants in Hong Kong. Man Mo Temple Address: 124-126 Hollywood Road, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong Island How to get there: MTR Sheung Wan Station Exit A2 then walk along Hillier Street to Queen's Road Central. Then proceed up Ladder Street (next to Lok Ku Road) to Hollywood Road to the Man Mo Temple. Open hours: 08:00 am – 06:00 pm Built in 1847, is one of the oldest and the most famous temples in Hong Kong and this remains the largest Man Mo temple in Hong Kong. It is a favorite with parents who come to pray for good progress for their kids in their studies.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes Of
    TOWN PLANNING BOARD Minutes of 316th Meeting of the Metro Planning Committee held at 9:00 a.m. on 25.11.2005 Present Director of Planning Chairman Mr. Bosco C.K. Fung Mr. K.G. McKinnell Mr. S.L. Ng Dr. Greg C.Y. Wong Mr. Erwin A. Hardy Mr. Tony W.C. Tse Mr. Nelson W.Y. Chan Mr. Leslie H.C. Chen Professor Bernard V.W.F. Lim Mr. Daniel B.M. To Mr. Stanley Y.F. Wong Ms. Sylvia S.F. Yau Assistant Commissioner for Transport (Urban), Transport Department Mr. Anthony Loo - 2 - Assistant Director (Environmental Assessment), Environmental Protection Department Mr. Elvis W.K. Au Assistant Director (Kowloon), Lands Department Mr. James Merritt Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Miss Ophelia Y.S. Wong Absent with Apologies Dr. Peter K.K. Wong Dr. Rebecca L.H. Chiu Dr. Alex S.K. Chan Mrs. Angelina P.L. Lee Professor N.K. Leung Assistant Director(2), Home Affairs Department Ms. Margaret Hsia In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board Mr. P.Y. Tam Chief Town Planner/Town Planning Board Ms. Brenda K.Y. Au Town Planner/Town Planning Board Mr. Simon C.K. Cheung - 3 - Agenda Item 1 Confirmation of the Draft Minutes of the 315th MPC Meeting held on 11.11.2005 1. The draft minutes of the 315th MPC meeting held on 11.11.2005 were confirmed without amendments. Agenda Item 2 Matters Arising [Open Meeting] (i) Section 12A Application No. Y/H24/1 2. The Secretary reported that a s.12A application was submitted by the Action Group on Protection of the Harbour on 8.10.2005 for rezoning the former Tamar Basin site and an area north of Citic Tower from “Government, Institution or Community (2)” (“G/IC(2)”) and “G/IC(4)” respectively to “Open Space”.
    [Show full text]
  • TTC Paper No.2/2018
    Annex 5 Response to TTC Paper No. 2/2018 of the 13th Traffic and Transport Committee under Southern District Council on 22 January 2018 Review of the First Year’s Operation of South Island Line (Include agenda item on “Follow up on the Design of Cover for Bus and Minibus Stops at the MTR Wong Chuk Hang Station” raised by Mr TSUI Yuen-wa and Mr Paul ZIMMERMAN, and “Review on Lack of Public Transportation from the Bays Area to the MTR Ocean Park Station” raised by Mr FUNG Se-goun, Fergus ) In respect of the agenda item on “Review of the First Year’s Operation of South Island Line”, the Transport Department’s response is as follows: “Review of the First Year’s Operation of South Island Line” raised by Mr CHAI Man-hon Wong Chuk Hang Station now serves as the main public transport interchange station for the South Island Line. There are two bus routes and four Green Minibus (GMB) routes providing feeder services for this station with details below: Feeder Bus and GMB Service Coverage Fare Routes Shum Wan-Wong Chuk Hang Station- CTB Route No. 48 $3.0 Wah Fu Estate (Circular) Wong Chuk Hang Station - NWFB Route No. 78 $3.2 Wah Kwai Estate (Circular) Wong Chuk Hang Station- GMB Route No. 4M $4.2 Aberdeen (Shek Pai Wan) GMB Route No. 5M Wong Chuk Hang Station-Grantham Hospital $4.2 Ap Lei Chau Estate-Wong Chuk Hang Station- GMB Route No. 29 $2.0* Shum Wan GMB Route No. 59A Shum Wan-Wong Chuk Hang Station-Aberdeen $3.9 *Section fare for service between Wong Chuk Hang Station and Shum Wan.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated 7-11 Convenience Stores
    Store # Area Region in Eng Address in Eng 0001 HK Happy Valley G/F., Winner House,15 Wong Nei Chung Road, Happy Valley, HK 0009 HK Quarry Bay Shop 12-13, G/F., Blk C, Model Housing Est., 774 King's Road, HK 0028 KLN Mongkok G/F., Comfort Court, 19 Playing Field Rd., Kln 0036 KLN Jordan Shop A, G/F, TAL Building, 45-53 Austin Road, Kln 0077 KLN Kowloon City Shop A-D, G/F., Leung Ling House, 96 Nga Tsin Wai Rd, Kowloon City, Kln 0084 HK Wan Chai G6, G/F, Harbour Centre, 25 Harbour Rd., Wanchai, HK 0085 HK Sheung Wan G/F., Blk B, Hiller Comm Bldg., 89-91 Wing Lok St., HK 0094 HK Causeway Bay Shop 3, G/F, Professional Bldg., 19-23 Tung Lo Wan Road, HK 0102 KLN Jordan G/F, 11 Nanking Street, Kln 0119 KLN Jordan G/F, 48-50 Bowring Street, Kln 0132 KLN Mongkok Shop 16, G/F., 60-104 Soy Street, Concord Bldg., Kln 0150 HK Sheung Wan G01 Shun Tak Centre, 200 Connaught Rd C, HK-Macau Ferry Terminal, HK 0151 HK Wan Chai Shop 2, 20 Luard Road, Wanchai, HK 0153 HK Sheung Wan G/F., 88 High Street, HK 0226 KLN Jordan Shop A, G/F, Cheung King Mansion, 144 Austin Road, Kln 0253 KLN Tsim Sha Tsui East Shop 1, Lower G/F, Hilton Tower, 96 Granville Road, Tsimshatsui East, Kln 0273 HK Central G/F, 89 Caine Road, HK 0281 HK Wan Chai Shop A, G/F, 151 Lockhart Road, Wanchai, HK 0308 KLN Tsim Sha Tsui Shop 1 & 2, G/F, Hart Avenue Plaza, 5-9A Hart Avenue, TST, Kln 0323 HK Wan Chai Portion of shop A, B & C, G/F Sun Tao Bldg, 12-18 Morrison Hill Rd, HK 0325 HK Causeway Bay Shop C, G/F Pak Shing Bldg, 168-174 Tung Lo Wan Rd, Causeway Bay, HK 0327 KLN Tsim Sha Tsui Shop 7, G/F Star House, 3 Salisbury Road, TST, Kln 0328 HK Wan Chai Shop C, G/F, Siu Fung Building, 9-17 Tin Lok Lane, Wanchai, HK 0339 KLN Kowloon Bay G/F, Shop No.205-207, Phase II Amoy Plaza, 77 Ngau Tau Kok Road, Kln 0351 KLN Kwun Tong Shop 22, 23 & 23A, G/F, Laguna Plaza, Cha Kwo Ling Rd., Kwun Tong, Kln.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Winter 33.5
    Envision Platinum Road Project Total Design at Hong Kong Airport Viaduct Challenges in Hong Kong Implications of China’s Belt and Road Initiative 2016 | WINTER/HIVER LESSONS FROM ASIA LEÇONS D’ASIE Publications Mail Agreement #40065710 Agreement Mail Publications www.csce.ca Canadian Civil Engineer | Winter 2016 1 CIVIL _WINTER 2016_LAZ.indd 1 2016-12-07 10:49 AM Civil_SFrame_Winter.indd CIVIL _WINTER 2016_LAZ.indd 1 2 2016-12-072016-11-29 10:49 8:54 AM contents WINTER 2016/HIVER 2016 | VOLUME 33.5 NEWS, VIEWS & IN VIEW: PROJECTS/PROJETS EN VEDETTE DEPARTMENTS 12 Low Level Road Project – Envision Platinum 15 Overcoming a Viaduct Challenge Through NOUVELLES, Innovaton POINTS DE VUE ET RUBRIQUES FORUM ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE/ FORUM SUR LES INFRASTRUCTURES 4 President’s perspective/ DURABLES Perspective présidentielle 10 Barriers and Solutions to Achieving Sustainable Infrastructure 6 From the regions: Quebec/ Région de Québec 8 Student voice/La voix des TECHNICAL: LESSONS FROM ASIA/ étudiants TECHNIQUE: LEÇONS D’ASIE 9 Young professionals 18 Introduction: There’s much to be learned from engineering in Asia. corner/Le coin des jeunes By Brian Burrell, vice-president, International, CSCE professionnels 19 China’s Belt and Road Initiative 34 CSCE partners and 22 Persistence pays in South Asia sponsors/Partenaires et 24 A triumph of total design: HKIA Mideld Concourse commanditaires SCGC 12 24 10 On the cover: Hong Kong International Airport, Mideld Concourse, photo by Kerun Ip/AAHK Canadian Civil Engineer | Winter 2016 3 Civil_SFrame_Winter.indd
    [Show full text]
  • Document Ordinance General Holidays Complaint Received
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With the main civil works contracts of the South Island Line (East) (SIL(E)) Project awarded in May 2011, the commencement date of construction of the Project was 25 June 2011. The Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme of the Project also commenced on 25 June 2011. All works area, except Harcourt Garden, has been substantially completed on or before November 2016 under Contract 902, 903, 904, 907 and 908. The SIL(E) passenger service commenced on 28 December 2016. The tentative schedule for completion of Harcourt Garden is December 2017. This is the SIL(E) Project Final EM&A Report Part 1. The Report presents the results of EM&A works undertaken during the period of June 2011 to 31 December 2016. Separate submission for the Final EM&A Report Part 2, covering Harcourt Garden, will be prepared and submitted after works completion in Q1 2018. Further, in accordance with the condition 2.13 of EP, the Final Monitoring Report for EPLP Monitoring will be submitted after completion of the 3 years post-planting care and maintenance period in Q1 2019. As there would be some remaining construction works for Contract 914 – Harcourt Garden, the EM&A programme and regular site inspections conducted by the Environmental Team (ET) will continue until completion of the construction works. No notification of summon or prosecution related to the environmental issue was received in the reporting period of June 2011 to December 2016. No non-conformance to the environmental requirements was identified in the reporting period of June 2011 to December 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020 Stock Code: 66
    Keep Cities Moving Annual Report 2020 Stock code: 66 SUSTAINABLE CARING INNOVATIVE CONTENTS For over four decades, MTR has evolved to become one of the leaders in rail transit, connecting communities in Hong Kong, the Mainland of China and around the world with unsurpassed levels of service reliability, comfort and safety. In our Annual Report 2020, we look back at one of the most challenging years in our history, a time when our Company worked diligently in the midst of an unprecedented global pandemic to continue delivering high operational standards while safeguarding the well-being of our customers and colleagues – striving, as always, to keep cities moving. Despite the adverse circumstances, we were still able to achieve our objective of planning an exciting strategic direction. This report also introduces our Corporate Strategy, “Transforming the Future”, which outlines how innovation, technology and, most importantly, sustainability and robust environmental, social and governance practices will shape the future for MTR. In addition, we invite you Keep Cities to read our Sustainability Report 2020, which covers how relevant Moving and material sustainability issues are managed and integrated into our business strategies. We hope that together, these reports offer valuable insights into the events of the past year and the steps we plan on taking toward helping Hong Kong and other cities we serve realise a promising long-term future. Annual Report Sustainability 2020 Report 2020 Overview Business Review and Analysis 2 Corporate Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Paper on Fares of MTR South Island Line (East)
    CB(4)151/16-17(01) Legislative Council Panel on Transport Fares of MTR South Island Line (East) This paper briefs Members on the fares of MTR South Island Line (East) (“SIL(E)”). Background 2. The MTR Corporation Limited (“MTRCL”) is conducting final inspections on SIL(E). Depending on the final outcome of the inspections, it is expected that SIL(E) will commence passenger service in December 20161. The 7-kilometre medium capacity railway is going to link up the South and the North of Hong Kong Island from South Horizons Station to Admiralty Station via Lei Tung Station, Wong Chuk Hang Station and Ocean Park Station. Passengers can transit to MTR Island Line, Tsuen Wan Line and the future Shatin to Central Link at Admiralty Station. The existing Admiralty Station has been expanded to become a major railway hub, with a view to facilitating convenient interchanges by passengers. Fares of SIL(E) 3. In accordance with the Operating Agreement signed between the Government and MTRCL, MTRCL shall brief the Legislative Council Panel on Transport and the Transport Advisory Committee on fares of new railway lines. 4. The SIL(E) connects to the existing railway network at Admiralty Station and is a part of the railway network of the Hong Kong Island. The same “distance-based” fare structure of the existing MTR heavy rail system is applied to determining fares of the new stations of the new railway line. Basic principles are set out below: a) Non-cross harbour journeys on the Island Line The fares of the journeys between the new SIL(E) stations and other stations on the Island Line are determined with reference to 1 For details of the major works progress of SIL(E) (as at 30 September 2016), please refer to the paper submitted by the Transport and Housing Bureau to the Subcommittee on Matters Relating to Railways under the Legislative Council Panel on Transport in November 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021/08 the Locations of Voice Navigation ATM Service Are As
    2021/08 The locations of Voice Navigation ATM Service are as below: Hong Kong Island District Location Address 1 Aberdeen Branch 25 Wu Pak Street, Aberdeen, Hong Kong 2 Aldrich Garden Shop 40, Aldrich Garden Shopping Centre, No.2 Oi Lai Street, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong 3 Ap Lei Chau Branch 13-15 Wai Fung Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong 4 Bonham Road Branch 63 Bonham Road, Hong Kong 5 Caine Road Branch 57 Caine Road, Hong Kong 6 Central Barracks Block 10, Central Barracks, Hong Kong 7 Central District (Wing On B/F-2/F, Wing on House, 71 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong House) Branch 8 Central District Branch 2A Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong 9 Central Government Offices Area A on the First Floor of Central Government Offices, No. 2 Tim Mei Avenue, Tamar, Hong Kong 10 China's Foreign Ministry 42 Kennedy Road, Central, Hong Kong 11 Des Voeux Road West Branch 111-119 Des Voeux Road West, Hong Kong 12 First Street Branch 55A First Street, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong 13 Fung Wah Estate ATM AT M in covered walkway on Ground Floor, Hiu Fung House, Fung Wah Services Estate, Nos. 4 & 6 Fung Ha Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong 14 Grantham Hospital G/F, Main Block, Grantham Hospital, 125 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Aberdeen, HK 15 Happy Valley Branch 11 King Kwong Street, Happy Valley, Hong Kong 16 Harbour Road Branch Shop 6, G/F, Causeway Centre, 28 Harbour Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong 17 Healthy Village Branch Shop 1& 2, Healthy Village Phase II, 668 King's Road, North Point 18 Heng Fa Chuen Branch Shop 205-208, East Wing Shopping Centre, Heng Fa Chuen, Chai Wan, Hong Kong 19 Hing Wah (II) Estate Site at Open Space adjacent to Shop No.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Panel on Transport Subcommittee on Matters Relations to Railways
    Legislative Council Panel on Transport Subcommittee on Matters Relations to Railways Approach and Updates of MTR Station Art Programme Purpose This paper aims to discuss the approach and progress of the incorporation of art in railway stations of the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL). Background 2. The MTRCL is committed to providing a pleasant travelling environment for passengers. In 1998, the “art in MTR” concept was introduced to enhance the travelling environment and showcase the diversity of cultural and historical characteristics of local districts. A comprehensive art programme has also been developed which offers a channel for local artists to exhibit their talent and helps to promote the appreciation of art in Hong Kong. 3. Public participation is important in the station art programme especially for the stations of new railway lines. The MTRCL has asked the local communities to contribute their ideas for the art element for new stations in the preliminary stage of the station design. The aim is to reflect the cultural and historical characteristics unique to each station in the design. By participating in station design, the communities also develop stronger connections to the new railway lines. Approach 4. The MTRCL takes a number of factors into consideration when determining the type, size and location of artwork to be displayed at railway stations. The priority is that the art piece should not affect the normal operation and passenger flow of stations. Other factors that need to be taken into account include the environment of the station, restrictions of space and technical feasibility. Generally, sculpture and mural are two common types of artwork that are displayed at stations on a long-term basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities in China’S Urban Aedascope Planning Directive Architecture Arts Team Graphics Interiors Landscape Urban Design & Masterplanning News Awards
    Issue 9 May 2016 09 Opportunities in China’s Urban Aedascope Planning Directive Architecture Arts Team Graphics Interiors Landscape Urban Design & Masterplanning News Awards Wuhan Kunlun City Master Plan, Wuhan, PRC OPPORTUNITIES IN CHINA’S URBAN PLANNING DIRECTIVE The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the While most established cities around the world are facing State Council has released a guideline document on urban high pressure to respond to an increasing demand for planning to tackle problems associated with urbanisation density and efficiency, China has a chance to lead a and the explosion of city sizes. Aedas welcomes the new trend of city hub developments. Chairman Keith guidelines and sees opportunities in China. Griffiths predicts that the city will develop a network of high-density city hubs around the central business China’s growth requires planning and development of district. These city hubs will be true high-density live- urban environments in the context of the total city. The work-recreate communities in which all facilities are document calls for modern, vibrant, distinctive and available within walking distance. The buildings will be optimal cities through the application of the principles porous and dissolve the ground plane into multiple public of forward planning, innovation, efficient land use and decks, offering interpenetration of landscaping, light and densification achieved through the rule of law. In the air. Well-planned public spaces will bond and connect future there will be a focus on sustainability, community, mixed-use buildings over transport hubs with high heritage conservation, functional and aesthetically connectivity. pleasing architecture and the strengthening of professional ethics.
    [Show full text]